The religious or spiritual principal used by Henry II to spread out and to enforce the concept of a criminal law administered by a central government authority across the length and breadth of Great Britain was called,

The  major disadvantages of trade barriers is that Trade barriers reduce the variety of available consumer goods.

The Impacts of trade barriers on business is very common and known. Trade barriers are known to be such as tariffs that are placed on food imports or subsidies for farmers in a form of developed economies.

This is said to have lead to a form of overproduction and also the dumping of goods on world markets. This tends to lower the world prices and it becomes a disadvantage to farmers in developing economies.

Learn more about Trade barriers  from

https://brainly.com/question/1326741

Answer: Trade barriers reduce the variety of available consumer goods

Explanation:

The Virginia Plan provided for a bicameral legislature and a chief executive. It did not explicitly include a national supreme court or a standing army.

The Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, outlined a framework for the structure and powers of the newly proposed federal government in the United States. It called for a bicameral legislature consisting of two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. This system allowed for proportional representation based on population size, giving larger states more influence. Additionally, the Virginia Plan proposed the establishment of a chief executive, or a president, to oversee the executive functions of the government.

While the Virginia Plan emphasized the need for a strong national government, it did not explicitly include provisions for a national supreme court or a standing army. These aspects were addressed separately during the constitutional deliberations. The creation of a national supreme court was included in the final Constitution with the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the structure and jurisdiction of the federal judiciary system. The standing army, or the establishment of a professional military force, was later addressed in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, which granted Congress the power to raise and support armies.

Learn more about bicameral legislation here : brainly.com/question/491088

#SPJ11

The highest source of law in a country's legal system is typically its constitution.

A constitution is a document that outlines the fundamental principles and rules that govern a country's political system and its relationship with its citizens. It establishes the structure and powers of the government, defines individual rights and liberties, and sets limits on the exercise of governmental authority. Constitutions are usually written documents that are created through a formal process, such as a constitutional convention or a referendum, and they can be amended or revised through specific procedures outlined in the constitution itself. In many countries, the constitution is considered to be the supreme law of the land, meaning that all other laws must be consistent with its provisions. In addition to constitutions, other sources of law may include statutes, regulations, case law, and customary law. These sources of law may be created by legislative bodies, administrative agencies, courts, or the community at large, but they must generally be consistent with the principles and rules established in the constitution. Overall, the highest source of law in a country's legal system is its constitution, which serves as the foundation for its political and legal institutions and provides a framework for the creation and interpretation of other laws.

To know more about what a constitution is, click here: https://brainly.com/question/27954283
#SPJ4

Answer:

A. injury and at the time of the suit.

Explanation:

A corporation can be defined as a corporate organization that has facilities and owns or controls assets used for the production of goods and services in at least one country other than its headquarter (home office) located in its home country.

This ultimately implies that, a corporation is a corporate organization that owns or controls its business in two or more countries.

One of the advantage of a corporation is that, owners have limited liability for debt to the extent to which they have invested and as such are not personally liable for some of the debt owed by corporation.

A derivative suit can be defined as a lawsuit that's brought forward by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation, to either defend or enforce a legal right (claim) against a third party such as a director or executive officer in the corporation.

Hence, to bring a derivative suit to a court of competent jurisdiction, a shareholder must own stock at the time of the injury and at the time of the suit.

The Tea Act was passed by parliament that led to a famous event where colonists dressed up as Native Americans and committed acts of vandalism and destruction.

Tea act is one of the intolerable acts that preceded the American Revolution. In the history of the British American colonies, Lord North's legislative maneuver was used by the British ministry to legalize the sale of English tea in the country. 

All Townshend Acts charges were removed in 1770, averting a prior crisis. The only duty left was only tea, which since that peridd has been mostly imported into the Colonies by Dutch smugglers. 

The Tea Act changed excise laws so that the financially precarious British East India Company could pay the Townshend duty and still shortchange its rivals in order to help it sell the 17,000,000 pounds of tea it had stored in England.

To know more about Tea Act, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/5567830

#SPJ4

The given statement "The uniform commercial code is a major source of laws influencing data and privacy" is False.

With the intention of harmonising the laws governing sales and other commercial transactions throughout the United States, the Uniform Commercial Code, which was first published in 1952, is one of several Uniform Acts that have been established as law. The UCC must be adopted by all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the United States Territories.

While most U.S. jurisdictions have succeeded in accomplishing this challenging goal, some have not embraced every article in the UCC, while others have not adopted any at all. Additionally, the UCC's adoption differs considerably from one U.S. jurisdiction to another.

To know more about Law, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13242861

#SPJ4

The correct answer is option (c) that is the plaintiff and the defendant must not reside in the same state and the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000.

Diversity jurisdiction is a type of subject-matter jurisdiction in U.S. law that allows U.S. federal courts to hear cases that do not concern a federal question.  To exercise diversity jurisdiction, two or more states' residents must be at odds over a dispute of $75,000 or more.

The purpose of this provision is not to allow one state to exercise jurisdiction over another. Diversity of citizenship occurs when the plaintiffs and defendants in a lawsuit do not have common citizenship of any state. That is to say, no one on either side of the argument can claim any common citizenship with anyone else involved in the debate.

To learn more about diversity of citizenship, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27417773

#SPJ1

Answer:

the one whom was assaulted ?

Explanation:

The Environmental Impact Assessment Act evaluates and manages the environmental impacts of proposed projects, promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.

A framework for assessing and managing the potential environmental effects of proposed projects or activities is established by the Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Its main advantages include promoting sustainable development by taking into account social, economic and environmental factors, protecting the environment by identifying and mitigating negative effects and facilitating public participation in decision making processes.

The act promotes project enhancements and modifications, ensures adherence to environmental regulations and provides comprehensive information on environmental impacts to enable informed decision making. The EIA Act promotes more environmentally conscious and sustainable development, ecosystem protection and a balance between development and conservation by incorporating environmental factors into project planning.

Learn more about Environmental Impact Assessment Act. at:

brainly.com/question/33015812

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court ruled that the "individual mandate" of the ACA could not be justified as constitutional under the Commerce Clause because it compels individuals to engage in commerce by purchasing health insurance, rather than regulating existing commercial activity.

The Commerce Clause grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states, but the Court determined that this power does not extend to forcing people to participate in commerce.

The Court reasoned that if Congress could mandate the purchase of health insurance under the Commerce Clause, it could potentially mandate the purchase of other goods and services, which would significantly expand the scope of federal power.

Instead, the Court upheld the individual mandate as a constitutional exercise of Congress's taxing power, since the penalty for not having health insurance could be considered a tax.

In summary, the Supreme Court ruled that the individual mandate could not be justified under the Commerce Clause because it would require people to engage in commerce, rather than regulating existing commerce, and thus could lead to an excessive expansion of federal power. However, the mandate was ultimately upheld based on Congress's power to tax.

To know more about Supreme Court refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29759733#

#SPJ11

1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange.

2. To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial.

3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives.

4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect.

1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange. However, injuries to certain areas such as the genitals, breasts, or inner thighs would typically raise concerns about possible abuse or inappropriate behavior. These areas are considered particularly sensitive, and injuries in these locations may indicate potential harm or mistreatment.

2. Nixzmary Brown was a seven-year-old girl who was tragically killed by her parents in 2006. Her case garnered significant media attention and exposed failures within the child welfare system. Nixzmary suffered from severe physical abuse and neglect, and her parents subjected her to prolonged abuse, leading to her death. The case revealed various systemic failures, including missed opportunities by child welfare agencies and schools to intervene and protect Nixzmary from her abusive parents.

To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial. Ensuring effective information sharing and collaboration between schools, child welfare agencies, law enforcement, and medical professionals would enable early detection and intervention in cases of child abuse. Additionally, enhancing training and awareness for professionals and the public regarding the signs of abuse and neglect can help identify and report cases more effectively.

3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives. Community support programs can provide resources and assistance to families in need, such as access to affordable housing, job training, mental health services, and childcare options. By addressing the underlying issues that contribute to neglect, such programs can help alleviate stressors and provide support to parents, reducing the likelihood of neglectful behaviors.

Parenting education initiatives are also essential in preventing neglect. These programs can offer classes and workshops that teach parents about child development, positive discipline techniques, communication skills, and stress management. By equipping parents with knowledge and skills, they can better understand their child's needs and respond appropriately, reducing the risk of neglect.

4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect. By ignoring the situation and not seeking help or intervention, the mother is failing to provide the necessary care and support her child requires.

This type of neglect falls under the category of physical neglect as it involves the failure to ensure the child's physical well-being and safety. Substance abuse can have severe consequences on a child's health, development, and overall welfare. Neglecting to address drug addiction puts the child at significant risk and can lead to long-term harm.

As an investigator, it would be important to assess the situation further, gather evidence, and determine the extent of the child's drug addiction and the impact it has on their well-being. The next steps would involve involving appropriate authorities, such as child protective services or law enforcement, to ensure the child's safety and initiate appropriate interventions. The goal would be to provide support and resources to the child and the family to address the addiction and mitigate further harm to the child's well-being.

Know more about Drug addiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/12039156

#SPJ8

Answer:

the right answer is rational self interest,

Explanation:

i just took the quiz

Answer:

Laws are binding rules that relate to the conduct of individuals and businesses and are designed to prescribe obligation or duty and enforce justice. ... Business owners must follow all regulations and laws to avoid fines. Vacationers and visitors to other countries should understand and respect local laws.

Explanation:

Business law is the law that governs what happens with commercial matters, and there are two main types: regulation of commercial entities and regulation of commercial transactions. Laws have evolved over centuries, and have had to adapt to changes in technology and society.

Answer:

None of the above

Explanation:

None of the conditions listed would permit a court to invalidate a contract on the grounds of unilateral mistake. The conditions that could permit a court to invalidate a contract on grounds of unilateral mistake are:

a. One party made a mistake about a material fact, and the other party knew or had reason to know about the mistake.

b. The mistake was so serious that the contract is unconscionable, that is, so unreasonable that it is outrageous.

This eliminates answer choices A and B. Option C is not correct because it states that only one party made a mistake about a material fact, and the other party knew about the mistake. In a situation of unilateral mistake, only one party makes a mistake, and the other party is not aware of the mistake or does not have reason to know about it. If the other party knew or had reason to know about the mistake, then it may not be a case of unilateral mistake and the contract may not be invalidated on those grounds.

Option D is not correct because the mistake resulting from gross negligence is not typically considered a valid ground for a court to invalidate a contract on the grounds of unilateral mistake. In general, the courts will only permit the invalidation of a contract for unilateral mistake where the mistake was caused by a serious error or misunderstanding of a material fact that was not within the reasonable knowledge or contemplation of the mistaken party at the time of contracting. Mistakes resulting from gross negligence or carelessness, on the other hand, are generally viewed as the responsibility of the mistaken party, and will not typically provide grounds for contract invalidation.

The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.

Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.

To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521

#SPJ11

Arson and fire A fire scene's physical characteristics are examined by investigators, who also locate and gather tangible evidence there. The cause of the fire is then investigated using this evidence to assist determine whether it was accidental or intentional.

To learn more about fire investigators, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/29095087

Answer:

ok interesting

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Option C: The official documents the British Crown drafted to outline how the colonies should be managed are known as colonial charters.

A colony's charter establishes its legitimacy as a legal entity. Colonial charters were regarded as legitimate when the king awarded owners or a settlement company sole control over the management of land.

According to the colony's charters, there was no connection between the Crown and the colony's mother country. Trading companies in England were given the power to govern themselves by charters. The colony's administration, laws, and ordinances would be decided by the officers, but only as a conformation for the laws of England.

To know more about colonial charters, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/29327672

#SPJ4

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

The given statement "the chinese government passed a law that provided private property owners with the same protections granted to the state. hernando de soto would be in favor of this law." is False because Hernando de Soto would not be in favor of this law.

He was a strong advocate for the protection of the property rights of individuals and the need for developing countries to recognize and protect such rights.

De Soto argued that without secure property rights, individuals cannot use their assets as collateral for financial transactions, leaving them susceptible to exploitation by the state and unable to benefit from their resources. Thus, de Soto would not be supportive of a law that provided the same protections to the state as to individual property owners.

To know more about advocate , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28272829

#SPJ4

It's impossible to say how frequently false confessions occur. False confessions or admissions are known to be included in around 26% of unjust convictions of people who were late exonerated by DNA proof.

This lesson sequence is based on a standard forensics lab, only instead of analyzing DNA evidence to discover who committed a crime, students investigate the innocence of someone who has been wrongly accused.

A person who has been convicted of a crime gets exonerated when new proof of innocence is presented.

For more information about DNA exoneration refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/9653528

#SPJ1

The executive branch of the government is responsible for combating organized crime.

The executive branch includes law enforcement agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). These agencies work together to investigate, arrest, and prosecute individuals and organizations involved in organized criminal activity.

The executive branch also includes the Department of Justice, which oversees the prosecution of federal criminal cases.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) combats organized crime through a number of different strategies and initiatives. Some of the key ways in which the DOJ fights organized crime include:

Learn more about organized crime here:

https://brainly.com/question/30457855

#SPJ11

Answer:

reducing the number of hours committed to studying

Explanation:

hope it helps

\( \: \: \: \: \)

you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science

\( \: \: \: \: \: \)

No, the video cannot be used as evidence in this instance because Mandy was only videotaped as part of an experiment and her agreement only applied to the sleep study.

She was also certain that, as per the agreement between her and the group who carried out the experiment, the tapes would not be made public.

The field of medicine known as neurology is responsible for the diagnosis and care of all disorders and illnesses affecting the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves.

The discipline of neuroscience, the scientific study of the nervous system, is very important to neurological practice.

Learn more about neurology, from:

brainly.com/question/7165863

#SPJ1

Answer:

True

Explanation:

To the Court,

I am writing to present my position on the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, in which the defendant, Clarence Gideon, was denied the right to counsel in his criminal trial. I believe that the decision to deny Gideon the right to counsel was a grave injustice and violated his constitutional rights.

As you may be aware, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to counsel for all criminal defendants. However, this right has not always been upheld in practice. In the past, there have been numerous cases in which defendants have been denied the right to counsel, either because they could not afford an attorney or because they were not provided with one by the state.

Before Gideon's case, there were several notable examples of defendants being denied the right to counsel. For example, in Betts v. Brady (1942), the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a defendant who had been denied counsel on the grounds that the state had not provided him with an attorney. Similarly, in Powell v. Alabama (1932), the Court upheld the convictions of several defendants who had been denied counsel in a capital case, despite the fact that they had requested one.

These cases demonstrate a clear pattern of defendants being denied the right to counsel in violation of their constitutional rights. In Gideon's case, he was similarly denied the right to counsel, despite his repeated requests for an attorney. As a result, he was forced to represent himself in his criminal trial and was ultimately convicted and sentenced to prison.

Gideon's case was eventually appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled in his favor and held that the right to counsel was a fundamental right that applied to all criminal defendants, regardless of their ability to pay. The Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright was a landmark ruling that established the principle of equal justice under the law and ensured that all criminal defendants would have the right to counsel in the future.

The Gideon decision has had a significant impact on the legal system and has been used to argue for the right to counsel in numerous other cases. For example, in Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972), the Court applied the Gideon decision to hold that defendants in non-capital cases have the right to counsel, even if they cannot afford one. Similarly, in Scott v. Illinois (1979), the Court used the Gideon decision to hold that states are required to provide counsel to indigent defendants in all criminal cases, regardless of the severity of the charges.

In conclusion, I believe that the decision to deny Gideon the right to counsel was a grave injustice and violated his constitutional rights. The Gideon decision has had a significant impact on the legal system and has been used to argue for the right to counsel in numerous other cases. I hope that this summary of my position and the relevant case law helps the Court to understand the importance of the right to counsel and its role in ensuring equal justice under the law.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

The president is most likely to use executive privilege to close aid. Executive privilege is a common law-derived American principle that shields executive branch employees from subpoenas while they carry out their official duties.

The U.S. Congress requested in 1792 that documentation regarding a disastrous military expedition commanded by Gen. Arthur St. Clair against Native American tribes be examined. President George Washington's cabinet discussed this request.

Notes kept by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson revealed that the cabinet was in agreement that the president could do so when the public interest was at stake when discussing whether administrative actions or documents related to those actions could be withheld from Congress. Congress finally received the materials in question, but Washington later used many occasions to successfully establish executive privilege.

Learn more about executive privilege here:

https://brainly.com/question/17362417

#SPJ4

Your question seems to be incomplete, but most probably the complete question was:

The president is most likely to use executive privilege to

Close Kin

Close Aid

Close Knit.