which of the following is not a basis for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a child support case
A) The nonresident has traveled through the state on many occasions
B) In the past, the nonresident had sexual intercourse in the state and the child may have been conceived by that act.
C) In the past, the nonresident resided with the child in the state
D) The nonresident is personally served within the state
Answer:
a
Explanation: it makes sense
What was the difference between the murders of Andrew Goodman/Michael Schwerner and Emmet Till?
Answer:
Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner (along with James Chaney) were activist who were killed by the Ku Klux Klan after talking with members of a black church that had been burned down. Emmet Till was an African American male who was killed by Mose Wright and his half-brother J.W. Milam because he had allegedly been flirting with his wife.
Explanation:
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
Part I: Explore a correctional agency in your state. explain how ancillary entities support the legal system in carrying out justice. (comp. 2.5)
The material's basic description in this SDS is UN1203, Gasoline, ___, and PG1.
The material's basic description in this SDS is UN1203, Gasoline, which is a volatile, flammable liquid, and PG1.
The SDS should provide a more detailed description of the material's properties, hazards, and safety precautions. It is important to carefully read and follow the SDS when working with any hazardous material. UN1203, Gasoline, is a refined petroleum product composed mainly of hydrocarbons, which is used as a fuel for internal combustion engines. It is a highly flammable liquid, with a flashpoint below 23°C (73°F). It is also highly volatile, meaning that it evaporates easily into the atmosphere, and can be harmful if inhaled or swallowed. Gasoline is classified as a PG1 flammable liquid, meaning that it has a high fire risk and must be handled with extreme caution. It is also considered an environmental hazard, as it is toxic to aquatic life and can contaminate drinking water if spilled or leaked.
Learn more about SDS here:
https://brainly.com/question/30713454
#SPJ11
Who would have had to follow the precedent
if the case had been decided by a judge in a
state supreme court?
Answer:
Lower courts
Explanation:
I'm assuming you are taking government. I suffered through government last year. So, ik
10. A contract without consideration is vold. Which of the following is an exception to this
rule?
A. An agreement between family members
B. An agreement to perform an impossible act
C. An agreement on account of love and compassion
D. An agreement to pay a debt that has been barred by statute
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i think so i dont study law or so hopefully i helped somehow
Normally, a contract without consideration is void, except C. An agreement on account of love and compassion.
Ordinarily, there must be a consideration for a contract to be enforceable. Otherwise, the contract is void. The requirement of consideration demands each party to provide something of value in exchange.
In a loving and compassionate relationship, consideration is not required because the law considers a give and take, which is sacrifice, as consideration by law.
Thus, the contract without consideration is void, except in Option C.
Learn more about consideration in contracts here: https://brainly.com/question/1387188
Many Americans believe that the Supreme Court should make policy decisions that are
bold enough to establish new constitutional ground. What is this idea known as?
Explain the "Don'ts" when interviewing the victim of a sexual offense. Explain why you don't do those things during the interview. Essay must be 7 to 10 sentences.
Answer:
In sex crimes, the victim interview is usually your main evidence and your main source of evidence leads, more so than with any other crime. At the same time, the sex crime victim's telling of their stories is usually much more inhibited, guarded, and vulnerable to distortion than for victims of other crimes. Complicating the picture even more, no other crime victim interview tends to make the interviewer feel more uncertain about how best to proceed.DON'T - start your interview without again dedicating three or four minutes solely to addressing the victim's needs and concerns.
Sex crimes victims almost always arrive at the interview plagued with shame, anxieties, misinformation, and with fears of being judged. Even more significant, they usually come to these interviews still very uncertain about whether or not they really want to be going forward with the justice process.
This state of mind is in stark contrast, for example, to a robbery victim who is completely unconflicted about their outrage and can't wait to get the story on the record. As long as these anxieties and uncertainties of sex crimes victims remain unaddressed, chances are they're going to be very hesitant and holding back.
Explanation:
classify the definition or example with the appropriate gas law.
"The pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume at constant temperature." - Boyle's Law"
The total pressure exerted by a mixture of gases is equal to the sum of the pressures exerted by each individual gas." - Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures"
The volume of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature at constant pressure." - Charles's Law"
The rate of effusion of a gas is inversely proportional to the square root of its molar mass." - Graham's Law of Effusion"
The pressure of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas present at constant temperature and volume." - "Avogadro's Law"
Explanation:
This statement describes the relationship between pressure and volume, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Boyle's Law.
The statement refers to the total pressure of a mixture of gases and the individual pressures exerted by each gas. It aligns with Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures.
This statement discusses the relationship between volume and temperature, suggesting a direct proportionality. It relates to Charles's Law.
The statement pertains to the rate of effusion of a gas and its molar mass, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Graham's Law of Effusion.
This statement refers to the relationship between pressure and the number of moles of gas, indicating a direct proportionality. It aligns with Avogadro's Law.
To know more about Boyle's Law, click here https://brainly.com/question/30367133
#SPJ11
the forensic nurse examiner is evaluating a defendant for legal sanity. what finding does little to help the nurse determine legal sanity of the defendant
The finding that does little to help the nurse determine the legal sanity of the defendant is The defendant's emotional state is anxious or fearful.
What is the role of forensic nursing?
Forensic nursing is a medical specialty that encompasses a wide range of healthcare roles. These nurses assess and treat victims of violent and criminal acts. They serve as liaisons between the criminal justice system and healthcare providers. The role of the forensic nurse examiner is to assess the medical needs of victims of violence and provide evidence for legal cases.
This is accomplished by gathering medical data and other evidence and presenting it to legal authorities. The forensic nurse examiner assesses the mental state of victims as well as defendants in a case to help determine the circumstances surrounding the event.
What is legal sanity?
The ability of an individual to understand and appreciate the nature and consequences of their conduct is referred to as legal sanity. In other words, legal sanity refers to a person's state of mind at the time a crime was committed. Legal sanity is an important component of criminal law since it is necessary for a person to be sane at the time of the crime to be held responsible for their actions.What finding does little to help the nurse determine legal sanity of the defendant?The defendant's emotional state is anxious or fearful is the finding that does little to help the nurse determine the legal sanity of the defendant.
To know more about forensic nurse examiner refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/22925514
#SPJ11
Please really need help on this please
It is the responsibility of the legislative branch to
O carry out the laws.
O enforce the laws.
O create the laws.
O interpret the laws.
Answer:
The responsibility of the legislative branch is to
create the laws.
Max, a self-employed taxpayer, did not have all the information he needed to timely file his 2021 tax return by april 18, 2022. although he requested an automatic extension, he did not include a payment when he filed the extension. he then filed his return ten days later, on april 28, 2022, reporting a $1,150 balance due. which, statement is correct regarding the failute-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties?
Max, a self-employed taxpayer, did not have all the data he needed to timely file his 2021 tax return by april 18, 2022. He will only be subject to the failure-to-file penalty; the failure-to-pay penalty will not apply.
You'll presumably cause an Failure to File Penalty in the event that you don't present your duties on time. For each month your return is late, there is a punishment of 5% of your exceptional expense responsibility, up to 25% of your whole neglected charges. There are no punishments for neglecting to record on the off chance that you are qualified for a discount. The fine won't be over 25% of your delinquent assessments.
By and large, inability to record punishment is more extreme than the inability to suffer consequence. The Failure to File Penalty is normally charged at 5% of the exceptional assessments. Each and every month or piece of a month where expense is past due is dependent upon this punishment.
Know more about Failure to File Penalty - https://brainly.com/question/29758709
#SPJ4
the legal system of the united states is based primarily on the french legal system.
a. true b. false
False. The legal system of the United States is based primarily on the English legal system.
The legal system of the United States is based primarily on the English legal system. The Constitution of the United States established a federal system of government, under which the United States is a federal republic. The American legal system is therefore a federal system, under which the laws of the federal government apply to the entire country, while the laws of each state apply only to that state. The federal courts and the state courts are separate and distinct systems, although they may sometimes hear cases that involve both federal and state law. The legal system of the United States is based on common law, which is the system of law that developed in England from the eleventh century onwards. Common law is based on precedent, which means that judges are bound by the decisions of previous judges in similar cases. The common law also emphasizes the role of the jury in determining guilt or innocence, and in determining damages in civil cases.
Learn more about the English legal system: https://brainly.com/question/32221418
#SPJ11
Key Terms
Application forms: series of questions regarding suitability for the job
Biodata: application information empirically developed and scored in a way to maximize prediction
Empirically keyed biodata/criterion keyed biodata: biodata items chosen based only on their relationship to an outcome of interest (e.g., job performance)
Rationally keyed biodata: biodata items informed by a job analysis and items chosen based on their relevance for a particular worker characteristic
Reference checks: The collection of information about prospective job applications from people who have had contact with the applicants
Instructions.
Would you advise an organization use biodata? Why or why not? (2-3 sentences)
I provide an example of an empirically keyed biodata measure that is related to job performance throughout this document (Mount et al., 2000). Choose one question from each domain (problem solving and interpersonal) and answer the questions for each one as if you are hiring a barista. Provide your overall evaluation as well. Problem solving (Add item here)
Is this information really needed to judge an applicant’s qualifications for the job?
Would you expect this item be related to the job performance of a barista?
Will answers to this question have an adverse impact in screening out members of a protected group? Does the question conflict with EEOC guidelines, federal or state laws, or statutes?
How would applicants react to this question? Does the question constitute an invasion of privacy?
Would you use this item? Why or why not?
Yes, I would advise an organization to use biodata. This is because the use of biodata will provide an organization with a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of the applicant's skills, and other traits that are relevant to the job.
This, in turn, will help the organization to hire employees who are better suited to the job, and who are more likely to be successful in the job. Answer more than 100 wordsBiodata is a useful tool that can be used by organizations to assess the suitability of job applicants for a particular job. Biodata is a series of questions that are designed to elicit information about an individual's skills, knowledge, abilities, personality, and other traits that are relevant to the job. Biodata can be empirically keyed or rationally keyed. Empirically keyed biodata is based on items that have been shown to be related to an outcome of interest, such as job performance. Rationally keyed biodata is based on items that have been chosen based on their relevance to a particular worker characteristic.Using biodata can be advantageous to an organization as it will help them to hire employees who are better suited to the job and who are more likely to be successful in the job. However, there are also some potential disadvantages to using biodata. For example, some questions on the biodata may be irrelevant to the job or may not be related to job performance. Additionally, some questions may have an adverse impact on members of a protected group or may conflict with EEOC guidelines, federal or state laws, or statutes. As such, it is important for organizations to carefully evaluate the questions on their biodata to ensure that they are relevant, valid, and non-discriminatory.ConclusionIn conclusion, I would advise an organization to use biodata as it is a useful tool for assessing the suitability of job applicants for a particular job. However, it is important for organizations to carefully evaluate the questions on their biodata to ensure that they are relevant, valid, and non-discriminatory. This will help to ensure that the organization hires employees who are better suited to the job and who are more likely to be successful in the job.
to know more about organization visit:
brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
the development of the juvenile justice system was not initially concerned with what?
In the case of Fletcher v. Peck (1810), Georgia sold large tracts of land to speculators in 1795. A few years later, the Georgia legislature voided the sale in response to public outcry that the original agreement was conducted with bribes. In the intervening period, Robert Fletcher, a land speculator, had purchased a tract of land from John Peck, who had acquired the land from the original agreement in 1795. Fletcher took Peck to court, arguing that he had no right to sell the land and that the sale was a breach of contract. The Court's decision favored Peck based on the argument that bills of attainder and ex post facto laws are unconstitutional. Why is the Supreme Court's decision in the scenario one that reflects judicial restraint
Answer:
Because the court did not review the events and laws that govern the process.
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, Fletcher bought land from Peck before legislation that prohibited the sale of land to speculators was enforced. This means that he made this purchase when this practice was still legal, although there was a clamor for this activity to end. However, Fletcher decided to go to the federal supreme court stating that the purchase was illegal. However, the Court stated that this case was an ex post facto law, which they considered invalid, unconstitutional. This is a type of law with retroactive effects, where its effects work on the facts that happened before its ratification. Thus, the court refused to make a judicial review of these facts, promoting an example of judicial restraint.
Amendment XX, section 1
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
In complete sentences, paraphrase the above amendment.
The given amendment is the 20th amendment of the US Constitution. It is paraphrased in complete sentences as given below.
The Twentieth Amendment is the amendment which sets the dates for the President, Vice President and members of Congress (Senators and Representatives). It sets the dates for when all these important personalities would take office.
The President and the Vice President shall start their jobs on 20th January. The members of Congress (Senators and Representatives) shall start their jobs on 3rd January.
Before this amendment, all of them started their jobs on 4th March. President Franklin Roosevelt was the first president who started his term in January.
To know more about 20th amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/13846279
#SPJ1
Answer:
What this amendment means is that all the terms that they have made have not been approved by, those that date then they will be ended, but if they have been, then the terms will arise.
Explanation:
What this assignment is asking is to paraphrase this amendment and a paraphrase is express the meaning of the writer or speaker or something written or spoken using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity. Which means for this assignment all you had to do is to put what you got out of the amendment.
the of the court also allows for higher courts to check bad decisions or incorrect rulings by lower courts. question 3 options: 1) criminal nature 2) adversarial nature 3) hierarchical nature 4) political nature
The hierarchical nature of the court system allows for higher courts to review and correct decisions made by lower courts. The correct option is 3.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) permits taxpayers to claim as an itemized deduction on their tax returns the interest paid on acquisition debt secured by a personal residence. The judicial system is referred to as having a hierarchical structure because higher courts have the authority to review and reverse decisions made by lower courts. The court system is typically divided into a number of levels, each with its own jurisdiction and authority. This includes the United States.
This hierarchical structure offers a mechanism for resolving mistakes or injustices that may happen at lower levels of the system as well as helps to ensure consistency and fairness in the application of the law. Additionally, it enables the formation of legal precedent, which may aid in directing subsequent choices and guaranteeing that the law is applied consistently over time. The correct option is 3.
Learn more about court system at:
brainly.com/question/3689905
#SPJ4
removing existing barriers when readily achievable in public buildings, such as adding braille markings to elevator buttons, is a requirement of which law?
A limited use/limited application elevator, or LULA, is smaller and moves more slowly than a typical passenger elevator found in a large commercial structure.
According to Meihls, LULAs are made for limited capacity and normally only carry passengers up one or two storeys. Churches, schools, libraries, and small businesses frequently have them.In order to increase accessibility in already-existing structures, LULAs can also be installed. In order to be in compliance with the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (the most recent revision), your building must be altered, renovated, or expanded to remove "accessibility barriers in existing places of public accommodation when doing so is readily achievable."
learn more about LULA here:
https://brainly.com/question/17144835
#SPJ4
When the Constitution entitles all citizens to “due process” of law, what does this phrase mean?
It is C) Every citizen has the right to a trial
Answer:
D: all of the above
Explanation:
Charlotte chambers and other oklahoma residents chartered a van in oklahoma from keemah charter, a louisiana corporation, to attend a basketball tournament in new mexico. While travelling from oklahoma to new mexico, the van stopped in texas. Chambers fell on the steps in the van and broke her ankle. She sued, claiming that keemah failed to maintain the van in a safe condition. Keemah contended that the plaintiff's carelessness caused her injury. Which of the following state's law should apply to the case? a. texas law should apply to the case because that is where the injury occurred. b. oklahoma law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was made. c. new mexico law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was performed.
d. louisiana law should apply to the case because keemah charter is a louisiana corporation.
Analyzing the state's law will be the application of the rules that can differentiate the rules of law. In this scenario, without specific information about the choice of law rules in each relevant jurisdiction, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, I can provide some general principles that may help in making the determination.
Typically, courts apply the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the case. Given the information provided, let's analyze each option:
a. Texas law should apply to the case because that is where the injury occurred.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the injury occurred should apply. While the injury happened in Texas, it does not necessarily mean that Texas law automatically applies.
b. Oklahoma law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was made.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the contract was made should apply. If the contract between Charlotte Chambers and Charter was formed in Oklahoma, it could be argued that Oklahoma law should apply.
c. New Mexico law should apply to the case because that is where the contract was performed.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the contract was performed should apply. If the primary purpose of the contract was transportation to and from New Mexico for the basketball tournament, it could be argued that New Mexico law should apply.
d. Louisiana law should apply to the case because Charter is a Louisiana corporation.
This option suggests that the law of the state where the defendant corporation is incorporated should apply. If Charter is indeed a Louisiana corporation, it could be argued that Louisiana law should apply. However, the law of the state of incorporation does not always automatically govern all aspects of a case.
To know more about state law
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
A polygraph test is conducted, and the findings indicate that there is an 80 percent chance of deception. What does this mean for the investigation?
a) The suspect is guilty and should be arrested for the crime.
b) The suspect is probably just nervous since 80 percent is a pretty high number and usually indicates a false positive.
c) The suspect might be guilty, but more information is needed from other parts of the investigation.
D)There has been a mistake in the polygraph test, and the test should be conducted again to get better results.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Label these examples as either instances of representative or direct democracy
The given examples can be labelled as direct or representative government as given below-
Direct democracy:
A state constitution is amended following a referendum.
California's citizens vote to recall their Governor.
Representative democracy:
Congress votes to impeach an unpopular candidate.
A major bill that many legislators campaigned on passes Congress.
A major bill supported by the majority of citizens passes a state legislature.
Democracy is a form of government where the authority lies on some people but the important and unique part of it is that the government is established "of the people, for the people, and by the people."
A direct democracy is where the people are directly involved in the affairs of the government. In this type of government, any decision needed is voted on by the people, with no need for representation. Example of direct democracy is Switzerland. In this regard, the amendment of a state's constitution following a referendum and the voting to recall their Governor is an example of direct democracy. On the other hand, representative democracy is where the people elect or chose leaders to represent them and their interests. Most of the current democracies today are representative democracies, like India and the United States. The first, second, and third examples are representative forms of democracy.A democracy is a government where power rests on the public instead of a single ruler. There are different types of democracies, but all revolve around the general importance of the public.
Learn more about direct and representative democracy here:
brainly.com/question/14649838
A typical Crop-Hail policy will likely cover ALL the following perils, EXCEPT:
A. lightning
B. failure to harvest.
C. fire.
D. transit to storage after harvest.
Answer:
fire
Explanation:
hope this may help you have a nice day.A typical Crop-Hail policy will likely cover ALL the following perils, except fire.
What are crops?A plant that may be widely cultivated and harvested for food or profit is considered to be a crop. A crop is what is produced when many plants of the same sort are grown in one location. Most plants are grown in hydroponic systems or through agriculture. Macroscopic fungi (like mushrooms) and marine macroalga (like seaweed) are examples of crops, some of which are raised in aquaculture.
Crop-hail insurance is a type of insurance that covers loss and destruction brought on by both fire and hail. It is a product that farmers buy to safeguard agricultural goods while they are still in the field and unharvested.
Therefore, Thus option(C) is correct.
Learn more about crops here:
https://brainly.com/question/801194
#SPJ2
ပရဟိတဆိုတာဘာလဲ ရည်ရွယ်ချက်ဖော်ပြပါ
Answer:
what do you want ?
Explanation:
Forensic linguist research has shown that valuable evidence is sometimes lost because suspects and witnesses are not
asked the right questions. Law-enforcement agencies now hire forensic linguist to
Law-enforcement agencies now hire forensic linguist to assist with investigations and interrogations by analyzing language use and communication patterns to help identify potential sources of information, detect deception, and interpret meaning
What does Law-enforcement agencies now hire forensic linguist to?Forensic linguistics is a valuable tool for law enforcement agencies that can help to ensure that the right questions are asked and that valuable evidence is not lost due to linguistic barriers or miscommunication.
Forensic linguists may be called upon to help with a wide range of cases, such as analyzing threatening letters, identifying the author of an anonymous document, or providing linguistic evidence in court.
Learn more about Law-enforcement at https://brainly.com/question/29422434
#SPJ1
Examine some of the difficulties in the financial system in Ghana and how it has been addressed?
Answer:
The several banks in Ghana had collapsed. The banks were given license few years ago. The banks were heavily deficient in liquidity and they had instability in financial systems.
Explanation:
There have been mergers of some banks in Ghana which lead to financial system inconsistencies. There was continuous mobilization of fund which resulted in unstable deposits. The challenges have been addressed by Implementing Institution Act of 2016.
__?_enforces legal rights and duties
Answer:
Attorney General
Explanation: