An officer enters a home by lying to the home owner by saying she has a search warrant. The owner of the home was never shown the warrant and the officer finds drug paraphernalia and a small baggie of cocaine. They arrest the owner of the home. In court, the owner of the home asks that the evidence not be admitted due to the false warrant. What would the Supreme Court rule? Which case provides precedent for this situation that falls under the 4th Amendment? I Need help
Answers
answer:
the supreme court would most likely deem that based on the fact that a law enforment officer forced entry into your home and lied saying that they had a warrant, that, that was a unreasonable search and seizure under the law.
explanation:
the police may knock and announce their presence at your door but unless they have a warrant, you are not required to open the door, to answer any questions, or to cooperate with the police in any fashion.
(source: libertylaw.ca)
"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,"
"no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
(source: constitution of united states of america 1789 *revised in 1992*)
"the fourth amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government"
"however, not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law."
(source: uscourts.gov)
so
the supreme court would most likely deem that based on the fact that a law enforment officer forced entry into your home and lied saying that they had a warrant, that, that was a "unreasonable" "search and seizure" "under the law."
Related Questions
In the context of policing, which of the following statements is true about in-service training?
Answers
B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.
Can the police impose penalties?A senior officer may discipline him by giving him a warning if it is claimed (by a citizen or peer) that he has been disrespectful, behaved improperly, abused his authority, or neglected to perform his task.
Enforcement of economic laws and the pursuit of economic crime in India are the responsibilities of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), a law enforcement and economic intelligence organisation. It is a component of the Ministry of Finance's Department of Revenue in India.
To know more about police visit:-
brainly.com/question/24655820
#SPJ9
Complete question:
In the context of policing, which of the following statements is true about in-service training?
A. It is the least effective training tool in communicating new state legislations or court decisions to experienced police officers.
B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.
C. It is usually given to new recruits before they join their police departments.
D. It is primarily used to weed out new recruits who underperform during their probationary period.
the employment act of 1946 states that it is the responsibility of the federal government to
Answers
The Employment Act of 1946 states that it is the responsibility of the federal government to promote full employment, production, and purchasing power in the United States.
The Employment Act of 1946, also known as the Full Employment Act, was enacted with the aim of addressing economic instability and promoting economic growth. The act emphasizes the federal government's responsibility to promote full employment, which means ensuring that there are enough job opportunities available for the workforce. It also highlights the importance of promoting production and maintaining high levels of purchasing power to stimulate economic activity.
The act established the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) to provide the President with expert advice on economic policy and to assist in achieving the goals set forth in the act. By placing the responsibility on the federal government, the Employment Act of 1946 underscores the government's role in fostering a strong and stable economy that benefits the American people.
To know more about Employment Act click here brainly.com/question/27853276
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements correctly describe how a rate law is determined?
The value of k can be calculated from a single experiment once the reaction orders are known.
If there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually.
The rate law is determined by measuring the initial reaction rate for different reactant concentrations.
Answers
The correct statement that describes how a rate law is determined is "b. If there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually."
What is the rate law?The rate law is the formula that describes how the concentration of reactants changes with time. The rate law is expressed in terms of the rate of a chemical reaction and is determined by measuring the rate of a reaction over a range of concentrations of the reactants involved. Usually, the rate law can be expressed in the form of the equation as shown below:
Rate = k[A]^x [B]^y
Where A and B are reactants in the reaction, k is the rate constant and y are the reaction orders concerning reactants A and B, respectively.
How is the rate law determined?The rate law can be determined by following the steps below:
1. Measure the initial rate of reaction: Measure the rate of the reaction at the beginning of the reaction to determine the initial rate. The initial rate is determined by measuring the rate at which the reactants are consumed or products are formed.
2. Measure the rate of reaction for different concentrations: Determine the rate of reaction at different concentrations of reactants. The rate of reaction is measured as a function of the reactant concentrations.
3.Plug in rate data into the rate law equation: Plug the rate data obtained from the experiments into the rate law equation to determine the rate constant and the reaction orders concerning the reactants involved. Therefore, if there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually.
Thus option b which is "If there is more than one reactant present the reaction orders will usually be determined individually" is the right answer that describes how a rate law is determined.
Learn more about Rate Law at: https://brainly.com/question/16981791
#SPJ11
1. Identify five similarities that you see between the rights contained in the UN document
and the fundamental rights of United States citizens from the US Bill of Rights discussed in
Lesson 3.
2. Identify five rights from the UN articles that you would like to add to a list of guarantees
under the US Constitution.
3. Are any rights that you believe should be included but that are missing from either the US
Bill of Rights or the UN Declaration of Human Rights? Give at least two to three rights.
