Answer:
I think the answer is A i hope it's right
Explanation:
Answer:
A. The United States Should acquire Texas before it becomes it's own nation
Explanation:
Hope this will help
What did President Johnson mean when he said, "The stories of our Nation and of the American Negro are like two great rivers"?
When President Johnson said, "The stories of our Nation and of the American Negro are like two great rivers," he was using a metaphor to describe the relationship between the history of the United States and the history of African Americans.
The meaning of the speech by President JohnsonJust as two rivers flow together, the histories of the United States and African Americans are interconnected and have shaped each other.
Johnson was acknowledging the integral role that African Americans have played in the history of the United States and recognizing the ongoing struggle for civil rights and equality.
Read more on African Americans here: https://brainly.com/question/891152
#SPJ1
What major conflicts led England to gain or lose land?
There were several major conflicts that led England to gain or lose land throughout history. Some of the significant conflicts include the Norman Conquest, the Hundred Years' War, and the Wars of the Roses. The Norman Conquest of England in 1066 resulted in England losing control over its lands to the Normans.
William the Conqueror became the King of England after the Battle of Hastings, and he redistributed the lands of English nobles to his Norman supporters. This led to the establishment of a new feudal system in England, with Norman lords owning large tracts of land.
England gained territories in France during the Hundred Years' War (1337-1453) fought between England and France. England initially won several battles, including the Battle of Crecy in 1346 and the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, but eventually lost the war.
By the end of the war, England had lost most of its territories in France, including Normandy and Aquitaine. The Wars of the Roses (1455-1485) was a series of conflicts fought between two noble houses, the House of Lancaster and the House of York, for the English throne.
The wars resulted in the loss of many English lives, including nobles and their supporters. The House of York eventually emerged victorious, with Edward IV crowned as the King of England in 1461. However, the wars left England divided and weakened, with many of its nobles and soldiers dead or impoverished.
For more questions on: Wars of the Roses
https://brainly.com/question/1203810
#SPJ8
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
–Schenck v. United States
Use the excerpt to answer the question.
In this excerpt, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explains his ruling in Schenck v. United States. What argument is Holmes making about personal rights and free speech?
A. The constitutional protection of free speech is absolute, and each person has a right to express his or herself however he or she wishes.
B. The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.
C. The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
D. The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.
The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
What is the case of Schenck v. United States?The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Schenck v. United States
brainly.com/question/2764676
#SPJ1
By the early 1700s, religious influence in the American colonies had
Answer:
christian and Jewish religions got america interested.
Explanation:
Explain the difference between Social Darwinism and the Social Gospel.
• What did each school of thought advocate in terms of social policies?
• What actions did each believe the government or individuals should take?
(4 paragraphs please)
Answer:
Social Gospel was a Protestant Christian movement in the 19th and 20th centuries. In Social Darwinism, a person's wealth, social status, and property showed their fitness. Poor people were considered lazy and fell under wealthy people and were seen as weak, or not fit to survive. Social Darwinism favored the wealthy.
Answer:
: The main difference between social Darwinism and the social gospel is the way each of these concepts shows how human beings should react to social problems and issues.
Explanation:
Explain Guerilla Warfare and how it was important to the battle for independence.
Answer:
the British out numbered the u.s. by alot. during this time during battle people would Line fire but we didn't have enough people to do that so we used the element of surprise to win
Answer:
Explanation:
Fighting as a guerrilla was attractive: it would allow men more freedom than they would enjoy in the regular army, and most importantly, would allow them to remain at home to defend their families and communities. Several different kinds of guerrillas emerged during the Civil War.
Which legislation gave African American citizens protection under the law?
O Reconstruction Act of 1867
O Civil Rights Act of 1866
O Freedman's Bureau
O 15th Amendment
Answer:civil rights act of 1866
Explanation:
What were the two political parties that developed after George Washington's presidency?
A
Bostonian and Virginian
B
Democratic-Republican and Federalist
C
Federalist and Democrat
D
Democrat and Washingtonian
What roles do buyers and sellers play in the determination of the market clearing price of a good?
Answer:
Buyers and sellers need to reach an agreement at which price to buy and sell the good and service. This price is called the market clearing price or equilibrium price. At the market clearing price the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied are equal to one another.
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLYLEYST!!
According to the theory of continental drift, the
continents
A. have joined together over time
B. used to be joined together
C. were once several smaller islands
D. have always been separate
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Used to be joined together honestly its even in the name. The continents drifted apart
thats how I remember it
Answer:
Answer is B
Explanation:
The continental theory is that the continents were once joined together but have drifted apart.
What are 2 potential consequences/effects if the
erosion on LA's coast continues?
Answer:
The disruption in oil deliveries, natural gas deliveries, transportation along the Mississippi River, and a loss in fishing and recreations activities occur because of the same natural disaster occurring because of coastal erosion.
Explanation:
5. What methods did the Nazis use to carry out the extermination
of Jewish people and other targeted groups?
Please describe any instances of racism found in the movie FLYBOYS. How were there racial issues resolved.
Answer:
Skinner, a white pilot eventually recognizes the wrongness of his attitude and reaches out with respect and acceptance.
Explanation:
Why is A, B, and C wrong
What was one way that Athens was more democratic than Sparta? *
A. Athenian women had more rights than Spartan women.
B. Slavery was abolished in Athens but not in Sparta.
C. Citizens of Sparta had no say in government, while those of Athens did.
What was one way that Athens was more democratic than Sparta?
A. Athenian women had more rights than Spartan women.
B. Slavery was abolished in Athens but not in Sparta.
C. Citizens of Sparta had no say in government, while those of Athens did.
D. Athens had a true legislature, while Sparta did not
Answer:
D. Athens had a true legislature, while Sparta did not
Explanation:
One way that Athens was more democratic than Sparta was that Athens had a true legislature, while Sparta did not.
Athens had a legislative government while Sparta did not, as they were ruled by a council of elders.
Therefore, this was one way Athens was more democratic than Sparta.
What are the water features of Mexico City?
Answer:
Earlier this summer, Mexico City’s Water System (SACMEX) inaugurated a network of 230 drinking fountains installed in public spaces across the city. The fountains are part of the city’s initiative to curb reliance on bottled water. (Mexicans consume more bottled water per person than any other country in the world).
The sites for the fountains were selected taking local water quality into account. An interactive website enables residents and visitors alike to find the locations of the fountains, and offers up-to-date information about the water quality parameters.
PLZZZZZZ HELPPPPPPPP
All of the following were results of the Missouri Compromise except that Question 5 options:
1. Missouri entered the Union as a slave state
2. Sectionalism was significantly reduced.
3. political balance between the North and South was kept even
4. Maine entered the Union as a free state
Answer:
The answer is 2 sectionalism was significantly reduced
Explanation:
I took the test
what year was the first world war?
Answer:
1918
Explanation:
I THINK ITS HELP GOOD LUCK
Answer:
from 1914 to 1918________________PLEASE FOLLOW MEWhat is one thing that both the Zulu and Judeo-Christian origin stories have in common?
How did availability of books in the Abbasid Caliphate compare to the the availability of books in Western Europe from the 700s to the 1300s
During the 700s to the 1300s, the availability of books in the Abbasid Caliphate was much greater than the availability of books in Western Europe.
The Abbasid Caliphate was the third caliphate in Islam, following the death of the Prophet Muhammad. This caliphate was founded by Abu al-Abbas in 750. This was a crucial period for the Islamic world. The Islamic Golden Age occurred during the Abbasid Caliphate, which was known for its remarkable advancements in literature, art, science, and technology. The House of Wisdom, which was a primary intellectual center during the Abbasid Caliphate, played a significant role in promoting scholarship.
The Abbasid Caliphate was responsible for bringing knowledge to the world. Western Europe was characterized by the Middle Ages, also known as the medieval period. During this period, the availability of books was relatively limited. Since very few people were literate, books were considered to be a luxury item. There were no printing presses available, so all books had to be produced by hand. Because of the scarcity of resources, books were not available to the general public. Only the wealthy and privileged individuals had access to books.
Learn more about Abbasid Caliphate
https://brainly.com/question/30417202
#SPJ11
Why is the Neolithic period called a “revolution”
A. Continuing wars brought widespread destruction.
B. major changes occurred in social, political,and economic life.
C. strong leaders created city-states that grew into a vast empires.
D. New world religions arose,developed,and spread rapidly.
Answer:D
Explanation: apex
Why is the Neolithic period called a “revolution”?
A.Continuing wars brought widespread destruction.
B.Major changes occurred in social, political, and economic life.
C.Strong leaders created city-states that grew into vast empires.
D.New world religions arose, developed, and spread rapidly. <----------- this one
Which characteristics best describe Aaron Douglass's painting, Song of the
Towers?
• A. Still and peaceful
O B. Exaggerated and humorous
• C. Realistic and detailed
D. Abstract and geometric
a country can't be " sovereign " unless it controls its territory ( true or false)
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Sovereignty basically means supreme power or authority. A country can be called Sovereign if the country, has one centralized government that has the power to govern a specific area. If a country can't control its territory, It can't be Sovereign.
Mark me as Brainliest, if this answer helped
How did F. W. de Klerk influence change in South Africa? a. He was a black African who worked to repeal the apartheid laws. b.He was an Afrikaner who worked with Nelson Mandela to repeal apartheid laws. c.He was an Afrikaner who sent Nelson Mandela to prison for protesting apartheid. d.He was a black African who supported apartheid and worked to keep apartheid laws.
Answer: b
De Klerk is best known for his role in negotiating an end to apartheid and establishing a new constitution for the country. In 1990, he ordered the release of Nelson Mandela from prison, where he had been serving a life sentence for his role in opposing apartheid. De Klerk and Mandela worked closely together to negotiate an end to apartheid and establish a new, democratic government for South Africa.
Why did welfare capitalism emerge in the 1920s?
Mitrr ko Pareeksha meme Pratham Stan pane ke Liye Badai -patrr likiye Hello everyone this subject is hindi ok there was no hondi to choose as a subject thats why i choosed history
Answer:
yolo
Explanation:
During their senatorial campaign debates, Stephen A. Douglas depicted Abraham Lincoln as ________
During their senatorial campaign debates, Stephen A. Douglas depicted Abraham Lincoln as an abolitionist and radical who aimed to promote racial equality.
During the senatorial campaign debates between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas portrayed Abraham Lincoln as an abolitionist and radical figure. Douglas attempted to depict Lincoln as someone who aimed to promote racial equality and challenge the existing social order.
Douglas, a supporter of popular sovereignty and known for his advocacy of allowing territories to decide on the issue of slavery, used this stance to contrast himself with Lincoln. He sought to portray Lincoln's views on slavery as extreme and dangerous, highlighting Lincoln's opposition to the expansion of slavery and his commitment to preventing its further spread.
By presenting Lincoln as an abolitionist and radical, Douglas likely intended to appeal to voters who were wary of significant social change and upheaval. Douglas positioned himself as a more moderate alternative, advocating for compromise and emphasizing the preservation of the Union.
This portrayal of Lincoln by Stephen A. Douglas during their senatorial campaign debates reflects the political strategies employed by both candidates to sway public opinion and shape the narrative surrounding the issue of slavery during a critical period in American history.
Learn more about abolitionist here: https://brainly.com/question/11489694
#SPJ11
Qué hizo Jaime Torres Bodet cuando fue Secretario de Educación?
Answer:
Fue Secretario de Educación Pública entre 1943 y 1946, promovió la Campaña Nacional contra el Analfabetismo, creó el Instituto de Capacitación del Magisterio, organizó la Comisión Revisora de Planes y Programas, inició la Biblioteca Enciclopédica Popular, dirigió el valioso compendio México y la cultura
4. What do you think about those changes and/or their effects? Were they good?
Bad? Irrelevant?
Answer:
My thoughts about the changes that were made with regard the slaves are that they were good changes.This is because, the former slaves were now being paid for work done and were treated like decent humans, even though the price for freedom was steep as it led to the American Civil War.
Explanation:
1. How does the size of the English population in 1600 compare to the size of the English population today?
Answer:
The size of the English population in 1600, compared to today, is much smaller.
Explanation:
Population growth, medicine, advances in technology
What were the two main reasons workers formed unions?
as a form of social protest and to protect themselves from poor work conditions
for a social group and to protect themselves from poor work conditions
for a social group and to strike if they didn’t get what they wanted
as a form of social protest and to strike if they didn’t get what they wanted
Workers formed unions as a form of social protest and to protect themselves from poor work conditions.
Workers formed unions for two main reasons: as a form of social protest and to strike if they didn't get what they wanted.
Social Protest: Workers formed unions as a means of expressing collective discontent and advocating for better working conditions, fair wages, and improved treatment by employers.Poor Work Conditions: Many workers faced harsh and unsafe working conditions during the early stages of industrialization. Unions provided a platform for workers to unite and demand safer workplaces, reasonable hours, and improved benefits.Collective Bargaining Power: By organizing into unions, workers gained collective bargaining power. This enabled them to negotiate with employers from a position of strength, demanding improved wages, benefits, and working conditions as a unified group.Strike Action: Unions often resorted to strikes when negotiations failed or when employers refused to address their demands. Strikes were a means for workers to withhold their labor as a form of protest and exert pressure on employers to meet their demands.Through strikes, workers aimed to disrupt production and draw attention to their grievances, putting pressure on employers to negotiate and address their concerns.Ultimately, the formation of unions and the willingness to strike provided workers with a means to collectively challenge the existing power dynamics and fight for their rights and better working conditions.
For more such question on social protest
https://brainly.com/question/26439172
#SPJ8