which of the following statements describes why ross perot won zero electoral votes in the 1992 presidential election? choose 1 answer:

Interest rates usually fall during a recession. This is because during a recession, the demand for money decreases as people and businesses cut back on spending due to reduced real income. The given statement is TRUE.

As a result, banks and other lenders have excess funds to lend out, which leads to a reduction in interest rates. Additionally, central banks typically respond to a recession by cutting interest rates to encourage borrowing and spending, which can help stimulate economic growth.

However, it is important to note that the relationship between interest rates and economic conditions can be complex and may vary depending on a variety of factors.

For more such questions on Interest rates , click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30005476

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. Personal Freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.

Explanation:

Personal freedoms can mean a ton of things, for example the 10 amendments, the bill of rights, the entire U.S Constitution.

the U.S Government decided a long time ago that it would become a superpower for democracy, which, is working, but if we consider what democracy means, what it stands as an ideology, you can say it means:
Freedom for All
You can say it's goal is to champion:
Equality For All

Going back to my first sentence, when you would like to define "Personal Freedoms" which is a vague term because it can mean almost anything, but when you look at the key word "Personal" which affects only yourself, and when it effects only yourself can it take away the freedoms of others? No.

The Idea of "Personal Freedoms" Serving the government sounds a bit Totalitarian, the freedom of a person couldn't necessarily serve the government, unless they know something we don't, but we don't have to worry about this right now, but when they say "Serving the Government" are they labelling us as, "slaves?" or "Servants?" I don't see this (B) being the answer either.

When they say said freedoms can cause harm to the minority population, which I assume is persons under the age of 18 which varies by state, what do they mean?

The Minority population being excluded & Included from certain guaranteed rights has long been debated by U.S Lawmakers, such as: the right to own a gun, (Second Amendment), the Right to own a house or drive or get a credit card and bank account, Lawmakers exclude the minority population from certain rights to protect them, because yes, this can harm them, driving, owning a gun, buying a house, getting a credit card, drinking, smoking, vaping, etc.

But Then again, these very well effect the adult population just as great as the minority population and it asked if Personal Freedoms only affect the minority population, so, this is wrong.

Lastly on to the notion that personal freedoms are REQUIRED to contribute to the common good, the common good is a vague term and can mean ANYTHING, from helping your old granny cross the street to giving to the homeless, although it's distinct definition is of affecting everyone, we can also shrink it, to one person for another, when we think about Personal Freedoms and Common Good they are just so different and Personal Freedoms don't even have to do with Common Good, unless your thinking of the civil rights protest and Women's right's protest and black lives matter and the LGBTQ+ Community, but what we have to understand is that these freedom's are guaranteed to everyone, and you are not required to use these freedoms granted to you for the common good.

That is all young one, I see you'll have a bright future as a lawyer or judge someday and If your still confused, I'm accepting comments.

- I wish for my name to not be revealed, Criminal Defense Attorney-at-Law PhD & Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.

Javier (25) will file under the solitary status in 2021. He has a $25,000 modified adjusted gross income. He contributed $2,000 to his company's 401(k) plan during the year. He has never withdrawn money from a pension plan. Javier doesn't attend school. His retirement savings contribution credit (saver's credit) can only be worth up to:

$1,000. The justification is provided below.

What calculation supports the answer given above?

According to the Internal Revenue Service's 2021 Saver's Charge Rate Guideline, a single person with an Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) of between $21,501 and $33,000 will receive a savers credit rate equal to 10% of their contribution.

Hence,

Javier's 10% contribution will consist of:

10% x 2,000

= $200

It should be noted that rollover gifts are not eligible for the credit. Additionally, any recent distributions from an ABLE account, an IRA, or a retirement plan may reduce the amount of your qualifying contributions.

The maximum credit is $1,000 ($2,000 if married filing jointly), with the greatest creditable contribution being $2,000 ($4,000 if married filing jointly).

Learn more about Saver's Credit here:

https://brainly.com/question/14162621

#SPJ9

Answer:

OD

Explanation:

A person that has mental health issues might be able to understand what the mother is going through?

A woman with same mental health can understand Amelia on that base prospective Juror might the prosecution use a preemptory challenge on . Hence option D is Correct.

Many women experience postpartum depression (commonly known as PPD), which is a medical disorder. After giving delivery, there are intense emotions of sadness, anxiety (concern), and exhaustion that persist for a long time. You may find it challenging to care for both you and your infant as a result of these feelings.

After giving birth, most new mothers endure postpartum "baby blues," which frequently include mood changes, crying bouts, anxiety, and trouble sleeping. The first two to three days after delivery are usually when baby blues start, and they can last for up to two weeks.

By the above fact  prosecution use a preemptory challenge

Learn more about  Case Study here

https://brainly.com/question/27035549

# SPJ 2

The 2013 government shutdown was mostly a battle between republicans and democrats, a rational-material explanation claim.

The Democratic-Republicans were a political party in the US. Democratic-Republicans upheld a strict interpretation of the US Constitution and favored a compact federal structure with the preponderance of authority resting with state governments. They backed a thriving agrarian economy and opposed the Federalist objectives of industrialization and a national bank. According to a rational-material account, the 2013 government shutdown was essentially a conflict between the Republicans and the Democrats. The Affordable Care Act and the budget were the two main problems that caused the shutdown, with Republicans in the House of Representatives pushing for changes to the program while Democrats in the Senate and the White House refused to negotiate.

Learn more about Battle between republicans and democrats here:

https://brainly.com/question/30359155

#SPJ4

The cervical enlargement of the spinal cord supplies nerves to the shoulders and arms, whereas the lumbar enlargement supplies nerves to the lower limbs.

The spinal cord is a long, cylindrical bundle of nerves that extends from the base of the brain down through the vertebral column. It plays a crucial role in transmitting sensory information from the body to the brain and relaying motor commands from the brain to the muscles.

The cervical enlargement refers to the region of the spinal cord where there is an increase in the size of the spinal cord's gray matter. This enlargement occurs in the cervical region, specifically in the lower cervical vertebrae (C5 to T1). The nerves arising from this region supply the upper extremities, including the shoulders, arms, and hands. These nerves enable movements and sensations in the arms and hands.

On the other hand, the lumbar enlargement refers to the region of the spinal cord where there is a similar increase in the size of the gray matter. The lumbar enlargement occurs in the lower back region, specifically in the vertebral segments L1 to S3. The nerves originating from this region supply the lower extremities, including the hips, legs, and feet. These nerves are responsible for motor control and sensory perception in the lower limbs.

The cervical and lumbar enlargements of the spinal cord are specialized regions that reflect the different motor and sensory requirements of the upper and lower limbs. Understanding these enlargements helps in comprehending the distribution and functions of the nerves throughout the body.

To know more about  lumbar enlargement, click here:https://brainly.com/question/29331747

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think the answer should be the last one "placing a trade embargo on oil

Explanation:

The reason I believe the answer is number 4 is because a domestic policy affects or applies to people/institutions within a particular country and they tend to be internal and so after using that definition the best-fit answer would be number 4.

Answer:BrhfdjExplanation:shut up brainly admin is trash

The statement that the nurse manager would have to be correct is  "If you render aid in an accident, do not leave the scene until another competent person can take over."

One appropriate statement for a nurse manager to make when reviewing Good Samaritan laws with newly licensed nurses could be:

"The Good Samaritan laws are designed to protect healthcare providers, like ourselves, who provide emergency medical assistance in good faith outside of the workplace. These laws provide legal immunity and protect us from being held liable for any injuries or harm that may result from providing medical assistance in an emergency situation."

It is important for the nurse manager to accurately and clearly explain what the Good Samaritan laws are, why they exist, and how they apply to healthcare providers.

Read more on nursing here:https://brainly.com/question/6685374

#SPJ1

Answer:

The 28th Amendment is important because it is a key to fixing the system that makes high-dollar donors more powerful than every other American. The amendment offers lasting, structural reform to ensure an equal voice for every American.

Explanation:

that little paragraph is just about why it is important, i cant help you with the rest because i don't know the answer to the last two questions, i hope this still helped in some way, remember that this paragraph that is above only explains why the 28th amendment is important. your welcome, have a great rest of your day :)

Regulations issued by Executive Branch agencies carry the full legal weight of the law, but they are only backed by laws passed by Congress.

To learn more about Executive Branch agencies refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/838027

#SPJ4

Answer: Louis Haas, PhD, professor of history at Middle Tennessee State University, wrote in an Aug. 20, 2019 opinion piece titled “Guns Are a Huge Part of American Society; Taking Them Away Won’t Help: Today’s Talker,” published at usatoday.com:

“Gun control is not the answer to America’s gun violence. In the recent mass shootings, the shooters purchased their weapons legally. Likewise, the policies promoted by gun control activists would not impact mass shootings…

What then to do about mass killings in public or at work places? More guns. We need more legal concealed carry, and we need more places to allow concealed carry, so that the intended victims of a mass shooting can have a decent chance of surviving or stopping these events.”

here my thing it. it wouldnt let me publish it, so i put it in a word doc

The conduct of Athlete A may amount to extortion or blackmail, as well as possible privacy legislation infractions. The particulars of  jurisdiction and the facts produced would determine if the approach was successful.

Extortion.—

Extortion is the dishonest act of inducing someone to transfer to another person any property, a valuable security, or anything signed or sealed that could be changed into a valuable security by purposefully inciting that person to fear harm to themselves or others.

Extortion is the illegal taking of property from another person. use of actual or threatened force, violence or fear. Such coercive extortion is synonymous with the term blackmail, which is an older term used to indicate extortion.

To know more about legislation visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/31133574

#SPJ1

The responsibility for creating and enforcing immigration policy in the United States primarily belongs to the federal government.

Under the U.S. Constitution, the power to establish and enforce immigration policy is granted to the federal government. The federal government has authority over matters related to immigration, including the admission, deportation, and naturalization of immigrants. This responsibility is primarily vested in various federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), specifically through its component agencies like U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

The federal government's authority in immigration policy stems from the need to maintain uniformity and consistency in immigration laws across the entire country. Immigration issues often involve matters of national security, foreign relations, and the overall management of the immigration system. By having a centralized authority at the federal level, the government can establish comprehensive immigration policies that address the nation's interests and adhere to constitutional principles.

While the federal government holds primary responsibility for immigration policy, there is also interaction and collaboration between the federal, state, and local governments. States and localities may have certain powers related to immigration enforcement, such as cooperating with federal agencies or establishing their own policies within the boundaries set by federal law. However, the ultimate authority and the ability to create and enforce immigration policy lies with the federal government.

Learn more about Immigration : brainly.com/question/14449539
#SPJ11

Answer:

Indeterminate sentencing is a system of sentencing in which there is more flexibility in deciding what an individual's sentence will be. Usually, the sentence is given in the form of a range, with a minimum and maximum amount of time to be served.

Explanation:

I hope this helps but you could've googled what is considered in indeterminate sentencing and what ever wasn't included is your answer

You're welcome though!

Considering indeterminate sentencing, Judges must follow strict sentence guidelines is not correct. Thus, option D is correct.

A sort of custodial sentence known as a "indeterminate sentence" is one in which the condemned person's release date is uncertain and consists of a range of years (for example, five to 10 years).

The state parole board performs a hearing to decide whether a prisoner is eligible for parole after serving a predetermined amount of time. The idea behind an indeterminate sentence is that some inmates will be rehabilitated while in jail, and those who demonstrate progress will be granted parole (conditional release) and may not serve out the remainder of their sentence behind bars.

Therefore, we can conclude that option D is correct.

Learn more about indeterminate sentencing here:

https://brainly.com/question/7202734

#SPJ2

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Congress sought to limit inmate appeals the strict exhaustion requirement of the PLRA is arguably its most significant feature.

In other words, since exhaustion is not allowed while a lawsuit is pending, all of a prisoner's claims must be exhausted administratively before a lawsuit is even filed. Case dismissal may occur if this is not done.

Since each state is free to design its own administrative procedure for resolving prisoner complaints, the PLRA leaves open the question of what administrative remedies the states must offer to convicts. Whatever the method, the Supreme Court has ruled that inmates must follow the rules before launching a lawsuit.

Learn more about PRLA here

https://brainly.com/question/9717897

# SPJ 1

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

In this decision-making process, each Federal government branch plays the following roles:

The three main branches of government are as follows: The executive, legislative, and judicial branches are examples of these.Law enforcement is the responsibility of the executive branch. Additionally, it is accountable for the country's governance. The president, vice president, and others are members of the executive branch.

Legislation is made, presidential appointments are approved, and so on by the legislative branch. The Senate and the House of Representatives make up the legislative branch.

To learn about federal government

https://brainly.com/question/12486518

#SPJ4

Answer:

I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B

The Lanham Act provided funding for all of the following except postsecondary schooling for workers. ( Option B )

- The Lanham Act establishes a mechanism for national trademark registration and shields the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of marks that are confusing to consumers or likely to dilute a well-known mark.

- Under the Lanham Act, only parties who have suffered a competitive injury may bring an action for false and deceptive advertising. Even if they are "harmed" by the fraudulent advertising, customers typically lack the legal authority to file a lawsuit.

To know more about Lanham Act, kindly click on the link below :

https://brainly.com/question/13323765?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The complete question is :

The federal government initiative known as the Lanham Act provided funding for all of the following except ______.

A. the training of workers in war plants

B. postsecondary schooling for workers

C. the construction of schools near military installations

D. childcare for working parents

Answer:

The Correct Answer Actually is :

It is the most common requirement and often accompanied by further academic work or training.

Explanation:

Just took the test 100%

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

It demonstrated that even a president is subject to the law

The term "gerrymander," which was first used in the Boston Gazette on March 26, 1812 in Boston, Massachusetts, was a combination of the names "Gerry" and the salamander animal.

On October 12, 1812, the Federal Republican in Georgetown, Washington, DC, published what may be the first use of the phrase to describe the redistricting in a different state (Maryland). The phrase was used in American newspapers at least 80 times between March and December of 1812.

By a 5–4 decision on June 27, 2019, the Supreme Court declared that claims of unlawful partisan gerrymandering are not subject to federal court scrutiny because they raise politically non-justiciable issues. This decision effectively removed the matter outside the jurisdiction of federal courts.

To know more about gerrymandering visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3167585

#SPJ4

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

it is B: a small CD store ...

Explanation:

i just took the test

Answer:

the answer is false not true