Based on historical perspective, the statement that best expresses why the southern states decided to secede from the union after the election of 1860 is that "they feared their economy would be destroyed without slave labor."
1860 Presidential ElectionFollowing the presidential election of 1860 in which Abraham Lincoln, a Northern Politician, and Republican, won the majority, the southerners believed there would be abolition of slavery throughout the country, affecting their economy.
The economy of the South was based on agricultural plantations in which slaves were the means of managing the farmland.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "they feared their economy would be destroyed without slave labor."
Learn more about the Southern United States here: https://brainly.com/question/640349
A gas at constant pressure occupies 900 ml at 30°C. What would the volume be
at 45°C?
Answer:
1350 mL
Explanation:
Given that,
Volume, V₁ = 900 mL
Temperature, T₁ = 30°C
We need to find the new volume if the temperature is 45°C. The relation between temperature and volume is direct (Charles's law).
\(\dfrac{V_1}{V_2}=\dfrac{T_1}{T_2}\\\\V_2=\dfrac{V_1T_2}{T_1}\\\\V_2=\dfrac{900\times 45}{30}\\\\V_2=1350\ \text{mL}\)
So, the new volume is 1350 mL.
How long do it takes for you to get a house
Answer:
it depends how much money you have. but if you have the money then probably a month or 5 weeks,
You are eligible to get your Class E restricted license when you
are at least 16 years old and have had your Learner License for
at least. ___months.
9
2
6
12
Answer:
6 months
hey!
To apply for a provisional driver's license, a driver must be at least 16 and under 18 years old. The person must have held a learner's permit for at least six months prior to applying for a provisional driver's license.
The driver also must have at least 100 hours of driving experience supervised by a person at least 21 years of age who has had a valid driver's license for at least three years. Alternatively, the driver can complete a traffic safety education course and at least 50 hours of supervised driving experience.
hope that helps! :)
Answer:
The correct answer is 6 months.
Explanation:
MARK ME AS BRIANLIST
please mention at least 20 fundamental human rights in the constitution
Answer:
The fundamental human rights contained in the constitution of Nigeria are: the Right to Life, the Right to Dignity of Human Person, the Right to Personal Liberty, the Right to Fair Hearing, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, the Right to Freedom of Expression.
A recent survey of stage legislators received that only about 5% of state senators and representatives actually asked the citizens in their district for opinions on upcoming bills and proposals as a future voter make a list of five ways you could get involved in your state senators representatives and make decisions about potential laws in your state
The ways that you can get involved in the state representatives are:
By voting for the people that you think are best capable for the position.By writing to the lawmakers based on what you perceive to be the need of the society.By visiting the office of the lawmakersBy sharing their concerns about proposed bills.By participating in Town hall meetings.What are the ways that senators can carry the people along?Citizens participate in democracy through casting ballots. The interests of the people are supported by the leaders who are chosen by the people to represent them and their beliefs. Voting in federal elections and running for federal office are two unique privileges available solely to residents of the United States.
Read more on senators here;https://brainly.com/question/747425
#SPJ1
What is the first form of limited government seen in 1215? I'll give BRAINLIEST ANSWER
Answer: The Magna Carta, drafted in the year 1215, is one of the earliest pieces of evidence of a limited government.
Explanation: The document limited the reach of the English king's power by giving the country's nobility rights that they could exercise over the throne. Hope this helped! :)
The expression (2a)3 is?
Answer:
the answer will be 6a
Explanation:
I just know
How does Henry's statement reflect the idea of social contract? How does the idea of social contract protect people's natural and individual rights?
the statement: "The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."
—Patrick Henry
Answer:
Basically, what the statement is saying is that the constituents of a government are it's most valuable resource, and nothing is more important than that resource. The social contract is the implicit agreement between the government and the people saying that if the people follow laws and work together for societal benefits, it is the responsibility of the government to protect them. This Reflects the idea of the social contract because the government's most valuable resource is its people, and under the social contract, if they follow laws, it is the government's responsibility to protect them and their rights. As for how the social contract protects people's rights, if the constituents follow laws and contribute towards the development of society, it is the governments responsibility to protect their rights.
Since I Was Born In May 31 2005
Am i supposed to be listen to people older than you who was born in June 1st 2003 to December 31st 2004
And Your Age January 1st 2005 to December 30th 2005 during 2005 the same year you were born?
Based on that information, individuals who were born between June 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004, would be older than you.
Whether or not you should listen to people older than you or those around the same age as you is subjective and depends on various factors such as their knowledge, experiences, and the context of the situation. Age alone does not necessarily determine who you should or shouldn't listen to. It's important to consider a person's expertise, wisdom, and the value of their advice or opinions rather than solely focusing on their age.
Therefore, individuals born between January 1, 2005, and December 30, 2005, would be the same age as you during the year 2005.
For more details regarding older people, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8023834
#SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT a criticism of labeling theory?
It ignores structural factors that create or reinforce deviance and crime is NOT a criticism of labeling theory. The complete question is c.
One of the main criticisms of labeling theory is that it frequently ignores the structural causes of crime and deviance. Labeling theory is not without its detractors. The underlying societal factors that contribute to deviance may not be sufficiently addressed by labeling theory which focuses on the social process of labeling people as deviant and how this labeling can contribute to further deviant behavior.
Higher rates of crime and deviance can be attributed to structural factors like poverty, inequality and a lack of opportunities. Critics contend that labeling theory overemphasizes individual-level processes and inadequately takes into account the larger social and economic forces that influence deviant behavior. To develop a thorough understanding of deviance and crime, it is crucial to take into account how structural and labeling factors interact.
learn more about labeling theory here
brainly.com/question/31329812
#SPJ2
The complete question is- Which of the following is a criticism of labeling theory? Select one:
a. It doesn't explain impulsive crimes triggered by rage or fear.
b. It doesn't explain why people are deviant before labeling occurs.
c. It ignores structural factors that create or reinforce deviance and crime. d. It doesn't explain why crime rates have declined since 2000 despite poverty.
e. It doesn't explain how labeling increases deviant behavior.
Fruit Tree Negligence. Mr. Mattingly, a farmer, has a legal right to apply pesticides to his fruit trees. One year, he decided to hire a crop-dusting airplane to spread a pesticide on his orchard. An unexpected gust of wind blew the chemical onto a neighbor's beehives, killing all the bees, The neighbor sued Mattingly for the value of the 60 beehives. Mattingly argued that a good fruit farmer has to apply pesticides and that the crop duster had exercised extreme caution in applying the chemical.
1. Was Mr. Mattingly negligent? Should strict liability apply to this case?
2. How should Mr. Mattingly defend this case? Explain.
3. How would you decide this case? Explain your answer.
Yes, Mr. Mattingly was negligent. Although he had a legal right to apply pesticides to his fruit trees, he also had a duty to do so in a manner that did not cause harm to his neighbors.
Mr. Mattingly could defend this case by arguing that he acted with reasonable care in hiring a crop-dusting airplane to apply the pesticide and that the unexpected gust of wind was an unforeseeable event that he could not have prevented.
In deciding this case, the court would need to consider whether Mr. Mattingly breached his duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to his neighbor's property.
What is Negligence?Negligence is a legal concept that refers to the failure of an individual or entity to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person or property. To establish negligence, a plaintiff must prove four elements:
Duty: The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff;Breach: The defendant breached that duty of care by failing to act with reasonable care or skill;Causation: The defendant's breach of duty caused harm or injury to the plaintiff; andDamages: The plaintiff suffered actual damages as a result of the harm or injury.In other words, negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others, and that failure results in harm or injury. Negligence is a common legal concept in many areas of law, including personal injury, medical malpractice, and product liability.
Learn more about negligence here: https://brainly.com/question/30867929
#SPJ1
Some ways roads can improve
Answer:
Less bumps on the road and a formulated diversion of traffic
Explanation:
This will allow people to safely drive on roads
Answer:
Less potholes, wider lanes , less people speeding and causing accidents , and smooth it out like all that gravle and loos asfalt flying up and hitting other car and just it’s hardon your tires
Explanation:
when I go into questions that I answered I'm the only one reported?
Answer:
?
Explanation:
what do you mean?
The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed in 1990. The law makes it illegal for a business to fire an employee with a disability simply because of this disability. What was the likely intention of this law?
to discourage immoral behavior
to protect the rights of individuals
to increase pay for some groups of people
to provide direct benefits to some groups of people
Answer:
to protect the rights of individuals
Explanation:
plz help hurry
In what ways is the US Constitution influenced by the political ideologies of republicanism, democracy, and federalism? (HINT: In your answer, define republicanism, democracy, and federalism. Then, discuss how the Constitution embraces the ideals expressed in republicanism, democracy, and federalism).
How was Benjamin Franklin influenced by John Locke? In your answer, be sure to use the terms natural rights and individual rights.
Discuss one way English Common Law has influenced our modern democratic institutions and procedures.
The Constitution gives each branch of government different powers through checks and balances and separation of powers. Define both checks and balances and separation of powers, and explain why you think it is important for our government to have both of these.
Why should Mr. Romeri be responsible for Ms. Conley’s emotional happiness? Why did the judge rule his actions unethical? What principles was Ms. Conley basing her belief that Mr. Romeri held liability for his treatment of her? (HINT: Look at the five Decision Making approaches for help.)
Answer:
question is so long firstable make it small ask turn by turn bro its so long i think it make many times
list 5 types of constitution
list 3 sources of constitution
Types of Constitutions:
Written Constitution: A constitution that is codified and exists in a single written document, such as the United States Constitution.
Unwritten Constitution: A constitution that is not codified into a single written document but is based on a combination of statutes, judicial decisions, conventions, and customs, such as the constitution of the United Kingdom.
Flexible Constitution: A constitution that can be easily amended or changed through legislative processes, without strict procedural requirements.
Rigid Constitution: A constitution that has strict procedures and requirements for amendment, making it difficult to change.
Unitary Constitution: A constitution that establishes a centralized system of government where power is concentrated at the national level, with limited or no autonomy for regional or local governments.
Sources of Constitution:
Written Sources: These include written documents, such as constitutions, charters, statutes, and legislative enactments that explicitly define the fundamental principles, structures, and powers of the government.
Precedents and Case Law: Judicial decisions and legal precedents established by courts play a significant role in shaping and interpreting constitutional law.
Historical and Social Context: Constitutions are often influenced by historical events, social, cultural, and political contexts, as well as the ideals and values of the society in which they are formed. These factors contribute to the drafting and interpretation of constitutional provisions.
1. Why do humans put off car maintenance?
O It's inconvenient
O It's expensive
O Our brains think it's a low priority
Answer:
it is expensive
Explanation:
it is expensive
Should parents be allowed to spank their children if necessary?
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Which of the following is something an officer should do when talking to a violator?
A. Allow their gun side to be exposed to the driver
B. Ignore the other occupants of the vehicle
C. Stand in an advantageous position
D. Keep one hand on the Taser at all times
Answer:
C
Explanation:
A and D would seem as a threat to the people inside the car and B is unsafe for the officer.
C allows the officer to act fast, swiftly, and more easily if there is a situation where the driver or passengers assault him/her or try to escape.
An officer should stand in an advantageous position when talking to a violator.
When there is a person who violates traffic laws, it's important for the officer to stand in an advantageous position so that the driver won't runaway or hurt him.In this case, it's important for the officer not to expose his gun. Exposing his gun can lead to the violator hurting him. Also, it's important for the officer to keep an eye on the other occupants of the vehicle.In conclusion, the correct option is C
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/24456517
write a couple of paragraph about an interesting dream that you have had
Answer:
I was so excited! but then I woke up and knew it was just a dream! it was the most interesting dream I've ever had because it's like doing something bad and getting a prize for it. This moment probably ensured a few seconds as it flashed through the neutrons of my brain, but the memory of it may last for a lifetime!
roles of the judiciary
Answer:
first of all the existence of judicary in acountry is the main agent for making peace full society
The judiciary has an important role to play in the implementation of UPR recommendations as it:
Applies the law, the constitution and international human rights standards;
Calls for reform of laws and policies;
Facilitates access to justice.
Explanation:
Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judicial branch administers justice in the name of the State. The law is interpreted and applied by courts, tribunals, judges, and lawyers. These actors comprise the judicial system as a whole.
By ensuring fair dispute resolution, upholding rights, and bringing culprits to justice, the judiciary contributes to citizen trust and social peace. To that end, it performs its function of administering justice in an independent, impartial, transparent, dependable, efficient, and timely manner.
Further, the judiciary upholds the concept of quality services, which includes equality, non-discrimination, and the broadest possible access to justice.
Describe the role of federal courts in checking the power of the legislative branch.
The last Epistle Paul wrote was:
Titus
2 Thessalonians
2 Timothy
Philemon
Romans
Answer:
2 Timothy
Explanation:
Answer: 2 Timothy
Explanation: The Second Epistle to Timothy is one of the three pastoral epistles traditionally attributed to Paul the Apostle. Addressed to Timothy, a fellow missionary, it is traditionally considered to be the last epistle he wrote before his death.
How does specialization enable countries to trade with one another?
Answer:
Specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing. This can be because they have an abundance of a particular resource, such as oil or timber, or because they have developed expertise in a particular industry, such as manufacturing or technology. By specializing in the production of certain goods or services, countries can take advantage of economies of scale and produce a larger quantity at a lower cost.
For example, a country with an abundance of fertile land and a favorable climate for agriculture may specialize in producing and exporting food products, such as grains or fruits. Another country with a strong technology sector may specialize in producing and exporting high-tech goods, such as computers or smartphones. By trading with one another, these countries can each specialize in what they are best at and benefit from the lower prices and higher quality of the goods and services that they import.
Specialization also enables countries to take advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. For example, a country with a lower cost of labor may be able to produce goods at a lower cost than another country, making it more competitive in the global market. By specializing in the production of goods that they can produce at a lower cost, countries can increase their exports and boost their economies.
Overall, specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing, and by taking advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. This helps to create a more efficient global economy and allows countries to benefit from the goods and services produced by other countries.
A forensic pathologist finds food in the digestive system of a victim's body. What can MOST likely be concluded about the victim's time of death?
OA. The victim was alive at least 12 hours ago.
B. The victim was alive in the last 6 hours.
ОС. The victim was alive in the last 30 minutes.
OD. The victim was alive about 10 hours ago.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
To help relieve traffic congestion:
1. Avoid rubbernecking
2. Tailgate
3. Weave in and out of traffic
what is the role of government agencies in solving public problems?
generally, how many supreme court justices have to agree to review a case from the us courts of appeals?
Answer:
Four out of Nine need to agree
The statute of __________ is the state law that sets a time limit on when someone can legally file a collection suit on a past-due account.
Answer:
liberty
Explanation: