Which statement best describes the Anti-Federalist view of the Constitution?

1.) The Constitution gave too much power to a central government.

2.) The Constitution gave most of the governing authority to the states.

3.) The Constitution set up a monarchy similar to Britain.

4.) The Constitution did not give the military enough power.

Answer

1954

Explanation

thanks for point

Answer:

1954, Jacksonville, Florida

Answer:

Internal resistance refers to the opposition to the flow of current offered by the cells and batteries themselves resulting in the generation of heat. Internal resistance is measured in Ohms. The relationship between internal resistance (r) and emf (e) of cell s given by. e = I (r + R)

Answer:Jefferson adopted John Locke's theory of natural rights to provide a reason for revolution. He then went on to offer proof that revolution was necessary in 1776 to end King George's tyranny over the colonists.

Explanation:

Answer:

Introductory: Many historians today believe that some of the causes of World War II can be traced to World War I (1914-1918). Americans had fought in that earlier war to “Make the world safe for Democracy.” Those were the words and goals of President Woodrow Wilson (President from 1913 to 1921). However, the peace treaties that ended World War I seemed only to create in many people and governments, bitterness and anger that eventually boiled over and helped in still the inevitable beginnings of World War II.

Germany and its allies had been defeated in World War I. Germany was ordered to hand over one sixth of its territory and forced to pay huge reparations (payments by a defeated country for the destruction it caused in a war). After World War I, Germany suffered from high unemployment and uncontrollable inflation which made the German money become almost worthless.

There were numerous causes to the War itself; however, the most important cause in my opinion was World War 1 in and of itself. After the First World War, the actively involved nations were divided into two groups; the Allied Powers, formed by France, British Empire, Russian Empire, United States of America etc.

What events led to World War 1?

The immediate cause of World War I that made the aforementioned items come into play (alliances, imperialism, militarism, nationalism) was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. In June 1914, a Serbian-nationalist terrorist group called the Black Hand sent groups to assassinate the Archduke.

Historic background discussing WWII

World War II began in Europe on September 1, 1939, when Germany invaded Poland. Great Britain and France responded by declaring war on Germany on September 3. The war between the U.S.S.R. and Germany began on June 22, 1941, with the German invasion of the Soviet Union.

Broad statement about why WWII may have been inevitable

It was avoidable if there had been a consensus between Britain & France to confront Hitler, militarily, as they became aware of the massive German re-armament program - which was clearly not intended for “defense.” But they did not do so.

Why? In Britain there was a sense of “guilt” over the harsh & destructive terms of the Treaty of Versailles (1919), which Hitler exploited to the full.

Conclusion Paragraph

World War Two, the second major international conflict in a matter of decades, was nothing short of a wholesale assault on the ideals of civilization. This is not an exaggeration. Let us look at some of the numbers, which reflect the devastation. Worldwide, it is estimated that 70 million people died as a result of the Second World War. In Europe, the ratio of military to civilian deaths was also lopsided. The Dutch, in resisting the Nazi advance of 1940, suffered around 15,000 deaths. All told, the Dutch lost over 100,000 civilians during the war along with another 100,000 Jews. Poland was even worse off. The Poles lost a quarter of a million soldiers in a valiant attempt to slow the Nazi Blitzkrieg, but this was nothing in relation to the nearly two and half million Polish civilian death and the three million Polish Jews who died in the Nazi ghettos and extermination camps.

Explanation:

France hoped to end years of chaos by installing Louis Napoleon Bonaparte as a leader in 1848.

Louis Napoleon, the nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte, was elected as the President of the French Republic in December 1848. The country was facing a lot of problems at the time, including political instability, economic crisis, and social unrest.

Louis Napoleon promised to bring stability to the country and restore order. He was seen as a strong leader who could unite the country and bring about the reforms needed to improve the lives of the people. He also promised to promote economic growth and create jobs.

Under Louis Napoleon's leadership, France experienced a period of relative stability and prosperity. He introduced a series of reforms that improved the lives of the working class and helped to boost the economy. He also embarked on a program of public works, which included the construction of new roads, bridges, and buildings.

Overall, Louis Napoleon's tenure as leader of France brought a period of stability and economic growth, but it also raised questions about the limits of democracy and the role of the monarchy in French politics.

Know more about Louis Napoleon Bonaparte here:

https://brainly.com/question/2137317

#SPJ11

Answer:

the Native American tribes were exposed to new diseases from the settlers, ones that their bodies could not fight. hope this helps

Explanation:

Many of the Choctaw died during the journey, and those that survived arrived at the new territory in poor condition

Answer:

What did Winfield Scott and Zachary Taylor have in common? Check all of the boxes that apply.

Both were veterans of the War of 1812.

Both led US troops in Mexico.

Both ran for president of the United States as members of the Whig Party.

Both were elected president.

Both lost key battles during the war against Mexico.

DONE

Answer:

I believe Mrs. Geist should instruct her students to read three books on aging and health. This would allow them to get a grasp of how the science of aging and health has been progressed since the Scientific Revolution from three different perspectives. Depending on who the books are written by, I think the students could learn a lot from true testimonials or scientific studies backed by research that contain data. These books could promote an opportunity for students to grab an enormous amount of information that attempt to answer the question asked.

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Mrs. Geist instructing her class to interview three healthy older people

The phrase "Pax Romana," which means "Roman peace," refers to the era of the Roman Empire from 27 B.C.E. to 180 C.E. In the Empire, which stretched from England in the north to Morocco in the south and Iraq in the east, there was unheard-of calm and economic prosperity over this 200-year period.

Rome's government expanded its authority during the Pax Romana. This was a prosperous time for trade and communication. A "golden age" was lived through by the Romans. The fields of engineering, literature, science, and the arts all made significant advances.

Caesar Augustus, the first Roman Empire, is allegedly represented in this statue. Gaius Octavius, who later became Caesar Augustus, was born in 63 BCE.

Learn more about the Roman Empire here:

https://brainly.com/question/27985217

#SPJ1

Answer:

Before I explain the reason why Israel lost its enthusiasm for rebuilding the Temple I would like to explain the reason that led to the rebuilding of the temple. To begin with, the Jews were captured by the Romans and then were released with orders. Cyrus II who was the founder of the Achaemenian dynasty told all Jews to return to Jerusalem to rebuild the Temple. Then Israel lost its enthusiasm for rebuilding the Temple.  During the years between the laying of the Temple foundations and the resuming of the work, the people lost the excitement they had from the beginning. Instead of wanting to build the house of the lord they wanted homes for themselves.

As believers, we should continue to strive to learn more about God and his second coming because we need to be ready and in the bible, all the keys to doing that are right there. We need to remember that God knows exactly what is going on in this world but he promises strength and guidance to all who believe. Believing in Christ is not just an act it's a way of living. It's knowing that whatever happens your faith will still remain in Christ. In the bible, God speaks of things to do while we wait for his second coming and those include keeping the faith, turning from your sin, and praying. One verse in the bible that really explains what to do while we wait is in Hebrews 10:25 and it says Hebrews 10:25 instructs, “Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another — and all the more as you see the Day [of Christ's return] approaching.”

Explanation:

I'm really late but for anyone else who needs this here, you go!

The Jews were initially taken prisoner by the Romans, who later ordered their release. All Jews were instructed to return to Jerusalem so that the Temple could be rebuilt by Cyrus II, the founder of the Achaemenian Empire. Israel then lost interest in constructing a new Temple.

The enthusiasm among the populace waned throughout the years between the foundation-laying of the Temple and the start of construction. They desired dwellings for themselves rather than the Lord's house, which was their goal. The Bible has all the information we need to be prepared, therefore as Christians, we should continue to work to learn more about God and his second coming.

Though God is fully aware of all that is happening in this world, he nonetheless offers those who trust in his strength and direction. Faith in Christ is a way of life, not merely an act. Knowing that your faith will endure despite whatever occurs.

Learn more about Bible here:

https://brainly.com/question/23570286

#SPJ3

Answer:

explanation:

not sure, I'm no good at criminology or whatsoever but pls feel free to correct or report me if I'm wrong:))

Answer: Option 1: Archeological findings of foreign items

Explanation:  

Source:   https://heritagesciencejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40494-020-00425-9

The Compromise of 1877 reconstruction came to an end when Confederate forces were withdrawn from the South to settle a contentious presidential election.

To learn more about the Compromise of 1877 visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1373910

#SPJ4

Wisconsin's pilot testing of Workfare and Learnfare in the early 1990s was an important step in the federal government's welfare reform efforts in 1996.

Workfare required recipients to work or participate in job training activities in order to receive benefits, while Learnfare required parents to ensure that their children attended school in order to receive benefits. These programs helped the federal government reform its major welfare program by incentivizing work, encouraging education, and providing more structure to the welfare system.

The success of the Wisconsin pilot programs provided the federal government with evidence needed to justify the changes they would eventually take. These changes would lead to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, which aimed to increase self-sufficiency and reduce poverty by requiring work, training, and other activities for individuals to receive benefits.

To know more about welfare system., click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29916471

#SPJ4

Answer:

B) movement

if its right can i get brainliest

It seems like you are asking about the debates over slavery and representation in the United States Congress during the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

At that time, there were two main positions on how slaves should be counted for representation in Congress. Delegates from the North generally believed that slaves should not be counted at all, while delegates from the South believed that slaves should be counted as full persons.

Here are some possible statements that each delegate might have made:

Delegate from the North:

- "Slaves are not citizens and should not be counted for representation in Congress."

- "Counting slaves as full persons would give slaveholding states an unfair advantage in Congress."

- "If we count slaves as full persons, we would be rewarding states that have built their economies on slavery."

Delegate from the South:

- "Slaves are people too and should be counted as such for representation in Congress."

- "Counting slaves as less than full persons would be a violation of their human rights."

- "If we don't count slaves as full persons, we would be punishing states that have invested in slavery."

These statements reflect the growing division in attitudes toward slavery at the time.

Answer:

American entry into World War II was not inevitable, but it was highly likely.

Explanation:

The United States had significant economic and strategic interests in both Europe and Asia, and it was increasingly obvious that Germany and Japan intended to enlarge their spheres of influence at the expense of the United States and its allies.

The decision to join World War II on both the European and Pacific fronts was made by the United States.

After carefully weighing the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative, it was decided that the United States could not afford to let either Germany or Japan achieve its objectives without endangering its own security.

Learn more about American entry into World War II from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/31024704

1) Yes, archaeology has useful applications to enrich the present and inform our path into the future by providing insights into past human cultures, behaviors, and technologies, which can help us understand the origins of current societal patterns and make more informed decisions for the future.

2. Pseudoscience and science differ in their methodology and reliability, with science being a superior mode of explaining the world due to its reliance on empirical evidence, rigorous testing, peer review, and adherence to the scientific method.

Archaeology has the potential to offer valuable lessons and perspectives that can benefit the present and future. By studying past human societies through the analysis of artifacts, structures, and other remains, archaeologists can shed light on the development and evolution of various cultural practices, technologies, and social systems. This knowledge can provide us with a deeper understanding of our own roots and heritage, enabling us to make more informed choices about our present actions and future directions. Additionally, archaeology can contribute to fields such as urban planning, heritage preservation, and cultural resource management, allowing us to shape the future with a greater awareness of our shared history.

Science is characterized by a systematic and evidence-based approach to understanding the natural world. It relies on empirical evidence gathered through observation, experimentation, and data analysis. Scientific hypotheses are subjected to rigorous testing and scrutiny, often through controlled experiments, and the results are evaluated through peer review and replication. Science emphasizes objectivity, logical reasoning, and the use of established theories and models to explain phenomena.

On the other hand, pseudoscience lacks the rigor and reliability of science. It often relies on anecdotal evidence, personal testimonials, or unverifiable claims. Pseudoscientific ideas tend to lack empirical support, fail to undergo rigorous testing, and often lack a clear methodology. They often cherry-pick data or use flawed reasoning to support their claims. Pseudoscience is typically resistant to critical evaluation and does not actively seek to disprove its own hypotheses.

In summary, science's commitment to evidence, testing, peer review, and adherence to the scientific method sets it apart from pseudoscience and gives it a superior position in explaining the world and advancing knowledge.

Learn more about Archaeology: https://brainly.com/question/30802304

#SPJ11

Athens's leadership in the Persian War launched Athens on a path to establish its dominance over other city-states in the region.

The Persian War began in 490 BC, with Athens playing a crucial role in defeating the Persian forces at the Battle of Marathon. It was during this period that Athens's leadership emerged as a dominant power. Following the victory, Athens established the Delian League, which was initially formed to counter the Persians. However, over time, the league transformed into an Athenian empire, with Athens controlling most of the Greek world. As the empire grew, Athens began imposing its rule over other city-states, demanding tribute and loyalty. The leadership that Athens displayed during the Persian War was the catalyst that launched Athens on a path to establish its dominance over other city-states in the region. This dominance would last for over a century until Athens was defeated by Sparta in the Peloponnesian War.

Learn more about dominance here:

https://brainly.com/question/31063798

#SPJ11

Athens's leadership in the Persian Wars launched Athens on a path to establish its dominance over other city-states in the region.

The Persian Wars, which took place between 499 and 449 BCE, were a series of conflicts between the Greek city-states, led by Athens and Sparta, and the Persian Empire. Athens played a crucial role in these wars, particularly through its naval power and strategic leadership under figures like Themistocles and Pericles.

Athens's victory over the Persians in the Battle of Marathon in 490 BCE and its leadership in the formation of the Delian League, a military alliance of Greek city-states, showcased its military prowess and political influence. The subsequent conflicts against the Persians, including the Battle of Salamis and the Battle of Plataea, further solidified Athens's position as a dominant force in the region.

This period of Athenian dominance, known as the Athenian Empire or the Golden Age of Athens, allowed the city-state to exert significant political, economic, and cultural influence over other city-states and establish itself as a leading power in ancient Greece.

To learn more about Persian Wars, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11027063

#SPJ11

Answer:

1.The women's suffrage movement was a decades-long fight to win the right to vote for women in the United States.

2. The 1848 Seneca Falls Woman's Rights Convention marked the beginning of the women's rights movement in the United States.

3. The 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states.

4. Some historians have even labeled the period from 1830 to 1850 as the “Age of Reform.” Women, in particular, played a major role in these changes. Key movements of the time fought for women's suffrage, limits on child labor, abolition, temperance, and prison reform.

Explanation:

The absence of defensive walls and burned buildings in Norte Chico cities has led scholars to assert that the andean civilizations of the area were mostly peaceful.

The presence of sunken central plazas in cities like Caral suggest that residents placed a strong emphasis on communal spaces for activities such as ceremonial events. Economic self-sufficiency of Norte Chico cities such as Caral further suggest that these cities did not have to compete for key economic and natural resources with inland regions, which could lead to conflict.

Additionally, there is no evidence of tools or depictions of warfare on the clay pottery and writings of the Andean civilizations, which further backs up the assertions that these cultures favored peace and cooperation over conflict and warfare.

To know more about andean civilizations, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11156297

#SPJ4

Answer:

What? Why?

Explanation:

\(They \: featured \: decorated \: borders \: and \: artwork \: that \: often \:overshadowed \: the \: text.\)

Answer: I got u fam.

The answer that is a characteristic of illuminated manuscripts is D) they featured decorated borders and artwork that often overshadowed the text.

Answer:

Expanding democratic rights could help bridge Britain's "two nations" in a few ways.

First, it would give a greater voice to those who feel they are underrepresented or marginalized in society. This could include individuals from certain geographic regions, ethnic groups, or socio-economic classes. By expanding democratic rights, these individuals would have a greater say in the decision-making process and would be more likely to have their concerns addressed.

Second, expanding democratic rights could help to foster greater trust and understanding between different groups in society. If people feel that they have a real stake in the political process and are able to participate fully, they may be more likely to listen to and engage with those who hold different views. This could help to break down some of the barriers that exist between different groups and promote greater social cohesion.

Finally, expanding democratic rights could help to ensure that political power is more evenly distributed across society. If certain groups or individuals have disproportionate influence over the political process, this can exacerbate social and economic inequalities. By expanding democratic rights, it may be possible to create a more level playing field and reduce the sense of division between different groups in society.

Overall, while expanding democratic rights is not a panacea for all of Britain's social and political problems, it could be an important step in the direction of greater social inclusion, political participation, and social cohesion.

Some non - examples of an Armistice include:

When countries that were at war with each other sign an armistice, it means that they are deciding not to continue fighting the war for some time, while they work on a permanent peace treaty. The nation or group of nations that is winning the war at the time, will dictate the conditions of the armistice to a larger extent that the nation or group of nations being defeated.

Non - examples of an armistice include the Paris Peace Treaties and the Treaty of San Francisco. These two treaties were signed to officially end the Second World War. They were not considered to be armistices because the Allied nations had asked for unconditional surrender from the Axis powers. No conditions were given, only imposed, so these were not examples of armistices.

Find out more on armistice at https://brainly.com/question/820453

#SPJ1

One reason why Chinese leaders took steps to improve relations with the United States during the 1970s was due to their desire to strengthen their position against the Soviet Union. After years of hostility towards the United States, Chinese leaders saw the potential benefits of forming an alliance with the US to balance against the Soviet Union's growing power and influence.

During the 1960s, China and the Soviet Union were allies and worked together to spread communism throughout the world. However, their relationship was strained due to ideological differences and border disputes. By the end of the decade, tensions had escalated into armed clashes, and China saw the Soviet Union as a threat to its national security. Chinese leaders believed that an alliance with the United States would help them to counter Soviet influence in Asia and strengthen their global position.

In 1971, the US announced that it would recognize the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government of China, which marked a significant turning point in the two countries' relationship. Over the next few years, the two nations worked to establish diplomatic ties, and President Richard Nixon's visit to China in 1972 paved the way for a new era of cooperation between the US and China. This new alliance proved to be beneficial for both countries and helped to shape the global political landscape for decades to come.

Learn more about Communism china policy in 1960

https://brainly.com/question/8304078

#SPJ11

Answer:

Because they had many gods

Explanation:

Answer:

Maya belief establishes the creation and sanctity of human beings, the earth, and all things sacred. This divine sanctity can be translated into Maya creation myths as well.

Explanation:

hope this helped

Paul's second Epistle to Timothy was written around A.D:63-67

According to the Guide to the Scriptures, "Pauline Epistles," scriptures.lds.org, Paul's Second Epistle to Timothy was most likely written between A.D. 64 and 65. The letter was written by Paul during his second Roman prison sentence, just before he was crucified (see Bible Dictionary, "Pauline Epistles").

a.d. 64–67. Following a fourth missionary voyage that is not mentioned in Acts, Paul most likely composed 2 Timothy while serving a second prison sentence in Rome. Paul, who was at Ephesus at the time, sent Timothy this "farewell" letter in anticipation of his impending death. In it, Paul urged Timothy to maintain his resolve and invited him to come for one more visit.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Learn more about Timothy at:

https://brainly.com/question/4443914

#SPJ1

Answer:

The aztec civilatation played a game similar to basket ball. the losers were often killed. I dont remember the name.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Aztecs lived in mesoamerica, and had many beliefs. One of them was about the god of rain. Each year, they would sacrifice more than 1,000 of its citizen.They would rip the heart out, and with the heart still pumping, the stabber held the heart up to the sky.

Hope This Helps!Sorry I can't give you any more info