Answers
Due process & equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment guarantee that a government will abide by the rule of law and that citizens' rights will always be upheld
One of the Reconstruction Amendments, the Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868. It concerns citizenship rights and equal protection under the law, and it was drafted in response to problems involving former slaves after the American Civil War. It is frequently regarded as one of the most significant amendments.
The amendment is made up of five sections in total under the law, four of which were originally independent proposals that were abandoned during the legislative process and then combined with a fifth enforcement provision to form a single amendment.
To learn more about fourteenth amendment refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ4
Related Questions
write 5characters of pisces
Answers
Answer:
they have scale
they have fins
they respire through gills
they have streamline body
they lay eggs that is ovaprious
which pull factor is responsible for the east to west migration pattern evident in the european union region?
Answers
Answer:
They wanted more opportunities for jobs and economic purposes
Explanation:
The migration from east to west is called the Great Migration. African Americans decided to go to places like California to get jobs and to escape Jim crow laws/racial discrimination and segregation.
Read the text of the first amendment. select the words that protect people's right to practice their religion the way they want.
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
reset
next
all rights reserved.
Answers
The statement "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" protects the people's right to practice their religion the way they want.
What is the freedom of religion?In the First Amendment, the Constitution says that everyone in the United States has the right to practice his or her own religion.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about freedom of religion
brainly.com/question/2200062
#SPJ1
face-threatening acts differ in size and are dependent upon the interactants’ relationship, the size of the imposition, and the interactants’ ______.
Answers
Face-threatening acts differ in size and are dependent upon the interactants’ relationship, the size of the imposition, and the interactants’ facial wants or needs.
Face-threatening acts are actions or statements that have the potential to damage or threaten a person's positive face (desire to be liked and respected) or negative face (desire for autonomy and freedom from imposition).
The size or magnitude of a face-threatening act can vary depending on the nature of the relationship between the interactants, the extent of the imposition or threat to face, and the specific face wants or needs of the individuals involved.
Learn more about Face-threatening acts here:
https://brainly.com/question/31765000
#SPJ4
the immigration and nationality act of _____ imposed the first permanent annual immigration quota.
Answers
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1924 imposed the first permanent annual immigration quota.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, imposed the first permanent annual immigration quota in the United States. The law established a quota system that limited the number of immigrants from each country based on their national origin.
The quotas were heavily biased towards immigrants from Western and Northern Europe while severely limiting immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, Asia, and other regions. The act was intended to restrict immigration to the United States and maintain a certain ethnic composition of the population.
It remained in effect until it was revised by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which eliminated the discriminatory quotas based on national origin.
For more questions on: quota
https://brainly.com/question/29790538
#SPJ11
During the 1880s, Cameron was convicted of a felony and given a prison sentence. He observed that the peculiar prison that he was sent to looked like wheels with rows of cells emerging from a central hub. Which design or style did this particular prison use?
A.
telephone-pole style
B.
plantation-style system
C.
radial design
D.
campus style
Answers
Which of the following is a true statement about workers' compensation? Workers' compensation laws are federally mandated and enforced by OSHA. Since 1948, all states have had workers' compensation programs. Nonunion firms are not required to carry workers' compensation insurance. Most states had workers' compensation programs by 1911.
Answers
The true statement about workers' compensation is: Most states had workers' compensation programs by 1911. The correct option is D.
Workers' compensation is a system of insurance that provides medical benefits and wage replacement to employees who suffer work-related injuries or illnesses.
By 1911, most states in the United States had established workers' compensation programs. Prior to 1911, the lack of compensation for work-related injuries and the legal difficulties faced by workers seeking remedies led to the introduction and adoption of workers' compensation laws in various states.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about workers' compensation here:
https://brainly.com/question/15307992
#SPJ4
The complete question might be:
Which of the following is a true statement about workers' compensation?
A. Workers' compensation laws are federally mandated and enforced by OSHA.
B. Since 1948, all states have had workers' compensation programs.
C. Nonunion firms are not required to carry workers' compensation insurance.
D. Most states had workers' compensation programs by 1911.
Handout 1B: My Day in Court, But Which One?
Part I
A. A plaintiff is suing for damages resulting from a fall in the supermarket.
Which court should the plaintiff file in?
B. A trial judge did not supply a Russian-speaking defendant in a theft case
with an interpreter and the defendant is convicted. To which court should
the defendant appeal?
C. A defendant is charged with kidnapping a child and taking the child to five
different states. Where would the case be heard?
I
D. Several of the federal circuit courts of appeal are in disagreement over
whether a campaign finance reform law violates the First Amendment. What
is the only court that could decide to hear the case?
Answers
Answer:
Tenemos que el condenado es la persona que va a la cárcel debido la realización de diferentes delitos.
El imputado o acusado es una persona que se le acusa de diferentes delitos pero que todavía no ha sido demostrada la veracidad de esta acusación.
Cuando a un imputado se le demuestra frente a un juicio que es responsable de diferentes delitos se le aplica una condena y por ende pasa a ser un condenado.
dame corazon y 5 estrellas todo lo que miran
Explanation:
A. Africans' unified resistance to European intervention
B. Europeans' desire to develop industry in Africa
C. Europeans' use of both warfare and diplomacy
D. Africans' widespread acceptance of European laws
Answers
By using avoidance strategies, Africans were able to avoid colonial military and administrative injustices. Africans left their homes or concealed themselves when they heard approaching colonial armies, tax collectors, or labor recruiters in order to avoid violent encounters and eviction.
Africans fought European conquerors because they were afraid of them. Africans' intricate interpersonal relationships had an impact on the way they rebelled against the colonial power. They faced both European and African armies during their resistance to the European invasions. Due to the advanced military equipment that European colonists brought with them and which African forces were unable to match, African resistance to European imperialism fell short. Military opposition in Africa during the early stages of formal colonialism may occasionally be successful, although this was uncommon.
Learn more about it colonial here:-
https://brainly.com/question/28724126
#SPJ4
1. Explain your answers to the following questions:
• Why is public order necessary?
2. Does society have enough public order or too little?
Answers
2 we do not have enough public order people now a days do whatever they want in public
Erik owns a successful auditing firm. His business thus stores and manages sensitive financial information of several clients. He wants to protect such data with the help of better passwords and limit general access to sensitive database. Which of these private security personnel should Erik approach for such advice?
A. a security contractor
B. a private investigator
C. a security guard
D. a personal guard
E. a police officer
Answers
If Erik wants to protect sensitive financial information stored in his auditing firm, he should approach a security contractor for advice on implementing better passwords and limiting general access to the sensitive database. The correct option is A.
What are auditing and its importance?To ensure that all departments are using a documented system of documenting transactions, an auditor must examine or inspect multiple books of accounts in addition to physically examining inventory. It is done to check the correctness of the financial statements that the organization provides.
Security contractors are trained professionals who specialize in providing a range of security services, including security consulting, risk assessment, security design, and security technology implementation.
A private investigator typically conducts investigations and gathers information related to legal, financial, and personal matters, and may not have the specific expertise in information security and data protection that Erik requires.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about auditing firms here:
https://brainly.com/question/17138829
#SPJ3
One of the factors considered in determining the state statute to be constitutional and allow the states to regulate aspects of interstate commerce that have not been preempted by the federal government is that the state statute must:_____.
Answers
Answer: hello the options related to your question is missing below is the missing option
a. not further a legitimate local interest.
b. not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out-of-state interests.
c. allow only direct, not incidental, regulation of interstate commerce.
d. impose costs on interstate commerce that are more excessive than necessary to bring about the state interests.
answer:
Not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests
( B )
Explanation:
The state statue must not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests,
The commerce clause as enshrined in the constitution during the Tenth amendment does not grant the power to the states to regulate interstate economic activities without discrimination. it also serves as a grant power to congress, hence the states where granted powers to regulate interstate commerce
which of the following areas is included in health law? group of answer choices bioethics issues all of these are correct. healthcare delivery issues public health issues
Answers
Health law encompasses all of the following areas: bioethics issues, healthcare delivery issues, and public health issues.
Health law is a broad field that covers various aspects related to legal and ethical issues in healthcare. Bioethics issues are an essential component of health law, addressing topics such as patient rights, informed consent, end-of-life decisions, research ethics, and the use of emerging medical technologies. This aspect of health law focuses on balancing the principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice in medical decision-making.
Healthcare delivery issues also fall within the scope of health law. These issues involve the legal framework governing healthcare providers, facilities, and patient care. It encompasses matters such as licensing and credentialing of healthcare professionals, healthcare fraud and abuse, medical malpractice, patient privacy and confidentiality, and health insurance regulation. Health law plays a vital role in ensuring the quality, safety, and accountability of healthcare services.
Additionally, public health issues are an integral part of health law. Public health laws aim to safeguard and promote the health and well-being of populations. They cover areas such as disease control and prevention, vaccination requirements, environmental health regulations, food safety, emergency preparedness, and response to public health emergencies. These laws are crucial for maintaining the overall health of communities and preventing the spread of diseases.
In conclusion, health law encompasses bioethics issues, healthcare delivery issues, and public health issues. It provides the legal framework necessary to address the complex and evolving challenges within the healthcare system, ensuring the protection of individual rights, the provision of quality care, and the promotion of public health.
Learn more about public health here
https://brainly.com/question/2051613
#SPJ11
What is the schedule for the California border patrol tomorrow what time they start and leave please help it would mean a lot my grandmother is sick and need to visit her with any of the mean men
Answers
Answer:I think the start at 9 AM and leave At 7 PM
Explanation:
a) Los niños
Y у
las ninas no raconan.
¿Que efectos tiene esta idea en los
niños y las niñois ?
Answers
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.
Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.
Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.
A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Answers
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
If the entrance ramp enters the expressway from the left, you will enter the…. A.center lane on the expressway. B.expressway from a stopped position. C.Left Expressway Lane. D.interchange from the right.
Answers
Answer: ✓C.Left Expressway Lane
Hope this helps!
Which is an example of discretionary spending?
A. Education
B. Social security
C.medicare
D.federal taxes
Answers
Arianna was a victim of assault when a man attempted to grab her purse on a busy street. She did not let go of the purse, and the man hit her to get her to release her grip. Arianna told the police everything, went to the police station to identify the man who hit her, and attended the preliminary hearing in court. The judge in the preliminary hearing set bail for the man and ordered a trial date. Arianna contacts police to find that there will not be a trial. What has most likely happened?.
Answers
According to our analysis of the case, the scenario that is most likely to occur is that the defendant entered into a plea agreement with the prosecutor, victim as a consequence of which the court fixed the defendant's bail and appointed a trial date Arianna.
Therefore, choice 'B' is the best one. A plea bargain is a compromise reached by the prosecution and Arianna the defendant in criminal court whereby the defendant enters a guilty or no-contest plea in exchange for a concession from the prosecution victim. A plea bargain saves time for everyone concerned and can save a defendant from being found guilty of a more serious offense. For instance, in the American legal system, a person who is accused of felony larceny and faces potential state jail term may have the option to enter a plea to a Arianna less serious charge of misdemeanor theft, which might not carry a jail sentence. Plea bargaining was regarded as primarily an American practice in the 1970s victim.
Learn more about victim hear :
https://brainly.com/question/26483601
#SPJ4
it is to get behind the wheel with out thinking
Answers
Answer:
Highway hypnosis is the condition of when you drive/get behind the wheel without thinking or having proper consciousness.
Explanation:
which of the following is true about conditional privileges in defamation suits
Answers
Conditional privileges in defamation suits provide a defense for individuals who make defamatory statements under certain circumstances.
Conditional privileges in defamation suits offer legal protection to individuals who make defamatory statements in specific situations. These privileges serve as a defense, allowing the defendant to avoid liability for their statements, even if they are found to be defamatory. The application of conditional privileges varies depending on the jurisdiction and the particular circumstances of the case.
One common type of conditional privilege is the "qualified privilege." This privilege applies when a person has a legitimate interest or duty to communicate certain information to another person or group, even if the information is defamatory. For example, a doctor providing a patient's medical records to another healthcare professional for treatment purposes would likely be protected by a qualified privilege. However, the privilege is not absolute and can be lost if the statement is made with malice or without a reasonable belief in its truth.
Another type of conditional privilege is the "fair report privilege" or "reportage privilege." This privilege applies to journalists and media organizations when reporting on matters of public interest, such as court proceedings or official government statements. As long as the report is accurate and made in good faith, the fair report privilege can shield the journalist or media outlet from defamation claims.
It's important to note that conditional privileges are not automatic defenses in defamation cases. The defendant must establish that the privilege applies in their particular situation and that they acted within the bounds of the privilege. The burden of proof may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of privilege invoked.
Learn more about defamation:
brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ11
what do we call regulations governing how food is prepared and served at stadium concessions?
Answers
Health Codes are regulations governing how food is prepared and served at stadium concessions.
What version of the Food Code is current?The Food Code serves as a template for ensuring food is unadulterated and truthfully presented to consumers while also protecting the public's health. The FDA's top recommendation for an unified set of rules addressing the security and safety of foods sold in stores and in restaurants is embodied in this recommendation.
The FDA food code is written by who?At a conference for food protection for the industry, the FDA drafts the food code with the help of regulatory agencies (USDA and CDC), business, academia, and consumers (CFP). The Food Code used to be revised and published every two years; however, the process of doing so takes a lot of time.
To know more about Food Codes visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10504583
#SPJ1
What happens after the U.S. Supreme Court justices discuss and vote on the
case?
O A. Both parties make oral arguments to the Court.
B. The justices share their written opinions on the case.
C. Both parties petition for a writ of certiorari.
D. The justices agree to review the case.
Answers
Answer: B. The justices share their written opinions on the case.
Explanation:
When the time comes for the Justices to decide on the case, they will discuss it by stating their opinions on the case in descending order first from the Chief Justice and then from the most senior Justice to the least.
They will then vote on the case and then the Chief Justice or the most senior Justice on the majority side of the case will assign a justice to write the opinion of the court. The dissenting side can also do the same.
Name three observations about fluids at a crime scene which will enable an investigator to make reasonable predictions about what took place.
Answers
Answer & Explanation:
1.DNA, Saliva/ Semen (Can Be Tested)
2.Blood Splatter (Can Make A Prediction)
3.Drinks Such As Beer (Can Predict If They Were Under The Influence)
Your testing policies are not meant to discriminate against women, but
women pass your tests at significantly lower rates than men. The test you
are giving has not been professionally developed...indeed, you thought of
random "feats of strength" and not about the particular job at all. Because
you do not intend to discriminate against women, or any other protected
group, there are no employment discrimination claims that can be brought
against you.
True or false.
Answers
Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.
When can discrimination suits be brought?As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.
Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.
The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.
Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ1
hillcrest bananas juice bananas juice
Answers
Lol thank you for the free points!
Have a great day :)
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
Answers
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answers
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
1. Explain the interaction view of lawmaking and provide an example.
2. Which view of lawmaking do you agree with? Or which view of lawmaking do you not agree with? (interaction view, consensus view, conflict view)
Answers
Answer:
1.=The creation of jaywalking laws would be an example of the interactionist view in lawmaking .The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction ,such as the auto industry .
At least 200 words per question. Just start me off with 100 words and ill finish the rest! THANKS GUYS!!
1. What common problems have existed throughout the centuries for people in law enforcement?
2. Why was there no law enforcement during the daytime for many centuries?
3. What are some of the challenges law enforcement will face with intelligence-led policing as it emerges in the new era of policing?
Answers
Answer:
uhhhhh how am i supposed to know this??? u can look it up on the internet lol