which of the following is not one of the rights afforded to students (or the parents of a minor student) under the family educational rights and privacy act (ferpa)?

27

Explanation:

in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa

Explanation:

These amendments include the fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and the fourteenth amendments. Their purpose is meant to ensure that people are treated fairly if suspected or arrested for crimes.

Answer:

This court is likely to rule in favor of orin.

Explanation:

There is a great possibility that this court will not dismiss this suit due to the fact that Quik is a Maine corporation they went ahead to advertise their product in new York. The court in new York has every right to act on the jurisdiction over the corporation based on this fact. Any corporation involved in the production and distribution of food supplements can be held responsible for any negative effect of their product on users. Quik will face the law.

According to Hamilton, the judges should be the keepers of the constitutional conscience because he believed that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that it is the judiciary's responsibility to interpret and apply the Constitution in a manner consistent with its original meaning and intent.

Hence the correct answer is Judges.

Hamilton believed that judges should uphold the fundamental laws embodied in the Constitution rather than the laws created by the legislature that are not fundamental. This would require judges to interpret and apply the Constitution to resolve conflicts between government branches and ensure that the government operates within the bounds of the Constitution.

To know more about Judges, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1059156

#SPJ4

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.

The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.

To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562

#SPJ11

Answer:

PSD

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

mention four benefits the people on earth derive from oceans

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.

A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.

Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.

A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.

Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.

You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176

#SPJ11

Answer:

fancy

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.

- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.

- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.

- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.

These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.

For more such questions on colonization, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/27868020

#SPJ8

Ideas, innovations, and creations with intellectual property are important to a company.

B) An invention that has a patent.

Intellectual property protection prevents a company's innovations from being used by rival businesses to their financial advantage. It grants a company the right to make the only profits from its ideas. By guaranteeing that businesses will profit from their innovations, protecting intellectual property promotes research and development.

Ideas, innovations, and creations with intellectual property are important to a company. A company's competitive advantage comes from these intangible resources. A person or organisation will benefit fully from ideas and creations if intellectual property is protected.

Learn more about business.

https://brainly.com/question/15826679

#SPJ4

The damages that Dave can ask for in his suit to his supplier are:

The damages that Dave is likely to recover are:

Dave spent $500 to re - advertise the big opening which are costs that he would not have incurred if the supplier had sent the right sweets. He can therefore get back damages for this.

Dave also can sue for the shipping costs to the supplier because the supplier was at fault and if they weren't, Dave would not have to have spent $100 on the shipping costs.

There are also reputational damages from postponing an opening ceremony. Some people who would have come would no longer be interested either because they are now busy, or because they don't trust Dave any more.

Dave would also be allowed to sue for his worker costs but there is a chance he doesn't get this if the other side argues that it isn't guaranteed he would have had any sales in the two weeks he paid them.

Find out more on damages at https://brainly.com/question/21943000

#SPJ1

The answer response are given below:

Intestate: A person who dies without a valid will is said to have died intestate. In this case, their assets will be distributed according to state law, rather than the individual's wishes.

Therefore, Administrator or Administratrix: An administrator or administratrix is the person appointed by the court to manage the estate of an intestate decedent. The administrator is responsible for collecting and distributing the assets of the estate to the rightful heirs.

Learn more about intestate at:

https://brainly.com/question/1140802

#SPJ1

Answer:

.

Explanation:

A. Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs

B. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination

C. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology

D. Scientific Working Group for the Forensic Analysis of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Terrorism

Answer:

100,000USD

Explanation:

Learning knowledge of to do, doing to examine, earning to stay, and dwelling to serve are the phrases of which ffa statementThe FFA motto is a short assertion that gives FFA members words to stay via as they enjoy the agency. The motto identifies some very essential center values of the enterprise.

The countrywide FFA organization has advanced in response to extended possibilities to be had inside the enterprise of agriculture. modern FFA enables participants to prepare for careers in agribusiness, remarketing, science, communications, schooling, horticulture, production, herbal assets, forestry, and plenty of different various fields.

It's far one of the three additives of agricultural schooling. The respectable name of the employer is the countrywide FFA business enterprise. The letters “FFA” stand for destiny Farmers of the USA. those letters are part of our history and our history in order to never exchange.

In 1988 the call of the enterprise was changed from "destiny Farmers of America" to the "countrywide FFA employer" to deal with the business, science, and era elements of agriculture in addition to farming.

Learn more about FFA here:

https://brainly.com/question/5305752

#SPJ4

Answer:

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis requires that cases follow the precedents of other similar cases in similar jurisdictions.

Explanation:

Answer:

American courts follow the doctrine of stare decisis, which requires them to defer to previous cases on similar issues. Such cases are referred to as "precedents." Part I of this Commentary will provide an overview of precedent's role in the American legal system.

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

Terrorism has no unambiguous or widely agreed-upon meaning, according to Alvarez and Bachman. Terrorism is a multifaceted and complex issue, and many scholars and experts in various fields have attempted to define it. Alvarez and Bachman believe that terrorism is difficult to describe, and they have offered three reasons for this.

The first explanation is that the term has been overused and abused in public and academic conversations. The overuse of the term terrorism has resulted in the devaluation of its meaning. Furthermore, the use of the term to refer to various kinds of violence by different groups in different situations has caused confusion and ambiguity. It has been used to describe the actions of groups such as environmental activists, labour unions, and political activists, among others, in addition to violent acts committed by individuals and state actors.

The second reason is that terrorism is context-specific. The circumstances surrounding the act of violence and the perpetrators' motivation and objectives are important considerations in determining whether an act of violence constitutes terrorism or not. A distinction must be made between acts of terrorism and other types of violence, such as war, crimes, or acts of resistance, based on the specific context.

Finally, there is no single, accepted definition of terrorism. Numerous attempts have been made to define terrorism, yet none have been universally accepted. Because the meaning of terrorism is so vague, it is difficult to establish clear criteria for distinguishing it from other forms of violence. Furthermore, because the meaning of terrorism changes over time and in response to various factors, defining terrorism becomes even more difficult.

To know more about terrorism visit :

https://brainly.com/question/19481913

#SPJ11

Answer:fasle

Explanation:

Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, protected classes are specified in relation to federal anti-discrimination law.

Discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or handicap is illegal under federal law. Since 1866, it has been unlawful to discriminate on the basis of race or color. Actions that are likely to offend, insult, demean or intimidate another person are prohibited by the Racial Discrimination Act.

Equal protection under the law is provided under the United States 14th amendment. No citizen's personal liberties or rights may be violated only because they do not identify with the dominant race, religion, ethnicity, or gender, according to this.

To learn more about Antidiscrimination law

https://brainly.com/question/29974451

#SPJ4

Answer Some signs of impaired drivers are improper lane use, failure to signal, or unpredictable stopping and swerving of the car. These are just some of the signs that a driver may be impaired if you do see these signs on the road try to keep as much space possible between you and the car who demonstrates these signs.

Explanation:

1) In order to perfect its security interest in the collateral, the creditor would need to file a financing statement for the 4-Runner and the six iMacs. The financing statement would need to include the name and address of the debtor (Barton), the type and amount of debt, and the collateral being covered by the financing statement.

2) If KDM Electronics filed a financing statement that listed only Brighton Homes as the debtor's name, it would not properly perfect its security interest in the office computers. This is because the financing statement would only cover the personal property that Barton purchased using the same name (Brighton Homes), and would not cover the office computers.

3) A PMSI in consumer goods is a security interest in consumer goods that is perfected by filing a financing statement with the appropriate state agency. The purchases that would qualify as a PMSI in consumer goods would be the iMacs that Barton purchased from KDM Electronics.

4) Under Article 9, a secured party has the right to take possession of the collateral if the debtor defaults on the loan or other obligation. In this case, KDM Electronics would have the right to take possession of the surround-sound system if Barton defaults on the loan for that purchase.

However, KDM Electronics would not have the right to keep the system if it decides to do so on its own. This is because the rights of a secured party under Article 9 are limited to the specific collateral that is covered by the financing statement, and do not extend to any other assets. Therefore, KDM Electronics would need to sell the surround-sound system in order to recover its investment.

Learn more about   financing statement

https://brainly.com/question/30393980

#SPJ11

Full Question: Paul Barton owned a small property-management company, doing business as Brighton Homes. In October, Barton went on a spending spree. First, he bought a Bose surround-sound system for his home from KDM Electronics. The next day, he purchased a Wilderness Systems kayak from Outdoor Outfitters, and the day after that he bought a new Toyota 4-Runner financed through Bridgeport Auto. Two weeks later, Barton purchased six new iMac computers for his office, also from KDM Electronics. Barton bought all of these items under installment sales contracts. Six months later, Barton’s property-management business was failing. He could not make the payments due on any of these purchases and thus defaulted on the loans. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

For which of Barton’s purchases (the surround-sound system, the kayak, the 4-Runner, and the six iMacs) would the creditor need to file a financing statement to perfect its security interest?

Suppose that Barton’s contract for the office computers mentioned only the name Brighton Homes. What would be the consequences if KDM Electronics filed a financing statement that listed only Brighton Homes as the debtor’s name?

Which of these purchases would qualify as a PMSI in consumer goods?

Suppose that after KDM Electronics repossesses the surround-sound system, it decides to keep the system rather than sell it. Can KDM do this under Article 9? Why or why no

When the Supreme Court accepts an appellate case, each party must file briefs explaining their legal arguments and evidence. Each side will then be given a limited amount of time to present their case orally in front of the Supreme Court, typically 30 minutes per side.

When a case is accepted by the Supreme Court, it means the court has agreed to review the decision made by the lower court. Each party is required to file legal briefs outlining their arguments, supporting evidence and relevant legal precedent.

After these briefs are filed, oral arguments are presented in front of the Supreme Court justices. During these oral arguments, each side has 30 minutes to present their case, and the justices may ask questions to clarify any issues or seek further explanation.

After all arguments have been heard, the justices will deliberate and make a decision on the case.

For more questions like Supreme Court click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

False- Punitive damages may be recovered in a concurrent common-law fraud action.

The given statement because punitive damages are not permitted under federal statutory law, a plaintiff suing for violation of section 11 of the 1933 act cannot file a concurrent common-law fraud action is FALSE.

Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 imposes strict liability on issuers, underwriters, and other specified parties for material misstatements or omissions in a registration statement. However, it does not preempt common-law fraud claims, which require a showing of intent or recklessness.

Although federal law does not provide for punitive damages in securities cases, some state laws do. Therefore, a plaintiff may be able to recover punitive damages in a concurrent common-law fraud action filed in state court.

In fact, courts have consistently held that Section 11 does not displace common-law fraud claims, and that a plaintiff may pursue both causes of action concurrently. The plaintiff may also elect to pursue only the common-law fraud claim and waive the Section 11 claim.

To know more about federal statutory law, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/26195686#

#SPJ11

The thing which the complaint should include is b. a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.

This refers to the class action that is filed by a person or company against another in a law court, seeking redress.

Hence, we can see that based on the tenets of law, if Gilbert wants to initiate a lawsuit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint, he should include a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.

Read more about lawsuits here:

https://brainly.com/question/1184001

#SPJ1

Answer:

Article 14 guarantees to all persons equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.

Answer:

article 14

Explanation: