Help please
No or yes

Answer: 24

We can conclude that Maya's experimental probabilities fluctuate around the theoretical probability, but over a larger number of trials, the experimental probabilities should converge towards the theoretical probability.

What is probability?

Probability is simply how likely something is to happen. Whenever we're unsure about the outcome of an event, we can talk about the probabilities of certain outcomes—how likely they are. The analysis of events governed by probability is called statistics.

The theoretical probability of rolling a 5 on a fair die is 1/6, which means that if the die is rolled many times, we would expect to see a 5 about 1/6 of the time.

For the first 100 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 25 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 25/100

experimental probability = 0.25

So, in the first 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.25.

For the first 200 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 30 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 30/200

experimental probability = 0.15

So, in the first 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.15.

Comparing these experimental probabilities to the theoretical probability, we see that after 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.25) is higher than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 100 trials was somewhat biased in favor of rolling a 5.

On the other hand, after 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.15) is lower than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 200 trials was somewhat biased against rolling a 5.

Overall, we can conclude that Maya's experimental probabilities fluctuate around the theoretical probability, but over a larger number of trials, the experimental probabilities should converge towards the theoretical probability. This is known as the law of large numbers, which states that as the number of trials or observations increases, the experimental probability will tend to approach the theoretical probability.

Learn more about probability on:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

We might say that Maya's experimental probabilities oscillate about the theoretical probability, but after more trials, the experimental probabilities ought to converge to the theoretical probability.

What is probability?

Simply put, probability is the likelihood that something will occur. When we don't know how an event will turn out, we can discuss the likelihood or likelihood of several outcomes. Statistics is the study of events that follow a probability distribution.

A fair die has a theoretical probability of rolling a 5 of 1/6, therefore if the die is rolled several times, we can anticipate seeing a 5 roughly 1/6 of the time.

For the first 100 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 25 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 25/100

experimental probability = 0.25

So, in the first 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.25.

For the first 200 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 30 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 30/200

experimental probability = 0.15

So, in the first 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.15.

Comparing these experimental probabilities to the theoretical probability, we see that after 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.25) is higher than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 100 trials was somewhat biased in favor of rolling a 5.

On the other hand, after 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.15) is lower than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 200 trials was somewhat biased against rolling a 5.

Overall, we can conclude that Maya's experimental probabilities fluctuate around the theoretical probability, but over a larger number of trials, the experimental probabilities should converge towards the theoretical probability. This is known as the law of large numbers, which states that as the number of trials or observations increases, the experimental probability will tend to approach the theoretical probability.

Learn more about probability on:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

Answer:

If f(-5) = 7, then the point P(-5, 7) will be on the graph of f

where -5 is the x-coordinate and 7 is the y-coordinate

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2/10 ( not quite sure )

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it’s right

Any three lengths that satisfy the triangle inequality theorem can form the sides of a triangle. The theorem states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side.

In order for three lengths to form a triangle, they must satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side.

Let's consider three lengths: a, b, and c.

To determine if they can form a triangle, we need to check the following conditions:

a + b > c

a + c > b

b + c > a

If all three conditions are true, then the lengths a, b, and c can form a triangle.

For example, let's consider the lengths 3, 4, and 5.

3 + 4 > 5 (True)

3 + 5 > 4 (True)

4 + 5 > 3 (True)

Since all three conditions are true, the lengths 3, 4, and 5 can form a triangle.

Therefore, any three lengths that satisfy the triangle inequality theorem can be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.

For more such question on triangle inequality theorem

https://brainly.com/question/1163433

#SPJ8

The equation of the polynomial equation in standard form is P(x) = x⁴ + 6x² + 5

The given parameters are

Degree = 4

Zero = -i, 5i

There are complex numbers in the above zeros

This means that, the other zeros are

Zeros = -5i and i

The equation of the polynomial is then calculated as

P(x) = Leading coefficient * (x - zero)^multiplicity

So, we have

P(x) = 1 * (x - (-5i)) * (x + 5i) * (x - (-i)) * (x - i)

This gives

P(x) = 1 * (x² + 5) * (x² + 1)

Evaluate the products

P(x) = (x² + 5)(x² + 1)

Express in standard form

P(x) = x⁴ + x² + 5x² + 5

Evaluate the like terms

P(x) = x⁴ + 6x² + 5

Hence, the equation is P(x) = x⁴ + 6x² + 5

Read more about polynomial at

brainly.com/question/17517586

#SPJ1

Miranda has $130 of discretionary income per month after all her needs are met with the list above. The answer is option D.

To calculate Miranda's discretionary income, we need to first add up her expenses:

$60 + $85 + $195 + $55 + $575 = $970

Next, we need to calculate her monthly income.

Since Miranda gets paid semi-monthly, we'll need to multiply her paycheck amount by 24 (the number of pay periods in a year) and divide by 12 (the number of months in a year):

$550 x 24 / 12 = $1,100

Now we can calculate her discretionary income by subtracting her expenses from her income:

$1,100 - $970 = $130

Therefore, Miranda has $130 of discretionary income per month after all her needs are met with the list above. The answer is option D.

To learn more on Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

The length of side X in simple radical form with a rational denominator is 10/√3.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a 30-60-90 triangle is also referred to as a special right-angled triangle and it can be defined as a type of right-angled triangle whose angles are in the ratio 1:2:3 and the side lengths are in the ratio 1:√3:2.

This ultimately implies that, the length of the hypotenuse of a 30-60-90 triangle is double (twice) the length of the shorter leg (adjacent side), and the length of the longer leg (opposite side) of a 30-60-90 triangle is √3 times the length of the shorter leg (adjacent side):

Adjacent side = 5/√3

Hypotenuse, x = 2 × 5/√3

Hypotenuse, x = 10/√3.

Read more on 30-60-90 triangle here: brainly.com/question/30283450

#SPJ1

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

Answer:

b = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

4/6 is equivalent to 2/3, so with the slopes and y-intercepts being the same, there will be infinitely many solutions

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of unitary method comes out to be Daisy cream and Kremlin cream both have less cream per bulk 1 gallon and 4.5 gallons, respectively than Marble cream.

The objective can be accomplished by utilising what has already been discovered, taking advantage of this worldwide access, and including all essential components from earlier changeable study who employed a certain technique. If the anticipated claim outcome actually occurs, it will either be possible to contact the variable again or both important processes will undoubtedly miss the statement.

Here,

We must convert cups to gallons because daisy cream is sold in bulks of cups. Since a gallon of Daisy cream comprises 16 cups, one quantity of Daisy cream contains:

=> 16 cups per bulk = 1 gallon 16 cups per bulk = 1 gallon

Moscow cream is offered in bulk quantities of 4 1/2 gallons, which is one gallon.

Thus, we must convert pints to gallons. A gallon of Marble cream comprises eight pints, hence one quantity of Marble cream contains:

=> 40 pints in a bulk equal 1 gallon, 8 pints, or 5 gallons.

As a result, we can see that Marble cream, with 5 gallons per bulk, has the most cream.

Daisy cream and Kremlin cream both have less cream per bulk (1 gallon and 4.5 gallons, respectively) than Marble cream.

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

The increase was: 494

The missing number in Sequence 2 is 780.

To find the missing number in Sequence 2, let's analyze the pattern:

In Sequence 1, the numbers increase by 1 each time: 126, 127, 128, 129, ...

In Sequence 2, the numbers seem to follow a pattern where each number is obtained by multiplying the corresponding number in Sequence 1 by a certain factor:

2 x 126 = 252

3 x 127 = 381

4 x 128 = 512

5 x 129 = 645

...

Looking at this pattern, we can see that the missing number in Sequence 2 should be:

6 x 130 = 780

For similar question on Sequence.

https://brainly.com/question/7882626  

#SPJ8

Answer:

7.5 i think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  2.83°

Step-by-step explanation:

The tangent of an angle is the ratio of rise to run.

 θ = arctan(5/101) ≈ 2.83°

_____

We assume the length is referring to the horizontal distance.

If it is the distance along the path, then the angle is ...

  θ = arcsin(5/101) ≈ 2.84°

The equivalent expressions to \(24^{-7}\) are given as follows:

C. \(\left(\frac{1}{24^{-7}}\right)^{-1}\)

F. \((24^3 \times 24^4)^{-1}\)

Equivalent expressions are expressions that have the same value for all possible values of the variables. In other words, equivalent expressions are different ways of writing the same mathematical idea.

The exponent in the denominator can be moved to the numerator with the changed signal, hence:

\(\left(\frac{1}{24^{-7}}\right)^{-1} = (24^7)^{-1}\)

Applying the power of power rule, we multiply the powers, hence:

\((24^7)^{-1} = 24^{-7}\)

When two terms with the same base and different exponents are multiplied, we add the bases and keep the exponents, hence:

\((24^3 \times 24^4)^{-1} = (24^7)^{-1} = 24^{-7}\)

More can be learned about equivalent expressions at https://brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

Let's use the distributive property on the left-hand side to expand and then simplify the whole equation. The process is shown below:

As you can see, they are basically the same for both sides!

Hence, no matter what value(s) you put in for x, it will ALWAYS be true!

Thus, this equation has infinite many solutions.

Correct Answer:

Infinitely many solutions

The selling price of an equipment costing $150.00 with 35% markup is $202.50

An equation is an expression that shows the relationship between two numbers and variables.

An independent variable is a variable that does not depend on any other variable for its value whereas a dependent variable is a variable that depend on any other variable for its value.

Given that the mark up is 35%, hence:

Markup = [(selling price - cost price)/cost price] * 100%

Substituting:

$202.50

Selling price = $202.50

The selling price of an equipment costing $150.00 with 35% markup is $202.50

Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Answer:

-10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

- 10

Step-by-step explanation:

- √100

= - 10

( - 10 is a real number )

Answer:

No.

Step-by-step explanation:

First, note that there is no variable x inside the equation. Therefore, there is nothing for the -4 to plug into.

However, if you meant to put the same variable, it still will not work.

Plugging in -4 for z (if you meant z = -4), would give you the following:

Assuming that z = -4

-3(-4) + 10 = 5

-12 + 10 = 5

-2 ≠ 5.

Therefore, even if you did mean to put the same variable, it will still not be correct.

~

For the given equation, there is no variable x but z is a variable in the linear equation. Since x is not a variable of the equation, we can't put the value given.

But if we plug the value of -4 in place of z:

➝ -3(-4) + 10

➝ 12 + 10

➝ 22 which is not equals to 5.

Hence, this equation is not satisfying for the value of variable given that is 4. Thus, -4 is not a solution to the given equation\(.\)

Carry On Learning !

Answer:

i have a monument in st.louis named after me (josh peck)

name: gateway arch

Step-by-step explanation:

There are no solutions to the system of inequalities Option (d)

Inequalities are a fundamental concept in mathematics and are commonly used in solving problems that involve ranges of values.

A system of two inequalities is a set of two inequalities that are considered together. In this case, the system of inequalities is

y > 3x + 1

y < 3x - 3

The inequality y > 3x + 1 represents a line on the coordinate plane with a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of 1. The inequality y < 3x - 3 represents another line on the coordinate plane with a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of -3. We can draw these lines on the coordinate plane and shade the regions that satisfy each inequality.

The first line has a positive slope and goes through (negative 2, negative 5) and (0, 1). Everything to the left of the line is shaded. The second line has a positive slope and goes through (0, negative 3) and (1, 0). Everything to the right of the line is shaded.

We can start by analyzing the inequality y > 3x + 1. This inequality represents the region above the line with a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of 1. Therefore, any point that is above this line satisfies this inequality.

Next, we analyze the inequality y < 3x - 3. This inequality represents the region below the line with a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of -3. Therefore, any point that is below this line satisfies this inequality.

To determine which values satisfy both inequalities, we need to find the region that satisfies both inequalities. This region is the intersection of the regions that satisfy each inequality.

When we analyze the regions that satisfy each inequality, we see that there is no region that satisfies both inequalities. Therefore, there are no values that satisfy the system of inequalities shown.

There are no solutions to the system of inequalities y > 3x + 1 and y < 3x - 3 by analyzing the regions that satisfy each inequality on a coordinate plane. The lack of a solution is determined by the fact that there is no region that satisfies both inequalities.

To know more about Inequalities here

https://brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ1

Complete Question :

Which is true about the solution to the system of inequalities shown?

y > 3x + 1

y < 3x – 3

On a coordinate plane, 2 solid straight lines are shown. The first line has a positive slope and goes through (negative 2, negative 5) and (0, 1). Everything to the left of the line is shaded. The second line has a positive slope and goes through (0, negative 3) and (1, 0). Everything to the right of the line is shaded.

Options:

a)Only values that satisfy y > 3x + 1 are solutions.

b)Only values that satisfy y < 3x – 3 are solutions.

c)Values that satisfy either y > 3x + 1 or y < 3x – 3 are solutions.

d)There are no solutions.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than 1 of the 20 individuals is equal to:

P = 1 - P(1) - P(0)

Where:

P(1) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in one individual

P(0) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in 0 individuals.

The probability that the vaccine is effective is 0.95

Then the probability that the vaccine is not effective is 0.05.

Then to calculate P(1), suppose that the vaccine is not effective in the first case and then is effective 19 times, this is:

p(1) = (0.05^1)*(0.95^19)

But this only for one case, we have 20 possible permutations (the vaccine is not effective in the first case, the second case, third case, etc)

Then the actual probability is:

P(1) = 20*((0.05^1)*(0.95^19)) = 0.377

And P(0) is easy to compute:

P(0) = (0.05^0)*(0.95^20) = 0.358

And here we have only one possible permutation, so we do not worry about that.

Then P = 1 - P(1) - P(0) = 1 - 0.377 - 0.358 = 0.265

This means that the probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than one individual is of 0.265 (or 26.5% in percentage form)

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

Let the unknown slope be M2.

The given equation is;

15x + 12y = -144

From equation;

\(slope( m) = \frac{ - coeff. \: of \: x}{coeff. \: of \: y} \)

\(m = \frac{ - 15}{12} \)

\(m = \frac{ - 5}{4} \)

For the condition of perpendicular lines;

\(m \times m2 = - 1\)

\( \frac{ - 5}{4} \times m2 = - 1\)

\( - 5m2 = - 4\)

\(m2 = \frac{ - 4}{ - 5} \)

Therefore, the slope is 4/5.

Hope it helps....

Answer:

89°

Step-By-Step Explanation:

<WYT is the angle 4

<UYW is the angle 5

since angle 4 and 5 are on the same line and

anngle 4 is 91°,

180° - 91° = 89°

This shows that <UYW is 89°

If this helped, please consider picking this answer as the Brainliest Answer. Thank you!

Chau rode the scooter for 69 minutes.

Given that :

Initial fee paid = $8

Fee per minute = 6 cents = 6/100 = $0.06

Hence,

Total ride cost = $8 + (fee per minute × number of Minutes)

If total Cost of ride = $12.14

Let number of minutes = m

Hence, we have :

12.14 = 8 + 0.06m

12.14 - 8 = 0.06m

4.14 = 0.06m

m = 4.14 / 0.06

m = 69

Hence, he rode the scooter for 69 minutes

Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/20046547

The restrictions on the width is that it must be between 14.1 yards and 17.3 yards

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Area = between 240 yd² and 360 yd²

Also, we have

Length = 1.2 times the width

This means that

l = 1.2w

The area is then calculated as

Area = lw

So, we have

Area = 1.2w²

This means that

240 < 1.2w² < 360

Divide through by 1.2

200 < w² < 300

Take the square roots

14.14 < w < 17.32

Approximate

14.1 < w < 17.3

Hence, the width must be between 14.1 yards and 17.3 yards

Read more about areas at

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

Answer:

the answer is A. x + y = 29, 5x + 2y = 100

Step-by-step explanation:

just finished the question

Step-by-step explanation:

Triangles' angles always sum to 180 °

A  Not possible    sum = 185°

B  Not possible    sum = 170°

C  YES    sum = 180°

D YES

E Not possible    sum = 175°