how do you pass algebra class

Answer:

1 1/10

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2 + 3/5

1/2 = 5/10

3/5 = 6/10

6/10 + 5/10 =

1 1/10

Answer:

96

Step-by-step explanation:

.

Given,Three possible risk scenarios X, Y and Z. The initial assessment found that X is twice as likely as Z and Y is three times as likely as Z.

Probability of X is p(X) = 2p(Z)
Probability of Y is p(Y) = 3p(Z)
Probability of Z is p(Z)Let the probability of Z be p. So, the probability of X and Y can be written as:
p(X) = 2p(Z)p(Y) = 3p(Z). And, Total probability, p(X) + p(Y) + p(Z) = 1. Given that, p(X) + p(Y) + p(Z) = 12p(Z) + 3p(Z) + p(Z) = 1(6p(Z) = 1)p(Z) = 1/6. Therefore, p(X) = 2p(Z) = 2(1/6) = 1/3p(Y) = 3p(Z) = 3(1/6) = 1/2. Hence, the probability of X, Y, and Z are p(X) = 1/3, p(Y) = 1/2, and p(Z) = 1/6 respectively.

To know more about Probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:

Abrasion

Step-by-step explanation:

Abrasion is the process of scraping or wearing away something. If weathering has worn away the letters, it has been abrasion weathering.      

The volume of the right circular cone hat has a height of 19 feet and base diameter of 178 is calculated as: 1,575.2 ft³.

To find the volume of a right circular cone, we can use the formula:

V = (1/3) * π * r² * h

Where V is the volume, π is approximately 3.14, r is the radius of the base, and h is the height of the cone.

Given that the diameter of the base is 17.8 feet, we can divide it by 2 to find the radius, which is 8.9 feet.

Substituting these values into the formula:

V = (1/3) * π * (8.9²) * 19

V = (1/3) * 3.14 * 78.41 * 19

V = 1,575.2 ft^3

Rounded to the nearest tenth, the volume of the cone is 1,575.2 ft³

Learn more about the volume of cone on:

https://brainly.com/question/13677400

#SPJ1

7236 is NOT divisible by 10

Step-by-step explanation:

any number that ends with zero is divisible by 10 but 7236 dosent end with zero so 7236 isnt divisible by 10

Answer:

y = x + 8

Step-by-step explanation:

It is y = 1/1x + 8, but we don't put the one if it's at the botton. So, y = 1x + 8, but, when a one is in front of the x, we don't put it either. The answer is

y = x + 8

The y-intercept is where the line "touches" the y-intercept, in this case, 8.

The slope is how many times you go up-down, and to side from point to pint, in this case 1/1.

Makes sense? If so, hope this helps!

Answer:

y = -1x + 8 or y = -x + 8 (both are same)

Step-by-step explanation:

m = slope

slope = y2 - y1 / x2 - x1

4 - 6 / 4 - 2 = -2/2 = -1

m = -1  

b = y-intercept

b = 8

y = mx + b

y = -1x + 8

y = -x + 8

(negative slope)

Answer:

400 square inches

Step-by-step explanation:

surface area= summation of area of all the faces the object has

out object has 2 triangular faces, and 3 rectangular faces

S.A = 2(0.5bh) + LW +LW+LW

= 2(0.5 x 8 x 15) + (15x7) + (17 x 7) + (7×8)

= 120+105+119+56

= 400 square inches

Answer:

d. 200%

Step-by-step explanation:

( 800 ÷ 400 ) × 100

the set of functions from {0,1} to natural numbers is countably infinite.

What is a sequence?

A sequence is an enumerated collection of objects in which repetitions are allowed. Like a set, it contains members (also called elements, or terms).

To show that the set of functions from {0,1} to natural numbers is countably infinite, we can establish a one-to-one correspondence between this set and the set of natural numbers.

Consider a function f from {0,1} to natural numbers. Since there are only two possible inputs in the domain, 0 and 1, we can represent the function f as a sequence of natural numbers. For example, if f(0) = 3 and f(1) = 5, we can represent the function as the sequence (3, 5).

Now, let's define a mapping from the set of functions to the set of natural numbers. We can do this by representing each function as a sequence of natural numbers and then converting the sequence to a unique natural number.

To convert a sequence of natural numbers to a unique natural number, we can use a pairing function, such as the Cantor pairing function. This function takes two natural numbers as inputs and maps them to a unique natural number. By applying the pairing function to each element of the sequence, we can obtain a unique natural number that represents the function.

Since the set of natural numbers is countably infinite, and we have established a one-to-one correspondence between the set of functions from {0,1} to natural numbers and the set of natural numbers, we can conclude that the set of functions from {0,1} to natural numbers is also countably infinite.

This result is opposite to the characterization of power sets, where the power set of a set with n elements has 2^n elements, which is uncountably infinite for non-empty sets.

Therefore, the set of functions from {0,1} to natural numbers is countably infinite.

To know more about sequence visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12246947

#SPJ4

The bacterial count after 48 hours decreases. A correlation coefficient of 0 would indicate no relationship between the two variables.

To find the correlation between the bacterial count after 24 hours and 48 hours, we would need the actual numerical values of the bacterial counts for each strain. Without that information, we cannot calculate the correlation coefficient. However, it is important to note that a positive correlation would indicate that as the bacterial count after 24 hours increases, the bacterial count after 48 hours also increases. A negative correlation would indicate that as the bacterial count after 24 hours increases, the bacterial count after 48 hours decreases. A correlation coefficient of 0 would indicate no relationship between the two variables.

The complete question is-

Five strains of the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria were grown for 24 hours either at 35 degrees Celsius or at 43 degrees Celsius. Here are the resulting bacterial counts for each condition:

24 hr: 66, 71, 93, 102, 62

48hr: 110,123,146,136,113

If we had plotted bacterial count at 35 degrees Celsius on the y-axis instead of the x-axis, the value of the correlation coefficient would be

learn more  about correlation coefficient

https://brainly.com/question/15577278

#SPJ11

The first step in hypothetical-deductive reasoning is to formulate a hypothesis. A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction based on observations and previous knowledge. It is a statement that can be tested and possibly falsified through further observations and experiments. Once a hypothesis is formulated, the next step is to design an experiment or observation to test it. This involves identifying variables that can be manipulated or measured and determining the methods for manipulating or measuring them. After the experiment or observation is conducted, the data are analyzed and conclusions are drawn based on the results. The conclusions may confirm or reject the hypothesis, leading to further refinement of the hypothesis or the development of a new hypothesis.

The first step in hypothetical-deductive reasoning is the formulation of a hypothesis.

Hypothetical-deductive reasoning starts with the formulation of a hypothesis, which serves as a tentative explanation or prediction for a given phenomenon or problem. In this process, an individual or researcher uses their knowledge, observations, and previous information to generate a possible solution or explanation.

The formulation of a hypothesis involves considering the available evidence, conducting research, and analyzing the existing data. It requires critical thinking and creativity to develop a logical and testable statement that can be further investigated. The hypothesis should be specific, clear, and based on logical reasoning.

Once a hypothesis is formulated, it serves as a starting point for the deductive phase of reasoning. Deductive reasoning involves making specific predictions or deriving logical consequences based on the hypothesis. These predictions can then be tested through empirical research or experiments to evaluate the validity of the hypothesis and gather further evidence.

Overall, the first step in hypothetical-deductive reasoning is the formulation of a hypothesis, providing a framework for subsequent investigation and the generation of testable predictions.

To know more about Hypothetical-deductive reasoning refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/7997889

#SPJ11

Interactions involving dummy variables can provide insights into the different effects of independent variables across categories.

1. Dummy variables are binary variables that represent categorical variables in a regression analysis. When interactions are included between dummy variables and other independent variables, it allows for differential effects of the independent variables based on the different levels of the categorical variable.

For example, let's consider a regression model to predict income based on education level and gender. We can include an interaction term between education level (represented by dummy variables for different levels) and gender. This interaction term allows us to examine whether the effect of education level on income differs between males and females. It helps capture any gender-specific differences in the relationship between education and income.

1.2 The linear probability model (LPM) is a common approach to estimate the probability of an event occurring using a linear regression framework. However, it has several problems:

1. The predicted probabilities from the LPM can fall outside the [0, 1] range: Since the LPM does not impose any restrictions on the predicted probabilities, they can sometimes exceed the valid probability range. This violates the assumption of probabilities being bounded between 0 and 1.

2. Heteroscedasticity: The LPM assumes constant error variance across the range of the predictors. However, in practice, the variability of the error term may change with different levels of the predictors, resulting in heteroscedasticity. This violates the assumption of homoscedasticity.

3. Non-linearity: The LPM assumes a linear relationship between the predictors and the probability of the event. However, this may not always be the case, and using a linear model can result in misspecification.

To remedy these problems, an alternative to the LPM is to use logistic regression or probit regression models. These models explicitly model the probability of an event occurring and address the issues mentioned above. They provide predicted probabilities that fall within the valid range of 0 to 1, account for heteroscedasticity, and allow for non-linear relationships between the predictors and the probability of the event.

