Which statement explains how the work of dorothea dix benefited u. S. Society?
Answers
The statement that explains how the work of Dorothea Dix benefited U.S. society is: Dorothea Dix's advocacy for the mentally ill and prison reform led to improved conditions, increased awareness, and the establishment of state-run mental institutions in the United States.
Dorothea Dix was a social reformer in the 19th century who dedicated her life to advocating for the rights of the mentally ill and prisoners. Her work greatly benefited U.S. society through the following steps:
1. Investigation and documentation: Dix started by visiting jails and almshouses, where she documented the inhumane living conditions of mentally ill individuals and prisoners. She then presented her findings to the public and lawmakers.
2. Raising awareness: Through her presentations and publications, Dix raised public awareness of the terrible conditions faced by the mentally ill and prisoners, and she promoted the idea that they deserved better treatment and care.
3. Advocating for change: Dix lobbied state legislatures and the U.S. Congress to allocate funding for the establishment of state-run mental institutions. Her efforts led to the creation of more than 30 mental hospitals and other institutions for the mentally ill in various states.
4. Improving conditions: As a result of her advocacy, the living conditions and treatment of mentally ill individuals and prisoners improved significantly. The establishment of mental institutions provided more humane living conditions and proper medical care, reducing the suffering of those affected.
In summary, Dorothea Dix's work benefited U.S. society by improving the lives of mentally ill individuals and prisoners, raising public awareness, and promoting the establishment of state-run mental institutions for better treatment and care.
To know more about Dorothea Dix refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30264816#
#SPJ11
Related Questions
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on
what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to
try to get each side to explain its point of view?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
As a Supreme Court justice, my initial reactions to the situation would depend on the specific details and context of the case at hand. However, when considering the War Powers Act, it is important to evaluate the roles and powers of each branch of government involved in order to determine which branch may be in the right.
The War Powers Act is designed to address the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches regarding the use of military force. It sets guidelines for the president's authority to deploy troops without a declaration of war and imposes certain reporting requirements to Congress.
In this case, I would assess whether the president's actions in deploying troops align with the provisions and limitations outlined in the War Powers Act. I would carefully consider the extent of the president's powers as commander-in-chief and whether they have been exceeded, leading to a potential infringement on Congress's authority to declare war or provide authorization for military actions.
During oral arguments, I would ask both sides to explain their respective points of view. To the executive branch, I would inquire about the legal justification and rationale for the deployment of troops, seeking clarification on the specific provisions of the War Powers Act that were considered in making the decision. I would also ask whether the president followed the required reporting procedures to Congress.
To the legislative branch, I would inquire about their interpretation of the War Powers Act and whether they believe the president's actions exceeded his authority. I would seek explanations regarding their understanding of Congress's role in declaring war or authorizing military actions and how they believe the president's actions align or deviate from these constitutional provisions.
Additional questions could include seeking clarification on the immediacy and necessity of the deployment, the potential national security implications, the presence of any ongoing threat, and the extent of consultation and communication between the executive and legislative branches.
Through these questions, I would aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of the legal arguments, constitutional implications, and factual circumstances surrounding the case to make an informed decision in accordance with the War Powers Act and the principles of checks and balances outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
Name three of the new weapons used in World War I and explain how they were more deadly.
Answers
Answer:
Some large artillery guns could launch shells nearly 80 miles. Machine gun - The machine gun was improved during the war. It was made much lighter and easier to move around. Flame throwers - Flame throwers were used by the German Army on the western front in order to force the enemy out of their trenches.
Explanation:
Why are federal judges appointed for life?
To ensure freedom from control by elected officials
To ensure freedom from control by elected officials
To attract people with experience to the job
To attract people with experience to the job
To guarantee that states retain their powers
To guarantee that states retain their powers
To protect the wishes of the majority of citizens
Answers
Answer:
a) To ensure freedom from control by elected officials
Explanation:
Constitutionally (Article III), federal judges are appointed for life. The Constitution gives federal judges employment security so they may resolve cases without public or political pressure. Even if they make unfavorable judgments, federal judges can only be impeached.
They are sheltered from the political process yet being young and inexperienced encourages judges to remain on the bench long after good reason would have retired them. According to Eastman and UT professor Stephen Vladeck, term restrictions might diminish independence and let money influence the system. If judges were obliged to retire at 60, some industry or interest may have employed them later.
(scenario: the united states and germany) use scenario: the united states and germany. given this information, the country that has the absolute advantage in barley is , and the country that has the absolute advantage in aluminum is .
Answers
The United States has an absolute advantage in producing barley, while Germany has an absolute advantage in producing aluminum.
Suppose that the United States and Germany are considering a potential trade agreement. After conducting a thorough analysis of their respective industries, it is determined that the United States has an absolute advantage in producing barley, while Germany has an absolute advantage in producing aluminum.
This means that the United States can produce barley at a lower cost than Germany, while Germany can produce aluminum at a lower cost than the United States. As a result, it makes sense for the United States to focus on producing and exporting barley, while Germany focuses on producing and exporting aluminum.
Through a trade agreement, the United States could import aluminum from Germany at a lower cost than it could produce it domestically, while Germany could import barley from the United States at a lower cost than it could produce it domestically.
This would benefit both countries by allowing them to specialize in the industries where they have a comparative advantage, and by increasing the overall efficiency and productivity of their economies.
The U.S. has an absolute advantage in producing barley, while Germany has an absolute advantage in producing aluminum.
For more questions on barley, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5390345
#SPJ11
The immediate spark for hostilities in Europe in 1914 was
A. a struggle between European powers for control of the international diamond trade.
B. the sinking of the British passenger liner Lusitania.
C. the death of Otto von Bismarck in Germany.
D. the German invasion of Poland.
E. the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
Answers
Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria, was killed. So, the right choice is E.
The First World War began in 1914 and lasted until 1918, with a variety of potential causes and conflicting goals. Millions of people have perished in this perplexing battle that has spread across the globe. By carefully examining global trends that had developed over a number of years, historians have often investigated a variety of techniques to address the complexity of the First World War's roots.
Yet, the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on the territory that was simultaneously claimed by Serbia and Austria served as the initial reason for the war.
The murder of the Archduke marked the official beginning of World War I. Due to Austria's intense resentment at Gavrilo Princip's shooting of the Archduke, Austria declared war on Serbia, which ultimately resulted in World War I. In 1915, the Lusitania was sunk, and World War 2 began with the German invasion of Poland.
To know more about Franz Ferdinand, click the below link
https://brainly.com/question/1077890
#SPJ4
As a historian, how should we remember the time period we refer to as “The Renaissance?”
Answers
What was the government created and is still the government of the United States
Answers
Answer:
there is a new governor so... yeah
Explanation:
. What type of peace was proposed in the “Peace Without Victory” speech?
Answers
Answer:
An Agreement Built on Quicksand
Explanation:
In his congressional address, he outlined a vision for a just and peaceful world including freedom of the seas, and an international agreement to avoid arms races while positioning the United States to act as a mediating force when calling for peace without victory.
In what year were California Condors reintroduced to the wild
Answers
Answer:
it was in 1992 hope this will help you guys
who invented a new type of steam engine in 1781 that allowed the steam engine to be used in factories?
Answers
The Circuit Courts Act of 1891 accomplished which of the following? (MARK ALL THAT APPLY)
a. Gave SCOTUS certiorari jurisdiction over cases in the Courts of Appeal
b. Established U.S. Courts of Appeals
c. Expanded the mandatory jurisdiction of SCOTUS
Answers
Answer: A and B
A. Gave SCOTUS certiorari jurisdiction over cases in the Courts of Appeals
B. Established U.S. Courts of Appeals
What is the author's purpose for organizing the text this way?
Answers
The text structure allows an author to present information in a specific way to support his or her argument is the author's purpose for organizing the text this way. Thus, option (c) is correct.
Simply said, text organization or structure refers to the technique and manner in which an author arranges a text for improved intelligibility. An author can emphasize key ideas, highlight crucial details, and offer proof to back their claims by structuring the text in a particular way.
An author can make the material more understandable and beneficial for readers by employing a particular text arrangement. A text may be structured in a variety of ways, including:
categorizationexplanationcause and effectproblem/solution, etcAs a result, the significance of the author's purpose for organizing the text this way are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on author's, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9260046
#SPJ1
What is the author's purpose for organizing the text this way?
The text structure allows an author to explain information in a formal way.
The text structure allows an author to have a specific point of view.
The text structure allows an author to present information in a specific way to support his or her argument.
The text structure allows an author to avoid having a tone in his or her writing.
the best treatment for diabetes about 1915 was known as:
Answers
The best treatment for diabetes about 1915 was known as starvation diets.
Ten years before insulin was discovered, prominent American physicians Frederick Allen and Elliott Joslin advocated strict fasting and malnutrition to prolong the lives of diabetics. Detractors called it a "starvation diet," and some patients actually starved to death. Allen and Jocelyn promoted the treatment as the desperate application of animal experimentation for clinical treatment, and the text still describes it as such. This excuse is exaggerated.
To know more about diabetes click on the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/27183373
#SPJ4
how did the athenian government select representatives from each tribe?
Answers
Explanation:
The Council of 500 represented the full-time government of Athens. ... The Council would meet to discuss and vote on “Preliminary decrees” (probouleumata, προβουλεύματα), and any of these that passed the Council's vote went on for discussion and voting in the Assembly.
Which of the following was developed by the Maya civilization?
A
the compass
B.
the alphabet
C.
land maps
D.
an accurate calendar
Reset
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The Mayans created an accurate calendar that was based upon the sun and astronomy.
can somebody help me with activity 3 ?
Answers
Answer:
the first and last image are literary sources, the helmet and the guy he points to are not literary sources.
Brainliest to first person to answer, plz I need answer fast!!!!
What grounds did Texas have for claiming the Rio Grande River as its border with Mexico?
Answers
Answer:
southern boarder
Explanation:
sorry if im wrong, but im pretty sure thats it
Answer:
southern boarder
Explanation:
MARK BRAINLEST PLS
Sometimes residential zoning can be divided into two types. What are these types?
Answers
Answer:
commercial ,industrial
Explanation:
Answer:
1, attached 2. detached
Explanation:
its talking about apartment complexes town houses etc vs a normal house
What is the difference between historical and legendary warrior women? Give an example of a historical woman warrior and explain your selection.
Answers
The amazons, Freida's, Boudica 2.Who are some legendary warrior women? Valkyries.
Answer:
pan from dragon ball gt
Explanation:
Why was the Siege of Vicksburg a turning point in the Civil War?
A.
It proved the North had smart generals.
B.
It allowed enslaved people to escape to freedom.
C.
It was the Union's first victory.
D.
It split Confederate forces in two.
Answers
it provide the North had smart generals
The Siege of Vicksburg was a turning point in the Civil War it split Confederate forces in two. The correct option is D.
An important military operation during the American Civil War was the siege of Vicksburg, which lasted from May to July 1863. Under the direction of General Ulysses S. Grant, the Union forces surrounded the Confederate stronghold of Vicksburg, Mississippi. The city was a crucial strategic location controlling the Mississippi River, and it was held by the Confederate forces under the command of General John C. Pemberton.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about The Civil War here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ7
How do we meet other cultures?
Answers
Answer:
by going to each others countries and explore it
Explanation:
major movement of modem and pioneered by jackson pollock in the 1940s and 1950s. true or false
Answers
False. The major movement of modern art pioneered by Jackson Pollock in the 1940s and 1950s is known as Abstract Expressionism, not modem.
Abstract Expressionism was a prominent art movement characterized by its emphasis on spontaneous, gestural, and non-representational forms. Jackson Pollock was one of the leading figures of this movement, known for his unique style of drip painting.
