Answer:
b
Explanation:
Angular, boyish, and with confidence best describes how Donatello's David is depicted. The appropriate response is option B.
How Donatello's David is depicted?Two statues of the biblical figure David by the Italian Early Renaissance sculptor Donatello are titled David. They are a 14th-century or later bronze figure dressed only in a helmet and boots, and an earlier piece in marble depicting a man.
After slaying the giant, David is shown posing with his foot on Goliath's severed head and flashing an enigmatic smile. With the exception of boots and a laurel-topped helmet. He is holding the Goliath sword.
As the artist who restored sculpture to its classical, Greco-Roman roots, Donatello stands out as the representative of classical virtues. David by Donatello is an example of how classical and humanist ideas may coexist with Christian iconography.
To learn more about Donatello's David
https://brainly.com/question/7687478
#SPJ6
Identify words that have a root word similar to that of utilitarianism. How are the definitions of these words related?
Answer:
British philosopher and economist Jeremy Bentham was advocating utilitarianism, or the idea that the goal of society should be “the greatest happiness for the greatest number” of its citizens. To Bentham, all laws or actions should be judged by their “utility.” In other words, did they provide more pleasure or happiness than pain? Bentham strongly supported individual freedom, which he believed guaranteed happiness. Still, he saw the need for government to become involved under certain circumstances.
Explanation:
Which of the following issues contributed to Jefferson's victory in the presidential election of 1800?
- the Federalists' failure to mobilize voters through pamphlets, newspapers, and public meetings
- southern votes made powerful from the three-fifths apportionment of electors
- voter anger over the Alien and Sedition Acts
- Alexander Hamilton's withdrawal from the race
- the passing of the Twelfth Amendment ensuring that electors cast separate votes for Jefferson and his running mate, Aaron Burr
- northern votes from the commercial class
One of the key issues that contributed to Thomas Jefferson's victory in the presidential election of 1800 was voter anger over the Alien and Sedition Acts.
These acts, passed by the Federalist-controlled Congress, were seen as an infringement on individual liberties and free speech rights, particularly in the eyes of the Democratic-Republican Party led by Jefferson. The acts targeted immigrants and restricted criticism of the government, leading to widespread opposition and discontent among voters.
Additionally, another factor that played a significant role in Jefferson's victory was the southern votes made powerful from the three-fifths apportionment of electors. The three-fifths compromise, outlined in the Constitution, counted three-fifths of the enslaved population for the purpose of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives and electoral votes. This gave the southern states, where slavery was prevalent, a greater number of electors and increased their influence in the presidential election.
Furthermore, northern votes from the commercial class also played a role in Jefferson's success. While the commercial class in the North generally leaned toward the Federalist Party, there were divisions and dissatisfaction within their ranks. Some northern merchants and businessmen were frustrated with the economic policies of the Federalists, including their support for protective tariffs that benefited certain industries at the expense of others. This discontent among northern commercial interests contributed to Jefferson's appeal and his ability to garner support in the North.
It's important to note that while the other options mentioned (Federalists' failure to mobilize voters, Hamilton's withdrawal from the race, and the passing of the Twelfth Amendment) had some impact on the election, the issues of voter anger over the Alien and Sedition Acts, southern votes from the three-fifths apportionment, and northern votes from the commercial class were key factors that contributed to Jefferson's victory in the election of 1800.
Learn more about presidential election here
https://brainly.com/question/499460
#SPJ11
In 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This is an example of
was there more to the question heh :D Explanation:
Which question about the mummy is relevant, focused, and feasible?
Who was the first person to find a mummy?
Who built pyramids for Egyptians who were seen as important?
How many mummies have been found over the years?
How important was the person who was mummified believed to be?
Answer:
How important was the person who was mummified believed to be?
Explanation:
Given that a question can be considered relevant, focused, and feasible when it satisfies the unbiased characteristics of the immediate empirical society, which includes elements such as time, scope, resources, expertise, financing, and so on.
Also given that the process of mummifying a body was expensive and the purpose is to preserve the dead body for the afterlife.
Hence, the question about the mummy which is relevant, focused, and feasible is "How important was the person who was mummified believed to be?" This because the question satisfies the factual aspects of the immediate empirical society on the mummy, why they practice it, the time at which they practice it (which is ancient Egypt), and its influence in the society. It also falls within reasonable resources and funding to gather the desirable outcome.
how did political ideas of the enlightenment help shape American politics
The political ideas of the enlightenment help shape American politics because it help in the creation of the separation of powers that was introduced.
How did political ideas of the enlightenment help shape American politics?The Enlightenment beliefs can be seen as on that has a very great impact in the history of the politics in united states of America.
This is because it was able to bring about the creation of the American government with the use separation of powers, since the separation of power help to make the power in the government to go round,m hence political ideas of the enlightenment help shape American politics because it help in the creation of the separation of powers that was introduced.
Learn more about enlightenment at:
https://brainly.com/question/12481854
#SPJ1
NOTE; The question is complete because there is no given option.
Was the Supreme Court justified in its decision in the Korematsu vs. the United States court case?
I need something semi-detailed, as I'm going to be writing a half a page summary about this.
who were the Iroquois were and where did they live?
Answer:
The Iroquois originally lived near Lake Ontario and along the Mohawk River in New York State. Around 1600, five tribes -- the Mohawks, the Oneidas, the Onondagas, the Cayugas, and the Senecas -- banded together to form a confederacy. A sixth tribe, the Tuscaroras, joined in 1722.
Explanation:
how can people adapt to such raid change?
People can adapt to rapid change by evaluating professions, skills, gaining new experiences, increasing mental flexibility, and gradually adapting to the new environment.
History has been a testament to some of the greatest wars, conflicts, rapid transformation of economies, etc. It is therefore necessary to accept that change is inevitable and necessary for growth.
Gaining new skills, understanding the demand-supply dynamics of the new world, and accepting change with an open mind will make adapting easier for people. It is important to not lose hope and continue to strive for excellence, irrespective of the challenges posed by the new system.
Read more adaptations here:
https://brainly.com/question/26755206
The complete question is:
How can people adapt to such rapid change? What types of educational experiences will people need in a changing world? What are some examples of things that have changed suddenly in your own life?
How were the Southern Cultures different from the northern cultures?
Must be 5-7 sentences. I give Brainliest! Please no links
How did Ronald Reagan's presidency change the economic reality
for African Americans?
During Ronald Reagan's presidency, African Americans were not fortunate enough to have any economic gains. In reality, they were some of the most vulnerable people of the era, primarily due to Reagan's adherence to the laissez-faire economic principles that he believed would benefit all people.
However, the economic policies of Ronald Reagan did not take into account the financial challenges that African Americans faced at the time. In essence, his laissez-faire economic policies perpetuated the racial wealth gap, leading to African Americans struggling to make ends meet.African Americans were subjected to marginalization and oppression under Reagan's economic policy, with poverty rates hitting 40 percent. The causes of this were due to Reagan's reluctance to introduce policies that would directly help African Americans.
Reagan believed that by reducing taxes, creating jobs, and stimulating the economy, every American would reap the benefits, including African Americans. Unfortunately, the tax reductions mostly benefitted the wealthy, and it increased the wealth gap. Reaganomics ensured the rich became richer, and the poor got poorer.
In conclusion, Reagan's economic policy exacerbated the economic crisis for African Americans. African Americans experienced a double disadvantage of economic inequality and racial discrimination. Reagan's policies had minimal impact on the African American population as they remained economically vulnerable.
To know more about economic visit :
https://brainly.com/question/32861646
#SPJ11
The last war for independence from European colonial rule on the African continent was between
Answer: The last war for independence from European colonial rule on the African continent was between South Africa and the United Kingdom
Option D is correct .
Where was the last European colony in Africa?
Namibia became the youngest country in the world when South Africa officially relinquished control shortly after midnight today (5am ET Tuesday). Thus ended the era of colonial rule on a continent that was once fragmented and ruled by imperial glory-hungry European powers.
Which European country fought for Africa?
Of these 14 countries, France, Germany, Great Britain and Portugal were the major players at the conference, controlling much of colonial Africa at the time. Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Spain vie for power in Europe's power politics.
When did European countries leave Africa?
Between 1945 and 1960, 30 new states in Asia and Africa gained autonomy or full independence from European colonists. There was no decolonization process. In some areas it was peaceful and orderly. In many other countries, independence was achieved only after protracted revolutions.
pls mark brainliest
which of the following is true of white and chinese railroad workers in the 1800s? group of answer choices labor market competition between white and chinese workers fueled lynching of chinese workers. none are true federal legislation purposefully restricted entry of chinese laborers into the u.s. both are true
Which of the following is true of white and Chinese railroad workers in the 1800s? Among the given choices, both statements are true.
First, labor market competition between white and Chinese workers fueled the lynching of Chinese workers. Chinese immigrants were often hired as cheap labor, which led to tensions with white workers who felt threatened by the competition for jobs. This tension contributed to incidents of violence and discrimination against Chinese workers, including lynching.
Second, federal legislation purposefully restricted the entry of Chinese laborers into the U.S. This is evidenced by the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which was the first significant law that restricted immigration into the United States based on nationality.
The Act suspended Chinese immigration for ten years and declared Chinese immigrants ineligible for naturalization as American citizens. The purpose of this legislation was to limit the number of Chinese laborers entering the country, thus reducing competition in the labor market and easing tensions between white and Chinese workers.
In conclusion, both the labor market competition between white and Chinese workers fueling lynching of Chinese workers and the federal legislation purposefully restricting entry of Chinese laborers into the U.S. are true statements about the situation of white and Chinese railroad workers in the 1800s.
To know more about Chinese railroad refer here
https://brainly.com/question/30587627#
#SPJ11
when abraham lincoln blockaded southern ports and issued the emancipation proclamation without congressional approval, he was making use of
When Abraham Lincoln blockaded Southern ports and issued the Emancipation Proclamation without congressional approval, he was making use of his executive powers as President and employing wartime measures to suppress the Confederacy and advance the cause of ending slavery.
When Abraham Lincoln blockaded southern ports and issued the Emancipation Proclamation without congressional approval, he was making use of his powers as the President of the United States during a time of war. As Commander-in-Chief, Lincoln had the authority to take necessary actions to preserve the Union and to suppress the rebellion. The blockade was a military tactic aimed at weakening the Confederacy's economy and ability to import and export goods. The Emancipation Proclamation, while not immediately freeing all slaves, was a symbolic move to declare that the Union was fighting for the end of slavery as well as the preservation of the nation.
Learn More about Emancipation here :-
https://brainly.com/question/29788953
#SPJ11
Was the The National Industrial Recovery Act [NIRA or NRA] (1933) successful? Why or Why not?
Answer:
Finally, unhappy labor union representatives fought with little success for the collective bargaining promised by the NIRA. The codes did little to help recovery, and by raising prices, they actually made the economic situation worse.
Explanation:
which was not a consequence of the protestant reformation? responses belief in predestination belief in predestination the rise of nation-states
No, the rise of nation-states was not a consequence of the Protestant Reformation(c).
The Protestant Reformation was a religious movement that began in the 16th century in Europe and challenged the authority of the Catholic Church. The movement led to the formation of Protestant denominations, such as Lutheranism and Calvinism, which were based on the teachings of Martin Luther and John Calvin, respectively.
The rise of nation-states, on the other hand, can be traced back to the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. This treaty ended the Thirty Years’ War and established the principle of sovereignty for nation-states.
The treaty also recognized the idea of national borders, which had previously been unfamiliar concepts. In addition, the treaty allowed for the formation of alliances between nation-states, which allowed for the emergence of powerful states such as France and Spain.
Therefore, the rise of nation-states was not a consequence of the Protestant Reformation.
For more questions like Protestant click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/14207768
#SPJ4
What were the thinkers of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries called?
Answer:
The Renaissance
Explanation:
The Renaissance is an important event in European history that stretched from the 14th century to the 17th century. It was preceded by the Middle Ages in Europe and eventually led to the major events of the Age of Enlightenment.
Answer:
Renaissance philosophers
The crowds wept when Jesus was crucified.
True or False
Answer:
True ( I hope this was helpful) >;D
Answer:
True The crowds wept when Jesus was crucified.
How does Kipling describe the conquered people?
Answer:
subjugated but deservingly so as they are "Half devil and half child"
Explanation:
are there any time where fred hamptons speaches have cause riots
Answer:
Fred Hampton, a prominent activist, and leader in the Black Panther Party, was known for his powerful speeches advocating for social justice and equality. While his speeches were influential and mobilized many individuals, there is no documented evidence to suggest that his speeches directly caused riots.
It's important to note that Hampton's activism and speeches were focused on addressing systemic issues of racism, poverty, and inequality, and promoting community organizing and empowerment. However, he faced intense scrutiny and surveillance from law enforcement agencies, which eventually led to his assassination in 1969.
While his speeches may have been seen as provocative by some, it is important to recognize that riots or violent actions that may have occurred during that time were often a result of broader societal tensions, systemic oppression, and a response to ongoing racial injustices, rather than directly caused by Hampton's speeches alone.
How were the estates unequal?
Answer:
The causes of the French Revolution were that the Estate System was unfair, the government of France was into much debt, and was therefore taxing too much, and that people resented the power of the Church. The third estate was overtaxed because the government was in debt. ... This caused the third estate to demand reform.
Hope this helps:)
As a result of the treaty, Germany lost territory to
Answer:
United States, USSR ( Russia), France and Great Britain
Explanation:
Why did Luther refuse to take back what he had written about the Church?
Answer:
Luther refused to take back what he had written about the Church because he believed that his ideas were based on the Bible and that the Church's teachings were corrupt and in need of reform. He also believed that he had a duty to speak out against what he saw as wrongdoing within the Church.
Explanation:
Which two statements explain the passage of the Fair Housing Act on April 11, 1968?
Answer:
The Fair Housing Act was passed on April 11, 1968, as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. It was designed to address discrimination in the housing market based on race, color, national origin, and religion. Two statements that explain the passage of the Fair Housing Act are:
1. The Fair Housing Act was a response to the civil rights movement and the ongoing struggle for racial equality in the United States. The act was passed in the wake of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who had been a leading voice in the movement for racial justice. The passage of the Fair Housing Act was seen as an important step towards ending housing discrimination and promoting greater social and economic equality for all Americans.
2. The Fair Housing Act was the result of years of activism and advocacy by civil rights groups, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE). These groups had been working to end housing discrimination for many years, and had organized numerous protests, boycotts, and other actions to raise awareness of the issue. The passage of the Fair Housing Act was a major victory for these groups, and represented a significant milestone in the ongoing struggle for civil rights in the United States.
One reason farmers had trouble paying their bills in the 1920s was because
A. farm productivity had decreased as a result of World War I.
B. banks refused to lend money to farmers following World War I.
C. the demand for crops dropped after World War I.
D. the size of farms had decreased after World War I.
One reason farmers had trouble paying their bills in the 1920s was because farm productivity had decreased as a result of World War I. The Option A is correct.
What trouble do American Farmers experience during World War I?During World War I, American farmers were tasked with producing as much food as possible. The war increased the need for both European allies and the US military. The demand was so great that farming families were asked to eat the food they grew rather than buy it from the store.
Farmers were encouraged to borrow money in order to buy more land and equipment. In 1916, Congress passed the Federal Farm Loan Act. This legislation established federal banks dedicated to lending to farmers. Post-war relief efforts kept demand for agricultural exports from the United States high until 1919. However, once the allied countries' economies stabilized, demand fell precipitously. Farmers in the United States were saddled with crippling debt that they were unable to repay.
Read more about farm productivity
brainly.com/question/20970322
#SPJ1
1. What did the Russian duke think motivated the Mongols?
(A) The Mongols were interested primarily in seizing wealth rather
than in controlling Russian territory.
(B) The Mongols choose their tactics in warfare because those tacitces
were used in fairy tales.
(C) The Mongols believed they could fool foes with rumors of
atrocities.
(D) The Mongols wanted to be thought of as honorable warriors.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. This is shown in the first three sentences of the passage
Explanation:
The Russian Duke most likely believed that (A) The Mongols were interested primarily in seizing wealth rather than in controlling Russian territory.
In the early 13th century, the Mongols invaded Russia, defeated their opponents, and then retreated.
This was unlike the Mongols and led many, including a Russian Duke to assume that they invaded for wealth rather than for land.
The other options are wrong because:
Mongols did not choose their tactics based on fairy tales as they were quite brutal. Mongols did not need to fool people with rumors of atrocities as their atrocities were real and well documented Mongols did not care what kind of warriors they were thought of and even if they did, their conduct did not show this.In conclusion, the Russian Duke believed that the Mongols had invaded Russia to gain wealth and not land as they usually did.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/18868214.
Two of America's Founding Fathers didn't sign the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson was representing his country in Great Britain and John Adams was doing the same in France
Is this statement correct
Answer:
No this isn't correct Statement
Explanation:
Here is the correct Statement:
Two of America's Founding Fathers didn't sign the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson was representing his country in France and John Adams was doing the same in Great Britain.
2. Why were the Portuguese able to conquer and control coastal cities?
the members of opec were trying to agree to cut production so they could save more oil for the future. opec was unable to agree on cutting production because each country has an incentive to cheat on any agreement. T/F?
True, the members of OPEC were trying to agree to cut production so they could save more oil for the future. OPEC was unable to agree on cutting production because each country has an incentive to cheat on any agreement.
The main reason behind this is the "prisoner's dilemma" situation, in which each country wants to maximize its own benefits. By cheating on the agreement, a country can continue to produce and sell more oil, gaining higher revenues while the other members reduce their production.
This creates a competitive advantage for the cheating country, as it can enjoy higher profits while benefiting from the reduced supply and increased prices in the market due to the overall cut in production.
Additionally, countries may have different economic needs and political agendas, which can make reaching a consensus on production cuts difficult. Some countries might be more reliant on oil revenues for their national budgets, making them less willing to cut production and potentially lose revenue.
In conclusion, the inability of OPEC members to agree on cutting production stems from individual incentives to cheat on the agreement, the prisoner's dilemma situation, and varying economic needs and political agendas.
Each country seeks to maximize its own benefits, making it difficult to reach a consensus on production cuts aimed at saving more oil for the future.
To know more about members of OPEC refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9517610#
#SPJ11
In your opinion, is the government abiding Carson’s call? Write an argument essay (of at least 500 words) that uses evidence to support whether or not current pesticide use reflects Carson's call for the "selective and intelligent use of chemicals." Be sure to cite your sources, and provide a reference page for those sources.
Current pesticide use does not adhere to Carson's Call for the careful and rational use of pesticides. Because of ineffective government regulation of pesticide use, it has had a detrimental impact on the environment.
"Selective and clever use of chemicals" definition.The dangers of pesticide use were made clear in Rachel Carson's book "Silent Spring," which also urged the "selective and sensible use of pesticides." It is important to assess whether Carson's recommendation has been followed by the government more than 50 years after it was published. This essay makes the case that current pesticide usage does not follow Carson's advice to use chemicals carefully and wisely.
According to Carson, using pesticides has unintended effects on the environment and human health. She specifically emphasized the detrimental effects DDT had on bird populations and how persistent it was in the environment, posing health risks to both people and wildlife. Carson maintained that pesticides should only be used sparingly and when absolutely required.
To know more about Carson visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28888911
#SPJ1
How do you think new election campaign methods affected American democracy? I need this real quick!!
Answer: The rise of new election campaign methods, particularly the increased use of social media and data analytics, has had a significant impact on American democracy. On the one hand, these methods have increased the reach and accessibility of political campaigns, allowing candidates to connect with voters in new and innovative ways. They have also enabled campaigns to more effectively target specific demographics and tailor their messages to individual voters.
However, there are also concerns about the impact of these new methods on democracy. Some argue that the increased use of social media and data analytics has led to the spread of disinformation and fake news, which can undermine the integrity of elections and erode trust in democratic institutions. Additionally, there are concerns about the role of money in politics, with some arguing that the increasing cost of political campaigns gives wealthy individuals and special interest groups an outsized influence on the political process.
Overall, while new election campaign methods have the potential to enhance democracy by increasing accessibility and improving outreach, there are also risks and concerns that must be addressed in order to ensure the integrity of the electoral process and protect the democratic values that underpin American society.
Explanation: