Answer:
Explanation:
The schools weren't just a tool for cultural genocide. They were also a way to separate native children from their land. During the same era in which thousands of children were sent away, the US encroached on tribal lands through war, broken treaties, and new policies.
Answer:
The schools weren't just a tool for cultural genocide. They were also a way to separate native children from their land. During the same era in which thousands of children were sent away, the US encroached on tribal lands through war, broken treaties, and new policies
Explanation:
Native American children, some as young as 5, were taken from their families and brought to government-run boarding schools. This practice began in the 1860's and continued for almost 100 years. Children ripped away from their families hid their native selves. Unlike European children, Native American children were seldom struck or "spanked" when they disobeyed. Punishment usually involved teasing and shame in front of the rest of the tribe. At the same time, children who obeyed were praised and honored in front the tribe
As a native American descent im proud to help
PLEASE ITS AN EMERGENCY SOMBODY PLEASE ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer:
look for a blue house with a quilt .
2. Harding's triumph in 1920 was symbolic of what
general American sentiment?
A America accepted "collective security"
(B. Americans wanted to become more involved in
international relations,
C. Americans favored an isoluationist approach,
D Americans liked Wilson's idea of "making the world
safe" for democracy
Answer:
C. Americans favored an isolationist approach,
Explanation:
Warren Harding was a publisher and editor of a senator who ran for the presidency under the Republican party. Before then, he has been in active politics as a Senator and as well as a Lieutenant Governor of Ohio.
He denounced the nationalistic activism or the global idealism of the previous administrations but rather pleaded for normalcy. His famous speech contains this quote "America's present need is not heroics but healing; not nostrums but normalcy; not revolution but restoration...not surgery but serenity." resonates with the general Americans sentiment in support of his direction to take the government towards to.
5. Do you think the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did enough to protect the rights of Mexican citizens whose land became part of the United States? Why? (6 points)
I CHOOSE BRAINLIEST!!!!
Historians and scholars have criticized the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo for not protecting the rights of Mexicans in the newly acquired territories, resulting in discrimination, violence, displacement, and violations of their legal rights. So, we can state that they did not do enough.
What is the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo?The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was a peace agreement signed in 1848 that ended the Mexican-American War and ceded a large portion of Mexico's territory to the United States.
Some historians and scholars have criticized the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo for failing to protect the rights of Mexican citizens whose land became part of the United States. The treaty did not offer explicit protections for the rights of Mexicans living in the newly acquired territories, and many of them faced discrimination, violence, and displacement as a result of the annexation. In some cases, they were forced to leave their homes and lands, and their legal rights were not always respected.
Learn more about the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on:
https://brainly.com/question/13794445
#SPJ1
Draw Inferences Choose one of the items you learned about. Explain
how the history of the hemisphere that item traveled to would be different if
the Columbian Exchange had not happened.
if the Columbian Exchange had not brought maize to Europe, the history of the hemisphere that maize traveled to would have been marked by lower agricultural productivity, food shortages, and slower population growth. The absence of maize would have hindered economic development and cultural transformations that occurred as a result of its introduction.
If we consider the introduction of maize (corn) from the Americas to the Old World through the Columbian Exchange, the history of the hemisphere that maize traveled to, particularly Europe, would have been significantly different if this exchange had not occurred.
Maize played a crucial role in European agriculture and diets after its introduction. Prior to the Columbian Exchange, Europeans relied mainly on grains such as wheat, barley, and oats. Maize, with its high yields and adaptability to various climates, brought about a revolution in European agriculture. Its cultivation spread rapidly, especially in regions where traditional grains struggled to thrive.
Without the introduction of maize, Europe would have faced challenges in sustaining its growing population. The increased agricultural productivity provided by maize enabled European societies to support larger populations and experience demographic shifts. The availability of a reliable and high-yielding crop like maize also had significant economic implications, leading to increased trade and the emergence of a more diversified and prosperous European economy.
Furthermore, the introduction of maize had cultural and culinary impacts. It became a staple food in many European regions and influenced traditional cuisines. Its versatility and nutritional value contributed to dietary diversity and improved the overall health and well-being of European populations.
for more questions on economic
https://brainly.com/question/17996535
#SPJ8
what are some reasons behind the great migration
Answer:
The great migration was a mass movement of African Americans during the first, and second, world wars. After being enslaved, and trapped in sharecropping in the Jim Crow south, African Americans were in a dire state of being used and taken advantage of, even after slavery had successfully been abolished. During the first world war, however, most white men were off in Europe fighting within the final year of the first world war. African Americans saw this as an amazing advantage to be able to break free of sharecropping and move farther north where there would be a greater chance for switching from agriculture to industry and factories. So, to recap, African Americans migrated north to escape sharecropping, escape the Jim Crow laws of the south, and become more advantageous in the industries of the north.
Happy to help! Please give me brainliest so that I can level up!
Why did the pilgrams leave europe?
Answer:
The pilgrims left Europe because they wanted to escape persecution. The Puritans left Europe because they wanted to reform the Anglican Church.
Explanation:
I promise that this is the answer!
I need help please. I will give you brain list.
Answer:
1. The Americans generally thought of the Japanese with disrespect so they represented the Japanese with a snake which generally have a negative connotation.
2. Sexuality during the war was mostly not as progressive as it is today. in fact some people pretended to be gay in order to not work as a soldier.
Explanation:
Read this writing prompt. Write an argumentative essay about whether kids should be allowed to bring cell phones to school. Based on the prompt, which claim is the strongest? Cell phones are helpful tools that allow people to easily access information and stay organized. In the latest survey, 78 percent of kids asked said that they believed they should be allowed to bring cell phones to school. Schools should not allow kids to bring cell phones because they are too much of a distraction. Not every kid can have a cell phone because they are expensive and many kids do not have jobs.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer s c
Explanation:
what is william shakespeare’s favorite color and WHYYY
Answer:
green
Explanation:
its mentioned most frequently in his work, the second color being most mentioned is red.
Describe the conflict and tension between states’ rights and strong federal government that has existed from the 1700s through the Civil War era. What were the major aims of each side of this debate, who were the leaders of these movements? Finally, describe how the fight over states’ rights versus federalism occurred, using specific examples to make your argument.
The conflict and tension between states’ rights and strong federal government that existed from the 1700s through the Civil War era is referred to as the States' rights debate. The idea of states' rights dates back to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, with the Anti-Federalists and Federalists disagreeing on the amount of power each government would hold.
The Anti-Federalists were in favor of states' rights, which would give the states greater control over their affairs, while the Federalists were in favor of a strong central government.The primary purpose of the states' rights movement was to restrict the powers of the federal government while granting more authority to the state governments.
States' rights proponents were motivated by a belief that state governments should have the freedom to make choices about their economy and society without federal intervention, especially when it came to issues like tariffs and slavery.
The fight over states’ rights versus federalism occurred in the 19th century when several issues, including tariffs, slavery, and internal improvements, caused sectional divisions in the United States. One of the most significant issues in the States' rights debate was slavery.
States in the South were in favor of slavery and wanted the federal government to allow them to continue the practice. On the other hand, northern states wanted to abolish slavery.In addition to slavery, the Nullification Crisis, which occurred during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, highlighted the conflict between states' rights and federalism.
The crisis was triggered by the Tariff of Abominations, which taxed imported goods at a much higher rate than domestic goods. South Carolina declared the tariff null and void, and threatened to secede from the Union if the federal government enforced it.
The crisis was resolved when Jackson passed the Force Bill, which allowed him to use military force to collect taxes. This was a significant blow to the States' rights movement because it showed that the federal government was willing to use force to maintain its authority.
Other examples of the States' rights debate include the Missouri Compromise, which dealt with the issue of slavery in the territories, and the Dred Scott decision, which declared that slaves were not citizens of the United States.
Leaders of the States' rights movement included figures like John C. Calhoun and Robert Barnwell Rhett, while leaders of the Federalist movement included George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and John Adams.
For more question on federalism
https://brainly.com/question/985210
#SPJ8
What African American institution was founded during the Second Great Awakening?
Which of the following is a system
where the powers of the government
are divided between the national and
state governments?
A. Federalism
B. Socialism
C. Confederalism
In two to three paragraphs, summarize the importance of Carl Vinson and President Franklin D. Roosevelt and their impact on Georgia. Include key ideas and details from the lesson and the reading in your response. Access your reading here.
From 1914 through 1965, Carl Vinson served as Georgia's representative in the House and was a member of the Democratic Party. "The Father of the Two-Ocean Navy" was his nickname. He has served in the US House of Representatives the longest of any Georgian representative.
Carl Vinson was a politician from the United States who spent more than 50 years in the House of Representatives and had a significant impact on the growth of the American Navy in the 20th century. From 1914 through 1965, he served as Georgia's representative in the House and was a member of the Democratic Party.
"The Father of the Two-Ocean Navy" was Carl Vinson. He has served in the US House of Representatives the longest of any Georgian representative. He was the longest-serving member of the US House of Representatives, holding the position of Dean from 1961 to 1965.
Learn more about Carl Vinson here:
https://brainly.com/question/9054073
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements was true about radio in the 1920's? A. News on the radio was immediate and instantaneous. B. Many radio stations failed to advertise during their programming. C. Radio replaced the telephone in homes. D. Radio stations only played music.
The true statement about radio in the 1920s is:
A. News on the radio was immediate and instantaneous.
The truth about radioDuring the 1920s, radio broadcasting played a significant role in disseminating news and information to the public. Radio stations would broadcast news bulletins, updates, and live reports, allowing people to receive news in a more immediate and timely manner compared to other forms of media at that time.
This instant delivery of news was one of the key factors that contributed to the growing popularity of radio during the 1920s.
Read more on radio here https://brainly.com/question/69373
#SPJ1
was the Vietnam War contrary to the spirit of the Great Society, or an extension of it?
Answer:
Instead of being a part of the Great Society, the Vietnam War can be seen as something that goes against it. The Vietnam War was a military conflict that took place in a different country, while the Great Society was focused on fixing problems at home and making life better for Americans through social programs.
The cost of the war took money away from the programs of the Great Society, making them less powerful and effective. Also, the war caused deep splits in American society and hurt the sense of unity and shared goals that were needed to reach the goals of the Great Society.
Also, the Great Society was built on the ideas of social justice, equality, and human rights. Many people thought that the Vietnam War went against these ideas. People said that the war was bad because it hurt civilians and caused a lot of damage and deaths.
So, we can say that the Vietnam War was not an extension of the Great Society, but instead went against its goals.
Answer:
Vietnam war is an extension of great society
Was Emperor Qin Shi Huangdi Harsh Tyrant or
Brilliant Administrator?
This is an opinion based answer so there is no wrong answer, id say that Qin Shi Huangdi was a brilliant administrator due to his most common accomplishment, his army
Answer:
brilliant administrator
Explanation:
How did mayor phelans article reveal his prejudice?
Phelan created his prejudiced idea that Japanese were unvetted subversives who posed a greater threat to white Americans than black people, who lacked a same talent for discipline and sectors as the East.
What distinguishes discrimination from prejudice?Stereotypes help breed prejudice. Based on social identification groupings, discrimination is harmful, destructive, and exclusionary behavior and action toward a person or group of individuals (race, gender, sex, ethnicity, class, etc.) Discrimination is detrimental and prevents people or groups from gaining power.
What factors lead to prejudice?Prejudice's psychological underpinnings People's core beliefs, how they view themselves and other people, sense of cultural identity, and social standards that specify who is accepted into or rejected from social groupings are a few examples of these.
To know more about Prejudice visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28190332
#SPJ1
Which statement is true about the relationship between a monopoly and its competition in a market?
Monopolies are formed when businesses buy out their competition in a market.
Competition in the market helps monopolies to develop.
Competition in the market ensures that monopolies charge fair prices.
Monopolies thrive when they have competition.
Monopolies are usually formed when a business becomes the sole provider of a product or service, often by buying out its competition. Competition often prevents monopolies as it encourages price fairness and diversity in the market.
Explanation:The correct statement about the relationship between a monopoly and its competition in a market is 'Monopolies are formed when businesses buy out their competition in a market'. A monopoly exists when a specific individual or an enterprise is the only supplier of a particular product or service. Because of this absence of competition, a monopoly can charge whatever price it wants and is not subject to market demands.
However, it’s important to note that monopolies can also form through other means, such as when a company has exclusive ownership over a resource. Competition typically prevents monopolies as it encourages diversity and fair pricing.
Learn more about monopolies and competition here:https://brainly.com/question/34891462
What elements of Roman
civilization are part of your
daily life?
A typical Roman day would begin with a quick breakfast before moving on to work. When work was over in the early afternoon, many Romans would quickly travel to the baths to take a bath and socialize.
What aspects of Roman culture have survived to the present day?Despite the fact that the Roman Empire was at its height thousands of years ago, its influence may still be seen in our culture's literature, architecture, technology, art, and legal system. The ancient Romans left their impact on our world in a variety of ways, such as through books, stadiums, bridges, and the language we use today.
How does living today compare to life in ancient Rome?The Romans staged cultural events, constructed and stocked libraries, and offered healthcare, just like our contemporary society does. While the kids went to school, others gathered in town centers to read the news written on stone tablets. Laws were enacted by the government to safeguard its inhabitants.
To know more about Roman civilization visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/19624491
#SPJ13
what makes a society complex?
(list reasons)
please help with this
Answer:
Examples of common characteristics of a complex society include religion, job specialization, cities, government, language and writing systems, technology, and social hierarchy.
Explanation:
How did the immigrant experiences differ for various groups-
Northern Europeans, Southern Europeans, Asians?
Asian immigrants were more discriminated on than other European immigrants. They even had laws that limited Asian immigrants from coming into the country. With the Immigration Act of 1924 it completely excluded any immigrant from Asia to come into the United States. Europeans were packed into boats and shipped to the US and got examined at Ellis Island and let into the US, while the Chinese were held for months on Angel Island to just get approval to get into the country.
How many miles would it take to ship products from New York to San Francisco by ship without the Panama Canal?
Can someone help me with colonialism history and I WILL GIVE BRAINILEST PLS
what do you need help on?-
Compare and contrast the treatment of people with mental health problems in ancient Greece with the moral treatment movement of the eighteenth century.
Answer:
ancient Greeks don't care to mentally ill people whereas due to moral treatment movement, now care should be provided to mentally ill people.
Explanation:
The ancient Greeks who were marked with mental illness were often avoided, locked up, or sometimes put to death due to their severe dangerous behaviour towards normal people while on the other hand, moral treatment movement of the eighteenth century provides treatment to the mentally ill people and also provides care to these people in order to adapt their environment.
.Which event sparked the protest movement known as the Arab Spring?
Free speech was declared illegal in Iran.
Ayatollah Khomeini became the ruler of Iran.
A young man tragically killed himself in Tunisia.
The six states of the Arabian peninsula united.
The event that sparked the protest movement known as the Arab Spring was when a young man tragically killed himself in Tunisia. Thus option (C) is correct.
What was Arab Spring?
The Arab Spring was a series of pro-democracy uprisings and demonstrations that took place in several countries in the Middle East and North Africa starting in 2010. The protests were largely driven by frustration with authoritarian regimes, corruption, economic hardship, and lack of political freedoms.
The first protests took place in Tunisia in December 2010, after a young street vendor named Mohamed Bouazizi set himself on fire in protest of police harassment and economic hardship. The protests quickly spread throughout the country and eventually led to the ousting of longtime dictator.
When a young man tragically killed himself in Tunisia, it led sparked the protest movement known as the Arab Spring. Therefore. option (C) is correct.
Learn more about Arab Spring here:
https://brainly.com/question/9535949
#SPJ7
American life changed dramatically during the first part of the nineteenth century. The United States' economy changed from a subsistence economy to a market economy. What does that mean and why did it happen? Write a well-constructed essay that: 1) Explains the difference between a subsistence economy and a market economy. 2) Explains the reasons why the shift to a market economy occurred. 3) Briefly describes the adjustments in manufacturing, agriculture, transportation, and communication that took place in each section of the country during this period. Which of these changes and Innovations helped unite the country and why? ( Please do not repost someone else's answer on brianly or from any other websites to answer my question). Will Mark Brainliest
Answer:
A market economy is based on money while a subsistence economy is not. In a subsistence economy, goods are produced to provide for oneself or one’s family. In other words, subsistence economies are based around self-sufficiency whereas a market economy is based around profit. In a market economy, goods are made and sold to make money. The main causes of the switch to a market economy were many technological advances in transportation and growing demand and employment in factory jobs.
This rapid change in the market system contributed to capitalist-focused ideals. This ultimately leads to economic activity throughout the nation. Although the market economy changed many things economically speaking, it also heavily affected society in America. After the war in 1812, the country wanted to expand into the western territories. A large system of railroads and canals was developed in order to distribute manufactured goods to new markets. For example, The Erie Canal was developed in 1825. This connected New York to mid-west cities by canals going through the Great Lakes. At this time, railroads were one of the fastest-growing industries in America. It become one of the largest employers and also helped support other industries such as coal, lumber, and oil.
The Market economy affected each part of the country differently. The advantages depended on location and way of transportation. For example, the Southern states were developed on big flat riverbeds and temperate winters. This resulted in great farmland and many farms spread out over the land. However, in the Northern states, there were shorter, rockier coasts. As well as less tolerant winters. There were shorter crop seasons and the soil could not grow nearly as many variations of crops. The good thing was that in the Northern and Middle states there were several strong mineral deposits. The southern region was able to support itself on agriculture but the north had to rely on imports. The trip from Europe was closer to the northern ports, so the landing points for potential immigrants from Europe were more common. Because of the European immigrants, there were many European industries that flourished in the North like furniture, glassblowing, and metallurgy. IN the south, their industries and economy greatly benefited from the climate as well as a diverse range of crops brought in from Africa.
Manufacturing, transportation, and communication all were very important when it came to uniting the country. On one hand, there are manufacturing goods from different cultures that would help support a certain environment in a different area. The ‘help your neighbor’ mentality brought many societies together. Though, not forgetting the importance of profit. Transportation did the same thing in a sense. It allowed direct forms of interaction in an easier way that brought all places in the country together. Even if those places were in completely different areas. Communication improved a lot during this time period. As transportation improved, so did ways to communicate. Innovations like the penny press and the electrical telegraph were developed during the market revolution that changed connections throughout the country.
What is the primary role of the United States Burea of Countererrorism
Answer:
The Bureau of Counterterrorism's mission is to promote U.S. national security by taking a leading role in developing coordinated strategies and approaches to defeat terrorism abroad and securing the counterterrorism cooperation of international partners.
Explanation:
Why wasn't South Carolina upset when part of her land was given to Georgia?
Answer:
Because they were glad for the additional settlements between themselves and Spanish Florida
STORIES OF USEFUL INVENTIONS, excerpt
By S. E. Forman
1911
THE MATCH
There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when men did not know how to kindle fire; and after they learned how to kindle one, it was a long, long time before they learned how to kindle one easily. In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match; but we must remember that the match is one of the most wonderful things in the world, and that it took men thousands of years to learn how to make one. Let us learn the history of this familiar little object, the match.
Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble.
In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar.
Why does the author include details about the difficulty of getting fire before matches?
To explain how fire was used
To explain how fire was created
To show how matches were made
To show the need for matches
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The author's explanation of how fire was difficult to get before matches helps them transition into how matches are easily used today to help us create fires.
The largest civil rights movement by people of Mexican descent in the United States is known as what?
The largest civil rights movement by people of Mexican descent in the United States is known as the Chicano Movement. The Chicano Movement was a social and political movement that emerged during the 1960s and 1970s to address the inequalities and injustices faced by Mexican Americans in the United States. The movement was characterized by a focus on self-determination, cultural pride, and community empowerment, and it played a significant role in shaping modern-day Chicano/a/x culture and politics.