He would fling and pour paint onto canvases, creating intricate and energetic compositions. Pollock's work, along with other Abstract Expressionist artists, challenged traditional notions of art and paved the way for future developments in contemporary art.The movement of Abstract Expressionism emerged in the post-World War II era and is often associated with the New York School.
It sought to convey the artists' inner emotions and personal experiences through their abstract and expressive works. By pouring, splattering, and dripping paint onto the canvas, Pollock introduced a sense of spontaneity and chance into his compositions.
Learn more about Traditional notions click here:
brainly.com/question/30410660
#SPJ11
Which organization was dedicated to doing humanitarian and charitable work for the African American community? (1
Answers
Answer:
International Relief/Development/Peace
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ME I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answers
Answer:
It helped society be more equal because "protest" were being held and people took it more seriously and noticed how much they were fighting for equality.
Explanation:
What Indian chief refused to give up territory near the Great Lakes without a fight?
Answers
Answer:
Tecumseh
Explanation:
i am not entirely sure, but i remember he was a warrior chief who tried to stop white settlement in the northwest territory which today is the Great Lakes region.
What are religion based governments
Answers
Answer:
Religion based governments are, as the name is, governments that revolve around a certain religion and follow it's morals/rules.
Explanation:
Answer:
Theocracy
Explanation:
Theocracy is a form of government in which a deity of some type is recognized as the supreme ruling authority, giving divine guidance to human intermediaries that manage the day-to-day affairs of the government.
Which of the following called for African Americans to '' pull themselves up from their own boostraps'?
Answers
Answer:
Booker T. Washington
Explanation:
Answer:
Booker T. Washington
Explanation:
Booker T. Washington called for African Americans to '' pull themselves up from their own boostraps''
All of the following were results of the Missouri Compromise EXCEPT
O sectionalism was reduced.
extremists in both the North and South were not satisfied
the balance between the North and South was kept even
Maine entered the Union as a free state
Answers
Answer:
O sectionalism was reduced.
Explanation:
All of the following were results of the Missouri Compromise except nationalism was reduced. The correct option is a.
What is the Missouri Compromise?The Missouri Compromise was a federal legislation of the United States that balanced the desires of northern states to prevent the expansion of slavery in the country with those of southern states to expand it. It admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state and declared a policy of prohibiting slavery in the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands north of the 36°30′ parallel.
The 16th United States Congress passed the legislation on March 3, 1820, and President James Monroe signed it on March 6, 1820. Earlier, in February 1819, Representative James Tallmadge Jr., a Democratic-Republican Jeffersonian Republican from New York, had submitted two amendments to Missouri's request for statehood that included restrictions on slavery.
Southerners objected to any bill that imposed federal restrictions on slavery and believed that it was a state issue, as settled by the Constitution.
Learn more about Missouri, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11188979
#SPJ2
Which bill cause the government to assume approximately $15 million in debt from farmers in the Oklahoma territory
Answers
The Burleson-McCumber Act of 1922 was the law that led to the federal government taking up around $15 million in debt from farmers in the Oklahoma Territory. This law was created to help farmers who were struggling financially as a result of declining crop prices and excessive debt levels.
"United States of America" is the entire name of the country. There is just one name listed federal government in the Constitution, and it is the name that is used on currency, in treaties, and in court law proceedings in which the country is a party. In official documents, the words
"Government of the United States of America" or "United States Government" are frequently used to distinguish the federal government from all the states taken together.
Learn more about federal government , from :
brainly.com/question/24049224
#SPJ1
why is canada called a dominion instead of monarchy
Answers
Answer:
Because The Queen is considered to be a constitutional monarch, meaning it acts only with the Canadian government ministers. In a complete monarchy, the ruler is like the only person in charge, without the need of anyone. Well today, Canada isn't considered to be a dominion, maybe cause they feel offended, but are now called the member of the commonwealth.