The Judge was likely concerned with the release of the records because they could make certain people look bad, or could be used to manipulate people for personal gain, rather than solely for the pursuit of justice.
The sensitive nature of the documents could create privacy issues for those involved, and some documents may contain false information or be leaked without the permission of all parties involved. Furthermore, many documents may contain information regarding protected classes, which could create potential legal issues.
Lastly, the release of the records would be a departure from precedent, as some documents in public files may not have been meant to be widely distributed. Therefore, the Judge was likely hesitant with the release of the records due to these ethical considerations.
To know more about Judge , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16726610
#SPJ4
Since the start of the 1970s, how has the supreme court ruled regarding the commerce clause of the constitution?.
In 1970 supreme court limit congress' ability to use commerce clause to address national issues
The U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause is included in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3. Congress has the authority under the Constitution to "control trade with foreign countries, among the various states, and with Indian tribes. The Commerce Clause has been frequently invoked by Congress as justification for exerting legislative control over the actions of states and their residents, sparking intense and ongoing debate about the distribution of power between the states and the federal government. The Commerce Clause has historically been seen as both a gift of power to Congress and a limitation on the power of the States to regulate themselves. The Trade Clause forbids states from enacting laws that discriminate against or unduly impede interstate commerce, and this is known as the "Dormant Commerce Clause."
To know more about Commerce Clause refer to https://brainly.com/question/846709
#SPJ4
the basis for zoning and other land use control laws is:
The basis for zoning and other land use control laws is to regulate and control the use and development of land in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
Zoning laws typically divide a jurisdiction, such as a city or county, into different zones or districts, each with specific permitted uses, restrictions, and requirements. This helps to ensure that incompatible land uses are separated and that the overall character and quality of the community are preserved. Zoning laws may also regulate factors such as building heights, setbacks, parking requirements, and other aspects of development.
Other land use control laws, such as environmental regulations and building codes, also serve to protect public health, safety, and welfare by regulating the impact of development on the environment and ensuring that buildings are constructed to meet certain standards for safety and quality.
Learn more about development here:
https://brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ11
which of the following is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.
Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.
Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.
The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?
cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money
Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income
Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"
Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:
brainly.com/question/31749142
#SPJ4
Which courts are tribunals created by congress to handle specialized types of cases?
Answer:
Article one courts are tribunals created by the Congress to handle specialized types of cases, especially those that rise under the regulatory law of federal agencies. The decisions of Article one courts are generally reviewable in Article three courts.
Explanation:quizlet
Article one courts are tribunals established by Congress to handle certain sorts of matters, particularly those arising under federal agency regulation law. Article one court decisions are often reviewable in Article three courts.
What exactly are constitutional courts?A constitutional court is a high court that focuses on constitutional law. Its primary authority is to determine whether challenged laws are in fact unconstitutional, i.e. whether they violate constitutionally established norms, privileges, and freedoms, among other things.
For more information about constitutional courts refer to the link:https://brainly.com/question/1822517
#SPJ4
what is school based assessment
Answer:
a test of your school knowledge
Explanation:
A school based assessment is a process that requires the teachers to mark their students' work for fair assessment of their periodic performance.
The assessment is used as a information to increase students learning and development
In conclusion, the school based assessment is important because its allows to assess the performance of students.
Read more about school based assessment
brainly.com/question/26921511
which of the following statements is not true regarding a presentence investigation (psi)?
The following statement is not true regarding a presentence investigation (PSI).
A presentence investigation (PSI) is a comprehensive assessment conducted by probation officers or other authorized individuals to gather information about an offender before sentencing. It is used to provide the court with relevant information to make an informed decision regarding the appropriate sentence for the convicted individual. The PSI report typically includes details about the offender's personal and criminal history, social and family background, employment and education, substance abuse history, and any other relevant factors.
Based on this understanding, the statement "The PSI is conducted after the sentencing decision has been made" is not true. In reality, a PSI is conducted before the sentencing decision. The purpose of the PSI is to assist the court in making an appropriate and fair sentencing decision by providing a comprehensive understanding of the offender's background and circumstances. It is an essential step in the sentencing process that helps ensure that the punishment fits the crime and considers the individual's specific circumstances.
To learn more about PSI visit:
brainly.com/question/32062309
#SPJ11
the purpose of competition policy
Show an adequate demonstration of the relationship between
uncertainties and
risk against time on a graph.
In risk analysis, it is essential to assess potential losses and the likelihood of their occurrence. Uncertainties are quantified as probabilities and represented by a risk curve, which depicts the relationship between risk and time. The shape of the risk curve varies based on the level of risk and the duration under consideration.
Typically, the curve starts at a low probability, gradually increases to a peak representing the maximum probable risk level, and then declines.
This peak serves as a reference point for risk assessment.
Risk curves are constructed using historical data on past hazards, such as natural disasters or accidents, along with the associated probabilities.
In summary, uncertainties and risks are interconnected, and a risk curve effectively portrays the temporal evolution of risk.
Read more about uncertainties
https://brainly.com/question/14650744
#SPJ11
Why do people participate in local or national political issues?
Answer:
.
Explanation:
People get involved in politics for a variety of reasons. They may be personally motivated because of an event that changed their lives. They may receive invitations to participate from friends, organizations, political parties, or a candidate’s campaign. A person’s socialization, life experience, and attitudes toward politics can influence participation. Some people have a strong sense of civic duty and a belief that they can influence government, which compels them to act. Barriers, such as legal obstacles, may preclude some people from engaging politically.
Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall are battling over the fortune of J. Howard Marshall II, is believed to be one of the richest people in Texas. The Marshalls' litigation has worked its way through state and federal courts in Louisiana, Texas, and California. Justices will decide whether Bankruptcy Court has statutory authority to issue final judgment on Vickie's counterclaim.
The Bankruptcy Court lacked the constitutional authority to enter judgment in Vickie Howard's case. Vickie was J. Howard's third wife and married him about a year before his death. He had bestowed on Vickie many monetary and other gifts during their courtship and marriage. But he did not include her in his will, and she sued for half of his fortune.
After J. Howard's death, Vickie filed a petition for bankruptcy in the Central District of California. Pierce filed a complaint in that bankruptcy proceeding, contending Vickie defamed him. Vickie responded to Pierce's initial complaint by filing a counterclaim for tortious interference. Bankruptcy Court issued a judgment on Vickie's counterclaim in her favor. Federal bankruptcy law does not guide how to tell which matters arise under Title 11 and which are Title 11 cases.
The structure and context of § 157 contradict Pierce's interpretation, the authors say. Congress failed to provide any framework for identifying or adjudicating the asserted category of core but not "arising" proceedings, they say.
1. Did the court find that federal law granted the Bankruptcy Court jurisdiction over the debtor’s counterclaim to the creditor’s claim? Why?
2. Did the court find that the Bankruptcy Court has the constitutional authority to do so? Why?
1. No, the court did not find that federal law granted the Bankruptcy Court jurisdiction over the debtor's counterclaim to the creditor's claim because Congress did not provide a framework for identifying or adjudicating such cases.
2. No, the court did not find that the Bankruptcy Court had the constitutional authority to adjudicate the counterclaim because the Bankruptcy Court lacked the constitutional authority to enter judgment on Vickie's counterclaim in J. Howard Marshall II's case.
The court concluded that the Bankruptcy Court did not have jurisdiction over the debtor's counterclaim based on federal law because Congress had not provided a framework for determining such cases. Additionally, the court found that the Bankruptcy Court lacked the constitutional authority to enter judgment on Vickie's counterclaim in J. Howard Marshall II's case.
This means that the Bankruptcy Court's judgment in favor of Vickie was deemed invalid, and the battle over J. Howard Marshall II's fortune would need to be resolved through other legal avenues outside of the Bankruptcy Court.
Learn more about Bankruptcy Court: https://brainly.com/question/29666976
#SPJ11
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
Decide whether each
description fits trial courts only, appellate courts
only, or both, and write the letter of the description
in the correct part of the diagram. The first one is
done for you.
A. Hears civil cases
B. Might have a jury trial
C. Does not hear cases for the first time
D. Hears criminal cases
E. Reviews a verdict to look for mistakes
F. Usually has three-judge panels
G. Hears cases for the first time
H. Works with laws
describe two ways in which a right to say no protect citizens
Answer:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
A blood droplet has a width of 5 mm and a length of 6 mm. What is the
angle of impact?
Explanation:
56 degree angle.
What does it mean when our court system is identified as a dual court system?
Answer:
dual court system the division of the courts into two separate systems, one federal and one state,
The long-term damage done by heavy drinking or drug use is ...
A. obviously visible.
B. not usually visible.
C. negligible.
The damage done by heavy drinking or drug use is obviously visible in long-term .
What are the effects of heavy drinking?Digestion issues liver illness,heart related disease, stroke and High BP(Blood Pressure) .Cancer of the rectum, liver, colon, mouth, throat, esophagus, and breast. Deterioration of Immune system increases the chances of getting sick. Issues with memory and learning, including dementia, and poor academic performance.How sometimes drug is useful ?High cholesterol and high BP(Blood Pressure) are the two conditions which can be managed through drug medications . These medications can slow down its few long-term harmful effects on the human body. Among the most crucial medications (or vaccines) are Vaccinations .Drug usage is obviously for recreational purposes, and it has known to provide short-term physical benefits.To know more about Drugs visit
https://brainly.com/question/4920246
#SPJ1
Under the US structure and operation of government each state can make, enforce
and intrepret its own laws even if the laws are inconsistent with another state's laws or
federal law.
True or False
Answer: False
Explanation:
The statement that "Under the US structure and operation of government each state can make, enforce and intrepret its own laws even if the laws are inconsistent with another state's laws or federal law" is false.
Even though state governments have the right to prescribe certain policy on education, taxation, commerce etc, it should be noted that such laws should not contradict the federal laws.
According to the Constitution of the United States, the federal law is being regarded as the supreme law and no.other state can contradict what it says.
On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey reasons that AAA had no control over the independent contractor's work and thus Pershad was an employee of Five Star, but Five Star (and by extension, Pershad) were independent contractors to AAA. This type of arrangement is not uncommon. Neither are situations where trucking companies (among others) employ individuals who are designated as independent contractors but are trained by the company and have a manual of regulations provided to them which, in essence, controls where they drive, how they drive, how long are the drivers' work breaks, and who can ride in the cab of the truck. Additionally, drivers often wear a company uniform. The artifice of calling someone an independent contractor when the driver actually is not, is no more than an effort to avoid liability for the person's actions on the job and certain regulatory (unemployment insurance; workers compensation, etc.) and tax considerations. Consequently, the situations must be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis to discern the actual status of the individual. Do you agree with the courts reasoning? Why?
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question.
Explanation:
Yeah, We agree with the North Carolina Court the decision that 5 Stars was an independent consultant. AAA does hire and fir five Stars staff, who may not evaluate all staff to see if their company is fit. they will not. AAA employed 5 Star in the name of the rental agency and was not responsible for its and other businesses. It is an employer, that is a consultant regardless of who determines to work. Decided to hire that work or even the independent contractor the company that had hired an independent contractor. We employ people as they already have the training to do a work, which the organization has completed, this is like recruiting an employment agency. I don't think companies avoid liability.
Who filed a 1966 supreme court case because he was arrested and interrogated without being told of his rights?.
the most distinguishing feature of american political parties has always been the absence of
The most distinguishing feature of American political parties has always been the absence of ideological coherence.
American parties are not based on a single, unifying ideology, but rather on a coalition of different interests and groups. This has led to a system of "big tent" parties that are often internally divided.
For example, the Republican Party is home to a wide range of views on issues such as social welfare, healthcare, and foreign policy. The same is true of the Democratic Party.
This lack of ideological coherence can make it difficult for American parties to develop clear and consistent policy positions.
However, it can also be seen as a strength of American democracy. The lack of ideological coherence allows for a more diverse range of voices to be heard in the political process. This can lead to more innovative and effective solutions to problems.
In recent years, there has been a growing trend of ideological polarization in American politics.
This is due in part to the rise of social media, which has made it easier for people to self-segregate into echo chambers where they are only exposed to information that confirms their existing beliefs.
This polarization has made it more difficult for American parties to find common ground and compromise.
It remains to be seen whether the trend of ideological polarization will continue in the future. However, it is clear that the lack of ideological coherence is a defining feature of American political parties.
This has both advantages and disadvantages, and it will be interesting to see how it plays out in the years to come.
To know more about ideological coherence, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17237578#
#SPJ11
Why is it important to keep legal correspondence short?
Answer:
because that if there were no law there would be Robers all in the world
Prinz v US Analyze Prinz v United States (1997), discussing the overarching issue, how the case arose, the Supreme Court's decision, and the rationale for that decision. Please include whether you agree with SCOTUS, and why?
1) This case arose as a result of Printz's main argument, which was that the federal government could not compel state and local governments to carry out federal policy for the following reasons: The Tenth Amendment for the Constitution strengthens the concept of a limited federal government and protects states from such mandates.
2) In Printz v. United States, the United States Supreme Court decided the case in 1997. The Court agreed with Printz and Mack and declared the mandatory background check provisions unconstitutional. Writing for the case's 5-4 majority. "The federal government might neither issue directives requiring the states to address specific problems, nor command the officers of the states, or those of their political subdivisions, to manage or enforce a federal regulatory scheme," Justice Antonin Scalia concluded. 3) The Printz decision reaffirmed the Court's 1992 decision in New York v. United States, in which the Court invalidated provisions of a federal statute governing nuclear waste policy for violating state sovereignty in violation of the Tenth Amendment.
4) According to the Federalism Five, there are fixed boundaries between federal and state and local powers, and the Court must be willing to define and enforce those boundaries. 5) These and other cases have sparked heated debates among scholars and commentators about the Court's proper role in defining the scope of federal powers.
6) In issuing this wave of federalism decisions and resurrecting doctrines long thought to be buried in a judicial graveyard, the Rehnquist Court has been dubbed a "federalism revolution," though others argue that the Court's decisions in this area are far from revolutionary. 7) In conclusion, the Court's interpretations of the Tenth Amendment and other constitutional federalism provisions suggest that there are legal limits to federal power, and in doing so, the Court appears to have strengthened state and local sovereignty.
Learn more about Printz, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30830002
#SPJ4
More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
What is the meaning of felonious attacks?As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.
These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Missing options True/False
Read more about attacks
brainly.com/question/28866933
#SPJ1
which of the following is a reason the supreme court was asked to rule on various provisions and interpretations of the bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002
The Supreme Court was asked to rule on various provisions and interpretations of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 due to constitutional challenges.
The reason the Supreme Court was called upon to rule on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 was primarily because of constitutional challenges raised by different parties and interest groups. The Act, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act, aimed to regulate campaign financing, but its provisions faced legal scrutiny regarding their compatibility with the First Amendment's protection of free speech. These challenges led to cases such as McConnell v. FEC and Citizens United v. FEC, where the Supreme Court rendered significant decisions that shaped the interpretation and application of the Act.
The Court's involvement was crucial in determining the constitutionality of specific provisions and clarifying the boundaries of campaign finance regulations.
To know more about First Amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1114017
#SPJ11
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Are Narcotics addictive
Answer:
yes very much so
Explanation:
dont do any
Write a report based on a news article wherein a court convicted an individual based on DNA evidence years after the crime took place. Discuss how science and technology helped in this case
A sample of a suspect's DNA can be compared to biological evidence discovered at a crime scene if the suspect is known. Technology can provide a more efficient way to investigate.
The results of the comparison may then be used to determine whether the suspect committed the crime or was present at the crime scene. A chemical test called DNA fingerprinting can reveal a person's or another living thing's genetic make-up. It is used as testimony in court, to identify corpses, find blood relatives, and search for medical treatments. In a criminal investigation, a forensic scientist's duties and responsibilities are vital because they entail carefully reviewing an item of evidence while making sure it hasn't been tampered with. The investigation of a criminal act involves a varied group of forensic scientists and forensic equipment.
Learn more about testimony here:
https://brainly.com/question/26651069
#SPJ4
Drivers should position of vehicles in the center of the lane and which they are driving ? True or false
Answer: true
Explanation:
Melbourne Awesome Ltd supplies a wide range of folding bicycles. Melbourne Awesome Ltd derives Australian sourced income for the current tax year comprising net income from trading of $80,000, franked distribution from public companies amounting to $28,000, (carrying an imputation credit of $12,000), unranked distributions from resident private companies amounting to $25,000 and rental income of $5,500. Melbourne Awesome Ltd also have total deductions (Business Expenses) totaling $55,000.
Answer: $21450
Explanation:
Here's the remainder of the question:
Required: Calculate the net tax payable by All Sports Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2019. (Assume company tax rate is 30%)
The following can be gotten from the question:
Rental income = $5500
Add: Net income from trading = $80,000
Less: Business expenses = $55,000
Add: Franked distribution = $28,000
Less: imputation credit = $12,000
Add: unfranked distribution = $25,000
Total income = $71,500
Net tax payable will be:
= 30% × $71500
= 30/100 × $71500
= 0.3 × $71500
= $21450
Is it 911 because of 9/11???
Answer:
No
Explanation:
It was just a coinvience. 911 is a short number that people can type really quickly, if they don't have much time or they're in big trouble and need assitenace.