consumers in a country are concerned that cars they drive create too much air pollution, which response would most likely occur if the country had a free enterprise system?
a. the government would instruct car companies to stop selling cars that create pollution
b. businesses would compete by making new cars that produce less pollution
c. courts would order all car manufacturers to modify cars to reduce pollution
d. voters would select one company to produce cars that create less pollution

Answer:

should be 1. statements 2. witnesses 3. victims 4.trial

Explanation:

lots of law shows lol

The jail time and fines may vary for violating these environmental laws, and it depends on the severity and other things.

The amount of time someone would spend in jail and the fine they would receive for committing deforestation, eco-terrorism, abuse, OSHA violations, reckless endangerment, charity fraud, slander, illegal logging, assault, battery, pollution, and environmental laws would vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case.

The penalties for these crimes can range from a few months in jail to several years, and the fines can range from a few hundred dollars to several million dollars. In some cases, the offender may also be required to pay restitution to the victim or victims.

The specific penalties for each crime are set by federal or state law. For example, the penalties for deforestation and eco-terrorism are set by federal law, while the penalties for abuse, OSHA violations, reckless endangerment, charity fraud, slander, illegal logging, assault, battery, and pollution are set by state law.

Thus, punishment for these crimes varies as per the circumstances.

Learn more about environmental laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/30107873

#SPJ1

Answer:

A vision statement is a document that states the current and future objectives of an organization. The vision statement is intended as a guide to help the organization make decisions that align with its philosophy and declared set of goals.

Explanation:

i did this already so i know the answer

It is safe to assume that slavery would have persisted or taken a longer time to end if the court had declined to overturn the ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson during its decision in the brown v board of education.

In the aforementioned case, the Supreme Court declared that racial segregation of children in public schools violated the Constitution.

The "separate but equal" rule established in the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling in 1896 was subsequently overturned.

With this decision, racial segregation in American schools came to an end.

If the court had upheld Florida's statute in the Gideon v. Wainwright case, it would have set a precedent for other cases, and many people would have ended up in jail because they would not have been able to afford an attorney to defend them in court.

Because counsel could only be provided for a poor person accused with a deadly offense under Florida law, the trial judge rejected Gideon's request for a court-appointed attorney.

The trial judge denied Gideon's motion because Florida law only allowed the appointment of counsel for poor people facing capital charges.

Gideon, however, actually sent that letter; the court looked into his case; he was retried with the aid of an accomplished defense attorney; he was found not guilty; and after serving a two-year term for a crime he didn't commit, he was released from prison.

Due to the majority ruling in favor of Gideon by the Supreme Court in 1963, criminal defendants in federal and state courts now have the right to legal representation. following the decision.

Learn more about brown v board of education: https://brainly.com/question/14637388

#SPJ13

The "three strikes" laws is based on an erroneous assumption that habitual offenders will understand that if they commit a third offence, they will be sentenced to life imprisonment.

Three strikes laws refers to that person convicted of a crime who has been convicted of two or more crimes that were committed on prior and their separate occasions shall be sentenced to a term of life imprisonment by the court, with no eligibility for parole.

This laws should be aim to reduce a violent crime & address individuals whose conduct have not been deterred by one or more conventional approaches to punishment, which has been subject to constitutional challenges.

However, individuals who commit felony do not think about what will happen to them when getting caught, these offenders learn about their exposure after the have already committed the crime.

To learn more about the Three strikes laws, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9040163

#SPJ1

Answer:

OB. Drivers may not make the maneuver shown on the sign

Explanation:

This is the universal "no" sign. So don't do anything that has a red arrow shown diagonally presented in a circle.

For eg, no smoking, no left turns, or no photography permitted as shown in picture below.

Answer:

મને ખબર નથી માફ કરશો

Explanation:

Answer:

Over three years, a law student can expect to pay anywhere from $87,222 (in-state, public school) to $153,804 (private school) and up

Explanation:

Answer:

The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:

They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.

It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.

A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.

The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.

The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.

A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

https://brainly.com/question/32247683

#SPJ12

Answer:

There are a few ways to investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases. One way is to read summaries of the cases from a variety of sources, including newspapers, legal journals, and online news sources. Another way is to read the full text of the Supreme Court opinion, which is available online on the court's website. Finally, it is also possible to watch or listen to audio recordings of the oral arguments in the case, which are also available on the court's website.

Collaboration is not an element of a crime. Collaboration refers to working together and is not directly related to the essential components of a crime. Therefore, option C is correct.

The elements of a crime typically consist of four key components.

Learn  more about elements of crime here:

https://brainly.com/question/11221577

#SPJ6

Answer:

I am not 100% sure but I think it is C. A famous actress who is on her way to the airport.

Explanation:

Radical criminology basiclly means someone using their power to control the working class and not the ruling class so out of all of them its probably the actress.

After reading the situation given above, the officer Barnes can award a speeding ticket under the principle theory of radical criminology to a famous actress who is on her to the airport. Therefore, the option C holds true.  

Radical criminology can be referred to or considered as the theory that is based on the concept of not taking the entire society as a whole into consideration for determining the criminal liability of an individual. This is done to ensure who is better criminal out of the instances in front.

In the examples above, the officer Barnes must award a speeding ticket to a famous actress because the others are either having less knowledge, or have a deadline to meet.

Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of radical criminology.

Learn more about radical criminology here:

https://brainly.com/question/22696883

#SPJ2

Answer:

_Explanation

Explanation:

You should shop around for renters insurance about two weeks or so before your current policy is set to end or renew to give yourself time to make an informed decision. In general, it's recommended that you shop for insurance quotes every six months for long-lasting policies like car and home insurance.

Answer:

As you can see, the areas covered by the police background investigation deal with all spheres of your life. There are many things that are considered a serious disqualifier and will prevent you from taking the job of a law enforcement officer. Here is a list of the most common disqualifiers included in the police background check:

Felony convictions

Serious misdemeanors

Current drug use or past drug abuse

Dishonorable discharge from military service

Bad credit history

History of domestic violence

Not clean driving license

Unreported past crimes

Past or current gang affiliations

Poor employment record

Incorrect, false or incomplete information given on the application form

Explanation:

Answer:

Judicial independence is important because it guarantees that judges are free to decide honestly and impartially, in accordance with the law and evidence, without concern or fear of interference, control, or improper influence from anyone.

Explanation:

Answer:

Full Answer below. V

Explanation:

Proceed to go through the intersection without stopping, then come to a complete stop before proceeding. Instructions given by Law Enforcement officers directing traffic override posted traffic signals and signs.

1. The basis for a divorce is irreconcilable differences.

2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of best interests of the child.

3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony.

4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage.

5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family.

6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se and not pay legal fees.

1. The basis for a collaborative divorce is the mutual agreement between the divorcing parties to work together in resolving their issues amicably and without litigation.

2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of the best interests of the child, considering factors such as the child's welfare, stability, and relationship with each parent.

3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony by facilitating communication, negotiation, and finding mutually agreeable solutions.

4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage by providing therapy, counseling, and guidance to improve communication, understanding, and relationship dynamics.

5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family, where both partners bring their own children from previous relationships into the new family unit.

6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se, meaning they represent themselves in the legal process, without hiring an attorney. This option allows them to save on legal fees but requires them to navigate the legal proceedings and paperwork on their own.

Know more about the judge here:
https://brainly.com/question/30455267

#SPJ8

The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:

Directions: Fill in the blanks with the correct answer from the list below. Some terms be used more than once.

1 alimony

2 best interests of the child

3 blended family

4 child custody

5 child support

6 collaborative divorce

7 community property

8 covenant divorce

9 divorce

10 in loco parentis

11 irreconcilable differences

12-joint custody

13 kinship care

14 legal fees

15 marriage counselor

16 mediator

17 no-fault divorce

18 pro se

19 property division

20 separate property

21 Separation

22 stepparent

23 tender years doctrine

1. The basis for a ____ is ____

2. When a judge decides the issue of _____ the judge uses the standard of _____

3. A _____ helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of ___, ___, ____ and ____

4. A ____ helps married couples resolve the problems in their marriage.

5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a _______

6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go _____ and not pay_____ .

The chart above shows that when it comes to those who vote Democrat, D. women were more likely to support Democratic candidates than men.

From the chart we see that:

The graph shows that women prefer to vote democrat and this is most likely because of the liberal policies of the Democratic party in supporting the rights of minorities.

In conclusion, more women vote democrat than men do.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/24970316.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

100%

Local, state, and federal responsibilities of residents can be divided into these three groups are the mandatory.

Following the law, paying taxes, serving on juries, attending school, maintaining the law, and defending the United States are just a few of the obligations that all citizens must fulfil.

Voting, expressing thoughts and comments, performing community service, and appreciating diversity are some optional duties of citizens. If citizens are expected to fulfil both mandatory and optional duties at the local, state, and federal levels, such as abiding by the law, paying taxes, and serving on juries.

Learn more about on mandatory, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14485615

#SPJ1

Answer: In this scenario, Mr. Peters may argue that he acted in self-defense. Self-defense is a legal defense that allows an individual to use reasonable force in order to protect themselves from an imminent threat of harm. However, whether Mr. Peters's actions were reasonable under the circumstances could be debated.

A key factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters had a reasonable belief that Takeshi posed an imminent threat of harm to him. Mr. Peters may argue that he was scared and believed that Takeshi was an intruder, based on the fact that Takeshi was yelling and waving his arms. However, the fact that Takeshi did not understand English, and was not responding to Mr. Peters's commands may indicate that Mr. Peters should have realized that Takeshi was not an immediate threat.

Another important factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters's use of deadly force was reasonable under the circumstances. In this case, it could be argued that shooting Takeshi was not a reasonable response, as there may have been other options that Mr. Peters could have taken to protect himself, such as calling the police or using non-lethal force.

In general, whether Mr. Peters has a defense will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, and how these facts are presented and evaluated in court.

Explanation:

Answer:

the view that the Court's interpretation of the Constitution needs to change with the times

Explanation:

A family is any two or more people who live together and are connected by blood, marriage, or adoption; all of these people are regarded as belonging to the same family.

Families have a key role in social development as the fundamental and indispensable building blocks of society. They are primarily responsible for the upbringing, education, and socialization of children as well as for teaching civic virtues and a sense of community.

Family supports us during both the best and worst of times, which makes these ties crucial. Family is crucial because it can provide unconditional love, support, and stability. They always strive to see and bring out the best in you, even when you are unable to do so for yourself.

Learn more about a family here:

https://brainly.com/question/10205802

#SPJ1

Answer:

Dsdseder

Explanationddddd:

Law is a dying trade

Answer: D. are used in almost all aspects of work

Explanation:

Answer:

is that an essay

Explanation:

Answer:

Go To Collage Get A Good Job.

Explanation: