Yes, the given statement "government based upon a written document that limited the power of the government was the norm during the eighteenth century" is true because during the eighteenth century, many governments around the world adopted written constitutions that defined the powers of the government and established limits on those powers.
This was in part a response to the abuses of power by monarchies and other absolute rulers, and the growing belief in the importance of individual rights and freedoms.
The United States Constitution, for example, was adopted in 1787 and is widely regarded as one of the most influential written constitutions in history.
It established a federal system of government with separate branches (executive, legislative, and judicial) and defined the powers of each branch. It also included a Bill of Rights that protected individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press.
The idea of a written constitution as the basis for government became increasingly popular throughout the eighteenth century and has continued to be an important feature of modern democracies around the world.
To know more about written constitutions here:
https://brainly.com/question/14563128
#SPJ4
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
States and localities have the most discretion in establishing policy when federal funding is derived from.
Answer:
A federal mandate
States and localities have the most discretion in establishing policy when federal funding is derived from a federal mandate The Americans with Disabilities Act, which provides protections for the disabled, is an example of shifting the responsibilities and costs for many programs to state governments
Explanation:
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation:
Which method of judicial selection might require confirmation by the state legislature or an executive counsel?
Answer:
Gubernatorial appointment.
Explanation:
With the method of gubernatorial appointment, a state governor will appoint a judge to a particular court, and confirmation by either an executive counsel or state legislation will follow.
lab 14-1 which rule of the federal rules of civil procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports?
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports.
The rule states that an expert witness must provide a written report detailing the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify. The report must include a complete statement of all the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify, the reasons for the opinions, any exhibits to be used as evidence, and the qualifications of the witness.
The report must be provided at least 90 days before the trial date, and the expert must be available for deposition prior to trial. The expert's report must be signed, dated, and served on all parties in the case.
To know more about Federal , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14858877
#SPJ4
Why do people sometimes do things that they really don’t want to do? Check all that apply.
Group of answer choices
don’t know how to get out of the situation
don’t want to hurt someone’s feelings
they have strong confidence in themselves
want to be liked
Answer:
1/2/4
Explanation:
How does the government of a traditional new England small town differ from the government of a large modern city
- A court that does not typically hear original trials, but
whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is
likely to be a(n):
a)Trial Court
b)Civil Court
c) Intermediate Appellate Cour
C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court
An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.
To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here
https://brainly.com/question/33718034
#SPJ11
According to the English bill of rights, who makes laws regarding taxation?
What types of information are part of the electronic discovery process? (Select all that apply.)
metadata
voicemail messages
network system information
computer files
An eight-year-old girl was playing catch on the sidewalk with her friend when her friend made an errant throw over the girl's head. The ball hit a pedestrian, who was walking on the sidewalk in the other direction. The pedestrian angrily threw the ball into the street. The girl ran out into the street to retrieve it and was hit and seriously injured by a car. If the girl's guardian considers legal action on her behalf against the pedestrian and the driver of the car, which of the following best states the pedestrian's liability?
A. The girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence.
B. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, but the driver may obtain contribution from the pedestrian.
C. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, but the driver may obtain indemnity from the pedestrian.
D. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, and the driver will not be able to obtain contribution or indemnity from the pedestrian.
The pedestrian may be held liable for negligence, and the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian.
What is the basis for the pedestrian's potential liability and the girl's claim against them?In this scenario, the pedestrian may be considered negligent for angrily throwing the ball into the street, creating a hazardous situation. Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. By throwing the ball into the street, the pedestrian potentially breached their duty of care towards others on the sidewalk, including the eight-year-old girl.
As a result of the pedestrian's negligent act, the girl suffered serious injuries when she ran out into the street to retrieve the ball and was hit by a car. The pedestrian's action directly contributed to the chain of events leading to the girl's injuries.
Therefore, the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence, seeking compensation for her injuries, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from the accident.
Learn more about: negligence
brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of a power that is given to the
National Government?
O Coining money
Establishing courts
O Regulating trade within a state
Borrowing money
Mateo was the first responder at a crime scene. He ensured that the scene was safe. Other officers arrived. What should Mateo and the officers do
next?
OA. They must secure the crime scene.
OB. Nothing; they need to wait for others to arrive.
OC. They should take photos from all angles.
OD. They are required to collect evidence.
Mateo and the other officers should, based on being the first responders A. secure the crime scene.
What should the first responder do ?Once Mateo has ensred that the scene is safe, the next step for him and the other officers would be to secure the crime scene. Securing the crime scene involves taking steps to preserve and protect the area to ensure that evidence is not contaminated, destroyed, or tampered with.
This can include actions such as stting up physical barriers, restricting access to the area, and preventing unauthorized personnel from entering.
Securing the crime scene is crcial to maintain the integrity of the evidence and increase the chances of a successful investigation.
Find out more on first responders at https://brainly.com/question/20719492
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer.
When a responder fails to take action when they have a legal responsibility to act, this is called:
A.
Neglect
B.
Abandonment
C.
Good Samaritan
D.
Consent
Answer:
A, neglect
Explanation:
All the other ones were talking about giving up something(abandonment),being responsible( good Samaritan), Having an approval to do something specific(Consent) But, from all of those Neglect was the one not being responsible in fear and being an able to take actions.
a property owner who owns his property in fee simple does not have to abide by zoning regulations. group of answer choices true false
Owning a property in fee simple, which confers unlimited ownership, enjoyment, and transfer of interests in the real estate, does not mean that the owner will not abide by zoning regulations. So the statement is FALSE.
The property owner must abide by zoning regulations, deed, or subdivision restrictions and covenants. The owner must not infringe on the public welfare with the use of the property.Otherwise, a property in fee simple means that the owner can:
do whatever he likes with the propertyuse the property sell the property to another personrent it out instead of outright saleallow heirs to inheritand ownership is not limited in time.Thus, ownership of property in fee simple confers the highest ownership right in real estate.
Learn more about property in fee simple at https://brainly.com/question/17276804
PLEASE HURRY
Why did the Anti-Federalists urge the addition of a bill of rights to the Constitution?
O to check the power of state governments
to lower the costs of government
O to protect individual liberties
O to abolish slavery
Answer:
To protect individual liberties
Explanation:
a antisocialble behavior order is a order That will prevent you from being antisocialble with people and choosing not To Make friends
Answer:
There are types of antisocial behaviors
Explanation:
Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)
Borderline personality disorder (BPD)
Histrionic personality disorder.
Narcissistic personality disorder.
these are just a few
but APD or antisocial personality disorder is a mental health disorder characterized by disregard for other people.
Those with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) may begin to show symptoms in childhood, but the condition can't be diagnosed until adolescence or adulthood.
Those with antisocial personality disorder tend to lie, break laws, act impulsively, and lack regard for their own safety or the safety of others. Symptoms may lessen with age.
Should people living with HIV be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status to prospective partners; why or why not? Should a participant be legally required to disclose, if they have taken precautions to limit the transfer of HIV?
No, people living with HIV should not be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status.
HIV is a virus, rather than a crime, and its transmission between consenting adults should not be criminalized. While disclosure of HIV status is important for reducing the risk of transmission, forcing those with HIV to disclose is not always in the interests of public health, and can be a violation of autonomy and privacy.
The legality of disclosing one's HIV status should be left to the individual to decide, and if other precautions have been taken, it should not be legally required.
To know more about HIV , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31765366
#SPJ4
Scenario:
A new piece of equipment has arrived and your supervisor is anxious to put it to use. You can usually figure out how to operate
equipment, but you've never used this before. Your supervisor hands you the manual and says, "Ok, get started!" As he walks off, he turns and says, "Oh, and be careful." You understand the urgency, but are nervous about using the new equipment.
Question:
Which of these employee rights might affect what you do? Select the rights you think are most relevant to your solution.
- Right to rules and regulation
- Right to training
- Right to non-retaliation
- Right to data access
- Right to promote safety
- Right to inspections
The following Scenario "Right to training" is the most relevant employee rights.
Rights are basic normative norms regarding what is permitted of individuals or due to people in accordance with some legal system, social custom, or ethical theory. Rights are therefore legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement. In fields like law and ethics, especially in notions of justice and deontology, rights are fundamentally important.
Any civilization must have rights, and attempts to define and reinterpret them frequently recur throughout social conflict history. Rights "determine the form of governments, the substance of laws, and the shape of morality as it is now viewed," according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
To know more about Rights here
https://brainly.com/question/2775117
#SPJ1
If you wanted to obtain eoples of inspection reports of a state-owned building, what guarantees that you would get the coplea?
A. The Freedom of Information Act
B.Writing a request letter
C.Going to the county
governing body
D. Going to the county building in person
Answer:
B.Writing a request letter
C.Going to the county
governing body
D. Going to the county building in person
Explanation:
If you wanted to obtain eoples of inspection reports of a state-owned building, what guarantees that you would get the coplea?
What was the brown v stone court case about?
Answer:
Explanation:
It was about the right of a parent to with hold immunization from a child for religious reasons. The immunizations would have protected the child from diseases described by health officials (I think in the state of MIssissippi).
The religious right appeal goes right back to the First Amendment which guarantees religious freedom. The court found that when a child endangers himself or others by not being protected from deadly diseases, the First Amendment's protection does not apply.
Gypsum is soluble in water because the attractive forces between the solute particles are greater than the attractive forces between the solute and the solvent particles. Group of answer choices True False
False. Gypsum(CaSO4·2H2O) is not soluble in water because the attractive forces between the solute particles and the solvent particles (water) are greater than the attractive forces between the solute particles.
In other words, the water molecules are able to surround and separate the gypsum particles due to their strong attraction to the charged sulfate and calcium ions in gypsum. However, this solubility can be increased by adding acid or increasing the temperature, which can break down the strong ionic bonds between the gypsum particles and allow for greater solubility.
In the case of gypsum, the attractive forces between the gypsum molecules are strong enough that only a small amount of gypsum dissolves in water. The solubility of gypsum in water is about 2.4 grams per liter, which is considered low. So, the statement that the attractive forces between the solute particles are greater than the attractive forces between the solute and the solvent particles is incorrect for gypsum.
To know more about Gypsum visit-
brainly.com/question/18369612
#SPJ11
how did the defense dismantle the prosecution’s case against oj?
The OJ Simpson trial was one of the most high-profile criminal trials in American history, and it was closely followed by millions of people around the world.
OJ Simpson was charged with the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman.The defense team, led by Johnnie Cochran, was able to dismantle the prosecution's case in a number of ways. First, they argued that the LAPD had mishandled the evidence and contaminated the crime scene, raising doubts about the reliability of the forensic evidence.
They also argued that the prosecution's star witness, LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman, had a history of racism and had planted evidence to frame Simpson. This argument was supported by audio recordings in which Fuhrman used racist language.Furthermore, the defense team was able to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors by presenting alternative theories of the crime.
To know more about criminal click here
brainly.com/question/30428746
#SPJ11
Which approach to foreign policy involves sending ambassadors to other countries?
Isolation
Diplomacy
Intervention
ImperialismWhich approach to foreign policy involves sending ambassadors to other countries?
Isolation
Diplomacy
Intervention
Imperialism
Answer: The approach to foreign policy that involves sending ambassadors to other countries is Diplomacy
Explanation:
(Case Study Question) Because Henry has a history of heart disease, he is concerned that his poor health may leave him incapacitated in the future. He would like to give his oldest child the right to make medical decisions if he is so ill he is unable to make them himself. Which of the following documents would accomplish this?
A) Living will
B) Power of appointment
C) Living trust
D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC)
The document that would accomplish Henry's goal of granting his oldest child the right to make medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated is option D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC).
A Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care is a legal document that allows an individual (the principal) to designate someone (the agent or attorney-in-fact) to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they become unable to do so themselves. This document ensures that Henry's wishes regarding his medical treatment and care are respected and followed, even if he is unable to communicate or make decisions.
Unlike a living will, which only specifies a person's preferences for end-of-life care, a DPOAHC grants broader decision-making authority to the designated agent. It allows the agent to make medical decisions in a variety of situations, not just limited to end-of-life care.
By selecting the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, Henry can ensure that his oldest child has the legal authority to act as his healthcare advocate and make important medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated due to his poor health.
Learn more about attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/31861735
#SPJ4
Examples of unethical conduct investigating officer should refrain from
An examples of an unethical conduct that an investigating officer should refrain from includes:
lyingdeceptionprejudicediscriminationegoism.What is an unethical conduct?These refers to those behavior exhibited by a professional, which are oppose to what is expected of such individual occupying such position to act in normal circumstance.
Some example of an Unethical behavior from people in power are:
Officers using the Internal Revenue Service to exploit some groups because he hate them.Officer using the public funds for luxury.These unethical behavior of people in power have a massive effect on ordinary citizens and public workers as the masses might lose confidence on ability of the person in power, encourages unethical behavior among officers etc.
Read more about unethical conduct
brainly.com/question/24518056
#SPJ1
smith v. allwright resulted in the end of white primary laws because race was the primary criterion for discrimination, so the laws violated the fifteenth amendment.
The statement "smith v. allwright resulted in the end of white primary laws because race was the primary criterion for discrimination, so the laws violated the fifteenth amendment." is true as Smith v. Allwright was a landmark Supreme Court case that resulted in the end of white primary laws.
White primary laws in the United States were challenged and ultimately abolished as a result of Smith v. Allwright but the Supreme Court's decision was made for slightly different reasons. The Court ruled in the case that the Fifteenth Amendment's prohibition against racial discrimination in voting was violated by the white primary system which barred African Americans from voting in primary elections.
The Court stressed that the state handing over of the primary election process to political parties allowed those parties to engage in racial discrimination which violated the voting rights of African Americans rather than emphasizing race as the only factor for discrimination. This important ruling contributed to the expansion of all citizens voting rights by helping to abolish the racist system of white primary elections.
Learn more about smith v. allwright at:
brainly.com/question/6641245
#SPJ4
The complete question is "smith v. allwright resulted in the end of white primary laws because race was the primary criterion for discrimination, so the laws violated the fifteenth amendment. true or false"
If you are involved in a motor vehicle accident that causes injury to another person while your driving privileges are suspended, you are subject to.
If you are involved in a motor vehicle accident that causes injury to another person, while your driving privileges are suspended, you are subject to a fine, continued suspension, and the potential for a minimum 45-day jail sentence.
A motorist needs to prevent and stay stopped for a pedestrian who's crossing at a marked crosswalk when the pedestrian is upon or inside one lane of, the 1/2 of the roadway, upon which the car is visiting or onto which its miles turning.
Using below the impact of intoxicating drinks means that a motive force's senses & judgment are impaired. After simply 2, 3, and 4 drinks alcohol starts offevolved to impair reaction time, coordination, and balance.
Learn more about vehicle accidents here https://brainly.com/question/28274708
#SPJ4
a well-known scientist testifies that she believes a piece of evidence is accepted by science. the judge rules that the evidence is not, in his opinion, admissible. which case applies to the decision?
The court determines that the evidence is not, in his opinion, acceptable notwithstanding a well-known scientist's testimony that she thinks it is accepted by science.
What court case is described as being the general acceptance rule for the admission of scientific evidence? United States v. Frye According to Frye, in order for scientific evidence to be admitted into court as evidence, it must be commonly acknowledged by other scientists working in the same field or profession.A witness may give testimony in the form of an opinion if they are qualified as experts by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.The law mandates the disclosure of both mitigating and exculpatory evidence. Evidence that would not normally be admitted at trial need not be.Although scientists frequently utilize evidence in other ways, such as when applying ideas to real-world issues, scientific evidence is evidence that helps to either support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis.To learn more about scientific evidence refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/507522
#SPJ4
The most important law officials in the American colonies were the
the ANSWER IS sheriff
Answer:
sheriff
Explanation:
oeoei3o2299222i2k2