The answer is pleading is filed by the defendant. Option C is correct.
Who is defendant?In legal proceedings, a defendant is defined as a person or thing that is either the party being acted or engaged for a crime in a criminal case or the party that break the law and rules or a party being sued for some sort of civil relief in a civil case.
The defendant person may show or present the proof that the crime for which he is incriminated was committed by a third party. Such accumulation is crucial since it tends to decrease the expectation that the incriminated acted in the crime.
His defense speech had a momentous consequence on the defendant's verdict. Only that sum could be found from a loser defendant. The wife was then afforded that tenancy by the second defendant.
Therefore, option C, answer is correct, regarding the defendant.
Learn more about the defendant, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/12441773
#SPJ5
When could our First Amendment rights be limited?
Hi PLEASE HELP ASAP.!! so back in pro-life month, my teacher and I had a little argument over something literally so silly. It was about whether ted Bundy did or didn't deserve the death penalty. I said, "frick yes". Well, I didn't actually say that, but I did make my point come across, which was that he did deserve to die. She failed me bc she disagreed. Now, I have to write a debate essay, I need at least 10 reasons why he did deserve it. I literally wrote one back in February with like 15 reasons but she said I need to re-write that and use different reasons. Can anyone help me with that? Like, (as if it wasn't obvious) why did he deserve the chair?
There are several reasons why Ted Bundy deserved the death penalty. He killed a lot of people
Reasons why the death penalty was an adequate punishment for Ted Bundy:He killed a lot of people in the society.He was a predator.He raped people.He was a kidnapperHe had no mercy for the people he attacked.He was jailed, he escaped from Jail and still killed again.If granted parole in years later, someone like him would still atatck innocents again.It was the good that the society got rid of him. People like him would always be a danger to other good people.The people that he killed did not deserve to die also. He was only made to tast his own medicine.Read more on the death penalty here: https://brainly.com/question/509558
what classes do you need to take to be a immigration lawyer
Answer:
Educational Requirements
In order to practice law as an immigration lawyer, one must have a bachelor's degree and a Juris Doctor Law degree. During law school, in order to specialize in immigration law, the course load includes classes in citizenship, advising, interviewing and statutory analysis.
Explanation:
Alcohol does not influence your choices
Answer: false
Explanation: inhibitions are lost – leading to poor decision making skills. individuals are more likely to be impulsive
which of the following is the equation for determining the coefficient friction
The equation for determining the coefficient of friction is:
coefficient of friction = frictional force / normal force
What is the explanation for the above response?The coefficient of friction is a dimensionless scalar quantity that measures the resistance of two objects to slide against each other.
It is denoted by the symbol "μ" and can be expressed as the ratio of the force required to move one surface over another to the normal force pressing the two surfaces together. In other words, it quantifies the frictional force that acts between two objects when they are in contact and at rest or in motion. The value of the coefficient of friction ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater frictional force.
Learn more about coefficient friction at:
https://brainly.com/question/13828735
#SPJ1
Which parties comprise the US Supreme Court?
Answer:
United States and eight associate justices.
Legal cases: Sheldon v. Sill, United States v. L...
Jurisdiction: United States
Person: John Roberts
Explanation:
Why is a strict liability tort more challenging to defend?
It usually is accompanied by a separate criminal case.
It is the type of tort that captures the most public attention.
The plaintiff does not need to prove all elements of negligence.
The damages claimed by the plaintiff are impossible to measure.
It is more challenging to defend a strict liability tort because the damages claimed by the plaintiff are impossible to measure. The last option is correct.
A tort is defined as an act or omission that causes hurt or harm to another and constitutes a civil wrong for which courts impose liability. Strict responsibility in tort law is the imposition of duty on a party without a finding of fault (such as carelessness or tortious intent). The claimant merely needs to show that the tort happened and that the respondent was at fault.
The fault of a defendant is irrelevant in a strict liability lawsuit. However, a plaintiff must demonstrate that there were injuries or damages sustained and that those injuries or damages were sustained as a result of the defendant's hazardous or intrinsically dangerous activities.
Thus, the damages claimed by the plaintiff are impossible to measure in a tort law involving strict liability.
To learn more on tort, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669139
#SPJ1
Aceable The maximum speed you can travel and steer quickly out of the way is____
Answer choices
•60mph
•65mph
•there is no maximum
•75 mph
Answer:
75
Explanation:
because at 75mph the car will be moving fast and the driver might lose control of the car
what is inter personal relationship
How court decisions have dynamically altered the American political landscape?
Court decisions have played a significant role in shaping the American political landscape. Through their interpretation of the Constitution and other laws.
What are some of the key examples of court decisions that have dynamically altered the American political landscape?The concept of judicial review was established in Marbury v. Madison (1803), which provides the courts the authority to examine the legality of legislation passed by Congress and the executive branch's activities.
The power balance between the executive and legislative branches of government has been shaped by this choice throughout American history.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) that upheld the legality of slavery, denied citizenship to African Americans and this has increased the tension and led to Civil War in 1861.
In the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, segregation in public schools was ruled to be unconstitutional. This significant ruling contributed to improve racial equality in the United States and was a major success for the Civil Rights Movement.
Roe v. Wade (1973) established the constitutional right to privacy and struck down state laws that banned abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy, this decision has been the subject of ongoing political and cultural debate.
To know more about constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
3. Many countries do different things in their elections. For example in Australia, you can be fined if you don't vote. In France, there is a news blackout for the 48 hours prior to election day...there can be no appearances by the candidates and nothing can be said on TV or in newspapers about the election...except to say that it is being held. In England and Canada, elections are done very quickly...none of this two years of running for office that we see in American elections. In what ways would you change the election processes in the United States? In what ways are you ok with what we have? List or describe three thoughts
Here are three thoughts on potential changes and areas of satisfaction:
Potential Changes:
Election Duration: Some people might suggest shortening the duration of election campaigns in the United States, as they can be lengthy and costly. Reducing the campaign period could potentially reduce expenses and the influence of money in politics.
Voting Obligation: Some individuals may propose implementing a compulsory voting system, similar to what exists in Australia. The idea is that making voting mandatory could increase voter turnout and promote civic engagement.
Election Communication Regulations: There could be discussions around implementing stricter regulations on election-related communications, similar to the news blackout in France. Limiting campaign advertising or certain types of messaging in the days leading up to the election might aim to reduce potential biases or misinformation.
Areas of Satisfaction:
Freedom of Speech: The United States' strong protection of freedom of speech allows for a wide range of political discourse and expression during election campaigns. This allows candidates and citizens to voice their opinions, engage in debates, and freely express their political views.
Election Accessibility: The United States has made efforts to enhance voting accessibility, such as through early voting options, mail-in voting, and accommodations for individuals with disabilities. These measures aim to ensure that citizens can exercise their right to vote conveniently and inclusively.
Democratic Processes: The U.S. electoral system, with its separation of powers, checks and balances, and regular elections, is designed to uphold democratic principles. Many appreciate the democratic foundations and institutions that facilitate the peaceful transition of power and provide opportunities for citizen participation.
Maya, age 16, has been charged with the crime of shoplifting. The case against her is fairly tight since she was seen putting items in her purse and later the items were found with her. Maya has never been in trouble before; however, shoplifting is a serious crime, regardless of the offender's age. When the magistrate or judge decides that the charge will stand, where would they MOST likely send Maya?
Question 3 options:
She will be released on her own recognizance.
She will be released into the custody of her parents.
A bail of $1000 will be set for Maya.
Maya will be detained in a juvenile facility until trial.
If the magistrate or judge decides that the charge will stand, the place they would they MOST likely send Maya is: B. She will be released into the custody of her parents.
What is shoplifting?Shoplifting can be defined as an act of stealing or committing a theft in which a person tend to steal an item that does not belong to them and then hide the item so as to prevent others from seeing the item when leaving the place the person stole.
Example of shoplifting is when a person stole an item in supermarket and then hide the items.
Based on the scenario since she is under 18 and the item was well found with her , the judge will released her into her parent custody.
Therefore the correct option is B.
Learn more about shoplifting here:https://brainly.com/question/28347372
#SPJ1
Is there a time you felt as if you needed to fix your attitude?
Answer:yes here are some ways to do so
1)Always act with a purpose. 2)Stretch yourself past your limits every day. ... 3)Take action without expecting results. ... Use setbacks to improve your skills. ... Seek out those who share your positive attitude. ... Don't take yourself so seriously. ... Forgive the limitations of others.
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
Eric works as a senior FBI agent, and thus serves as an active member of the country’s most important federal law enforcement agency. Which of these responsibilities would Eric be obliged to carry out as a member of the FBI?
A.
operating state and county jails
B.
intervening in domestic disputes
C.
protecting courthouses
D.
investigating cybercrime
E.
inspecting highway accidents
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Brenda was discussing how easy it would be to rob the coffee shop with her friends. After talking about how they would get away with it, they all agreed they would put their plans to work the following afternoon. That night Brenda had a bad dream and decided she no longer wanted to go through with it and went about her day as she usually would. Her friends stuck to the plan and were arrested. Can Brenda use the withdrawal defense? Why or why not?
In the given situation Brenda can use the withdrawal defense as she never committed the crime.
What do we mean by withdrawal defense?When a defendant argues that he or she never started, or was not participated in, a criminal act because they both abandoned or withdrew from it before it happened, this is known as an affirmative criminal defense.
The abandonment defense, which partially falls under the jurisdiction of both actus reus and men's rea, is used to argue that the defendant did not participate in or complete a criminal act because they gave up their involvement before the crime was really committed.
Therefore, in the given situation Brenda can use the withdrawal defense as she never committed the crime.
Know more about defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/30497794
#SPJ1
Pls helpppppppppppppp
Robbers attack your house in the middle of the night. They want to steal your family's money and precious things (laptop, cellphone, jewelry, TV, etc.) You notice them, but your mom and dad are calmly sleeping. You do not know if they have guns or knives.
What are you going to do?
A. Wake up everyone and fight them! (Be Courageous)
B. Be quiet and pretend to sleep! (Be Safe, It's not worth it!)
Answer:
i think i would go with A. because you have notice them, look if they have a weapon, then you would take a photo, call the cops and wake everyone up.
this is what i would say
Officers responded to a robbery in progress at a convenience store. A young man with red hair was seen fleeing the scene. Investigators found blood on a broken plate of glass at the storefront and analyze it for DNA. Forensic biologists are unable to match the DNA to anyone in the crime database, so they turn to SNP analysis to do what?
A.
Check the blood for mutations
B.
Double check the information.
C.
See if the DNA predicts the blood is from a redhead.
D.
Evaluate if they did the first test correctly.
When forensic biologists are unable to match DNA from a crime scene to any individual in the crime database, they may use SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) analysis to further explore the DNA sample.Option C is the correct answer.
SNP analysis looks for differences in single nucleotides within a DNA sequence. In the case of the convenience store robbery, detectives would use SNP analysis to discover if the DNA sample included certain genetic markers associated with red hair.
Red hair is a genetic characteristic induced mostly by a mutation in the MC1R gene. This gene is in charge of producing melanin, the pigment that controls hair color. Forensic biologists can determine if an individual will have red hair by analysing the SNP patterns associated with the MC1R gene.
As a result, forensic biologists can establish whether the DNA sample obtained on the broken plate of glass includes the genetic markers associated with red hair by doing SNP analysis on it. If the SNP analysis indicates that the DNA came from a person with red hair, it could give a vital lead for police, reducing their hunt for the perpetrator.
Therefore the correct answer is option C
For more questions on crime database
https://brainly.com/question/30030030
#SPJ8
US law enforcement has been expanding its use of drones for surveillance. However, very few privacy laws exist to limit how law enforcers can use these drones. Discuss your opinion about the increased use of drones. Do you think it’s an invasion of privacy?
Answer: yes and no
Explanation: Yes the drones can invade your privacy and might captured embarrassing things also
No cause drones help captured anything suspicious or help with a case
A group of people assemble on the National Mall in Washington D.C., to demand the withdrawal of the U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
-7th amendment
-10th amendment
-2nd amendemnt
-1st amendment
A group of people assembles on the National Mall in Washington D.C., to demand the withdrawal of the U.S. troops from Afghanistan is the scenario of the 1st amendment. Thus, option D is correct.
What is an amendment?
Amendment can be defined as the pathway where the constitution makes the rules and regulations and there can be further changes that can happen depending on the needs and the changes.
No act establishing a particular religion, forbidding its practice, restricting press or expression freedom, or restricting the ability of the citizens to peacefully gather and seek the administration for the satisfaction of complaints may be passed by Congress.
Religious freedom, independence of speech, rights of assembly, plus even the ability to petition are all protected under the First Amendment. It prohibits Congress from endorsing one denomination above another and without limiting a person's ability to practice their religion.
Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ5
What would be several advantages and disadvantages of living under a
Dictator?
Advantages
Low crime rates.
In a dictatorship, usually, there are very strict rules and punishment for even a small crime or violation of the law. Such strict punishments arise threat among people. Thus there are lower crimes as compared to the countries which do not have a dictator form of government.
Rapid progression
The dictators have access and control over everything right from the economy to the laws and the people. Hence they do not have to worry about this field. They set their goals in which they have to progress and develop. The absence of other concerns helps them to achieve their goal easily.
Efficient administration
They set the rules and regulations which they think are suitable. No one amongst the citizens dares to object them. Because there is no consultation or debates taking place over any issue, hence quick actions can be taken. This makes a dictator country always stay ahead of rival nations.
We get a stable government.
There’s less space for corruption amongst citizens.
They prove very crucial during the times of emergency. Because there’s only one person taking the decision so there’s no last moment ambiguity in opinions. However in case something goes wrong the person responsible is only blamed.
Disadvantages
It leads to abuse of power. The dictator misuses his power at the expense of the citizens.
Dictators always oppress and suppress the people. Or even promote their own favorites and interests. This causes inequality but no one really objects because it would mean putting oneself in danger at the hands of the ruling government.
Mass killings. Large numbers of innocent people are killed. Because the people might get frustrated with the policies of the government and this makes the dictator consider the person ad enemies of the government.
The population is never happy with such a government. So it’s possible that at some point the masses will protest and agitate against the policies of unity and try to overthrow the government. This dictatorship is not permanent and never sustains for long. It somehow leads to war. At present North Korea is the biggest example of power dictatorship and the country is so advanced with all its technologies and nuclear weapons that despite this being the 21st century even if multiple countries join hands and come along to wage war against it then they will suffer a greater loss and does not even ensures their victory.
그것이 당신에게 도움이되기를 바랍니다
가장 똑똑한 것으로 표시하십시오
좋은 하루 되세요
What do you think would be the most difficult type of evidence fingerprint, hair, or blood spatter to collect/analyze and why?
Answer: I think blood splatter
Explanation: Because multiple people can have the same blood type but the others are all unique to different people
PAY NO ATTENTION
TO THE MAN OUTSIDE,
SENATOR
LOBBYIST
b. What is this cartoon suggesting about lobbyists?
Answer:
Lobbyist do not care about the voters. (The voter is outside, looking in through the window)
Explanation:
A lobbyist is a person who is employed by and acts for an organized interest group or corporation to try to influence policy decisions and positions in the executive and legislative branches.
Please help will mark brainliest
Answer:
When someone is accused of breaking a law.
Explanation:
Your welcome!
is it a sin to god to go from christianity to islam
Answer:
Yes and no
Explanation:
because at the end your are doing something good
The punitive conditions are used only for the most severe crimes and usually result in incarceration.
True or False
Tricia found a body that is in rigor mortis. How was she MOST likely to determine that this was happening?
A.
The body was the temperature of the air surrounding it.
B. The body was very rigid and stiff.
C.
The body had pools of blood in it.
D.
The body had lost a lot of tissue and was mainly bones.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Monarchy in the UK ()
Read the statement below:
"Due to the recent scandals in the UK with regards to their
monarchy, we need to stop allowing people with royal bloodline
rights to hold power over the affairs of the British citizens. Regular
people should be able to be voted for to become part of the royal
family moving forward, based on their benefit to the country and
social standing
How far do you agree with the statement? Give examples, and
opinions formed from your lessons this term and your wider research
and understanding of the U.K. Monarchy.
Answer:In a monarchy, a king or queen is Head of State. The British Monarchy is known as a constitutional monarchy. This means that, while The Sovereign is Head of State, the ability to make and pass legislation resides with an elected Parliament.
Although The Sovereign no longer has a political or executive role, he or she continues to play an important part in the life of the nation.
As Head of State, The Monarch undertakes constitutional and representational duties which have developed over one thousand years of history. In addition to these State duties, The Monarch has a less formal role as 'Head of Nation'. The Sovereign acts as a focus for national identity, unity and pride; gives a sense of stability and continuity; officially recognises success and excellence; and supports the ideal of voluntary service.
which statement best completes the diagram? need answered asap please n thanks
The statement that best completes the diagram is option A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces Enlightenment ideas to its readers.
What is the statement about?The Pennsylvania Gazette, established by the esteemed Benjamin Franklin, was highly circulated throughout the colonies and effectively promoted the tenets of the Enlightenment, such as personal freedoms, reason, and inherent entitlements, to the general populace.
Therefore, The colonial leaders were significantly influenced by Enlightenment principles, leading to their ratification of the Declaration of Independence during the Second Continental Congress.
Learn more about Enlightenment from
https://brainly.com/question/1688832
#SPJ1
See text below
Question 1 of 10
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Diagram is:
The Second Continental Congressratifies the Declaration of Independence.
__
Enlightenment ideas are introduced in Europe.
Options
A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces
Enlightenment ideas to its readers.
B. British military forces are told to withdraw from the colonies as
punishment for their disloyalty.
C. Colonial leaders reject the concept of natural rights because of its
association with Great Britain.
D. British leaders conclude that the only way to control the colonies.
is by enforcing a strict social contract
John Locke’s theories on natural rights were incorporated into the: Magna Carta. Stamp Act. English Bill of Rights. Declaration of Independence.
Answer:
Explanation:
English Bill of Rights.