Answer:
Explanation: Democracy and authoritarian governments are fundamentally different forms of governance. In a democracy, power is held by the people, who exercise their power either directly or through elected representatives. This is in contrast to an authoritarian government, where power is held by a small group of individuals who wield their power in a more oppressive and controlling manner.
One key difference between the two types of government is the level of individual freedom and liberty. In a democracy, individuals are typically afforded a wide range of civil liberties, including the freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. In an authoritarian government, these rights are often restricted or non-existent.
Another difference between the two is the role of the rule of law. In a democracy, the rule of law is upheld and all individuals, regardless of their position or power, are subject to the same laws. In an authoritarian government, the rule of law may be disregarded and individuals may be subject to the arbitrary and often oppressive rule of those in power.
In a democracy, elections are typically held regularly and are free and fair, allowing for the peaceful transfer of power. In an authoritarian government, elections, if they are held at all, may be rigged or otherwise manipulated to ensure the continuation of the ruling party or individual.
Overall, while both democracy and authoritarianism are forms of governance, they are fundamentally different in their approach to power, individual rights, and the rule of law.
Which of the following leaders and groups disagreed about the French Revolution?
Answer:
It is unclear which leaders and groups are being referred to in the question. The French Revolution was a complex and multifaceted event that generated a wide range of opinions and reactions from different individuals and groups, both within France and abroad.
In general, there were a variety of viewpoints on the French Revolution, ranging from enthusiastic support to vehement opposition. Some individuals and groups saw the French Revolution as a positive development that would bring about greater freedom, equality, and democracy, while others viewed it as a dangerous and destabilizing force that threatened traditional social and political structures.
Some notable leaders and groups that had differing views on the French Revolution include:
- Conservatives: Many conservative leaders and groups in Europe, including monarchs, aristocrats, and the Catholic Church, opposed the French Revolution and saw it as a threat to their power and authority. They were concerned about the revolutionary ideas of equality, liberty, and democracy spreading to their own countries and disrupting the social order.
- Radicals: On the other hand, some radical leaders and groups, both within and outside of France, supported the French Revolution and saw it as a model for achieving political change and social justice. They were inspired by the revolutionary slogans of "liberty, equality, and fraternity" and believed that the French Revolution represented a major step forward for human rights.
- Moderates: There were also many moderate leaders and groups that had mixed or ambivalent views on the French Revolution. They recognized the need for political reform and greater social justice, but were concerned about the violence and instability that characterized much of the revolutionary period. Some moderates supported certain aspects of the French Revolution, such as the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, while opposing others, such as the Reign of Terror.
Overall, the French Revolution was a highly divisive and controversial event that generated a wide range of opinions and reactions from different individuals and groups.
Should all members of the nazi party be held responsible for the holocaust or just nazi leader?
Considering the postwar housing shortage, what methods did William Levitt use to alleviate the crisis?
Levitt divided the process of building a house into 26 distinct steps. Teams of construction workers paved streets, laid concrete slabs, and leveled the ground.
Briefing:-Plumbing and electrical cable were installed, and trees were planted every 28 feet. At a time, one hundred homes were constructed. Clockwork controlled the construction process.
William Levitt revolutionized the housing sector in what ways?By offering affordable homes outside of the city, William Levitt transformed American living and helped usher in the period of suburbia. Many white Americans fled to suburbia due to racial anxieties, affordable housing, and a desire to abandon run-down cities.
What methodology did William Levitt create?Levitt's innovative planning and top-notch control techniques transformed the home construction process. These methods made it possible to offer modestly priced, aesthetically pleasing single-unit dwelling to common people, individuals who had never considered themselves middle class before.
To Know more about individuals
https://brainly.com/question/19537863
#SPJ1
Why did the great compromise and the three fifths comprise involve so much debate and discussion at the constitutional convention
Answer:
Why did the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion? The states were not ready to give up all of their independence. The states believed the Articles of Confederation were adequate. Each state was certain that cooperation would lead to mutiny.
Think about what you have learned about union
activities in the 1800s. How did strikes benefit
what unions wanted to achieve? List at least two
arguments in support of the use of strikes.
DONE ✔
Employees use union strikes to air their grievances with the company. Labour strikes benefit union goals because they are heard by management when they take to the streets.
The union's goals as well as company grievances will be revealed as a result of media coverage. Union strikes assist management in reevaluating salary rates, and both management and employees can agree on suitable and fair wage rates through negotiation and compromise. Wage disparities will be reduced. Union employees will also negotiate incentives and benefits that will benefit the entire workforce.
Due to a societal belief in Social Darwinism, American workers had few, when any, legal protections during the Second Industrial Revolution. To combat this, workers began to form unions, such as the American Federation of Labour, to bargain in their behalf, despite opposition from corporations and business owners.
Learn more about Union, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31678862
#SPJ1
Why were the Muslims able to make such great contributions, or how did these contributions impact the world?
Muslims, from an early time, were taught about the importance of reading and writing. As this was the only way they could read and understand the Quran.
Who are the Muslims?Muslims are people who adhere to Islam, a monotheistic religion belonging to the Abrahamic tradition. They consider the Quran, the foundational religious text of Islam, to be the verbatim word of the God of Abraham or Allah as it was revealed to Muhammad, the main Islamic prophet. The majority of Muslims also follow the teachings and practices of Muhammad's sunnah as recorded in traditional accounts of hadith.
With an estimated population of almost 1.9 billion followers as of the 2020 year estimation, Muslims comprise more than 24.9% of the world's total population.
Learn more about Muslims, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4681522
#SPJ1
What can you infer about Europe from this map?
Answer:
with the map I can anwser this sorry!
Explanation:
according to dr. lee strobel, historical truth is not relevant or important to christianity. True or false?
according to dr. lee strobel, historical truth is not relevant or important to christianity. False.
The statement is false. Historical truth is indeed relevant and important to Christianity. Christianity is founded on the belief in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, which are events rooted in history. The historical accuracy of these events is crucial to the foundational claims of Christianity.
Christianity asserts that Jesus Christ was a historical figure who lived in first-century Palestine, performed miracles, taught profound spiritual truths, and ultimately died on a cross for the redemption of humanity. The resurrection of Jesus, as a historical event, is considered central to Christian faith and is believed to validate the claims of Jesus as the Son of God and the source of salvation.
Many Christian scholars, theologians, and historians have devoted themselves to studying and researching the historical aspects of Christianity. They examine ancient texts, archaeological evidence, and historical context to better understand the life of Jesus and the early Christian movement.
While faith and personal belief play a significant role in Christianity, historical truth is still considered important to substantiate and support the faith. The study of historical evidence and the pursuit of historical truth help to provide a solid foundation for the Christian faith and its claims about Jesus and the events surrounding his life.
Therefore, it is incorrect to state that historical truth is not relevant or important to Christianity. On the contrary, historical truth is integral to the understanding and practice of the Christian faith.
To know more about Christian movement., click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10323175
#SPJ11
1. Identify a problem today that is caused by people having too much liberty
2. Identify one situation today where the pursuit of order has infringed on American liberties
3. Give your opinion on whether American society today has too much liberty or too much order.
One problem today that is caused by people having too much liberty is the spread of misinformation and fake news. Social media platforms and the internet, in general, have made it easy for people to share information without fact-checking or considering the consequences of their actions.
This has led to the spread of false information, which can have serious consequences, such as people making decisions based on false information or not taking necessary precautions because they believe the misinformation.
One situation today where the pursuit of order has infringed on American liberties is the controversy surrounding government surveillance and privacy.
The government has implemented various measures to monitor and collect data on citizens in the name of national security, such as the Patriot Act and the NSA's surveillance program. However, these measures have been criticized for infringing on people's right to privacy and civil liberties, as they allow the government to collect personal information without a warrant or probable cause.
To know more about internet visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13308791
#SPJ11
How does the North Korean government resist change?
Answer:
They cut off communication with the rest of the world, and isolate. The citizens are not exposed to other peoples, and are mostly fed information by the government. If they don't think anything is wrong, then nothing will change.
Explanation:
ANSWER PLZ! I will mark as brainliest
Answer:
Correct me if im wrong, but i am quite certain it is true
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Everything is true, but they forgot to include Delaware.
What are two similarities shared by mining and oil drilling in Kansas
Answer:
Explanation:
Mining and oil drilling in Kansas are both extraction processes that involve the removal of natural resources from the ground. Two similarities they share are:
Both mining and oil drilling can have significant environmental impacts, including land degradation, soil erosion, and contamination of water resources. The extraction process can also disrupt natural habitats and cause air pollution.
Both mining and oil drilling in Kansas can provide economic benefits to the state, including job creation, revenue generation, and increased energy independence. The extracted resources can be used to fuel the state's industries and power its homes and businesses.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
How did the middle colonies differ from the others regarding the ancestry of its settlers?
Answer:
The Middle Colonies were more diverse than colonies in New England and the South. Most of the early settlers depended on the fur trade and on farming for economic survival. ... The Middle Colonies were settled by different nationalities so there is greater emphasis on religious toleration and cultural diversity.
Explanation:hope this helped
who controlled palestine/israel from the sixteenth century until the world war i?
From the sixteenth century until World War I, Palestine/Israel was controlled by the Ottoman Empire.
For over four centuries, Palestine/Israel was under the control of the Ottoman Empire. Beginning in the sixteenth century, the Ottoman Empire's influence in the region grew steadily until the end of World War I, when it lost control of Palestine/Israel to the British.
This marked the beginning of a tumultuous period of history for the region that has continued to the present day. Although the political and social dynamics of Palestine/Israel have changed significantly since the end of Ottoman rule, the period from the sixteenth century until the end of World War I will always be remembered as a time of Ottoman influence in the region.
To know more about Palestine, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/2826069
#SPJ4
Which number on the map indicates New Orleans?
1
2
3
4
HELP FAST
Answer:
4
Explanation:
New Orleans is in Louisiana
Answer:
The person above me is correct. I got this answer correct. New Orleans is 4.
Explanation:
Please help!
ANSWER ALL 3 PLEASE!
Answer:
5. A
2. 4 or 1
3. A
Answer:
For question 5, the answer is Adaptations.
Explanation:
Adaptations increase an organism's ability to survive and reproduce.
Answer:
For the next question, the answer is the last one (organisms with favorable traits best fit for the environment survive and reproduce to pass on those traits).
Explanation:
Natural Selection is the process that results in the survival and reproductive success of individuals or groups best adjusted to their environment.
Answer:
For the last question, the answer is the first one (both structural and behavioral).
The Populist Party supported the Gold Bugs over the Silverites. True or False?
It is false that The Populist Party supported the Gold Bugs over the Silverites.
The Populist Party, also known as the People's Party, was a political party in the United States during the late 19th century. The Populists were generally supportive of the "Silverites" rather than the "Gold Bugs" in the debate over the monetary standard.
During this period, there was a heated political debate over the currency standard that the United States should adopt. The "Silverites" advocated for the unlimited coinage of silver as a way to increase the money supply and promote inflation, which they believed would help farmers and debtors by making it easier to repay loans. On the other hand, the "Gold Bugs" favored maintaining the gold standard, which limited the money supply and was generally more supportive of the interests of creditors and the financial industry.
The Populist Party aligned itself with the interests of farmers and rural communities and was a strong proponent of the free coinage of silver. They saw silver as a way to alleviate the economic hardships faced by farmers and debtors. Therefore, the Populists were supportive of the Silverites and their push for silver coinage.
To know more about Populist Party:
https://brainly.com/question/43177
#SPJ2
This map shows the provinces and states controlled by
one imperialist nation in the 1800s and 1900s.
which nation controlled the shaded territories on the
map?
france
0 great britain
o japat
0 china
The imperialist country that controlled the shaded territories in this map is the Great Britain.
What is imperialism?This refers to the taking over of the resources that are contained in a foreign nation by another nation.
Because the Great Britain want to exploit resources for economic gains,they went to imperialism in the Asia to have control in the political and economical sector of the area.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about imperialism
brainly.com/question/884452
#SPJ1
What were the two political parties that came to power following WWI in China?
Answer:
The two political parties following ww2 in china are the (KMT) and the current party in power the (CCP)
Answer:
give the other dude brainliest
Explanation:
ahahah kill it at ur fb gameee dudeee
ily ugly
John calvin was arguably more influential in the spread of protestantism than martin luther. what were his core beliefs? on what areas did he agree with luther? where did he disagree with luther?
John Calvin's core beliefs include predestination, salvation by faith alone, and biblical authority. He agreed with Luther on his rejection of papal authority but disagreed on the nature of the Eucharist.
John Calvin, a key figure in the Protestant Reformation, had core beliefs that revolved around the concept of predestination, biblical authority, and the idea of salvation by faith alone. Calvin and Luther agreed on important theological aspects such as the rejection of papal authority, emphasis on Scripture as the supreme authority, and belief in salvation by faith.
However, they disagree on the nature of the Eucharist, especially the concept of Christ's presence. Calvin advocates symbolic presence, while Luther believes in a more literal presence known as oneness.
Learn more about predestination:
https://brainly.com/question/18460867
#SPJ4
Question 13 of 20
How did the Industrial Revolution change working conditions for people?
A. There was very little need for skilled labor.
B. Workers began to earn more money.
C. Owners were able to train more workers.
D. Machines made it necessary to hire more workers.
SUBMIT
Alberti was very impressed by what aspect of brunelleschi's contribution to the florence cathedral?
Alberti was very impressed aspect of Innovative techniques of dome construction used in Brunelleschi's contribution to the Florence cathedral .
Leon Battista Alberti was an Italian Renaissance humanist author, artist, architect, poet, priest, linguist, philosopher, and cryptographer who exemplified the characteristics of those now known as polymaths. He is regarded as the father of Western cryptography.
Filippo Brunelleschi was an Italian architect, designer, and sculptor who is now recognized as the first modern engineer, planner, and sole construction supervisor.
Filippo Brunelleschi is best known for designing the dome of Florence's Duomo, but he was also a gifted artist. He is said to have rediscovered the principles of linear perspective.
To know more about Filippo Brunelleschi here
https://brainly.com/question/6847572
#SPJ4
How did the depression impact workers who were able to keep their jobs? How was this similar to and different from the impact on workers who lost their jobs?
Answer:
How were workers affected by the Great Depression?
A labor market analysis of the Great Depression finds that many workers were unemployed for much longer than one year. Of those fortunate to have jobs, many experienced cutbacks in hours (i.e., involuntary part-time employment). Men typically were more adversely affected than women.
How did the depression impact workers who were able to keep their jobs? ... The depression caused workers to live in fear and many had their hours or wages cut. They brought home paychecks that were 10, 20, sometimes 30 percent less than their pre-depression checks.
which warning in washington’s farewell address influenced presidents throughout the 19th century?
A final address was composed by George Washington and Alexander Hamilton. The nation's first president urged the people to maintain their unity, fight the emergence of political groups, and stay away from foreign influences.
George Washington, who was 64 years old and approaching the conclusion of his second term, was afflicted with both physical and political problems in 1796. The former Revolutionary War commander made the decision not to run for a third term in the nation's highest position because he was suffering from painful dentures and rheumatism, as well as escalating attacks from opponents of his ideas. He wrote a farewell speech with his old friend and mentee, Alexander Hamilton, as he did so. A two-term restriction was not applicable to Washington. However, he feared that if he passed away while in office, it would set a precedent that the president was a lifetime appointment. Instead, he made way for a replacement in order to demonstrate to future generations his dedication to democracy rather than power.
learn more about George Washington here:
https://brainly.com/question/4953122
#SPJ4
what important lesson did the british learn from their experience in the battle on breed's hill?
The important lesson that the British learned from their experience in the Battle of Breed's Hill, also known as the Battle of Bunker Hill, was the need for better planning and adaptability in the face of strong colonial resistance.
This battle demonstrated the determination and resilience of the American colonists, who were able to inflict significant casualties on the British forces despite being outnumbered and inadequately supplied. The British realized that they could not underestimate the colonists' military capabilities and that they needed to approach future battles with more caution and better strategies. This led to a reevaluation of their tactics and the implementation of more flexible approaches to deal with the growing colonial resistance. In summary, the Battle on Breed's Hill taught the British the importance of not underestimating their opponents and the need for improved planning and adaptability in their military campaigns.
To know more about Breed's Hill.
https://brainly.com/question/11562972
#SPJ11
What did the Europeans have to do at the end of each trading season?
Answer:
To sell all the goods and buy necessary items.
Explanation:
The Europeans have to sell all the goods and buy the necessary materials that is needed in the family as well as for the next trading season at the end of each trading season. The ending of trading season provides resting time for the traders to collect and produce new products for the coming new season. This period of time the traders spend their time in their houses with family and producing new items so that they can sold it in the coming trading seaason.
a bias against the study of indigenous religions up until the twentieth century was
A bias against the study of indigenous religions existed up until the twentieth century. This was mainly because people of European ancestry, who had colonized the globe, regarded their own religions and cultural values as superior to those of the people they conquered. As a result, they viewed the indigenous religions of the conquered people as primitive and barbaric.
In addition, the academic study of religion had, until recently, been primarily a branch of theology that was concerned with the development of the major world religions, particularly Christianity. As a result, indigenous religions were not seen as a legitimate field of study, and there was little interest in exploring them.
In recent years, however, there has been a growing interest in the study of indigenous religions, and scholars are now beginning to appreciate their importance and significance. This has been driven in part by the recognition of the role that these religions have played in shaping the cultures and societies of the indigenous peoples who practice them, as well as their influence on the development of the world's religions as a whole. As a result, indigenous religions are now being studied and explored in greater depth, and they are being given the respect and attention that they deserve.
To know more about academic study visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21139792
#SPJ11
should the impact european contact had on indigenous populations of north america be addressed as a historical or moral question?
The impact that European contact had on indigenous populations of North America can be addressed as both a historical and a moral question.
As a historical question, it involves examining the facts and circumstances surrounding the interactions between European settlers and indigenous peoples, and the resulting changes in the social, economic, and political landscape of North America.
This includes analyzing the causes and consequences of European colonization, the displacement of indigenous peoples, and the cultural, linguistic, and religious changes that occurred.
As a moral question, it involves considering the ethical and moral implications of the treatment of indigenous peoples by European settlers. This includes examining issues such as the violation of human rights, forced assimilation, genocide, and cultural destruction.
It also involves considering the impact of these actions on future generations and the ongoing legacy of colonization and its effects on indigenous communities.
Both historical and moral perspectives are important in understanding the impact of European contact on indigenous populations of North America. By examining the historical facts and events surrounding colonization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the context and consequences of these interactions.
By considering the moral implications of these actions, we can acknowledge and address the injustices that were committed and work towards reconciliation and healing.
To know more about moral question refer to-
brainly.com/question/29788577#
#SPJ11
one specific example of a trait that totalitarian dictators have in common. How and why is this an important characteristic for dictators?
Explain the 2020 pandemic in three lines.