Which of the following is NOT a duty of state legislatures?
A. vote on motions to impeach federal judges
B.pass state laws that enhance the well-being of its residents
C.negotiate between various factions and interest groups in the state
D.consider amendments to the US Constitution when sent from the federal government
Answers
Answer:
consider amendments to the US Constitution when sent from the federal government
Explanation:
Related Questions
The return inward day book had been overcast by $90
Answers
The return inward day book had been overcast by $90. $110 debit on the suspense account in the journal entry.
What is journal entry?The term journal entry was the beginning part of the book Keeping. The journal entry was the founded on the debit and the credit record in the book entry. The Journal was the pro forma of the statement and the based on the entry on the particular statement as the record.
The journal entry of the XYZ company.
Date Particular Dr. Cr.
A payment of rent $200
Sales Ac $90
Suspense account $110 debit
As a result, the significance of the return inward day book had been overcast are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on journal entry, here;
https://brainly.com/question/20421012
#SPJ9
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
A trader prepared a trial balance which did not balance. The difference was posted to a suspense
account.
The following errors have now been found.
1 The returns inwards account had been overcast by $90.
2 A payment of $200 for rent had been entered correctly in the cash book but had not been posted to the rent account.
What was the opening balance on the suspense account?
A $110 credit
B $110 debit
C $290 credit
D $290 debit
Read Chief Justice Warren's decision from the Miranda case.
The entire thrust of police interrogation
was to put the defendant in such an emotional state as to impair
his capacity for rational judgment. . . . [T]he choice on his part to speak to the police-was not made
knowingly.
What did Chief Justice Warren say about how Miranda's confession was made?
• Miranda was aware of his rights when he made his confession.
© Miranda incriminated himself intentionally and knowingly.
O Miranda was unaware of his rights but his confession could be used.
• Miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.
Answers
The correct answer is: "Miranda incriminated himself without knowing he could refuse to do so.
Have a good day.
What is not true of civil law
A. The burden of proof requires a “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard
B. The goal of punishment is to make monetary payment or issue an order to act
C. It’s purpose is to assign responsibility in a dispute between citizens
D. An attorney at no cost is not guaranteed
Answers
Out of these four personal traits—integrity, loyalty, dependability, and punctuality—which do you think is more important for a criminal justice professional and why?
I NEED HELP RIGHT AWAY
Answers
Integrity is the most important personal trait for a criminal justice professional, as it ensures honesty, ethics, and impartiality in upholding the law and serving justice.
What Personal Trait is more important for a criminal justice professional?Integrity is the most crucial personal trait for a criminal justice professional. It encompasses honesty, ethics, and a commitment to upholding the law and serving justice impartially.
A professional with integrity builds trust, maintains credibility, and ensures fairness in the criminal justice system. It is the foundation upon which all other traits, such as loyalty, dependability, and punctuality, can be effectively exercised, as integrity ensures adherence to ethical standards and a steadfast dedication to the pursuit of justice.
Learn more about Personal Trait on:
https://brainly.com/question/29969358
#SPJ1
Marcus has discovered an unknown white powder in an envelope at the crime scene. He is running tests on the powder to determine what the powder is. What is this process known as? A. probability B. testimony C. identification D. comparison
Answers
Answer:
identification
Explanation:
Why did rosa parks refuse to give her seat up
Answers
Answer:
The answer why Rose Park refuse to give up her seat because she wanted equality. Therefore, she got kick out the bus and got arrested.
how to maintain the social order in society?
this is for my paragraph
Answers
Answer:
There are several ways to maintain social order in society:
Establishing laws and enforcing them: Having clear laws that are enforced by a legal system helps to establish rules for behavior in society and promotes order.
Promoting social norms and values: Teaching and promoting values such as respect, honesty, and responsibility can help to create a sense of shared purpose and encourage people to behave in ways that contribute to social order.
Encouraging positive interpersonal relationships: Building strong, positive relationships within a community can foster a sense of belonging and create a sense of obligation to behave in ways that contribute to social order.
Providing social support and resources: Ensuring that people have access to resources such as education, healthcare, and employment can help to reduce social tensions and promote stability.
Maintaining effective communication and dialogue: Having open lines of communication and encouraging dialogue can help to resolve conflicts and promote understanding and cooperation among different groups in society.
Explanation:
Pls help me with this question
Answers
A property located in the county has 50 acres. The property has a house, a barn, and a shed. What type of property would this be considered under Florida Law?
Answers
Answer:
Agricultural property
Explanation:
The size of the given property under consideration has a size of 50 acres and it contains a barn, a shed and a house
A barn is a building meant for agricultural purposes and it is usually found in farms, and is a structure housing horses, or cattle or other livestock where also can be kept fodder, grain and equipment
According to Florida law an agricultural property is one that is larger than 10 acres and is used for agricultural purposes.
In no fewer than 100-words, explain why a retired civilian police officer would make an excellent civilian military police officer.
Answers
Answer: It's mundane for police officers to retire while they are plausibly young, which gives them a unique chance to dedicate several years to an incipient vocation. A retired civilian police officer would make a great civilian military police officer due to their antecedent experience. Not only are they used to the environment they are going to go in kenning and probably having done a lot more than your average civilian. They may additionally make more pay than they would at a mundane department due to this, it could be optically discerned as an extra income for the person after they get out of the department.
Explanation: boss baby approved
what is the first thing that must be done at a crime scene
Answers
Answer:
1. Identify Scene Dimensions · Locate the focal point of the scene · Establish a perimeter large enough to contain relevant evidence.
Explanation:
HELP PLEASE HURRY
Why do religious groups tend to be the major critics of privatized prisons?
a. The groups believe the private prisons are funded by the gambling industry.
b. The prisons are seen as immoral and unethical.
c. The groups have questions about the prison cleanliness and maintenance.
d. The prisons are believed to be ungodly.
Answers
Answer:
I believe its A
Explanation:
Answer:
Because the groups are seen as immoral and unethical
Explanation:
im taking the test and looked it up
The United States Supreme Court has held the decision that capital punishment, or the death penalty is appropriate punishment for murder. True or false?
Answers
Answer: False
It really depends on how much murder happened, but all in all its FALSE. You will be sentenced to life in prison most likely.
i don't need help but why do you need to pay for pemium
Answers
Answer:because the people are greedy and want more money they cant just help lol
Explanation:
Drag each tile to the correct box.
What is the correct sequence of steps in the WTO procedure for settling global trade disputes?
compensation
->>
implementation
->>
retaliation
consultation
Answers
The WTO dispute resolution process consists of three main phases: i) discussions among the parties; (ii) decisions made by panels and, if necessary, the Appellate Body; and (iii) the way the ruling is put into action.
What is the WTO's mechanism for resolving disputes?Negotiations are the ideal method for resolving disputes. WTO members can request the establishment of a panel to settle the dispute if this is not possible. The panel will issue a report that can be challenged on legal grounds in the WTO's Appellate Body.
What are the steps involved in resolving a dispute?The procedures consist of three major steps: 1) the appellant's submission in writing; ( 2) the appellee and third participant, respectively, submitted written arguments; and, thirdly, an oral hearing of the Appellate Body and the parties.
To learn more about WTO's Appellate Body here:
https://brainly.com/question/30199694
#SPJ1
Britta was babysitting for her neighbor’s 2-year-old and had just put little Justin down for a nap. So she was sitting in the living room texting her friends about the movie they planned to see later in the evening when she heard the sound of breaking glass. Britta grabbed a baseball bat that was propped up in the corner and went to investigate. She rounded the corner to the kitchen and noticed broken glass from the door. When Britta turned around, she saw the intruder coming toward her, wielding a baseball bat. To his surprise, she raised the bat and crushed his skull. Britta called 911 and police and paramedics responded within minutes. Unfortunately for the intruder, it wasn’t fast enough and he died before they arrived. what is the mechanism of death?
Answers
Based on the given information, the mechanism of death for the intruder appears to be blunt force trauma to the head, specifically from the baseball bat that Britta used to defend herself. The force of the impact from the bat appears to have caused severe enough injury to result in the intruder's death before medical help could arrive.
Why is mechanism of death important for a case?
The mechanism of death refers to the specific physiological, biochemical, or physical changes that led to an individual's death. Understanding the mechanism of death is important in legal and forensic investigations to determine the cause of death, whether it was due to natural causes, accident, or homicide. The mechanism of death can provide critical evidence to aid in criminal investigations and can be used to support or refute claims made in legal proceedings.
Hence, the answer is, based on the given information, the mechanism of death for the intruder appears to be blunt force trauma to the head, specifically from the baseball bat that Britta used to defend herself.
To learn more about mechanism of death , follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12363103
#SPJ1
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
Answers
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
who rules with the minority or dissents in the supreme court case tinker v. des moines
Answers
The students with their family, who were defended by the ACLU, engaged in a four-year legal dispute that resulted in the historic Supreme Court ruling. Rookie attorney Dan Johnston, who comes from Des Moines and recently graduated from law school, presented the case.
The US Supreme Court ruled in support of the students in a 7-2 ruling in 1969. Students don't give up their civil protections at the campus gates, the high court ruled, agreeing that they should be preserved.
Speaker of the house definition in your own words?
Answers
Hello
I hope you and your family are doing well!
The Speaker of the House is the leader of the House of Representatives, a legislative chamber in the United States Congress. The Speaker of the House is responsible for managing the day-to-day business of the House and ensuring that the rules and procedures of the chamber are followed. The Speaker is elected by the members of the House and serves as a key leader in the legislative process. In this role, the Speaker has significant influence over the agenda of the House and works closely with the Majority Leader to set the legislative schedule. The Speaker also represents the House in its interactions with other branches of government and serves as a spokesperson for the chamber.
----
Please consider rating this answer 5 stars and brainliest if you find it helpful.
Happy Holidays!
Is banning the right for people to buy guns unconstitutional for any age in America?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
In the United States, the right to bear arms is protected by the Second Amendment to the Constitution. This amendment states that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." However, the Second Amendment is not an absolute right and there are certain limitations on the right to bear arms that have been upheld by the courts.
For example, it is not unconstitutional for the government to regulate the sale of firearms to minors or to individuals who are prohibited from owning guns due to criminal convictions or mental illness. It is also not unconstitutional for the government to regulate the types of firearms that can be sold or owned, or to impose licensing requirements on the possession of firearms.
Therefore, it is possible that a ban on the sale of guns to all individuals could be considered unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, depending on the specific circumstances and the way in which the ban is implemented. It is important to note that the constitutionality of such a ban would ultimately be determined by the courts.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The act of banning guns for any age (which is assuming minors that are in question, nor non-naturalized residents or illegal immigrants), is not in itself unconstitutional. However, as the question specifies firstly "buying" as well as the "right", it is under the assumption that, if disregarding the age limit, the person may obtain and use a firearm.
Now, with that aside, banning people from buying guns in any age is not unconstitutional, based on the interpretation of NCJ 160176. Of course, this is taking into account many factors, such as the legitimacy of such a ban and how it's applicable to other rules applied to minors but not adults in normal cases.
For example, in NCJ 161845, it states that the usage of curfew laws outside of full-scale government prohibition (such as in times of war), may apply only to those who are categorized as unsupervised minors, while it may not apply to adults or when adults are present. For example, 394 U.S. 618 limits a unaccompanied/unsupervised minors ability to travel freely, and 11 F.3d 488 upheld curfew ordinances.
Freedom of movement is naturally essential for those who have the ability to use it, and is still allowed to be curfewed for minors, as justifications for minors to not wander the streets is allowed by U.S. culture and laws. Therefore, if the natural can be regulated, then applying bans of obtaining weapons for minors is justifiable as well.
In 554 U.S. 570, it applies that gun safety laws are constitutional and does not disregard the 2nd Amendment. If gun safety laws apply that those under the legal age is not allowed to purchase a firearm based on Public Law 90-618, which states that:
Any firearm or ammunition to any individual who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe is less than eighteen years of age... [U.S. Code 922 Unlawful Acts 5b.1]... it shall be unlawful for any licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector to sell or deliver [to]." [U.S. Code 922 Unlawful Acts 5b].
Therefore, banning the right for people to buy guns that are under the legal adult age is constitutional, though applying the same bans to individuals who meet the requirements to be able to purchase a firearm would be unconstitutional, in denying their 2nd Amendment.
Learn more about the 2nd Amendment and US government laws regarding gun regulations, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29759735
5. Dissenting, Justice Stevens argued against the principle of applying all Bill of Rights provisions to the states, “When a federal court insists that state and local authorities follow its dictates on a matter not critical to personal liberty or procedural justice, the latter may be prevented from engaging in the kind of beneficent ‘experimentation in things social and economic’ that ultimately redounds to the benefit of all Americans.” How would you respond?
Answers
Justice Stevens, through his argument against the principle of applying all provisions of the Bill of Rights to states, is citing the doctrine of Selective Incorporation.
What is the doctrine of Selective Incorporation?It corresponds to a process that was implemented through the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, where the Supreme Court made it possible for each state to incorporate only some parts of some amendments instead of all.
Therefore, according to the doctrine of Selective Incorporation, the Court would only be able to apply a right to state governments, if such right contributed to maintaining social order, equity and the freedom of individuals. Another reason the court would apply a right to states is if that right is grounded in US tradition and history.
Find out more about Selective Incorporation here:
https://brainly.com/question/16995640
#SPJ1
Verify that –(-x) is the same as x , for x = −4/5
Answers
Answer:
-4/5
Explanation:
it came be two possible answer for x
Explanation:
???
