The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as more units of a good are consumed, the marginal utility from the consumption of the next unit becomes lesser. This statement is true of the law of diminishing marginal utility.
he Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility states that if a single product or service is consumed in large quantities, the utility or satisfaction derived from each extra unit consumed eventually falls. As a result, the marginal utility of consumption decreases. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility is one of the most critical principles of microeconomics. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility applies to both goods and services.
The concept may be extended to the economic concepts of demand and budgeting, as well as other aspects of microeconomics. The law of diminishing marginal utility also asserts that people are inclined to choose the goods and services that provide them with the greatest amount of satisfaction or utility. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility, for example, can be used to explain why individuals may choose to buy several types of goods, even if the marginal utility of consuming these goods is low.
For more such questions on law of diminishing marginal utility
https://brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ11
A person who is abusing drugs...
A. avoids dangerous situations.
B. is alert to dangerous situations.
C. may put themselves in dangerous situations.
Answer:
C. May put themselves in dangerous situations
Explanation:
People who abuse drugs lack the ability to think clearly and therefore may not have a clear understanding of what is considered safe or dangerous in day-to-day situations.
When turning you should give the proper signal
Evaluate how community respond to women and children in light of the human Rights Violations
Answer:
Human rights violations against women and children are unfortunately prevalent in many communities around the world. The response of the community can vary depending on a range of factors, such as cultural norms, legal protections, and social attitudes.
In some cases, communities may rally together to support women and children who have experienced human rights violations. This may involve setting up support networks, providing counseling services, or advocating for legal and policy changes to prevent future abuses. Such responses can be vital in ensuring that survivors of human rights violations are able to access the resources and support to recover and manage their lives.
In other cases, communities may stigmatize and ostracize women and children who have experienced human rights violations. They may blame them for their own victimization and perpetuating harmful cultural attitudes that contribute to ongoing abuse. This can make it difficult for survivors to come forward and seek help and can further entrench cycles of violence and exploitation.
Ultimately, the response of the community to human rights violations against women and children depends on a complex interplay of factors.The main factors include cultural, social, and economic conditions, as well as legal and policy frameworks. To promote ethical practices and prevent human rights violations, communities should work together to address the root causes of such abuses. They should create a culture of respect and dignity for all individuals regardless of their gender or age.
Explanation:
Larry is told by Moe that Curly stole his prized business law book from his car. The next day Larry confronts Curly and slaps him repeatedly for stealing his book. Curly had Larry arrested for slapping him. Larry sues Curly for damages in the amount of the book and for maliciously having him arrested. Claiming that he lied, Curly sues Moe for defamation. The lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book involves which of the following?
a. Public law.
b. Private law.
c. Administrative law.
d. Both public and private law.
Answer:
i think its D
Explanation:
Both public and private law as the lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book. Hence, option D is correct.
What is lawsuit?A lawsuit is a civil legal proceeding in which one party files a claim against another the defendant, and the court makes the final decision.
Depending on the remedy sought and the jurisdiction where the plaintiff filed the complaint, a lawsuit filed in court to seek relief from or a remedy for a claimed injury may be tried by a court of law or a court of equity.
A lawsuit typically involves issues like breach of contract, financial difficulties, bodily harm, or property damage. The purpose of a lawsuit is for the plaintiff to demand that the defendant make amends for the wrongdoing or pay damages.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about lawsuit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15028192
#SPJ2
The President nominates a judge to a federal court but the Senate does not confirm (approve) the appointment. This act serves as a check on which TWO branches of government? (CHOOSE TWO)
Answer:
Executive and Legislative (or vise versa)
Explanation:
Executive is the President. Executive enforces the laws. The President also appoints judges.
The Legislative such as The Senate and House of Representatives make the laws.
Therefore, This would be a check on these two branches of Government.
adler argued that female delinquency would be affected by:
Adler argued that female delinquency would be affected by the changing role of women.
Sisters in Crime came out at the same time as the women's liberation movement. Sisters in Crime's main thesis, which was influenced by the social and political climate of the period, was that when women transitioned from the private to the public realm, they became more combative and competitive.
Adler proposed that when women gained their freedom, they would have access to both new legitimate and new illicit options. In other words, Adler believed that male and female criminals had the same motivations for committing crimes. Not the disparities between women and men but rather their varying levels of access to criminal chances account for gender inequalities in levels and patterns of crime.
Learn more about female delinquency here:
https://brainly.com/question/8129413
#SPJ4
Your question seems to be incomplete, but most probably the complete question was:
Freda Adler argued that female delinquency would be affected by_______.
What is the environmental impact assessment act, and its
benefits? (please answer in a detailed non- plagiarized answer
)
The Environmental Impact Assessment Act evaluates and manages the environmental impacts of proposed projects, promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.
A framework for assessing and managing the potential environmental effects of proposed projects or activities is established by the Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Its main advantages include promoting sustainable development by taking into account social, economic and environmental factors, protecting the environment by identifying and mitigating negative effects and facilitating public participation in decision making processes.
The act promotes project enhancements and modifications, ensures adherence to environmental regulations and provides comprehensive information on environmental impacts to enable informed decision making. The EIA Act promotes more environmentally conscious and sustainable development, ecosystem protection and a balance between development and conservation by incorporating environmental factors into project planning.
Learn more about Environmental Impact Assessment Act. at:
brainly.com/question/33015812
#SPJ4
What factors help explain why the police solve so "few" crimes?
Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation:
Some crimes are quite complicated in structure to solve as they leave little evidence to enable the police to capitalize on and solve.
Police response is also reactive which means that they cannot prevent crime per say, they can only try to solve it. This puts them at a disadvantage because they are essentially a step behind the criminals which means they have to do more to catch up than the criminal has to do to escape.
Police powers are also quite limited especially in a democratic nation like the United States because they have to abide by certain rules. For instance, if a search and seizure is illegal, regardless of if incriminating evidence is found, the criminal has a good chance of being freed. These rules make solving crimes difficult sometimes because some crimes cannot be solved conventionally.
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.
When light felonies are punishable? discuss
Answer:
Light felonies are punishable only when they have been consummated, with the exception of those committed against person or property.
_can be used to assess_
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
Nala is writing a report on criminal organizations found close to her home country. In her research, she finds that there is a movement of ordinary fishermen who are trying
to fight back against these criminals. They are pooling their funds to try to purchase police boats to be able to pursue the criminals. What criminal organization is Nala MOST
likely reporting about?
A. Latin american drug cartels
b. Italian mafia
c. Japanese yakusa
d. Somali pirates
WILL GIVE BRAINLEST
The criminal organization is Nala most likely reporting about Somali pirates therefore, option (D) is correct.
What is research?The term research is a systematic collection of data been there by researching a given data, we can make a progress report from it and make a description of the information in it by research we can to research a particular data on it by the research we can make the proper information to it. The purpose of research is to inform action. Thus, your study should seek to contextualize its findings within the larger body of research
As the Nala is writing the reports on the Somali pirates as see them, they have decided to write a proper report on them as they see the pirates are trying to fight back against it. As they are close to their home country, it's easy for the Nala to write a report on them.
Therefore, option (D) is correct.
Learn more about the research here:
https://brainly.com/question/28424344
#SPJ2
Which action is an example of an "implied" power? (Congress) A- Congress votes to raise income taxes B- Congress holds an investigation on women in the military C- Congress declares war on a country for sponsoring terroisim D- Congress decides to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
An implied power can be described as those powers which does not exist in the Constitution of the United States but expressly stated due to similar powers enjoyed by the Congress.
When the framers of the Constitution were drafting the document they had in mind that the needs of people will grow with the growing nation, so in Article I they gave the Congress right to excercise the power under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause.'
So, an example of implied power from the given options would be D. Congress have right to use implied power to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays. Therefore, option D is correct.
When a corporation takes complete ownership of a property, it is considered to be ownership in
tenancy in common.
joint tenancy.
partnership.
severalty.
T/F: The syllabus clearly states that class rules will never change under any conditions.
False. The syllabus clearly states that class rules may be modified or amended from time to time as deemed appropriate by the instructor.
The instructor reserves the right to make changes to the syllabus and class rules whenever deemed necessary. This may be done in order to keep up with changes in the subject matter, or in the case of a disruptive student, the instructor may decide to modify the class rules to ensure that all students have a safe learning environment.
Furthermore, the instructor may change class rules in response to feedback from students. It is important to remember that the instructor is the final authority on all decisions regarding the syllabus and class rules. Therefore, while the syllabus may initially state that the class rules are not subject to change, this is not a guarantee that they will never be changed.
Know more about instructor here
https://brainly.com/question/14450776#
#SPJ11
Ideas about what makes a successful police force have changed throughout US history. For
this activity, you will reflect on the early police force during the colonial era, as well as what
you know about the modern police force.
Create two job descriptions: one for a watchmen in colonial America and one for a modern-
day police officer in your home town. Each job description should contain the following
components:
In the political, reform, and community eras of US history, a successful police force has influenced society. sophisticated technologies, new types of crime, and changing community interactions.
The period between 1840 and 1930 is known as the Political Era of American policing. In the middle to end of the 1800s, major cities established police forces. Urbanisation brought on by the Industrial Revolution coincided with the Political Era of police. Corruption and brutality characterised the Political Era of policing, and the Reform Era emerged as the solution. This new age was mostly pioneered by one police head, head August Vollmer.
Read more about US history at
https://brainly.com/question/28709508
#SPJ1
Can someone please explain what is the difference between a revocable and irrevocable trust and what is a probate process? Why do I need a trust?
Answer:
The difference between a revocable and irrevocable trust would be; A revocable living trust becomes irrevocable when the grantor dies because he's no longer available to make changes to it. But a revocable trust can be designed to break into separate irrevocable trusts at the time of the grantor's death for the benefit of children or other beneficiaries.
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
THE MONKEY'S PAW
ESCAPE ROOM code
Answer:
The the hek does that mean?
GIMME FERRET NAMES. It's gonna be either white or sable mask. And a boy. I like Bandit and Ghost but tell me what you guys think!
Answer:
I like the name Bandit
Explanation:
Mark me brainliest please
Is it illegal for a firefighter to leave a person in a fire, even though they can rescue them, just because of the bad past the person and the firefighter shared?
Alphabetical data cannot be stored true or false
your answer is true my friend
Which right is protected by the Fifth Amendment?
to bear arms
to trial by jury
against cruel and unusual punishment
against self-incrimination
Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury,
Which of the following is a sentence that a judge can impose on a defendant at
sentencing (only one correct answer)?
a) Declaratory
b) Expository
c) Probation
d) Thematic
e) Runaway
Answer: C - probation.
Explanation:
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
What was the final vote of the Supreme Court white v regester?
Which of these does not happen at an arraignment?
The judge will appoint a public defender for the defendant if they cannot afford an attorney.
The judge will review the circumstances of the alleged crime and make a determination of probable cause.
The judge will make a decision regarding bail.
The judge will make a final ruling on the case.
Answer:
The judge will make a final ruling on the case. An arraignment is the first hearing in a criminal court case, and the purpose of the hearing is to provide the accused with their charges and the opportunity to plead guilty or not guilty. At this stage, the judge will review the circumstances of the alleged crime and make a determin
ation of probable cause, make a decision regarding bail, and (if necessary) appoint a public defender for the defendant if they cannot afford an attorney. A final ruling on the case will not be made until a later hearing.
managing security operations
Answer:
thats not a question
Explanation:
supreme court chief justice taney (in the dred scott case) favored this position.
In the famous Dred Scott case, Chief Justice Taney favored the position that African Americans were not considered citizens under the Constitution and could not sue in federal court.
In the famous Dred Scott case, Chief Justice Taney favored the position that African Americans were not considered citizens under the Constitution and could not sue in federal court. Taney also argued that the Missouri Compromise, which had prohibited slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional. Taney's decision in the case was widely criticized, both at the time and in later years, for its perceived pro-slavery bias and its apparent attempt to resolve the issue of slavery in favor of Southern interests. The decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford ultimately helped to contribute to the outbreak of the American Civil War, as it heightened tensions between North and South and made compromise on the issue of slavery increasingly difficult to achieve. Despite this controversial ruling, Chief Justice Taney remained on the Supreme Court until his death in 1864 and is remembered as one of the most influential jurists in American history.
To know more about American Civil War visit: https://brainly.com/question/769992
#SPJ11
Which claim about the state of virginia formed the basis for the supreme court's decision in loving v. Virginia? brainly.
According to Virginia's opinion, inter-racial marriages are illegal in the state. According to the US Supreme Court, Virginia's law violated the 14th amendment and they were unable to maintain Loving for inter-racial marriage.
The Virginia legislation, according to the Court, was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. According to our Constitution, "the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed upon by the State," stated Chief Justice Earl Warren. Because the punishment was the same regardless of the offender's race, Virginia had maintained that its statute did not violate the Equal Protection Clause because it "equally burdened" both whites and non-whites. Interracial marriage is the topic of the case. Virginia has a statute against interracial unions. After getting married in DC, the couple moved back to Virginia to start a new life together. They were detained and tried for breaking the law in Virginia.
Learn more about Virginia's opinion here
https://brainly.com/question/12924385
#SPJ4