which best describes the transformation that occurs from the graph of f(x)=x^2 to g(x)=(x-2)^2+3?? ​

Answer:

I haven't written full languages hope u get it

Means-end analysis is a method of problem-solving that is frequently employed.

A problem-solving heuristic is an informal, speculative method that occasionally results in a solution but not always. The consequences of using a heuristic are unpredictable, therefore the technique can either be more or less successful than using an algorithm.

Functional fixity is referred to be a cognitive bias. This indicates that when your brain is accustomed to thinking of a certain subject in a particular way, you are less likely to conceive of it in a novel or creative way. Your brain is so deeply imbedded with functional fixedness that it may be detected by imaging tests.

The definition of subproblems or subgoals is a common heuristic. Another often used heuristic is means-ends analysis, which involves figuring out how to close the gap between a goal and the actual reality. Using a means-ends analysis, you can break a problem down into smaller problems and address each one separately. Consequently, the means-end analysis method of issue solving is widely adopted.

To learn more about means end analysis visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/14762495

#SPJ1

Means-end analysis is a method of problem-solving that is frequently employed.

What is meant by heuristic problem solving?
A problem-solving heuristic is an informal, speculative method that occasionally results in a solution but not always. The consequences of using a heuristic are unpredictable, therefore the technique can either be more or less successful than using an algorithm.

What is meant by functional fixedness?

Functional fixity is referred to be a cognitive bias. This indicates that when your brain is accustomed to thinking of a certain subject in a particular way, you are less likely to conceive of it in a novel or creative way. Your brain is so deeply imbedded with functional fixedness that it may be detected by imaging tests.

The definition of subproblems or subgoals is a common heuristic. Another often used heuristic is means-ends analysis, which involves figuring out how to close the gap between a goal and the actual reality. Using a means-ends analysis, you can break a problem down into smaller problems and address each one separately. Consequently, the means-end analysis method of issue solving is widely adopted.

To learn more about analysis visit the link:
https://brainly.com/question/29114661
#SPJ1

Answer: drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. Not all tiles will be used.

Match each

Step-by-step explanation:

Dr. Veniegas used random sampling  in her research, she can make the reasonable assumption that the sample is representative of the population, and the findings can be generalized to the larger population.

Random sampling is a method of selecting a subset of individuals from a larger population in such a way that each individual has an equal chance of being included in the sample. By employing random sampling, Dr. Veniegas aims to ensure that the sample is representative of the population, meaning that the characteristics and diversity within the sample reflect those of the larger population.

When random sampling is properly conducted, it helps to minimize biases and increase the likelihood that the findings from the sample can be generalized to the entire population. This assumption holds under the premise that the random sample accurately represents the characteristics, behaviors, or attitudes of the larger population.

Dr. Veniegas used random sampling in her research, she can reasonably assume that the findings and conclusions drawn from the sample can be extended or generalized to the larger population with a certain level of confidence.

To learn more about likelihood.

Click here:brainly.com/question/28213407?

#SPJ11

Answer:

I believe the answer is 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope that helps!

Answer:

x=45 (degrees)

Step-by-step explanation:

(2x+45)+x= 180 (linear pair)

3x+45=180

3x=180-45

3x=135

x=45 (degrees)

Answer:

x=45  

Step-by-step explanation:

(2x+45)+x= 180                                     (linear pair)

3x+45=180

3x=180-45

3x=135

x=45

The approximate value of 九十√70 is 11.51, correct option is 11.51.

An approximation is anything that is similar, but not exactly equal, to something else.

Now, the value of 九 is given as 22/7 is 3.142

To the nearest hundredth, it can be written as 3.14

The value of +√70 is given as 8.366

To the nearest hundredth as 8.37

For the required value of the expression we can write,

九十√70

Put the value of 九 = 3.14

and value of √70 = 8.37

Putting values in expression we have,

九十√70 = 3.14 + 8.37

⇒九十√70 = 11.51

Hence,the approximate value of 九十√70 is 11.51.

So,the correct option is 11.51.

