The major country that strongly resisted calls to implement democracy while much of the rest of the world embraced it in the twentieth century is the Soviet Union (USSR).
The Soviet Union, officially known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), was a socialist state that emerged after the Russian Revolution in 1917. The Soviet government, under the leadership of the Communist Party, embraced a different ideology and political system than that of liberal democracy. While democracy spread across many parts of the world during the twentieth century, the Soviet Union maintained a firm opposition to democratic principles and instead advocated for a centralized, one-party rule.
The Soviet Union established a totalitarian regime that emphasized state control, planned economy, and the dominance of the Communist Party. The government suppressed political opposition, restricted civil liberties, and tightly controlled all aspects of society. The Soviet leadership justified their resistance to democracy by promoting the concept of "proletarian dictatorship" and the need for a planned socialist economy. The centralized power structure and the ideology of the Communist Party were seen as incompatible with the principles of democracy, and the Soviet Union resisted calls for democratization throughout its existence until its dissolution in 1991.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/30078994
#SPJ11
What is idleness and leisure? ( best answer gets s brainliest, please do not copy from the internet directly)
Answer:
Idleness and leisure refer to a state of free time in which a person has the opportunity to enjoy life's simple pleasures. This includes activities like taking a break from work, spending time outdoors, or pursuing any hobbies or interests that one may have. Leisure is often seen as an important part of leading a healthy, fulfilled lifestyle, as it allows for relaxation, creativity, exploration and social connections.
1、Explain why the Malaysian Tin mining industry collapsed in the
late 1980.
Hurry up and tell me what all the answers are! There
are two minutes left to hand in the homework! hurry
up!
The Malaysian Tin mining industry collapsed due to many reasons. Some of them are- competition from other countries, lower demand , inadequate technology, environmental concerns and Government policies.
The Malaysian tin mining industry collapsed due to several factors that contributed to the economic downfall of the industry.
1) Competition from other countries: The global tin market faced stiff competition from other countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Bolivia, and Thailand. These countries had abundant tin reserves, and their mining processes were more efficient than those of Malaysia, making it challenging for Malaysia to compete.
2) Lower demand: The demand for tin had reduced globally due to the development of substitute materials like aluminum, which had similar properties to tin but was cheaper and lighter.
3) Inadequate technology: The Malaysian tin mining industry relied on old and inefficient methods of mining that consumed too much time and resources. Moreover, the industry was characterized by widespread corruption and low productivity, which further reduced the competitiveness of Malaysia's tin production.
4) Environmental concerns: The mining industry in Malaysia had severe environmental consequences, which led to public outcry, forcing the government to impose strict environmental regulations. The regulations, coupled with the high cost of compliance, made it difficult for the mining industry to operate, leading to a decline in production.
5) Government policies: The Malaysian government had over-regulated the mining industry, which stifled innovation and productivity.
Moreover, government policies were inconsistent, and there was a lack of transparency in the regulatory framework. This led to a lack of investor confidence, making it difficult for the industry to attract investments and expand.
Overall, the combination of factors like competition from other countries, lower demand , inadequate technology, environmental concerns and Government policies led to the collapse of the Malaysian tin mining industry, resulting in significant economic losses for the country.
know more about tin mining industry here,
https://brainly.com/question/32569577
#SPJ11
During the Civil War, Texas troops serving in the
Trans-Mississippi department helped to defend
which area?
A. Virginia
B. Louisiana
C. Red River
D. Sabine Pass
Answer:
maaf kalo salah red river
During the 1760s in Britain Charles Townsend served as
Answer:
RIGHT chancellor of the exchequer.
Explanation:
Hope this help - Good Luck!
Answer:
Right chancellor of the exchequer.
Conservation of angular momentum slows a cloud's collapse a. equally in all directions. b. only when the cloud is not rotating initially. c. mostly along
Answer:
C) mostly along
Explanation:
Conservation of angular momentum slows a cloud's collapse mostly along.
4. Explain two ways in which the Ka'aba is important in the Muslim Hajj (pilgrimage).
Refer to scripture or sacred writings in your answer. (5 marks)
Give your own position on gender based violence in South Africa.
Violence is an activity that should be condemned because no reason is sufficient to justify it.
What is gender violence?Gender-based violence is a term that refers to the violence exerted by a person or a group against an individual or group based on their gender.
Gender violence is a manifestation that has mainly affected women throughout history. An example of this is the gender violence that existed in South Africa against women.
According to the above, it can be inferred that violence is a harmful activity for society, that is why no type of violence should be exercised.
Learn more about violence in: https://brainly.com/question/8075105
#SPJ1
Stamp Act
Intolerable Acts
Boston Massacre
Boston Tea Party
Which would make the BEST title for a research paper covering these topics?
"The Road to Revolution: Examining the Impact of the Stamp Act, Intolerable Acts, Boston Massacre, and Boston Tea Party"
What is the Stamp Act?
Generally, The Stamp Act was a tax imposed by the British government on all American colonists in 1765. It required them to pay a tax on all paper documents, including legal documents, licenses, newspapers, and even playing cards.
This act was one of the first examples of taxation without representation and was met with strong resistance from the colonists. It was eventually repealed in 1766.
Read more about Stamp Act
https://brainly.com/question/29740449
#SPJ1
How can you encourage a young child to accept a variety of foods from the protein group?
The best way for your child to learn to eat and enjoy new foods is to copy you. Try to eat with them as often as you can. Give small portions and praise your child for eating, even if they only eat a little. If your child rejects the food, do not force them to eat it.
Describe Confucius and his four most important virtues.
make it as simple as possible pls im so dum
Answer:
Explanation:
Confucius was an influential Chinese philosopher who lived around 2,500 years ago. He emphasized the importance of ethical behavior, social harmony, and respect for authority. Confucius believed that individuals could create a peaceful and just society by cultivating certain virtues in themselves and practicing them in their daily lives.The four most important virtues taught by Confucius are:Ren (benevolence or compassion): This virtue emphasizes kindness, empathy, and concern for others. It encourages treating others with respect and seeking to understand their perspectives and needs.
Yi (righteousness or justice): Yi involves doing what is morally right and just. It stresses the importance of honesty, integrity, and fairness in all actions and decisions.
Li (propriety or etiquette): Li refers to proper behavior and manners. It involves observing social norms, showing respect for elders and authority, and maintaining harmonious relationships within society.
Zhi (wisdom or knowledge): Zhi emphasizes the pursuit of knowledge and self-cultivation. It involves seeking understanding, reflecting on experiences, and constantly learning and growing intellectually.
Confucius believed that by practicing these virtues, individuals could contribute to a harmonious society and bring about positive change in themselves and others.
_____ illness is long-term, often lifelong, and requires long-term, if not life-term, management.
Chronic illness is long-term, often lifelong, and requires long-term, if not life-term, management.
Chronic illnesses are conditions that persist over an extended period, typically for the rest of a person's life. They can include diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, arthritis, and cancer. These conditions often involve complex and ongoing treatment plans that are tailored to the individual's specific needs.
Long-term management of chronic illness focuses on various aspects, including maintaining overall health, managing symptoms, and preventing complications. This may involve medication, therapy, lifestyle changes, and regular medical check-ups.
Proper management is crucial for individuals living with chronic illnesses, as it can help improve their quality of life and reduce the risk of further health issues.
In addition, people with chronic illnesses may require ongoing support from healthcare professionals, family members, and friends to help them navigate their condition and adapt to any limitations it may impose on their daily lives. Support systems play a crucial role in maintaining mental and emotional well-being, which can directly impact physical health.
To sum up, chronic illnesses are long-term and often lifelong conditions that require a comprehensive, long-term management approach. This involves addressing various aspects of the condition, from medical treatments to lifestyle adjustments, as well as relying on support systems to improve overall well-being.
Proper management is essential for enhancing the quality of life and preventing further complications in individuals living with chronic illnesses.
To know more about Chronic illness, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30824111#
#SPJ11
Imagine that you are the principal of a school and you just found out that
there was a fight in the lunchroom during lunch. You’ve asked many
students and teachers who witnessed the fight to write down what they
saw and who they think started the fight. Unfortunately, you have
received many conflicting accounts that disagree not only as to who
started the fight, but also as to who was involved and when the fight even
started. It’s important to remember that NO ONE is just plain lying.