Learn more about LPM here:

https://brainly.com/question/30890632

#SPJ4

T A can be seen as a linear transformation from R^2 to R^3.

To find the range and codomain of the matrix transformation T A, we need to first determine the matrix T A . The matrix T A is obtained by multiplying the input vector x by A:

T A (x) = A x

Therefore, T A can be seen as a linear transformation from R^2 to R^3.

To determine the range of T A , we need to find all possible outputs of T A (x) for all possible inputs x. Since T A is a linear transformation, its range is simply the span of the columns of A. Therefore, we can find the range by computing the reduced row echelon form of A and finding the pivot columns:

A =  (\left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 2 \ 1 & -2 \ 0 & 1\end{array}\right]) ~ (\left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 0 \ 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0\end{array}\right])

The pivot columns are the first two columns of the identity matrix, so the range of T A is spanned by the first two columns of A. Therefore, the range of T A is the plane in R^3 spanned by the vectors [1, 1, 0] and [2, -2, 1].

To find the codomain of T A , we need to determine the dimension of the space that T A maps to. Since T A is a linear transformation from R^2 to R^3, its codomain is R^3.

If the functions were not linear, it would not make sense to talk about their range or codomain in this way. The concepts of range and codomain are meaningful only for linear transformations.

Learn more about  linear  from

https://brainly.com/question/2030026

#SPJ11

Answer:

c. C Both a and b can be solved using this inequality

Let's use the method of separation of variables, which assumes that the solution to the problem can be represented as a product of two functions: u(x,y) = X(x)Y(y).

Now, we'll substitute the above expression into the given PDE, then it yields:

We divide both sides by X(x)Y(y)Uxx / X(x) + Uyy / Y(y)

= 0 X(x) Y(y)

= Uxx / X(x) + Uyy / Y(y)X(x) Uxx / X(x) + Y(y) Uyy / Y(y)

= 0 (1/X(x)) Uxx + (1/Y(y)) Uyy = 0.

The above equation can be divided into two separate equations: (1/X(x)) Uxx = k1 (2) (1/Y(y))

Uyy = -k1 (3)

where k1 is a separation constant.

Now we solve each of them separately:

Solution of (1/X(x)) Uxx = k1

where k1 is a separation constant.

We have the following general solution for this equation:

U(x) = Acos(x√(k1)) + Bsin(x√(k1)).

Solution of (1/Y(y))

Uyy = -k1

We have the following general solution for this equation:

V(y) = Ccos(y√(-k1)) + Dsin(y√(-k1)).

Since we have the boundary conditions given:

u(0,y) = 0

= u (π,y)

= 0u (x,0)

= 0, u(x,π)

= g(x)

We'll have:

u(0,y) = X(0)Y(y)

= 0 (4)u(π,y)

= X(π)Y(y)

= 0 (5)u(x,0)

= X(x)Y(0)

= 0 (6)u(x,π)

= X(x)Y(π)

= g(x) (7)

If Y(y) ≠ 0 (and similarly for X(x)), then (4) and (5) imply that X(0)

= X(π)

= 0.

If X(x) ≠ 0 (and similarly for Y(y)), then (6) implies that Y(0) = 0.

The solution of the PDE is given by

u(x,y) = Σ[(A_n cos (nπx / L) + B_n sin(nπx / L)) (C_n cosh (nπy / L) + D_n sinh (nπy / L))]

where L = π, and g(x) can be expressed as a Fourier series: g(x) = ΣG_n sin(nπx / L).

Then we have: u(x,y) = Σ(G_n / nπ)sin(nπx / L) sinh (nπy / L).

To know more on Fourier series visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30763814

#SPJ11

The theoretical probability for the 1 horned, 1 eyed,  flying, people eater purple is found to be 1/120.

Experimental Probability: Based on actual results rather than mathematical calculations, the experimental probability of an occurrence is the likelihood that the event will actually occur.

Theoretical Probability: Considering that the event is ideal, the theoretical chance that it will occur is the theoretically ideal probability of a specific result. The flaws in the system are not taken into consideration by theoretical probability.

Theoretical Probability = Number of favorable outcomes / Number of possible outcomes.

The given probability are;

Let P(E)  be the theoretical probability  1 horned, 1 eyed,  flying, people eater purple.

Then,

P(E) =  3/4 * 1/5* 2/3* 3/8* 1/2

P(E) =  1/120

Know more about the theoretical probability

https://brainly.com/question/1503266

#SPJ1

A type II error is a statistical term used to describe the failure to reject a false null hypothesis. It occurs when the null hypothesis is actually false but is not rejected because the statistical test failed to find significant evidence against it.

In other words, it happens when an alternative hypothesis is true, but we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Types of errors in hypothesis testing

There are two types of errors in hypothesis testing:

Type I error: Rejecting a true null hypothesis

Type II error: Failing to reject a false null hypothesis.Type I error occurs when a true null hypothesis is rejected while Type II error occurs when a false null hypothesis is not rejected. These types of errors are inversely related, meaning that a decrease in one type of error causes an increase in the other.

You can learn more about type II errors at: brainly.com/question/30403884

#SPJ11

Answer:

t = 0.5m + 15

Step-by-step explanation:

0.5m + 15 = t

The missing factor in the second equation is 1, and the completed equation is: -24y + (-5) = -4(6y + 5/4)

We know that the GCF of -24y and -20 is 4. To find the missing factor in each equation, we can divide both terms by the GCF of 4.

For the first equation, we have:

-24y = 4 * (-6y)

Dividing both sides by 4, we get:

-6y = -24/4

Simplifying, we get:

-6y = -6

Therefore, the missing factor in the first equation is -1, and the completed equation is:

-24y + 20 = -4(6y - 5)

For the second equation, we have:

-20 = 4 * (-5)

Dividing both sides by 4, we get:

-5 = -20/4

Simplifying, we get:

-5 = -5/1

Therefore, the missing factor in the second equation is 1, and the completed equation is:

-24y + (-5) = -4(6y + 5/4)

Learn more about GCF at https://brainly.com/question/219464

#SPJ1

Answer:

B)4

C)-20

D)-4

the answer is D -4

Step-by-step explanation:

you plug f(x) into 4x. y=4(2)-12 have a good day :)

Answer:

p=18_18

p=0

check

0+18=18

The correct null and alternative hypotheses for this question. The null hypothesis is always the opposite of the alternative hypothesis.

H0: μ ≥ 3 (the mean forecast GDP of all economists is greater than or equal to 3%)
HA: μ < 3 (the mean forecast GDP of all economists is less than 3%)
This is because the question asks if the mean forecast GDP is less than 3%, which is the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is always the opposite of the alternative hypothesis.

Based on the average predictions of 45 economists, the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) will expand by 2.7% this year, and the sample standard deviation is 1%. To test if the mean forecast GDP of all economists is less than 3% at a 10% significance level, follow these steps:

1. Identify the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (HA). In this case, the null hypothesis is that the mean GDP growth is equal to or greater than 3%, while the alternative hypothesis is that the mean GDP growth is less than 3%. So, the correct choice is:
  H0: μ ≥ 3; HA: μ < 3 (Option c)
2. Calculate the t-test statistic:
  t = (sample mean - hypothesized mean) / (sample standard deviation / √n)
  t = (2.7 - 3) / (1 / √45)
  t = -0.3 / 0.149
  t ≈ -2.01
3. Determine the critical t-value at the 10% significance level using a t-table. With 44 degrees of freedom (n-1), the critical t-value for a one-tailed test at the 10% significance level is approximately -1.30.
4. Compare the t-test statistic with the critical t-value:
  Since -2.01 < -1.30, the t-test statistic falls in the rejection region.
5. Conclusion:
  Reject the null hypothesis (H0: μ ≥ 3) and accept the alternative hypothesis (HA: μ < 3). There is sufficient evidence at the 10% significance level to conclude that the mean forecast GDP of all economists is less than 3%.
Your answer: Option c. H0: μ ≥ 3; HA: μ < 3

Visit here to learn more about GDP growth:

brainly.com/question/14869472

#SPJ11

Answer:

144 in3

Step-by-step explanation:

length×height×width

6×6×8= 144

Initial velocity of  ball is 13 m/s. The acceleration due to gravity is approximately 10 m/s². After 2 seconds, the height of the ball above the ground can be determined using the kinematic equation.

When a ball is thrown upward, its initial velocity is positive (+13 m/s), and the acceleration due to gravity is negative (-10 m/s²) since it acts in the opposite direction of the ball's motion. To find the height of the ball after 2 seconds, we can use the kinematic equation:

y = y₀ + v₀t + (1/2)at²,

where y represents the height, y₀ is the initial position (ground level), v₀ is the initial velocity, t is the time, and a is the acceleration.