-(-x) = -1×(-1×x) = -1×(-1×-4/5) = -1×(4/5) = -4/5
therefore, yes, -(-x) = x
Which is an example of restricted free speech?
promoting an idea that is unpopular with most people
telling everyone you lost your job when you are still employed
revealing a confidential e-mail that was sent to you by mistake
writing an article that urges people to violently protest unfair treatment
Answers
Answer:
D. writing an article that urges people to violently protest unfair treatment
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D.
Writing an article that urges people to violently protest unfair treatment is an example of restricted free speech.
How is freedom of speech restricted right?Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary, and proportionate in order to protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state), or public safety. Prevent disorder or crime.
What do you call a violent protest?Violent protests are sometimes called riots. But the term riot is often extremely loaded and used in a way that's intended to be dismissive of protests and portray protesters as lawless, destructive, or violent.
Learn more about freedom of speech here: brainly.com/question/19203306
#SPJ2
HELP PLEASE I DONT NOW WHAT IT IS
Answers
Answer:
Maybe c) is the answer cuz they didn't take any action regarding this issue
Compare the Bill of Rights from our last unit with the International Human rights Law from
this unit, pick two rights that are in one but not the other and explain why you think this
happened.
Answers
When comparing the Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, with International Human Rights Law, represented primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), there are indeed rights that are present in one but not the other. Two such examples are:
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (in the Bill of Rights, specifically the Second Amendment): This right is not explicitly present in International Human Rights Law, as articulated in the UDHR. The reason for this omission can be attributed to the different historical, cultural, and legal contexts of the United States compared to the international community. The right to bear arms holds significant historical and constitutional significance in the United States due to its association with self-defense, the protection of individual liberties, and the historical context of the American Revolution.The Right to Asylum (in International Human Rights Law, specifically Article 14 of the UDHR): This right is not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights. The absence of this right in the Bill of Rights can be attributed to the fact that the United States Constitution primarily focuses on the relationship between the government and its citizens, whereas the right to asylum relates to the treatment of individuals seeking refuge in a country due to fear of persecution in their home country. Asylum is a concept more closely associated with international law and human rights frameworks, addressing the rights and protections of individuals across borders.These differences highlight how legal documents and frameworks can reflect the unique historical, cultural, and legal contexts of a particular country, shaping the specific rights enshrined within them.For more such questions on Amendments
https://brainly.com/question/458137
#SPJ8
obstacles to public-private partnerships include
Answers
-Lack of trust between public and private sector
-Differences in goals and priorities
-Legal and regulatory constraints
-Lack of transparency and accountability
-Complexity of project financing and risk sharing
-Inefficiencies in procurement and project management processes
-Lack of appropriate investment climate
-Difficulty in measuring and ensuring return on investment.
Write a short note on public-private partnerships.
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are cooperative agreements between government entities and private sector companies aimed at delivering public services and infrastructure. PPPs aim to maximize value for money, transfer risk from the public sector to the private sector, and increase efficiency and innovation in the delivery of public services.
Hence, the answer is,
-Lack of trust between public and private sector
-Differences in goals and priorities
-Legal and regulatory constraints
-Lack of transparency and accountability
-Complexity of project financing and risk sharing
-Inefficiencies in procurement and project management processes
-Lack of appropriate investment climate
-Difficulty in measuring and ensuring return on investment.
To learn more about public-private partnerships, follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/29793109
#SPJ1
who did yall vote for?
Answers
deeznuts2020 bayyybeeee
Answer
Explanation:
Answer
Explanation:
Answer
Explanation:
Answer
Explanation:
Answer
Explanation:
Describe the role of federal courts in checking the power of the legislative branch.
Answers
How are all courts expect the us Supreme Court established
Answers
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal court system separate from individual state courts. It was one of the first acts of the First Congress. President George Washington signed it into law on September 24, 1789.
Research CA state measure (Proposition) 18,22,25, Pick one. Write 3 sentences minimum about how and why you would vote for this one Measure if you could vote.
Plzzzzzz help!!!
Answers
Answer:
Proposition 18: The allowance of 17 year olds to vote in primary elections if they will be 18 by the time of the general election.
Explanation:
I would vote yes for proposition 18 to amend the California constitution to allow 17 year olds the right to vote in the Primary election if the person will be 18 years old by the time of the General election. Many states have adopted this amendment and allow 17 year olds to vote if they meet this standard. This would allow 17 year olds to choose who they can vote for on their general election ballot. I believe it is fair to allow them to vote as they should have a voice in their candidates for the general election.