The legal mechanism for evaluating the existence of an incentive or inducement for a person's promise which will establish a binding contract is called consideration.
Hence, the correct option is A.
A promise or agreement made voluntarily between two or more parties is referred to as a contract. A contract is only enforceable in court if all of the following conditions are met: the parties have reached an agreement; at least one of the parties has provided a consideration; both parties are of legal age and intend the contract to be enforceable in court; and all formalities have been followed. Consideration is an action taken by the offeree in return for the performance or failure to perform of an action that the offeror has promised. The payment of money is a common form of consideration, but it can also be a right, interest, profit, or other benefit that accrues to the offeror. The offeree must accept, or they will lose out. Without a consideration a contract is void.
Know more about " consideration" visit
brainly.com/question/13707742
#SPJ4
Why did President Truman go before a joint session of Congress after the British announced in 1947 that they could no longer afford to support the pro-western governments of the Mediterranean in their fight against communism?
Answer:
In February 1947, the British government informed the United States that it could no longer furnish the economic and military assistance it had been providing to Greece and Turkey since the end of World War II. The Truman administration believed that both nations were threatened by communism and it jumped at the chance to take a tough stance against the Soviet Union. In Greece, leftist forces had been battling the Greek royal government since the end of World War II. In Turkey, the Soviets were demanding some manner of control over the Dardanelles, territory from which Turkey was able to dominate the strategic waterway from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.
Explanation:
In February 1947, the British government informed the United States that it could no longer furnish the economic and military assistance it had been providing to Greece and Turkey since the end of World War II. The Truman administration believed that both nations were threatened by communism and it jumped at the chance to take a tough stance against the Soviet Union. In Greece, leftist forces had been battling the Greek royal government since the end of World War II. In Turkey, the Soviets were demanding some manner of control over the Dardanelles, territory from which Turkey was able to dominate the strategic waterway from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.
how long is a term for a person elected to the senate.
who is responsible for the organization and operation of state corrections systems?
The responsibility for the organization and operation of state corrections systems rests primarily with state governments.
State corrections systems are responsible for the management of correctional facilities, probation and parole services, and other aspects related to the incarceration and rehabilitation of individuals convicted of crimes within a specific state. Each state has its own department or agency dedicated to corrections, which oversees the administration and operation of correctional institutions, community supervision programs, and support services for inmates and parolees.
Typically, state departments of corrections are headed by a director or commissioner who is appointed by the state governor or selected through a similar process. These directors, along with their staff, are responsible for setting policies, managing budgets, establishing facility standards, implementing rehabilitation programs, ensuring the safety and security of inmates and staff, and coordinating with other criminal justice entities within the state.
While there may be some involvement of federal authorities, such as the Federal Bureau of Prisons in managing federal correctional facilities, the primary responsibility for state corrections systems lies with the respective state governments. They have the authority and oversight to make decisions regarding the organization and operation of their own corrections systems based on state laws and policies.
To read more about State Governments click here
https://brainly.com/question/2397819
#SPJ11
In 100 words or more, discuss the forensic significance of bloodstain pattern analysis.
Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) is a forensic technique that involves the examination of bloodstain patterns to infer the events that led to the bloodshed. BPA can provide crucial information for criminal investigations by reconstructing the sequence of events, identifying the weapon used, determining the position and movements of the victim and perpetrator, and corroborating or contradicting witness testimony.
BPA can help answer questions such as whether the victim was standing or lying down when injured, the direction of blood flow, and the number of blows or wounds inflicted. By analyzing the size, shape, distribution, and location of bloodstains, BPA can help investigators establish the credibility of a witness's account of events, and identify inconsistencies or discrepancies in their testimony.
BPA can also help identify suspects by analyzing bloodstain patterns on their clothing or body. For example, the presence of spatter stains on a suspect's clothing may indicate their involvement in a violent crime.
Overall, BPA is a valuable tool in criminal investigations and can provide crucial evidence that can be used in court to support or refute witness testimony, reconstruct events, and help identify suspects
1) Summarize why immigration is an important issue in the United States. Include how immigrants can become citizens.
2) What states or areas in the country have the greatest concerns over immigration policy? Explain your response.
3) From what country do most immigrants (legal and illegal) originate? How has this affected how the United States approaches the issue?
4) Do you think the DREAM Act would have been an effective approach to the immigration issue? Explain why or why not. Include your opinions on any other suggestions you have studied
Immigration in the United States is a multifaceted issue with impacts on the economy, national security, and social systems. The DREAM Act would have provided a viable solution for young undocumented immigrants to gain legal status.
1. Immigration is an essential issue in the United States because it affects the economy, national security, and social systems of the country. Immigration boosts the economy through increased labor supply, new entrepreneurs, and investors. Immigrants also take part in contributing to the economy and workforce. Immigrants who wish to become citizens must follow certain requirements, including filing an application, taking a civics test, and going through an interview process. If the requirements are met, the immigrant can receive a green card, which is the first step in obtaining citizenship.
2. The states or areas in the country that have the greatest concerns over immigration policy are the border states, such as Arizona, Texas, and California. These states have the highest levels of illegal immigration and experience the highest cost of living.
3. The country that most immigrants (legal and illegal) originate from is Mexico. This has affected how the United States approaches the issue because there is a large number of undocumented Mexican immigrants in the country. The issue has become more politically charged, and politicians on both sides have used the issue as a political tool.
4. The DREAM Act would have been an effective approach to the immigration issue because it would have allowed young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children to gain legal status. The act would have required individuals to have completed high school or obtained a GED passed a criminal background check, and be of good moral character. These individuals could then earn citizenship through college education, military service, or employment.
To learn more about Immigration
https://brainly.com/question/17141328
#SPJ11
Molly is a director and ned is an officer of online education inc. liability for the torts of employees
under their supervision may extend to
o a molly and ned.
b. molly only
o c ned only
o d. none of the choices.
Under the supervision of both of these parties, the liability for the tort may fall under a molly and Ned.
What is the torts of employees?
This is a term that has to do with the wrongful act in the work place that could cause an employee to take an action against an employer.
The tort of the employee could be due to harassment or action s of discrimination in the workplace.
Read more on torts here: https://brainly.com/question/988936
#SPJ1
Journalist’s Notes:
Within the span of three months, several homes on one side of town have been broken into during the day. No one is ever home at the time, and numerous high value items have been stolen. Additionally, three local businesses have been broken into at night after closing. Cash was stolen from the safes in two of the businesses. The third business is a hardware store and several expensive tools were stolen. During this time period, two bicycles and one all-terrain vehicle were also stolen while left outside unattended; it is unclear if these thefts were committed by the same offender(s) breaking into homes and businesses.
Finally, two disturbing incidents occurred in the midst of these crimes.
First, a man with a gun forcefully pushed a man who was stopped at a red light off of his motorcycle. The gunman then hopped on the motorcycle and sped off.
Second, two women got into an altercation in the mall parking lot when one woman accused the other of stealing her parking spot. The angry woman parked her truck behind the other woman’s car, blocking it in. She then proceeded to kick and hit the other woman for several minutes before grabbing a baseball bat from her truck and hitting the other woman in the back with it. She then smashed the windshield and drove off.
Answer:
Description of Criminal Act: A man with a gun forcefully pushed a man who was stopped at a red light off of his motorcycle. The gunman then hopped on the motorcycle and sped off.
Type of Crime: Robbery
Property or Violent Crime:
Violent (The man had a "gun", this could be a threat of harm. Making the other man not to fight the gunman for his bike back. The gunman then forcefully pulled the man off his motorcycle.
Explanation:
______ theory holds that deviant and criminal behavior results from regular exposure to attitudes favorable to acting in ways that are deviant or criminal.
The theory that holds that deviant and criminal behavior results from regular exposure to attitudes favorable to acting in ways that are deviant or criminal is called "Social Learning Theory".
This theory posits that individuals learn how to behave through observation, imitation, and reinforcement of behaviors exhibited by those around them, including family members, peers, and media figures. According to social learning theory, if an individual is repeatedly exposed to deviant or criminal attitudes and behaviors, they may be more likely to adopt similar attitudes and engage in similar behaviors.Social Learning Theory was developed by Albert Bandura in the 1960s and 1970s. Bandura argued that behavior is learned through a process of observation and imitation, and that people are more likely to imitate behavior that is rewarded or reinforced in some way. He also suggested that behavior is influenced by factors such as cognition, motivation, and self-efficacy.
Social Learning Theory has been applied in a variety of contexts, including criminology and psychology. In criminology, the theory is often used to explain why some individuals become involved in criminal activities, while others do not. The theory suggests that exposure to deviant or criminal behavior may increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in similar behavior, and that prevention efforts should focus on reducing exposure to these behaviors.
Learn more about Social Learning Theory here;
https://brainly.com/question/22761112
#SPJ11
A defendant was tearing up a stretch of pavement with a jackhammer when a rock flew up and struck a plaintiff in the head, causing him to be hospitalized. Because the jackhammer manufacturer had been out of business for several years, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for his medical costs, lost work time, and pain and suffering solely against the defendant. At trial, the plaintiff's attorney calls a witness who testifies that, at the time of the incident, the defendant stated, "It was my fault." The defense attorney objects, but the judge overrules the objection on the ground that this is a declaration against interest.Are the grounds for the judge's decision correct?
Yes, the grounds for the judge's decision are correct.
A declaration against interest is a statement made by a party that is against their own interests, and is generally admissible as evidence in a court of law. In this case, the defendant's statement "It was my fault" is a declaration against their own interest, as it suggests that they are responsible for the plaintiff's injuries. As such, the statement is admissible as evidence, and the judge's decision to overrule the defence attorney's objection is correct.
To know more about judge's decision:
https://brainly.com/question/29553439
#SPJ11
TRUE/FALSE. to increase revenue, the provincial government of saskatchewan has decided to open up millions of acres of previously unavailable land, and to rent it to farmers. at the same time, world corn prices increase.
True, to increase revenue, the provincial government of Saskatchewan has decided to open up millions of acres of previously unavailable land, and to rent it to farmers. At the same time, world corn prices increase.
Which factor will determine how many acres of land to rent?
Given that,
To increase the revenue, the provincial government of Saskatchewan has decided to open up millions of acres of previously unavailable land.
In competitive market as this is shown to be, people will rent until the marginal revenue product from land is equal to the rental rates.
Therefore, the attached graph provides a clearer idea.
What is a revenue?
In the context of accounting, revenue refers to the total income from sales of products and services that are directly connected to the company's core operations. Sales or turnover are two more terms for commercial revenue. Interest, royalties, and other fees are sources of income for some businesses. The term "revenue" can refer to income in general or to the sum, expressed in money terms, received during a certain period of time, as in "Last year, Company X had revenue of $42 million." Profits or net income often refer to total revenue less total costs for a specific time period. Due to its prominence at the top of the income statement, revenue is sometimes referred to as the "top line" in accounting. Revenue is a component of the Equity section in the balance statement and raises equity. Compared to the "bottom line," which represents net income, this is to be compared (gross revenues minus total expenses).
To learn more about revenue from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/16232387
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. to increase revenue, the provincial government of saskatchewan has decided to open up millions of acres of previously unavailable land, and to rent it to farmers. at the same time, world corn prices increase.
Jane Smith listed and sold a company’s building, for which the company paid her a fee. Which would be TRUE regarding this situation?
Answer: You did not give the answer choices
Explanation: I will answer this once you do
Which search pattern is used when you have many investigators available and are looking
for a missing person?
O Line or Strip search
O Grid search
Spiral search
Quadrant or Sone search
Answer:
I think grid search could be used when you have many investigators available and are looking for the same person
You are a doctor in a small CityTwo weeks ago, the City was a legal marijuanamunicipality (For Medicinal Use only) but later decided not to participate in the legalized trade What is the legal ramification of your decision
My decision would be that marijuana should not be used.
What is marijuana?Cannabis, a psychoactive substance derived from the cannabis plant, is sometimes referred to as marijuana[b] and other names. The cannabis plant, which is native to Central or South Asia, has been used for thousands of years in traditional remedies as well as as a narcotic for entheogenic and recreational purposes. The primary psychoactive component of cannabis is tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), one of the 483 known plant chemicals. This number includes at least 65 other cannabinoids, including cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabis can be used orally, vapourizingly, ingested, or utilized as an extract. Cannabis produces a variety of psychological and physiological effects, including euphoria, altered states of consciousness and perception of time, trouble focusing, reduced short-term memory, poor balance and fine psychomotor control, relaxation, and an increase in hunger. When smoked, the effects start to kick in quickly; when eaten, it might take up to 90 minutes. The duration of the effects varies from two to six hours depending on the dosage. Mental side effects at high dosages might include paranoia, psychosis, hallucinations, anxiety, delusions (including notions of reference), and panic.
To know more about marijuana, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28036800
#SPJ1
The exclusionary rule states that Group of answer choices federal law cannot be applied in state courts. the laws of one state court cannot be applied in the courts of another state. evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. state law cannot be applied in federal courts. none of the above.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Therefore option (C) is the correct answer.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This rule prevents police officers from using evidence that they have collected in violation of an individual's constitutional rights. Therefore, if the court finds that evidence was obtained through illegal means, it will not be allowed to be used during a trial.The exclusionary rule does not prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in all circumstances. The rule only applies if the evidence was obtained in a manner that violates a person's constitutional rights.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. This means that if the evidence is collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it cannot be used in court against that individual. In summary, the correct option for the question is: Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Option (C) is correct answer.
Learn more about exclusionary rule https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ11
What does bloodstain pattern analysis tell us in regard to the victim and suspect?
Answer:
Information that may be gained with bloodstain pattern analysis include, for example, the position of the individual when the blood was deposited (sitting, standing, etc.), the relative position of individuals at the time of bloodshed, the possible type of weapon used as well as possible mechanisms that could have ..THE MONKEY'S PAW
ESCAPE ROOM code
Answer:
The the hek does that mean?
Private law pertains to personal rights, such as the right
to protect one’s own property and interests.
Select one:
True
False
The statement "Private law pertains to personal rights, such as the right to protect one’s own property and interests." is true as private laws are for individual liberty.
Private law also referred to as civil law is a subset of the law that addresses the rights and connections between people or entities. It includes individual rights, such as the right to safeguard one's own assets and interests. Numerous facets of daily life are governed by private law including contracts, property ownership, torts, family law and business dealings.
It focuses on resolving conflicts between private parties and offering remedies for any wrongdoing or rights violations. Public law which deals with issues pertaining to the government and the relationship between the state and its citizens is distinct from private law.
Learn more about Private law at:
brainly.com/question/32182909
#SPJ4
Match these items. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column.
1. announcement Delegates nominate candidates for offices and Congress, and delegates to the national convention.
2. caucus Members of one party move into the primary of the other party to choose candidates.
3. closed primary A gathering of party leaders to talk over possible candidates.
4. county convention The most votes cast, but not necessarily a majority.
5. declaration of candidacy Qualified voters vote for the candidates without revealing their party membership.
6. direct primary The voter declares his party allegiance and votes for the ballot of his own party.
7. open primary The members vote, by secret ballot, to choose their candidate for the general election.
8. party-raiding The individual fills out documentation and pays a filing fee to announce that he seeks a political office.
9. plurality Person wishes to be a candidate for the party, so he makes an announcement of intention.
10. state convention Delegates nominate most county officers and chose delegates to the state convention.
The political terms and their meanings have been matched in the space that we have below
How to match the itemsstate convention - Delegates nominate candidates for offices and Congress, and delegates to the national convention.party-raiding - Members of one party move into the primary of the other party to choose candidates.closed primary - The voter declares his party allegiance and votes for the ballot of his own party.plurality - The most votes cast, but not necessarily a majority.declaration of candidacy - Person wishes to be a candidate for the party, so he makes an announcement of intention.direct primary - Qualified voters vote for the candidates without revealing their party membership.open primary - The members vote, by secret ballot, to choose their candidate for the general election.caucus - A gathering of party leaders to talk over possible candidates.announcement - The individual fills out documentation and pays a filing fee to announce that he seeks a political office.county convention - Delegates nominate most county officers and choose delegates to the state convention.Read more on convention here:https://brainly.com/question/28442712
#SPJ1
Which of the following guidelines has HHS established as standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace?
A. Obtain the consent of the individual, employer, or employee prior to conducting an online person search, assisting with of facilitating enrollment through the Marketplace, assisting the individual in applying for APTC and CSRs, and making updates to a consumer's eligibility application or subsequent plan selection and enrollment.
B. Protect consumer's personally identifiable information (PII)
C. Provide consumers with connect information regarding the Marketplace, QHPs offered through the Marketplace, and insurance affordability programs.
D. Refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
The guidelines that the Health and Human Services has established as standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
What is the Health and Human Services?This is a federal service that established the standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace in order to protect against conduct that is harmful to consumers or prevents the efficient operation of the Marketplace
Hence, the guidelines on standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
Read more about HHS
brainly.com/question/2093822
#SPJ1
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime
Yes the law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own because they have been given authority by the government of their nation, as well as sufficient resources and weapons to fight crime.
What is a law enforcement agency?A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government organization tasked with upholding the law. It is referred to as operating inside a jurisdiction when LEAs have some kind of restriction on how they can use their authority. By allowing the exchange of information required for law enforcement between LEAs inside those countries, LEAs that operate across a number of countries, such as Europol, tend to support law enforcement efforts rather than actively enforcing laws. An international law enforcement agency, like Interpol, has authority over and/or conducts operations across national borders in several different countries. A multinational law enforcement agency is one that employs people from various nations but normally only operates in one nation or region of a nation.
To learn more about law enforcement agencies, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14328441
#SPJ2
_can be used to assess_
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
The state of Texas enacts a law that prohibits Asian men from saying the word "God" on any day that is not Sunday. Discuss all of the potential Constitutional law violations that are at play with this law, and how they are at play based on the facts in the prompt.
Answer:
Never will i answer your quesTimon dolt
Explanation:
under the residential mortgage lending act, the minimum surety bond required is_____.
Under the residential mortgage lending act, the minimum surety bond required is 0.5% of the aggregate loan amount.
The Residential Mortgage Lending Act may have different minimum surety bond requirements. State specific legislation known as the Residential Mortgage Lending Act controls mortgage lending practices in that state. As a result, there may be regional variations in the minimum surety bond requirement. To ascertain the precise minimum surety bond amount that is required for mortgage lenders operating within that jurisdiction.
According to the Residential Mortgage Lending Act the bond must equal 0.5% of the total loan amount of residential mortgage loans that were originated in the year before.
Learn more about residential mortgage at:
brainly.com/question/33116872
#SPJ4
Where is my dad.....
Answer:
getting milk for youuuuuu :)
Answer:
I really don't know but hopefully, you find out.
Explanation:
under the business judgment rule, a director or officer can be held legally liable for bad (mistaken) business decisions. T/F
FALSE. A director or officer cannot be held legally accountable for poor (misguided) business judgments under the business judgment rule. Instead, the regulation offers some protection to directors and officers from lawsuits that are only based on the results of their choices.
What is the rule of business judgment? According to a legal principle known as the "business judgment rule," an organization's board of directors and officials are assumed to be working in the organization's best interests. According to this principle, which is based on trust and responsibility, courts should give weight to the wise business decisions made by company directors and officials. In other words, the business judgment rule shields directors and officers against lawsuits that are purely based on the results of their choices.
To know about Business Judgement Rule:
https://brainly.com/question/28320633
#SPJ11
some framers of the constitution believed that adding a bill of rights would be dangerous. T/F
The statement is true. Some framers of the Constitution believed that adding a Bill of Rights would be dangerous.
Their concerns were based on the idea that by listing specific rights, it might imply that those were the only rights protected, and any rights not mentioned would be vulnerable. They also believed that the Constitution, by design, limited the government's power enough to protect individual liberties without the need for a Bill of Rights. Despite these concerns, the Bill of Rights was eventually added as the first ten amendments to the Constitution to address the concerns of those who felt that additional safeguards were necessary to protect individual liberties.
To learn more about Constitution, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30039586
#SPJ11
Promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be _____ by management.
An form of promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be stopped by management.
What is an intemperate consumption of alcohol?This refers to the consumption of alcohol in an excessive way that can cause great damage to the person engaged in such reckless and harmful habit.
Despite that promotions are designed to increase brand awareness, create interest, generate sales or create brand loyalty, any form of promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be stopped by management.
Therefore, the word "stopped" is the correct word.
Read more about intemperate
brainly.com/question/11530556
#SPJ1
Define the term concept
Answer:
mean what exists in the mind as a representation (as of something comprehended) or as a formulation (as of a plan). IDEA may apply to a mental image or formulation of something seen or known or imagined, to a pure abstraction, or to something assumed or vaguely sensed. innovative ideas my idea of paradise CONCEPT may apply to the idea formed by consideration of instances of a species or genus or, more broadly, to any idea of what a thing ought to be. a society with no concept of private property CONCEPTION is often interchangeable with CONCEPT; it may stress the process of imagining or formulating rather than the result. our changing conception of what constitutes art THOUGHT is likely to suggest the result of reflecting, reasoning, or meditating rather than of imagining. commit your thoughts to paper NOTION suggests an idea not much resolved by analysis or reflection and may suggest the capricious or accidental. you have the oddest notions IMPRESSION applies to an idea or notion resulting immediately from some stimulation of the senses. the first impression is of soaring height
Explanation:
hope it helps
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT CASE BRIEF
FIND THE FOLLOWING CASE AND BRIEF IT...
KIRKPATRICK V. ETC, INTERNATIONAL, 493 U.S. 400 (1990)
When briefing the case it needs to have a paragraph each for the facts, issues, rule, answer and the conclusion
Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990) is a case that focuses on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
ETC International is a company that provides simulation and control systems to aerospace, aviation, and defense industries. In an attempt to secure a contract with the Mexican government, ETC made several payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, sued the company, claiming that these payments were made to obtain favorable treatment and violate the FCPA.Facts:Environmental Tectonics Corp. (ETC) is a firm based in Pennsylvania that offers simulation and control systems for aviation, aerospace, and defense businesses. In the early 1980s, the company sought to secure a contract with the Mexican government and, as part of that effort, made various payments to Mexican officials. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, filed a suit against the firm, alleging that the payments were made to secure favorable treatment and that the payments were in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Issues:The issue at hand is whether Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) made payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s to secure a contract with the Mexican government. In addition, whether the payments were made to gain a favorable treatment or violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Rule:The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a U.S. law enacted in 1977 that makes it unlawful for companies that trade in the United States to pay bribes to foreign officials to obtain business deals.Answer:The United States Supreme Court, in this case, ruled in favor of Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) and overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals. The Court held that the FCPA did not apply to this case since the payments made by ETC were not in connection with obtaining or retaining business. The Court also held that the SEC cannot enforce the FCPA with a civil action, and only the Department of Justice (DOJ) can. Finally, the Court found that a private party has no right of action under the FCPA.In conclusion, the Court's decision in Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990), clarified the scope and limits of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although ETC made payments to Mexican officials, the Court held that the payments did not violate the FCPA because they were not made in connection with obtaining or retaining business. As a result, the Court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals and held that Kirkpatrick had no right of action under the FCPA.
To Know More about obtaining visit:
brainly.com/question/2075542
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the correct pairing of procedures or rules of each house of the legislative branch?
-Has a Rules Committee that decides how long debate will be on most bills.
senate
- Has use of the filibuster and cloture, which can help the minority to defeat a bill.
The correct pairing of procedures or rules of each house of the legislative branch are: House of Representatives -
Has a Rules Committee that decides how long debate will be on most bills; Senate - Has use of the filibuster and cloture, which can help the minority to defeat a bill. The legislative branch is one of the three branches of the federal government.
The legislative branch is made up of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Constitution grants Congress a great deal of authority, including the ability to declare war, levy taxes, regulate commerce, and establish a national currency.
In the House of Representatives, the Rules Committee decides how long debate will be on most bills. In the Senate, the filibuster and cloture can help the minority to defeat a bill.
The filibuster is a tactic used by minority senators to obstruct or block a vote on a bill by speaking for an extended period of time. Cloture is a procedure for ending debate and bringing a bill to a vote, requiring a three-fifths majority vote (60 senators).
This procedure was first adopted by the Senate in 1917, with the aim of ending filibusters during World War I. Since then, it has been used to end filibusters on numerous occasions, including the civil rights movement of the 1960s.
To know more about legislative branch refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/11883152#
#SPJ11