Plugging in the values, we have:

y = 0 + (13 m/s)(2 s) + (1/2)(-10 m/s²)(2 s)²,

y = 0 + 26 m + (-10 m/s²)(4 s²),

y = 0 + 26 m - 40 m,

y = -14 m.

The negative sign indicates that the ball is below the ground level. However, since we are interested in the height above the ground, we take the absolute value:

|y| = |-14 m| = 14 m.

Therefore, 2 seconds after the ball is thrown, it is 14 meters above the ground.

Learn more about negative here

brainly.com/question/14719138

#SPJ11

Answer:

See explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Usually, I just find the quadratic formula the easiest to go, but here are some tips to tell if which you should use.

1. First see if you can get integer values for the roots to multiply to c and add to b.

This is the easiest way to solve a quadratic equation, and I always check for whether I can easily find the roots by multiply two numbers for c and adding them for b.

For instance, the Quadratic \(x^2 + 5x + 6\)

I can easily see that 2 and 3 are the roots here - as \(2\cdot3=6\) and \(2+3=5\). If you can do this and receive integer values, then great! I'd definitely stick with this.

2. See if you can complete the square

If you have a quadratic which is a perfect square, you'll be able to tell if c is a perfect square, and b is twice that number. This will be easiest. Any quadratic equation can be solved by completing the square, but I personally stick to this method only if I can tell it's a perfect square quadratic.

3. Stick to the Quadratic Formula

If all else fails, go with the Quadratic formula. It's not that hard and it gets the job done. I would highly discourage going with graphing, as it takes too much time and it's quite a hassle unless you have a graphing calculator.

I really hope this helped!

Answer:

In my preferred order, ...

Step-by-step explanation:

My personal favorite is to use a graphing calculator. If it shows the zeros are whole numbers, your solution is at hand. If it shows the zeros are recognizable decimal fractions*, the solution is also at hand. If it shows the zeros are unrecognizable as fractions, they are likely irrational. Then the vertex of the graph gets you most of the way to an exact solution.

If the quadratic's coefficients are not integers, then the quadratic formula is least likely to give difficulty.

Example

The attached is a graph of the quadratic ...

  y = 2x^2 -3x -4

We can see from the x-intercepts that the roots are irrational (none are fractions with a denominator that is a factor of 2). The vertex of the graph is (3/4, -5 1/8), so the vertex form of the equation for this graph is ...

  y = 2(x -3/4)^2 -(5 1/8)

Solving this for y=0, we find ...

  0 = 2(x -3/4)^2 -(5 1/8)

  5 1/8 = 2(x -3/4)^2 . . . . . .add the constant (vertex y-value)

  (5 1/8)/2 = (x -3/4)^2 . . . . divide by 2 (the leading coefficient)

  2 9/16 = (x -3/4)^2

  x = 3/4 ± √(41/16) . . . . . . . add the horizontal offset (vertex x-value)

  x = (3 ± √41)/4 . . . . . . . . . . simplify

If you see what we've done here, you can write down the answer from the vertex and the leading coefficient:

  x = (3/4) ± √((5 1/8)/2) . . . . . vertex (3/4, 5 1/8), leading coefficient 2

__

With a little practice, factoring can be a relatively simple way to find the solution. As a preliminary step, the equation should be divided by any common factor of the coefficients, so they are all relatively prime. It helps immensely to know your times tables thoroughly. I like this method, because it can get a solution with fewer steps than using the quadratic formula.

The product of two binomials is ...

  (ax +b)(cx +d) = acx^2 +(ad+bc)x +bd

The product of the leading coefficient (ac) and the constant (bd) is abcd. It has factors of ad and bc, whose sum is the coefficient of the linear term. So, if you can factor the product of the leading and trailing coefficients and find a sum of factors that is the middle coefficient, you're home free. Sometimes the factors jump out at you, and sometimes you need to list a bunch of them before you see what you need.

In our example, we would be looking for factors of 2(-4) = -8 that have a sum of -3.

  -8 = (-8)(1) = -4(2) = (-2)(4) = (-1)(8)

These pairs have sums of -7, -2, 2, 7. None of the sums is -3, so factoring by integers is not possible. You can see that it is unnecessary to list the pairs with positive sums in this case.

Once you have the values ad and bc, you can see that 'a' is the greatest common divisor of ac and ad. Then ad/a = d, and ac/a = c. Now you know 3 of the 4 numbers in the binomial factors.

_____

* The Rational Root Theorem can tell you what reasonable fractions might be for your quadratic. You should be familiar with the decimal equivalents of fractions with small integer denominators.

Answer:

should be y= 4x + 24 let me know if it was wrong