Answers
Related Questions
Litigation Decision
1
Sarah Gable is the President of Gable's Department Store. Last year Jeremiah Walls, a 35 year-old man, fell on the ice in the Gable department store parking lot. Walls, who hurt his wrist and fractured his ankle in the accident, has brought a suit against Gable's. Of course, Sarah Gable would like to settle out of court and hence has initiated discussion with Walls' counsel. However, Gable is willing to go to trial if Walls' attorney is unreasonable. The first step of the process is a summary judgment in which the judge will decide whether to hear the case. It will cost Gable $3,000 in attorney fees to prepare for summary judgment, and she estimates that there is 90% chance that the judge will decide to hear the case and a 10% chance that the case will be dismissed. If the case is heard, Gable's best guess is that there's a 2-in-3 chance that Walls will win, with an expected award of $50,000. A court trial will cost Gable another $10,000 in lawyer's fees. a) Assume that Gable makes her decisions on the basis of expected value. What is the most she would be willing to pay to avoid going to trial? b) If Walls wins, Gable may appeal the decision. There is a 25% chance that the judge will hear the appeal. If the judge hears an appeal, there is a 90% chance that Walls will win, with the same expected award of $50,000. If Gable appeals, additional attorney fees will be $2,000, with an additional $5,000 if the appeal is heard. If Walls wins, should Gable appeal?
Answers
a) Based on expected value, Gable would be willing to pay up to $27,500 to avoid going to trial.
To calculate the expected value, we need to consider the probabilities and outcomes at each stage of the litigation process.
The first step is the summary judgment, where there is a 90% chance the judge will decide to hear the case (0.9) and a 10% chance the case will be dismissed (0.1). If the case is heard, there is a 2-in-3 chance that Walls will win (2/3), with an expected award of $50,000.
So the expected value of going to trial is:
(0.9 * (2/3) * $50,000) - ($10,000 + $3,000) = $20,000 - $13,000 = $7,000.
Therefore, Gable would be willing to pay up to the expected value of going to trial, which is $7,000, to avoid going to trial.
b) If Walls wins, Gable should not appeal the decision.
To determine whether Gable should appeal, we need to calculate the expected value of appealing.
There is a 25% chance the judge will hear the appeal (0.25). If the appeal is heard, there is a 90% chance that Walls will win (0.9), with the same expected award of $50,000.
The expected value of appealing is:
(0.25 * 0.9 * $50,000) - ($2,000 + $5,000) = $11,250 - $7,000 = $4,250.
Since the expected value of appealing is positive ($4,250), Gable should appeal the decision if Walls wins. It means that the potential gain from winning the appeal outweighs the additional attorney fees.
Learn more about litigation here: brainly.com/question/28945859
#SPJ11
i GOTS to know... Damon or Stefan
Answers
Why not xdxdxd
Write a two- to three-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast the structure and function of the national government with the structure and function of New Hampshire's/States government. Use what you’ve learned about the national government and do research to find out more about your state government. Include the following in your essay:
The structure of national and state government
The functions of national and state government
The distribution of power between national and state government, including the purpose of Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution
Current state leaders and the roles and functions they perform within state government
Answers
National and state governments have similar structures and functions,with power distribution defined by the U.S. Constitution.
The Essay
The national government and New Hampshire's state government share a three-branch structure,with executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
They have distinct functions,such as law enforcement, lawmaking, and law interpretation. Power distribution is defined by the U.S. Constitution, including Article IV, Section 4,which guarantees a republican form of government in each state.
New Hampshire's current state leaders, including the Governor,perform crucial roles in executing state laws and managing government affairs.
Learn more about structure of government at:
https://brainly.com/question/22236084
#SPJ1
why the Third Circuit Court of Appeals found that there was sufficient evidence to uphold the Defendant’s conviction for securities fraud/insider trading
Answers
Explanation:
The law of insider trading has been called everything from a "theoretical mess" to "astonishingly dysfunctional," with calls for change from Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission to clarify the scope of the prohibition. But is the law really so bad? The elements are now well established, despite gray areas around the edges like other white collar crimes. Congress and the general public have embraced insider trading as something clearly wrongful. If the law needs to be changed, the most likely push would be to expand it by adopting the possession theory of liability used in Rule 14e-3 for tender offers and the European Union that makes trading on almost any confidential information subject to prosecution.
what are some privileges/perks of serving for the u.s senate?
Answers
Answer:
Members get annual allowances (averaging $1.27 million in the House and $3.3 million in the Senate) to staff and manage their offices almost entirely as they see fit, as well as for travel and other expenses.The House has averaged 138 legislative days each year since 2001, and the Senate 162. The job requires long days, and members are often active in their districts when not in session, but how many jobs give their employees over 6 months to plan and schedule entirely as they see fit?While members of Congress are required to purchase insurance via an Affordable Care Act exchange, they receive a federal subsidy amounting to 72% of their premiums, per Snopes. (Democrats say it's a stand-in for the employer contribution most workers get.) They're also potentially eligible for lifetime health insurance under the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program upon retirement.Depending on age and length of service, members can receive a lifelong pension of 80% — which, given today's congressional salary of $174,000, equals out to $139,200 in annual taxpayer-funded retirement benefits, per Investopedia.Upon the death of a member of Congress in office, their family will receive a payout equal to a year's salary ($174,000), per Congressional Institute. The one-time death gratuity for families of military personnel killed in action is $100,000.Members of Congress have access to free, reserved parking spots at DC-area airports, a dedicated congressional call desk with major airlines and the ability to reserve seats on multiple flights but only pay for the flight boarded.Our nation's legislators get a slew of lifetime benefits even after leaving office, including a taxpayer-funded gym at the Capitol, access to the House and Senate floors, parking in House lots, and the ability to dine in the House and Senate dining rooms, per The Washington Post.in negligence cases, the plaintiff must prove two elements, both of which are labeled as aspects or tests of causation; they are . . .
Answers
In negligence cases, the plaintiff must prove two elements of causation. The first element is the "cause in fact" or the "but-for" test, which requires the plaintiff to establish that the injury or harm would not have occurred "but for" the defendant's actions.
In other words, the defendant's actions were the actual cause of the harm. The second element is the "proximate cause" or "foreseeability" test, which requires the plaintiff to show that the harm was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's actions. This means that the harm was a direct and natural consequence of the defendant's actions and was not too remote or unforeseeable. Both elements must be proven to establish causation in a negligence case.
To know more about negligence cases click here:
brainly.com/question/30974571
#SPJ4
Explain the Full Fundamental Law with formulae? Haren
Answers
The full fundamental law of arithmetic is a theorem in number theory. It states that every positive integer greater than 1 can be factored into a unique product of prime numbers. That is, any integer n can be written in the form:n = p1^a1 * p2^a2 * p3^a3 * ... * pk^ak where pi are prime numbers and ai are non-negative integers.
This factorization is unique up to the order of the factor. The proof of this theorem is beyond the scope of this answer, but it relies on the fact that any integer can be written as a product of primes. This fact can be proven using Euclid's lemma, which states that if a prime number divides the product of two integers, then it must divide at least one of the factors.
To know more about arithmetic, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/16415816#
#SPJ11
What is the "first consideration" for policymakers?
Answers
Answer;
Lavis JN, Gilbert R, Salanti G, Harden M, See S. Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:874–87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi08Hope it's helpful to youWhose job is it to protect the judge and others in the courtroom?
a) Police Officers
b) Bailiffs
c) Sheriffs
d) Special Agents
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Please help me with my french homework
Answers
Answer:
draw yourself and introduce yourself with a simple sentence
like for example
j'aime l'art et la façon dont vous pouvez y exprimer votre opinion (i love art and the way you can speak your mind in it )
than like draw you painting a piece of art
hope this helps
which is the most important idea that should be embraced?
Answers
A copy of Trotha's Extermination Order survives in the Botswana National Archives. The order states "every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will no longer accept women or children, I will drive them back to their people [to die in the desert] or let them be shot at."
Attorney Sarah Robinson represents a woman named Taylor Jackson as a plaintiff in a car accident case. The defense has made an offer to settle the case, but Sarah leaves it on her desk without forwarding a copy to Taylor. Taylor calls six times to check on the status of the case, but all of the calls go unanswered. The settlement offer expires before Taylor ever sees it.
Answers
Answer:
Her actions were illegal
Explanation:
We could make the conclusion that the attorney's actions were illegal. Consider, under the requirements of the law, an attorney acts as a representative to clients by giving advice to the clients, etc.
But they do not have the responsibility of making decisions for their clients except they receive the consent of their clients.
Marty is on the verge of failing her calculus class. If she passes her final exam she will pass the class. She is stressed out about studying and doesn't know what to do. She knows her roommate Hannah has a prescription that she takes for her Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD). In a moment of weakness, Marty steals her roommate's prescription and takes two of the pills. How would a drug counselor view Marty's actions?
The drug counselor would view it as a legitimate use of drugs because Marty needs the pills to study and pass calculus.
The drug counselor would view it as a form of drug abuse because Marty stole pills that were not prescribed to her.
The drug counselor would view it as not a big deal because Hannah has an entire bottle of pills and she is not going to miss two of them.
The drug counselor would think that Marty should see a doctor too is she needs a prescription to study.
Answers
Answer:
The drug counselor would view it as a form of drug abuse because Marty stole pills that were not prescribed to her.
Which law provides legal recourse to people who purchase animals from pet dealers which are later found to have a disease or defect?.
Answers
The law that is being asked about here is the Pet Purchase Protection Law, also known as the "Puppy Lemon Law". It is a purchaser protection law that was enacted to provide legal recourse to people who bought animals from dealers that were later found to have disease or defect.
This purchaser protection legislations are currently in place in 22 U.S. states for the exact reason that their names suggest, and that is to safeguard the pet owner.
A typical Pet Purchaser Protection Act gives the fur parents a right of redress if they purchase an animal with a disease or defect from the seller while also requiring the seller to make specific disclosures regarding the animal that is being put on the market.
Discover why owning a pet from the pound or Animal Rescue League has many advantages: https://brainly.com/question/11899645
#SPJ4
Who is Sir Robert Peel?
Answers
And he was a British conservative statesman who was prime minister twice
3. Illustrate and explain the process of effective communication to be used by an organization.
Answers
Answer:
Safeguard credibility to establish loyalty and build trust.
Maintain consistency to establish a strong employment brand.
Listen to employees and to members of the leadership team.
Seek input from all constituencies.
Provide feedback.
Successfulness of the competition policy in South Africa
Answers
Answer:
The product choices along with its competitive prices were provided to the consumers.
Explanation:
If your license is a must wear a correct of glass lenses you
Answers
Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.
Explanation:
What is the difference between an open peril and a named peril?
A. A open peril is not excluded in the policy.
B. An open peril can be a named peril.
C. A named peril is limited to open perils.
D. The amount of coverage for each is different.
Answer is A.
Answers
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answers
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
Legal questions asked during the case of Ramokgopa v NXumalo
Answers
The legal questions in the case of Ramokgopa v NXumalo encompassed issues of negligence, causation, contributory negligence, damages, and compensation, including the respondent's negligence in preventing the accident, the direct cause of the plaintiff's injuries, the plaintiff's own responsibility, the reasonableness of damages, entitlement to future expenses and loss of earnings, and compensation for pain and suffering.
In the case of Ramokgopa v NXumalo, various legal questions were raised, including:
Was the respondent negligent in failing to prevent the motor vehicle accident?Did the respondent's negligence directly cause the plaintiff's injuries?Was the plaintiff partially responsible for their own injuries?Were the damages claimed by the plaintiff reasonable and proportionate to their injuries?Is the plaintiff entitled to compensation for future medical expenses and loss of earnings resulting from the injuries?Can the plaintiff seek compensation for pain and suffering caused by the injuries?In summary, the legal questions in the case of Ramokgopa v NXumalo pertained to issues of negligence, causation, contributory negligence, damages, and compensation.