Answers
1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.
2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.
3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.
The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.
These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.
Fundamental Rights The fundamental rights of the articles include freedom of speech, freedom of movement, right to press, right to information, right to conduct business, etc. These rights are universally applicable and contained in the documents of most of the countries and also in the UN document. US follows constitutional democracy in its governance, and it enables that the rights can be amended and revoked by the Supreme Court at any such time it may deem fit.Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.
Learn more about fundamental rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
a contractor, who is white, was indicted by a state grand jury for bribery of a public official. all non-white jurors were intentionally excluded from the grand jury. as a consequence, the contractor sought to quash the indictment, but she was unsuccessful. the contractor was tr
Answers
The appellate court reverse the contractor's conviction because option B. Yes, because the rights of the members of the excluded racial group were violated under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Despite not belonging to the excluded racial group of whites, a defendant who is indicted by a grand jury from whose members have been purposefully excluded has standing to assert Equal Protection claims on their behalf.
Trial courts are placed above appellate courts so that they can evaluate their work and make any necessary corrections. Rather than the single judge who normally preside over a trial court, appellate courts are frequently college bodies with multiple judges.
The question is incomplete, find the complete question here
a contractor, who is white, was indicted by a state grand jury for bribery of a public official. all non-white jurors were intentionally excluded from the grand jury. as a consequence, the contractor sought to quash the indictment, but she was unsuccessful. the contractor was trying to appeal court which than found that the exclusion was harmless error with respect to the contractor's conviction.
Should the appellate court reverse the contractor's conviction?
A. Yes, because there is a constitutional right to a grand jury indictment.
B. Yes, because the rights of the members of the excluded racial group were violated under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
C. No, because the exclusion of the racial group was harmless error with regard to the contractor's conviction.
D. No, because the contractor lacks standing to challenge the exclusion of members of another race from the grand jury that indicted her.
To learn more about appellate courts here
brainly.com/question/13944421
#SPJ4
differentiate between duress and undue influence with examples
Answers
Answer:
An example of duress would be physical abuse by the abuser, ex., hitting the victim until they gave the abuser valuable jewelry. Proving undue influence is more complicated. An example of undue influence would be for an abusive spouse to withhold affection, unless the abusive spouse were given valuable jewelry.
What major legislation encouraged thousands of immigrants to settle land in the western united states?.
Answers
The primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
What all acts were introduced to set the Western region of the US?It was said that the act was carried out or passed in order to promote economic progress and the expansion of the American West.
It should be noted that the Homestead Act of 1862, which Congress is said to have passed, granted 160 acres of federal land to anyone who would agree to farm the land.
Due to the 160 acres of land that the Homestead Act gave settlers, it is known to have promoted significant migration to the West.
The Homestead Act was therefore a key piece of legislation that encouraged numerous immigrants to buy land in the western United States.
Therefore, the primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
For more information on Homestead Act, refer to the following:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487
#SPJ4
sometimes the parties to the agreement want to replace one of the parties with a third party. this substitution of a party is called a: blank______.
Answers
The substitution of a party in an agreement with another party is called an "assignment."
In the context of contracts, an assignment refers to the transfer of rights and obligations from one party to another. When the parties to an agreement want to replace one of the original parties with a third party, they can do so through an assignment. This allows the incoming third party (assignee) to assume the rights and responsibilities of the outgoing party (assignor).
However, it is important to note that an assignment requires the consent of all parties involved and is typically governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the original agreement. Through an assignment, the parties can ensure a smooth transition of rights and obligations while maintaining the validity and enforceability of the contract.
To know more about assignment click here brainly.com/question/13858252
#SPJ11
Please helpppp! Forensic science FLVS
Answers
Mass and velocity are scalar quantities, whereas velocity and momentum are vector quantities.
What is a scalar magnitude?A scalar quantity is any measurement that can be defined only by its magnitude (e.g., density, speed, volume, mass, etc).
Mass measures the matter in a given object, whereas matter is something that contains mass.
Speed is a physical property of the matter indicating how quickly an object is moved without regard its direction.
Mass is a scalar quantity because it is associated with magnitude, and speed is also a scalar quantity of a velocity vector.
Conversely, velocity is the speed of a given object that moves in a given direction, it is a vector quantity because it involves magnitude and direction.
Finally, momentum is a value obtained by multiplying the mass of an object by its velocity, it is also a vector quantity that has a magnitude and direction.
In conclusion, mass and velocity refers to scalar quantities, whereas velocity and momentum can be defined as vector quantities.
Learn more about scalar magnitudes here:
https://brainly.com/question/13445233
#SPJ1
a legal argument based on the notion that a defendant should not be held responsible for an illegal act if it is attributable to mental illness or intellectual disability that interferes with rationality is called a(n.
Answers
A legal argument based on the notion that a defendant should not be held responsible for an illegal act if it is attributable to mental illness or intellectual disability that interferes with rationality is called an insanity defense.
What is an insanity defense?An insanity defense is a legal defense that argues that the accused was not guilty of the crime owing to insanity at the time of the crime. The defense acknowledges that the accused perpetrated the act, but claims that due to a mental illness, they were unable to understand the wrongfulness of their conduct.In court cases, how is the insanity defense used?
The insanity defense may be employed in court cases where a defendant is charged with a crime, but the defense argues that the defendant was mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense, and thus incapable of knowing that what they were doing was wrong.The insanity defense necessitates the use of psychiatric testimony to support the assertion that the defendant was mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense.
Only in specific, severe cases are people allowed to make an insanity defense claim, such as those involving mental disorders or intellectual disabilities that impair or limit cognitive functioning.The most well-known application of the insanity defense in criminal law is in homicide cases, and it's often employed when the defendant has been found to have committed murder but is discovered to have been mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense.
To know more about insanity defense refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28249990
#SPJ11
1. Think about the homeless elderly or the underprivileged children or the street animals or the exploitation of the environment or climate change or gender equality. Select any one challenge & chalk out a practical plan creatively as to how you will tackle it.
Answers
Answer:
Climate change :
Climate change, a very known fundamental in the 21 st century. The best way to tackle it is to go for strong powers of the world such as United nations organisation.
Strict decisions are needed to be made. As per the recent reports the carbon emissions has been increasing very quickly and western countries are the major source of it. Thus, it would first promote the use of electrical vehicles and will demote industries that emit such emissions.
Describe the functions of the Infrastructure Tracking Unit, the Processing Unit, and the Visual Unit?
Answers
Answer:
The Infrastructure Tracker
Explanation:
was responsible for collecting data from the real world, sending them to the Processing Unit, which mixed the virtual content with the real content and sent the result to the Video Out module of the Visual Unit.
This question is about the Augmented Reality System which is divided into three major parts: The Infrastructure Tracking Unit, the Processing Unit, and the Visual Unit.
The Infrastructure Tracking Unit is known for being the unit that gathers the system data from the real world and then transfers them to the Processing Unit for manipulation.The Processing Unit, on the other hand, performs the function of combining the virtual content with the real content and then transfer the result to the Visual Unit.Visual Unit is a part of the Augmented Reality System that displays the processed data or images to the users. It is of two types. They are Video See-through Visual Unit and Optical See-through Visual Unit.Hence, in this case, it is concluded that different parts of the Augmented Reality System perform different functions.
Learn more here https://brainly.com/question/9054673
Which of the President's nine roles calls for him to set the nation's foreign policy?
Answers
Answer: The answer is Chief Diplomat
Explanation: Its him because the role of the President as Chief Diplomat is the one that calls him to set the nation's foreign policy, in fact, it makes him its main designer. His power is so large that his rulings are followed both by the US and foreign parties.
HAVE A GOOD DAY Y’ALL
Compare and contrast the major aspects of Crime Scene Technology discussed.
Please write a full sentence or l will report you.
Answers
Crime scene technology involves the use of a selection of tools and techniques to gather information and analyze evidence located at the site of any alleged crime.
What are the examples?Primary examples of such technology include forensic photography, evidence collection and safekeeping, fingerprint detection, DNA sampling, as well as ballistics examination.
Forensically capturing gallery-quality pictures of both the scene and the proof is elemental in preserving all future reference material. Careful gathering and packaging of the articles of proof ensure they remain untampered with throughout the analytical process.
Investigating fingerprints present around the locale aids in recognizing and differentiating between possible suspects. Examining blood and tissue exemplars furnishes the means to identify offenders due to unique genetic identifiers. Through ballistic analysis one can examine ammunition, shell casings, and firearms to ascertain their association to the episode.
Read more about crime scene here:
https://brainly.com/question/12886002
#SPJ1
Every persons body is diffrent ,
A) but every vehicals cabin is the same
B) and every vehicular cabin layout is diffrent
Answers
Answer:
the answer is b
Explanation:
Duty-based ethical standards are based on religious precepts or derived through philosophical reasoning.
True / False
Answers
Duty-based ethical standards are based on religious precepts or derived through philosophical reasoning.True
Deontological (duty-based) ethics is concerned with what people do rather than the outcomes of their actions.
Make the correct decision.Perform the action because it is the right thing to do.Don't do anything wrong.They should be avoided because they are incorrect.This type of ethics does not allow you to justify an action by demonstrating that it had positive consequences, which is why it is also known as 'non-Consequentialist'.
The term 'deontological' is derived from the Greek word deon, which means 'duty'.
When people talk about 'the principle of the thing,' they usually mean duty-based ethics.
Learn more about ethical standards to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/28295890
#SPJ4
What would be the likely outcome if the courts and the criminal justice system did not treat cases differently simply because of the offense involved
Answers
An accident occurs between a truck and a family vehicle. The truck is owned by a corporation with businesses in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The truck driver is from Ohio. The corporation is incorporated in Delaware but is headquartered in Pennsylvania. The family members in the vehicle include a grandmother domiciled in New Jersey and a mother and daughter domiciled in Connecticut. The accident occurs in New York. The family sues the corporation.
Is there federal jurisdiction?
What states have jurisdiction? (Assume that subject matter jurisdiction requires the incident or the residents of all defendants to be in the state of suit. )
Answers
The United States of America is a federal republic made up of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the nation's capital), five major territories, and numerous minor islands.
The states, as well as the United States as a whole, are both sovereign jurisdictions. Any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any American territory falls under the jurisdiction of the United States. England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are the three legal jurisdictions of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Learn more about jurisdictions
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
Black American men were granted suffrage before American women.
True
False
Answers
Answer:false
Explanation:
Black men were given voting rights in 1870, while black women were effectively banned until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
What is the path to becoming an attorney in the United states?
Answers
The path to becoming an attorney in the United States takes 7 years of full-time study which is after the high school, that is 4 years of undergraduate study, followed by 3 years of law school
Attorneys typically do need about seven years of college. After high school, there are interested students who need to complete a bachelor's degree, which then usually requires four years of study. Then, they also must complete their law school and earn a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree.
However, you then become an attorney once you pass the bar exam and when you tend to enter the State Bar Association for the state in which you decide to practice law. You also need the 4 years of undergraduate study.
To learn more about the attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/15362752
#SPJ4
On a reality television show, the host tells the audience that, according to DNA tests, there is a 98.9 percent likelihood that Henry is the father of Jorge. What forensic idea does this BEST demonstrate? A. probability B. testimony C. identification D. comparison
Answers
Answer:
probability
Explanation:
Probability is the branch of mathematics concerning numerical descriptions of how likely an event is to occur, or how likely it is that a proposition is true. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where, roughly speaking, 0 indicates impossibility of the event and 1 indicates certainty.
This is an illustration of probability. As a result, Option (A) is the best decision.
What is probability?Mathematical representations of the likelihood that an event will happen or that a proposition is true are dealt with in the discipline of mathematics known as probability. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where 1 denotes certainty and 0 denotes the impossibility of the event. An event is more likely to occur the more likely it is that it will.
Tossing a fair (unbiased) coin is a straightforward demonstration. The coin is fair, therefore both "heads" and "tails" are equally likely to occur; as a result, the chance of each outcome is equal. Additionally, the chance of either occurring is 1/2 (sometimes written as 0.5 or 50%), as there are no other
Hence, Option (A) is accurate.
Learn more about probability, from:
brainly.com/question/9793303
#SPJ5
Do you think problem-solving courts are beneficial? Why or why not?
Answers
The problem-solving courts are beneficial or not may depend on numerous factors, like any kind of the specific needs of the community, the availability of any resources, and also the effectiveness of the court's programs and its interventions.
What are problem-solving courts?Problem solving courts are referred to as specialized courts that specifically aim to address all the underlying issues which usually contribute to any type of criminal behavior. These types of courts often offer treatment, counselling, and various other support services to help the defendants overcome challenges like addiction, mental illness, and homelessness.
Advocates practicing in these types of problem-solving courts usually argue that they can help in reducing recidivism rates, save money on incarceration costs, and also went on to provide more effective and compassionate justice.
Various researches has shown that problem-solving courts can be a very effective tool in reducing recidivism rates for certain type of populations, including drug offenders, veterans, and people with mental illness.
Apart from this, critics of these problem-solving courts often argue that these courts may be too lenient on offenders and that they also kind of divert resources away from traditional criminal justice approaches.
To know more about court refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30039981
Yes, problem-solving courts are beneficial because it helps in the rehabilitation of selected defendants.
What is the problem-solving courts?The problem-solving courts can be described as the court that helps in the supervision of the treatment as well as the rehabilitation of the defendants .
It should be noted that the court do help in the process of helping people especially in the behaviour of the people and how tyhey can be reintroduced into the society so that theycab change their behaviour in the sense that the can become a new person and a better person.
Learn more about courts at:
https://brainly.com/question/22499117
#SPJ1
At the pretrial conference the parties discuss settlement, and if they cannot reach one, then the attorneys and judge discuss: ________. (Choose ALL the correct answers)
Answers
At the pretrial conference, if the parties are unable to reach a settlement, the attorneys and judge may discuss several issues related to the upcoming trial. Some of the topics that may be discussed include:
The possibility of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods: The judge and attorneys may explore the possibility of using alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or arbitration to resolve the case without going to trial.
The scope and schedule of discovery: Discovery refers to the process of gathering evidence prior to trial. The judge and attorneys may discuss the scope and schedule of discovery, including deadlines for producing and exchanging documents, responding to interrogatories, and depositions.
Pretrial motions: Either party may file pretrial motions seeking to exclude evidence or dismiss part or all of the case before trial. The judge and attorneys may discuss any pending motions or the possibility of filing additional motions.
Jury selection: If the case will be decided by a jury, the judge and attorneys may discuss the process for selecting jurors and any potential challenges to particular jurors.
Trial logistics: Finally, the judge and attorneys may discuss the logistics of the trial itself, including how long it is expected to last, whether it will be held in front of a jury or just the judge, and any other practical considerations.
In summary, at the pretrial conference, if the parties cannot reach a settlement, the attorneys and judge may discuss a range of issues related to the upcoming trial, including alternative dispute resolution, discovery, pretrial motions, jury selection, and trial logistics.
learn more about pretrial conference here
https://brainly.com/question/31443867
#SPJ11
Explain the Rule of Law and explain its development on the American legal, political, and governmental system.
Answers
Answer:
The idea that those who govern must follow the laws; no one is above the law.
Explanation:
The Rule of Law has a huge impact on our government officials and institutions, from how they are held accountable (responsible) to how decisions are made to how laws are enforced! The Rule of Law protects us from tyranny (corrupt government) and is the foundation of liberty!
citi group 2 which of the following proposed studies would constitute human subjects research as defined under the federal regulations?
Answers
Studies that involve collecting survey data from people, interviewing participants, or observing public behavior would constitute human subjects research.
The federal regulations provide a broader definition of human subjects research, which includes the following:
Research that engages human subjects directly or indirectlyObtaining identifiable private information about living individualsResearch involving the use of human biological specimensResearch involving the use of intervention or interaction with the individual
Learn more about human subjects research at https://brainly.com/question/29675595
#SPJ11
Expliquen la siguiente frase: "La igualdad ante la ley no necesariamente garantiza igualdad de derechos para todas las personas cuando la ley está basada en un concepto restringido de ciudadanía". Ejemplifican con derecho al voto en la Argentina.
Answers
Answer:
Efectivamente, la igualdad ante la ley no garantiza igualdad de derechos para todas las personas, si dicha igualdad solo aplica a un determinado sector restringido de la población, como lo era la ciudadanía a comienzos del siglo pasado. En ese entonces, en Argentina, la ciudadanía solo era ostentada por hombres mayores de 18 años, quienes eran los únicos que podían ejercer derechos políticos, como el de votar o el de presentarse a cargos públicos. Las mujeres, en cambio, no eran consideradas como tales y por lo tanto no podían ejercer su derecho a sufragar, siendo desoídas en su voluntad política, hasta que en 1947, a través de la ley 13.010, que garantizó la igualdad de derechos políticos entre hombres y mujeres.
An assailant has stolen a woman's purse. What would be the most relevant fact for identifying the assailant's identity?
a. The assailant wore a jacket with "Mike's Cleaning" on it.
b. The woman's purse contained $1000 and a digital camera.
c. The assailant threatened the woman with a knife.
d. The assault took place in front of a bank.
Answers
in negligence cases, courts rarely grant group of answer choices special damages. compensatory damages. punitive damages. general damages.
Answers
In negligence cases, courts rarely grant punitive damages.
About Punitive damages
In some cases, punitive damages are given in lieu of actual losses. Punitive damages are viewed as punishment and are frequently granted just at court's discretion whenever the defendant's actions are judged to have caused particularly great injury. Normally, punitive damages are not granted in the context of a lawsuit for contract breach.
Punitive damages may be used by courts in cases of tort culpability. They normally won't, though, unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the defendant committed an intentional tort or acted wantonly and knowingly.
To know more about punitive damages:
brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ4
The claim (in law) that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way
Answers
The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."
What is the precedent claim?Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.
When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.
Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Why do you think a credit card company would agree to lend people money to buy things before they p ay for them