Answers
Answer:
I do believe it's B
Explanation:
if you look at the other options they wouldn't fit into what is already in the boxes.
Related Questions
Which term is defined as an attempt by a libel defendant to enhance its defense by claiming that the statement over which it is being sued made the defendant a public figure
Answers
Possibly the letter C I believe
Explanation:
Who did Plato regard as a “just man”?
“I declare that justice is nothing else than that which advantageous to the stronger. It follows that the just man is he who obeys the laws of the governing group; the unjust man disregards them. But, the subject who obeys hurts himself and promotes the good of others. It pays, therefore, to act unjustly.”
Answers
Answer:
There’s a part of Plato’s Republic (c. 380 BC) which is fascinating because it resembles a prophecy about Jesus. It appears in this dialog by Socrates about the just man, especially in the italicized portion:
And at [the unjust man’s] side let us place the just man in his nobleness and simplicity, wishing, as Aeschylus says, to be and not to seem good. There must be no seeming, for if he seem to be just he will be honoured and rewarded, and then we shall not know whether he is just for the sake of justice or for the sake of honours and rewards; therefore, let him be clothed in justice only, and have no other covering; and he must be imagined in a state of life the opposite of the former. Let him be the best of men, and let him be thought the worst; then he will have been put to the proof; and we shall see whether he will be affected by the fear of infamy and its consequences. And let him continue thus to the hour of death; being just and seeming to be unjust. When both have reached the uttermost extreme, the one of justice and the other of injustice, let judgment be given which of them is the happier of the two.
what is racial discrimination
Answers
Race discrimination is when anyone is treated unfairly because of their race, or because of the race of someone they are connected with, such as their partner.
‘Race’ includes colour, citizenship, nationality, and ethnic or national origins. It is against the law to harass a person because the person belongs to a different race or color.
Color discrimination involves treating someone not properly or unfairly because of skin color complexion. Racial discrimination arises as one of the biggest social issues.
Discrimination is the unfair or prejudicial treatment of people and groups based on characteristics such as age, gender, race or sexual orientation. Discrimination can occur when the victim and the person who inflicted the discrimination are of the same race or color.
Learn more about racial discrimination,
brainly.com/question/2864094
brainly.com/question/22630099
Answer: I hope this helps you have a good day
Explanation:
Racial discrimination is any discrimination against any individual on the basis of their skin color, race or ethnic origin. Individuals can discriminate by refusing to do business with, socialize with, or share resources with people of a certain group.
Race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features). Color discrimination involves treating someone unfavorably because of skin color complexion.Race/color discrimination also can involve treating someone unfavorably because the person is married to (or associated with) a person of a certain race or color.Discrimination can occur when the victim and the person who inflicted the discrimination are the same race or color.Race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features).
Whose human rights are more important in this situation? Explain.
What options might Mr. Zimmerman have for addressing the problem of shoplifting in his store?
Answers
Mr. Zimmerman's human rights are important in this situation.
What are Human Rights?Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to each and every person in the world, from birth until his/her death.
The parents believe that in this situation teens' human rights have been violated. Mr. Zimmerman says he is just trying to protect his own human rights and those of his other customers. Mr. Zimmerman says the increase in shoplifting has decreased his profits and that he may have to close the store if shoplifting continues at the same rate.
Therefore, Mr. Zimmerman's human rights are important in this situation.
Learn more about Human Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ1
what are all the functions of a political party?
Answers
Please answer these questions:
1. What kinds of cases does the judicial branch oversee?
2. When are trials not by jury?
Answers
Answer:
1 . Federal courts hear criminal, civil, and bankruptcy cases. And once a case is decided, it can often be appealed.
2 . In the federal court system, under rule 23 of the rules of Federal Criminal Procedure, if a defendant is entitled to a jury trial, the trial must be by jury unless (1) the defendant waives a jury trial in writing, (2) the government consents, and (3) the court approves.
Suppose you are a defense attorney. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a criminal defendant testify at trial?
Answers
Answer:
As a juror, I hope that I would respect the defendant’s right not to testify. I realize that there are many reasons that someone might not want to testify in their own case beyond wanting to hide their guilt. For example, criminal cases sometimes involve complex legal arguments, and a defendant might be terrified that, although they are innocent, they might unwittingly say something that strengthens the case of the prosecution.
Explanation:
hehe hi
Criminal defense attorney is the lawyer that specialized in the army unit of peoples and companies bucked with criminal action.
What is the criminal defense attorney?A defense attorney is also called as a defense lawyer. He is an attorney, symbolising a suspect in a case or criminal prosecution.
Attorneys representing a suspect in a criminal suit and are officially called as “criminal defense attorneys".
A criminal defense attorney can support a person to voyage through the criminal justice system, prepare and assert the legal defense, and ensure that the people's rights are defended throughout the process.
Advantages and disadvantages of criminal defendant:
The advantages of the criminal defendant are:
The defendant may travel up with a lighter word string than if they had taken their chances with a court trial.There's a legal experience to the defendant.Due to the lower cost of the defendant, it is affordable by anyone.There is a familiarity between the lawyer and the clients.The disadvantages of the criminal defendant are:
Lack of Training and Knowledge.Inferior Argument Skills.Delays in taking the actions.Therefore, the criminal defense attorney symbolizes the suspect in the criminal cases.
Learn more about the defense attorney, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8134994
1) Giving a turn signal
allows the vehicles behind to adjust their speed in time.
when you initiate the turn
anytime while making a turn
at least one mile before want to make a turn
just before you make a turn
from a minimum of 100 feet before you make a turn
Answers
We can complete the sentence as follows: 1) Giving a turn signal when you initiate the turn allows the vehicles behind to adjust their speed in time.
When you should give a turn signalYou should give a turn signal when you initiate the turn. This immediately alerts the other road users likely following behind you to apply caution as they approach a turn.
Giving this signal on time ensures that all are made aware and not taken by surprise when you eventually make the turn. So, the signal should be given when you initiate a turn.
Learn more about turn signals here;
https://brainly.com/question/31673943
#SPJ1
Many who have experienced mediation say that they have more control over the resolution. Which of the following statements best explains that sentiment?
O Mediation also works in businesses, in commercial disputes, in neighborhood disagreements. It is great!
© Mediation is achieved by legal professionals that assist two or more persons to reach a settlement.
O Mediation is confidential.
I thought I was 100 percent right, and mediation taught me that there are two sides and there are ways of solving disagreements.
Answers
Many who have experienced meditation say that they have more control over the resolution the statements best explains that sentiment is meditation is confidential.
What is meditation?Your sensation of quiet, peace, and balance that meditation can bring you can help your physical and emotional health. By concentrating your attention on something peaceful, you can also utilize it to unwind and manage stress. You can learn to keep your focus and maintain inner serenity by practicing meditation.5 guidelines for effective meditation Being mindful of the present.controlling the negative thoughts.being conscious of the meditation toolwaking up to reality.unflinching dedication.The fact that meditation generates changes in our awareness is what makes it so effective.Many people identify too strongly with their thoughts and feelings, which prolongs them and makes them seem larger than life. We can suffer from certain ideas or emotions for days on end.To learn more about meditation from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/19069324
#SPJ13
What is the main role of a jury in a criminal trial?
O A. To determine whether the prosecution has proved the defendant
guilty
B. To decide on a sentence for a person convicted of a serious crime
O C. To decide which pieces of evidence should be considered during
deliberation
O D. To give an appeals court permission to review a verdict made by a
lower court
Answers
Answer:
A. To determine whether the prosecution has proved the defendant
guilty
The main role of a jury in a criminal trial is to determine whether the prosecution has proved the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, Option A. is correct.
It is crucial that the jury members remain neutral and unbiased since the jury's involvement in a criminal trial is important. Therefore, this is a very crucial duty because the jury's verdict could have a major impact on the defendant's life.
The sentence for the defendant is not up to the jury to decide. The judge is responsible for this. The judge may request the jury to suggest a sentence, but the jury's proposal is not required.
Therefore, the correct option is option A.
Learn more about criminal trials, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31658194
#SPJ5
Investigating careers. Answer quick, 80 points.
One of the main issues pre-school teachers face is helping kids do which of the following?
A. be away from their parents
B. learn a different language
C. pass standardized tests
D. graduate pre-school
Answers
Answer:
Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.
In England in the 18th century, when men on prison hulks had done all of the local project repairs that were needed, what happened to them?
O They were released because that paid their debt.
O They were shipped to Australia and America to work on projects there.
O They were allowed to spend time at home with their families.
O They were sent to penitentiaries, locked up to think about what they'd done.
Answers
For nearly a century, these ships were used as "temporary" prisons. There is no denying the harshness of life in the prison hulks. Inmates were chained in irons and had to get up every day at 5 a.m., work hard for ten hours in the summer, seven in the winter, and finish at 7 p.m.
In hulks, how were convicts treated?
This was done intentionally because the parliamentary act that allowed for the use of hulks stipulated that convicts would only be fed bread, "any coarse or inferior food," water, and small beers. Convicts frequently experienced malnutrition and hunger.
When were hulks used in prison?
In the 18th and 19th centuries, authorities used decommissioned ships as floating prisons. These were called "prison hulks." In England, they were used a lot.
To learn more about prison hulks here:
https://brainly.com/question/13103453
#SPJ1
Answer: B, they were shipped to Australia and America to work on projects there.
Explanation:
What are the primary arguments offered for reforming the practice of holding until trial poor individuals charged with a misdemeanor who cannot afford to pay bail
Answers
Answer:
increased likelihood of conviction
-increased guilty pleas for those kept in jail
-negative effects on their employment
Explanation:
Prior to the prison reform process, an alleged offender is held in custody until trial no matter how long. Therefore, some alleged offenders spend a sizeable number of time in custody before the actual trial begins and judgement is subsequently passed. In other to correct for this unfair treatment, arguments put up include an increasing likelihood of being convicted as they are being treated as convicts, they are no longer afforded the treatment given to a normal individual. The lack of funds gives an increasing likelihood of been pronounced convict. They are also in danger of losing their jobs as they are restricted for going to work and likely to be replaced rendering them enempliyed.
Which concept is central to the idea of due process in the United States?
- Defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
-Prosecutors prove guilt with a preponderance of evidence.
-Witnesses are required to testify against themselves.
-Citizens must provide their own legal representation.
Answers
The concept that is central to the idea of due process in the United States is that Defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The Option A is correct.
What is Due process?Generally, a due process of law is an application of all legal rules and principles pertaining to the case so that all legal rights that are owed to the person are respected.
The due process helps to balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following due process of the law, this constitutes a due process violation which offends the rule of law.
Read more about due process
brainly.com/question/711394
#SPJ1
two reasons why the ratio decidendi of a case may sometimes be difficult to establish. Use an example from civil or criminal law to illustrate one of your suggested reasons (5 marks)
Answers
It can be challenging to demonstrate the ratio decidendi, or the legal arguments underlying a court decision, for a number of reasons.
What is ratio decidendi?The essential issue in a case known as the ratio decidendi determines the ruling or the rule that the case adopts. The conclusion of the case depends on a legal rule that was formed as a part of, legal reasoning in a ruling.
The complex ethical and legal dilemmas involved, it may be challenging to determine the ratio decidendi of the case. The worth of human life had to be evaluated by the court against the principles of urgency and self-defense.
Learn more about ratio decidendi, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30817083
#SPJ1
The Eighth Amendment protects citizens from "cruel and unusual punishment." Why was this historically an important right to the framers
of the Constitution?
Answers
The British enacted punishments upon citizens in the American colonies that were cruel and unusual is an important right to the framers of the Constitution.
What is constitution?A Constitution is a set of laws and principles that outline the form of government, outline the rights and duties of citizens, and define the powers and duties of the government. It is a document that is the foundation of a political system and is the highest law of the land. It typically includes a bill of rights that serves to protect the citizens from the government. It also includes the rules for how government officials are elected, how laws are made, and how the government is organized. Constitutions can be amended, as needed, to reflect changing times and circumstances.
To learn more about Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/29972878
#SPJ1
What was used to represent the lives lost in work zone incidents across the State of Texas during the Work Zone Awareness Week ceremony
Answers
Answer:orange cones
Explanation:
this is for civic
In which case would the U.S. Supreme Court have original jurisdiction? O A dispute between a citizen of Florida and the Florida Department of Revenue. O A dispute between a citizen of Florida and a hotel owner in California over a civil rights issue. O A dispute between the governments of Belgium and France over their boundaries. O A dispute between North Dakota and South Dakota over diverting water from the Missouri River.
Answers
The case that would the U.S. Supreme Court have original jurisdiction is the dispute between the governments of Belgium and France over their boundaries. The Option C is correct.
What is the original jurisdiction of U.S. Supreme Court?According to the Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction when it is the first and only Court to hear a case.
The Constitution restricts cases involving original jurisdiction to those involving disputes between states or disputes between ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers. Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review lower court decisions. The majority of cases heard by the Supreme Court are appeals from lower courts.
Read more about original jurisdiction
brainly.com/question/9178757
#SPJ1
Children and pets left in a car: On a nice, temperate day of 72°F, how quickly can the inside of a car get to a very dangerous 112°F? (be mindful that danger does not start at 112"F, it
starts before that these numbers are just facts that are frames of reference).
Select one:
O a. In about an hour
O b. In about 2 hours
O c. In about 3 hours
O d. In about 4 hours
In it alright to coast your car?
Answers
In about 2 hours. It is never safe to leave children or pets unattended in a car, even if you plan to "coast" it. Therefore, the correct answer is O b.
The correct option is (b) In about 2 hours.
On a nice, temperate day of 72°F, the inside of a car can reach a dangerous 112°F in approximately two hours. It is crucial to understand that leaving children or pets unattended in a vehicle, even for a short period, can lead to life-threatening situations. The temperature inside a parked car can rise rapidly, especially during warm weather, putting occupants at risk of heatstroke, dehydration, and other health complications. It is never safe to leave children or pets alone in a car, even if you plan to "coast" it. It is important to prioritize their safety by ensuring they are never left in a vehicle without proper supervision and adequate ventilation.Therefore, the correct answer to the question is O b.
For more such questions on Coast:
https://brainly.com/question/21107950
#SPJ8
Which of the following business transactions is not covered by consumer protection laws?
Buying a car from the dealership
Buying a tv from Best Buy
Buying a used car from your neighbor
Buying a washing machine from Walmart
Answers
I THINK ITS CORRECT ANSWER IS......
Buying a used car from your neighbour
When accused of a Felony, the accused has the right to a Grand Jury hearing according to the
Answers
FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Lorne is charged with assaulting his brother with a deadly weapon. There is no dispute about his identity. The main issue for trial is whether or not he intended to cause serious harm to his brother. The prosecutor wants to introduce a video taken of Lorne at his brother's wedding, three years earlier. Lorne, in a brunken rage, lunged at his brother with a steak knife, screaming that he would *ill him. Since the weapon in this case is also a knife, the prosecutor feels the video shows that Lorne has murderous intent toward his brother and uses knives as weapons.
Would the video evidence be helpful to proving the case?
Answers
Answer:
this isnt enough evedince as someone who is d runk cant control all of there body functionss, when d runk someone can do/say things they wouldnt normally say or do.
Explanation:
Answer:
since there is evidence that people can control all of their body when dr unk this case should not escalate into a full blow trial the is not a proven fact that when dr Unk you have no control this is a rather a simple matter of a family feud
the video would not be help full
Explanation:
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
olivia the one sitting on the couch next to me answer
Answers
Answer:
hsshshwhegzhbsbsbsbsbs
How did Goffman become interested in this alternate path of prison that some kids take on their way to adulthood? Explain.
Answers
Answer:
As a college student at The University of Pennsylvania she saw and met kids who didn’t grow up in the best families and didn’t get the opportunities like other kids did. These kids were practically shipped off to prison and the ones who had good opportunities in life didn’t.
Other questions and answers:
4.What kind of games did Goffman see children in the neighborhood playing? What does this tell you about what these kids are seeing in their community? Explain.
She had seen kids playing a game of chase. Kids would split up into two groups, those being chased and those doing the catching. If they were caught, they would get handcuffed. This tells me that kids are seeing things they shouldn’t be seeing in their communities.
5.What did Goffman do and what did she witness in the first 18 months that she lived in the neighborhood? Discuss your reaction to this and how this compares to where you live?
She says that she wrote down every time she witnesses her neighbors had an interaction with thepolice, In the first 18 months she witnesses police stop people in cars, they would search them,
Please give me a 5 star rating!
Answer:
As a college student at The University of Pennsylvania she saw and met kids who didn’t grow up in the best families and didn’t get the opportunities like other kids did. These kids were practically shipped off to prison and the ones who had good opportunities in life didn’t.
Explanation:
E2020
This road sign means
Answers
Answer:
It means there is road work ahead. Construction stuff to look out for.
Answer:
road work ahead
Explanation:
Distinguish between the concepts of governmental crime, state crime, and political white collar crime. Identify as well the special significance of the following concepts: abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal. In what respects are the first set of concepts controversial, and how do they relate to the traditional concept of white collar crime? Why has governmental crime been relatively neglected by criminologists?
Answers
1. Governmental Crime: Governmental crime refers to criminal activities committed by individuals or groups within the government or associated with government functions. This can include illegal actions such as abuse of power, human rights violations, illegal surveillance, and misconduct by government officials.
2. State Crime: State crime involves illegal actions that are perpetrated or sanctioned by the state itself. This includes crimes committed in the pursuit of state policies or interests, such as war crimes, genocide, torture, and state-sponsored terrorism.
3. Political White-Collar Crime: Political white-collar crime refers to illegal activities committed by individuals in positions of political power or influence, often involving financial fraud, bribery, embezzlement, or other forms of corruption. These crimes typically occur in political contexts and involve abuses of power for personal or political gain.
The concepts of abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal have special significance within these contexts:
- Abuse of Power: This refers to the misuse of authority or position for personal or political gain, often involving actions that violate laws, policies, or ethical norms.
- Corruption: Corruption involves the misuse of public power for private gain. It includes actions such as bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and favoritism, which undermine the integrity and fairness of government institutions.
- Bribery: Bribery involves offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value as a means to influence the actions or decisions of a person in a position of power or authority.
- Political Scandal: Political scandals typically involve public exposure and scrutiny of unethical or illegal activities by individuals or groups in the political sphere. These scandals can damage reputations, erode public trust, and have far-reaching political consequences.
The first set of concepts, particularly governmental crime and state crime, can be controversial for several reasons:
1. Lack of Consensus: There may be debates and disagreements over what actions should be considered criminal when committed by governments or states, as the legal framework for defining and prosecuting these offenses can vary across jurisdictions.
2. Sovereign Immunity: Governments and state actors often enjoy certain immunities and legal protections that can make holding them accountable for criminal acts challenging.
3. Political Sensitivity: Investigating and addressing governmental and state crimes can be politically sensitive, as it may involve challenging or questioning the legitimacy and actions of those in power.
These concepts relate to the traditional concept of white-collar crime in that they often involve non-violent offenses committed by individuals in positions of power or influence. However, governmental crime and state crime focus specifically on the actions of government entities or individuals associated with the government, whereas white-collar crime encompasses a broader range of economic and financial offenses committed by individuals in professional or business contexts.
Governmental crime has been relatively neglected by criminologists for various reasons:
1. Focus on Street Crime: Criminology traditionally has had a strong focus on street crime, such as robbery, assault, and drug offenses, while governmental crime has received less attention.
2. Political Factors: Governmental crime involves powerful actors and institutions, making it politically sensitive to investigate and study. This can create obstacles and resistance to research and analysis.
3. Data Availability: Obtaining data on governmental crime can be challenging due to issues of transparency, limited access to official records, and the covert nature of certain crimes.
Please help can figure it out
Answers
Answer:
i would say ur answers are a and b
<3
Explanation:
Who was Clarence Gideon and what was his connection to the Sixth Amendment?
O He was the judge in a major case to prove the right against being charged with the same crime twice.
O He was a victim of a robbery in Florida and he defended himself and won his case.
He was a poor man who could not afford a lawyer, appealed his case, and was later acquitted.
O He was a Florida prosecutor in a landmark case for tenants' rights.
Answers
Answer:
O he was a Florida Prosectutor in a landmark case for tenants rights
Explanation:
Do you believe the federal government increasing power over state governments is a positive or negative thing?