Answer:
According to the King Center, the civil rights leader went to jail 29 times. He was arrested for acts of civil disobedience and on trumped-up charges, such as when he was jailed in Montgomery, Alabama, in 1956 for driving 30 miles per hour in a 25-mile-per-hour zone.
Mark as brainliest
Answer:
According to the King Center, the civil rights leader went to jail 29 times. He was arrested for acts of civil disobedience and on trumped-up charges, such as when he was jailed in Montgomery, Alabama, in 1956 for driving 30 miles per hour in a 25-mile-per-hour zone.
Explanation:
So he was arrested at least 29 times
Prior to the Texas Revolution, Spanish and Mexican leaders relied on ________________ to encourage to people to move to Texas.
Prior to the Texas Revolution, the commodity which the Spanish and Mexican leaders relied on land to encourage to people to move to Texas.
What was the Texas Revolution?This refers to the rebellion by the Texans against the Mexicans in 1835 so that they could get an independent Texas and be free from colonial rule.
With this in mind, we can see that the Mexican leaders gave the land agents about 335 acres of land for every family that was brought in to settle in Texas.
Read more about Texas Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/235330
how does melba show her faith in god
Answer:
As Melba travels through Central, she relies on several weapons to get the job done. The weapons she continuously uses are her faith in God, her words, and her courage. Beginning with her second day at Central, Melba is experiencing a great deal of hatred. "To keep my focus, I began saying the Lord's Prayer" (Beals 147). One girl spit on her, others walked on her heels, and a majority called her awful names.
identify and explain the early methods that were used to challenge segregation?
What led to King Philip's War? Local American Indians refused to obey English law. Narragansett Indians and colonists attacked a Pequot fort. Pequot Indians attacked an English trading post. Colonist settlement on Wampanoag land increased. Why did the Pilgrims and the Puritans establish colonies in the New World? to follow Separatist beliefs to benefit the Church of England to practice their religions freely to avoid an impending religious war
King Philip's War was the increased colonist settlement on Wampanoag land. The Pilgrims and the Puritans establish colonies in the New World to follow Separatist beliefs. The correct options are D and A respectively.
King Philip's War was primarily sparked by the growth of English colonists on Native American grounds, particularly on Wampanoag territory. The Wampanoag tribe and other tribes formed coalitions and fought the English colonists out of a desire to maintain their territory, sovereignty, and way of life.
The Pilgrims, a group of separatists from England, hoped to found a colony where they might freely practice their religion without the restrictions and persecution they experienced in England. They desired the right to practice their religion freely and to conduct their worship in accordance with their own interpretation of Christianity.
Thus, the ideal selections are options D and A respectively.
Learn more about King Philip's War here:
https://brainly.com/question/12119254
#SPJ4
Which act of Congress did Americans claim was most destructive of their civil rights and
liberties, such as freedom of speech and press?
A. the National Defense Act
B. the Selective Service Act
C. the Espionage and Sedition Acts
D. the National Security Act
Answer:
C
Explanation:
because it limtied for people to voice their opinions and it made people to go to war which is against their rights. By the way I just learned about it
How did monotheism set the Jews apart from others in the ancient world?
Which was a weakness of the Articles of Confederation?
A: The people had no say in who their representatives were.
B: The central government had no power to tax.
C: The central government had too much power over people's lives.
D: The state governments lost most of their powers.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Treated a lot people like slaves dude.
as alluded to in the grievances listed in the declaration of independence, the british practice of salutary neglect through much of the history of the thirteen colonies resulted in
The practice of salutary neglect by the British towards the thirteen colonies resulted in significant grievances, as reflected in the Declaration of Independence.
During the period of salutary neglect, which lasted from the late 17th century to the mid-18th century, the British government adopted a relatively relaxed approach to colonial rule. They focused less on enforcing strict control and regulations, allowing the colonies to develop a sense of self-government and enjoy relative autonomy. This period of neglect contributed to the growth of colonial self-identity and a sense of independence, as the colonists became accustomed to making their own decisions and managing their affairs.
However, the policy of salutary neglect also created a growing disconnect between the colonies and the British government. As the colonies became more accustomed to governing themselves, they developed their own institutions, trade networks, and economic systems. They grew accustomed to a certain degree of freedom in managing their affairs. When the British government attempted to reassert control and enforce stricter regulations through measures like the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act, it sparked resentment among the colonists. They felt that these actions violated the principles of self-government and individual rights that they had come to cherish. These grievances ultimately culminated in the American Revolution and the eventual separation of the thirteen colonies from British rule.
In summary, the practice of salutary neglect by the British towards the thirteen colonies resulted in a mixed outcome. On one hand, it allowed the colonies to develop a sense of self-governance and independence. On the other hand, it created a growing divide between the colonies and the British government, leading to grievances and ultimately contributing to the Revolutionary War and the quest for independence.
Learn more about independence here: brainly.com/question/27765350
#SPJ11
in what sense did the peloponnesian war represent a struggle between aristocratic and democratic societies? did the athenian generals deliberately lose the war, and why?
The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) represented a struggle between aristocratic and democratic societies in the sense that it was a conflict between two different political systems: Athens, a democratic city-state, and Sparta, an oligarchic and militaristic society.
Athens championed democratic ideals, promoting political participation and personal freedom, while Sparta's aristocratic system favored a small ruling elite and emphasized military discipline.
There is no concrete evidence that Athenian generals deliberately lost the war. The war consisted of numerous battles and complex strategies employed by both sides. The ultimate outcome was shaped by factors such as resources, leadership, alliances, and luck.
Athen's eventual defeat can be attributed to a combination of strategic mistakes, internal political strife, and the superior military capabilities of Sparta and its allies.
In conclusion, the Peloponnesian War was a struggle between two contrasting political ideologies and its outcome was not determined by any intentional actions to lose the war by Athenian generals, but rather by a variety of factors that led to Athens' defeat.
You can learn more about Peloponnesian War at: brainly.com/question/18552416
#SPJ11
1. Why did some Northerners feel like they needed General George McClellan to take command?
The correct answer is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Some Northerners felt like they needed General George McClellan to take command because they considered McClellan as an experienced man that had the support of his men.
However, in the end, General McClellan proved to be an incapable leader for the North for the following two reasons. McClellan was overly cautious as battles neared and he always believed he was outnumbered. These aspects infuriated President Abraham Lincoln and the US President decided to remove him.
General George McClellan could not decisively defeat the Confederate Army led by General Robert E.Lee during the famous Battle of Antietam, Maryland.
( I'll give a brainliest to whoever can answer all of them, and please hurry! ) What role did public opinion play in the actions of each of the following presidents and what impact did their actions have on the nation?
George Washington
Andrew Jackson
Abraham Lincoln
Theodore Roosevelt
Woodrow Wilson
Franklin Roosevelt
George Washington:
Public opinion played a significant role in the actions of George Washington, as he was the first president of the United States and had to establish the legitimacy of the new government. He was aware of the importance of public opinion in shaping the nation's political landscape and worked to build a positive image of the presidency. Washington's actions, such as his decision to retire after two terms, helped establish the precedent of a peaceful transfer of power and set the tone for future presidents.
Andrew jackson:
Public opinion played a significant role in the actions of Andrew Jackson, who was known for his populist approach to politics. He was a strong advocate for the common man and often appealed to the public's emotions to gain support for his policies. Jackson's actions, such as his veto of the Bank of the United States, were often controversial and polarizing, but he was able to maintain a strong base of support among the public.
Abraham Lincoln:
Public opinion played a crucial role in the actions of Abraham Lincoln, who was president during one of the most tumultuous periods in American history. Lincoln was a master at using public opinion to his advantage, and his speeches and actions were carefully crafted to appeal to the public's sense of morality and justice. Lincoln's decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation and his leadership during the Civil War helped shape the nation's future and cemented his place in history as one of America's greatest presidents.
Theodore Roosevelt:
Public opinion played a significant role in the actions of Theodore Roosevelt, who was known for his progressive policies and his willingness to challenge the status quo. Roosevelt was a master at using the media to shape public opinion, and his actions, such as his trust-busting efforts and his conservation policies, were often driven by a desire to appeal to the public's sense of fairness and justice. Roosevelt's actions had a significant impact on the nation, as he helped to break up monopolies and promote competition, which led to a more open and dynamic economy. He also helped to establish the United States as a major world power through his foreign policy initiatives.
Woodrow Wilson
Public opinion played a significant role in the actions of Woodrow Wilson, who was president during World War I. Wilson was a skilled orator and was able to use his speeches to rally public support for the war effort. Wilson's actions, such as his decision to enter the war and his leadership of the peace negotiations, helped shape the nation's role in the world and set the stage for future international relations. However, Wilson's actions also had negative consequences, such as the harsh terms imposed on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles, which contributed to the rise of Nazi Germany and the outbreak of World War II.
Franklin Roosevelt
Public opinion played a crucial role in the actions of Franklin Roosevelt, who was president during the Great Depression and World War II. Roosevelt was a master at using the media to shape public opinion, and his actions, such as his New Deal policies and his leadership during the war, were often driven by a desire to appeal to the public's sense of fairness and justice. Roosevelt's actions had a significant impact on the nation, as he helped to lift the country out of the Great Depression and led the nation to victory in World War II. His New Deal policies also helped to establish a social safety net and promote economic growth, which had a lasting impact on American society.
the best example of a mass-produced consumer product in the early 1900s was ________.
The best example of a mass-produced consumer product in the early 1900s was the Model T automobile. Introduced by Ford in 1908, the Model T quickly became popular among Americans due to its affordability and practicality.
Henry Ford's assembly line production method allowed for the mass production of the car, making it available to the middle class for the first time. The Model T was not only the first affordable car for the masses, but it also transformed the way goods were produced in factories. By using standardized, interchangeable parts, the production process became more efficient, making it possible to produce the car at a lower cost. The Model T was a significant milestone in the history of manufacturing and paved the way for the mass production of other consumer goods in the future.
to know more about mass-produced consumer product visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29619295
#SPJ11
What was the significance of the election of 1800?.
Answer:
If John Adams had won the election, then probably the southern federalists would have risen to power and many changes would occur. The election of 1800 also elected Thomas Jefferson, who reduced the nation's debt signed the treaty of Tripoli, and was in charge of the Louisiana Purchase. It was the 4th election in American History, as well.
which region has an abundance of coal, oil and gas
The regions of the world that has an abundance of coal, oil and gas are:
United StatesIran RussiaSaudi ArabiaWhat are natural resources?These are the natural resources that are in the surface of the earth which the countries use for economic purposes.
All of the resources mentioned above are fuel. They are used to power machineries for day to day living.
Read more on natural resources here: https://brainly.com/question/24514288
in the battle of bunker hill, group of answer choices the british suffered heavy casualties. the patriots refused to withdraw and were all killed. benedict arnold was wounded. the patriots suffered light casualties and won the battle. the british surrendered their main forces to the patriots.
The British intended to take control of Boston Harbor by deploying men from the city fortify the uninhabited hills that surrounded it. 1,200 colonial soldiers led by William Prescott in reaction took over Bunker Hill.
Although the majority of the fighting took occurred on the nearby hill, which later came to be known as Breed's Hill, it was the initial goal of both the colonial and British troops. On June 17, 1775, the Battle of Bunker Hill took place during the Siege of Boston, the first phase of the American Revolutionary War. The conflict was fought on Bunker Hill in Charlestown, Massachusetts, which had a minor role in it. On Breed's Hill, the colonists built a sturdy redoubt during the night. This redoubt was visible during the ensuing British campaign in New York and New Jersey , and it is debatable whether it helped or hurt the American forces because their new strategy gave them more time to flee if they were about to be defeated. The expensive engagement also persuaded the British that they needed to recruit a significant number of Hessian auxiliary troops to increase their fighting capacity in the face of the new and powerful.
Learn more about Bunker Hill here:
brainly.com/question/11462827
#SPJ4
Which event caused ranchers in texas to begin driving their cattle to california? question 2 options:
a. the gold rush
b. the civil war
c. the opening of the transcontinental railroad
e. the mexican-american war
a. gold rush event caused ranchers in texas to begin driving their cattle to california.
The first cattle drives went from Texas to San Francisco in an area where gold prospectors could be found (1849). Ranchers could sell their cattle for 5 to 20 times as much as in Texas. California's cattle market declined with gold mining.
Beef sprouts were profitable for Texas farmers when the beef industry was booming in the late 19th century. Some scholars even call 1880 “deal beef”. In fact, between 1866 and 1884, Texas ranchers more than five million cattle to slaughterhouses in the Northeast.
To know more about ranches in texas:
https://brainly.com/question/3675413
How does the Manifesto's legal interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment differ from the Court's? To what extent does it invoke nonlegal factors?
The Manifesto's legal interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment differs from the Court's by emphasizing broader protections for civil rights and invoking nonlegal factors such as social and moral considerations.
The Manifesto's legal interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment diverges from the Court's approach by taking a broader view of civil rights protections. While the Court's interpretation has focused primarily on the text and original intent of the amendment, the Manifesto incorporates additional factors, including social and moral considerations.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, guarantees equal protection of the laws and due process to all citizens. The Court has traditionally interpreted the amendment through a narrow legal lens, primarily examining the text, historical context, and original intent as expressed by the framers. This approach aims to adhere closely to the literal meaning of the Constitution.
In contrast, the Manifesto presents a more expansive understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment, drawing on nonlegal factors. It considers societal and moral principles, acknowledging that constitutional interpretation should evolve to address changing social circumstances and promote justice and equality. The Manifesto may invoke contemporary values, public opinion, and evolving standards of decency to interpret the amendment's scope and implications.
By incorporating nonlegal factors, the Manifesto advocates for a dynamic interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, adapting its application to modern challenges and expanding civil rights protections. This approach recognizes that legal interpretation cannot exist in isolation from broader societal considerations and the evolving norms of a democratic society.
Overall, the Manifesto's legal interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment differs from the Court's by emphasizing a more inclusive and contextual approach, invoking nonlegal factors such as social and moral considerations. It seeks to ensure that the constitutional protections guaranteed by the amendment are responsive to the changing needs and values of society.
Learn more about justice here:
https://brainly.com/question/14830074
#SPJ11
How did southern state legislatures attempt to restrict the rights of formerly enslaved persons after the civil war?.
Southern state legislatures attempted to restrict the rights of formerly enslaved person by passing the Black Codes.
The Legislature. The legislative department of government is answerable for making laws inside a country. Legislatures are made from human beings known as legislators who, in democracies, are elected by the united states of america's population.
A legislature is an assembly with the authority to make legal guidelines for a political entity inclusive of a rustic or town. they're often contrasted with the government and judicial powers of presidency. legal guidelines enacted by legislatures are usually known as number one rules.
The legislative department is in rate of making laws. it's far made from the Congress and several government businesses. Congress has elements: the house of Representatives and the Senate. participants of the house of Representatives and the Senate are voted into workplace by way of American residents in every state.
Learn more about legislatures here : https://brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
Venezuela is a(n) _________, as its economy and government are dependent on oil exports.
bauxite
petrostate
quatro
OPEC country
What did mary i of england, philip ii or spain, and oliver cromwell all have in common? they were all protestants. they were all considered politiques.
What Mary I of England, Phillip II of Spain, and Oliver Cromwell have in common is that the three of them were politiques.
Mary I of England was a catholic English queen, who ruled after Edward VI. She briefly restored Catholicism in England after Henry VIII turn to Anglicanism. She was married to her nephew Phillip II of Spain from 1554 till her death in 1558.
Phillip II of Spain ruled the Spanish domains from 1556 to 1598. He was a powerful ruler with a great influence on European diplomacy during the second half of the 16th century and a great defender of the Catholic Church. He fought against protestants, Anglicans, and Ottomans. He became also king of Portugal in 1580. Since then, his empire was known as " the empire where the sun never sets".
Oliver Cromwell was the founder of the first English Republic, known as the Commonwealth (1649-1660). It was set after the execution of King Charles I.
You can learn more about Mary I of England, Phillip II of Spain, and Oliver Cromwell in the links Bellow:
https://brainly.com/question/1280004
https://brainly.com/question/11418156
https://brainly.com/question/1316029
#SPJ4
According to the Declaration of Independence when are the people allowed to alter or ambolish the government ?
Answer:
When the government abuses their power.
Explanation:
As the Declaration says, “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.” The Declaration of Independence says that the purpose of government is to preserve people’s natural rights.
what is India formal (Region) ?
Answer: South Asia
Maybe it is correct.
How does the concept of equity relate to the history of the Industrial Revolution, capitalism, and socialism?
what is the stamp act
Answer:
the stamp act of 1765 was enacted by the British Parliament that taxed all legal documents including commercial contracts, newspapers, wills, marriage licenses, diplomas, pamphlets, and playing cards within the American colonies.
Explanation:
which of the following was a factor in the postwar suburban boom?
A.) government-backed integration efforts
B.) the rise of the two-income family
C.) affordable, Levitt-style houses
D.) an increase in the rural population
Affordable, Levitt-style houses were a factor in the postwar suburban boom, hence option C is correct.
American city suburbs experienced significant growth during the postwar suburban boom. The rise of the two-income family, the supply of affordable housing, and the creation of new transportation infrastructure were some of the factors that contributed to this boom.
In the postwar suburbs, a great deal of mass-produced, inexpensive homes were constructed in the Levitt style. As more individuals could now afford to acquire a home in the suburbs, these homes played a significant role in the suburban boom.
Learn more about postwar suburban boom, here:
https://brainly.com/question/33441552
#SPJ4
What was the impact of First World war?
Answer:
The First World War destroyed empires, created numerous new nation-states, encouraged independence movements in Europe's colonies, forced the United States to become a world power and led directly to Soviet communism and the rise of Hitler.
Explanation:
Hope it's helpful to you
QUESTION 3: APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA-1940s TO 1960s KEY QUESTION: HOW DID THE APARTHEID LAWS VIOLATE THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF PEOPLE IN SOUTH AFRICA? SOURCE A This source deals with some of the reasons for the implementation of Apartheid and was taken from History of Southern Africa by K. Shillington. In the words of one of the architects of apartheid, H.F. Verwoerd, Minister of Bantu Administration, and later Prime Minister (1958-66) there was no place for blacks in the European community above the level of labourer. To offer blacks the same education as whites, he argued, would mislead them by showing them the green pastures of European society which they were not allowed to graze. The apartheid laws were not only the racist views of Afrikaner nationalists, but some of them also had specific advantages for capitalist employers who paid blacks low wages and made huge profits. Blacks, who formed the bulk of the working class, were kept in a subordinate position with laws such as the Industrial Reconciliation Act, Mine and Workers Act and the Civilised Labour Policy. The National Party was returned to office with greatly increased majorities in the general elections of the 1950s and 1960s. SOURCE $By use your own knowledge and explain some of the laws as mentioned in the source that kept blacks in subordinate position in the work place
The Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa by assault and torture in police custody, detention without charge or trial, and restriction orders.
The Apartheid laws affected the people of South Africa where the pass laws and Apartheid policies prohibited the Black people there from entering urban areas without immediately finding a job. However, it was illegal for a Black person not to carry a passbook.
Black people could not even marry white people. Also, in South Africa they could not even set up businesses in white areas. So, this way the Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa.
Hence, Apartheid was a system of segregation and discrimination.
To learn more about the Apartheid laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/3860599
#SPJ1
2.Which colony is not a part of the New England colonies
Virginia
Massachusetts
Connecticut
Rhode Islaand
Answer:
Virginia
Explanation:
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
questions
Online Content: Site 1
List two differences between state senators and state representatives. (Site 1)
X
.
x x
BI U S
1
2
九
I
Answer:
Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts. The number of districts in each state is determined by a state's population. Each state has a minimum of one representative in Congress.
what modern day cities were under the spanish rule
Cuba and Puerto Rico were the only two American possessions that Spain retained authority over.
Additionally, it retained the Philippines and a few Oceanian islands, such as the Caroline Islands (including the Palau Islands) and the Marianas, that were still uninhabited (including Guam).
However, Spain lost nearly all of these last lands when it was defeated in the Spanish-American War of 1898.Only a few minor islands in Oceania remained under Spanish sovereignty (not including Guam). In 1899, Spain sold these islands to Germany.
Spain still maintained possessions in Africa.Until their independence in the 1960s and 1970s, Spain ruled over Morocco, Western Sahara, and Equatorial Guinea.
Western Sahara became the last colony to achieve independence in 1975.
Learn more about Spanish rule:
https://brainly.com/question/28536364
#SPJ1