For more such questions on legal questions:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ8
when presidents offer interpretations of new laws before those laws are implemented, they typically do so:
Answers
When presidents offer interpretations of new laws before those laws are implemented, they typically do so by providing their reasons and any background information they have.
In a bid to ensure clarity in their interpretation of the new laws, they aim to provide detailed explanations. In the United States, presidents are allowed to provide interpretations of new laws before they are implemented. They do so using signing statements. Signing statements are formal written declarations that accompany a bill signed into law. Most of the time, the president uses them to explain how they see the law or what the administration thinks about the issue is. Signing statements were mostly used by the US Supreme Court in the beginning. However, presidents have issued more signing statements than ever before in recent history. One such instance was President George W. Bush's issuance of more than 150 signing statements, which drew criticism from Congress and some legal scholars.
Learn more on laws here:
brainly.com/question/370944
#SPJ11
rue or False: If you are under the age of 18, your license can be suspended for six months to one year for the first offense.
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
as you go on 1st offence 2nd offence 3rd offence and so forth it gets worse depending on how bad your first offence will be 6 months to a year
How does the constitution guard against tyranny? (Paragraph) 10 points
Answers
The federalist system, the separation of powers, and the system of checks and balances are the three fundamental ways that the Constitution guards against tyranny. To guard against tyranny, the Constitution has the Checks and Balances clause.
When did the Constitution guard against tyranny?To address the problem of tyranny, Representatives from practically every state in the United States gathered in Philadelphia in 1787. In order to protect us against tyranny, the House introduces "The Articles of Confederation."
What does tyranny mean in government?In the Greco-Roman era, tyranny was an authoritarian type of government in which a single person ruled without any checks or balances. Tyrant was a term used in antiquity to describe someone who held absolute political power but was not always considered a bad thing.
To know more about tyranny visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5030096
#SPJ9
a court order directing someone to do something or to refrain from doing something is called a judicial citation.a) Trueb) False
Answers
Answer:
false
Explanation:
a court order directing someone to do something or to refrain from doing something is called a Injunction
The given statement, a court order directing someone to do something or to refrain from doing something is called a judicial citation is True.
A judicial citation is a court order that directs someone to do something or to refrain from doing something. It may be issued by a judge, magistrate, or other judicial officer. Judicial citations are used in a variety of situations, from ordering someone to pay a debt to prohibiting them from entering certain premises.
In some cases, a court may issue a judicial citation to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement or to sanction someone for failing to comply with a court order. Judicial citations are legally binding and must be obeyed. Failure to obey a judicial citation can result in legal consequences, such as fines, jail time, or both.
know more about magistrate here
https://brainly.com/question/13523139#
#SPJ11
So if a person is bored and wants to text random people’s numbers as a hope to make friends.. is that legally allowed? Also any # suggestions?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
yeah technically its legal
monsters are monsters in my book
Answers
Answer:
David rossi
Explanation:
Answer:
.
Explanation:
The crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process, and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
Answers
It is a true statement that the crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
What is the model of the criminal justice system?The model assumes that freedom is so important that every effort must be made to ensure that criminal justice decisions are based on reliable information.
Hence, the model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the adversarial process, the rights of defendants and formal decision-making procedures.
Therefore, It is a true statement that the crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
Read more about justice system
brainly.com/question/18445073
#SPJ1
Chris is an atheist. The town of Niskayuna has erected its annual “Holiday Spectacular” lawn decorations in front of the town hall. This includes a Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, Frosty the Snowman, a giant dreidel, and three wise men and an angel. Chris works at the town hall and is subjected to the “Holiday Spectacular” Every. Single. Day. He is highly offended by the display’s religious overtones and feels uncomfortable while at work with the display right outside his office window. Chris sues the town for violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court.
Answers
Answer:
Christmas has basically always been religious, it's in the name. If he's offended, he can find another job or move. But just because one person doesnt like something doesnt mean they should act out this way about it.
Explanation:
backspace backspace backspace
Answers
Answer:
backspace
Explanation:
delete
Answer:
When u wanna delete something
Explanation:
Have a Nice Day