yes i agree with all of you

Answer: The first answer choice

AKA: y = -1.74x + 46.6

Step-by-step explanation:

The company should survey at least 601 customers to be 95% confident that the estimated proportion is within 4 percentage points of the true population proportion.

To determine the sample size needed, we can use the formula:

n = (z^2 * p * (1-p)) / E^2

where:

n is the sample size needed

z is the z-score for the desired confidence level (in this case, 1.96 for 95% confidence)

p is the estimated population proportion (we don't have an estimate, so we'll use 0.5, which gives the largest possible sample size)

E is the maximum margin of error (4 percentage points in this case, or 0.04)

Plugging in the values, we get:

n = (1.96^2 * 0.5 * 0.5) / 0.04^2

n = 600.25

We round up to the nearest whole number to get a sample size of 601.

This means that if the company surveys 601 randomly selected customers and finds that, for example, 60% of them keep up with regular vehicle maintenance, we can be 95% confident that the true proportion of all customers who keep up with regular vehicle maintenance is between 56% and 64%.

Learn more about proportion    here: brainly.com/question/31548894

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1:5

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify the ratio of 4:20, we find the greatest common divisor of 4 and 20, and then we divide 4 and 20 by the greatest common divisor. And your answer is for every 1 triangle there is 5 squares.

A regular hexagon can be divided into six equilateral triangles by drawing lines from the center of the hexagon to each of its vertices.

Each of these equilateral triangles has an area that is one-sixth of the total area of the regular hexagon.

When the midpoints of the sides of the regular hexagon are joined to form a smaller regular hexagon, it can be seen that the smaller hexagon is made up of six equilateral triangles, each of which has half the area of the equilateral triangles in the larger hexagon. This is because the sides of the smaller hexagon are half the length of the sides of the larger hexagon.

Therefore, the fraction of the area of the larger hexagon that is enclosed by the smaller hexagon is:

\(6 * (1/2)^2 = 6 * 1/4 = 3/2\)

This means that the smaller hexagon encloses 3/2 of the area of the larger hexagon.

Learn more about hexagon :

https://brainly.com/question/3295271

#SPJ4

The result for the given normal random variables are as follows;

a. E(3X + 2Y) = 18

b. V(3X + 2Y) = 77

c. P(3X + 2Y < 18) = 0.5

d. P(3X + 2Y < 28) = 0.8729

Any normally distributed random variable having mean = 0 and standard deviation = 1 is referred to as a standard normal random variable. The letter Z will always be used to represent it.

Now, according to the question;

The given normal random variables are;

E(X) = 2, V(X) = 5, E(Y) = 6, and V(Y) = 8.

Part a.

Consider E(3X + 2Y)

\(\begin{aligned}E(3 X+2 Y) &=3 E(X)+2 E(Y) \\&=(3) (2)+(2)(6 )\\&=18\end{aligned}\)

Part b.

Consider V(3X + 2Y)

\(\begin{aligned}V(3 X+2 Y) &=3^{2} V(X)+2^{2} V(Y) \\&=(9)(5)+(4)(8) \\&=77\end{aligned}\)

Part c.

Consider P(3X + 2Y < 18)

A normal random variable is also linear combination of two independent normal random variables.

\(3 X+2 Y \sim N(18,77)\)

Thus,

\(P(3 X+2 Y < 18)=0.5\)

Part d.

Consider P(3X + 2Y < 28)

\(Z=\frac{(3 X+2 Y-18)}{\sqrt{77}}\)

\(\begin{aligned} P(3X + 2Y < 28)&=P\left(\frac{3 X+2 Y-18}{\sqrt{77}} < \frac{28-18}{\sqrt{77}}\right) \\&=P(Z < 1.14) \\&=0.8729\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the values for the given normal random variables are found.

To know more about the normal random variables, here

https://brainly.com/question/23836881

#SPJ4

The correct question is-

X and Y are independent, normal random variables with E(X) = 2, V(X) = 5, E(Y) = 6, and V(Y) = 8. Determine the following:

a. E(3X + 2Y)

b. V(3X + 2Y)

c. P(3X + 2Y < 18)

d. P(3X + 2Y < 28)

Answer:

The value of h is h = -1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

The quadratic equation is represented by a parabola, the vertex form of the equation is y = a(x - h)² + k, where

(h , k) are the coordinates of its vertex point

a is the coefficient of x²

∵ The graph is a parabola opens up

∵ It has a vertex at (-1.5, 0)

∵ The vertex of the parabola is (h , k)

∴ h = -1.5 and k = 0

∵ The graph shows f(x) = (x - h)²

∵ The coordinates of the vertex are (h , k)

∵ h = -1.5 and k = 0

∴ h = -1.5

The value of h is h = -1.5

The value of h is h = -1.5

We have given that,

On a coordinate plane, a parabola opens up and goes through (negative 2, 5), has vertex (0, 1), and goes through (2, 5). Another parabola opens to the right and goes through (8, 4), has vertex (negative 8, 0), and goes through (8, negative 4).

The quadratic equation is represented by a parabola,

The  vertex form of the equation is y = a(x - h)² + k, where

(h, k) are the coordinates of its vertex point

a is the coefficient of x²

∵ The graph is a parabola that opens up

∵ It has a vertex at (-1.5, 0)

∵ The vertex of the parabola is (h , k)

∴ h = -1.5 and k = 0

∵ The graph shows f(x) = (x - h)²

∵ The coordinates of the vertex are (h, k)

∵ h = -1.5 and k = 0

∴ h = -1.5

The value of h is h = -1.5.

To learn more about the vertex form of parabola visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17987697

#SPJ2

Answer:

Sal previously earned $61640.

Answer:

$62,000.00

Step-by-step explanation:

x + .08x = 66960  Combine like terms

1.08 x = 66960  Divide both sides by 1.08

\(\frac{1.08x}{1.08}\) = \(\frac{66960}{1.08}\)

x = 62000

Answer:

I think it is C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

volume is length x width x height, the answer is 160 cubed feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

Length x width x height and bam, there is your answer

The pizza is 6.5 feet tall in height

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Volume = 195 cubic feet

Length = 6 feet

Width = 5 feet

The height of the pizza can be calculate using

Height = Volume/(Length * Width)

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Height = 195/(6 * 5)

Evaluate

Height = 6.5

Hence, the height is 6.5 feet

Read more about volume at

https://brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ1

The chance that five minutes or more passes between two hits is equal to e(-5), where is the rate of hits per minute.

The chance that 5 or more minutes pass between two hits can be calculated using the exponential distribution formula. Let λ be the rate of hits per minute. The probability that no hits occur in a time interval of length t is given by e^(-λt). Therefore, the probability that at least one hit occurs in a time interval of length t is 1-e^(-λt).

To find the probability that 5 or more minutes pass between two hits, we need to calculate the probability that no hits occur in a time interval of length 5 or greater. This is given by e^(-5λ). Therefore, the probability that at least one hit occurs within 5 minutes is 1-e^(-5λ).

So, the chance that 5 or more minutes pass between two hits is simply the complement of this probability:

P(5 or more minutes pass between two hits) = 1 - (1-e^(-5λ))

Simplifying this expression, we get:

P(5 or more minutes pass between two hits) = e^(-5λ)

Thus, the chance that 5 or more minutes pass between two hits is equal to e^(-5λ), where λ is the rate of hits per minute.
visit here to learn more about exponential distribution:

brainly.com/question/22692312

#SPJ11

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation: The explicit formula used: An = 1000(2)n - 1 is the correct formula. This is modeled as exponential growth with a common ratio of 2; which is correct based on the data given in the table.

The predicted population for year 50 is approximately \(1.1259\) x \(10^18\) wombats.

To predict the populations for years 6, 10, and 50 using the given explicit formula an = \(1000(2)^n\) – 1, we can substitute the respective values of n and calculate the population.

For year 6 (n = 6):

a6 =  \(1000(2)^6\) – 1

a6 = 1000(64) – 1

a6 = 64,000 – 1

a6 ≈ 63,999

The predicted population for year 6 is approximately 63,999 wombats.

For year 10 (n = 10):

a10 = \(1000(2)^ 10\)

a10 = 1000(1,024) – 1

a10 = 1,024,000 – 1

a10 = 1,023,999

The predicted population for year 10 is 1,023,999 wombats.

For year 50 (n = 50):

a50 = \(1000(2)^50\) – 1

a50 = 1000(1.1259 x 10¹⁵ ) – 1

a50 = 1.1259 x 10¹⁸ – 1

a50 ≈ 1.1259 x 10¹⁸

The predicted population for year 50 is approximately 1.1259 x 10^18 wombats.

To know more about geometric sequence. here

https://brainly.com/question/29632351

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

we will need to find the volume of the frosting

V=l*w*h

V=2(13*2*9)= 468 in^2 of frosting for the cake

Answer:

y = |x| -1

Step-by-step explanation:

one unit downward would change the overall Y value by -1 unit

The solution to the system is x1 = 8, x2 = 1, and x3 = -1.

To solve the systems, we will use the method of elimination. This method involves multiplying one or both equations by a constant in order to eliminate one of the variables.

First, we will eliminate x1 from the first and second equations by multiplying the first equation by -1 and then adding the two equations together:
-1(x1 - 3x2) = -1(5)
-x1 + 3x2 = -5

-x1 + x2 + 5x3 = 2
2x2 + 5x3 = -3
Next, we will eliminate x2 from the second and third equations by multiplying the second equation by -1 and then adding the two equations together:
-1(-x1 + x2 + 5x3) = -1(2)

x1 - x2 - 5x3 = -2
x2 + x3 = 0
x1 - 6x3 = -2

Finally, we will eliminate x3 from the second and third equations by multiplying the third equation by -5 and then adding the two equations together:

-5(x2 + x3) = -5(0)
-5x2 - 5x3 = 0

2x2 + 5x3 = -3
-3x2 = -3
x2 = 1

Now that we know the value of x2, we can substitute it back into the third equation to find the value of x3:
x2 + x3 = 0
1 + x3 = 0
x3 = -1
And finally, we can substitute the values of x2 and x3 back into the first equation to find the value of x1:
x1 - 3x2 = 5
x1 - 3(1) = 5
x1 = 8
So the solution to the system is x1 = 8, x2 = 1, and x3 = -1.

Learn more about linear equations using matrices and row operations:https://brainly.com/question/29054949

#SPJ11

Rotating an image 90 degrees counterclockwise means turning the image so that it appears to be facing to the left. This can be done using various software programs, including image editors like Adobe Photoshop or online tools like PicMonkey.

In Adobe Photoshop, you can rotate an image 90 degrees counterclockwise by selecting the "Transform" option from the "Edit" menu. This will bring up a bounding box around the image, and you can then use the "Rotate" tool to turn the image counterclockwise.

If you are using an online tool, the process is similar. Simply upload the image you want to rotate, select the "Rotate" tool, and then choose the "90 degrees counterclockwise" option.

In conclusion, rotating an image 90 degrees counterclockwise is a straightforward process that can be done using various software programs and online tools. Whether you are editing photos for personal use or for a school project, understanding image manipulation is an important skill to have.

to know more about clockwise rotation refer here

https://brainly.com/question/1790540#

#SPJ11

The viable answer, according to the provided profit equations, is that they make the same profit after three days, while the nonviable response is -4 because the number of days must be a positive value.

Given that the profit equation of the first friend is

P(x) = −x² + 5x + 12 ...(1)

and the profit equation of the second friend is

Q(x) = 6x  ...(2)

The system we use to determine when they earn the same profit is provided by:

P(x) = Q(x)

i.e.  −x² + 5x + 12  =  6x  

i.e. x² + x - 12 = 0

i.e. x² + 4x - 3x - 12 = 0

i.e. x(x + 4) - 3(x + 4) = 0

i.e. (x + 4)(x - 3) = 0

i.e. x = 3, -4

Because the number of days must be positive, the viable answer is that they earn the same profit after three days, while the nonviable answer is -4.

Learn more about profit equations here -

https://brainly.com/question/26778029

#SPJ10

The minimum amount of energy required to operate the winch while lifting the maximum package mass ≈ 2698.46 ft-lbf or 3656.98 J.

To calculate the minimum amount of energy required to operate the winch while lifting the maximum package mass, we need to consider the gravitational potential energy.

The gravitational potential energy can be calculated using the formula:

E = mgh

Where:

E is the gravitational potential energy

m is the mass

g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²)

h is the height

First, we need to convert the units to the appropriate system.

The provided height is in meters, and the provided masses are in pound-mass (lbm). We will convert them to feet and pounds, respectively.

We have:

Height (h) = 2.25 m = 7.38 ft

Package mass (m) = 11.2 lbm

Now, we can calculate the minimum amount of energy:

E = mgh

E = (11.2 lbm) * (32.2 ft/s²) * (7.38 ft)

E ≈ 2698.46 ft-lbf

To convert this value to joules, we need to use the conversion factor:

1 ft-lbf ≈ 1.35582 J

Therefore, the minimum amount of energy required is:

E ≈ 2698.46 ft-lbf ≈ 3656.98 J

To know more about energy refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14012613#

#SPJ11

The largest composite less than 1000 with a GPF of 3 is 996. To prove that it is the largest, we can note that any larger multiple of 3 would either be a prime or have a larger prime factor than 3.

a) To determine the sequence of GPFs for the composites from 60 to 65, we can list the prime factors of each number and take the largest:

- 60 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 5, so the GPF is 5

- 61 is prime

- 62 = 2 x 31, so the GPF is 31

- 63 = 3 x 3 x 7, so the GPF is 7

- 64 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2, so the GPF is 2

- 65 = 5 x 13, so the GPF is 13

Therefore, the sequence of GPFs for the composites from 60 to 65 is 5, prime, 31, 7, 2, 13.

b) The given sequence of GPFs is 41, 19, 79. All of these numbers are prime, so any successive composites that would give this sequence of GPFs would have to be divisible by each of these primes. The product of 41, 19, and 79 is 62,999, which is a four-digit number. Therefore, any composite that would give the sequence of GPFs 41, 19, 79 would have to have at least four digits.

c) To find the smallest composites that give the sequence of GPFs 17, 73, 2, 19, we can start with 17 x 73 x 2 x 19 = 45634, which is a five-digit number. The next composite with these GPFs would be obtained by adding the product of these primes to 45634. This gives 3215678, which is a seven-digit number. Therefore, the smallest successive composites that give the sequence of GPFs 17, 73, 2, 19 are 45634 and 3215678.

d) To find the largest composite less than 1000 with a GPF of 3, we can list the multiples of 3 less than 1000 and eliminate the primes by inspection:

- 3 x 1 = 3

- 3 x 2 = 6

- 3 x 3 = 9 (prime)

- 3 x 4 = 12

- 3 x 5 = 15

- 3 x 6 = 18

- 3 x 7 = 21 (prime)

- 3 x 332 = 996

- 3 x 333 = 999 (prime)

For such more questions on factor

https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ8

Answer: x = 45/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

11 1/4 simplified form

45/4 exact form

11.25 decimal form

The number of degrees in the measure of the vertex angle is 50 degrees.

An isosceles triangle has two equal sides and two equal base angles. In your question, the measure of a base angle is 65 degrees. To find the measure of the vertex angle, we'll use the fact that the sum of angles in any triangle is always 180 degrees.

Since both base angles are equal, their combined measure is 2 * 65 = 130 degrees. Now, we subtract the sum of the base angles from the total angle measure of the triangle:

180 degrees (total angle measure) - 130 degrees (sum of base angles) = 50 degrees.

So, the measure of the vertex angle in the isosceles triangle is 50 degrees. In summary, when given the measure of a base angle in an isosceles triangle, we can use the triangle's angle sum property to find the measure of the vertex angle.

Learn more about isosceles triangle here: https://brainly.com/question/29793403

#SPJ11

The Bootstrap Method is straightforward and straightforward to comprehend. First, it chooses randomly from the original sample to produce bootstrap samples from our initial sample.

After that, it uses summary statistics like variation, standard deviation, mean, and so on to get replicates, which is how we can calculate a confidence interval from that sample.

Thus, the answer is "Yes."

The bootstrap method is a resampling method that uses replacement sampling to estimate population statistics. It can be used to estimate standard deviation and mean summaries.

Remember that bootstrapping isn't only valuable for computing standard blunders, it can likewise be utilized to build certainty spans and perform speculation testing. When working with data that doesn't seem to lend itself to conventional methods, always remember bootstrapping techniques.

To learn more about Bootstrap Method here

https://brainly.com/question/16931477

#SPJ4

Full Question = We want to find a 95% confidence interval for the standard deviation of a large dataset, given a sample.

Can the bootstrap method be used?

Group of answer choices

yes

no

In both triangles

Hence both triangles are similar by AA congruency

To find the percentage of usable components, we need to calculate the probability that the thickness of a component falls within the specified range.

First, we need to standardize the values using the Z-score formula:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the value we want to standardize, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

For the lower value:

Z1 = (2.275 - 2.3) / 0.015

For the upper value:

Z2 = (2.325 - 2.3) / 0.015

Next, we can use a Z-table or a statistical software to find the probabilities associated with these Z-scores.

Let's assume we find that the Z-score for the lower value is -1.67 and the Z-score for the upper value is 1.67.

Now, we can find the probability that a component falls within this range by subtracting the cumulative probability of the lower value from the cumulative probability of the upper value:

P(2.275 ≤ X ≤ 2.325) = P(Z ≤ 1.67) - P(Z ≤ -1.67)

Using a Z-table or a statistical software, we find that P(Z ≤ 1.67) is approximately 0.9525 and P(Z ≤ -1.67) is approximately 0.0475.

Finally, we can calculate the percentage by multiplying the probability by 100:

Percentage of usable components = (0.9525 - 0.0475) * 100 = 90%

Therefore, approximately 90% of the components are usable within the specified thickness range.

Learn more about standard deviation, brainly.com/question/13470923

#SPJ11

Answer:

7.6

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is A) No, the condition for independence has not been met because random samples were not selected from each location.

To test for a difference in population proportions between Location Q and Location W, it is important to ensure that the conditions for statistical inference are met.

The conditions include random sampling, independence of samples, and the appropriate sample sizes.

In this scenario, the nutritionist obtained a random sample of orders from Location Q and a random sample of orders from Location W. This satisfies the condition of random sampling, as the samples were chosen in a way that each order had an equal chance of being selected.

To meet the condition for independence, the samples should be collected in such a way that the selection of orders from one location does not influence or depend on the selection of orders from the other location.

Without this condition being explicitly mentioned, it cannot be assumed that the samples are independent.

Regarding the sample sizes, the information provided states that there were 215 orders from Location Q and 175 orders from Location W. While it is not mentioned how these sample sizes relate to the corresponding population sizes, it is not a condition that the sample sizes be large compared to the population sizes.

In conclusion, the condition for independence, which is essential for testing a difference in population proportions, has not been explicitly met in this scenario.

Without assurance of independence, the validity of the statistical inference for comparing the proportion of orders containing a salad between the two locations may be compromised.

Therefore, the conditions for inference for testing a difference in population proportions have not been met in this scenario.

To know more about random samples refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12719654#

#SPJ11

The width of the confidence interval increases as the sample size increases and decreases as the confidence interval decreases. The confidence interval decreases as the sample size increases and increases as the confidence level increases.

Sample size is defined as the number of observations used to determine

an estimate of a particular population. The size of the model is drawn by people. Sampling is the process of selecting a group of individuals from a population to estimate the characteristics of the entire population. Select the number of establishments in a population group for analysis.

The sample size increases with the square of the standard deviation and decreases with the square of the difference between the mean under the alternative hypothesis and the mean under the null hypothesis.

Learn more about Sample Size:

https://brainly.com/question/25894237

#SPJ4

The fraction which represents the slope formula for the line is equal to \(\frac{4}{4}\).

Given the following data:

Points on x-axis = (4, 0)

Points on y-axis = (9, 5).

The slope of a line can be defined as the gradient of a line and it's typically used to describe both the ratio, direction and steepness of an equation of a straight line.

Mathematically, the slope of a line is given by the following formula;

\(Slope, m = \frac{Change\;in\;y\;axis}{Change\;in\;x\;axis}\\\\Slope, m = \frac{y_2\;-\;y_1}{x_2\;-\;x_1}\)

Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;

\(Slope, m = \frac{9\;-\;5}{4\;-\;0}\\\\Slope, m = \frac{4}{4}\)

Read more on slope here: brainly.com/question/3493733