The United States has consular and diplomatic missions all over the world. The Secretary of State is in charge of overseeing and coordinating all aspects of American foreign policy, acting at the President's direction.
What is an illustration of diplomatic behavior?For instance, assist people in listening to all perspectives in an issue and cooperating to develop a workable solution. This not only exhibits your diplomatic skills, but also your capacity to inspire a group of people to collaborate in order to solve an issue.
Why are some individuals so diplomatic?A kind and approachable individual is more likely to establish a strong social network built on mutual respect and trust. It's among the most important qualities for anyone who wishes to serve as a diplomat.
To know more about diplomatic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18491554
#SPJ4
Which resources are most important to north africa?
Answer:
Africa's two most profitable mineral resources are gold and diamonds
Explanation:
sorry for the late answer. best of luck! <33
Which explains the connection between the law of demand and excess demand?
The law states that decreases in price leads to greater quantity demanded and limited supply, which occurs during excess demand.
The law states that increases in price increases leads to greater quantity demanded and limited supply, which occurs during excess demand.
The law states that decreases in price leads to greater supply and equilibrium, which occurs during excess demand.
The law states that increases in price leads to greater supply and equilibrium, which occurs during excess demand.
The law of demand states that "price decreases lead to greater demand and limited supply, which occur during excess demand" explains the relation between the law of "demand and excess demand".
What is demand in plain English?Demand is just a consumer's desire to buy products and services immediately and to pay the price associated with them. Demand can be defined as the quantity of things that consumers are prepared and willing to purchase at various prices within a specific time frame.
How do you teach a young child about demand?The supply of something is its quantity. Demand is the level of desire. Prices decrease when supply exceeds demand. Prices increase when demand exceeds supply.
To know more about Demand visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29703449
#SPJ1
Answer:
The law states that decreases in price leads to greater quantity demanded and limited supply, which occurs during excess demand.
Explanation:
The answer above is correct.
for miranda purposes, "custody" usually means that a person is under arrest or
For Miranda purposes, "custody" generally means that a person is under arrest or otherwise deprived of their freedom of movement in a significant way. This is an important distinction because the Miranda warning only needs to be given to individuals who are in custody and subject to interrogation by law enforcement officials.
In other words, if an individual is not in custody, then the Miranda warning does not need to be given before questioning them.
The concept of custody is crucial because it triggers the Miranda warning, which is a set of rights that individuals have when they are being questioned by law enforcement officials. The Miranda warning informs individuals that they have the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the right to have an attorney present during questioning.
If an individual is not in custody, then law enforcement officials can question them without giving them the Miranda warning. However, if an individual is in custody, then the Miranda warning must be given before any questioning can occur. This is to ensure that individuals understand their rights and are not coerced into making incriminating statements.
In summary, for Miranda purposes, custody generally means that a person is under arrest or otherwise deprived of their freedom of movement in a significant way. This triggers the Miranda warning, which informs individuals of their rights when being questioned by law enforcement officials.
To know more about Arrest visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28507520
#SPJ11
a defamation suit for a famous person is harder to win than a defamation suit for a regular person. true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A defamation suit is the act of attacking one's reputation, although someone could defame someone, it isn't easy to prove for non famous people, as they wouldn't have to worry about being affected Income-wise or in General, although it's an unfair assumption, our criminal justice systems do has it's flaws.
TRUE / FALSE. direct democracy enables voters to directly translate their preferences into government policy. match each form of direct democracy to its correct characteristic(s).
TRUE. Direct democracy enables voters to directly translate their preferences into government policy.
There are two forms of direct democracy: initiative and referendum. Initiative allows voters to propose new laws or changes to existing laws, while referendum allows voters to approve or reject laws that have already been proposed by the government. In both cases, voters have a direct say in the creation and implementation of government policy. However, it is important to note that direct democracy is not always feasible or practical, especially in large-scale societies with complex political systems. In these cases, representative democracy, where voters elect officials to represent their interests, may be a more effective form of government.
To know more about democracy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30466950
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the system designed to protect the right of a government to control its citizens’ behaviors through written law? A. Criminal law B. Specific criminal law C. General criminal law D. Common law
Answer:
criminal law
i am confused
Answer: the government use civil service examinations based on the teachings of Confucianism or just C
Explanation: I also use brainly.com I was just searching it up and I saw nobody was doing the answer so here you go
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
in adventures infinity war Is Gamora Trapped in the Soul Stone?
Answer:
yes cuz it took a sacrifice to get the soul stone
Explanation:
without prejudice means
Answer:
Explanation:
Prejudice means: preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.
So without prejudice means: without any preconceived opinion that is not based.
9. Susan was a patient at Rasmussen Hospital on September 5. John, Susan’s husband, has requested Susan’s inpatient clinical information and signs an authorization. You are the Release of information clerk at Rasmussen Hospital. Will you honor John’s request and provide him with Susan’s clinical information
Within the law, you are permitted to release the record to the husband, hence you should go ahead a give this information to the husband.
See the explanation below
The law behind the release of medical information.According to the HIPAA Privacy Rule at 45 CFR 164.510(b)
"specifically permits covered entities to share information that is directly relevant to the involvement of a spouse".
However, as a professional, you are not supposed to release information of a patient to an unknown person, in such a case the patient must approve of this first before you go ahead to give it out.
Learn more about the HIPAA Privacy Rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/11069745
#SPJ1
if sara is granted summary judgment at the trial court level, what may ellen do next? explain her options.
If Sara is granted summary judgment at the trial court level, Ellen may do the following things: Appeal the decision, Engage in mediation, Try to settle the case or Try to appeal.
1. Appeal the decision: If Ellen disagrees with the judge's decision, she may appeal to a higher court. An appeal requests that a higher court review the case to determine if there were any legal errors. If the appellate court concludes that there was an error in the proceedings, the court may overturn the decision or grant a new trial.
2. Engage in mediation: If the parties agree, mediation is a process where an impartial third party, the mediator, helps the parties to reach a settlement. A mediator may not have the authority to impose a resolution on the parties, but the mediator's role is to facilitate a discussion to resolve the matter at hand.
3. Try to settle the case: At any point, the parties can agree to settle the case outside of court. A settlement is an agreement between the parties to resolve the dispute without the need for a trial, and it is usually achieved through negotiation. A settlement may involve one party making a payment or performing an action in exchange for the other party's dismissal of the case.
4. Try to appeal: Ellen may file an appeal to the higher court if she disagrees with the judge's decision at the trial court level. An appeal requests that a higher court reviews the case to determine if there were any legal errors. If the appellate court concludes that there was an error in the proceedings, the court may overturn the decision or grant a new trial.
To know more about Judgement:
https://brainly.com/question/2890222
#SPJ11
4. Escola, a waitress, was injured when a bottle of soda exploded in her hand while she was putting it into the restaurant's cooler. The bottle came from a shipment that had remained under the counter for thirty-six hours after being delivered by the bottling company. The bottler had subjected the bottle to the method of testing for defects commonly used in the industry, and there is no evidence that Escola or anyone else did anything to damage the bottle between its delivery and the explosion. Escola brought an action against the bottler for damages. Since she is unable to show any specific acts of negligence on its part, she seeks to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she be able to recover on this theory? Explain.
Answer:
possibly
Explanation:
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.
what was belva's motive in acting as she did? should the motive be considered at any stage in the criminal justice process
The need to protect intellectual property is recognized in the u. S. Constitution. True or false?.
Answer: True
"To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."
found that thought it might help you
Which of the following is a good indication that a website information is questionable
A website is an online source which is responsible for the data content it has and some websites are questionable, while some others are verifiable.
Questionable WebsiteWith this in mind, the following are characteristics to know a questionable website:
They post personal opinions They do not use factsThey are biasedThey do not post truthful informationCredible WebsiteThe characteristics of a credible website include:
They post factual information They are either a government owned or scholarly website. They do not use personal opinion over factsRead more about website integrity here:
https://brainly.com/question/3733655
The physiological effects of marijuana greatly differ from those associated with alcohol.
True
Or
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant
so I was wondering how does homeschooling work, do you do your GCSE, social life in secondary school, will you be allowed to go to uni, maximum price in the UK for a 13-year-old, someone please help?
The current federal law that penalizes drug possession and sale is referred to as the:
a) Harrison Act
b) Marihuana Tax Act
c) Drug Control Act (or Controlled Substances Act)
d) Punitive Drug Strike Law
e) The Richard Milhous Nixon Anti-Drug Law
The current federal law that penalizes drug possession and sale is referred to as the Drug Control Act (or Controlled Substances Act)
The Controlled Substances Act establishes five schedules of controlled substances based on their medical use, potential for abuse, and safety. The schedules range from Schedule I, which includes drugs with a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, to Schedule V, which includes drugs with a low potential for abuse and accepted medical use. The act also established penalties for drug possession, trafficking, and manufacturing, and created federal agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to enforce drug laws and regulate controlled substances. The act has been amended several times over the years, but it remains a central component of federal drug policy in the United States.
Learn more about schedules here:
https://brainly.com/question/14448019
#SPJ11
The main goal is two-fold: 1) we will lay out a foundation of how to understand drugs from a few angles to make sure you have a broad understanding of the issue and 2) we need to understand the forces out there that are responsible in shaping drug policy.
Your job this week is to find a recent example of a moral panic and tell us exactly why your example fits the 'moral panic' phenomenon. Is there a moral entrepreneur in your example? Is there a 'folk devil?' Who are they? What parts do they play in perpetuating the panic, leading to bad policy? What was the bad policy that your example resulted in? And so on...
REAL ANSWERS ONLY!!!!
NO LINKS!!!!!!
The phenomenon of “moral panic” is a social phenomenon that has been recognized in many societies. The concept has been introduced to explain the way in which societies are prone to reacting to events, issues, or people.
The moral panic phenomenon can be defined as a reaction to a perceived threat to the morals, values, and ideals of society. Such events are often characterized by a sense of urgency, a call to action, and a sense of impending doom. The phenomenon is usually fueled by the media, which can exacerbate and amplify the perceived threat. The moral panic phenomenon has been used to explain a variety of social issues, including drug use, juvenile delinquency, and political extremism.
In the case of drug use, moral panics often result in the creation of laws and policies that criminalize drug use and lead to the imprisonment of large numbers of people. This approach has been criticized by some experts, who argue that it is ineffective and counterproductive. In recent years, the opioid epidemic has been a major concern in the United States. Opioids are a class of drugs that includes prescription painkillers such as oxycodone, hydrocodone, and fentanyl, as well as illegal drugs like heroin.
The opioid epidemic has been fueled by a variety of factors, including over-prescription of painkillers, the availability of illegal drugs, and the high cost of treatment for addiction. In response to the opioid epidemic, many states have implemented policies aimed at reducing the availability of prescription painkillers. One such policy is the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP), which requires doctors to check a patient's prescription history before prescribing opioids.
The PDMP has been criticized by some experts, who argue that it is ineffective in reducing the number of opioid-related deaths and may lead to unintended consequences, such as patients seeking illegal drugs to treat their pain the opioid epidemic is a recent example of a moral panic. The moral entrepreneur in this case is the media, which has played a role in shaping public perception of the issue. The “folk devil” is the drug user, who is often portrayed as a dangerous criminal. The policy resulting from this moral panic is the PDMP, which has been criticized for its ineffectiveness and potential negative consequences.
For more questions on juveniles
https://brainly.com/question/29398659
#SPJ8
You are approaching an intersection and are preparing to turn right with a green light. You should slow down, signal your turn and
Answer: look both sides before taking the turn
Explanation:
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
the responsibility congress has for following up on laws it has enacted, to ensure that they are being enforced and administered in the way congress intended
The responsibility Congress has for following up on laws it has enacted, to ensure that they are being enforced and administered in the way Congress intended, is known as legislative oversight.
Legislative oversight is a crucial function of Congress that ensures the proper implementation and enforcement of laws passed by the legislative body. It serves as a check and balance on the executive branch, which is responsible for carrying out and administering these laws. Through oversight, Congress ensures that the executive branch faithfully executes legislation and operates within the intended scope defined by Congress.
One of Congress's primary responsibilities is to enact laws that address various policy issues and serve the best interests of the country and its citizens. However, the role of Congress does not end with the passage of legislation. It is equally important for Congress to actively oversee the implementation of these laws to ensure their effective enforcement.
Legislative oversight involves a range of activities carried out by members of Congress and their committees. These activities include conducting hearings, investigations, and inquiries to gather information and assess the execution of laws. Through these mechanisms, Congress can hold hearings to question executive branch officials, invite expert witnesses, and obtain relevant documentation to evaluate the progress and impact of enacted laws.
The purpose of legislative oversight is twofold: first, to ensure that the laws are being enforced according to the intent of Congress, and second, to identify any deficiencies or issues in their implementation. By conducting oversight, Congress can identify potential problems, gaps in enforcement, or instances of executive branch overreach, allowing lawmakers to take corrective actions if necessary.
Congressional committees play a crucial role in overseeing specific policy areas and agencies responsible for implementing the laws. For example, the House Judiciary Committee oversees matters related to the judicial system, while the Senate Foreign Relations Committee focuses on foreign policy and international relations. These committees have the authority to hold hearings, request documents, and question executive branch officials to ensure proper oversight of specific areas of legislation.
Legislative oversight serves as a mechanism for accountability and transparency in the functioning of the government. It helps maintain the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that the laws enacted by Congress are faithfully executed and that any deviations or issues are addressed promptly. Through oversight, Congress can identify potential shortcomings in legislation, propose amendments, or introduce new bills to address emerging challenges or changing circumstances.
In summary, legislative oversight is the responsibility of Congress to follow up on laws it has enacted, ensuring that they are enforced and administered according to the intent of Congress. It involves activities such as hearings, investigations, and inquiries to assess the implementation and impact of laws. Legislative oversight plays a crucial role in maintaining accountability, transparency, and the effective functioning of the government.
Learn more about Congress here
https://brainly.com/question/491441
#SPJ11
True or False? All crashes are accidents.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Which is true about Plato’s Five Regimes of human government?
referendum
court order
repossession
executive order
Answer:
Jesus loves you
Jessica and Emma are full-time employees at the Benjamin Limited Liability Company. They went to a coffee house named New Heaven Café near their office in the lunch time. Jessica ordered one coffee for her and a bottle of beer for her friend. Emma drank about half of the bottle, which was made of dark glass and labelled with white bold words.
When Emma poured the remainder of the beer into a tumbler, she found a stranger. At this point, the decomposed remains of a snail floated out. She was shocked and suffered a severe painful stomach. She had to spend a week in hospital. The doctor confirmed that her stomach problems might have been caused by the inferior quality beer.
The Western Beverages company which manufactured and supplied beer to New Heaven Café confirmed that their manufacturing process was controlled strictly, which had never caused any incidents like that.
Emma’s boss was very angry when she had a week leave in busy days at work. She explained that she had an urgent health problem. However, the boss was insistent with his intention; she was fired on the first day she was back to work. Emma is so upset and needs some legal advice.
Requirements:
Emma has approached you for some legal advice. Write a report outlining the following:
Explain the above legal issues with reference to the English legal system, decided and recorded case law.
The assignment will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:
1. Emma confuses as to whether there is a contract between her and the beer
manufacturer. Explain the essential elements of contract.
2. Advise Emma whether she may successfully sue the Western Beverages company
for negligence. Explain the essential elements to claim for negligence.
3. Advise Emma of her legal position with regards to Benjamin Limited Liability
Company. Explain the different types of dismissal.
Contract refers to an agreement between two or more party to carry out a duty in return for consideration
1. Yes, there is a contract between him and the beer company because he paid a sum for the beer and the company is responsible for producing good and healthy beer.
2. Yes, Emma can sue the company because she has suffered damage from use of the beer. She suffered health-wise and loss her job because of health issue arising from use of the beer.
3. Since the dismissal is done harshly, he can seek for resolution with the management to retain him back.
Read more about Contract element
brainly.com/question/8116487
What do terrorists' threats do to the ways private security and law enforcement officers apply Constitutional laws? (Check all that apply.)
They allow private security to use its own interpretation in some cases
They heighten the need to regulate the practices of these two agencies
They assure that the two agencies know how to work cooperatively in crises situations
They require sharing of key information
Answer:
1.4,2
Explanation:
Which does the Supreme Court NOT currently consider when evaluating issues of entrapment?
Whether police actions provided essential elements to a crime when the Supreme Court NOT currently consider when evaluating issues of entrapment .
What the police can do to convince you they are not cops ?
If you ask a police officer if they are a cop, they may lie to you. Undercover police may and will use a number of strategies to make you believe they are not in fact law enforcement. Most frequently, we witness the application of these strategies during "Mr. Big" operations. A "Mr. Big" operation is a well-known Canadian police strategy that effectively enables the authorities to establish a fictitious criminal gang that finally results in a confession from a suspect using a number of various techniques.
Since there has already been a lot published about "Mr. Big" activities in Canada, this blog won't go into great length about them. As I indicated, these frequently happen during Mr. Big operations, but not always. Instead, I want to concentrate on particular police strategies undercover agents will employ to make people think they are not the police.
To learn more about Undercover police checkout the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/13761769
#SPJ9
How would a customer preference for women attendants in the women’s restroom or locker room be judged under employment discrimination?.
A customer preference for women attendants in women's restrooms or locker rooms can potentially raise concerns related to employment discrimination, particularly if it results in discriminatory hiring practices based on gender.
To judge such a preference, it would be necessary to consider the legal framework surrounding employment discrimination and the principles of equal opportunity.
In many jurisdictions, employment discrimination laws prohibit unfair treatment based on protected characteristics, including gender. These laws aim to ensure that all individuals have equal access to employment opportunities and are treated fairly in the workplace.
Therefore, if a customer preference for women attendants results in discriminatory practices that exclude qualified individuals solely based on their gender, it could be seen as a violation of these laws.
Employment discrimination claims are typically evaluated by examining whether the employer's practices create an adverse impact on a protected group.
If a customer preference for women attendants leads to systematic exclusion or disadvantages for male applicants or other individuals who do not identify as female, it could be deemed discriminatory.
Know more about employment here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ11
If I were to add alcohol to the education system what problems would I CREATE? Meaning what problems would I create if I taught kids about alcohol in school as a module?
A lot of people don't understand this question.
Answer:
reducing the number of hours committed to studying
Explanation:
hope it helps
\( \: \: \: \: \)
you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science
Alcohol use could also affect performance by reducing the number of hours committed to studying, completing homework assignments, and attending school. ... Both studies found that drinking had a direct negative effect on GPA and an indirect negative effect through reduced study hours.hope it helps\( \: \: \: \: \: \)
Which of the following are required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? (Select all that apply.) art 2 of 3 21 Check All That Apply Skipped Auditors of public companies are allowed to perform nonaudit services for audit clients as long as the audit committee of the company being audited has preapproved those services. Book Print Auditors of public companies must retain all audit or review work papers for seven years or face the threat of a prison term for willful violations Corporate executives who personally certify financial statements that are fraudulently misstated may be fined and/or imprisoned. Lead audit partners are required to rotate every seven years.
Answer:
1. Book Prink Auditors of public companies must retain all audit or review work papers for seven years or face the threat of a prison term for willful violations.
2. Corporate executives who personally certify financial statements that are fraudulently misstated may be fined and/or imprisoned.
3. Lead audit partners are required to rotate every seven years.
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
SOX has several requirements to improve corporate governance and financial reporting.
Retention of audit work papers, auditors of public companies must keep their audit or review work papers for seven years to ensure transparency and accountability.
Accountability of corporate executives, executives who certify fraudulent financial statements risk fines and imprisonment, highlighting the need of correct reporting.
Lead audit partners are rotated, to guarantee independence and objectivity, the primary auditors who oversee corporate audits must change every seven years.