Answers
The true statement about producer surplus is D. The producer is below the market equilibrium price.
What is producer surplus?Producer surplus is the total revenue that a producer receives from selling their goods minus the total cost of production.
Producer surplus is the difference between the market price and the seller's production cost.
With a producer surplus, the producer does not need:
To downsize its factoryMore technologyGovernment to purchase the surplus.Thus, with a producer surplus, the production cost is below the market equilibrium price.
Learn more about producer surplus at https://brainly.com/question/15080185
Related Questions
Did Harrah's requirement that women
wear makeup violate Title VII?
Separate policys for both
requiring to look pleasant.
Did not violate Title
VII
Why?
Answers
Title VII is a law that prohibits employment discrimination based on an employee's gender, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin. It is possible for a company's dress code policy to violate Title VII if it is discriminatory or creates a hostile work environment for a particular group of employees. In the case of Harrah's requirement that women wear makeup, it is not clear whether it would violate Title VII.
Here's why:
On one hand, a dress code policy that requires women to wear makeup could be seen as discriminatory because it is based on gender. The policy could be seen as requiring women to look a certain way in order to be considered professional or attractive, which could create a hostile work environment for women who do not wish to wear makeup. If the policy had the effect of preventing women from being promoted or receiving equal pay because they chose not to wear makeup, then it would be discriminatory.
On the other hand, it could be argued that the policy is not discriminatory because it applies equally to all employees, regardless of gender. The policy could be seen as requiring all employees to look presentable and professional, which could be considered a legitimate business interest. If the policy did not have the effect of discriminating against women or creating a hostile work environment, then it would not violate Title VII
.In conclusion, it is not possible to say definitively whether Harrah's requirement that women wear makeup violated Title VII without more information about how the policy was applied in practice. It is possible that the policy was discriminatory, but it is also possible that it was not.
Learn more about discrimination from:
https://brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ11
Task With the aid of case law, discuss the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation and Damage, paying particular attention to duty and breach and apply these concepts to construction business. Guidance Note: You will need to cite case law for each principle that makes up the elements you discuss. You should then discuss how the principles apply to the construction workplace. Indicative word limit: 1800 words 40% of the grade
Answers
The legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are essential in the construction industry. Duty of Care refers to the responsibility that a person owes to another to ensure that they do not cause harm.
Breach of Duty of Care occurs when a person fails to take reasonable care and this failure causes harm to another. Causation is when the failure to take reasonable care is the cause of the harm. Damage refers to the harm suffered by the injured party.In the construction industry, the duty of care is owed by employers to employees, contractors, and members of the public who may be affected by their actions. The duty of care is also owed by the employees to their employers and co-workers.
A breach of duty of care can occur in many ways. An employer may fail to provide the necessary safety equipment or training to employees, which can cause harm. An employee may fail to follow safety procedures, which can cause harm to themselves or others.The case law that illustrates the concept of Duty of Care is Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). In this case, the claimant bought a bottle of ginger beer from a shop and found a decomposed snail inside the bottle. The claimant suffered from shock and gastroenteritis.
The court held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to the ultimate consumer to ensure that the product was safe.The case law that illustrates the concept of Breach of Duty of Care is Nettleship v Weston (1971). In this case, a learner driver was being taught by her friend and was involved in a car accident. The court held that the learner driver was responsible for the accident, and her friend, the instructor, was held liable for the injuries caused.The case law that illustrates the concept of Causation is Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969).
In this case, the claimant went to the hospital complaining of stomach pains and vomiting. The doctor on duty sent him home, and he died later that night from arsenic poisoning. The court held that the hospital was not liable for the death of the claimant as the failure to diagnose the condition was not the cause of the death.
The case law that illustrates the concept of Damage is Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963). In this case, the defendant left a manhole on the road with no warning signs. The claimant fell into the hole and suffered burns from molten tar. The court held that the defendant was liable for the injuries caused to the claimant as he failed to provide a warning of the danger.
In conclusion, the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are significant in the construction industry. These principles ensure that employers, employees, and members of the public are protected from harm. It is the responsibility of all parties to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others.
To know more about Duty of Care visit-
brainly.com/question/30782971
#SPJ11
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
Answers
The utilitarian approach to moral reasoning focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being by considering the costs and benefits of actions. It weighs the consequences of actions and aims to achieve the greatest net benefit for the greatest number of people.
In business ethics, while the utilitarian approach can be applied, it is not always the most common approach. This is because it may require weighing the costs and benefits of actions in a way that can be challenging or subjective, especially when considering factors such as individual rights, justice, and other moral values.
Other approaches, such as deontological ethics or virtue ethics, may also be employed in business ethics depending on the specific circumstances and values involved.
How did the Motor Voter Act affect voter registration in the United States?
Answers
The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, sometimes referred to as the "NVRA" and the "Motor Voter Act," was passed by Congress in an effort to improve voting rights for all citizens.
The Act has made it simpler for every American to sign up to vote and to keep that registration current. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, sometimes referred to as the "NVRA" or "motor voter law," lays forth certain rules for voter registration with regard to elections for federal offices.
Voter registration options must be made available to State motor vehicle offices, according to Section 5 of the NVRA.
Learn more about the Motor Voter Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/13560696
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a true statement about time limits?
A. They aren't a part of the court's rules of procedure
B. They aren't imposed by state law and court rules,
C. They involve civil cases, but not criminal cases,
D. They can be found in state statutes.
Answers
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
seeking the least erroState governments have Blank______ powers and the federal government have Blank______ powersneous solution to an insoluble problem
Answers
State governments have reserved powers and the federal government has enumerated powers solution to an insoluble problem.
The Senate and House of Representatives serve as a forum for the state governments to advocate the rights of their constituents and handle state legislation (that which the federal government does not handle). As long as those powers are not granted to the federal government, the tenth amendment reserves them to the states.
This entails, among other things, setting up public safety systems, controlling local government, regulating commerce and trade within the state, and managing state courts. Similar to the federal government, state governments are structured with a legislative, an executive branch led by a governor, and a judicial system.
Learn more about the state government here:
https://brainly.com/question/2397819
#SPJ1
Write 600-800 words on one of the following topic It will be graded according to presentation and use of language, content and organization, analysis and argument, and depth of knowledge. Your essay has to reflect discussions in the class. Please consult the rubric for details.
1- Who Makes American Foreign policy? How to explain the current distribution of foreign policy-making power between Congress and the Presidency? Does public opinion matter in the making of US foreign policy?
Answers
The United States of America is known worldwide for its global influence and reach, its ability to affect the global environment through its foreign policy and its global power.
America's foreign policy is the basic guide to its relations with other nations. It aims to protect the country's interests abroad while promoting democratic values at home and abroad. The current distribution of foreign policy-making power between Congress and the Presidency reflects a balance of power between these two branches of the government. The President holds primary authority for conducting foreign relations with other countries and developing foreign policy. However, the Congress has a vital role in making foreign policy decisions and carrying out policies as well. Moreover, public opinion has a significant impact on the making of US foreign policy.In America, the Constitution empowers both the President and Congress with certain powers related to foreign affairs. The President has the power to make treaties with foreign nations, and Congress has the power to approve these treaties. The President also has the power to appoint ambassadors, and Congress must approve these appointments. In addition, the President has the authority to negotiate with foreign governments on trade, military issues, and other matters. Congress has the power to approve or reject the budget for foreign aid, and they also have the ability to investigate foreign policy decisions made by the President.Congress also has an essential role in foreign policy-making, particularly in the areas of defense spending and war-making. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, and they also have the power to fund military operations. Congress can also hold hearings and investigate foreign policy decisions made by the President. Additionally, Congress can pass laws that limit the President's authority in foreign policy-making.In conclusion, the current distribution of foreign policy-making power between Congress and the Presidency reflects a balance of power between these two branches of the government. The President has the primary authority for conducting foreign relations with other countries and developing foreign policy, but Congress has a critical role in making foreign policy decisions and carrying out policies. Public opinion also plays an essential role in the making of US foreign policy. It influences the government's decision-making process and can impact foreign policy outcomes. Therefore, it is essential for the government to consider public opinion when making foreign policy decisions.
To Know More about essential visit:
brainly.com/question/3248441
#SPJ11
An employer may be required to pay an employee for work that the employer did not specifically authorize the employee to perform
Answers
which case would the federal courts be permitted to wear under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction?
Answers
Federal courts would be permitted to hear cases under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction if the following conditions are met:
The parties in the case are citizens of different states.The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional threshold, which is currently set at $75,000 (as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021).Under diversity jurisdiction, the federal courts have the authority to hear civil cases between citizens of different states, even if the issues involved are based on state law. This allows for a neutral federal forum to resolve disputes between parties from different states, providing an alternative to state courts.
It's important to note that diversity jurisdiction only applies to civil cases, not criminal cases. Additionally, there are certain exceptions and additional requirements that may apply in specific situations. Consulting with an attorney or referring to current legal statutes and precedents would provide the most accurate and up-to-date information regarding diversity jurisdiction.
To know more about Federal courts
brainly.com/question/31037815
#SPJ11
the government is considering placing additional taxes on foreign steel imports that are a proportion of the value of the imported steel. this is an example of
A. an ad valorem tariff
B. a subsidy tax
C. a specific tariff
D. an import quota
Answers
The government is considering placing additional taxes on foreign steel imports that are a proportion of the value of the imported steel. this is an example of an ad valorem tariff. The Correct answer is A.
Ad valorem tariffs are the kind of taxes intended to safeguard domestic manufacturers and limit imports from other nations. It is computed as a percentage of the overall import value of the products.
As an illustration, the United States imported a number of cars from Thailand. As a result, the ad valorem tariff is set at 3% of the value of all imported cars from Thailand.
Learn more about ad valorem tariff at https://brainly.com/question/15315804
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not a primary source that was used as a basis for the government of the United States?
Answers
Materials that are NOT primary sources include: Books written after a historical event by someone who was not involved in the event. Books are considered Secondary Sources.
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
Answers
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
how have courts reacted on the ground that the hardships of nuisance abatement that would be imposed on the polluter and on the community, are relatively greater than the hardships suffered by the plaintiff.
Answers
Courts responded on the grounds that the burdens of nuisance abatement that would be placed on the polluter and the community required courts to set regulations that assured that polluters would never be required to abate their nuisances past the point where they could no longer be tolerated.
The eradication of a problem by the party who has suffered without resorting to legal action is referred to as abatement of nuisance. The law does not favor this type of remedy, but is accessible in specific situations.
Occasionally, a plaintiff's latent sensitivity or susceptibility to more severe harm causes the plaintiff's injuries on abatement of nuisance to be far worse than those that would have been sustained by a typical individual.
Therefore, the nuisance abatement reassured that polluters wouldn't ever be obliged to stop their annoyances before they were intolerable.
Learn more about the nuisance abatement, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17751112
#SPJ4
CIVICS (question in photo below)
Answers
Answer:
I think the answer should be the last one "placing a trade embargo on oil
Explanation:
The reason I believe the answer is number 4 is because a domestic policy affects or applies to people/institutions within a particular country and they tend to be internal and so after using that definition the best-fit answer would be number 4.
TRUE / FALSE.
states often have their own versions of federal administrative agencies.
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A baker who had a contract for blueberry muffins tried unsuccessfully to negotiate with a blueberry farmer to purchase blueberries. The following evening, the baker waited until the farmer left her roadside stand and then entered the farmer's adjacent blueberry fields, and picked 25 quarts of blueberries. As the baker was loading the blueberries into his van, the baker had second thoughts about what he had done. Realizing the farmer would have no problem selling the blueberries at his stand, the baker carried the buckets filled with blueberries to the front of the farmer's stand. A few moments later, he was apprehended and charged with larceny.
Of the following, which would provide with baker with the best defense?
The baker had begun to voluntarily return the blueberries before he was apprehended.
The baker had not permanently deprived the farmer of her blueberries.
The farmer would not have suffered a loss because she could have sold the blueberries at her stand.
The baker had picked the blueberries himself.
Answers
The correct option of this question is: The baker had picked the blueberries himself.
"Larceny" and "burglary" are frequently utilized conversely to portray local misdemeanors where an individual unlawfully removes and conveys the property of one more without consent. Be that as it may, the suitable term to utilize relies upon state regulation.
Peruse on to look further into larceny to understand being accused of this wrongdoing and what results you might confront whenever indicted.
While talking in lawful terms, in any case, the definition and use of "robbery" and still up in the air by the state. The varieties between these terms makes it particularly significant for you to counsel an accomplished protection lawyer to understand how the wrongdoing is characterized in the jurisdiction in which you are charged.
to know more about Jurisdiction click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
1.) Describe an economic problem the government in America is trying to solve. What solution to this public policy issue do you think would work best?
2.) Explain why this policy would be the best solution using Sowell's three questions.
3.) Why is your proposed solution the best response to this issue?
4.) What is the cost of your proposed solution?
ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is there evidence (statistics or statements from experts) from a credible source that shows your proposed solution would work? Remember you can use the Helpful Links tab on our class homepage.
Answers
An economic issue the government in America is trying to handle is the problem the inflation. The solution that can be used to combat it is called contractionary monetary policy.
A rise in the nation's unemployment rate could be a cost of implementing contractionary monetary policy.
What is the most effective strategy for reducing inflation in the economy?Implementing a contractionary monetary policy is a common method of controlling inflation. A contractionary policy aims to lower the amount of money available in an economy by reducing bond prices and boosting interest rates. Price declines, as well as slower inflation, and less consumption follow as a result.
One crucial monetary strategy to fight inflation is to manage the flow of money through the economy. If the money supply shrinks, prices will rise and demand will decrease.
Note that Another method of reducing the amount of money in circulation is when the government bans certain coins or denominations of paper money. As a result of the economic slowdown and decreasing production, businesses hire fewer personnel.
Learn more about Raising inflation from
https://brainly.com/question/8149429
#SPJ1
Drugs which are used to reduce pain?
Narcotic
Inhalant
Heroin
Hallucinogen
Answers
Drugs called narcotics are frequently used to treat pain. They are also known as opioids, and they block the perception of pain by binding to opioid receptors in the brain.
The Pain reducer drugsNarcotics are drugs that are commonly used to reduce pain. They are also referred to as opioids, and they work by attaching to opioid receptors in the brain, blocking the sensation of pain. Some examples of narcotics used for pain relief include codeine, morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl.
Inhalants and hallucinogens are not typically used for pain relief. Inhalants are substances that are inhaled to produce mind-altering effects, and they can be dangerous and even deadly when used for their psychoactive properties. Hallucinogens are substances that alter perception, mood, and cognitive processes and are generally used for their mind-altering effects rather than for pain relief.
Heroin is a type of opioid, which is sometimes used for pain relief in certain medical situations, such as in the treatment of cancer-related pain. However, due to its highly addictive nature and the risk of overdose, it is not commonly prescribed for pain relief and is illegal in most countries.
Learn more on pain reducer drug here: https://brainly.com/question/1320853
#SPJ1
The supreme court on monday rejected an appeal seeking to give american citizenship to people born in which territory?.
Answers
The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.
A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.
To know more about citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3588983
#SPJ4
what is the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of
the European Union, over the definitive interpretation of EU law?
and why is it important for the purposes of this Opinion?
Answers
The exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union over the definitive interpretation of EU law refers to the authority vested in the court to provide the final and authoritative interpretation of EU law.
What is exclusive jurisdiction?The exclusive jurisdiction is the power of a court to decide cases within a particular geographic area, subject matter, or class of parties. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is empowered by Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) to provide definitive interpretation of European Union (EU) law in response to requests for a preliminary ruling from national courts.
This gives the CJEU the exclusive jurisdiction over the definitive interpretation of EU law, meaning that the CJEU's interpretation is the authoritative and final interpretation of EU law. This implies that any decisions rendered by the CJEU are binding on national courts, as well as on the European institutions and Member States.
The opinion, in this case, relates to the interpretation of EU law in the context of an environmental matter and therefore, the CJEU's exclusive jurisdiction over the definitive interpretation of EU law is essential for resolving the issue. Therefore, the CJEU's exclusive jurisdiction over the definitive interpretation of EU law is crucial in ensuring that the EU law is applied uniformly across all Member States and that its application is consistent with the aims and objectives of the EU.
Learn more about jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
You are walking down a street and pass by a beer brewery. A barrel rolls out of a third story window and injures you. You have no idea how this occurred, and you will have difficulty providing that the brewery was at fault. What legal theory will you best if you sue the brewery?
a. Res ipsa loquitur
b. Strict liability
c. Negligence per se
d. Battery
Answers
Answer:
B) strict liability ( I think )
Explanation:
Hope that helped! :)
You are the legal advisor of a big advertising company, Clooney Ideas. They have a lot of clients and every month you get various Television Commercials (TVCs) ideas from the art director and concept writers to analyze and give legal clearance. This month the following concepts / idea were presented to you:
Idea # 1 (Japan Chai)
The TVC will show a skinny (thin) person fighting a wrestling match (kushti) at a village in interior Punjab. He is foiled miserably by his opponent (a big pahalwan). The skinny person is then approached by his friend who says “Japan cha sumo wrestler ki pehchan!” The skinny person has the tea and then immediately becomes a big fat sumo wrestler (like Yokozuna). In the next round he thrashes his opponent and wins. He is hailed by everyone in the village. In the last scene the skinny person says “Tussi bhi piyo! Sumo wrestler na banay to Rs. 1000 inam!”
Idea # 2 (Awami insect killer)
A person (famous cricketer Zameer Akram) is shown being bitten by mosquitos. He goes to a doctor and tells him that for some reason mosquitos love him. The doctor (who is the famous hero Fahad Khan wearing a lab coat) says, “Hum nay Awami insect spray, dus (10) patients per kiya, or 100% positive result raha!” In the next scene Zameer Akram is shown playing a night cricket match and all mosquitoes near him are falling dead immediately, a batsman who is about to face him also runs for his life like a mosquito. In the end Zameer Akram is shown holding Awami insect killer and saying “Awami mein hai Awam ki power!”
You are separately told by the makers of Awami insect killer that the 100% success rate is based on lab conditions i.e. the patients were exposed to rare breed of mosquitos found in Africa only. The spray will have very little effect on mosquitos found in Pakistan.
Idea # 3 (Dosti chewing gum)
A group of 6 friends will be shown in the first scene who are sitting idle and getting bored in a university. All of a sudden one of the friends pops out a box of dosti chewing gum and gives it to all of them. After eating the chewing gum, all of them get energized, start to run around, three friends are shown flying in the sky with wings. One of them is riding a flying horse. Two of the friends are shown getting on a rocket and flying to space. In the last scene all friends shout collectively “Dosti chewing gum is so friendly!”
Idea 4 (Afridi whitening cream)
In the first scene, three African Americans are shown trying to give trials for the Chinese basketball team. However, due to their skin tone they are rejected despite having exceptional skills. They go home depressed.
In the next scene their Pakistani friend comes to their place and says “You can be as fair as me, apply Afridi whitening cream for 30 days, if you don’t become fair, you three can win a ticket to Hawaii”
The three basket players are then shown using the Afridi whitening cream and growing fairer each day. Eventually all three of them turn into famous, Pakistani actors. They appear for basketball trials again and are selected for the Chinese team.
At the end of the TVC a voice over says, “Afridi whitening cream, world’s number 1 whitening cream”
Q-1 Discuss the legal implication for each of the above ideas. In particular, which ideas (from a legal perspective) are the best and the worst?
Q-2 Please elaborate how will you change the ideas to cover the legal risks involved.
Answers
Answer:
You are the legal advisor of a big advertising company, Clooney Ideas. They have a lot of clients and every month you get various Television Commercials (TVCs) ideas from the art director and concept writers to analyze and give legal clearance. This month the following concepts / idea were presented to you:
Idea # 1 (Japan Chai)
The TVC will show a skinny (thin) person fighting a wrestling match (kushti) at a village in interior Punjab. He is foiled miserably by his opponent (a big pahalwan). The skinny person is then approached by his friend who says “Japan cha sumo wrestler ki pehchan!” The skinny person has the tea and then immediately becomes a big fat sumo wrestler (like Yokozuna). In the next round he thrashes his opponent and wins. He is hailed by everyone in the village. In the last scene the skinny person says “Tussi bhi piyo! Sumo wrestler na banay to Rs. 1000 inam!”
Idea # 2 (Awami insect killer)
A person (famous cricketer Zameer Akram) is shown being bitten by mosquitos. He goes to a doctor and tells him that for some reason mosquitos love him. The doctor (who is the famous hero Fahad Khan wearing a lab coat) says, “Hum nay Awami insect spray, dus (10) patients per kiya, or 100% positive result raha!” In the next scene Zameer Akram is shown playing a night cricket match and all mosquitoes near him are falling dead immediately, a batsman who is about to face him also runs for his life like a mosquito. In the end Zameer Akram is shown holding Awami insect killer and saying “Awami mein hai Awam ki power!”
You are separately told by the makers of Awami insect killer that the 100% success rate is based on lab conditions i.e. the patients were exposed to rare breed of mosquitos found in Africa only. The spray will have very little effect on mosquitos found in Pakistan.
Idea # 3 (Dosti chewing gum)
A group of 6 friends will be shown in the first scene who are sitting idle and getting bored in a university. All of a sudden one of the friends pops out a box of dosti chewing gum and gives it to all of them. After eating the chewing gum, all of them get energized, start to run around, three friends are shown flying in the sky with wings. One of them is riding a flying horse. Two of the friends are shown getting on a rocket and flying to space. In the last scene all friends shout collectively “Dosti chewing gum is so friendly!”
Idea 4 (Afridi whitening cream)
In the first scene, three African Americans are shown trying to give trials for the Chinese basketball team. However, due to their skin tone they are rejected despite having exceptional skills. They go home depressed.
In the next scene their Pakistani friend comes to their place and says “You can be as fair as me, apply Afridi whitening cream for 30 days, if you don’t become fair, you three can win a ticket to Hawaii”
The three basket players are then shown using the Afridi whitening cream and growing fairer each day. Eventually all three of them turn into famous, Pakistani actors. They appear for basketball trials again and are selected for the Chinese team.
At the end of the TVC a voice over says, “Afridi whitening cream, world’s number 1 whitening cream”
Q-1 Discuss the legal implication for each of the above ideas. In particular, which ideas (from a legal perspective) are the best and the worst?
Q-2 Please elaborate how will you change the ideas to cover the legal risks involved.
if a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, then firms with valuable technologies will be reluctant to bring them into that country. t/f
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, firms with valuable technologies may be reluctant to bring them into that country. Without strong intellectual property protections, the firms' technologies and innovations may be vulnerable to theft or copying, which could undermine the firms' ability to profit from their investments in research and development. This could discourage the firms from investing in the country, or lead them to invest less in research and development. Strong intellectual property rights protections are therefore an important factor in encouraging innovation and economic growth.
which of the follwoing are illegal under the liquor licence
act?
Answers
Allowing guests who smoke to take their drink with them outside of the licensed area, Serving or selling alcohol to an already intoxicated guest and Accepting an out-of-province I.D. are illegal under the liquor license act. Option A, B & D is the correct answer.
In Ontario, the sale, serving, and consumption of alcoholic beverages are all governed under the Liquor License and Control Act, 2019. The legislation defines conditions for getting and keeping a liquor license, specifies policies for serving and consuming alcohol responsibly, and offers instructions for enforcing the law. Option A, B & D is the correct answer.
Additionally, the Act creates the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), which is in charge of overseeing and upholding the legislation. In order to guarantee legal compliance, the AGCO has the authority to issue, revoke, or suspend liquor licenses as well as to carry out inspections and investigations. The Act also has provisions for fines and punishments for breaking the law.
Learn more about Alcoholic Beverage here:
https://brainly.com/question/29791214
#SPJ4
The complete question is, "Select all that apply. Which of the following are illegal under the Liquor License Act?
A. Allowing guests who smoke to take their drink with them outside of the licensed area.
B. Serving or selling alcohol to an already intoxicated guest.
C. Allowing guests to taste each other's drinks.
D. Accepting an out-of-province
When you see this type of traffic sign, the listed speed
A: Is the maximum speed you can safely travel in this area.
B: Is the minimum speed allowed on the highway.
C: Is the speed you should drive during bad weather conditions.
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Which of the following is an example of a suspicionless search?
A) Search of a vehicle without consent or probable cause
B) Search of a person and bag at a highway checkpoint
C) Search of a home without
consent or probable cause
D) All of the above
Answers
Answer:
Imma go with D. Not sure with B, but since A and B are it makes since its D.
Explanation:
Choose the response that best defines gross income.
All worldwide income realized in any form, from whatever source derived, unless specifically excluded by law.
Financial gain derived from labor or capital, less any deductions or adjustments.
Income less allowable reductions.
Specific income items identified and classified as taxable income.
Answers
Answer:
Specific income items identified and classified as taxable income.
Explanation:
A man claims he had no idea the car he bought had entered the island illegally. If this is the case, what provisions have been established to allow the man to keep or receive value for such a good? Explain the instances by citing the relevant section(s) of the Jamaican Customs Act.
Answers
If the value of the car is less than or equal to the prescribed customs duty, the importer is entitled to immediate payment at a rate of 150%. If it is more, he will obtain a permit for the extra, otherwise, he is guilty of smuggling, and the fact that he was unaware that it had been done so does not absolve him of responsibility.
One of the provisions for treating buyers fairly has been created in the Customs Act. The seizure of any imported items is addressed in Section 10 of the law.
Even if the buyer may not have been aware that the vehicle was stolen when he purchased it, he is nonetheless liable for taking stolen property and must seek for a permit from customs if there is an excess duty on the sale.
To learn more on the Jamaican Custom Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32529651
#SPJ4
The right to own a gun is found in which Amendment?
O First
O Second
O Third
O Fourth
Answers
which supreme court justices attended the state of the union
Answers
Five Supreme Court Justices attended the State of the Union address along with two of their predecessors. Justices Stephen Breyer and Anthony Kennedy, who were regular attendees during their time on the bench, have returned for the annual speech.
They are accompanied by their successors, Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Brett Kavanaugh, as well as Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Elena Kagan, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett. It is noteworthy that the last time a former Justice attended was during former President Clinton's State of the Union address on February 4, 1997, when Byron White joined.
Breyer and Kennedy have been quite regular while on the bench, being the only two justices to attend former President George W. Bush's address in 2002 when seven of their colleagues opted out.
To know more about Supreme Court Justices
https://brainly.com/question/25287186
#SPJ4