A conservative judge appointed to the Supreme Court by a Republican president is most likely to become more liberal if __________.
A. a Democrat becomes the next president B. the Court already has a majority of conservatives
C. public opinion is more liberal than his or her own views D. he or she begins to worry that the Court’s decisions are too narrow

Answer:

the answer is a.

Explanation:

cuz you still arent 100 pecent paying attwntion

Answer:

A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person

Explanation:

While under the influence, you're not fully conscious or aware of your surroundings. That being said, driving is a task that acquires the driver to be conscious and to have awareness for their safety and the other driver's safety. If the driver is intoxicated, they risk a collision and killing people if the collison is deadly.

There are a lot of databases that can be used to investigate a particular case, but the four that are most commonly used are the Criminal Justice Abstracts, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, JSTOR, and ProQuest.

These databases are useful for a variety of reasons. Let us take a look at each of these databases and what they offer:

1. Criminal Justice Abstracts

The Criminal Justice Abstracts is a database that is designed to help researchers find scholarly articles, reports, books, and more on topics related to criminal justice.

2. National Criminal Justice Reference Service

The National Criminal Justice Reference Service is a comprehensive database that provides access to resources related to criminal justice.

3. JSTOR

JSTOR is a database that provides access to academic articles, books, and other resources on a variety of topics.

4. ProQuest

ProQuest is a database that provides access to a variety of scholarly resources, including academic articles, books, and more.

In conclusion, these databases are all useful resources for those who are investigating a particular case. They provide access to a wide range of materials that can be used to support research and analysis.

To know more about databases visit :

https://brainly.com/question/6447559

#SPJ11

The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.

The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.

Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.

To know more about Nixon's  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1131063

#SPJ11

Answer:

The original purpose of Florida's "castle law," officially known as the "Stand Your Ground" law, was to expand the rights of individuals to use deadly force in self-defense. The law was enacted in 2005 and allows individuals to use deadly force to defend themselves without the obligation to retreat first. It also extends this right of self-defense to situations where the individual is not in their home, but in a place where they have a legal right to be, such as their car or workplace.

The law was controversial from the beginning, with critics arguing that it could lead to an increase in gun violence and disproportionate harm to marginalized communities. The law gained national attention in 2012 after the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed Black teenager, by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer who claimed self-defense under the law. The case ignited a national debate about the law's merits and flaws and sparked protests and calls for reform.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

I thank the best one would be to prevent others from using it dishonestly

Explanation:

if someone uses your information it not just hurt you but the people around you its safe to keep your personal information personal

Answer:

B

Explanation:

ed2020

Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.

A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:

Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.

Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.

Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.

Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.

Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.

Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.

learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996

#SPJ1

Answer:

what question do you want to ask ?

Stop immediately: It is important to stop the vehicle immediately and move it off the road if possible to avoid further accidents.

Check for injuries: Check yourself, passengers, pedestrians, and occupants of other vehicles involved in the accident for injuries. If anyone is injured, call for medical assistance immediately. police: Contact the police and report the accident. They will provide instructions on what to do next and may file a police report.

Exchange information: Exchange contact and insurance information with the other driver(s) involved in the accident. Get their name, address, phone number, and insurance company information.

Gather evidence: Take photographs of the damage to all vehicles involved and the accident scene. Collect eyewitness accounts if available.

Cooperate with the authorities: Answer all questions from the police and provide all the necessary information they require. Avoid admitting fault or making any statements that could be used against you later.

learn more about evidence here :

https://brainly.com/question/15880833

#SPJ11

A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is considered illegal and void. This means that the contract is not legally binding and cannot be enforced by either party.

It is important to note that the illegality of the contract must be related to the purpose of the contract, rather than incidental or minor violations of the law. For example, a contract to sell illegal drugs would be illegal and void, but a contract to sell a car where one party happened to be driving without a license would likely still be enforceable. It is not possible for the contract to be enforceable as a quasi-contract, as quasi-contracts arise when there is no actual contract in place but one party has received unjust enrichment at the expense of the other. In the case of an illegal contract, there is no valid contract, to begin with.

The contract is also not simply voidable, which would mean that one party has the option to void or cancel the contract at their discretion. Instead, the contract is considered illegal and void, meaning that it is null and void from the outset and cannot be ratified or enforced.

Finally, the contract is not dischargeable, as discharge typically refers to the release of a party from their obligations under a contract. In the case of an illegal contract, there are no valid obligations, to begin with, so discharge is not applicable.

In summary, a contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void, which means it is not enforceable and has no legal effect. This is a detailed answer to your question that provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal implications of an illegal contract.

Learn more about quasi-contract

https://brainly.com/question/29651556

#SPJ11

A contract that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract opposes public policy and societal interests. Additionally, if any contract limits competition and encourages illegal activities, it also falls under such a category.

A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract is not enforceable, as it opposes public policy and societal interests. Generally, a legal system must enforce contracts to ensure economic transactions and growth. However, if a contract encourages illegal activities, this opposes the purpose of law and justice, therefore, it falls into the category of an unlawful contract.

Consider this example for a clearer understanding: If a large retailer obtained the exclusive rights to be the only distributor of televisions, computers, and audio equipment made by various companies, then, this exclusive contract despite potentially being legal, may limit competition and hence, it would have an anticompetitive effect and could be ruled as unlawful.

https://brainly.com/question/33763152

#SPJ6

The U.S. Congress consists of two chambers, the House and the Senate, whereas the British Parliament is a single body.

1. The U.S. Congress: The United States Congress is composed of two separate chambers - the House of Representatives and the Senate. This bicameral structure ensures checks and balances within the legislative branch of the U.S. government.

The House of Representatives is based on the population of each state, with each state having a varying number of representatives. The Senate, on the other hand, consists of two senators from each state, regardless of the state's population size.

2. The British Parliament: The British Parliament, also known as the Westminster Parliament, operates as a unicameral body. It comprises the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

The House of Commons is elected by the public, while the House of Lords is composed of appointed members, including life peers, bishops, and hereditary peers.

3. Taxation Matters: While the U.S. Congress has the authority to address all aspects of legislation, the British Parliament primarily deals with matters of legislation, including taxation. Tax-related decisions, such as introducing or amending taxes, fall under the jurisdiction of the Parliament.

4. Government Ministers and Parliament: In the British system, government ministers can simultaneously hold office and be members of the Parliament. This allows ministers to actively participate in legislative debates and decision-making processes. In contrast, members of the U.S. Congress cannot hold cabinet positions in the executive branch simultaneously.

5. Judicial Authority: The British courts do not possess the power to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional or against the constitution. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty in the United Kingdom affirms that Parliament is the supreme legal authority, and its acts cannot be overturned by the judiciary based on constitutionality alone.

In summary, while both the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament are legislative bodies, they differ in their structure, taxation matters, the involvement of government ministers, and the judicial authority to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional.

For more such questions on British Parliament, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30792867

#SPJ8

The employer payroll tax owed on Mary's salary of $50,000 in 2019 is determined by a combination of federal and state taxes. For federal taxes, Social Security and Medicare taxes are due at a rate of 7.65%, with each tax being split between the employer and employee.

The employer is responsible for paying 6.2% of Social Security taxes and 1.45% of Medicare taxes, totaling 7.65%. Additionally, the employer must pay federal unemployment taxes at a rate of 6.0%, with no money being paid by the employee.

At the state level, the employer is responsible for paying state unemployment taxes, which vary from state to state. The employer is also responsible for any applicable state income taxes, which are generally a percentage of the employee's wages.

For example, in the state of California, the employer must pay 6.2% of the employee's wages for state disability insurance and 1.45% for state unemployment insurance.

In total, the employer payroll tax owed on Mary's salary of $50,000 in 2019 is approximately 15.3%. This amount can vary slightly depending on the state in which Mary resides.

Know more about Social Security taxes here

https://brainly.com/question/18268724#

#SPJ11

Answer:

which language is this?

National party conventions are held.

Candidates announce they are running for their party's nomination

Voters participate in primaries or caucuses.

Voters participate in the general election.

The Electoral College votes.

The candidate with the majority of the votes wins the presidency.

An example of a system where an executive president is indirectly elected is the United States Electoral College, which has electors from each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. The electors, who formally select the president through the electoral college, are determined by the public's votes.

Although the phrase "Electoral College" does not appear in the U.S. Constitution, it is how we refer to the procedure by which the United States elects the President. The Vice-President and the President are chosen by the States, which also include the District of Columbia for this procedure.

Learn more about the Electoral College here:

https://brainly.com/question/25375266

#SPJ1

Answer:

i agree im abit of an artist

Answer:

The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous.

Explanation:

Precedents in the courts of law are previously established cases whose judgements can be referenced in successive case. In the case above, Linda is the defendant because the burden of proof lies on her. She needs to put up a defense to contest the accuracy of her lawsuit.

When the lawyer tells her that precedent supports her defense, it means that previously established cases on that matter support Linda's case. Therefore, Heidi's lawsuit against Linda was frivolous and lacked merit. Linda has a high chance of winning the case.

Answer:

last option

Explanation:

A person with a strict interpretation of the constitution wants the government to only perform the powers given to them in the constitution. If the constitution does not explicitly give the power to an individual or group (like the President, Congress, or the Supreme Court) than that group/individual can not perform that duty.

On the other hand, those individuals who think that the constitution is flexible and that some powers can be "assumed" would fall under the category of having a loose interpretation of the constitution.

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

get appointed by Congress. I'm not so sure but it sounds right

The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.

What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.

It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.

Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110

#SPJ11

The major way in which modern consumer law and government agencies has helped being aware as a consumer easier based on the Latin phrase caveat emptor is:

The right of consumers which is being covered with these laws of food labeling is:

The way in which these requirements of food labeling help protect consumers is:

The different types of contracts are:

The major way in which contracts protect consumers is:

For each scenario decide if a legal contract has been made and explain why or why not:

This refers to a legally binding agreement between two or more parties where they agree to do or not to do something.

Read more about contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/984979

Answer:

Option Contract

Explanation:

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties. In contract law, the agreement to keep an offer open for a certain period of time, within which the contract cannot be revoked by the offeror is known as an Option contract. This must be supported by the offeree's consideration.

If the offeree rejects the agreement, then his right of acceptance has been terminated in most jurisdictions. Other factors that can result in the termination of the offeree's power of acceptance include; a counter offer by the offeree, an expiration of the offer, and a conditional acceptance by the offeree.

Answer:

Ethics is important because law enforcement is placed in a position of authority.

Explanation:

sorry....too complex for a non law student

The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."

Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.

When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.

Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145

#SPJ1

Generally speaking, a municipality is a single administrative entity having corporate status and the power to govern itself in accordance with local, state, and federal laws.

A municipality is essentially the state government's answer to the demand for specific public services (such as trash disposal, police and fire protection, water supply, and health care) beyond what the county or other local governments in the area are able to provide.

A municipality must have at least one of the following qualities: a unique geographical region. an extremely public persona. formal structure.

To know more about municipality visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30190342

#SPJ1

Answer:

C. a city, town, or village with its own government

Explanation:

Got it right on Edge quiz

A person who takes the law into their own hands is someone who seeks to enforce justice or exact revenge outside of the legal system.

Individuals who take the law into their own hands often believe that the legal system is ineffective or corrupt, and that they are justified in using force to achieve their desired outcome. They may also feel a strong personal connection to the issue at hand, such as a desire to protect their family or property.

However, taking the law into one's own hands is dangerous and illegal. It undermines the rule of law, creates chaos and violence, and can lead to innocent people being harmed or punished. It can also result in serious legal consequences for the individual who takes such actions, including imprisonment or even death.

It is important for individuals to trust in the legal system and to seek justice through proper channels, such as reporting crimes to the police or working with an attorney. While the legal system may not always be perfect, it is the best way to ensure that justice is served fairly and that innocent people are protected.

For more such questions on law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30037866

#SPJ11

Explanation:

The law enforcement coordinating committee

hope it helps please mark as brainliest

The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.

Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.

While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.

Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27571970

#SPJ1

Answer:

In Pay, Reference Points, and Police Performance (NBER Working Paper No. 12202), Alexandre Mas maintains that when police officers are awarded salaries ... with low wages, but with wages below a reference point that they consider fair.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes because people would be bad and do things there not supposed too. Sometimes some police officers can do bad things but most of them enjoy there job and like helping people so they should be paid to something thats helping everyone. :)

Explanation: