Answers
The two ways in which Congress ensures that federal agencies follow legislative intent are budgetary and oversight and Investigation agencies
1. Budgetary Control: Congress controls the budgetary process in the United States, which gives it significant power over federal agencies. Congress can decide how much money each agency receives, how the funds are distributed, and how they are spent. By using budgetary controls, Congress can force agencies to comply with legislative intent. For example, if Congress believes an agency is not following legislative intent, it can reduce the agency's budget, limiting its ability to perform certain functions.
2. Oversight and Investigation: Congress has the power to oversee and investigate federal agencies, ensuring that they follow legislative intent. It can hold hearings, demand documents, and call agency officials to testify. By using these tools, Congress can identify areas where agencies are not complying with legislative intent and take corrective action. Oversight and investigation can also help identify areas where legislative intent is unclear or ambiguous, allowing Congress to clarify the law and ensure that agencies understand their obligations.
You can learn more about Congress at: https://brainly.com/question/31333444
#SPJ11
Related Questions
what is the summary of Duties and responsibilities of the Investigating Team
Answers
Answer:
The rights and welfare of participants must be safeguarded by researchers, who must also adhere to all local, state, and federal laws that may be in force. Researchers are expected to adhere to ethical standards and principles that are appropriate for their field and research. In order to conduct and design clinical trials, investigators are expected to adhere to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards.
Explanation:
Answer:
The team's primary responsibility is to gather facts, data, and any evidence while establishing the sequence of events that led up to the event that prompted the investigation. They also analyze the data and draw conclusions based on their findings.
what will happen if you are married illegally in a foreign individual?
Answers
Explanation:
An individual will be charged with marriage fraud if they entered into a marriage for the purpose of evading U.S. immigration law. This felony offense carries a prison sentence of up to five years and a fine of up to $250,000, and applies to both foreign nationals and U.S. citizens who perpetrate this crime.
intellectual property (ip) is different from personal property in that it cannot be bought, sold, donated, licensed, or exchanged for something of equal value. True or False?
Answers
False. Intellectual property (IP) is different from personal property in terms of its nature; IP refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, artistic works, designs, and symbols.
Personal property refers to tangible items that you own, such as a car or furniture. However, IP can still be bought, sold, donated, licensed, or exchanged for something of equal value, just like personal property.
Inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, and symbols, names, and pictures used in business are all examples of intellectual property (IP).
Patents, copyright, and trademarks are a few instances of IP protection under the law allowing people to profit financially or gain notoriety from their creations. The IP system seeks to provide an environment where creativity and innovation are encouraged by striking the correct balance between the interests of innovators and the larger public interest.
learn more about Intellectual property here:
brainly.com/question/1621623
#SPJ4
CANADIAN LAW - What are three reasons why intoxication shouldn’t be used as a defence in a court of law?
Answers
Three reasons why intoxication shouldn’t be used as a defense in a court of law include:
Intoxication does not excuse criminal behavior.It is not fair to the victim to use intoxication to escape justice.Intoxication does not necessarily negate intent or premeditationWhy is intoxication not a defense ?A person is still responsible for their actions, even if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the crime. Intoxication can be used as a way to escape responsibility for committing a crime, which is not fair to the victim or society as a whole.
The presence of intent or premeditation, which are crucial elements in establishing the seriousness of a crime, is not always disproved by intoxication.
Find out more on intoxication at https://brainly.com/question/30279443
#SPJ1
Ford, GM, and Stellantis produce electric vehicles. Provide an explanation for whether each of the following activities would be legal or illegal based on US antitrust law. (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree not to lower prices for the rest of 2022. (b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis have electric vehicle factories in different US states, but they sell their vehicles in every US state. (c) Due to higher input prices (i.e. labor costs and computer chips). Ford, GM, and Stellantis each increased the price of new electric vehicles this year. (d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US. Ford will take the Eastern region, GM will take the Midwest region, and Stellantis will take the Western region.
Answers
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices for the rest of 2022 would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement would be classified as price fixing, which is an anticompetitive practice. Price fixing involves competitors colluding to set prices at a certain level, eliminating competition and harming consumers. Such agreements are typically prohibited under US antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. Price fixing reduces consumer choice, suppresses competition, and can result in higher prices for consumers.
(b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis having electric vehicle factories in different US states but selling their vehicles in every US state would generally be legal under US antitrust law. This situation does not involve any explicit anticompetitive practices such as price fixing or market allocation. As long as each company competes independently in the marketplace and does not engage in collusion or other forms of anticompetitive behavior, their ability to sell vehicles across state lines is generally permissible.
(c) Ford, GM, and Stellantis increasing the price of new electric vehicles due to higher input prices, such as labor costs and computer chips, would likely be legal under US antitrust law. Pricing decisions based on legitimate factors such as increased production costs are generally within the purview of individual companies. As long as these companies do not coordinate their pricing decisions through collusion or anticompetitive agreements, they have the discretion to set prices according to their own cost structures and market conditions.
(d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US, with each company taking control of a specific region, would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement is known as market allocation, where competitors divide markets among themselves, eliminating competition in certain areas. Market allocation agreements are generally considered anticompetitive and are prohibited under US antitrust laws. These agreements harm competition, restrict consumer choice, and can lead to higher prices. In the given scenario, if Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into specific regions, it would restrict competition and violate antitrust laws.
In summary, (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
Learn more about illegal
https://brainly.com/question/27375182
#SPJ11
A defense attorney will likely obtain the most information concerning his/her client's case from the following
Select one:
a. Post-trial hearings
b. Pretrial discussions with the DA
c. Pretrial discovery
d. Internet searches
Answers
Answer:
c pretrial discovery
Explanation:
the defence attorney should make research on the case before the case trial
HELP! In addition to the physical fitness test, or PFT, every applicant to the FBI must pass _____.
a polygraph test
a background check
a background check and a polygraph test
a background check, a polygraph and a defensive driving examinatione
Answers
Answer:
A polygraph test.
Explanation:
They obviously perform a background check, but after you receive a conditional offer you must pass a polygraph examination.
Answer:
the answer is a
Explanation:
When a counselor communicates with a client using e-mail:_____
a. the counselor should never include anything that is confidential because it is unethical to do so.
b. the client's business e-mail address should never be used because employers often read the e-mail messages of their employees.
c. the client should be told to avoid using e-mail to set or change appointment times because it is impossible to tell whether the counselor received the message that was sent.
d. the client should be advised that e-mail messages can always be retrieved and that e-mail systems are not as secure as other means of communication.
e. the counselor should never print out the e-mail messages because the client s confidentiality would be compromised by the existence of paper copies.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is E
Explanation:
Whenever you're talking to a client there is always confidentiality, unless you or someone else is in danger they are not allowed to say anything PERIOD. whether it's over phone, email, text, or talking in person they are never allowed to share. <3 hope this helps
which case did the supreme court rule that the right to privacy extended to a woman's choice to have an abortion? group of answer choices
engel v. vitale (1962)
mapp v. ohio (1962)
gideon v. wainwright (1963)
roe v. wade (1973)
Answers
The Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade (1973) that the right to privacy extends to a woman's choice to have an abortion. In this case, the court ruled that the Texas law criminalizing abortion was unconstitutional because it violated a woman's right to privacy.
The correct option is Roe v. Wade (1973).
The Supreme Court issued a historic ruling in Roe v. Wade (1973), establishing a woman's right to choose to have an abortion, which was based on the constitutional right to privacy. The court ruled that the state of Texas could not criminalize abortion, as doing so would violate a woman's right to privacy.
The decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) was controversial and has been the subject of debate ever since, with some arguing that the court overstepped its bounds and others arguing that it was a landmark victory for women's rights.The court's decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) was based on the concept of substantive due process, which holds that certain fundamental rights are implicit in the Constitution.
The court held that a woman's right to privacy is one of these fundamental rights, and that the state's interest in protecting fetal life is not sufficient to outweigh the woman's right to choose to have an abortion. In addition, the court ruled that the state may regulate abortion after the first trimester in order to protect the woman's health and the potential life of the fetus, but that it may not prohibit abortion entirely.
To know more about Texas law criminalizing visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29997458
#SPJ11
?Which statementWhich statement describes them essential part of the rule of law
Answers
but the rule law of the essential statement- you have to always tell the truth
if a contractor does not get paid for his work, what kind of lien will he file?
Answers
A contractor who does not get paid for their work can file a mechanic's lien. This type of lien is a legal claim against a property when a contractor has provided labor, materials, equipment, or services, and has not been paid for the work they provided.
A mechanic's lien is a powerful tool that allows the contractor to collect the money owed to them. In order to file a mechanic's lien, the contractor must first provide the property owner with a Notice of Intent to Lien. This document must be sent to the property owner within 90 days of completing the work and must include the details of the work that was done and the amount that is owed.
After the Notice of Intent to Lien is sent, the contractor can then file the lien with the local court. This lien will be against the property until the amount owed is paid in full.
To know more about contractor , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31457618
#SPJ4
How many instances of domestic violence does the prosecution have against OJ while he was married to Nicole?
Answers
Answer:
2
Explanation:
should hate speech be regulated? (in a 5 page essay form)
Answers
Answer:
No since it can cause people to harm others because of their nationality and their ethnicity. That’s the reason why the law didn’t regulate hate speeches, it only makes people hate each other and they know it isn’t right.
Explanation:
this is all i can come up with ill do some more
How many fish toes can you count while blinking and holding a pencil with your finger nail at 2pm and a Saturday morning?
Answers
I can count 1.
You can count 10.
T/F a parent who leads an immoral lifestyle cannot be awarded custody.
Answers
The statement is false because there is no legal basis for denying custody to a parent solely based on their lifestyle choices.
As long as a parent is able to provide a safe and stable environment for their child, their personal choices and behavior are not relevant to the custody decision. However, if a parent's lifestyle choices put the child in danger or negatively impact their well-being, such as substance abuse or criminal behavior, it may be considered in the custody decision.
Ultimately, the best interests of the child are the top priority in custody cases, and factors such as the ability to provide for the child's physical and emotional needs, and the parent-child relationship, are given more weight than lifestyle choices.
Learn more about lifestyle https://brainly.com/question/31234440
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Do you think a position in law enforcement should require a college degree? Is a law enforcement officer better equipped to do their job if they are more educated? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
no. I think taking like a certain test at least get an idea of how you think and how quick you can react to danger and panic is important but for a job like law enforcement I think you just need training in Behavior and basic things like how to use a gun and what to do if your under attack or something's wrong with a child things that take more than just reading a book, you need actual experience
1. Where on a child's body would it be strange to find an injury not mentioned in the slides?
2. Who was Nixzmary Brown and what happened in her case (you may need to look her up on an external webpage)? What could have changed the outcome in this case?
3. Since neglect is the most common form of abuse, what are some of your ideas about prevention (list a minimum of two and explain the implementation)?
4. You are given a case to investigate. A 13-year-old child is addicted to drugs. The mother knows her child is doing drugs but does nothing about it. Is this a form of abuse? Explain your answer and include what type of abuse you conclude this falls under. If you determine that this is not an example of abuse, you must explain why you do not consider this abuse. What would you do in this case (as the investigator)? Explain why you answered the way you did.
Answers
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange.
2. To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect.
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange. However, injuries to certain areas such as the genitals, breasts, or inner thighs would typically raise concerns about possible abuse or inappropriate behavior. These areas are considered particularly sensitive, and injuries in these locations may indicate potential harm or mistreatment.
2. Nixzmary Brown was a seven-year-old girl who was tragically killed by her parents in 2006. Her case garnered significant media attention and exposed failures within the child welfare system. Nixzmary suffered from severe physical abuse and neglect, and her parents subjected her to prolonged abuse, leading to her death. The case revealed various systemic failures, including missed opportunities by child welfare agencies and schools to intervene and protect Nixzmary from her abusive parents.
To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial. Ensuring effective information sharing and collaboration between schools, child welfare agencies, law enforcement, and medical professionals would enable early detection and intervention in cases of child abuse. Additionally, enhancing training and awareness for professionals and the public regarding the signs of abuse and neglect can help identify and report cases more effectively.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives. Community support programs can provide resources and assistance to families in need, such as access to affordable housing, job training, mental health services, and childcare options. By addressing the underlying issues that contribute to neglect, such programs can help alleviate stressors and provide support to parents, reducing the likelihood of neglectful behaviors.
Parenting education initiatives are also essential in preventing neglect. These programs can offer classes and workshops that teach parents about child development, positive discipline techniques, communication skills, and stress management. By equipping parents with knowledge and skills, they can better understand their child's needs and respond appropriately, reducing the risk of neglect.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect. By ignoring the situation and not seeking help or intervention, the mother is failing to provide the necessary care and support her child requires.
This type of neglect falls under the category of physical neglect as it involves the failure to ensure the child's physical well-being and safety. Substance abuse can have severe consequences on a child's health, development, and overall welfare. Neglecting to address drug addiction puts the child at significant risk and can lead to long-term harm.
As an investigator, it would be important to assess the situation further, gather evidence, and determine the extent of the child's drug addiction and the impact it has on their well-being. The next steps would involve involving appropriate authorities, such as child protective services or law enforcement, to ensure the child's safety and initiate appropriate interventions. The goal would be to provide support and resources to the child and the family to address the addiction and mitigate further harm to the child's well-being.
Know more about Drug addiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12039156
#SPJ8
distinguish social behavior and legal behavior for example
Answers
Answer:
What is the difference between ethical behavior and legal behavior?
The distinction is important. Actions are 'legal' if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. ... A formally adopted code of ethics is a legal requirement; when you violate a state or local government code of ethics there are specific consequences.
Explanation:
define the main concepts of citizenship?
Answers
Answer:
A citizen is a participatory member of a political community. Citizenship is gained by meeting the legal requirements of a national, state, or local government. A nation grants certain rights and privileges to its citizens. In return, citizens are expected to obey their country's laws and defend it against its enemies.
Rights: Citizenship includes the legal and constitutional rights granted to individuals by the government of a country, such as the right to vote, freedom of speech and religion, the right to a fair trial, and the right to work and own property.
Responsibilities: Citizenship also involves the responsibilities and obligations that come with being a member of a community, such as paying taxes, serving on a jury, obeying laws, and being an active participant in the democratic process.
Participation: Active participation in the democratic process, such as voting in elections and engaging in public discourse, is an essential part of citizenship.
Identity: Citizenship is also tied to one's identity, such as their cultural heritage, language, and customs, which are often protected and celebrated by the government of their country.
Inclusion and Diversity: Citizenship also emphasizes the importance of inclusion and diversity, recognizing the differences and diversity of individuals and promoting equal rights and opportunities for all members of a society, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or socioeconomic status.
Overall, the main concepts of citizenship highlight the importance of being an active and responsible member of society, while also emphasizing the importance of individual rights and inclusion.
In our state's prisons testing for prohibited substances doesn't include alcohol. Cite ONLY the correct Code with your T or F.
Answers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Since 2018, alcohol has been removed from the list of prohibited substances and is therefore not analyzed in state prisons in most states. However, in cases of driving vehicles in which the driver is under the effect of alcohol, this substance is considered if a prohibited substance test is carried out, as driving under the influence of alcohol is prohibited throughout the country.
Which of the following is an example of a suspicionless search?
A) Search of a vehicle without consent or probable cause
B) Search of a person and bag at a highway checkpoint
C) Search of a home without
consent or probable cause
D) All of the above
Answers
Answer:
Imma go with D. Not sure with B, but since A and B are it makes since its D.
Explanation:
Security incident indicators that deserve special attention from users and/ or system administrators include
Answers
Security incident indicators that deserve aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.
What are Security incident indicators?A Security incident indicators refers to indicator that signifies that a security has been compromised or have been in process of being compromised.
In conclusion, the Security incident indicators that deserve aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.
Read more about Security incident indicators
brainly.com/question/25164014
Which situation would not be considered a civil law case?
a. A married couple getting divorced.
b. An employee steals products from their employer.
c. A customer slips on a wet floor inside a restaurant.
Answers
Answer:
A civil case is when a person or business claims to have been harmed by the actions of another person or business.
Explanation:
so it should be b
Who must be properly licensed and receive general awareness/familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazmat
Answers
Answer:
All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.
Explanation:
This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness. HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing. This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face. The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.
TRUE/FALSE. The principle of responsibility means that individuals, organizations, and societies should be held accountable to others for the consequences of their actions.
Answers
True. The principle of responsibility indeed suggests that individuals, organizations, and societies should be held accountable for the consequences of their actions.
It emphasizes the idea that one's actions and decisions have an impact on others and the broader community, and therefore, there is a moral obligation to take responsibility for the outcomes that result from those actions. This principle promotes ethical behavior, encourages individuals to consider the potential consequences of their choices, and advocates for accountability in personal, professional, and societal contexts. Holding individuals and organizations responsible for their actions fosters a sense of fairness and promotes a more just and responsible society.
Learn more about societies
https://brainly.com/question/3144723
#SPJ4
Don Long is convicted of second-degree murder for killing a woman he had been seeing over the last few months. The court sentenced
him to 30 years in jail. One year after his trial, Don admits that he withheld evidence that
would have cleared him. He states he did so to protect his twin brother, who actually
committed the crime, but who was dying of cancer at the time. He further states that he
did not want his brother to spend the last years of his life behind bars. His brother has
since died. The evidence is conclusive as to Don's innocence. Should the court set aside his conviction due to the new evidence?
What policies would support the court in not
doing so?
Answers
Answer:
Double jeopardy may prevent Don Long from being tried twice.
Don Long is convicted of second-degree murder for killing a woman he had been seeing over the last few months. The double jeopardy may prevent Don Long from being tried twice.
What is a sentence?A sentence is a set of words that are put together and which has meaning or makes complete sense of something. A sentence is the basic unit of language which expresses or makes a complete thought.
A sentence is formed by following the grammatical basic rules of syntax. For example:" John is running". A complete sentence has at least a subject and a main verb to state (declare) a complete thought. For example: Kate walks.
The first letter of the first word in a sentence will always be capital. At the end of the sentence there is a punctuation mark depending on whether it is a statement, a question, a command, a request or an exclamation.
Learn more about sentence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29140135
#SPJ2
if an officer is sued in court the officer may invovke _________ meaning the officer cannot be held liable for discretionary duties performed in good faith during the course of normal job duties
A.offical immunity
B.good faith immunity
C.discretionary immunity
D.officer immunity
Answers
When an officer is sued in court, the officer may invoke Option B. good faith immunity, meaning the officer cannot be held liable for discretionary duties performed in good faith during the course of normal job duties.
The term "immunity" refers to the freedom or exemption from legal action. Immunity, in general, is used to protect government officials from civil lawsuits and criminal charges brought against them for doing their job. When an individual is sued in court, they can be granted immunity from certain lawsuits if the legal system determines that the individual is acting in the line of duty or is following proper legal guidelines.
Good faith immunity: Good faith immunity is a kind of immunity that exempts public officials from legal action if they made a reasonable decision based on the information they had available. This immunity protects officials from civil and criminal liability if they acted in good faith when making their decision and used their discretion appropriately. This type of immunity is usually reserved for law enforcement officials who are making decisions during the course of their job duties and who are expected to use their discretion to make decisions based on the information available to them.
Discretionary duties performed in good faith during the course of normal job duties are duties that are considered necessary for the officer to do their job effectively. This immunity is designed to protect officers from being sued by individuals who are unhappy with the decisions they made during the course of their job duties. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Know more about Immunity here:
https://brainly.com/question/29793582
#SPJ8
How did zebulon brockway's use of indeterminate sentences ultimately result in earning the title "father of american parole?"
brockway was called the "father of american parole" by the prison guards in connecticut because they predicted he would become famous
by introducing indeterminate sentences
brockway believed in reformation, seeing indeterminate sentences as allowing time for prisoners to lessen their prison time by good
behavior and accessing education and trade training
brockway, like maconochie, wrote a book on american prisons, which became a best seller, and so brockway spent most of the rest of his
career giving lectures on prison reform
brockway was like maconochie when he introduced work-and-release system, which became popular with his supervisors, but brockway
had much opposition from his peers who did not see the value of reform
Answers
Brockway is widely regarded as the Father of Prison Reform and the Father of American Parole.
His plan was to rehabilitate convicts and reward them with early release for good behavior and hard labor.
Brockway spent the majority of his tenure as the administrator of the Elmira Reformatory.
About Zebulon Brockway:On April 28, 1827, Brockway was born in Lyme, Connecticut.In 1848, he began working as a prison guard or assistant warden in the state jail in Wethersfield, Connecticut. By the age of 23, Brockway was working as a clerk at the Wethersfield prison. He later spent four years as the assistant superintendent of the Municipal Alms House in Albany, New York.In 1854, he was appointed administrator of the Monroe County Penitentiary in New York.Brockway is widely regarded as the Father of Prison Reform and the Father of American Parole. His plan was to rehabilitate convicts and reward them with early release for good behavior and hard labor. Brockway spent the majority of his tenure as the administrator of the Elmira Reformatory.Therefore, Brockway is widely regarded as the Father of Prison Reform and the Father of American Parole.
His plan was to rehabilitate convicts and reward them with early release for good behavior and hard labor.
Brockway spent the majority of his tenure as the administrator of the Elmira Reformatory.
Know more about Father of American Parole here:
https://brainly.com/question/14384632
#SPJ4
Which of the following is true of crime rate statistics?
1.) Politicians use them to budget funds for criminal justice programs.
2.)There are not accurate enough crime statistics to use in policy decisions.
3.)Researchers use them to explain the surge in crime over the last two decades.
10 POINTS ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answers
The true statement about crime rate statistics is that the there are not accurate enough crime statistics to use in policy decisions.
What is a crime rate statistics?Generally, the crime rate refers to the ratio between the number of felonies or misdemeanours recorded by the police and gendarmerie and the population in question. In other words, it is also seen as the ratio of crimes in an area to the population of that area which is expressed per 1000 population per year.
Going forwards, the crime rate statistics are usually collected by governments for the reporting of incidents of criminal activity and these statistics often include section which were chosen to provide a sampling of how crime statistics can be useful beyond simply reporting incidents of criminal behavior.
Also, It is very important to understand that crime statistics do not provide a perfect view of crime. However, the statistics on crime only show data for crimes that have been reported to authorities.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about crime rate
brainly.com/question/13772436
#SPJ1