More about approximation :

https://brainly.com/question/28212944

#SPJ1

A decrease in the market demand curve indicates that consumers are willing to purchase fewer units of the good or service at each price point.

A decrease in the market demand curve indicates that the quantity of goods and services demanded by consumers at each price point is decreasing. Put another way, the quantity demanded is inversely related to the price. When the price of a good or service increases, consumers are less likely to purchase it, and as a result, the quantity of the good or service demanded decreases. Conversely, when the price of a good or service decreases, consumers are more likely to purchase it, and as a result, the quantity of the good or service demanded increases. In short, a decrease in the market demand curve reflects a decrease in the quantity of goods and services that consumers are willing to purchase at each price point.

Learn more about curve here

https://brainly.com/question/28793630

#SPJ4

If z = x2 − xy 5y2 and (x, y) changes from (3, −1) to (3. 03, −1. 05), the values of δz and dz when (x, y) change from (3, −1) to (3.03, −1.05) are -2.1926 and 0.63 respectively.

As we know,  z = x² - xy - 5y². We have to find the comparison between δz and dz when (x, y) changes from (3, −1) to (3.03, −1.05). The total differential of z, dz IS:

dz = ∂z/∂x dx + ∂z/∂y dyδz = z(3.03, -1.05) - z(3, -1)

The partial derivatives of z with respect to x and y can be calculated as:

∂z/∂x = 2x - y∂z/∂y = -x - 10y

Let (x, y) change from (3, −1) to (3.03, −1.05).

Then change in x, δx = 3.03 - 3 = 0.03

Change in y, δy = -1.05 - (-1) = -0.05

δz = z(3.03, -1.05) - z(3, -1)

δz = (3.03)² - (3.03)(-1) - 5(-1.05)² - [3² - 3(-1) - 5(-1)²]

δz = 9.1809 + 3.09 - 5.5125 - 8.95δz = -2.1926

Round δz to four decimal places,δz = -2.1926

dz = ∂z/∂x

δx + ∂z/∂y δydz = (2x - y) dx - (x + 10y) dy

When (x, y) = (3, -1), we have,

dz = (2(3) - (-1)) (0.03) - ((3) + 10(-1))(-0.05)

dz = (6 + 0.03) - (-7) (-0.05)

dz ≈ 0.63

Round dz to four decimal places, dz ≈ 0.63

You can learn more about derivatives at: brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

\(y = \frac{1}{3} x - 5 \\ \\ 2x + y = 2 \\ = > 2x + \frac{1}{3} x - 5 = 2 \\ = > \frac{6x + x}{3} = 2 + 5 \\ = > \frac{7x}{3} = 7 \\ = > x = 7 \times \frac{3}{7} \\ = > x = 3\)

\(y = \frac{1}{3} x - 5 \\ = > y = \frac{1}{3} \times 3 - 5 \\ = > y = 1 - 5 \\ = > y = - 4\)

Hope you could get an idea from here

Doubt clarification - use comment section.

In one-year, the promised yields have risen to 7%, then the 1-year holding-period return was : (a) 0.61%.

The "Par-value" of the bond (face value) is = $1,000;

Coupon rate = 6% (annual payment coupon)

Yield at purchasing time is = 6%

Yield after 1 year = 7%

Step 1: Calculate the present value of the redeemable value:

We know that PVIF at 7% for 7 years is 0.623,

So, Present value of redeemable value = (Par value) × PVIF = $1,000 × 0.623 = $622.75,

Step 2: Calculate the present value of coupon payments:

Coupon payment = (Coupon rate)×(Par value) = 6% × $1,000 = $60,

We know that PVAF at 7% for 7 years is 5.389,

So, Present value of coupon payments = (Coupon payment) × (PVAF) = $60 × 5.389 = $323.36,

Step 3: Calculate the price of bond after 1 year:

Price of bond = Present value of redeemable value + Present value of coupon payments,

Substituting the values,

We get,

Price of bond = $622.75 + $323.36 = $946.11

Step 4: Calculate the 1-year holding-period return:

Holding return = (Price in next year + Coupon interest - Price in current year) / Price in current year,

Holding return = ($946.11 + $60 - $1,000) / $1,000

Holding return = $6.11 / $1,000

Holding return = 0.00611 = 0.61%.

Therefore, the correct option is (a).

Learn more about Bond here

https://brainly.com/question/31512988

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

You buy an 8-year $1,000 par value bond today that has a 6% yield and a 6% annual payment coupon. In 1 year promised yields have risen to 7%. Your 1-year holding-period return was

(a) 0.61%

(b) -5.39%

(c) 1.28%

(d) -3.25%

Answer:

a=7

Step-by-step explanation:

3a-10 = 4+a

2a-10 = 4

2a = 10+4

2a = 14

a = 7

CHECK

21-10 = 4+7

11 = 11

Correct

Answer:

A=7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Hi there!

Your answer is:

996 students were apart of this survey!

Step-by-step explanation:

3 out of 4 students means that 75% of students prefer the assemblies be held on Friday.

If 75% = 747 students then:

/75

1% = 9.96 students

×100

100% = 996 students

I hope this makes sense!

Answer: 2/21

Step-by-step explanation:

2/3x6-3+5/3x3

2/18-3+5

2/21

When a crucial variable is excluded from a regression model, the results are referred to as omitted variable bias.

Regression analysis frequently encounters the issue of omitted variable bias, which occurs when an important independent variable is left out of the model and affects the estimates of the coefficients for the included variables.

This happens because one or more of the included independent variables as well as the dependent variable may be correlated with the variable that was left out. As a result, the intercept and coefficients of the included independent variables may be overestimated or underestimated.

Based on prior knowledge and theory, researchers should carefully consider which variables to include in the model to address this issue. They should then test for potential correlations between the included and

Learn more about omitted variable bias:

https://brainly.com/question/26424928

#SPJ4

Answer:

Number of books= 2 books

Step-by-step explanation:

number of books Jason reads each week is inversely proportional to the number of hours

Let books be x

Let hours be y

X= k/y

Where k is constant of proportionality

Jason read three books and spent four hours

3= k/4

3*4= k

12= k

So

X= 12/y

If he spent six hours

Number of books x

X= 12/6

X= 2 books

Answer:

x=29

Step-by-step explanation:

We know for a fact that in a square:

- All of its angles have equal measure (90 degrees)

(e.g. Measure of Angle CAT, measure of Angle CST = 90 degrees)

Now that we know the facts, let's try to find x.

Now since we know that all the angles are equivalent to 90 degrees, we can say that Measurement of Angle SCA is 90 degrees. So:

\(90=3x+3\)

Next, we'll simply just isolate the x:

\(90=3x+3\\90-3=3x+3-3\\87=3x\\\frac{87=3x}{3} \\29 = x\)

Answer:

m = d - n + a

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract n and add a on both sides to isolate m

Answer:

Option C is the correct answer.

C.  5•(-20)

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told that the insurance payment for the car follows a certain pattern that can be represented through an expression. The payment is decreasing by $20 every year. As we don't know the total payment amount per period, so we cannot calculate how much is paid per period/year for insurance but we can calculate the rate at which this payment is decreasing.

Change in payment = t * (-20)

The above expressions can be used to calculate the amount of change in payment i payment is decreasing by a constant $20 every year, after t years.

So, if we want to calculate the change in payment after say 5 years, we can replace t with 5 in the equation and calculate the change,

Change in payment = 5 * (-20)

Change in payment = - $100

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

oh im late-......

a. The sample mean for University A (`mean_A`) and University B (`mean_B`). You can compare these values to observe the difference in the sample means.

b. To test the hypothesis that the population means are different, you can perform a two-sample t-test using the `t.test()` function in R.

To compare the sample means and test the hypothesis that the population means are different for the prices of books at University A and University B, you can perform a two-sample t-test. Here's how you can approach this problem in R:

a. First, find both sample means and compare them:

Let's assume you have two vectors, `sample_A` and `sample_B`, containing the book prices from University A and University B, respectively. You can calculate the sample means using the `mean()` function in R:

```R

sample_A <- c(12.5, 15.2, 18.6, 14.8, 16.3)  # Example values for sample A

sample_B <- c(10.8, 13.4, 16.9, 12.2, 15.7)  # Example values for sample B

mean_A <- mean(sample_A)

mean_B <- mean(sample_B)

mean_A

mean_B

```

The output will give you the sample mean for University A (`mean_A`) and University B (`mean_B`). You can compare these values to observe the difference in the sample means.

b. Test the hypothesis that the population means are different:

To test the hypothesis that the population means are different, you can perform a two-sample t-test using the `t.test()` function in R. The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that the population means are equal, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) assumes that the population means are different.

```R

t_test <- t.test(sample_A, sample_B, alternative = "two.sided", mu = 0, paired = FALSE, var.equal = FALSE)

t_test

```

The output of the `t.test()` function will provide the test statistic, p-value, and confidence interval for the difference in population means.

To evaluate the hypothesis test at a significance level of 0.05, you can check the p-value. If the p-value is less than 0.05, you can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence of a significant difference in the population means. Otherwise, if the p-value is greater than 0.05, you would fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating no significant difference in the population means.

Make sure to replace the example values in `sample_A` and `sample_B` with your actual data before running the code.

To know more about hypothesis test, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/32874475#

#SPJ11

Answer:

$2696.63

Explanation:

The future value A and the present value P are related by the following equation

A = P(1 + rt)

Where r is the interest rate and t is the time.

Now, we need to convert 9 months to years as follows

9 months x 1 year / 12 months = 0.75 years

Then, replacing A = 3000, r = 15% = 0.15 and t = 0.75, we get:

3000 = P(1 + 0.15(0.75))

3000 = P(1 + 0.1125)

3000 = P(1.1125)

Now, we can solve for P

P = 3000/1.1125

P = 2696.63

Therefore, the present value is $2696.63

The diagonal length of the square sandbox in Triha's backyard is 9 feet.

The area of a square is equal to the length of one side squared. Therefore, if the area of the sandbox is 81 square feet, this means that one side of the sandbox has a length of sqrt(81) = 9 feet.

The diagonal of a square is a line segment that connects two opposite corners of the square. It is also known as the hypotenuse of the right triangle formed by the sides of the square. Since the sides of a square are all equal in length, the diagonal of a square is also equal to the length of one side multiplied by the square root of 2.

Therefore, to find the diagonal length of the sandbox, we can multiply the length of one side (9 feet) by the square root of 2:

x = 9 feet * sqrt(2) = 9 feet * 1.41 = 9 * 1.41 = 12.69 feet ≈ 9 feet

Thus, the diagonal length of the square sandbox in Triha's backyard is approximately 9 feet.

Learn more about area of a square here:

https://brainly.com/question/25092270

#SPJ4

The probability of getting at least one 2 given that the sum of the numbers is 7 is 2/6 or 1/3.

To find the probability that the number 2 has appeared at least once given that the sum of the numbers is 7, we need to use the concept of conditional probability.

Let's consider the possible outcomes when two dice are rolled. The total number of outcomes is 36, as each die has six possible outcomes.

Out of these 36 outcomes, there are six outcomes in which the sum of the numbers appearing on the upper faces is 7. These outcomes are (1,6), (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,2), and (6,1).

Out of these six outcomes, there are two outcomes in which the number 2 appears at least once: (1,6) and (2,5).

We can use the formula for conditional probability to verify our answer:

P(2 appears at least once | sum is 7) = P(2 appears at least once and sum is 7) / P(sum is 7)

P(2 appears at least once and sum is 7) = 2/36 = 1/18 (as there are two outcomes with a sum of 7 that have a 2 in them)

P(sum is 7) = 6/36 = 1/6

So, P(2 appears at least once | sum is 7) = (1/18) / (1/6) = 1/3, which is consistent with our previous answer.

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/13866543

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is D

Step-by-step explanation: