Following this news, many people feared the world was on the brink of nuclear war. However, disaster was avoided when the U.S. agreed to Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev's (1894-1971) offer to remove the Cuban missiles in exchange for the U.S. promising not to invade Cuba.
Which statement best describes the difference between French and English colonies in North America?
The French established small trading posts funded by a king, while the English created large, privately financed
colonies.
O The French created large, privately financed colonies, while the English established small trading posts funded by a
king.
O The English established small trading posts far from the East Coast, while the French created large colonies along
the coast.
O The English created small trading posts on the Northwest Passage, while the French established cash crops on the
East Coast.
Answer:
the french established small trading posts funded by a king while the English created large privately financed colonies
Explanation:
quizlet
Answer:
The answer is A
The French established small trading posts funded by a king, while the English created large, privately financed colonies.
Explanation:
I did the edg review! :)
During war time in history did clinical work become prominent?
A. During Wendi’s practice
B. World War II
C. World War I
D. During the inception of behavioral psychology
During World War I and World War II, clinical work became prominent. The correct options are B and C.
During times of war, especially World War I and World War II, the demand for clinical work increased significantly. These conflicts resulted in large numbers of soldiers experiencing physical injuries, trauma, and psychological distress. As a result, the need for clinical services, including medical treatment and mental health support, became more prominent.
During World War I, advancements in medicine and psychiatry led to the establishment of specialized medical units and psychiatric hospitals to treat soldiers suffering from physical and psychological wounds. Similarly, during World War II, clinical work expanded further to address the physical and mental health needs of military personnel.
The correct options are B and C.
To know more about World War I, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/32148773
#SPJ4
england declared war on spain in 1739 because of a desire to group of answer choices win commercial privileges from its ally france. avenge spanish piracy of english merchant ships. end spanish involvement in smuggling activities. dominate trade in the atlantic basin.
England declared war on Spain in 1739 because of a desire to dominate trade in the Atlantic basin. Thus, option D is the correct option.
In order to control commerce in the Atlantic basin, England waged war on Spain in 1739. The connections between the European and North American parts of the British Empire were strengthened throughout the Wars for Empire (1689–1763) in the 17th and 18th centuries. In four different conflicts, Great Britain fought French imperial and colonial armies for control of swaths of what is now Canada and the Ohio Valley.
During the Jenkins' Ear War (1739–1748), Spain and Britain clashed in North America. As various Native American tribes allied themselves with beleaguered European nations throughout these struggles for dominance of North America, colonists were obliged to create alliances with them or develop animosity toward them.
Learn more about the Atlantic Basin here:
https://brainly.com/question/22595220
#SPJ4
I need brainliest so everyone if I have answered any of your questions pls mark me brainliest
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
I hope you have a nice day
What was a major disagreement between federalists and anti-federalists during the ratification of the u. S. Constitution?.
A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a strong union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the constitution.
What was a major disagreement between Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the ratification of the US Constitution?
The Federalists thought individual rights could best be protected through a Constitution that included a bill of rights; the anti-Federalists opposed any effort to consolidate power in the central government.opposed any attempt to increase the amount of authority held by the federal government.A powerful central government was resisted by the Anti-Federalists. It omitted the bill of rights and gave the federal government excessive power at the expense of state and local government authority. gave federal and the strongest case against it was that it wasn't included
To know more about federalits click on the link below
https://brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ4
can somebody help pls!! Thank u
who Translated the New Testament into greek
Answer: Neofytos Vamvas
Explanation:
Answer: the new testament of the bible was translated by Neofytos Vamvas
Explanation: while Desiderius Erasmus, who in 1516 published an edition of the New Testament containing the Greek text .
SORRY I GAVE TWO ANSWER THAT BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THE NEW TESTAMENT OF THE BIBLE OR JUST NEW TESTAMENT INTO GREEK
which of the following best explains the cause of the emergence of new political parties in the early nineteenth century?
The option that best explains the cause of the emergence of new political parties in the early nineteenth century is option A: Continued debates over the proper role of the federal government
What caused political parties to form?The conflict over the passage of the federal Constitution of 1787 saw the formation of the first political parties or factions. As focus switched from the formation of a new federal government to the issue of how powerful that federal government would be, tensions between them grew.
Note that up until 1800, the Federalists held sway, and afterward, the Republicans held sway. Both parties started out in national politics but quickly broadened their strategies to win over voters and supporters in every state. The Republican Party won over the planters and farmers, while the Federalists won over the commercial community.
Learn more about political parties from
https://brainly.com/question/25815264
#SPJ1
See full question below
Which of the following best explains the cause of the emergence of new political parties in the early nineteenth century?
A
Continued debates over the proper role of the federal government
B
Growing agreement regarding the issue of slavery
C
Declining support for westward territorial expansion
D
Persistent concern over the influence of foreign powers
explain how the u.s. involvement in global conflicts in the 20th century set the stage for domestic social changes
The United States' involvement in global conflicts during the 20th century, particularly World War I, World War II, and the Cold War, had significant impacts on domestic social changes within the country.
These conflicts helped reshape the American economy, politics, and society, setting the stage for major changes in civil rights, gender roles, and social welfare programs.
Firstly, U.S. participation in both World Wars led to an increased demand for wartime production, creating job opportunities for many Americans, including women and minorities. The need for labor in factories and the military draft of men opened the door for women to enter the workforce and take on roles previously dominated by men.
This shift in gender roles laid the foundation for the women's rights movement, pushing for greater equality and opportunities.
Secondly, the civil rights movement gained momentum as African Americans served in the military during these conflicts and began demanding equal rights and an end to segregation. The exposure to different cultures and ideas overseas also led many Americans to question the legitimacy of racial segregation at home.
Lastly, the Cold War further solidified the United States' global presence and the need for a strong military and intelligence network. This led to increased government spending and an expansion of social welfare programs, such as the GI Bill, which provided education and housing benefits to veterans.
Additionally, the fear of communism led to the Red Scare and McCarthyism, impacting domestic politics and creating a heightened sense of nationalism and conformity.
In conclusion, U.S. involvement in 20th-century global conflicts significantly influenced domestic social changes, such as shifting gender roles, the civil rights movement, and the expansion of social welfare programs. These conflicts contributed to the reshaping of American society and laid the groundwork for future developments in equality and social justice.
To know more about global conflicts refer here: https://brainly.com/question/27867966#
#SPJ11
What was Winston Churchill's main goal at the Yalta Conference? A) A free and democratic government for Poland B) The return of stolen artwork to France C) Reparation payments for damage during the war D) Granting a buffer zone to Stalin
Which of the following statements best describes Bushido?
Answer:
2 or b
Explanation:
Why did Black soldiers join the Union army at the Siege of Petersburg?
OA. They wanted to spy on the Union army.
OB. They wanted to fight to end slavery.
OC. They wanted to take land away from the Confederates.
D. They wanted to learn how to shoot guns.
O
Black soldiers joined the Union army at the Siege of Petersburg as They wanted to fight to end slavery. Option B
What is American Civil War?Generally, During the American Civil War, many Black soldiers joined the Union army in order to fight for their freedom and to end slavery. The Union army, which represented the Northern states and was also known as the Federal army, was fighting against the Confederate army, which represented the Southern states and sought to maintain slavery.
Black soldiers played a significant role in the Union army, and many were eager to join in order to contribute to the cause of ending slavery. They faced discrimination and segregation within the army, but they persevered and played a crucial role in the Union's victory over the Confederacy.
Read more about American Civil War
https://brainly.com/question/22808456
#SPJ1
Answer:b
Explanation:
why did martin luther's account of his break with the church change between 1517 and 1535? is one account more reliable than the other? ap world history
Martin Luther's account of his break with the church changed between 1517 and 1535 due to the circumstances under which they were written.
Luther's earlier accounts were written in the heat of the moment when he was dealing with the immediate consequences of his actions, while his later accounts were written after he had had time to reflect on his actions and consider their implications. Therefore, both accounts have their own validity and cannot be compared.There are several reasons why Martin Luther's account of his break with the church changed between 1517 and 1535.
One of the main reasons is that his earlier accounts were written in the heat of the moment when he was dealing with the immediate consequences of his actions, while his later accounts were written after he had had time to reflect on his actions and consider their implications. In addition, as time passed, Luther's views on various issues changed, and he was forced to clarify his position on many issues.
For example, his earlier views on the authority of the papacy and the sacraments were more radical than his later views, and he had to clarify his position on these issues in his later accounts. Therefore, both accounts have their own validity and cannot be compared. Each account represents a different point in Luther's intellectual and spiritual development, and each has its own historical value.
Learn more about Luther's Visit: brainly.com/question/885736
#SPJ11
How did Tiberius and Galus Gracchus attempt to improve the state of the Roman Republic?
Answer:
Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus were brothers who were Roman politicians and social reformers in the late 2nd century BCE. They attempted to improve the state of the Roman Republic by advocating for a series of political and social reforms that would benefit the common people (plebeians) at the expense of the aristocracy (patricians) and wealthy landowners.
Tiberius Gracchus was elected tribune of the plebs in 133 BCE and used his position to propose a land reform bill that would redistribute public land to landless peasants. This proposal was met with opposition from the patrician class, who controlled much of the public land and feared losing their power and influence. Tiberius circumvented the opposition by bypassing the Senate and submitting the bill directly to the popular assembly for a vote. The bill was passed and became known as the "Lex Sempronia Agraria."
Tiberius' younger brother Gaius Gracchus was elected tribune of the plebs ten years later in 123 BCE and continued his brother's work. He proposed a series of reforms that would increase the power of the popular assemblies, limit the power of the Senate, and provide grain at reduced prices to the urban poor. He also passed laws that would establish colonies for landless citizens and give citizenship to certain Italian allies of Rome.
The reforms of the Gracchi brothers were seen as radical and threatened the power and privilege of the aristocracy, leading to opposition and violence from their political opponents. Tiberius was killed in 133 BCE by a group of senators who opposed his land reform bill, and Gaius was also eventually killed in 121 BCE after a failed attempt to regain his political power. Nonetheless, their efforts were influential in the development of the Roman Republic and laid the groundwork for future reforms.
Explanation:
7. Why were the French and British determined to keep the forts in the Ohio Valley?
French
8. What happened when Washington tried to persuade the French to leave the Ohio Valley in 17533
British
9. What happened when Virginians made their way to the forks to build their trading post?
10. Why did the half-king decide to help Washington?
11. What was Fort Necessity?
Answer:
Explanation:
7.The French and British were determined to keep the forts in the Ohio Valley because they wanted to maintain control of the lucrative fur trade in the area. The forts also served as military bases, allowing the French and British to control the movement of Native Americans and other settlers in the region. By controlling the forts, the French and British were able to protect their interests in the region and prevent their rivals from establishing a foothold in the area.
8.In 1753, Washington was sent to the Ohio Valley by the British government to persuade the French to leave the area. However, the French refused and Washington was forced to return to Virginia empty-handed. This incident marked the beginning of the French and Indian War, which lasted until 1763 and resulted in the British gaining control over the area.
9.When Virginians made their way to the forks to build their trading post, they were met with hostility from the French and their Native American allies, who had already established a trading post at the forks. The Virginians were forced to retreat, and their trading post was never built.
10. The Half-King decided to help Washington because he saw Washington as a brave and honorable man. He also wanted to help the British in their fight against the French, and he believed that Washington could help him achieve this goal.
11. Fort Necessity was a fort built by George Washington in 1754 during the French and Indian War. It was the site of the first battle of the war, in which Washington and his troops were defeated by the French. The fort was later destroyed by the French, but its ruins still remain in Pennsylvania.
Do you think Lum May's statement is a credible source about the events of
November 3, 1885, in Tacoma? Explain why or why not.
According to the contents of the statement, Lum May's position can be considered as credible.
Why should Lum's Statement be Considered Credible?In the statement, Lum quoted Army General and other notable personalities such as General Sprague. He is also quoted as having made refenced to an incident that at least 1000 people witnessed.
This means that the statement is verifiable.
Another evidence of the authenticity of the statement is that it was accepted by the Department of State, under the National Archives and Records Administration. Hence, the authenticity of credibility of his assertions.
What is a credible source?A reputable source is free of bias and supported by evidence. It was authored by a reliable author or group. There are several sources available, and it might be difficult to determine what is reliable and what isn't at first look. Evaluating the reliability of sources is a critical information literacy skill.
Learn more about Credible Sources:
https://brainly.com/question/24266723
#SPJ1
Answer: i also need the answer
Explanation:
i need some milk or what you can help
Hindi nakakatulong to
Answer:
Ang alen ang di nakakatulong
In 1950, the chinese civil war concluded with the:
Answer:
establishment of two separate states claiming to be China's legitimate government.
Tibetans who claim to have journeyed to the afterlife are known as:
a. Calisorts
b. Delogs c. Bon Priests d. Jadu
Answer: B
Tibetans who claim to have journeyed to the afterlife are known as Delogs.
Which geographical process caused the Andes Mountains?
folding
lifting
erosion
earthquakes
Answer: 4
Explanation:
Answer:
earthquake caused the Andes mountains
Explanation:
actually the method is tectonic but it is also an earthquake. that is colliding of plates
can someone help me pls
Answer:
1- Charlemagne
Explanation:
Answer: Charlemagne
the catholic church
the pope known as the head of the catholic church
the plague killed somewhere between 30% and 60% of Europe's population between 1347 and 1351.
Explanation:
how does the dedication page with blanche of castile and king louis ix of france differ from early christian illustrated manuscripts?
it uses architectural frames instead of continuous narrative the dedication page with blanche of castile and king louis ix of france differ from early christian illustrated manuscripts.
There are several ways in which the dedication page featuring Blanche of Castile and King Louis IX of France is unique from early Christian illuminated manuscripts. First of all, as a page of dedication rather than an illustration of a religious text, it probably serves a different function. Second, the painting and illustration are probably in a different style, representing the local and historical creative traditions. It also has a diverse subject matter because it shows historical characters rather than religious ones or sceneries. Finally, the dedication page may have been designed for a particular audience, but illuminated manuscripts were frequently created for a larger, religious audience, suggesting that the two may have different purposes and intended audiences.
Learn more about illustrated manuscripts here:
https://brainly.com/question/30437729
#SPJ4
What does it mean for an essay to show bias?
Responses
The author used a variety of adjectives.
The author's opinions influenced their writing.
The author did not do any research.
The author lied about their experiences.
What it means for an essay to show bias is B,. The author's opinions influenced their writing.
What is Bias?This refers to the term that is used to describe and define the use of personal opinions and beliefs when writing that influences writing and may not always be factual.
Hence, it can be seen that the use of bias when writing has to do with the unethical use of personal viewpoint or perspective in order to write a story or make a narration as can be seen in option B.
Read more about bias here:
https://brainly.com/question/24491228
#SPJ1
In what way did Southern states try to gain more power during the Constitutional Convention? (5 points) a They wanted export taxes on northern goods to increase the balance of trade. b They tried to have slaves counted in their population to gain more votes in Congress. c They argued that the Southern states needed more economic support than Northern states. d They argued that their economic power should give them more representation in Congress.
Answer:
b) they tried to have slaves counted in their poputation to gain more votes in Congress
Explanation:
I just did the test
2. What American hero was
captured while on a spying
mission and hanged?
How did J.P. Morgan’s life differ from that of Andrew Carnegie?
Morgan's family was wealthy.
Morgan gave away a lot of money.
Morgan accumulated a fortune.
Morgan was a powerful businessman.
Answer:
JP Morgan came from a wealthy family, whereas Andrew Carnegie started out in a low-income situation. JP Morgan was born in the United States. He was sent to boarding schools, studied abroad in Switzerland in his teens, and then went to work for his father's bank early on. Andrew Carnegie was born in a one room weaver's cottage, and that was shared with another family. His family was starving when he moved to make progress to the United States. He worked as a bobbin boy for $1.20 a week. Carnegie worked hard in labor jobs for a good portion of his life and did not make his fortune in the steel industry until he entered his 50s. answer AAAA
Explanation:
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, which of the following
British Prime Ministers aimed to invigorate the British economy by
reducing the government's role in the economy?
Group of answer choices
Ther
Margaret Thatcher, British Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990, aimed to revitalize the British economy by reducing the government's role, conducting policies that included deregulation and privatisation, commonly referred to as 'Thatcherism'.
Explanation:The British Prime Minister during the late 1970s and early 1980s who aimed to invigorate the British economy by reducing the government's role in the economy was Margaret Thatcher. She was a member of the Conservative Party and her economic policies, known as Thatcherism, focused on deregulation, privatisation of state-owned companies and reducing the power of trade unions. These initiatives were a response to Britain's period of economic hardship, and aimed to transform the economy by promoting free-market economics.
Learn more about Margaret Thatcher here:https://brainly.com/question/35888877
#SPJ3
In the Patriot movie why does the British Colonel state he won't inherit his family's wealth?
Explanation:
Peaceful farmer Benjamin Martin is driven to lead the Colonial Militia during the American Revolution when a sadistic British officer murders his son.
How was the collapse of the russian empire different than the collapse of the austrian empire?
The collapse of the Russian Empire was different from the collapse of the Austrian Empire because the Russian Empire was overthrown in a revolution while the Austrian Empire collapsed due to a combination of external pressures and internal tensions.
The Russian Empire collapsed due to the loss of the Russo-Japanese War, military setbacks in World War I, and the February and October Revolutions of 1917. In February 1917, Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown in a popular revolution, and in October of that year, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seized power and established the Soviet Union.
The Austrian Empire, on the other hand, collapsed due to a combination of external pressures and internal tensions. It was weakened by military defeats in World War I and was forced to cede territories to neighboring countries.
Additionally, it was plagued by ethnic and nationalist tensions, as various groups within the empire sought greater autonomy or independence. These tensions eventually led to the collapse of the empire and the establishment of successor states such as Austria and Czechoslovakia.
To know more about Russian Empire:https://brainly.com/question/360740
#SPJ11
history need HELP please
Answer: Its A!!!! it collapsed
Explanation:
A. It collapsed and a new period began.