Which area experienced the biggest budget cut during Sam Houston’s second term?
a.
education
b.
government spending
c.
military
d.
settlement expansion

Answer:

Polynesian / Pacific Islander

Took the test. Promise this is correct!

Answer:

make laws

Explanation:

because people need to follow them

Although voting is considered a fundamental right and civic duty in many democracies, including South Africa, individuals also have the right not to vote. Here are three reasons why South Africans have the right not to vote:

                    Freedom of choice: The right not to vote is a manifestation of individual freedom and autonomy. People should be free to choose to participate in the electoral process without coercion or punishment. It allows people to express their dissatisfaction, resignation, or distrust of the political system or existing candidates.

                     Political dissent and protest: Not voting can be a form of political dissent or protest. By not voting, a person can send a message to the government and political parties expressing dissatisfaction with the current situation or disagreement with the options available. It can be seen as an opportunity to express a desire for change or register a protest against perceived injustice or systemic problems.  

                     Conscious Abstention: Some people may choose not to vote out of principle or philosophy. They may have beliefs that prevent them from participating in the electoral process, such as religious or ethical objections. For example, some religious groups may abstain from voting because they believe in the separation of religious and political matters.

Learn more about the right to vote here,

https://brainly.com/question/21910013

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Avoiding sources of exposure is the best way to stop the spread of avian (bird) influenza (flu). Avian influenza virus is shed by infected birds in their saliva, mucus, and feces.

To know more about avain influenza here

https://brainly.com/question/26107459

#SPJ4

Answer:

oil

Explanation:

texas was a oil gold mine

Answer:

it is artistole

Explanation:

i have k12 and i struggle with getting correct answers also so

i really hope this answer

will help you with your work

thanks for reading my answer and have a nice day

don't put so much pressure on yourself if your doing the 27 questions test I am and i already know how hard it is to focus on it but its gonna be fine bye bye and i hope you have a great day love

bye bye

Answer:

can vote regardless of their race or gender.

Explanation:

civil rights protect people of color and protect them from many other things like slavery and forced working but it also allows them the right to vote

Answer:

So in the War of 1812 America is utterly unsuccessful in gaining any land, however in the Mexican American War all the land we hoped for at the beginning of the war we have almost no problem in obtaining. We were so successful in the Mexican American war that the Mexican government invite Santa Ana to come back because of the incompetence of their current generals. However, one big similarity is the creation of extremely popular war heroes. Andrew Jackson in the war of 1812, and later on Zachary Taylor in the Mexican American War.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Professor Cobb's point can be valid if we consider the possibility that even if the document in question is not genuine, it may still reflect certain aspects of today's society concerning black and brown people. While historical authenticity is crucial, it is essential to acknowledge that the document's content might resonate with current social issues faced by marginalized communities. It could highlight enduring systemic biases, racial discrimination, or unequal treatment that persist in various forms. Professor Cobb's argument invites us to critically examine the document's themes and consider their relevance within our contemporary context.

When contemplating why someone would fabricate such a document, several potential purposes come to mind. Firstly, it might serve as a thought-provoking tool, aiming to shed light on historical injustices and their echoes in modern society. By presenting a fictional account rooted in real historical experiences, the intention could be to prompt conversations, foster empathy, and encourage discussions on racial equality. Secondly, the document could be a work of creative expression, seeking to explore the human experience and provoke emotional responses. Lastly, it is possible that someone might create such a document to deceive or manipulate others, exploiting sensitive issues for personal gain or to incite unrest. However, further investigation and analysis would be necessary to determine the true motives behind its creation.

In conclusion, while the authenticity of the document remains uncertain, Professor Cobb raises a valid point by urging us to examine its content in relation to present-day experiences of black and brown communities. Regardless of its origins, the document could provide insights into persistent societal issues, serving as a catalyst for discussions and reflections on racial inequalities. Understanding the purpose behind its creation requires careful examination and consideration of the broader context, encompassing educational, artistic, or potentially manipulative intentions.

Answer:

Explanation:

Suleiman's philosophy differs from absolution in Europe in several ways. Suleiman was the Ottoman Empire's longest reigning sultan, ruling from 1520 to 1566. During his reign, he implemented a number of reforms that had a significant impact on the empire's legal and political systems.One of the key ways in which Suleiman's philosophy differed from absolution in Europe was in his approach to justice. Suleiman believed in the importance of fairness and equality, and he sought to create a legal system that was based on these principles. In contrast, the absolutist systems of Europe were characterized by a strict hierarchy and a focus on the power of the monarch.Another key difference was in Suleiman's approach to religion. He was a devout Muslim and he sought to integrate Islamic principles into the legal and political systems of the empire. In contrast, European absolutist systems were often based on Christian principles and relied on the authority of the Catholic Church.Overall, Suleiman's philosophy differed from absolution in Europe in its emphasis on fairness, equality, and religious tolerance. He was a visionary leader who sought to create a just and inclusive society, and his reforms had a lasting impact on the Ottoman Empire and beyond.

Radical Republicans reacted strongly when President Johnson broke the laws set up to force him to act on Reconstruction, as they believed it was an abuse of power and a threat to the progress of Reconstruction.

The Radical Republicans strongly opposed President Johnson's actions when he broke laws that were created to enforce Reconstruction policies, such as the Tenure of Office Act. They believed it was an abuse of power and a threat to the progress of Reconstruction.

The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 were passed to protect the rights of newly-freed slaves and ensure the South's reconstruction. Radical Republicans feared that Johnson's actions would undermine these efforts and lead to a return of white supremacy in the South. Consequently, they pushed for his impeachment, but the effort failed by one vote in the Senate.

To know more about Radical Republicans, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/19709061

#SPJ4

1. After exploring a Farmer's Almanac, one interesting aspect I found was the wealth of agricultural and weather-related information it provides.

From lunar planting calendars and tide predictions to frost dates and weather forecasts, the almanac offers practical knowledge for farmers and gardeners. The inclusion of celestial events, such as meteor showers and eclipses, adds a touch of wonder to the almanac. Additionally, I discovered intriguing folklore, proverbs, and snippets of historical information scattered throughout, giving a glimpse into the cultural beliefs and practices of the past.

2. Here are a few catchy sayings that could be included in a modern-day almanac:

- "Plant a tree today, shade tomorrow's dreams."

Encouraging environmental awareness and the importance of sustainable practices.

- "Embrace the rain, let it wash away your worries."

Promoting a positive mindset and finding beauty in nature's elements.

- "A kind word is like sunshine on a cloudy day."

Highlighting the power of kindness and its ability to brighten someone's day.

- "Let the stars guide you, but remember, you hold the map."

Empowering individuals to follow their dreams while recognizing their own agency.

These sayings aim to inspire reflection, offer practical wisdom, and promote values that resonate with the needs and aspirations of people today.

To learn more about lunar planting calendars, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30579877

#SPJ11

The sentences that matched in relation to how railroads changed are as follows:

Americans began to measure time using time zones.

Rail travel became safer.

These statements match what I have learned about how railroads changed and developed. However, the statement "Railroads tried to become more versatile" is somewhat vague and could have different interpretations depending on the context.

The statement "Rail companies began to create their own styles of rails and tracks" is not entirely accurate as standardization of rail gauge was crucial for the growth of railroads.

learn more about railroads: https://brainly.com/question/11433327

#SPJ1

The English Bill of Rights created a constitutional monarchy in England, meaning the king or queen acts as head of state but his or her powers are limited by law.

What is English Bill?

The document, originally known as the English Bill of Rights of 1689, contains many rights that were later incorporated into the First Amendment, such as the right to petition and the freedom of speech and debate.

What does freedom of speech mean?

Freedom of speech is the fundamental right of individuals to communicate their ideas and opinions without fear of censorship or retaliation. It is a core principle of democracy, as it allows people to express their views openly and without fear of government interference or retribution. This right is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and it is protected in many countries by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Under this system, the monarchy couldn't rule without the consent of Parliament, and the people were given individual rights.

To know more about English Bill,

https://brainly.com/question/13340273
#SPJ4

Answer:

Individual rights are those considered so essential that they warrant specific statutory protection from interference. While the U.S. Constitution, for example, divides and restricts the powers of the federal and state governments to check their own and each other’s power, it also expressly ensures and protects certain rights and liberties of individuals from government interference. Most of these rights, such as the First Amendment’s prohibition of government actions that limit the freedom of speech and the Second Amendment's protection of the right to keep and bear arms, are enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Other individual rights, however, are established throughout the Constitution, such as the right to trial by jury in Article III and the Sixth Amendment, and the Due Process of Law Clause found in the post-Civil War Fourteenth Amendment.  

What Is the Bill of Rights?

Many individual rights protected by the Constitution deal with criminal justice, such as the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable governmental searches and seizures and the Fifth Amendment’s well-known right against self-incrimination. Other individual rights are established by the U.S. Supreme Court in its interpretations of the often vaguely worded rights found in the Constitution.

Individual rights are often considered in contrast to group rights, the rights of groups based on the enduring characteristics of their members. Examples of group rights include the rights of an indigenous people that its culture should be respected and the rights of a religious group that it should be free to engage in collective expressions of its faith and that its sacred sites and symbols should not be desecrated.

Explanation:

Answer:

Answer:

In Europe, rival states wanted the latest weaponry, or even better, something new that would give them decisive advantages over their rivals.

Explanation:

P.S i am emo

Answer:

its C

Explanation:

Answer:

to raise money for defending the colonists’ territory

Explanation:

Got it correct on edge

Answer:

When government officials encouraged Southeastern tribes to exchange their lands for new territory in the West, they weren’t sending these tribes to empty, unoccupied territory. When the Western Cherokee agreed to leave voluntarily for the Indian Territory, they encountered the Osage, who already lived in lands that stretched across eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas. The Osage felt that the Cherokee were invaders, and the Cherokee felt that the Osage were occupying the lands they were promised. Because of this disagreement, the tribes fought a deadly war that lasted until the Osage were removed to new lands in the North.

Explanation:

this is the possible answer on edge 2020.

Answer: B

Explanation:

The workforce that built the pyramids was mainly composed of farmers because farmers could work on the pyramids during the flooding seasons of the Nile.

Answer:

By the summer of 1929, he had signed into law the creation of a Federal Farm Board to help farmers with government price supports, expanded tax cuts across all income classes, and set aside federal funds to clean up slums in major American cities.

The aims of the Allied Powers in the occupation of Japan were largely achieved successfully in the period up to 1951.

Following Japan's surrender in 1945, the Allies sought to demilitarize, democratize, and rebuild the country. The Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers (SCAP), General Douglas MacArthur, implemented a series of reforms to achieve these goals.
Under SCAP, Japan's military was disbanded, war criminals were prosecuted, and a new constitution was drafted. The new constitution, known as the "MacArthur Constitution," established democratic principles and guaranteed fundamental rights and freedoms. Moreover, SCAP implemented economic reforms that led to Japan's rapid recovery and transformation into an economic powerhouse.
By the end of the occupation period, Japan had achieved political stability, established democratic institutions, and embraced a market economy. The aims of the Allied Powers were also accomplished through the signing of the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951, which restored Japan's sovereignty and ended the occupation.
However, it is important to acknowledge that the occupation also faced some challenges. For instance, the process of democratization faced resistance from conservative elements in Japanese society. Additionally, some argue that the occupation failed to address certain issues, such as the war crimes committed by individual Japanese soldiers.
Overall, while some goals may not have been fully realized, the occupation of Japan can be considered successful in achieving the broader objectives set forth by the Allied Powers.

Learn more about democratize :

https://brainly.com/question/30189685

#SPJ11

Other minorities fought for civil rights through various means, employing strategies such as activism, litigation, and advocacy.

African Americans, inspired by the Civil Rights Movement, organized protests, boycotts, and marches to demand equal rights and an end to racial segregation. Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and Malcolm X played crucial roles in mobilizing and galvanizing the African American community.

Hispanic Americans also fought for civil rights, with organizations like the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the United Farm Workers (UFW) advocating for fair treatment, labor rights, and an end to discrimination. Cesar Chavez, Dolores Huerta, and other activists led strikes and boycotts to protest unfair working conditions.

Native Americans fought for their rights through legal battles, activism, and the establishment of organizations like the American Indian Movement (AIM). They demanded recognition of tribal sovereignty, preservation of cultural heritage, and better living conditions for indigenous communities.

Asian Americans engaged in grassroots activism, such as the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), to combat discrimination and advocate for civil rights. They fought against discriminatory immigration policies and worked towards social and political equality.

These minority groups employed various strategies, often drawing inspiration from the Civil Rights Movement, to challenge injustice and secure equal rights for their respective communities. Their collective efforts contributed significantly to the broader struggle for civil rights in the United States.

For more such questions on civil rights

https://brainly.com/question/1346208

#SPJ8

Answer:

The objects found in graves are usually different. Some skeletons were buried with a great number of pots, while some with just a few of them. Archaeologists have thus concluded that people were buried with objects depending upon their status. For example, a rich lady might be buried with jewellery and precious items like combs. On the other hand a poor lady might be buried with simple pot.

© topper.com

The late 1800s saw many people from European and Asian nations come to the United States in search of a better life. However, not all of the factors that lured them to the U.S. were the same. Military service was not a factor that caused people to come to the United States from Europe and Asia in the late 1800s. The factor that did not lure people to the United States from European and Asian nations in the late 1800s is a significant lack of job opportunities, a significant number of taxes, and political turmoil.

In the late 1800s, the United States drew a lot of immigrants from European and Asian nations due to the following factors:High wages were available in the United States. There was a lot of work to be done in America, and there were only a few people willing to do it. To encourage people to work, employers offered them high wages. As a result, they could save up for their future and their families.The United States had a significant shortage of labor. Immigrants helped bridge this gap by providing the necessary labor to drive America's rapid industrialization.The United States had a lot of land. The Homestead Act of 1862 gave land to anyone who agreed to farm it for at least five years. It was a fantastic deal that encouraged many people to come to America. They were able to farm and provide for their families in this manner.The United States was a place where people could start over. Many immigrants to America had left behind poverty, starvation, and political turmoil. America provided them with a fresh start where they could build a new life and a better future for themselves and their children.

For more such questions on United States

https://brainly.com/question/4428758

#SPJ11

Answer:

The correct answer is B

The demand for watching women's soccer decreased

Answer: The Boston Port Act  was the first of the Coercive Acts. Parliament passed the bill on March 31, 1774, and King George III gave it royal assent on May 20th.  The act authorized the Royal Navy to blockade Boston Harbor because “the commerce of his Majesty’s subjects cannot be safely carried on there."1 The blockade commenced on June 1, 1774, effectively closing Boston’s port to commercial traffic. Additionally, it forbade any exports to foreign ports or provinces. The only imports allowed were provisions for the British Army and necessary goods, such as fuel and wheat. The Act mandated that the port remain shuttered until Bostonians made restitution to the East India Company (the owners of the destroyed tea), the king had determined that the colony was able to obey British laws, and that British goods once again could be traded in the harbor safely. However, if the Bostonians refused to pay the East India Company or the king remained unsatisfied, the harbor would be blockaded indefinitely.

The Act for the Impartial Administration of Justice gained the king’s approval on the same day as the Massachusetts Government Act. This law sought to further increase the power of the governor by giving him the ability to move a trial to another colony or Great Britain if it was determined “that an indifferent trial cannot be had within the said province."3 The Act eliminated the right to a fair trial by one’s peers, removing an established judicial principle dating to Magna Carta.

The Quartering Act was the fourth and final of the main Coercive Acts. It was given royal assent on June 2, 1774. The only act of the four to apply to all of the colonies, it allowed high-ranking military officials to demand better accommodations for troops and to refuse inconvenient locations for quarters. The inability to effectively house troops in North America had been a long-standing issue. Troops were often billeted far from the areas in which they operated, making it difficult for the army to exercise effective control over the colonists. However, the Act did not require colonists to house soldiers within their private homes, as is commonly believed. Rather, it specifically indicated that soldiers were to be housed in “uninhabited houses, out-houses, barns, or other buildings,” yet they were to be quartered at the colonists’ expense.

Explanation:

Answer:

vakue is 43 = 8 plus 23 he t

Explanation: