Evidence may be withheld during discovery if it is: (Check all that apply.)Multiple select question.1) difficult to find and copy.2) embarrassing to one of parties.3) not relevant to the dispute.4) protected by legal privilege

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen did not ensure equal rights for women.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, adopted in 1789 during the French Revolution, was a significant document that laid the foundation for individual rights and liberties. Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen  included several key provisions such as free speech, equal access to the law, and equal taxation.

These principles aimed to provide a fair and just society, where every citizen had an equal opportunity to participate in decision-making processes and enjoy the benefits of the nation.
However, one aspect that the Declaration did not explicitly address was equal rights for women  which remained an issue that needed to be addressed in the following years. The document was a crucial step forward in promoting individual liberties, but it still had limitations in achieving complete equality for all members of society.

While the document promoted the idea of universal rights and equality, it did not specifically mention or ensure gender equality. At the time, women were still largely considered to be inferior to men in various aspects of society, such as politics, education, and the workplace.

For more such questions on Equal rights for women, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29986355

#SPJ11

In Timothy v. Keetch, the case in the text, the court held that Utah law requires one to inspect the public record to verify the truthfulness of statements made to him or her. The statement is true.

The case Timothy v. Keetch was a legal dispute between Mr. Keetch and Mr. Timothy regarding the sale of a house. Mr. Timothy claimed that Mr. Keetch misled him by stating that the house was built on 10 acres of land. In reality, the house was built on only 2.63 acres of land.

Mr. Timothy sued Mr. Keetch for fraud. However, the Utah Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. Keetch, stating that Timothy failed to inspect the public record to verify the truthfulness of the statements made by Keetch. Therefore, Utah law requires one to inspect the public record to verify the truthfulness of statements made to him or her.

The court noted that Mr. Timothy had access to the public records, which would have shown that the house was only built on 2.63 acres of land. As a result, the court held that Mr. Timothy was responsible for his own negligence and could not hold Mr. Keetch responsible for it.

To learn more about Utah law

https://brainly.com/question/30559664

#SPJ11

The committee on Energy and Natural Resources would be responsible for legislation regarding acquiring alternative fuel sources from us lands.

A committee or commission is a frame of one or greater folks subordinate to a deliberative meeting. A committee isn't always itself taken into consideration to be a form of assembly. commonly, the meeting sends matters right into a committee as a manner to explore them extra absolutely than might be possible if the assembly itself were thinking about them.

Committees, the maximum formal of those types of paintings corporations, are groups of men and women appointed or selected to carry out a function on behalf of a bigger institution. In a experience, the bigger body entrusts a smaller subset of participants to do something for them.

Learn more about committee here:https://brainly.com/question/24360512
#SPJ4

Answer:

c

Explanation:

edge 2022

(A) The Florida court that would have jurisdiction over the felony DUI charge filed against Barney Gumble is the circuit court located in the county where the offense occurred. In this case, if Barney Gumble was arrested for a felony DUI in Miami-Dade County, then the circuit court in Miami-Dade County would have jurisdiction over the case.

(B) The reason why the circuit court in the county where the offense occurred has jurisdiction over the case is because Florida law gives jurisdiction to the court in the county where the crime was committed. This means that the court in that county has the legal authority to hear the case, make decisions, and impose penalties if the defendant is found guilty.

(C) In a criminal proceeding, the plaintiff is the state or government body that is bringing charges against the defendant. In this case, the plaintiff would be the State of Florida, as represented by the prosecutor's office in the county where the offense occurred. The defendant would be Barney Gumble, who is accused of committing the felony DUI offense.

The burden of proof rests with the plaintiff, who must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Barney Gumble committed the crime with which he is charged. If the prosecution fails to meet this burden of proof, then the defendant will be acquitted and released from custody.

learn more about jurisdiction here

https://brainly.com/question/31921775

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

C

The answer is C, ​became effective on May 5th. Prior to the 5th, our subject Sam was not aware of the revocation. On the 5th, when Sam received the letter, Ralph at that point had officially revoked the offer.

I hope I've helped! :)

Security incident indicators that deserve aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.

A Security incident indicators refers to indicator that signifies that a security has been compromised or have been in process of being compromised.

In conclusion, the Security incident indicators that deserve  aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.

Read more about Security incident indicators

brainly.com/question/25164014

Having faith in your ability to complete the task, working diligently to correct your flaws, and understanding that mastery may never truly be attained.

Even when it seems like you are making no progress, practice is essential for mastery. Knowing how the journey towards Mastery functions really aids in taking it. In essence, competence is that enigmatic process that occurs as something initially challenging becomes increasingly simple and enjoyable with repetition.

Allowing up some of your classroom management and giving your students more authority is the single most difficult hard achievement that mastery learning entails. The learners, not your daily schedule, will determine how quickly the class moves forward and what projects they are working on.

To learn more about Mastery visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3130086

#SPJ4

Answer:

Other implementation decisions: The Department of Education's decision to require states to adopt Common Core standards for education is an example of an implementation decision that aims to improve education outcomes nationwide.

Judicial decisions: In the case of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court's decision to declare segregation in public schools unconstitutional was a landmark judicial decision that had a significant impact on public policy and civil rights in the United States.

Explanation:

Answer:

The most common types of background checks search for criminal activity, verify employment and education, including identity verification, and request driving records. Some employers also review credit, and social media, and conducted drug tests.

Explanation:

Answer:

$0.78 i think

Explanation:

Answer:

12.235

Explanation:

BECAUSE

Answer:

File in the appellate court

Explanation:

If you lose in a circuit court, the next step is to take the case (or file) with an appellate court

According to Souryal's typology, probation and parole officers who fall under the "enforcer" category may need to examine their use of authority.

According to Souryal's typology, probation and parole officers who fall under the "enforcer" category may need to examine their use of authority. Enforcers are officers who tend to be more authoritarian in their approach, relying on punishment and control to maintain order and compliance. This can lead to a reliance on their authority and power, potentially causing them to overstep their boundaries and violate the rights of those under their supervision. It is important for enforcer officers to examine their use of authority and ensure that they are not abusing their power or violating the rights of those they are tasked with supervising. This can involve implementing a more balanced and collaborative approach, where the officer works with the offender to address underlying issues and promote positive behavior change. In summary, probation and parole officers falling under the enforcer category need to be mindful of their use of authority and ensure that it is used appropriately and in the best interest of their clients.

To know more about parole officers visit: https://brainly.com/question/28762983

#SPJ11

Answer:

Every 48 minutes

Explanation:

d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.

The correct answer is d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.

The state law prohibiting ships from discharging specified pollutants into navigable waterways is necessary for the important state interest of preventing pollution. Additionally, there are no reasonable alternatives available. The law does not discriminate against interstate commerce, as it applies to all ships regardless of their state of origin. Furthermore, the benefits of the law to the state in preventing pollution outweigh the burdens it imposes on interstate commerce. Therefore, the ship owner's challenge of the state law as unconstitutional would not be successful.

For more details of Congress :

https://brainly.com/question/10037853

#SPJ11

Both the Democratic and Republican parties have an impact on the Executive Branch of the US government, particularly in terms of how the President and their administration implement policies and make decisions.

Democratic platforms work to advance social programs, labor unions, product safety, workplace safety laws, equality of opportunity, disability rights, racial equity, environmental pollution controls, and criminal justice reform.

When a President from either party is elected, they generally appoint officials who are aligned with their political beliefs to key positions within the Executive Branch. These officials, such as Cabinet Secretaries and other high-level advisors, can help shape the President's policies and priorities.

The political party of the President and their administration can have a significant impact on the Executive Branch, including the formulation and implementation of policies, the appointment of officials, and the nomination of judges.

Learn more about the Democrats here:

https://brainly.com/question/14320124

#SPJ9

The act of remembering is like putting puzzle pieces together, the article claims. Why is memory similar to a puzzle? Because our minds try to rearrange data over time, recollection is like a puzzle. Because our minds try to rearrange data over time, recollection is like a puzzle.

According to memory expert and psychologist Elizabeth Loftus, recalling information is "more analogous to putting puzzle pieces together than retrieving a video tape," as she wrote in a 2010 article for Scientific American. These schemas could be influenced by bias and social values to some extent. Schemas are therefore capable of 'fitting in' with our preexisting knowledge.

To learn more about memory, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/14829385

#SPJ1

Answer:

Statutes.

Explanation:

Answer:

What methods would you use to collect job analysis data? 2. You work in the human resource department of a large brewery in Atlantic Canada. You are in the process of writing job descriptions for all managerial and supervisory staff. One manager who is in the production division of the brewery refuses to complete a job analysis questionnaire.

Explanation:

The individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement is a description of an abuse and social services manager. Option A. This is further explained below.

Generally, Social services are simply defined as services provided to groups that aid in the development of individuals.

In conclusion, A description of abuse and social services manager includes the ability to examine an organization and adopt strategies for improvement.

Read more about social services

https://brainly.com/question/15059623

#SPJ2

Answer:

bad really bad that my answer

Answer: goodddd

Explanation:

The agreement may occasionally be subject to the approval of a third party. A contract that commits two or more parties to carrying out or refraining from performing an action now or in the future.

A third party is not considered a party to the agreement just because they have the legal ability to enforce it. The third party merely has the same legal rights to sue regarding the contract as if they were a party to it, including the right to seek damages or an injunction.

This illustrative clause completely precludes the application of the Contracts (Third Party Rights) Act. It takes an artistic skill to construct provisions like this that offer rights to third parties rather than exclude them. It depends on the rights that are to be awarded, who is to receive them, and the restrictions placed on those rights.

The risk that the parties to a contract take on increases when third parties are given rights under the agreement.

To know more about Contract visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22440306

#SPJ4

Answer: free food from livestock raised by Heifer International

Explanation:

Federal discounts on liquor purchases is NOT a benefit to licensees of RAMP compliance. The corrct option is f.

For licensees, RAMP compliance has a number of advantages. For example, if the licensee was compliant at the time of the violation and had no citations for similar offenses in the previous four years, the fines and penalties for serving minors or visibly intoxicated customers may be reduced. A licensee may also qualify for discounts on liquor liability insurance, recognition in the community as a responsible licensee, and a decreased risk of Dram Shop liability.

Additionally, RAMP guarantees knowledgeable and well-trained management and staff improving security and responsible alcohol service practices. It is crucial to remember that RAMP compliance does not entitle consumers to federal discounts on booze purchases because those are unrelated to the program for the responsible management of alcohol.

learn more about RAMP compliance here

brainly.com/question/31541357

#SPJ2

Answer:

Environmental should be the answer

Explanation:

Answer:

depends on if "helping " resulted in doing something illegal, then yes. commit a crime, despite the reason, you should be charged

Explanation:

Answer:

Well honestly it depends on the situation.

Explanation:

You shouldn't be charged with committing a crime if you are just standing there cause you could make it worse, and could be tried for obstruction.

2. No they shouldn't be charged cause they had good intentions. But that's for a jury to decide and the evidence.

POLICE PO PAPA KO WALA SHARE KO LANG HEHE

Due to the strong enforcement of traditional gender roles in the US at the time, women were historically discouraged from pursuing higher education. She intended the change to benefit some people.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was one of just 9 women accepted into Harvard Law School when she was younger. To put things into perspective, Harvard at that time welcomed about 500 new students yearly.

It was very difficult to get high paid jobs at the time, even for highly educated women. The majority of businesses simply hire women for secretarial positions without giving them the option to advance to managerial positions.

However, Ruth Bader Ginsburg eventually rose to the position of supreme court justice.

Learn more about Justice Ginsburg here

https://brainly.com/question/19556210

# SPJ 3

Answer:

False.

Reason:

it seems to make sense that you can talk about the case out side the court room.

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Answer:

The equal protection clause prevents the state government from enacting criminal laws that discriminate in an unreasonable and unjustified manner. The Fifth Amendment due process clause prohibits the federal government from discrimination if the discrimination is so unjustifiable that it violates due process of law.

Explanation: