Whichbest describes the reason why we know so little about most native american tribes?
Answers
The reason why we know so little about most Native American tribes can be best described by factors such as: colonization, cultural erasure, lack of written records, and biased historical accounts.
During colonization, many Native American tribes faced significant disruptions to their way of life. European settlers often forced them to assimilate into European customs and religions, resulting in the loss of their traditional cultural practices.
This process of cultural erasure made it difficult to preserve and understand the unique aspects of each tribe.
Furthermore, many Native American tribes did not have a written language or a system for recording their history, so much of their knowledge was passed down orally from generation to generation.
This oral tradition makes it challenging for modern researchers to piece together accurate historical accounts, as some information might have been lost or altered over time.
Additionally, the historical accounts that do exist were often written by European colonizers, who had their own biases and preconceptions about Native Americans. These accounts can be unreliable and may not provide a comprehensive understanding of Native American tribes.
In summary, the limited knowledge we have about most Native American tribes can be attributed to factors such as colonization, cultural erasure, lack of written records, and biased historical accounts. These factors have made it difficult to preserve and study the rich cultural heritage of these diverse tribes.
To know more about colonization, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/8933081#
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Elizabeth i of england is presented as an example of a ruler who succeeded by?
Answers
Elizabeth I of England is presented as an example of a ruler who succeeded by James VI Scotland. The following of the childless From the time of her coronation in 1558 until her death in 1603, when James VI of Scotland assumed the throne, Elizabeth I's legitimacy was in doubt. While James' accession happened without a hitch, the succession was hotly contested for many years.
Separate components, such as the "Norfolk conspiracy" and Patrick Collinson's "Elizabethan exclusion issue," have their own names. Elizabeth I resisted establishing the succession plan in any way, perhaps out of concern for her own safety once a successor was chosen. If not explicitly stated, it also, in some academic opinions, played a significant political role throughout the entire reign.
To learn more about Elizabeth I, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/7953850
#SPJ4
t/f the majority of the western european agriculture takes place on the great european plain
Answers
The given statement "the majority of the Western European agriculture takes place on the Great European plain" is false the majority of Western European agriculture does not take place on the Great European Plain.
While the Great European Plain, which stretches across several countries including France, Germany, Poland, and Ukraine, is indeed an important agricultural region, it is not the sole or primary location for Western European agriculture.
Western European agriculture is diverse and distributed across various regions and landscapes. Countries like France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, and the United Kingdom have significant agricultural activity in various areas, including plains, coastal regions, uplands, and river valleys.
Learn more about western european:
https://brainly.com/question/29472458
#SPJ4
Your community might have some social problems and evils. Make a list of them along with its cause and solutions. IT NOT HISTORY BUT IT INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIETY (I.S)
Answers
Answer:
Some problems faced by society that affect the lives of individuals can be the lack of access to information, the lack of work and the lack of essential rights such as food and security.
When there are problems in a community related to social inequality, it is common for other problems to arise that marginalize individuals, such as increased drug use, increased crime, etc.
To change this situation in a community, the entire population must be made aware of the importance of choosing their political representatives, as it is necessary to create public policies that include investments in education, in support of entrepreneurs, in creating new jobs , etc.
ap euro the linguistic diversity represented on the map contributed most directly to which of the following developments regarding french foreign policy in the nineteenth century?
Answers
The linguistic diversity represented on the map contributed most directly to the following developments regarding French foreign policy in the 19th century.
France was characterized by a strong sense of national identity and centralized government. The various groups living in the region spoke different languages and had different cultural practices.
What is Linguistic Diversity?Linguistic diversity refers to the variety of languages spoken by people in a specific geographical region. It implies the existence of a range of dialects within a language, as well as the presence of numerous languages in a given region.
Linguistic diversity is the foundation of multilingualism and is a crucial component of social and cultural diversity in the world. In the nineteenth century, the situation in France was such that the country was divided into different regions with distinct cultures and languages.
Brittany, for example, spoke Breton, which was very distinct from French, while Alsace-Lorraine spoke a Germanic dialect that was very different from French, which was the official language of the nation. This linguistic diversity posed a challenge to the French government, which was intent on strengthening national unity and promoting centralization.
The government was aware that linguistic diversity might potentially lead to regionalism and separatism. As a result, they attempted to restrict the use of non-French languages, particularly in public life and education. The linguistic diversity in France was a major factor in the country's foreign policy decisions.
In the 19th century, France pursued a policy of territorial expansion to offset its economic and political weaknesses. French policymakers sought to create an empire that would rival that of Britain. As a result, France expanded its territorial holdings in Africa and Asia, in order to gain new markets for its goods and sources of raw materials.
The linguistic diversity of the people living in these regions presented a challenge to French policymakers, as they had to decide whether to assimilate these populations into French culture or respect their linguistic and cultural diversity.
Ultimately, French policymakers chose to adopt an assimilationist policy, arguing that the French language and culture were superior to those of the colonized peoples.
To know more about linguistic diversity, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/14860934#
#SPJ11
Which of these were outcomes of the Council of Trent?
Select all that apply.
transubstantiation was removed from doctrinetransubstantiation was removed from doctrine
predestination was supported over free willpredestination was supported over free will
the Vulgate Bible became the only legitimate biblical sourcethe Vulgate Bible became the only legitimate biblical source
indulgences were to no longer be sold
Answers
Answer:
option b
Explanation:
my name is trent
Can someone help me with this question?
Answers
the second one
,like cabot made....
why did The Origins Of Some Beloved Halloween Tradition article important?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
It started as a Celtic end-of-summer event when people felt particularly connected to their departed loved ones. They burned lights to aid loved ones in returning to the spirit realm, put gifts on doorsteps and by the side of the road, and set places at the dinner table for these amiable spirits.
history wants me to describe each president scandal
Answers
The presidential scandals in the US which involved Presidents Grant, Harding, Nixon, Reagan and Clinton, had negative impacts on their legacies and led to scrutiny of their administrations.
The presidential scandalsGrant: The Whiskey Ring Scandal (1875)
What happened: During President Ulysses S. Grant's administration, a group of government officials and whiskey distillers conspired to defraud the federal government of excise tax revenues from whiskey sales.Details of the scandal: The scandal involved a network of corrupt officials, including Grant's personal secretary, Orville E. Babcock.Impact: The scandal tarnished President Grant's reputation as his personal secretary was implicated in the scheme. It led to several arrests and trials, including that of Babcock, but Grant's presidency and the government as a whole survived the scandal.Harding: Teapot Dome Scandal (1921-1923)
What happened: President Warren G. Harding's administration was involved in a bribery scandal related to the leasing of federal oil reserves at Teapot Dome, Wyoming, and Elk Hills, California.Details of the scandal: Secretary of the Interior Albert B. Fall secretly leased the oil reserves to private oil companies without competitive bidding and accepted bribes in return.Impact: The Teapot Dome Scandal was one of the most significant examples of government corruption in American history. The scandal highlighted the need for increased transparency and accountability in government operations.Nixon: Watergate Scandal (1972-1974)
What happened: The Watergate Scandal involved a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate complex during President Richard Nixon's re-election campaign.Details of the scandal: The break in was orchestrated by members of Nixon's re-election committee, and it was later revealed that Nixon's administration had attempted to cover up their involvement. Impact: The Watergate Scandal led to President Nixon's resignation in 1974, making him the only U.S. president to step down from office. The scandal eroded public trust in the government and the presidency, resulting in significant political and institutional repercussions.Reagan: Iran-Contra Affair (1985-1987)
What happened: The Iran-Contra Affair involved the Reagan administration's covert operations to sell arms to Iran and use the proceeds to fund anti-Sandinista rebels in Nicaragua, despite a congressional ban on such assistance.Details of the scandal: The Reagan administration sought to secure the release of American hostages held in Lebanon by selling arms to Iran, which was engaged in a war with Iraq. The proceeds from the arms sales were then diverted to support the Contras, who were fighting against the Sandinista government in Nicaragua.Impact: Several high-ranking officials were indicted and convicted, although President Reagan himself was not directly implicated. The scandal prompted investigations and congressional hearings, leading to increased oversight of executive branch activities.Clinton: Monica Lewinsky Scandal (1998)
What happened: President Bill Clinton was involved in a scandal related to his extramarital affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.Details of the scandal: The affair between President Clinton and Monica Lewinsky began in 1995 when she was a 22-year-old intern. The relationship continued until 1997. Clinton denied having sexual relations with Lewinsky. However, evidence, including Lewinsky's testimony and physical evidence, contradicted his statements.Impact: The Monica Lewinsky Scandal had a significant impact on the country, President Clinton, and the government. It led to Clinton's impeachment by the House of Representatives on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. The scandal contributed to increased scrutiny of personal conduct and morality in politics.Learn more on presidential scandals in US here https://brainly.com/question/1224043
#SPJ1
How do the states affirm in this declaration that they are making the correct decision in declaring independence?.
Answers
The colonies are no longer loyal to Britain's tyrannical rule.
What structure does the Declaration of Independence have?
There are five separate portions in the Declaration of Independence: an introduction, a preamble, a body with two divisions, and a conclusion. According to the introduction, this document would "declare" the "causes" that have necessitated the American colonies' separation from the British Empire.What is the Independence Declaration and why is it significant?
One of the most significant texts in American history is the Declaration of Independence. The declaration of independence from British rule by the 13 American colonies was a formal action.Learn more about Britain's tyrannical rule
brainly.com/question/8432500
#SPJ4
patriots were the majority of the interior why do you think that was the case
Answers
Answer:
Because they were better than them
Explanation:
Independent studies were done to determine how important it is to United States (U.S.) adults for the U.S. to be a global leader in research to improve health. In 2007, 825 people were randomly selected to participate. The survey found that 76% of the people surveyed believed that it is very important for the U.S. to be a global leader in research to improve health. In 2010, 1000 people were randomly selected to participate in an independent study. The results indicated that 69% of the people in the study believed that it is very important for the U.S. to be a global leader in research to improve health. The z-statistic for the difference between the two sample proportions is 3.38, with a P-value of 0.007. If the level of significance is set at 0.05, what conclusions can you draw about the difference between the two population proportions
Answers
The difference between the two population proportions is statistically significant.
Explanation:
To determine if the difference between the two population proportions is statistically significant, we first need to set our level of significance or alpha value. In this case, it is set at 0.05.
Next, we calculate the z-statistic, which measures the difference between the two sample proportions in terms of standard errors. In this case, the z-statistic is 3.38, which is greater than the critical z-value of 1.96 at the 0.05 level of significance.
The P-value of 0.007 indicates that there is less than a 1% chance of observing a difference as extreme as the one observed in the sample data, assuming that the null hypothesis (that there is no difference between the two population proportions) is true.
Since the P-value is less than the level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the difference between the two population proportions is statistically significant. Therefore, we can infer that there has been a significant decrease in the proportion of U.S. adults who believe it is very important for the U.S. to be a global leader in research to improve health between 2007 and 2010.
Know more about the statistically significant click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32303375
#SPJ11
who repaid latin american debts owed to europe
Answers
Answer:
The Latin American debt crisis was a financial crisis that originated in the early 1980s (and for some countries starting in the 1970s), often known as La Década Perdida (The Lost Decade), when Latin American countries reached a point where their foreign debt exceeded their earning power, and they were not able to repay it.
The Latin American debt crisis, also known as La Década Perdida (The Lost Decade), was a financial crisis that began in the early 1980s (and for some countries, in the 1970s),
What is debt?Debt can be defined simply as the amount owed by the borrower to the lender. A debt is a quantity of money borrowed for a set period of time and must be repaid together with interest. The amount as well as the approval of the debt are determined by the borrower's creditworthiness.
when Latin American countries reached a point where their foreign debt exceeded their earning capacity and they were unable to repay it.
A third of the total amount of outstanding debt, or $61 billion, was forgiven by private lenders between 1989 and 1994. The Brady plan's 18 signatory nations made domestic economic reforms in return, which would have allowed them to pay off their outstanding debt.
Therefore, debt crisis, also known as La Década Perdida
Learn more about debt here:
https://brainly.com/question/17286021
#SPJ12
how did european countries prevent haitis success in the years after independence
Answers
Since gaining its independence from France, a variety of factors have threatened Haiti's development, including foreign meddling, domestic political corruption, natural disasters, and epidemics.
After gaining independence from France in 1804, foreign powers continued to interfere in Haiti. Only after its former colony agreed to make reparations that would be worth $22 billion today did France finally recognize Haiti as an independent nation in 1825. Up to 80% of Haiti's income over the ensuing 120 years was used to pay off this debt.
Only in 1862, when President Abraham Lincoln was promoting emancipation both at home and abroad, did the United States officially recognize Haiti. Later U.S. administrations mainly had a strategic perspective on Haiti.
The Caribbean region as a whole experiences fewer natural disasters than Haiti, which is situated on a geological fault line in a region vulnerable to powerful storms. Due to extensive deforestation, the nation is now particularly vulnerable to flooding and mudslides.
To learn more about the Revolution of Haiti, refer to the answer below:
https://brainly.com/question/1333720
#SPJ1
What was Henry II’s contribution to English law?
He began to dismantle the feudal system that had governed England.
He introduced Christianity to the island.
He reformed the monarchy to require parliamentary approval for taxes.
He imposed a system of common laws where previously local lords had ruled personally.
Answers
He changed the monarchy so that parliamentary consent was required for taxation. He established a system of common laws to replace the lords' personal rule. His contribution to English law is the revision of Henry II's monarchy to demand parliamentary approval for taxing.
What does monarchy mean?The monarch, a single ruler who acts as the head of state, is given absolute authority in a monarchical political system.
In a constitutional monarchy, the head of state is a monarch. The British monarchy, a constitutional monarchy, is well-known. So, even if the sovereign is the head of state, only an elected parliament has the power to draught and pass legislation. One person, known as the monarch, is the head of state in a monarchy for all time or until abdication. The monarch's political legitimacy and influence on the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government can be modest and largely symbolic or totally autocratic.
To know more about monarchy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3458331
#SPJ1
Como crees que fue la participación de México en la primera y segunda guerra mundial?
Answers
Mexico became an active belligerent in World War II in 1942 after Germany sank two of its tankers. The Mexican foreign secretary, Ezequiel Padilla, took the lead in urging other Latin American countries to support the Allies as well. A small Mexican air unit operated with the United States in the Philippines.
Select the correct locations on the map. Identify the two Native American nations that had extensive coal deposits.
Answers
Answer:
Choctaw & Chickasaw.
Explanation:
It is stipulated in 1803 that while individuals may continue to own the mines that they founded on Native territories, they had to pay a royalty to tribes that own the land as a royalty as well as 1 cent per ton. The mines were found on Choctaw and Chickasaw lands.
Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
In addition to catching fish in the waters near New France during the 1500s, French fishermen
searched for a route to Asia.
began to trade with American Indians.
established colonies named for their king.
challenged the English for control of North America.
Answers
In addition to catching fish in the waters near New France in the 15th century, French fishermen noted that ``2. Many settlers lacked the necessary techniques for harvesting,
Indians were unable to provide them with food grown from the ground. So we trade with American Indians." In fact, the first visitors to New French fishermen were fishermen. They came to catch fish off Newfoundland and brought it back to Europe to sell. Fishing was not profitable for the colonies as the fish was sold in Europe and fishermen did not settle in New France. At the turn of the 17th century, European fishermen worked off the coast of Newfoundland and Labrador for about 100 years. Most come in May or June to take advantage of the abundant cod stock and return overseas in late summer or early fall.
To know more about Newfoundland visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14174518
#SPJ1
Congress passed an act which called for the drafting of military-age men. This resulted in an army made up mostly of conscripted soldiers rather than volunteers.
A.) Selective Service Act
B.) Boots and Bullets Act
C.) The Draft Act
Answers
Answer:
C. The Draft Act
Explanation:
2+2
its for u guys to get more points
Answers
Answer:
The answer is 4
Thank you for the opportunity
Two is 1+1
Which equals 2
Then you add another two which is another 1+1
Which is 1+1+1+1
It equals 4
A method of treating mental disorders *
O realism
O surrealism
O abstract
O psychoanalysis
Answers
Realism
I’m
PLS helppp
Who was primarily responsible for the start of the
Cold War? What evidence do you have to support
your claim? (Minimum of 3 sentences, 3pts)
Answers
Answer:
The start of the Cold War was primarily due to the actions and policies of the United States and the Soviet Union. Both nations had conflicting ideologies and interests, and tensions between the two began to rise during the post-World War II period. The Soviet Union's expansionist policies and aggressive actions in Eastern Europe certainly contributed to the start of the Cold War. Similarly, the United States' policies of containment and the Truman Doctrine also escalated tensions between the two nations. Ultimately, both nations initiated the Cold War as it was a complex and multifaceted conflict with numerous contributing factors.
Explanation:
in which african country did henry morton stanley work as an agent for king leopold of belgium?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Henry Morton Stanley had help lobby officials to support Leopold's actions in Congo. This led to U.S. recognition of Leopold's hold on Congo in 1884.
Which state ratified the constitution after congress agreed to amend the constitution to include the bill of rights?
Answers
Answer:
Bill of Rights is finally ratified Following ratification by the state of Virginia, the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, known collectively as the Bill of Rights, become the law of the land.
Explanation:
Answer: New York
Explanation:
Edmentum
5. Explain the emergence of the consumer society, and discuss the factors that determined the extent to which working-class Americans were able to
participate in this society.
Answers
What is the relationship between how Jews were portrayed to the public and their persecution during the Holocaust?
Answers
Answer:
Between 1941 and 1945, around 6 million European Jews were murdered during the holocaust which was the genocide during World War II and this is in consanguinity with the form of deflecting the acts of criticism from the actions of the Nazi Leadership in Germany, by swindling the German community and deluding international public portraying a sense of foreign aggression from the Jews.
Nazi propagandists tracked the German’s larger population they viewed the resident Jewish people with repugnance and antipathy. On September 1, 1939, the Nazis unleashed war and invaded Poland and therefore, the Nazi anti-Jewish woke into a genocide.
Explanation:
Approximately 6 million European Jews were killed between 1941 and 1945 during the Holocaust, which was a genocide committed during World War II.
What is the concept of the excerpt?This was done in order to divert attention away from the actions of the Nazi Leadership in Germany by tricking the German community and misleading the international community by portraying a sense of Jewish aggression from abroad.
Nazi propagandists observed the greater population of Germany; they had an animosity and disgust for the local Jews. The Nazis started a war and invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, which sparked a genocide against Jews.
Yet, World War Two in Europe brought about the most significant upheavals for the German Jewish population. Leo Baeck, a well-known Jewish theologian.
Thus, Approximately 6 million European Jews were killed between 1941 and 1945 during the Holocaust,
For more information about concept of the excerpt, click here
https://brainly.com/question/23481383
#SPJ2
Write a brief, one- or two-sentence summary of this statement by U.S. president Ronald Reagan.
Answers
President Reagan wants to draw the attention of the people by mentioning the subordination of Cuba under Soviet influence.
Who was Ronald Reagan?Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) was an American politician who served as President of the United States from 1981 to 1989. During his second term in office, he focused primarily on foreign affairs related to the end of the Cold War.
What message does Ronald Reagan convey in his speech excerpt?In the fragment of President Ronald Reagan's speech, the subject of his rival relationship with the Soviet Union and the influence he had had in Cuba after the Cuban Revolution in the 1950s can be highlighted.
In this excerpt Reagan focuses on informing citizens and public opinion that the influence of the Soviet Union in Cuba is a problem for their interests because it can lead to a clash of interests between the two nations that triggers serious consequences in the context of the cold war.
Note: This question is incomplete because there is some information missing. Here is the complete information:
Fragment
Our diplomatic objectives will not be achieved by good will and noble aspirations alone. In the last 15 years the growth of Soviet military power has meant a radical change in the nature of the world in which we live. This does not mean, as some would have us believe, that we are in imminent danger of nuclear war. Such is not the case.
As long as we maintain the strategic balance and make it more stable by reducing the level of armament on both sides, we can count on the basic prudence of the Soviet leadership in avoiding that kind of challenge to us. Currently they are challenging us with a new kind of weapon: subversion and the use of subordinate forces from other countries, the Cubans for example.
Learn more about Ronald Reagan in: https://brainly.com/question/2352947
#SPJ1
What impact did washing machines have
Answers
Answer:
woman get more lazyyyyyyyyyyy
How does Senator Beveridge describe the LAND of the United States??
Answers
this Iceland ampere is the last land left in all the ocean if it should prove a mistake to abandon it the Blunder once made would be .
Answer:
What territory does Beveridge state belongs to the US?
✔ the Philippines
What geographic area is the underlined text describing?
✔ China and East Asia
In the text, Beveridge states that future wars will be fought over
✔ trade
McDonald v. Chicago issue
U.S. v. Nixon issue
Marbury vs. Madison decision
McDonald v. Chicago decision
U.S. v. Nixon decision