Answers
Research evidence suggests that, when judges and juries disagree on a verdict, juries are more lenient in their decision-making compared to judges.
Studies examining the dynamics between judges and juries have found that juries tend to be more sympathetic and lenient towards defendants, particularly in criminal cases. This leniency can manifest in a variety of ways, such as reduced sentences, lower conviction rates, or acquittals.
One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the composition and decision-making process of juries. Juries are typically composed of laypeople from the community who may bring their own values, biases, and life experiences into the deliberation room. Unlike judges, who are legal professionals with extensive knowledge of the law, juries may be more inclined to consider factors such as empathy, personal experiences, and community standards when reaching a verdict.
Furthermore, research has shown that juries tend to place a greater emphasis on the burden of proof and the presumption of innocence. They may require stronger evidence or a higher standard of proof to convict a defendant. This cautious approach can lead to a higher likelihood of disagreement with judges who may have a more rigid interpretation of the law or a stricter view of guilt.
It is worth noting that disagreements between judges and juries on verdicts do occur, although they are not necessarily pervasive. These disagreements can arise due to differences in legal interpretation, the weight assigned to evidence, or the application of legal standards to the case. However, the research indicates that when such disagreements arise, juries are more likely to exhibit leniency compared to judges.
In summary, research evidence suggests that when judges and juries disagree on a verdict, juries are more lenient in their decision-making. The leniency exhibited by juries can be attributed to factors such as their composition, reliance on personal experiences, community standards, and a cautious approach to ensure the burden of proof is met. While disagreements between judges and juries on verdicts do happen, the research supports the notion that juries are more inclined towards leniency compared to judges.
Learn more about judges here
https://brainly.com/question/29292037
#SPJ11
Related Questions
the federal government's biggest single source of revenue is from
Answers
The federal government's biggest single source of revenue is from the individual income tax.
The Internal Revenue Service collects money from every individual who earns an income, which includes wages, salaries, bonuses, tips, and other forms of compensation. The amount of tax owed is calculated based on the individual's taxable income, which is the difference between their gross income and any deductions they may be eligible for. The tax rate is progressive, meaning that individuals who earn more money pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than those who earn less.
In addition to individual income tax, the federal government also collects revenue from corporate income tax, social insurance taxes (including Social Security and Medicare), excise taxes on goods such as alcohol and tobacco, and various fees and tariffs. However, individual income tax remains the largest source of revenue, accounting for over 50% of the federal government's total revenue.
The revenue generated from individual income tax is used to fund a variety of federal programs, including national defense, healthcare, education, infrastructure, and social welfare programs. In recent years, there has been much debate over the appropriate level of taxation, with some arguing that taxes should be lowered to stimulate economic growth, and others advocating for higher taxes to fund increased government spending.
Regardless of the outcome of these debates, it is clear that individual income tax will remain the federal government's largest source of revenue for the foreseeable future.
For more such questions on federal government
https://brainly.com/question/31134219
#SPJ4
discuss in two ways how you would evaluate the outcomes of the campaign
Answers
The two ways that a campaign could be evaluated are:
Measuring the campaign's impact on key performance indicators (KPIs)Conducting surveys or focus groupsWhat is the outcomes evaluation?To assess the effectiveness of a campaign, it is important to measure its impact on certain KPIs that were targeted for improvement. These may include sales, website visits, social media interaction, or overall brand exposure.
Evaluating the success of the campaign is achievable by utilizing surveys or organizing focus groups crafted to measure its impact in accomplishing its objectives.
Learn more about outcomes from
https://brainly.com/question/25688842
#SPJ1
What were the positive and negative consequences of a limited national government? Which
Americans were satisfied with government under the Articles of Confederation? Why?
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
I had the same answer
Will the global power struggle ever end? Defend both positions (yes and no). Which position do you find most compelling and why? Be sure to incorporate Realist and Liberal arguments as well as examples from your text. Cite all sources.
Answers
Answer:
The question of whether the global power struggle will ever end is a complex one, with compelling arguments on both sides. On one hand, it can be argued that the global power struggle will never end, as states will always seek to maximize their power and influence in order to ensure their survival and security. This realist perspective suggests that international politics is inherently competitive, with states competing for resources, territory, and influence. In this view, the international system is a zero-sum game, where one state's gain is another's loss.
Proponents of this view argue that even in a world where cooperation and interdependence have increased, the underlying competition between states remains. For example, despite the growing economic interdependence between the United States and China, there are still tensions and conflicts between the two countries over issues such as trade, human rights, and territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Additionally, the ongoing arms race between nuclear-armed states such as the United States, Russia, and China suggests that states are still pursuing military power and strategic advantage.
On the other hand, it can be argued that the global power struggle can be mitigated and eventually overcome through cooperation and the development of global governance institutions. This liberal perspective suggests that states can work together to address common problems and pursue common goals, such as economic development, environmental protection, and human rights. In this view, the international system is not a zero-sum game, but rather a positive-sum game where cooperation can benefit all parties involved.
Proponents of this view point to examples of successful international cooperation, such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and the International Criminal Court. These institutions and agreements demonstrate that states can work together to address global challenges and promote shared values. Additionally, the growth of civil society organizations and transnational social movements suggests that individuals and groups beyond the state are playing an increasingly important role in shaping international politics.
In my opinion, while the realist argument has some merit, I find the liberal perspective more compelling. While competition between states may never fully disappear, I believe that cooperation and global governance institutions can help mitigate the negative effects of this competition and promote greater stability and prosperity for all. The examples of successful international cooperation and the growth of civil society organizations and transnational social movements give me hope that a more peaceful and cooperative global order is possible.
Sources:
Mearsheimer, J. (2019). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Yale University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and Interdependence (3rd ed.). Longman.
United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from
Paris Agreement. (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from
Explanation:
an asset's capitalized cost basis includes only the actual purchase price, whereas expenses to purchase, prepare the asset for use, and begin using the asset are immediately expensed.
Answers
Capitalized cost refers to the cost of acquiring an asset and preparing it for use, which is recorded as an asset on a company's balance sheet rather than as an expense on its income statement.
When calculating the capitalized cost basis, only the actual purchase price of the asset is included, while expenses incurred to purchase, prepare, and begin using the asset are immediately expensed instead of being included in the asset's capitalized cost basis.
For instance, if a company buys a new machine for $10,000 and spends an additional $2,000 on installation and setup, the capitalized cost of the machine would be $10,000 since only the purchase price is included in the capitalized cost basis while the additional $2,000 would be immediately expensed.
Capitalized cost is an important metric for companies as it represents the total cost of an asset over its useful life, which is used to calculate the asset's depreciation expense.
To know more about Capitalized cost, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29489546#
#SPJ11
FILL IN THE BLANK _____ takes place when one who has a duty to act reasonably acts carelessly and causes injury to another.
Answers
A breach of a legal obligation to exercise care that causes harm to the plaintiff that the defendant does not want to cause is referred to as negligence as a tort.
What is the phrase used to describe thoughtless behavior?Negligence is the act of acting in a careless, reckless, or negligent manner that harms another person or damages their property.
Why is the reasonable person standard used in negligence cases to determine if a duty was broken?The "reasonable person" defense, which establishes the standard by which the defendant's behavior should be judged, is one of the most important arguments used in negligence trials. The definition states that "a person has engaged in negligent behavior" if they have strayed from the course of action that would be expected of a reasonably sensible person acting in the same situation.
Learn more about negligence: https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ4
What happens when the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional ?
Answers
If a law is deemed unconstitutional, the courts can declare it unenforceable, and Congress can repeal the unconstitutional law to avoid confusion or include similar policies to try to achieve its goals.
A new version may choose to replace that law.
The Supreme Court has the power to conduct judicial review whenever Congress proposes new legislation.
During its review, the Supreme Court carefully considers each content of the proposed law. If any part of the content violates the rules laid down in the Constitution, those laws are considered "unconstitutional" and must be amended before they can pass.
To learn more about 'Supreme court', here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
In 2006, maximum fine for an indecency regulation violation was raised to $100,000. T/F
Answers
The given statement, "In 2006, maximum fine for an indecency regulation violation was raised to $100,000," is false because the maximum fine for an indecency regulation violation was not raised to $100,000 in 2006.
Prior to 2006, the maximum fine for an indecency regulation violation was $32,500. However, in 2006, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed increasing the maximum fine for indecency violations to $325,000 per violation. This proposal was part of an effort to crack down on indecent content on broadcast television and radio.
However, the proposed increase faced significant opposition and legal challenges, which eventually led to its reversal. In 2012, a federal appeals court ruled that the FCC's indecency enforcement policy was unconstitutional, effectively nullifying the proposed increase in fines.
Learn more about the supreme court: https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ11
Question 10 of 10
Which situation best illustrates how global trade promotes specialization?
Answers
Answer:
trade
Explanation:
Answer:
a country focuses on developing software instead of growing food because it can import food from its neighbors
Explanation:
Just got it right on my quiz!
Forensic Pathology
Forensic Computer Science
Criminalistics
Forensic Entomologist
Crime Scene Investigator
Firearm Examiner
Forensic Photographer
Questioned Document Examiner
Forensic Engineering
Trace Evidence Examiner
Forensic Odontology
Latent Print Examiner
Forensic Toxicologist
Forensic Serologist/Forensic Biologist
______________________ – (or Forensic Science) the application of science in collecting and analyzing physical evidence in criminal cases (court of law)
______________________– processes crime scenes to collect and preserve physical evidence
______________________– uses photographic techniques to document crime scenes and evidence, as well as provide image enhancements and exhibits for analysis and courtroom presentation
______________________– identifies and/or compares physical evidence through chemical, physical, and instrumental analysis
______________________– processes and examines latent fingerprints in criminal cases
______________________– processes, compares, and/or identifies biological evidence in criminal cases
______________________– examines body fluids and organs to determine the presence of drugs and poisons
______________________– studies the handwriting and typeface on questioned documents to determine their authenticity and/or origin
______________________– examines firearms and discharged ammunition; also conducts distance determination and tool mark examination
______________________– studies insects to estimate the time of death
______________________– collects and identifies data from computers and other digital devices
______________________– concerned with failure analysis, accident reconstruction, and causes and origins of fires or explosions
______________________– identifies and compares dental evidence in criminal cases
______________________ – a branch of medicine used for legal purposes and concerned with determining causes of death
Answers
2- Crime Scene Investigator
3- Forensic Photographer
4- Trace Evidence Examiner
5- Latent Print Examiner
6- Forensic Serologist/Forensic Biologist
7- Forensic Toxicologist
8- Questioned Document Examiner
9- Firearm Examiner
10- Forensic Entomologist
11- Forensic Computer Science
12- Forensic Engineering
13- Forensic Odontology
14- Forensic Pathology
Answer: im probly late fro this but...
Explanation:
1- Crime Scene Investigator
2- Criminalistics
3- Forensic Photographer
4- Trace Evidence Examiner
5- Latent Print Examiner
6- Forensic Serologist/Forensic Biologist
7- Forensic Toxicologist
8- Questioned Document Examiner
9- Firearm Examiner
10- Forensic Entomologist
11- Forensic Computer Science
12- Forensic Engineering
13- Forensic Odontology
14- Forensic Pathology
What's the most powerful position in the senate
Answers
Senate majority leader
PLEASE HELP:
What percentage of law enforcement agencies use community policing?
A. 87 percent
B. 56 percent
C. 94 percent
D. 62 percent
Answers
87 percent of law enforcement agencies use community policing. Thus, option A is the correct option.
Community policing is a widely embraced approach by law enforcement agencies, with a staggering 87 percent adoption rate. This approach focuses on building strong partnerships between law enforcement personnel and the communities they serve.
Through this collaborative effort, law enforcement agencies aim to address local issues and concerns, prevent crime, and improve public safety. Community policing strategies revolve around proactive engagement, problem-solving, and trust-building initiatives. By involving community members in decision-making processes, law enforcement agencies can tap into their invaluable knowledge and support to effectively identify and solve local problems.
This widespread utilization of community policing reflects its proven effectiveness and recognition among law enforcement agencies as a key tool for promoting safe and inclusive communities.
Thus, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about community policing here:
https://brainly.com/question/32898107
#SPJ6
. Justices are known as important political ______________________________.
Answers
Answer:
Officials.
Explanation:
A justice is the official who exercises judicial power, either alone or as part of a multi-member body. The powers, duties, manner of appointment, discipline and training of justices vary widely between different jurisdictions. The justice must conduct the trial impartially and, usually, in an open court. The justice hears all the witnesses and any other evidence presented by the lawyers of the case, evaluates the credibility and arguments of the parties and then issues a decision on the matter based on the interpretation of the law and their personal judgment. In some jurisdictions, the power of the justice may be shared with a jury.
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by "reasonableness
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by "reasonableness
Why has the government chosen to provide monetary incentives to bring about the move to health information exchange?
Answers
Answer:
Governments can offer financial assistance to private businesses making investments through the use of economic incentives. Incentives can include tax abatements, tax revenue sharing, grants, infrastructure assistance, no or low-interest financing, free land, tax credits and other financial resources. But the question is, why? Why do government agencies invest public resources to support business development? The answer lies within the classic “but for” requirement of economic incentives. Understanding the “but for” and how to properly prepare the information required by government entities is critical to your project’s success.
Explanation:
Here is my best answer to help you out.
Person responsible for supplying the facts of what they know about a crime during a trial is *
A) bailiff
B) plaintiff
C) defendant
D) witness
Answers
Answer:
it would be D, a witness.
Explanation:
bailiff is in charge of court room security
plaintiff is the person bringing the charges
defendant is the person accused of a crime or some kind of wrong doing
Answer:
D a witness
Explanation:
he or she tells the truth
which of the following ethical principles dictates that a cost accountant, when faced with unethical issues, should follow the established policies of the organization?
Answers
The ethical principle that dictates that a cost accountant, when faced with unethical issues, should follow the established policies of the organization is known as the "Integrity Principle."
Ethics principles are standards that help professionals distinguish right from wrong, and they govern our behavior in a particular environment. These principles are critical to corporate governance, and they must be strictly adhered to by everyone who works there.Cost accountants must understand the company's guidelines and regulations to ensure that they adhere to the standards set forth. If a cost accountant discovers unethical conduct, they should follow established procedures and regulations in place in the organization to address the problem.In addition, the cost accountant must be true to their values and be straightforward in their dealings with the company. This ethical behavior creates a positive atmosphere and prevents scandals and misconduct in the future. Therefore, following established policies of the organization is important for cost accountants who are facing unethical issues.Learn more about ethical principle: https://brainly.com/question/18401975
#SPJ11
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
Answers
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
please for the love of someone help me
i have make a business plan about selling gidgits on the internet
Answers
Answer:
you can go wix, it is a website builder
Explanation:
i hope this helps.
Answer:
I'm not sure what the answer to the assignment is but I'm stuck on the same one and I wanted to copy and paste the rest of the assignment if anyone wants to answer its an edge assignment for Legal Environment. Heres a sceenshot.
Explanation:
QUESTION 4
Malik and Zahara are neighbors involved in a boundary dispute. Malik sues Zahara, and Zahara receives written notice that Malik has
filed a lawsuit against her. Zahara has received
Oa an answer.
Oba default judgment.
4
Answers
What Zahara has received is C. a court summons.
What is a court summons?A court summons is an official notice of a lawsuit issued by a court to a person being sued.
The purpose of a summons is to notify the defendant about the court file and the date they are required to appear before the court.
Thus, what Zahara has received is a C. a court summons, not an answer or a default judgment.
Learn more about court summons at https://brainly.com/question/14436531
#SPJ1
Which federal statute forbids a registered accounting firm from providing specific nonaudit services to an audit client?.
Answers
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT forbids a registered accounting firm from providing specific non-audit services to an audit client.
What is the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT?A federal law from the United States enacted in 2002 called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires firms to follow specific procedures for maintaining financial records and reporting. The rule was implemented in response to many significant business and accounting scandals, notably Enron and WorldCom. The bill's provisions address the duties of the board of directors of public corporations, impose criminal penalties for specific types of wrongdoing, and call on the Securities and Exchange Commission to establish regulations outlining public businesses' legal obligations. The Act's provisions, such as the wilful destruction of evidence to obstruct a government investigation, also apply to privately held businesses.
To know more about the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT visit:- https://brainly.com/question/27915345
#SPJ4
In January 2014, Professor Noe entered into a contract with State University. She agreed to teach full time during the 2014-2015 academic year. Professor Noe died on May 31, 2014. Her estate
a. is obligated to find another person who will agree to teach during the academic year.
b. will not be discharged. If the University has to pay more in order to hire a comparable substitute professor at the last minute, then the estate will be responsible for the difference in pay.
c. will be discharged from any obligations under the contract only if it can be shown that her death was unexpected.
d. is discharged from any further obligations under the contract.
Answers
Her estate is discharged from any further obligations under the contract. The correct option is d.
Professor Noe's estate would be released from all additional obligations under the agreement with State University upon her passing in May 2014. According to general law, a contracting party's obligations are terminated in the event of death.
The deceased person's estate is not required to secure a replacement or carry out the terms of the agreement on their behalf. Due to the unforeseeable circumstance of Professor Noe's passing, the agreement would be deemed frustrated and both parties would be released from their obligations.
Learn more about contract at:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
In Los Angeles, California, does the Retro Game Camp reopen?
Answers
Answer:
It is open!
Explanation:
according to its twitter, its open. Hours: Mon, Wed, Thur, Sat, Sun 12:00-7:00PM
Peremptory challenges:
Question 19 options:
are challenges for cause.
are generally limited in each case.
require specific reasons for use.
require proof of bias or prejudice of the juror.
none of the above
Answers
Peremptory challenges are a type of challenge used during the jury selection process. These challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without providing a specific reason or proof of bias or prejudice. So, None Of The Above option is appropriate.
Peremptory challenges are a separate category of challenges used during jury selection, distinct from challenges for cause. Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without providing a specific reason or proof of bias or prejudice. These challenges are typically limited in number in each case, although the specific limit can vary depending on the jurisdiction. While challenges for cause require a specific reason based on bias or prejudice of a juror, peremptory challenges provide attorneys with the opportunity to exercise discretion in selecting jurors they believe will be more favorable to their client's case, without needing to justify their decision with explicit reasons.
To know more about Peremptory challenges
brainly.com/question/32409799
#SPJ11
What is an arbitration decision called?
A. Judgment
B. Agreement
C. Award
D. Facilitator
Answers
Answer: C
Explanation:” This is like a judge's or jury's decision in a court case. Once the arbitrator decides that all of the parties' evidence and arguments have been presented, the arbitrator will close the hearings. Hope its right! Im pretty sure it is though
Objects that affected eachother. (Newtons law)
Answers
This is often worded as 'every action has an equal and opposite reaction'. However, it is important to remember that the two forces:
act on two different objects
are of the same type (eg both contact forces)
what is the laws requiring minors to have parental consent for abortion?
Answers
The laws requiring minors to have parental consent for abortion vary by jurisdiction. In some regions, there are laws in place that mandate parental consent or notification before a minor can obtain an abortion. These laws are designed to ensure that minors involve their parents or guardians in making such a significant decision. It is important to note that these laws and procedures can differ significantly depending on the jurisdiction.
The steps for these laws typically involve:
1. A minor seeking an abortion must first obtain written consent from at least one parent or legal guardian.
2. In some cases, there might be a waiting period between receiving consent and the abortion procedure.
3. If the minor cannot obtain parental consent or if they prefer not to involve their parents, they may pursue a judicial bypass. This process involves obtaining approval from a judge to proceed with the abortion without parental consent.
To learn more about "Laws" visit: https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ11
why structural functionalism a major perspective on deviance and crime
-sociology
Answers
Answer:i dont know really
Explanation:
Where is the majority of a city budget spending?
Answers
State and local governments spend most of their resources on education, health, and social service programs. In 2019, about one-third of state and local spending went toward combined elementary and secondary education (22%) and higher education (9%).
Why should a matriculant be aiming to achieve a bachelor's pass, regardless of what they plan for 2023 ?
Answers
The reason why a matriculant has to achieve a pass in their bachelor's regardless of the plans that they have in 2023 are:
To achieve fulfillment To be able to apply for jobs.What is a Bachelors?This is the degree that students who are able to fulfill all of the university requirements are awarded at the end of their school.
The person who is awarded this degree must be able to fulfill all of the school requirements by passing all of the required courses.
Read more on bachelors here:
https://brainly.com/question/17496239