The following assertions regarding common law are untrue; common law evolves in part as a result of decisions made in court proceedings.
Common law is a corpus of unwritten rules that are founded on judicially established precedents. When there are no written principles of law or applicable statutes, common law is used to guide decision-making in exceptional situations. The British tradition that colonial North America adopted in the 17th and 18th centuries gave rise to the American common-law system. In addition to the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, India, and New Zealand also use common law.
A precedent, also referred to as stare decisis, is a body of prior judicial rulings that serve as the standard of comparison for current cases. There is no formal legal system that can be applied to a case at hand, therefore common law, also known as case law, relies on thorough records of previous instances and statutes.
Learn more about common law here
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ9
Rhonda breaks her arm while skateboarding. She tells her boss that she slipped and fell while working. What type of financial crime is she trying to commit?
A. identity theft
B. embezzlement
C. tax evasion
D. insurance fraud
Answer:
A. identity theft
Explanation:
A financial crime can be defined as any form of criminal activity perpetrated by an individual or illegitimate business organization for the purpose of acquiring illegal financial gains or benefits. These criminal activities have a negative impact on the growth and development of the economy.
Some examples of the most common form of financial crimes experienced around the world are money laundering, identity theft, corruption, and terrorist financing.
Hence, the various types of financial crimes include the following;
I. Embezzlement.
II. Money laundering.
III. Tax evasion.
IV. Insurance fraud.
V. Identity theft.
Identity theft can be defined as situation in which a person uses another person's details or personal informations without an express permission while engaging in an illegitimate activity. Also, identity theft is an act of deceit which involves a misrepresentation of an event, issue or situation.
In this scenario, Rhonda breaks her arm while skateboarding but she told her boss that she slipped and fell while working. Thus, the type of financial crime she is trying to commit is an identity theft.
Answer:
D. Insurance fraud
Explanation:
I promise this is the answer I just took the test.
Insurance fraud: Insurance fraud occurs when someone reports a fake car accident, fire, or injury. They then file a claim to collect the insurance money. Insurance fraud includes overstated claims as well. This happens when a reported event did occur, but the individual tries to get a larger amount by overstating the damage.
Crime is a straightforward, easy topic to research and study.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Crime can differ from place to place. A crime in one location may not be a crime in another. On top of that, the reasoning behind committing a crime must be looked upon, and is not the same every single time. On top of that, the law can change, and so crime is ever changing. Remember, crime is breaking the law. If there is no law, then there is no crime.
Answer:
well if its a true or false question it would be false
what is the maximum sentence for involuntary manslaughter?
Involuntary manslaughter is a criminal offense that is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and/or a fine.The exact sentence depends on the severity of the crime and state laws.
In some cases, the judge may decide to apply a harsher sentence due to the circumstances of the crime. For example, a judge may apply a higher sentence if the crime was motivated by hatred or if the victim was a minor. In cases where the offender has a criminal history, the sentence may be even more severe. In general, the maximum sentence for involuntary manslaughter is 10 years in prison.
To know more about the criminal history refer to the link brainly.com/question/29357672
#SPJ4
Question
Refer to the article “The Future of Money” in your Money, Money, Money magazine for a complete version of this text.
How does the author best support the point that there are advantages to using digital currency?
Drag the correct answer into the box.
by describing ways that it can be safer and easier to use than traditional money
by giving opinions about benefits of using cryptocurrency and problems with using cash and credit
by explaining that digital transactions are fastest because they are handled by computers
The author supports the point by giving opinions on the benefits of using cryptocurrencies and problems with using cash and credit.
What Is Digital Currency?
Digital currency is only available in digital form. It isn't a material object with a physical actuality, unlike plutocrat or other goods like gold or oil painting. By streamlining the current fiscal system, digital plutocrat can grease briskly and more affordable fiscal deals. It may also make it simpler for central banks to apply financial policy.
Cryptocurrencies, digital currencies issued by central banks, and stablecoins are exemplifications of different types of digital plutocrat.
The amicable asset transfer and implicit reduction in sale costs are some benefits of digital currencies.
Digital currencies have some downsides, including the fact that they can be unpredictable to trade and are vulnerable to hacking.
To learn more on Digital currency from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28963893
#SPJ1
the court never considers the adequacy of consideration. a) true. b) false.
The statement, "The court never considers the adequacy of consideration", is False.
Adequacy of consideration refers to the fairness or value of what each party gives in exchange for the other party's promise. In general, the court will not intervene in a contract dispute solely based on the adequacy of consideration as long as both parties have freely and voluntarily agreed to the terms of the contract.
However, in cases with evidence of fraud, duress, undue influence, or mistake, the court may consider the adequacy of consideration as part of its analysis. Additionally, in certain contracts, such as contracts involving the sale of land, the court may require a higher standard of consideration to ensure fairness. In summary, while the court generally does not focus on the adequacy of consideration, there are situations where it may be taken into account.
To learn more about the adequacy of consideration, visit: https://brainly.com/question/17084026
#SPJ11
do you think that locard’s hypothesis is generally accurate
Yes, I do think that Locard’s hypothesis is generally accurate. This hypothesis has been the basis for criminal investigation for many years.
Locard's hypothesis, also known as Locard's Exchange Principle, states that "every contact leaves a trace." In other words, whenever two objects come into contact with each other, there will be an exchange of materials between them.
This principle is widely accepted in the field of forensic science and is used to link suspects to crime scenes and victims.
While there may be cases where the exchange of materials is not detectable, Locard's hypothesis is still considered to be generally accurate.
This is because the principle is based on the fact that it is nearly impossible for two objects to come into contact without leaving some sort of trace evidence. Whether it is a fingerprint, DNA, or fibers, there is almost always some sort of evidence left behind.
Overall, Locard's hypothesis is a valuable tool in forensic investigations and is generally considered to be accurate.
Another question about hypothesis in https://brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ11
What is the effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing? They take a huge financial hit, deterring them from repeating the crime. The fine they pay is much less than the profit they made from their crime. They must refund all the money they made from their crime. The fine is a penalty that causes most of them to go out of business
Option A: The effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing is that they suffer a severe financial loss, which discourages them from doing the offense again.
Companies that are found guilty of price fixing can face severe financial consequences as a result of fines, which can act as a strong deterrence to such offenses in the future.
Depending on the seriousness of the offense and the size of the organization implicated, these fines may reach millions or even billions of dollars. The notion is that the fine must be severe enough to deter the corporation from repeating the same anticompetitive behavior.
The objective is to deter the corporation from participating in unlawful acts that hurt customers and other businesses rather than forcing them out of business.
Learn more about price fixing at
https://brainly.com/question/13062335
#SPJ4
The question is -
What is the effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing?
a. They take a huge financial hit, deterring them from repeating the crime.
b. The fine they pay is much less than the profit they made from their crime.
c. They must refund all the money they made from their crime.
d. The fine is a penalty that causes most of them to go out of business.
these are used to find information on the internet they include key words side bars hyper link and serch enjins
Answer:
Search tools.
Explanation:
Boolean logic refers to a theory of mathematics developed by the prominent British mathematician, called George Boole. In Boolean logic, all variables are either true or false and are denoted by the number "1" or "0" respectively; True = 1 or False = 0.
Also, Boolean logic allow users to combine keywords with Boolean operators such as quotes, AND, OR, and near/n to give a more personalized and relevant search results.
In a database search, when you search for a topic online, and put quotes around a phrase so that you find the words in the exact order that you type them in, you are using a Boolean logic.
Search tools are used to find information on the internet. They include keywords, sidebars, hyperlinks, and search engines. Some examples of the most popular search engines are Go-ogle, Bing, and Yahoo.
Si tuvieras la oportunidad de crear una ley en contra del Racismo (sentimiento de superioridad de un grupo étnico que conlleva a discriminar a grupos distintos colocándolos en el nivel de inferiores). ¿Qué ley propondrías y cuáles serán sus principales características? (5 puntos)
Answer:
Si tuviese la oportunidad de crear una ley en contra del Racismo, propondría crear una normativa que sancione con penas graduales a quienes incurran en conductas discriminatorias. Así, crearía un registro público de delitos racistas, donde se registrarían los delitos cometidos por cada persona, la cual tendría cada vez mayores penas según vaya reincidiendo en sus conductas: pasando desde los trabajos comunitarios hasta las multas, las inhabilitaciones para determinadas actividades o incluso la prisión en ciertos casos de gravedad.
The first three articles of the U.S. Constitution
explain the powers delegated to the national government
list the powers implied as belonging to national government
explain the powers reserved to the state governments
list the powers concurrent to the state governments
The powers delegated (sometimes referred to as enumerated or expressed) powers are specifically granted to the national government in Article I, Section eight of the Constitution.
This embodies the ability to coin money, regulate commerce, declare war, raise and maintain armed forces, and establish a Post Office.Reserved powers are people who the Constitution saves for the states. reserved powers. coincident powers are those that the national and state governments share.Delegated powers to the national government include the power to control commerce, the power to keep up the armed forces, the power to coin money, and also the power to establish a post office. The national government's expressed powers permit it to levy taxes, coin money, to form war, lift a military and navy, and control interstate commerce. B. The inexplicit powers, within the elastic clause of the Constitution, are powers the national government needs to hold out the expressed powers.
Learn more about the national government here: https://brainly.com/question/25192887
#SPJ1
If you are making a left turn from a two way street into a one way street you must start the turn from the _____ abc hit may turn into any lane that is safely open
If you are turning left from a two-way street onto a one-way street, you should complete the turn into the left lane .
Once you have turned onto the one-way street, you may turn into any lane that is safely open and appropriate for your destination. It is important to check for other vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists before making the turn and to signal your intention to turn in advance.
If there is a center left turn lane, use it. turning left onto a two-way street from a one-way street. Starting in the far-left lane, make the turn. End the turn in the left lane closest to the middle of the street moving in the direction of your vehicle to lower the likelihood of a collision.
Learn more about two-way street
https://brainly.com/question/29424500
#SPJ4
what are factors presented that makes the witness reliable? in the case of tyrone briggs
Answer:
which organ is responsible in dealing with constitional disputes?
For the following question, spot the potential torts or crimes. Some actions may be more than one tort/crime. Explain why you believe each action to be a specific tort and/or crime and address whether or not the Defendant has any potential defenses. List the potential plaintiffs and what each plaintiff’s cause of action might be.
Dunder Mifflin is a paper company based in Scranton, Pennsylvania. Their office manager, Michael Scott, has a “unique” way of managing. The employees are a collective group of various personalities. Office conflicts arise on a daily basis.
One day at the office, Dwight decides to conduct a surprise fire drill. Unlike normal fire drills, Dwight decides to go “all out.” He locks all of the exists so his co-workers are trapped inside. Dwight then uses a blowtorch to heat the door handles to extreme temperatures. Lastly, Dwight starts a fire in the kitchen trashcan in order to set off the fire alarm.
Panic sets in and the employees all start trying to escape. Unfortunately, all of the exits are locked and the employees are trapped. Jim and Michael burn their hands on the door handles. Due to the fear of the situation, Stanley has a heart attack (don’t worry, he’ll survive). In an effort to begin CPR on Stanley, Michael knocks Angela over and she breaks her ankle. Several employees sustain minor injuries during the commotion of trying to escape.
Dwight eventually calms everyone down and informs them that this was just a drill and they all failed. Darryl was so angry that he punched Dwight in the face. All of the employees are irate with Dwight and report him to the corporate office. Toby informs the corporate office that Dwight is reckless and caused extreme panic in the office. Dwight is suspended without pay for 2 weeks.
When Dwight returns to work, the entire office is still angry with him, especially Jim. Jim decides to pull a series of pranks on Dwight to “get even.” One prank in particular made Dwight very angry. Jim moved Dwight’s desk into the bathroom.
Unfortunately, there was a toilet that always leaked. The employees reported this problem for several months but it had not been repaired. On the way to his desk, Dwight slipped and fell. Dwight ended up having a concussion and a sprained shoulder.
Michael noticed how hostile the office had gotten and decided that the office needed a team-building day to “come together.” The entire group went to the beach to play some volleyball and other beach activities. On the way home from the beach, the group was rear-ended by a delivery truck owned by Vance Refrigeration. Several of the employees suffered injuries due to the car accident.
Everyone heals from their injuries and returns to work. Dwight is no longer allowed to conduct safety drills and all pranks have been prohibited. It’s a pretty boring office environment now.
The first plaintiffs can be the office employees like Michael, Jim, Stanley and Angela who suffered a lot because of Dwight . The second plaintiff can be Dwight who suffered in response of his prank.
Due to the fire drill prank, Michael and Jim had burnt their hands as the door handles of exit doors were heated to their extreme temperatures by Dwight using a blowtorch.
Stanley, who had a heart attack due to the fear of the situation.
Angela, whose ankle was broken because of the panic created among the employees during the commotion of trying to escape.
The desk of Dwight was moved in the leaking bathroom by the frustrated co-employees due to which he fell down and had a sprained shoulder.
To know more about plaintiffs here
https://brainly.com/question/1065754
#SPJ1
Discuss Saudi judicial system that is followed by basic trial
procedures (in 300 to 500 words)
Saudi Arabia is an Islamic state, and its judicial system for both criminal and civil cases is based on Islamic law (Shari'ah). The King is at the apex of the legal system, serving as the final court of appeal and a source of pardon.
Saudi Arabia's legal system is based on Sharia, Islamic law based on the Qur'an and the Sunnah (traditions) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Sharia's sources also include Islamic scholarly consensus formed after Muhammad's death. Its interpretation by Saudi judges is influenced by the mediaeval texts for the literalist Hanbali school of Islamic law. Saudi Arabia is the only Muslim country that has adopted Sharia in its uncodified form. This, combined with a lack of judicial precedent, has created significant uncertainty about the scope and content of the country's laws.
Learn more about Saudi Arabia, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15174193
#SPJ4
Describe a time when you successfully argued a point of view and explain why you believe you were successful.
when I was not having my practice n.b and I explained my teacher but she didn't
then I call my mother and she told the same reason to her
What type of abuse that involves intimidating ridiculing or degrading someone is called?
The act of frightening, making fun of, or degrading another individual is bullying.
What is Bullying?Bullying is a form of maltreatment that involves intimidating, making fun of or demeaning another person.
Bullying is when someone is mistreated, violently dominated, or intimidated by the use of force, compulsion, harsh teasing, or threats.
The actions are frequently repeated and ingrained.
A necessary prerequisite is the perception of an imbalance of physical or social power, whether possessed by the bully or by others.
This imbalance is what distinguishes bullying from confrontation.
A hostile intent, an imbalance of power, and recurrence over time set bullying apart from other forms of aggressive behavior.
Bullying is the act of displaying aggressive conduct repeatedly with the intent to cause harm to another person's body, mind, or emotions.
Therefore, intimidating, poking fun at, or demeaning another person is bullying.
Know more about Bullying here:
https://brainly.com/question/25667896
#SPJ4
Audrey was granted stock appreciation rights in 10,000 shares of company stock when the share price was $50. If she exercised her rights when the share price was $70, how much income, if any, must she recognize at that time?
The income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Audrey will earn $200000 if she sells all the shares when the share price is $70 because there is $20 increase occur from the time when she receives the share until now. When she receives the share, its price is $50.
But after sometime when the share price increases and reaches up to $70 so we can conclude that the income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Learn more about shares here: https://brainly.com/question/1957305
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/26058343
justify the title of the poem?
the leader and the led
Answer:
The title of the poem The Leader and the Led by Niyi Osundare speaks to the various dimensions of attitude within the ambit of Leadership.
It speaks to the indivisible union between leadership and followership.
In the first line, he opens up the poem by describing the attribute of the Leader as a lion who is unafraid to stake his claim. He contrasts that with the Antelope who is always fearful and reminded of the paws of the Lion.
It speaks therefore to the requirement of the Leader to be strong when he or she has to be. It also indicates that the leader cannot always be nice.
By an Ironic statement in line 9, he points out the reason why a duplicitous person cannot lead. He likens such a person to a Zebra. Duplicity equals the inability to inspire trust. Trust is an essential and critical quality for a leader. In line 10 he communicates that the followers are not as powerless as they have been painted to be in line 6 as fearful Impalas, for they also have the ability to finger the flaws of a leader to limelight and remove their following from he or she.
Lines 19 and 20 suffices in the description of a balanced leader as one who must be firm when it is required and gentle when the occasion calls for it.
The entire imagery painted by the poem is a fine depiction of leadership using metaphorical analogies of the animal kingdom.
For as in the animal kingdom, animals have leadership and following, so also do humans.
why did my dad hasn't come back with the milk?
Answer:
he couldnt find it
Explanation:
he got lost at the grocery store
Answer:
sorry to break the new like this, but if he wanted to come back, he would've
Explanation:
heeyy but uhm don't lose hope :D
u never know maybe he'll comeback one of these days
have a great day!
In 2000, Ann and Carlos met at university. In 2004 they married. They immediately bought, and began running in partnership, a hotel. In 2010 they incorporated Hotelux Ltd, to take over the business of running the hotel. Ann and Carlos each owned 50 per cent of the company’s shares and were the company’s only directors. They agreed they would share equally the running of the company.
In 2018, the company needed to raise more finance to purchase another hotel. Ann’s accountant introduced her to Kambili, a venture capitalist who bought a 20 per cent shareholding in Hotelux (leaving Ann and Carlos each owning 40 per cent of the shares). Kambili was appointed a director but has never attended any board meetings. In 2019, it was agreed that Kambili’s son, Tayo, could work for Hotelux as a manager of one of its hotels.
In 2020, Ann and Carlos’s marriage broke down. Ann became very depressed and stopped attending board meetings. Carlos persuaded Kambili to join with him in voting for Ann’s removal as a director, and Carlos continued running the company alone. Under Carlos’s sole management, the company’s fortunes have declined considerably. Carlos recently made a number of
14
Hotelux’s employees redundant, including Tayo. Kambili complains that this goes against what the shareholders agreed in 2019. Carlos has offered to buy Ann’s and Kambili’s shares from them at a fair market price, to be determined by the company’s auditors.
Advise Ann, and Kambili, whether each of them could bring successful proceedings under section 994 Companies Act 2006.
Ann and Kambili may potentially bring successful proceedings under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 against Carlos.
Under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, Ann and Kambili may potentially bring successful proceedings against Carlos. Section 994 allows minority shareholders to seek relief from the court if the company's affairs are being conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to their interests.
In this case, several factors support Ann's claim. Firstly, Ann and Carlos initially agreed to share the running of the company equally, indicating an understanding of joint management. However, Carlos's decision to remove Ann as a director without legitimate cause and continue running the company alone could be viewed as unfairly prejudicial. Additionally, the decline in the company's fortunes under Carlos's sole management could be seen as further evidence of unfair treatment.
Regarding Kambili, the fact that he was appointed as a director but never attended board meetings raises questions about his involvement and the fulfillment of his responsibilities. If it can be established that his appointment was merely a formality and he was excluded from decision-making processes, it could be argued that his interests have been unfairly prejudiced.
Ultimately, the success of proceedings under section 994 would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence presented in court.
For more such question on Companies Act 2006
https://brainly.com/question/29065245
#SPJ8
how science prevail over common sense?
Answer:
The difference between common sense and science. Plainly stated common sense is information gathered from everyday knowledge and science is thorough research on a particular subject with concluded facts.
The reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it,
Basically, a common sense means a conventional intelligence that people gathered from everyday situations, events etc.
Science mean a knowledge about our world based on facts learned through numerous experiments, observation etc.
In conclusion, the reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it.
Read more about Science
brainly.com/question/17216882
Penalties for breach of confidentiality may include monetary fine, mandatory training in ferpa, or a restriction of data access for a period of up to how many years?.
Penalties for breach of confidentiality may include a monetary fine, mandatory training in ferpa, or a restriction of data access for a period of up to 3 years.
Local education groups and faculties may additionally launch facts from students schooling facts with the previous written consent of dad and mom, beneath limited situations exact by law, or as said in nearby businesses pupil statistics policies.
A breach of confidentiality, or violation of confidentiality, is the unauthorized disclosure of exclusive information. it could show up in writing, orally, or all through a casual assembly among the parties.
Breaches of confidentiality responsibilities may be a valid cause for dismissal, Penalties especially if the worker has been negligent or careless. even supposing the dismissal isn't procedurally honest, dismissals for breaches of confidentiality may be upheld as legitimate in the conduct is serious enough
Learn more about Penalties here:-https://brainly.com/question/1178265
#SPJ4
rollo deeds a plot of timberland to scholars university as a gift. the university pays nothing for the property. rollo has given the university
Role has given the University free sample absolute. The correct option is A.
Scholars University has received a "free sample absolute" of the Timberland plot from Rollo. In this instance, Rollo gave the university ownership of the property without asking for anything in return. A gift or donation that fully and unconditionally transfers ownership of the property to the recipient without any conditions or restrictions is referred to as "free sample absolute."
Scholars University now has the legal right to use all the Timberland's rights and privileges as the property's owner. This kind of transfer is distinguished by the gift's voluntary nature; Rollo chose to give the property to the university devoid of any obligation under the law or exchange of value.
Learn more about ownership at:
brainly.com/question/31889760
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Rollo deeds a plot of Timberland to scholars university as a gift. The University pays nothing for the property. Role has given the University
A) free sample absolute
B) A license
C) and easement
D) The power of eminent domain"
Five challenges which new entrepruneur entering the job market could incounter
Marco is charged with kidnapping a young girl and carrying her across state lines. Marco is convicted of kidnapping and he wants to appeal.
Answer: Um sorry for wasting your answeres but whats the question.
Explanation:
a state attorney general may recover up to how much in damages (civil penalties) resulting from sherman act violations?
in which case did the supreme court rule that state governments no longer had the authority to make private sexual behavior a crime? webster v. reproductive health services gonzales v. oregon lawrence v. texas bowers v. hardwick texas v. johnson
Option-C: The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that state governments no longer had the authority to make private sexual behavior a crime in the case of Lawrence v. Texas.
This ruling overturned the previous decision made in the case of Bowers v. Hardwick. Lawrence v. Texas was a case that was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States in 2003. It involved the constitutionality of a Texas law that criminalized certain sexual acts between people of the same sex.The two men involved in the case were arrested and charged with violating the Texas law. They challenged the constitutionality of the law, arguing that it violated their right to privacy and their right to equal protection under the law.
The Supreme Court ultimately agreed, ruling that the Texas law was unconstitutional. In doing so, the Court overturned its earlier decision in the case of Bowers v. Hardwick, which had upheld a similar law in Georgia.The ruling in Lawrence v. Texas had significant implications for the rights of LGBTQ individuals in the United States. It helped pave the way for subsequent court decisions that expanded legal protections for LGBTQ people, including the landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.Thus the correct answer is option-C:Lawrence v. Texas.
For such more questions on Lawrence v. Texas:
brainly.com/question/29609912
#SPJ11
What is the minimum age for anyone to be on the premises of a class ag (bar) permit at any time?
The minimum age for anyone to be on the premises of a Class A or Class G (bar) permit at any time is 21 years.
In many countries, the legal drinking age is 21, and this age restriction applies to entering the premises of establishments with Class A or Class G permits, commonly referred to as bars.
The legal drinking age varies by country, and in some cases, even within different regions of a country. However, for the purpose of this explanation, I will provide information based on the legal drinking age in the United States, as it is one of the most well-known examples.
In the United States, the legal drinking age is 21 years old. This means that individuals must be at least 21 years old to purchase, possess, or consume alcoholic beverages. Additionally, this age restriction also applies to entering the premises of establishments with Class A or Class G permits, which are typically bars or establishments where alcohol is served.
Class A permits are typically issued to establishments that primarily serve alcoholic beverages, while Class G permits are issued to businesses that serve alcohol, but it is not their primary focus. Regardless of the class of the permit, the minimum age requirement remains the same.
It is important to note that the legal drinking age and age restrictions for entering bars or establishments serving alcohol may vary in different countries or regions. Therefore, it is always advisable to consult the specific laws and regulations of the particular jurisdiction in question to obtain accurate and up-to-date information on age restrictions for entering bar premises.
To learn more about permit click here: brainly.com/question/32091205
#SPJ11
Larry, Moe, and Curly own the Three Stooges as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. Curly conveys his interest to Shemp. Subsequently, Moe dies. Who owns Moe's interest in the Three Stooges?
Answer:
Larry, Moe and Curly own an investment property as tenants in common. Because of a recent business disagreement, Curly wants to divest himself of the property. If the three owners cannot mutually agree on a plan to settle the matter, Curly may seek an equitable distribution of the property
All three own Moe's interest in the Three Stooges as all of them were the tenants.
This is due to the fact that a business with a survivorship right legally goes to the person who survives. As a result, the property cannot be considered part of both the estate of the dead owner under the law.
Joint property owners have the right of succession, which guarantees that, in the event of one owner's passing, the surviving owner(s) will take over ownership of the deceased owner's part of the property.
As renters in common, Curly, Moe, and Larry jointly own a rental. Cindy wishes to sell property due to a recent economic quarrel. Curly may ask for a fair division of the land if the three owners are unable to come to an arrangement. The Three Stooges are owned by Larry, Moe, and Curly as equal partners with right of survivorship.
Learn more about the rights of survivorship, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/14140061
#SPJ5
Which of the following is an obligation of creditors in the debtor-creditor relationship?
A. To communicate when payment can't be met
B. To pay the loan in full and on time
C. To disclose hidden fees and charges
D. To make threats to collect payment
Answer: A. To communicate when payment can't be met.
Explanation: The creditor has the right to collect payment on amounts that are due. If the debtor defaults on the debt then the creditor has several options: Attempt to collect the debt from the debtor. Attempt to collect collateral from the debtor or guarantor.