Which of the following is true?
Group of answer choices
(LF – LS) > (EF – ES)
Slack = (LF – LS)
(LS – ES) >= 0

Answer:

The next number in the sequence is 17/15.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3.25 or abot 4

Step-by-step explanation:

divde

Using division, the given color printer will take 0.31 minutes per page.

Division is separating a group of items into an equal number of smaller groups. It is splitting into equal parts or groups. we use ÷ symbol or the / symbol to mean divide.

Given, a color printer prints 13 pages in 4 minutes.

To calculate the time taken by the printer to print a single page, we need to divide the total time taken by the printer to the total pages printed in that particular time.

Therefore, to print a page, it will take \(\frac{4}{13}\) minutes = \(0.31\) minutes.

Learn more about division here

https://brainly.com/question/22056199

#SPJ2

Answer:

A - 7

Step-by-step explanation:

These angles are corresponding, meaning they are congruent. Therefore it is simple algebra.

16x - 7 = 105

16x = 112

112/16 = 7

x=7

(x³+y³)(x³-y³) is the complete factorisation of the given expression

Given the expression below as  x^9-y^9. We need to completely factorize the given expression as shown:

x^9-y^9 = (x³)²  - (y³)²

According to the difference of two square:

a²-b² = (a+b)(a-b)

Applying this rule in question;

x^9-y^9 = (x³)²  - (y³)²

x^9-y^9 = (x³+y³)(x³-y³).

Hence the complete factorisation of the expression is (x³+y³)(x³-y³).

Learn more on Factorization here: https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ1

WRONG QUIZES ARE HARDER THEN THE ACTUALLY TEST

JUST SAYIN G

Answer:

what exacually is the question

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 18

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

We have that Jim is 6.1 ft tall, and his shadow is 12.4 ft long. If they ask for the shadow of the flagpole having into account that it is 22.4 ft tall, we can solve the problem with a three rule. We have the following relation: height (ft): object/person shadow 6.1 12.4 22.4 x Then we have the equation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$50.40

Step-by-step explanation:

To find how much Lana will pay in total follow these steps.

First, multiply 40 by 1.05.

40×1.05=42.

This is how much she will pay for the food plus tax.

Now, multiply 42 by 1.2.

42×1.2=50.40

This is how much she will pay for the food, tax, and tip.

Lana will pay a total of $50.40.

Hope this helps!

The range of value of x in the inequality x/7 ≥ -6 is x≥ -42

Inequality, is a statement of an order relationship. Some terms used in inequality are ,greater than, greater than or equal to, less than, or less than or equal to. They are used between two numbers or algebraic expressions.

greater than has the sign >

greater than or equal to has the sign ≥

less than has the sign < and

less than or equal to has ≤

solving the range of value of x in the inequality x/7 ≥- 6

multiply both sides by 7

x ≥ -42

Therefore the range of value of x is x ≥ -42

learn more about inequality from

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1

To find the length of a rectangular computer chip, we can use the formula for the area of a rectangle, which is A = l × w, where A is the area, l is the length, and w is the width. We can rearrange the formula to solve for the length, l, by dividing both sides of the equation by the width, w: l = A / w.

Given that the area of the computer chip is 112a3b2 square microns and the width is 8ab microns, we can plug these values into the formula for the length and simplify:

l = A / w
l = 112a3b2 / 8ab
l = (112 / 8) × (a3 / a) × (b2 / b)
l = 14 × a2 × b
l = 14a2b

Therefore, the simplified expression for the length of the computer chip is 14a2b microns.

Learn more about length of the computer chip here https://brainly.com/question/22407649

#SPJ11

Henry had deposited approximately $8,000.32 if he received $13,299.23 after 5 years. Rounded to the nearest dollar, the answer is $8,000.To solve this problem, we can use the formula for compound interest:

\($$ A = P \left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt} $$\)

where A is the amount after t years, P is the principal (the amount deposited), r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

In this case, we have:

A = $13,299.23

r = 0.08 (8%)

n = 4 (quarterly compounding)

t = 5 years

We can rearrange the formula to solve for P:

\(P = \frac{A}{(1 + \frac{r}{n})^(nt) }\)

Plugging in the values, we get:

\(P = \frac{ $13,299.23}{(1 + \frac{0.08}{4} ) ^ {(4*5)} }\)

P ≈ $8,000.32

Therefore, Henry had deposited approximately $8,000.32 if he received $13,299.23 after 5 years. Rounded to the nearest dollar, the answer is $8,000.

To know more about deposits

brainly.com/question/15841366

#SPJ4

The greatest number of wristbands that can be made from a rectangular piece of paper that measures 18 centimeters by 85 centimeters is 36.

To calculate the greatest number of wristbands that can be made from a rectangular piece of paper that measures 18 centimeters by 85 centimeters, we need to divide the width of the paper by the width of each wristband, and then divide the length of the paper by the length of each wristband, and then multiply the two numbers together. The result will be the greatest number of wristbands that can be made from the paper.

Using the dimensions given in the question, and assuming that each wristband measures 1.5 centimeters by 22 centimeters (which is a typical size for a wristband), we can calculate the number of wristbands as follows:

Width of paper = 18 centimeters

Width of each wristband = 1.5 centimeters

Number of wristbands in width = (18 / 1.5) = 12

Length of paper = 85 centimeters

Length of each wristband = 22 centimeters

Number of wristbands in length = (85 / 22) ≈ 3.86 (round down to 3)

Total number of wristbands = (12 x 3) = 36

Therefore, the greatest number of wristbands that can be made from a rectangular piece of paper that measures 18 centimeters by 85 centimeters is 36.

To know more about greatest number: https://brainly.com/question/29292243

#SPJ11

The expression states that for every linear polynomial p with real coefficients and a nonzero coefficient of x, there is exactly one real root r.

For all linear polynomials with real coefficients and a nonzero coefficient of x, there exists exactly one real root. This can be expressed using the universal quantifier "for all" and the existential quantifier "there exists", connected by the logical connective "and". Additionally, the statement "exactly one real root" can be expressed using the quantifier "there exists" and the logical connective "and".

Using quantifiers and logical connectives, we can express the given fact as follows:

∀p ∃!r ((isLinearPolynomial(p) ∧ hasRealCoefficients(p) ∧ coefficientOfX(p) ≠ 0) → hasRealRoot(p, r))

Explanation:

- ∀p: For every polynomial p
- ∃!r: There exists exactly one real root r
- isLinearPolynomial(p): p is a linear polynomial (degree 1)
- hasRealCoefficients(p): p has real coefficients
- coefficientOfX(p) ≠ 0: The coefficient of x in p is nonzero
- hasRealRoot(p, r): p has a real root r

Learn more about coefficients at: brainly.com/question/1594145

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

\( = { ({16}^{ \frac{3}{2} } )}^{ \frac{1}{2} } \)

\( = { ({( {2}^{4}) }^{ \frac{3}{2} } )}^{ \frac{1}{2} } \)

\( = {2}^{4 \times \frac{3}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} } \)

\( = {2}^{ \frac{12}{4} } \)

\( = {2}^{3} \)

\( = 2 \times 2 \times 2\)

\( = 8\)

The answer is B.

If two methods agree perfectly in a method comparison study, the slope equals 1.0 and the y-intercept equals 0.0. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.

In a method comparison study, the goal is to compare the agreement between two different measurement methods or instruments. The relationship between the measurements obtained from the two methods can be described by a linear equation of the form y = mx + b, where y represents the measurements from one method, x represents the measurements from the other method, m represents the slope, and b represents the y-intercept.

When the two methods agree perfectly, it means that there is a one-to-one relationship between the measurements obtained from each method. In other words, for every x value, the corresponding y value is the same. This indicates that the slope of the line connecting the measurements is 1.0, reflecting a direct proportional relationship.

Additionally, when the two methods agree perfectly, there is no systematic difference or offset between the measurements. This means that the line connecting the measurements intersects the y-axis at 0.0, indicating that the y-intercept is 0.0.

Therefore, in a perfect agreement scenario, the slope equals 1.0 and the y-intercept equals 0.0, which corresponds to option (b).

Learn more about y-intercept here:

https://brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ11

Approximately 11.21% of the racers did not complete the marathon.

To find the percentage of racers who did not complete the marathon, we need to calculate the ratio of the number of racers who did not complete (gave up or were disqualified) to the total number of racers who started the marathon.

The number of racers who did not complete the marathon is the sum of those who gave up and those who were disqualified, which is 29 + 8 = 37.

So, the percentage of racers who did not complete the marathon is given by:

(37 / 330) * 100

Calculating this expression:

(37 / 330) * 100 ≈ 11.21%

Therefore, approximately 11.21% of the racers did not complete the marathon.

To learn more about percentage visit:

brainly.com/question/32575737

#SPJ11

Answer:

\( = { \tt{ \frac{125}{5} }} \\ = { \bf{25 \: frames \: per \: second}}\)

Answer:

B. 25 frames per second

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the rate in frames per second, divide the total frames in 5 seconds by 5. This is because 5/5=1 and that way we're finding the frames per (one) second.

Therefore, we have:

\(\frac{125}{5}=\boxed{25\text{ frames per second}}\)

360/18= 20

so the answer is 20 degrees

Answer:

20 degree

Step-by-step explanation:

Total angle for a circle is 360 degree, if divided into 18 part, then each part is 360 / 18 = 20 degree.

If it is helpful, plz give me Brainliest.

Answer:

60001 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

\(Total\ Distance = 180000\)

Let the cars be: \(Car\ A, Car\ B\ and\ Car\ C\)

Assume that Car A has the minimum mileage of x.

\(Car\ A = x\)

The other cars would be:

\(Car\ B = x + 1\)

\(Car\ C = x + 2\)

This implies that Car C has the highest mileage

Required

Determine the possible minimum number of miles

Since the total distance is 180000, then:

\(Car\ A + Car\ B + Car\ C = 180000\)

Substitute values for Car A, B and C

\(x + x + 1 + x + 2 = 180000\)

Collect Like Terms

\(x + x + x = 180000-1-2\)

\(3x = 179997\)

Divide both sides by 3

\(\frac{3x}{3} = \frac{179997}{3}\)

\(x = \frac{179997}{3}\)

\(x = 59999\)

The car with the most mileage is Car C

So:

\(Car\ C = x + 2\)

Substitute 59999 for x in \(Car\ C = x + 2\)

\(Car\ C = 59999 + 2\)

\(Car\ C = 60001\)

The minimum distance travelled by Car C is 60001 miles

 According to the given function the Vertex: (-1, 3),  Range: 3 ≤ y < ∞.

In mathematics, a function is a rule that assigns each element in one set, called the domain, to a unique element in another set, called the range. The elements in the domain are the input values, and the elements in the range are the output values.

the vertex and range of the function y = |x + 1| + 3, we need to remember that the absolute value function has a vertex at the point where the input (x) is 0, and the range of the function is always non-negative.

The function y = |x + 1| + 3 is a translation of the absolute value function y = |x| by one unit to the left and three units up. So, the vertex of the function y = |x + 1| + 3 is at the point (-1, 3).

The range of the function y = |x + 1| + 3 is all non-negative values, since the absolute value function always returns non-negative values.

 According to the given function the Vertex: (-1, 3),  Range: 3 ≤ y < ∞.

To know more about the function visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1

Answer:

(-17 + 9) - 15

Step-by-step explanation:

I think of below sa level as negative numbers, so 17 feet below sea level is -17. Then when he rises 9 feet that would be - 17 + 9. When he decends 15 feet to take another picture thats - 15. Then when you thing of pemdas addition goes first, so i just put parentases around -17 + 9 to get the expression (-17 + 9) - 15

Answer:

The answer is 5/9

Step-by-step explanation:

It is 5/9 because you have to do cross multiplication, 3 times 3 is 9 which will be the dominator and 5 times 1 which is 5 and the numerator.  Hope this helped please mark brainliest.

The one-sample z-statistic for evaluating the hypothesis that unvaccinated people get COVID-19 is not 0.03 is -85.7. This statistic tested the hypothesis that unvaccinated people do not get COVID-19 at 0.03%.

In order to compute the one-sample z-statistic, we must first do a comparison between the observed proportion of COVID-19 instances in the placebo group and the expected proportion of 0.03. (p - p0) / [(p0(1-p0)) / n is the formula for the one-sample z-statistic. In this formula, p represents the actual proportion, p0 represents the predicted proportion, and n represents the sample size.

The observed proportion of COVID-19 instances among those who received the placebo is 162/18325 less than 0.0088. According to the received wisdom, the proportion that should be anticipated is 0.03. The total number of people sampled is 18325. After entering these numbers into the formula, we receive the following results:

z = (0.0088 - 0.03) / √[(0.03(1-0.03)) / 18325] ≈ (-0.0212) / √[(0.0291) / 18325] ≈ -85.7

As a result, the value of the z-statistic for just one sample is about -85.7. This demonstrates that the observed proportion of COVID-19 cases in the unvaccinated population is significantly different from the expected proportion of COVID-19 cases in that population.

Learn more about z-statistic here:

https://brainly.com/question/30904553

#SPJ11

==========================================================

Explanation:

The notation \(a_1 = -4\) tells us that the first term is -4.

To generate the next term, we'll use the recursive rule \(a_n = 3*a_{n-1}-2\) which is probably better written as \(a_n = 3*(a_{n-1})-2\). That rule says: "Whatever the previous term is, multiply by 3 and subtract off 2 to get the next term".

This means,

Therefore, the first five terms are: -4, -14, -44, -134, -404

The computation shows that the placw on the hill where the cannonball land is 3.75m.

To find where on the hill the cannonball lands

So 0.15x = 2 + 0.12x - 0.002x²

Taking the LHS expression to the right and rearranging we have:

-0.002x² + 0.12x -.0.15x + 2 = 0.

So we have -0.002x²- 0.03x + 2 = 0  

I'll multiply through by -1 so we have

0.002x² + 0.03x -2 = 0.

This is a quadratic equation with two solutions x1 = 25 and x2 = -40 since x cannot be negative x = 25.

The second solution y = 0.15 * 25 = 3.75

Learn more about computations on:

https://brainly.com/question/4658834

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The flight of a cannonball toward a hill is described by the parabola y = 2 + 0.12x - 0.002x 2 . the hill slopes upward along a path given by y = 0.15x. where on the hill does the cannonball land?

Answer:

number one is -5 because -2-3 is -5

number two is 25 because negative times negative is a positive and because -5x-5 is 25

number three is 5 becuase 0 cancels out 3 so it is 5

Step-by-step explanation:

the only thing I could think is that you would replace the x with whatever it says x stands for

f (2) =2-3

g (5) = 2 {5}

h (0) = 5-3 {0}

then I would just solve hope it helps

The difference in volume between the two pyramids is 12,371,740 cubic feet.

To find the volume of a square pyramid, you use the formula :

V = (1/3)Bh, where B is the area of the base and h is the height.

Using the dimensions given in the table, we can calculate the volumes of the two pyramids:

- Volume of Bent Pyramid = (1/3)(619 feet * 619 feet)(332 feet) = 26,384,053.33 cubic feet
- Volume of Red Pyramid = (1/3)(722 feet * 722 feet)(341 feet) = 38,755,793.33 cubic feet

To find the difference in volume between the two pyramids, we subtract the smaller volume from the larger volume:

38,755,793.33 - 26,384,053.33 = 12,371,740 cubic feet.

Rounding to the nearest cubic foot, the difference in volume between the two pyramids is 12,371,740 cubic feet.

To know more about volumes refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/17615619#
#SPJ11

a) The electric field (Erec) and potential (V) at Prec (0,0,1) if rho_s = rho_o within region (1 ≤ r_c ≤ 2, 0 ≤ Φ ≤ 2π), and rho_s = 0 elsewhere are Erec = 0 and V = 0.

b) The electric field (Erec) and potential (V) at Prec (0,0,1) if rho_s = rho_o within region (1 ≤ r_c ≤ 2, 0 ≤ Φ ≤ π/2), and rho_s = 0 elsewhere are Erec = 0 and V = 0.

a) In this case, the surface charge density rho_s is nonzero only within the region defined by 1 ≤ r_c ≤ 2 and 0 ≤ Φ ≤ 2π. Since the point Prec is located at z = 1, which is above the plane z = 0, the contribution of rho_s to the electric field and potential at Prec is zero. This is because the electric field due to a surface charge distribution is perpendicular to the surface, and since Prec is located above the surface, there is no electric field contribution from rho_s. Similarly, since the electric field is zero, the potential is also zero at Prec.

b) In this case, the surface charge density rho_s is nonzero within the region defined by 1 ≤ r_c ≤ 2 and 0 ≤ Φ ≤ π/2. Again, since the point Prec is located at z = 1, above the plane z = 0, the contribution of rho_s to the electric field and potential at Prec is zero. This is because the electric field due to a surface charge distribution is perpendicular to the surface, and since Prec is located above the surface, there is no electric field contribution from rho_s. Consequently, the potential at Prec is also zero.

In both cases, the contributions from the surface charge distribution rho_s to the electric field and potential at Prec are zero due to the specific location of Prec with respect to the surface charge distribution.

For more questions like Charge distribution click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/32665807

#SPJ11

Answer:

diameter 12mm

Step-by-step explanation: