Why were early Americans, who were so eager for a unified legal system, reluctant to establish the ultimate legal authority in the federal government?
They believed that some state laws could be in opposition to federal law.
They did not want so much power in one branch.
They believed that only the individual states could set criminal laws.
American settlers had trouble trusting any organized group with its laws.
Answers
Answer:
Not everyone agrees on how much power the judicial branch should have. After all, federal judges and justices are appointed, not elected. As most Americans believe in democracy, shouldn't elected officials run the country?
On the other hand, perhaps American government would be fairer if judges had even more power. Because they do not have to worry about reelection, they are relieved of the outside pressure of public opinion.
After all, the majority is not always right. It is no accident that the Founders provided for elected officials in the legislature and appointed officials in the judiciary. They believed that freedom, equality, and justice are best achieved by a balance between the two branches of government.
Checks on Judicial Power
Trail of Tears
Although the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee, its decision was not enforced. Nearly 4,000 Cherokee died on the Trail of Tears as a result of the Indian removals.
The president and Congress have some control of the judiciary with their power to appoint and confirm appointments of judges and justices. Congress also may impeach judges (only seven have actually been removed from office), alter the organization of the federal court system, and amend the Constitution.
Congress can also get around a court ruling by passing a slightly different law than one previously declared unconstitutional.
Courts also have limited power to implement the decisions that they make. For example, if the president or another member of the executive branch chooses to ignore a ruling, there is very little that the federal courts can do about it.
For example, the Supreme Court ruled against the removal of the Cherokee from their native lands in 1831. President Andrew Jackson disagreed. He proceeded with the removal of the Cherokee, and the Supreme Court was powerless to enforce its decision.
The Power of the Courts
Integration of Central High School, Little Rock, Arkansas, 1957
Will Counts/AP
The 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka regarding integration of schools was not enforced until three years later, when Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, was integrated. Elizabeth Eckford, one of the first African American students to attend Central, was heckled on her way to school each morning.
The federal courts' most important power is that of judicial review, the authority to interpret the Constitution. When federal judges rule that laws or government actions violate the spirit of the Constitution, they profoundly shape public policy. For example, federal judges have declared over 100 federal laws unconstitutional.
Another measure of the Supreme Court's power is its ability to overrule itself. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka that schools segregated by race were unconstitutional. This reversed the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that upheld the doctrine of "separate but equal."
For the most part, though, federal courts do have a great deal of respect for previous decisions. A very strong precedent called stare decisis ("let the decision stand") directs judges to be cautious about overturning decisions made by past courts.
An act of the legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void.... It is emphatically the province of the judicial department to say what the law is.John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Words which, ordinarily and in many places, would be within the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment, may become subject to prohibition when of such a nature and used in such circumstances as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils which Congress has a right to prevent. The character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done.Oliver Wendell Holmes, Schenck v. the United States (1919)
The judgments below, except that, in the Delaware case, are accordingly reversed, and the cases are remanded to the District Courts to take such proceedings and enter such orders and decrees consistent with this opinion as are necessary and proper to admit to public schools on a racially nondiscriminatory basis with all deliberate speed the parties to these cases.Earl Warren, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1955)
Explanation:
please mark as brainliest
Answer:
They did not want so much power in one branch.
Explanation:
Just took the quiz :) Hope this helps
Related Questions
What is the importance of studying criminology in the social science
Answers
Answer: They conduct research, teach and work with different kinds of law enforcement agencies.
They also study the social and psychological factors that cause people to commit crimes and research which approaches to rehabilitation work and maybe do not work.
Explanation:
What is an example of contractionary economic policy?
A) Lowering the interest rate at which banks borrow money
B) Increases to the corporate tax rate
C) Executive orders that reduce regulations on businesses
D) Spending programs aimed at repairing infrastructure
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation: Increases to the corporate tax rate
The United States Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. Every law, executive order, and Supreme Court decision has to be consistent and in line with the Constitution. However, even though the Constitution is easily accessible to the public, there is much confusion and misconception about what the Constitution says. Why is it important to understand what the Constitution actually says? How can we increase public awareness of what the Constitution actually states?
Answers
It is important to understand what the Constitution actually says because it serves as the foundation of the United States government and outlines the rights and freedoms of its citizens.
By knowing and comprehending its content, individuals can actively participate in the democratic process, hold elected officials accountable, and make informed decisions about legal and political matters. Understanding the Constitution also promotes respect for the rule of law and helps prevent the erosion of constitutional rights through misinformation or misinterpretation.
To increase public awareness of what the Constitution actually states, education and civic engagement are key. Schools should prioritize teaching the Constitution as part of their curriculum, ensuring students develop a fundamental understanding of its principles.
Public campaigns, media outlets, and social platforms can also play a crucial role in promoting constitutional literacy by providing accurate information and promoting discussions on constitutional issues. Organizations and institutions can organize seminars, workshops, and community events to engage citizens in meaningful dialogue about the Constitution, its significance, and its implications for their everyday lives.
Learn more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
What reasons did the president give for justifying his claim of executive privilege?
Answers
Answer:
To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.
Explanation:
Who is the JA director of the ReaperAaron BA?
Answers
Answer:
What is JA, ReaperAaron, and BA?
Explanation:
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending before the judge. Judge Woods immediately reported this to the state's attorney and was asked to play along with Strickland until the actual payment of money occurred. Strickland gave $2,500 to the judge, who promptly turned it over to the state's attorney's office. Strickland was indicted for bribery, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a four-year prison term. Three months after the criminal trial, Strickland filed a motion for the return of his $2,500. Will the court order the return of his money
Answers
Answer:
No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.
Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.
Explanation:
Which statement best completes the diagram of the ways the different
branches of government can limit each other's power?
Answers
Answer:
can purpose amendments to the constitution to overturn a Supreme Court decision
The burden of proof in civil cases is fairly low. A plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and then he collects 100 percent of his damages. Is this result reasonable
Answers
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.
Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.
In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.
Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
Small businesses who can't afford an IT department can benefit from _____, as it avoids the complexity of software installation, maintenance, upgrades, and patches.
Answers
Small businesses who can't afford an IT department can benefit from cloud computing, as it avoids the complexity of software installation, maintenance, upgrades, and patches.
Businesses can access and use software programs, data storage, and computing resources via the internet thanks to cloud computing. Businesses have the option of using cloud based services and platforms offered by outside vendors in place of installing software on individual computers or servers. Because of this, companies are no longer required to manage the technical aspects of software management.
Small businesses can use the infrastructure and know-how of cloud service providers, who take care of software installation, updates, security, and maintenance tasks, by using cloud computing. Small businesses no longer have to manage their own IT infrastructure, which lowers costs and frees them up to concentrate on their core operations.
For small businesses without dedicated IT departments, cloud computing is an appealing option because of its scalability, flexibility, and affordability.
Learn more about Small businesses at:
brainly.com/question/32165266
#SPJ4
can you all helping me
Answers
Answer:
5. Homicide. X assaulted Y, causing them to fall into the water and drown. This is homicide, even if unintentional.
6. Yes. B is an accessory to murdxr/raxe. It's called "accomplice liability."
NOTE: This is going to vary by region. I am also not a lawyer.
Can a prisoner sue me
Answers
What areas does the states laws impact statewide
Answers
Answer:
All State governments are modeled after the Federal Government and consist of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The U.S. Constitution mandates that all States uphold a “republican form” of government, although the three-branch structure is not required.
Explanation:
pls mark as brain list
A program manager implemented a new policy designed to increase productivity. Productivity went up after the new policy was implemented. on Based on the above statements, is the following conclusion true, false, or is there not enough information to determine? The new policy designed to increase productivity worked. O True O False O Not Enough Information
Answers
True, the new policy designed to increase productivity worked. Based solely on the information given, we can conclude that the new policy was successful in increasing productivity.
The given statements suggest that a program manager implemented a new policy aimed at increasing productivity. After the implementation of the new policy, productivity went up. From these statements, we can infer that the new policy had a positive impact on productivity.
While it's possible that other factors could have contributed to the increase in productivity, the information provided supports the conclusion that the new policy was effective in achieving its intended goal of increasing productivity.
Of course, there may be additional details or data that could shed further light on the situation. For example, it would be useful to know more about the specific policy that was implemented, as well as how the program manager measured productivity before and after the policy was put in place.
Learn more about productivity: https://brainly.com/question/30333196.
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Which statement correctly describes a delinquent?
A.
a young person
B.
a young person who has committed a crime
C.
any person who has served a prison sentence
D.
any person who has faced a criminal trial
it criminology
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Deliquets are young kids who have commited crimes
Answer:
B.) a young person who has committed a crime
Is the state and government the same? Please substantiate your answer.(
Answers
a state can be distinguished from a government. The state is the organization while the government is a particular group of people, administrative bureaucracy that controls the state apparatus at a given time. That is, governments are the means through which state power is employed.
quizlet For prisoners, cases based on Sixth Amendment rights involve the right to a speedy trial and the problem of:
Answers
For prisoners, cases based on Sixth Amendment rights involve the right to a speedy trial and the problem of access to legal counsel. The Sixth Amendment guarantees individuals accused of a crime the right to a speedy and public trial.
This means that prisoners have the right to have their cases resolved promptly, without unnecessary delays. In addition, the right to a speedy trial ensures that the accused does not spend an excessive amount of time in jail before their case is heard.
Furthermore, prisoners face the problem of accessing legal counsel. The Sixth Amendment also guarantees the right to legal representation. However, many prisoners, especially those who cannot afford an attorney, struggle to obtain competent legal counsel. This can lead to a disadvantage in the legal process, as prisoners may not have the necessary resources or knowledge to effectively defend themselves.
In summary, prisoners' cases based on Sixth Amendment rights involve the right to a speedy trial, which ensures timely resolution of their cases, and the problem of accessing legal counsel, which can impact their ability to receive fair representation.
To know more about Sixth Amendment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ11
What is the effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing? They take a huge financial hit, deterring them from repeating the crime. The fine they pay is much less than the profit they made from their crime. They must refund all the money they made from their crime. The fine is a penalty that causes most of them to go out of business
Answers
Option A: The effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing is that they suffer a severe financial loss, which discourages them from doing the offense again.
Companies that are found guilty of price fixing can face severe financial consequences as a result of fines, which can act as a strong deterrence to such offenses in the future.
Depending on the seriousness of the offense and the size of the organization implicated, these fines may reach millions or even billions of dollars. The notion is that the fine must be severe enough to deter the corporation from repeating the same anticompetitive behavior.
The objective is to deter the corporation from participating in unlawful acts that hurt customers and other businesses rather than forcing them out of business.
Learn more about price fixing at
https://brainly.com/question/13062335
#SPJ4
The question is -
What is the effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing?
a. They take a huge financial hit, deterring them from repeating the crime.
b. The fine they pay is much less than the profit they made from their crime.
c. They must refund all the money they made from their crime.
d. The fine is a penalty that causes most of them to go out of business.
who decides if a person can have rights
Answers
Answer:
International Human Rights Law; I've had a quizlet like a hour ago. I think that was the answer
Answer:
The international Human Rights law
Explanation:
what policy is threatening to use nuclear weapons if a communist country tries to seize territory by force?
Answers
Answer: The policy threatening to use nuclear weapons if a communist country tries to seize territory by force is known as "nuclear deterrence," which is based on the concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD).
Explanation:
The policy threatening to use nuclear weapons if a communist country tries to seize territory by force is known as "nuclear deterrence," which is based on the concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD). This policy was developed during the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, and it asserted that each country had enough nuclear weapons to cause unacceptable damage to the other if attacked. This concept was meant to dissuade either side from engaging in hostile acts, such as attempting to take territory by force.
During the Cold War, the United States and its allies attempted to use the policy of nuclear deterrence to prevent communist countries from taking territory by force. For example, during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, the United States threatened to use nuclear weapons if Cuba or the Soviet Union moved forward with plans to send additional nuclear missiles to Cuba. Similarly, the United States threatened to use nuclear weapons if North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950.
While the policy of nuclear deterrence has been successful in discouraging communist countries from taking territory by force in the past, critics argue that its unchecked use could be dangerous. However, nuclear deterrence remains an important policy tool in preventing the hostile takeover of other countries.
Your client, who is ninety-five years old, first contacted you in 2009 to complete her Last Will and Testament, which you did. However, she started to contact you regularly in 2011 in the middle of dementia saying that she wanted to leave everything to her mother. Now, she has insisted on completing a new will leaving everything to her mother, and you proceed with it to make your client happy, but also because you know that this final version of the will is not valid under the defense to formation of duress. True False
Answers
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Cohesion is the term that justifies the invalidation of an act, because that act has or was performed on illegal grounds. A testament cannot be an invalid claiming coercion, even if the person who issued it has dementia or another problem that impedes their abilities.
A testament represents an individual's last will and shows what he wants to happen after his death. The will is a legal document and valid in any situation.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Which of the following is a high risk area for compliance issues
Answers
Cyber Security and Data Protection is a high risk area for compliance issues. The development of technology has brought new difficulties and risks associated with compliance issues.
Although it can be challenging for organizations to consistently remain on top of these challenges, issues like risk area data protection and cybersecurity rank among the top worries in the compliance space. A campus activity (which could be a process, department, or function) is considered high risk if it poses risks to the institution's capacity to fulfil its goals and objectives, particularly those relating to compliance issues with all laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures. Fraud, theft, bribery, money laundering.
To learn more about compliance issues, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/27960340
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answers
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Growing up in a rough neighborhood, Xavier learned to hotwire cars in order to get them started. He and his friends would look for an unlocked car, hotwire it, and go for a joyride if they were bored. He gathered knowledge on many kinds of cars. If given the opportunity, Xavier could take almost any car on the street he wanted. Into what class of criminal would Xavier MOST likely fall?
professional thief
persistent thief
shoplifter
occasional offender
Answers
The kind of Criminal that Xavier is going to be classified as going by this narrative is a persistent thief.
Who is a persistent thief?
This is a person that is known to continue stealing people's properties even though they have been successful before.
Unlike the professional thief, they do not steal in order to get paid. They continue in crime even though they may have tried to stop.
Read more on thieves here: https://brainly.com/question/26019827
true/false. a decrease in government expenditures serves as an example of an adverse supply shock.
Answers
False. A decrease in government expenditures is not an adverse supply shock.
An adverse supply shock refers to an unexpected event that disrupts the supply chain and leads to a decrease in the availability of goods and services, causing an increase in their prices. Examples of adverse supply shocks include natural disasters, wars, and trade restrictions.
A decrease in government expenditures, on the other hand, is a deliberate policy decision to reduce government spending, which can have various impacts on the economy depending on the context and timing of the decision.
In some cases, it may lead to a reduction in aggregate demand, while in others, it may free up resources for private investment and stimulate economic growth.
Know more about "adverse supply shock".
https://brainly.com/question/28482236
#SPJ11
How do you get into the restricted section in Hogwarts Legacy?
Answers
Currently, there is no known way to get into the restricted section in Hogwarts Legacy. The developers have not yet released any information on how to access this area.
The restricted section in Hogwarts Legacy is a hidden area of the school that is off-limits to students. It is located in the dungeons beneath the Hogwarts castle, and is home to a number of powerful magical artifacts and creatures.
The restricted section is guarded by a series of magical enchantments, and only those with the highest levels of magical ability are able to enter. It is believed to contain many powerful and dangerous artifacts, such as cursed artifacts and Horcruxes, as well as creatures such as Acromantulas and Basilisks.
Until more is revealed, the only way to explore the restricted section is to wait for new updates or DLCs that may provide access to this area.
To learn more about restricted section in Hogwarts Legacy link is here
brainly.com/question/30700967
#SPJ4
Approximately what percent of all cases reaching it does the us Supreme Court reject each year as unworthy of review. 98. Upgrade to remove ads.
Answers
Approximately 98% of all cases reaching the US Supreme Court are rejected each year as unworthy of review. The Supreme Court has the power to choose which cases it wants to hear and will only hear a small fraction of the cases brought to it.
This process of selecting cases is known as the writ of certiorari, which is issued when four out of the nine Supreme Court justices vote to hear a case. In 2019, the Supreme Court received around 7,000 requests for certiorari but only granted 74 cases. This means that approximately 99% of cases were rejected by the court. This demonstrates the selective nature of the Supreme Court and highlights the importance of choosing cases that have a significant impact on the legal system or society as a whole.
For more such questions on Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/1046966
#SPJ11
Es un organismo Humanitario imparcial de carácter internacional que ofrece sus servicios a las partes en conflicto armado, protegiendo a las victimas de la guerra y de la violencia interna.
Answers
Answer:
Can you do it in English
हेर्दैमा सुन्दर एवम् विशाल
खुसुक्क
अठोट
होनहार
ज्यादै सिपालु
वेकार
खित्का
सुटुक्क
प्रसिद्ध
हठ
रसिलो
नामद
बेसरी हाँस्दाको आवाज
सङ्कल्प58
काम नलाग्ने
भव्य
जिही
Answers
Beautiful and huge looking
Khusukk
Determination
Promising
Very skillful
Useless
खित्का
Silently
Famous
Stubbornness
Juicy
Nominee
The sound of laughter
Resolution 58
Not working
Grand
Jihi
How come no one except me (in texas) cares about masks. there are new dangorus veriants that the vacene can not protect you from.
Answers
If God wants us to be happy for who we are then can't we just be happy for us being LGBTQ+
Answers
Answer:
because god did not create us to be lgbtq he created man and women. and for them to go together only but god still loves you if you are lgbtq it is a sin but so is lying ive lied and so have you we are the same no matter the sin its simple love the sinner not the sin god loves no matter what you are whether you support trump or biden it doesnt matter he loves us all the same:)
Explanation:
Answer:
im pansexual so like and i agree lgbtq people and everyone else is perfect in gods eyes
Explanation: