with reference to the hierarchy of sources of law, case law prevails over local ordinances. group of answer choices true false

The A can get a prohibitory injunction in equity and stop B from spraying the land with pesticides, even though A claims compensation at law.

Injunctions, specific performance, and prohibitory injunctions are some examples of equitable remedies. An injunction is a court order telling someone to stop doing something that is against the law. Injunctions and particular performance are the two primary equitable remedies, and in informal legal jargon, allusions to equitable remedies are sometimes phrased as referring to those two remedies alone.

An injunction can be prohibitive, preventing someone from doing something, or mandatory, ordering them to do something. The harm includes payment for the "market value" of your animal as well as related "economic damages" such as veterinarian costs. Additionally, noneconomic and punitive damages may be awarded in certain circumstances, such as when the individual intentionally hurt your animal.

To learn more about punitive damages, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14001157

#SPJ1

Answer:

the things on the left are the answer

In the context of Mexican American gangs in Los Angeles, those who found it difficult to adapt to American culture often referred to themselves as "pachucos" or "zoot suiters."

Pachucos were a subculture of Mexican American youth in the 1940s and 1950s who developed their own distinctive style, including wearing oversized zoot suits with wide-brimmed hats and flamboyant accessories.

The pachuco culture was seen as a way for young Mexican Americans to express their identity and assert their presence in a society that marginalized them. The term "pachuco" was later adopted by Mexican American gang members as a source of pride and camaraderie.

Learn more about American culture https://brainly.com/question/13720219

#SPJ11

Answer:

You absolutely do not agree to lie or cover up for your friend. But I would also answer that before I even waited to be approached by someone, I would have already reached out to the Lieutenant to advise him or her of what I witnessed. But also, I would share with him or her, what exactly was asked of me by someone I knew quite personally.

One real-life example in which a media myth was exposed by activists involves the case of the "Central Park Five" in the late 1980s.

In 1989, a widely publicized crime occurred in New York City's Central Park, where a female jogger was brutally assaulted and raped. The media coverage at the time sensationalized the incident, and five teenagers of color were accused and convicted of the crime based on confessions they made under duress.

However, over time, activists and advocates began to question the validity of the convictions. The case gained renewed attention in the early 2000s, and evidence came to light suggesting that the confessions were coerced and that DNA evidence did not match any of the accused. A documentary titled "The Central Park Five" was released in 2012, further shedding light on the wrongful convictions and the role of media in perpetuating the myth of their guilt.

Activists and advocates worked tirelessly to challenge the media narrative and raise awareness about the injustices faced by the Central Park Five. Their efforts ultimately led to a successful counterclaim, with the convictions being overturned in 2002, more than a decade after the initial trial.

This case serves as a powerful example of how activists and advocates can expose media myths and challenge public perceptions surrounding crime and deviance-related social problems. By critically examining the evidence and presenting an alternative narrative, they were able to highlight the systemic issues of racial bias, wrongful convictions, and the influence of media sensationalism.

The Central Park Five case not only exposed the injustice suffered by the wrongfully convicted individuals but also sparked important discussions about the role of race, class, and media in shaping public opinion and criminal justice outcomes. It serves as a reminder of the importance of questioning dominant narratives, advocating for the truth, and working towards a more equitable and just society.

Learn more about activists here

https://brainly.com/question/1807476

#SPJ11

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) made changes to the rules for like-kind exchanges, affecting certain aspects of tax law.

Under the TCJA, the like-kind exchange provision in the tax code was modified, limiting its application to real property exchanges. Prior to the TCJA, like-kind exchanges could also include personal property exchanges. However, starting from tax year 2018 onwards, like-kind exchanges are only allowed for real property, such as land and buildings.

The changes introduced by the TCJA have implications for taxpayers who engage in like-kind exchanges. They need to be aware that only exchanges involving real property will qualify for tax-deferred treatment. Exchanges involving personal property, such as vehicles or equipment, are no longer eligible for like-kind exchange treatment. It's essential for taxpayers to understand these modifications to accurately comply with the new rules and properly report their transactions on their tax returns.

Learn more about tax law here:

https://brainly.com/question/31924751

#SPJ11

Legal insanity is a state of contractual incapacity, as determined by law. This means that individuals who are legally insane are unable to enter into a valid bdue to their mental condition.

The law recognizes that such individuals lack the ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions, and therefore, any contracts entered into by them are considered null and void.

Contractual incapacity due to legal insanity is an important concept in contract law, as it ensures that individuals who are not capable of making rational decisions are not bound by agreements that they may not have understood or intended to enter into. The determination of legal insanity is typically made by a court of law, and may involve an assessment of the individual's mental health and ability to understand the nature of the contract.

It is important to note that legal insanity is not the same as a mistake, nullification, confusion, or misunderstanding. While these concepts may also render a contract invalid, they are not necessarily tied to an individual's mental health or capacity. Legal insanity is a specific legal concept that recognizes the limitations of individuals who are unable to make rational decisions due to their mental state, and seeks to protect them from entering into contracts that may be detrimental to their well-being.

To know more about legal insanity

https://brainly.com/question/31445937

#SPJ11

Lightly-traveled, two-lane roads in the city or in rural or suburban areas are generally considered to be Low-Risk Environments. In these areas, the speed limit is usually restricted to 35 mph or less and there are fewer right-of-way conflicts.

Hope this helps :P

Brainliest? ^///^

Answer:

Appellate :)

Explanation:

Answer:

in think the answer is panel

Answer:

The answer is True!

Explanation:

Because, A police officer have to gain trust! just like everyday people.

Answer:

True

"Once accepted into the ranks of the police, an individual is introduced to the police subculture, which is a set of norms and values governing police behavior. One of the reasons why this subculture exists is due to the danger, stress, and isolation that are common in police work. Recruits learn these values and norms starting in the training that they receive at police academies. They learn not only the formal rules about policing but also the informal ones that are expected by others in this subculture. At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers. Other aspects that also play a role are group solidarity, honor, and respect for police authority."

Answer:

The Penal Law of the State of New York

Explanation:

The Penal Law of the State of New York combines justification and necessity into a single article, Article 35. "Defense of Justification" comprises sections 35.05 through 35.30 of the Penal Law. The general provision relating to necessity, section 35.05, provides: § 35.05 Justification; generally.

:)

Option (c), One of the top nine traffic infractions is NOT turning in a "turn only" lane.

You should make your turn from of the lane that really is closest to the direction you wish to go and into the one that is closest to the one you came from if there are no signs or lane markings that prohibit turning. You will just need to cross a small number of lanes of traffic.

Most driving-related offenses fall under the category of infractions (also called "violations" or "civil infractions"). The least serious traffic offense is a traffic infraction, which is often defined as an act or omission that is illegal but is not a crime. Examples of frequent violations include speeding.

Learn more about traffic infractions: https://brainly.com/question/9833394

#SPJ1

Based on the provided information, the state law requires local governments to prepare general fund and special revenue fund budgets using a basis of accounting that differs from the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

However, when reporting the actual amounts in the budgetary comparison schedule, they should be reported on the GAAP basis.

This means that while the local governments are allowed to use a different basis of accounting for their budgeting purposes, when it comes to reporting the actual amounts, they are required to adhere to GAAP. GAAP is a set of accounting principles and standards that provide consistency and comparability in financial reporting.

By reporting the actual amounts on the GAAP basis, it ensures that the financial information is presented in a manner that is widely accepted and understood.

To know more about accounting principles refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/28903748

#SPJ11

The terms "mortgage lender" or "mortgage broker" may not be used in advertisements unless the user is authorized to act as a residential mortgage lender, broker or originator under the act.

It is illegal to use the terms "mortgage lender," "mortgage broker," or "mortgage originator" in advertisements unless the person is duly authorized to act as a residential mortgage lender, broker or originator under the applicable act. By requiring that only licensed professionals advertise and provide mortgage related services, this restriction aims to protect consumers.

The regulatory framework contributes to the prevention of misleading or deceptive advertising and encourages transparency in the mortgage industry by forbidding unlicensed individuals from using these terms. The purpose of licensing requirements is to protect the interests of consumers and preserve the integrity of the industry by ensuring that those offering mortgage services adhere to a set of standards and qualifications.

Learn more about mortgage lender at:

brainly.com/question/32196507

#SPJ4

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Answer: yes, you have to have your permit done

Explanation: went to driving school

Answer:

A. No, running for office is an option, not a requirement.

Explanation:

Answer:

$1,784.53

Explanation:

It's in section 1 of the federal reserves example credit report

Under roe v. wade (1973), as originally decided, the state largely prohibit women from having abortions after the beginning of the third trimester.

From the beginning of the third trimester a foetus became viable under the medical technology. The Court ruled that a state's interest in protecting prenatal life became so compelling that it could legally prohibit all abortions except where necessary to protect the mother's life or health.

Abortion is defined as the termination of a pregnancy by removal or expulsion of an embryo or foetus. An abortion that basically occurs without intervention is known as a miscarriage or "spontaneous abortion".  These occur in approximately 30% to 40% of pregnancies. When the deliberate steps are taken to end a pregnancy, it is termed as an induced abortion or "induced miscarriage".

To know more about Abortions refer to-

brainly.com/question/25852477#

#SPJ4

Answer: Deflation is the opposite of inflation  which is the first highlighted one!

Dont know why almost every vertified is wrong anyways I took the test and got 100%! Hope u have an amazing day!

The paragraph in the text where the information could best be integrated to achieve this will be Deflation is the opposite of inflation.

Deflation is the opposite of inflation. Inflation is when the prices of goods and services rise over time, while deflation is when the prices of goods and services fall over time. This means that the purchasing power of money increases during deflation, as people can buy more goods and services with the same amount of money.

Inflation and deflation are both economic phenomena that can have a significant impact on the economy. It is important for central banks to monitor these factors and take steps to prevent either inflation or deflation from becoming too extreme.

Learn more about inflation

https://brainly.com/question/21586910

#SPJ1

Answer:

reducing the number of hours committed to studying

Explanation:

hope it helps

\( \: \: \: \: \)

you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science

\( \: \: \: \: \: \)

Option c: the main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees that The Supreme Court only defines the guarantees on a case-by-case basis.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States.

It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all United States federal and state court actions relating to provisions of the United States Constitution or federal law.

It also has unique jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, in particular "all cases involving ambassadors, other ministers of public service and consuls, and cases in which the state is said to be a party.

To learn more about 'supreme court', here:

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees is that the

A) Constitution is too specific.

B) guarantees protect citizens against unfair processes, but not unfair laws.

C) The Supreme Court only defines the guarantees on a case-by-case basis.

D) courts do not want to give away too much specific information to potential lawbreakers.

Social capital is defined as the resources produced by the quality of relationships between people. Social capital is a concept that describes the value of social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trust that arise from them.

It refers to the resources that individuals and communities can access through their relationships with others, such as information, support, and opportunities. Social capital can be both tangible, such as financial assistance, and intangible, such as emotional support and a sense of belonging.
Research has shown that social capital can have significant benefits for individuals and communities. It can lead to improved health outcomes, better educational attainment, increased economic opportunities, and stronger social cohesion. However, social capital can also be unevenly distributed, with some individuals and groups having greater access to social networks and resources than others.
Overall, social capital is an important resource for individuals and communities, and understanding its dynamics can help promote more equitable and inclusive societies.

To know more about Social capital visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31610127

#SPJ11

Answer:

Corruption

Explanation:

Corruption is one of the problem of our country Nigeria because if the embezzlement of public funds by our government