Answer:
The Byzantine Empire was located close to the Slavs of Eastern Europe. As Slavic and Viking culture mixed to form Russia, new trade centers were formed, such as the city of Kiev. This trade helped improve the wealth and power of Russia and led to cultural diffusion with Byzantine culture.
Explanation:
The key issue of the 1945 Potsdam
Conference was which of the
following?
A. what to do with what was left of Nazi Germany
B. what to do in the aftermath of the atomic bomb
C. how to defeat Hitler and the Nazis
Answer: A
Explanation: Because after they defeated them they split them up but they didnt know what to do with them after that.
When was duma formed
Answer:
Explanation:
The Duma was formed in 1906 in Russia as a result of the Russian Revolution of 1905. It was the first elected parliament in Russia's history.
One of the outcomes of the Congress of Vienna was that they forced rulers to share power with their people.
true or false
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Who is known as the first sports agent? A. George Herman B. Christy Walsh C. C. C. Pyle D. Bill Hayes
Answer:
In 1925, Charles Pyle negotiated a $3,000 per-game contract for Harold ... player ever.2 In 1929, sports agent Christy Walsh, advised baseball Hall-of-Famer ... deal of press coverage was given to Hollywood movie producer J. William Hayes, ... He called first to make an appointment.
PART B: Which passage from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
A. "Some of the founders wanted to select a President by popular vote, but others did not
want to put that much power into the hands of the voters." (Paragraph 3)
B. "Today many people believe that the Electoral College is out of date..." (Paragraph 4)
C. "...if a candidate wins small states by large numbers and loses large states by narrow
margins, it is possible to gain more votes than an opponent and win fewer electoral
votes." (Paragraph 5)
D. "The Constitution originally said little about presidential succession. It only specified
that powers and duties should 'devolve on the Vice President.'" (Paragraph 6)
The Vice President of the United States serves as President of the Senate according to the Constitution.
What About the Vice President (President of the Senate)?The Vice President of the United States serves as President of the Senate according to the Constitution. The vice president not only preside but also officially preside over the receiving and counting of the electoral votes cast in presidential elections. This is in addition to having the sole authority to break a tie vote in the Senate.From 1789 until the 1950s, the vice president's main responsibility was to preside over the Senate; today, they act as the president's main counselors. Vice presidents have worked in buildings close to the Senate Chamber since since the 1830s. As vice presidents and senators experimented with and at times vehemently argued the role to be played by this constitutional officer, the vice president's influence changed over the course of the country's history.To Learn more About Vice President refer To:
https://brainly.com/question/15895219
#SPJ1
Which of the following presidents
was in office when portions of the
National Park System were sold to
lumberjacks?
A. Teddy Roosevelt
B. William Taft
C. William McKinley
D. Herbert Hgover
PLS HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
The progressive movement grew out of the _________ movement of the late 1800s. *
a.Independence
b.Anti-immigration
c.Populist
d.Whig
Answer:
I think its B. The internet says it grew from key movements of the time fought for women's suffrage, limits on child labor, abolition, temperance, and prison reform.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is B
Explanation:DID IT ON EDGE 2021 Brainliest pls?
14)
Which number on the timeline represents the era in which the Mauryan Empire collapsed?
The correct answer is B. 5 (200 BCE - 100 BCE)
Explanation
The image shows a timeline divided into six periods, the first from 500BCE backward, the second from 500BCE to 400BCE, the third from 400BCE to 300BCE, the fourth from 300BCE to 200BCE, the fifth from 200BCE to 100BCE, and the sixth from 100BCE onwards.
On the other hand, The Maurya Empire the first unified empire of India (320 BC - 185 BC) that spread throughout the north and center of the current territory of India and some areas of the current countries of Afghanistan and Pakistan. According to the dates of foundation and decline of this Empire, it can be said that its decline 185 BC. C. coincides with the period 5 of time that spans from the year 200BCE to the 100BCE that includes the year 185BCE. So the correct answer is B. 5 (200 BCE - 100 BCE)
Use the following map and choose the name of the colony for the numbers posted on the map.
New York
Pennsylvania
Maryland
Delaware
New Jersey
Delaware:#4New York:#1Maryland:#5Pennsylvania:#2New Jersey:#3nation:
body of evidence of women civil protests from 1950 to 1990 in South africa
The African National Congress used grassroots mobilization in the 1950s to fight against tightening racial restrictions.
Women were crucial in promoting the leadership of women and instigating the inclusion of women's problems in the greater democratic movement. Women of all races were together by the recently established Federation of South African Women to campaign for equality.
The federation began locally and eventually grew throughout the nation by organizing inside labor unions and from street to street. These grassroots initiatives sparked several local protests, which culminated in the women's march on the capital of Pretoria in 1956. However, despite their efforts, the government continued to apply the pass restrictions to African women.
Learn more about women civil protests in 1950 here:
https://brainly.com/question/32317423
#SPJ1
Where has the ebola virus infected humans?
1. Throughout the world
2. Africa, Italy, and the Philippines
3. Africa and the United States
4. Only Africa
what are two ways that the soviet people lost their freedom due to communism in the soviet union ?
How does the Sun help support life on Earth? What things come from the Sun that can be harmful to life, and what
protection does our planet have against these?
Answer:
here is the answer
Explanation:
The sun gives us vitamin D which helps us regulate the amount of calcium and phosphate in the body. These nutrients are needed to keep bones, teeth and muscles healthy.
Apart from all the good things from the sun,it produces ULTRAVIOLET RADITIONS which harm life on earth Short-wave of ultraviolet light damages DNA and sterilizes surfaces with which it comes into contact. For humans, suntan and sunburn are familiar effects of exposure of the skin to UV light, along with an increased risk of skin cancer.
Our planet has a type of blanket it is known as the atmosphere it has 5 layers one of them is known as the stratosphere which has some gas layer called the ozone layer,this ozone layer stops the ultraviolet radiation from reaching our home planet.
why was texas beneficial to the south during the civil war.
will give brainlest
Answer:
Because they provided the most supplies which really helped them during the war.
Explanation:
Being the largest state and all, it contributed to a huge amount of military supplies which the South couldn’t really get due to the Union Blockade. Of course, even with good war material, they still lost.
Describe life in a typical mission settlement in Texas. What were some of the most common jobs and what did the settlers do for fun?
Answer
The settlements had their own elected officials and governed themselves for the most part. The two most common jobs in mission settlements were farming and ranching. People also were merchants, fisherman, tailors and so on. All the jobs necessary to make the settlement function were done. For fun the settlers held horse races and other sporting events. They also conducted dances and different activities for recreation. Life was challenging in the settlements but there was always room for fun.
Explanation: i got it wrong and it gave me this
What was significant about the Battle of New Orleans? Check all of the boxes that apply. It was fought after the peace treaty was signed. It was the battle in which the Americans had the highest casualties. Andrew Jackson became an American hero.
a and c .............................
Answer:
A and C because I got it correct
Explanation:
six states changed from democrat to republican between the 2012 and 2016 elections. of these six states, which of the following pairs would have swung the 2016 election the other way if they had both voted democrat?
Six states in total given that it possesses more electoral votes than any other country—55—California is a prime example of a swing state that may "swing" an election either way.
Prior to the 2016 Presidential election, Republicans were more inclined to assert that the political system no longer supports individuals with real objectives. Following the 2016 election, the organisation most likely to assert that the system failed was the conservative Press space. The two primary concepts that the Electoral College first proposed to the Constitutional convention as a compromise were the famous election of the President and the election of the President through Congress. On July 26, 2016, Hillary Clinton was formally nominated for president. The next day, Tim Kaine, a senator from Virginia, was named as the front-runner for vice president. On November 8, 2016, Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for president, defeated Clinton despite winning the popular vote.
Learn more about Votes at
https://brainly.com/question/30028609
#SPJ4
who is responsible for the first world war
Answer:
The responsibility for the First World War is a complex and controversial issue. While there is no one single cause, many historians argue that a combination of factors, including nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and the complex web of alliances that existed between European powers, contributed to the outbreak of the war. Ultimately, the war was the result of a complex set of circumstances and decisions made by many different actors, and it is difficult to attribute responsibility to any one individual or country.
Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679): People are naturally selfish and evil; without a strong civilizing government to restrain humanity's violent impulses, the "state of nature" is a "war of all against all" and life is "nasty, brutish, and short."
John Locke (1632–1704): People are born blank slates, neither good nor bad. For that reason, each generation must take great care what environment they raise the next generation in, because everything they think will be based on what they are taught by people and circumstances.
John-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778): People are born naturally good and civilization corrupts them. If people could just ignore the confusing influence of social conventions and follow their natural instincts the world would be much better.
For this assignment, you will need to follow the essay format as made famous by Michel de Montaigne. He is credited with creating the essay, which literally comes from the French word for "trial," as in a weighing of evidence—so you can blame Montaigne for the essay.
Step 1
Start by evaluating the three positions outlined above, one at a time. For each, consider evidence that supports it and evidence that raises a problem for it. This is your personal reflection, so you can do research but for your evidence you may also just use your personal observations: have you seen yourself and others demonstrate natural goodness, badness, or neutrality?
Step 2
Having considered each, identify which of the three positions makes the most sense to you and explain why. This should be based on more than what you would like it to be. What makes one position's evidence stronger to you than the others? You need to explain this.
Step 3
For your final paragraph, you need to address a specific problem with the position you picked in step 2, as follows:
If you chose humans are naturally bad, how can any government be trusted if it consists of humans?
If you chose humans are naturally neutral, does that mean no one is ultimately responsible for their actions because they are just a product of their environment—what about historical figures who stood up to their societies and said something was wrong?
If you chose humans are naturally good, why are laws of any kind necessary?
Your assignment here is to write out your thoughts on the question of human nature, not provide the final answer. So think deeply about these ideas, but don't stress if you're not satisfied with your response in the final step—there is a reason people have been debating these issues for a few centuries and counting!
Human nature has been a topic of debate for centuries, with various philosophers presenting different perspectives on the subject. In this essay, I will evaluate the positions presented by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and identify the one that makes the most sense to me.
Thomas Hobbes argues that people are naturally selfish and evil and that without a strong government to restrain humanity's violent impulses, the "state of nature" is a "war of all against all" and life is "nasty, brutish, and short." This position is supported by evidence of war, conflict, and violence throughout history, as well as by the fact that people often act in their own self-interest. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people are inherently bad and that there is no hope for them to improve.
John Locke argues that people are born blank slates, neither good nor bad. For that reason, each generation must take great care what environment they raise the next generation in, because everything they think will be based on what they are taught by people and circumstances. This position is supported by the fact that people's actions and beliefs can be influenced by their environment and by the fact that people are capable of change. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people have no inherent nature and that they are just a product of their environment.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues that people are born naturally good and that civilization corrupts them. If people could just ignore the confusing influence of social conventions and follow their natural instincts, the world would be much better. This position is supported by the fact that people often act in ways that are beneficial to others and by the fact that people are capable of empathy and compassion. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people are inherently good and that there is no need for laws or government to restrain them.
After considering these three positions, I believe that the position presented by John Locke makes the most sense to me. I agree that people are not inherently good or bad, but rather that they are shaped by their environment and experiences. I also believe that people have the ability to change and improve based on their surroundings and that it is important for each generation to take great care in raising the next generation.
One problem with this position is that it suggests that people have no inherent nature and that they are just a product of their environment, which could be seen as excusing people from being ultimately responsible for their actions. However, I believe that people have the ability to make choices and that they are responsible for their actions, despite the influences of their environment.
In conclusion, the debate on human nature is a complex and ongoing one. While each position has its own strengths and weaknesses, I believe that the position presented by John Locke makes the most sense to me as it acknowledges that people are shaped by their environment, but also holds that people have the ability to make choices and take responsibility for their actions.
Thomas Hobbes - Humans are naturally selfish and evil: Hobbes' view of human nature posits that without strong civilizing governance, human behavior would devolve into a chaotic and violent state of nature. Evidence supporting this position can be found in historical conflicts, power struggles, and instances of aggression among individuals and groups.
Personal observations of selfish behavior and acts of violence also contribute to this argument. However, a problem with this perspective lies in the fact that humans are capable of acts of kindness, empathy, and cooperation, which indicates a more nuanced nature.
John Locke - Humans are born blank slates: Locke's theory suggests that individuals are born without innate characteristics and are shaped by their environment and experiences. Evidence in favor of this position can be found in the vast diversity of beliefs, behaviors, and personalities across different cultures and societies. Personal observations of people transforming under various circumstances align with Locke's blank slate concept. Nevertheless, the idea that humans are entirely malleable raises questions about any inherent moral compass and the origins of universal ethical principles.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Humans are born naturally good: Rousseau's perspective contends that humans are inherently good and that society's influence corrupts their inherent virtues. Evidence for this viewpoint lies in instances of compassion, altruism, and benevolence shown by individuals in various situations. Personal observations of acts of kindness and selflessness also reinforce this notion. However, a problem arises in explaining the presence of malevolence and cruelty in human history, suggesting that an entirely positive view of human nature might overlook important aspects of reality.
Step 2: My Perspective on Human Nature Among the three positions, John Locke's view that humans are born as blank slates resonates most with me. While I acknowledge the presence of both selfish and altruistic tendencies in humans, the idea that we are shaped significantly by our experiences, education, and environment seems compelling. Personal observations and experiences have shown that individuals can transform and grow positively or negatively based on their surroundings. The richness of human diversity and the potential for change and personal growth reinforce the notion that we start with a blank slate and become shaped through our experiences.
Step 3: Addressing a Problem with the Chosen Position While I lean towards Locke's view of humans as blank slates, a specific problem with this perspective is the question of ultimate responsibility. Historical figures who stood up to their societies and challenged prevailing norms and injustices serve as examples of human agency and the ability to transcend societal influences. This raises a paradox: if humans are purely products of their environment, how do we explain acts of moral courage and defiance against societal norms? Striking a balance between acknowledging the influence of the environment and accepting individual responsibility remains a complex challenge in understanding human nature.
Conclusion: In exploring the question of human nature, it becomes evident that the topic is multifaceted and open to various interpretations. Each position - Hobbes' pessimistic view, Locke's tabula rasa theory, and Rousseau's optimistic perspective - offers valuable insights into human behavior. While I find the idea of humans as blank slates compelling, it is essential to recognize the complexities of human nature and the ongoing nature of this philosophical debate.
To learn more about environment, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/5511643
#SPJ2
Hello fast!!! I will give 30 points Ik it’s not much but I rlly need the answer for this
Answer:
Explanation:
The numbered pair that best completes the diagram is:
C. (1) The tribes of Israel are enslaved by the Egyptians; (2) Abraham's great-grandsons form the 12 tribes of Israel.
This choice aligns with the events described in the diagram. It accurately represents the sequence of events where the tribes of Israel are initially enslaved by the Egyptians and later form the 12 tribes of Israel through Abraham's great-grandsons.
How did Reagan try to make the government smaller? Check all that apply.
He cut funding for drug programs and federal drug-control agencies.
He eliminated government programs to address money mismanagement.
He decreased spending on nuclear weapons and anti-ballistic missiles.
He proposed cutting funding to certain government agencies and groups.
He reduced government regulations on business.
Answer:
These actions suggest a political agenda that prioritizes reducing the size and role of government in various areas. The cut in funding for drug programs and federal drug-control agencies could be seen as a prioritization of reducing government spending over addressing drug-related issues. The elimination of government programs to address money mismanagement could be seen as an effort to reduce government intervention in the private sector. The decrease in spending on nuclear weapons and anti-ballistic missiles could be seen as a move towards reducing military spending. The proposed cuts to certain government agencies and groups suggest a belief that certain areas of government are not necessary or are redundant. The reduction of government regulations on business could be seen as a prioritization of reducing government interference in the economy, potentially to stimulate economic growth.
impact of price discrimination in bussineses
Answer: potentially lower prices, rewards for choosing less popular services and helps the firm stay profitable and in business.
Explanation:
The first
excerpt makes the claim that "many
states have laws that explicitly
recognize indigenous people's rights
over their resources." How does
the second excerpt suggest that the
first excerpt leaves out details about
globalization threatening indigenous
people's rights? What evidence from
the second excerpt supports your
or answer?
Due to the heightened interstate ties and interdependence brought about by globalization, the political function of the state has altered. States were designed to be sovereign, but as a result of globalization, they frequently cede that right to conventions, contracts, compulsion, and imposition.
The interaction and integration of individuals, groups, businesses, and governments on a global scale is known as globalization, or globalization,(Commonwealth English; see spelling variations).
The term "globalization" first appeared in the early 20th century (replacing the earlier French term "mundialization"), took on its current meaning altered sometime in the second half of the 20th century, and first gained widespread usage in the 1990s to describe the unprecedented global connectivity of the post-Cold War world.
Due to advancements in communications and transportation technologies, its beginnings may be seen in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Learn more about globalization, from :
brainly.com/question/30331929
#SPJ1
Describe three ways in which transportation
and communication systems strengthened the
nation's economy.
Answer:
Transportation helped producers move raw materials by water as well as railway, while people were able to move much faster when cars were introduced. Communication allowed for the spread of information and messages, and allowed for more speedy and organized transportation
Explanation:
can you guys help me
Answer:
a
Explanation:
characterize the "Republican Motherhood" construct.
Answer:
"Republican Motherhood" is an 18th-century term for an attitude toward women's roles present in the emerging United States before, during, and after the American Revolution. It centered on the belief that the patriots' daughters should be raised to uphold the ideals of republicanism, in order to pass on republican values to the next generation. In this way, the "Republican Mother" was considered a custodian of civic virtue responsible for upholding the morality of her husband and children. Although it is an anachronism, the period of Republican Motherhood is hard to categorize in the history of Feminism. On the one hand, it reinforced the idea of a domestic women's sphere separate from the public world of men. On the other hand, it encouraged the education of women and invested their "traditional" sphere with a dignity and importance that had been missing from previous conceptions of Women's work.
Explanation:
1
2
3
4
5
How did the environment in which Kennedy was assassinated contribute to its tragic impact?
OIt happened outside in a public place, where many people had gathered to watch him drive by.
O It took place in an auditorium, where he was campaigning for fellow Democrats.
O It took place outside in the nation's capital, where many people had gathered to hear him spea
OIt happened in a northern state, where he and fellow Democrats were extremely popular.
The environment in which Kennedy was assassinated, as described in Option 1, contributed to its tragic impact. The correct answer is option 1.
The assassination occurred outside in a public place, where many people had gathered to watch him drive by. This setting heightened the shock and devastation felt by the witnesses and the nation as a whole. The assassination taking place in such a public setting meant that not only was Kennedy's life abruptly taken, but it happened in front of numerous individuals who had hoped to catch a glimpse of their beloved president. The sudden violence and loss of life in a location where people had gathered with anticipation and excitement amplified the sense of tragedy and shattered the collective optimism and hope of that moment. The public nature of the event also allowed the news to spread rapidly, impacting the nation on a larger scale and solidifying the assassination's profound and tragic impact on American history.Therefore, the correct answer is option 1.For more questions on environment
https://brainly.com/question/721753
#SPJ8
Is there bias in the Pearl Harbor speech? Where is this bias found?
Thank you!!
Answer:Essentially, Roosevelt's speech and timing extended his executive powers to not only declaring war but also making war, a power that constitutionally belongs to Congress. Yesterday, December 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy — the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.
Explanation:
Mga Pangyayaring Nakatulong sa Pag-usbong ng
Damdaming Maka-Pilipino
Answer:
HI NAGKAMALI KA PO ATA NG PINILI NA CATEGORY KASE AMERICANS PO MGA NANDITOExplanation:
YUN LANG PO THANKSAnswer:
этот есть не Philippines
этот есть Us
1. Based on what you read, discuss the series of events that led to Filipino migration to the United States.
2. Based on what you read in Lee and Bulosan’s text, what hardships and opportunities did Filipinos face once they arrived in the US? Please make sure to cite from both books!
Answer:
what are the health care services available in nepal?