What are the different types of people who might have seen this
fight? (e.g., friends of those involved versus people who don’t
know the kids who were fighting; those who were fighting versus
those who were witnesses, adults versus kids)
The types of people who might have seen the fight might include friends of those involved, other teachers, students, and non-teaching staff
It is important to note here that even though any of the observants might not be lying, they might have certain biases that prevent them from saying the complete truth.
For example, the friends of those involved might be writing in a way that protects their friends and portrays other students as perpetrators of the violence. Some other students who weren't directly involved in the incident might genuinely have clouded memory and a faded recollection of what actually unfolded. Likewise, the teachers might have seen the event later and formed their opinion.
For more answers on school fights please refer to: https://brainly.com/question/28597194?referrer=searchResults
It can be for love, family, power, freedom, sacrifice, and pride are one of the many reasons to fight. Also, different circumstances can cause people to fight. Things like oppression, race, and culture can cause conflict among people.
What is the meaning of a Fight?
As "provide resistance, struggle," as well as "to quarrel, argue, or cause a commotion" from around 1200. As "be in dispute" from the late 14c. From the Fight of the 1690s.
The Proto-Indo-European prefix peak, which means "to pluck out," is where the word fight's earliest roots are found. This makes perfect sense if you picture a hair-pulling argument.
One of the many reasons to battle may be for love, family, power, freedom, sacrifice, or pride. Additionally, various situations can lead to conflict. Conflicts between groups of people can be sparked by issues like oppression, race, religion culture.
Learn more about the Fight here:
https://brainly.com/question/11959141
#SPJ1
"It is interesting that despite his having avowed that his gambling addiction had been cured, he still spends a lot of time in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, and Monte Carlo." Which of the following rhetorical devices is at work in this example?
a. Euphemism
b. Rhetorical Defiintion
c.innuendo
d. paralipsis
e. Paralipsis/Apophasis
The rhetorical device that is at work in this example is "paralipsis."Paralipsis (or apophasis) is a rhetorical device that entails emphasizing something by pretending to exclude or ignore it
. This device is used to present something in a suggestive manner rather than a direct manner.A rhetorical device is a technique that a writer employs to communicate a message effectively. Rhetoric refers to the art of persuading people by using language in a specific manner. The writer employs various rhetorical devices to persuade the reader/listener. Despite his having avowed that his gambling addiction had been cured, he still spends a lot of time in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, and Monte Carlo. The example uses paralipsis because it deliberately draws attention to something without addressing it straightforwardly.
To know more about Atlantic visit;
brainly.com/question/31251342
#SPJ11
call him a clown
lena supporting violet
imagine you hear a sound in your house while you are sleeping at night. you ask yourself, is someone breaking in, or has your careless roommate dropped a drinking glass? the first interpretation/evaluation of that stimulus evokes fear, while the second evokes anger. this is an example of which theory?
This is an example of the "Appraisal Theory."The Appraisal Theory suggests that our emotional reactions to events or stimuli are determined by how we evaluate or interpret those events. In this case, the interpretation of the sound as a break-in leads to fear, while the interpretation of the sound as your roommate's carelessness leads to anger.
Learn more about Appraisal Theory: https://brainly.com/question/31359088
#SPJ11
SUMMARY statement: for economic activity in China from the 1950s through the 2000s?
From 2008 to 2010, China's real GDP growth averaged 9.7%. However, the rate of GDP growth declined slowed for the next six consecutive years, falling from 10.6% in 2010 to 6.7% in 2016. Real GDP ticked up to 6.8% in 2017, but slowed to 6.6% in 2018, (although it rose to 6.8% in 2017).
answer the following question in at least two sentences. in your opinion is it important for citizens to vote why or why not?
Answer: maybe because they could be winning for there country that is in a war . they could be voting for something new
Explanation:
PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELP ME I BEGGING YOUI GOING FAIL IF I DON'T GET THIS WORK DONE
what are two inferences that you can make about what the culture was like in the Southern Colonies society?
C. Checks and Balances. The Constitution gives Congress certain enumerated powers so that it branch (the President). How do you think these checks balance power in the government? can check the power of our other branches of government. The chart shows checks on the executive Legislative Check How does it balance power in the government? Approves treaties Approves presidential appointments Impeaches and tries federal officers Overrides a president's veto Controls the budget Name: The house and serate each vote on the compromise bill bill bocomes a law. Read through it before mov
The US Constitution's checks and balances system enables each part of government to set limits on the authority of the others, preventing any one branch from gaining excessive power.
What does each component of American government get to do thanks to checks and balances?Each department of government is given its own authority to check the other branches and prevent any one branch from becoming overly powerful thanks to the checks and balances system.
In a system of checks and balances, how are the various government agencies held in check and under control?The government has a checks and balances mechanism to ensure that one branch does not become more powerful than the others. This method gives each branch the authority to monitor the other two branches.
To know more about government visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/2364368
#SPJ1
why are human beings called social animals please help me .
Explanation:
zmlzlslspdoelenebebebebebdd
winston churchill thought his voice was weak, and he suffered from stage fright that he overcame by:
A rhombus is a quadrilateral with four congruent sides. a special type of rhombus with four right angles. In other words, all squares are rhombuses, but not all rhombuses are squares.
Here is a table that summarizes the key differences between rhombuses and squares:
| Property | Rhombus | Square |
|---|---|---|
| Sides | All sides are congruent | All sides are congruent |
| Angles | Opposite angles are congruent | All angles are right angles |
| Diagonals | Diagonals bisect each other at right angles | Diagonals bisect each other at right angles and are perpendicular to each other |
Here are some examples of rhombuses and squares:
* Rhombus: A rhombus with side length 5 cm and opposite angles of 72 degrees.
* Square: A square with side length 5 cm.
Learn more about quadrilateral here:
https://brainly.com/question/29934440
#SPJ11
1. What does the graph show about unemployment among African Americans compared to unemployment in the total population? What can you infer about unemployment among whites?
Answer:
African Americans are at a greater disadvantage than Whites to get a job...
Explanation:
Read the Economist Magazine article, down below.
Then answer the following questions;
Do the authors of this paper make statements that conflict with key points in Chapter 5 of the text? Explain.
The research referred to in the article finds that: ethical standards slip when times are tough, bribery is a solid investment, and bribes are higher when government institutions are weak and there is lower newspaper circulation. Do you believe ethical standards may vary depending upon the situation? In other words, is it okay to be unethical in order to win business, enter a new market, get a promotion, avoid criticism from one’s boss, etc. or, is an unethical act unethical no matter what the circumstances? Explain your answer.
Do you believe ethical standards vary from culture to culture? If so, then how does one deal with business transactions across different cultures?
BRIBERY is very hard to stamp out. In a global fraud survey by Ernst & Young, a professional- services firm, 39% of businesses say corruption is common in countries where they operate. Corporate standards are more liable to slip when times are tough: 15% of surveyed firms think cash payments to win business can be justified if they help companies to survive an economic downturn, compared with 9% last year. One in 20 think the same of misstating their financial performance.
Bribery would be less of a problem if it wasn't also a solid investment. A new paper by Raghavendra Rau of Cambridge University and Yan Leung Chung and Aris Stouraitis of the Hong Kong Baptist University examines 166 high-profile cases of bribery since 1971, covering payments made in 52 countries by firms listed on 20 different stock markets. Bribery offered an average return of 10-11 times the value of the bung paid out to win a contract, measured by the jump in stock market value when the contract was won. America's Department of Justice found similarly high returns in cases it has prosecuted.
Returns depend on which officials are having their palms greased. Higher-ranking officials get bigger bribes not only in cash terms but also as a proportion of the value of the contracts they dish out, with heads of state securing up to 4.7% of the contract value compared with just 1.2% for low-ranking officials. Senior officials also capture more of the benefit from graft, typically taking over 50% of the returns from contracts they hand out; their subordinates capture just 20% of the value.
The size of bribes is also affected by the institutional set-up in each country. Cash bribes are bigger in poorer countries with larger armed forces and higher customs burdens. The authors suggest such countries typically have weaker institutions and less constrained government officials. Bribers pay more, both in cash terms and as a share of project value, when there is lower newspaper circulation at home.
Not all dirty money is spent equally well. The authors find that firms with better overall financial performance outperform in this area, too, getting better value for their bribes. Returns are also higher where overall levels of bribery are held down by greater disclosure and director liability, perhaps because such scrutiny deters entry into the bribe-paying market by other firms. The problem is getting caught. Another paper, by Jonathan Karpoff of the University of Washington, Scott Lee of Texas A&M University and Gerald Martin of American University, found that American firms facing bribery-enforcement action lose 9% of their market value, mostly because they have other problems with misrepresentation and fraud.
The authors of the Economist article and the authors of the text do not make statements that conflict with key points in Chapter 5 of the text. Both sources discuss the issue of ethical standards in business, and the ways in which bribery and corruption can impact the behavior of companies and individuals.
However, the Economist article focuses specifically on the economic returns of bribery, while the text discusses the broader ethical implications of unethical behavior in business. Therefore, there are no conflicting statements in these sources.
Regarding the question about whether ethical standards may vary depending upon the situation, the text suggests that there is a gray area in which ethical decisions can be difficult. However, it also argues that there are certain ethical principles that should be upheld in all situations, such as respect for others and adherence to the law.
In terms of cultural differences in ethical standards, the text notes that different cultures may have different norms and values regarding honesty and integrity. It suggests that businesses should be aware of these differences and take them into account when operating in different countries.
Regarding bribery, the text argues that it is never acceptable to engage in unethical behavior, regardless of the circumstances. It notes that there are legal and financial risks associated with bribery, and that it can damage a company's reputation and long-term success.
Overall, the text and the Economist article both emphasize the importance of ethical behavior in business, and the potential risks and consequences of unethical behavior.
Learn more about Economist Visit : brainly.com/question/26368181
#SPJ11
A social learning theorist believes that cognition is __________. a. unimportant to explaining behavioral outcomes and processes b. one of the keys to understanding behavioral outcomes c. used only before conditioning takes place d. capable of being directly observed, tested, and verified please select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
One of the keys to understanding behavioral outcomes ( Option B ). Cognition, in the opinion of a social learning theorist, is one of the keys to understanding behavioral outcomes.
- More about cognition according to social learning theorists :
- By acknowledging cognitive elements and the part they play in deciding whether to replicate behavior, social learning theory explains complicated behavior. It does not, however, take into consideration the fact that we generate a variety of behaviors based on our ideas and feelings.
- Consider a period when you picked up a skill or a behavior by watching someone else. For instance, you might have picked up altruistic traits from observing your parents give food to a homeless person or picked up dog-training skills from watching The Dog Whisperer.
To know more about cognition, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/26425192?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
The framers of the Constitution designed the Senate to filter the output of the sometimes hasty House. Do you think this was a wise idea? Why or why not?
Do you agree or disagree to the following paragraph? explain why?
When the framers first wrote the Constitution, their ideal was to build a government that was different from the one-man-ruled King tyrannical structure of England that the people of the United States had been subjected to for many years. The goal was that no one singular power would be in existence for their citizens. This was not an easy task for the framers and through the failure of the Articles of Confederation, the Great Compromise and Bicameralism were introduced, hence the House and Senate were born.
I do believe that it was and is necessary for our government process to be set up as it was. It allows for checks and balances or accounting from one branch of government to another. It essentially means that all branches have to be on the same page for issues, agendas, and laws to go forward. Sometimes this takes great compromise from all branches. It is a balancing of the issue for the greater good of the American people. Filter or moderate no one man or group has ultimate power or authority to govern alone.
The framers of the Constitution designed the Senate to filter the output of the sometimes hasty House. This idea was wise because the Senate is a deliberative body that was created to be more stable and mature than the House. The Senate was also meant to be more responsive to the will of the people than the House.
The framers of the Constitution designed the Senate to filter the output of the sometimes hasty House. This idea was wise because the Senate is a deliberative body that was created to be more stable and mature than the House. The Senate was also meant to be more responsive to the will of the people than the House.
The Senate is a deliberative body that is intended to be more thoughtful and careful than the House. The Senate is also more representative of the interests of the states than the House. The Senate has the power to advise and consent on presidential appointments, ratify treaties, and try impeachments. The Senate is also responsible for confirming federal judges and justices.
The House of Representatives is designed to be more responsive to the will of the people than the Senate. The House is also more representative of the interests of the people than the Senate. The House is responsible for introducing all revenue bills, impeaching federal officials, and selecting the President in the event of a tie in the Electoral College.
The Senate and the House were designed to work together to create a balanced and responsive government. The framers of the Constitution recognized that no single branch of government could be trusted to govern alone. The Senate and the House were designed to check and balance each other so that the interests of the states and the people could be represented equally.
Learn more about federal judges: https://brainly.com/question/31448478
#SPJ11
An increase in subjective well-being was linked to what social living arrangement?.
An increase in subjective well-being was linked to social living arrangements in marriage.
A dwelling association is virtually wherein an incapacity advantage applicant lives or resides. Examples include an owned or rented domestic, apartment, or institution inclusive of a nursing domestic.
It's far how a social structure, or a society, is organized - or greater precisely, some a part of how it's miles organized, or how a few a part of it is arranged. it is arguing that any such arrangement this is vitally social/shared, needs to by means of that nature be educative (or academic).
Despite the fact that nuclear households appear to be on the decline, 2016 U.S. Census records indicate that 69% of kids nevertheless stay in nuclear families. although it does not always work out that manner, to most people this is an appropriate family surrounding to raise children in.
Learn more about social living arrangements here:
https://brainly.com/question/14058158
#SPJ4
Paul Revere was a central figure in the colonial ___ network.
factory
spy
political
artillery
shipping
Answer: figure in the colonial *Spy* Network
Answer:
b) spy
Explanation:
I just took the test :)
Which of the following choices is not an operational definition for a funny joke?
A: duration of time (in seconds) spent laughing during a one minute comedy skit.
B: ratings on a scale from zero (not funny) to five (very funny).
C: the extent to which a joke or comment causes laughter
The choice that is not an operational definition for a funny joke is "ratings on a scale from zero (not funny) to five (very funny)."
Operational definitions provide clarity and consistency when using terms in research and experiments. They define a concept in measurable terms to ensure everyone involved understands the concept in the same way. Operational definitions for a funny joke would describe the measurable aspects of humor that could be used to quantify and measure the funniness of the joke. For instance, "the duration of time (in seconds) spent laughing during a one-minute comedy skit" and "the extent to which a joke or comment causes laughter."
Option B, "ratings on a scale from zero (not funny) to five (very funny)" is not an operational definition. It does not describe a measurable quality of humor. Ratings are subjective and can vary from person to person, depending on personal preferences and experiences. Consequently, ratings are not an effective measure of the objective funniness of a joke. It is therefore not an operational definition for a funny joke.
Learn more about operational definition:
https://brainly.com/question/17212194
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP WILL MARK AS BRAINLIST!!!! ☘️
How did Muslim scholars benefit West African kings?
A. They made large tax payments to the Malian kings.
B. They served as administrators and provided legal expertise.
C. They introduced the concept of law codes to Africa.
D. They provided intelligence on the weaknesses of Islamic states.
Answer:
B África never did law codes
hope it helps
Which is an example of a social policy?
ОА.
federal standards regarding overtime pay
OB.
deploying armed forces to another country
O C.
increasing the federal interest rate
OD. negotiating an international peace treaty
The example of a social policy is federal standards regarding overtime pay. Option A is the correct answer.
Social policies are government actions and programs designed to address social issues and improve the well-being of individuals and communities. They are aimed at promoting social justice, equality, and the overall welfare of society. Option A is the correct answer.
Federal standards regarding overtime pay are an example of a social policy because they are regulations set by the government to ensure fair compensation for employees who work more than a certain number of hours per week. These standards are put in place to protect workers' rights, prevent exploitation, and promote a better work-life balance. By establishing federal standards for overtime pay, the government aims to regulate and protect the rights of workers, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their additional work hours.
Learn more about social policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/3006046
#SPJ2