American leaders followed a policy of containment in response to the events you mentioned. Containment aimed to prevent the spread of communism by limiting its influence to already-established regions.
This approach was developed during the Cold War, primarily by George F. Kennan. The policy guided American foreign policy in various instances, such as the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and the Korean War. By providing economic and military aid to countries threatened by communism, the United States sought to maintain a balance of power and protect its global interests. Containment remained a significant aspect of U.S. foreign policy throughout the Cold War era.
For more such questions on policy, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/3810659
#SPJ11
Examples of how Congress oversees the power of the executive branch is its power to
A: approve presidential appointments and conduct investigations
B: create regulations that only apply to official executive offices
C: sign the president's policies into law and enforce regulations
D: impeach executive officials for creating too much red tape
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
a
Explanation:
what did the judge revoke or deny derek chauvin?
Answer:
The judge revoked Derek Chauvin's bail and said he would be sentenced in eight weeks. ... Chauvin was convicted on all three charges he faced at trial — second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter
What would be the likely outcome if the courts and the criminal justice system did not treat cases differently simply because of the offense involved
1. John offers Tk. 5,000 to anyone who will remove
rubbish and clean his garden. The following people comply with the terms of
this offer:
(a) His wife, Gen;
(b) His ex-wife, Flora;
(c) His colleague, Sam
(d) His son, 9 years old, William;
(e) His next-door neighbor, Billy-a lunatic.
Advise John whether or not, in these circumstances, any legally
enforceable contracts have been concluded.
Answer:
In these circumstances, it is unlikely that legally enforceable contracts have been concluded with everyone who has complied with John's offer.
(a) John's wife Gen is considered a household member, and thus cannot enter into a contract with her husband.
(b) John's ex-wife Flora, however, can enter into a contract with John.
(c) John's colleague Sam can also enter into a contract with John as they have a professional relationship.
(d) John's son William is a minor, and as per the contract law, a minor cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
(e) John's next-door neighbor Billy is a lunatic, and as per the contract law, a person of unsound mind cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
In conclusion, only John's ex-wife Flora and his colleague Sam have entered into legally enforceable contracts with John for the removal of rubbish and cleaning of his garden.
Why do civilians in the United States, Great Britain, or France join terrorist groups and agree to fight against their own countries? (Select all that apply.)
they become brainwashed into believing that violent acts have a religious purpose.
they feel alienated or dissatisfied in their own country or as if they "don’t belong."
they receive large amounts of money from terrorist organizations for carrying out violence.
they lose their sanity and think that the government in their home country is out to get them.
Answer:
The United Nations family has itself suffered tragic human loss as a result of violent terrorist acts. The attack on its offices in Baghdad on.
People also ask
Meanings of the following please
a. SWGDRUG
b. SWGDOC
c. SWGTOX
d. SWGCBRN
Answer:
.
Explanation:
A. Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs
B. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination
C. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology
D. Scientific Working Group for the Forensic Analysis of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Terrorism
Which term refers to the conversion of firearm evidence into two or three dimensional images?
A. Forensic photography
B. Criminal imaging
C. Forensic imaging
D. Ballistic imaging
E. Tool mark imaging
Case 4.3, Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P., involved a Mariners fan, Delinda Middleton Taylor, who was injured by a baseball that entered the stands during team warm-ups. The issue in the case was a. whether the risk of injury from an errant baseball was foreseeable to a reasonable person with Taylor's familiarity with baseball. b. whether the ball was thrown into the stands intentionally. c. whether Taylor suffered a legally recognizable injury. d. false imprisonment.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.
in determining whether a party has manifested intent to make a promise, a court will start by considering the ordinary meaning of the words.
The statement "in determining whether a party has manifested intent to make a promise, a court will start by considering the ordinary meaning of the words." is true as considering the ordinary meaning of the words is important in understanding the intentions of the parties.
To determine whether there is a manifested intent to make a promise, a court will typically begin by looking at the common meaning of the words used by a party. This is so that everyone involved can interpret and understand each other's intentions, which depends on the ordinary meaning of words. The court can determine whether words convey a clear and unambiguous intention to be bound by a promise or contract by examining their ordinary meaning in the court proceedings.
It's crucial to understand that the court's analysis extends beyond just the words common meaning. The context, the surrounding circumstances and the behavior of the parties may all be taken into account when figuring out the promise's true intent.
To know more about court proceedings here
brainly.com/question/32474018
#SPJ4
The complete question is "in determining whether a party has manifested intent to make a promise, a court will start by considering the ordinary meaning of the words.
true/false"
in blank law countries, accounting is conservative, focusing on the balance sheet and the company's assets
In code-law countries, accounting is conservative, focusing on the balance sheet and the company's assets.
An asset is any useful resource owned or controlled by means of a commercial enterprise or an monetary entity. it is something that may be used to produce effective financial fee. belongings represent price of possession that may be transformed into cash.
An asset is anything that has current or destiny monetary cost to a enterprise. essentially, for corporations, property encompass the entirety controlled and owned through the enterprise it's presently valuable or ought to provide economic gain within the destiny. Examples encompass patents, equipment, and investments.
Learn more about assets here:https://brainly.com/question/25746199
#SPJ4
Jose can't wait to buy his first car next month. He imagines that he will make several new friends at school since everyone will want to ride in his car. He is even having a hard time concentrating on filling orders at the restaurant where he works. Does Jose's thinking have an ethical component? Who is most affected by Jose's conduct? *
Answer:
no , jose Is Mostly effected because he is about to buy and As he is Having hard time filling orders He isn't doing his job properly which is affecting the consumers..And there is A high risk of losing job in the way he is hampering his Job to think
Jose the time thinking about the car, and time loses their job at the restaurant.
What is the restaurant?
A “restaurant” is a location where people eat food. Waiters offered services in the restaurant, and customers ordered food. People exchange services with the help of money. Customers are drawn in by the restaurant's atmosphere, service, and food. A restaurant is the provided the food with cleanliness and more hygiene.
Jose largely affected himself because he did not take care of the job. Jose was constantly concerned that the new car was not working well at her job. Most customers are hardly impacted. As a result, Jose was impacted whenever he lost his job at the restaurant.
As a result, Jose impacted himself because he all the time thinking for the new car. He was the not 100% concentrate her job are more chances to loss her restaurant job.
Learn more about the restaurant, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27316334
#SPJ2
what are some qualities Electrical Engineers need? Check all that apply.
knowledge of life sciences
attention to detail
understanding of government guidelines
knowledge of computers and electronics
aptitude for problem solving
ability to convince and persuade others
negotiation skills
Answer: attention to detail
understanding of government guidelines
knowledge of computers and electronics
aptitude for problem solving
Explanation:
Electrical engineers are the engineers that are responsible for designing, developing, electrical equipment, that are manufactured.
Some qualities that electrical engineers must have include the fact that they must be able to pay attention to details, have knowledge of computers, understand government guidelines and be able to solve problems.
Answer:
b c d e
Explanation:
is correct pros to guy above me
The police training officer (PTO) programs, in contrast to others, stress _____.
community policing techniques and principles
critical-thinking skills as they apply to police work
the physical work of policing
administrative aspects of police work
B) "critical-thinking skills as they apply to police work" is the right answer
Answer:
critical-thinking skills as they apply to police work
Explanation:
When consitutional objections are raised within an administrative proceeding concerning an agency's rules or procedures, that issue will be decided initially by
When constitutional objections are raised within an administrative proceeding concerning an agency's rules or procedures, that issue will initially be decided by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) or the agency head, depending on the specific agency's organizational structure and the nature of the proceeding.
Administrative proceedings involve disputes between individuals or organizations and administrative agencies. These agencies have the power to create rules, adjudicate disputes, and enforce regulations as granted to them by the legislative and executive branches of the government. When a party believes that an agency's rules or procedures violate the constitution, they can raise these objections during the administrative proceeding.
Administrative Law Judges are impartial decision-makers who oversee the administrative proceeding and ensure that the process is fair and adheres to relevant laws and regulations. They possess the authority to make initial determinations on constitutional objections, which can be further appealed within the agency or ultimately to a judicial court.
The agency head, who is typically responsible for the overall management and direction of the agency, may also have the authority to decide on constitutional objections in some cases. This could occur when the agency's organizational structure allows the head to review ALJ decisions or when the agency head is directly involved in the adjudication process.
In summary, constitutional objections raised within an administrative proceeding concerning an agency's rules or procedures will initially be decided by either an Administrative Law Judge or the agency head, depending on the specific circumstances and the agency's structure. This decision may be subject to further review and appeal within the agency or the judicial system.
Learn more about Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) here:
https://brainly.com/question/14552070
#SPJ11
which of the following acts created the securities and exchange commission? the securities act of 1933 the securities exchange act of 1934 the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002 the insider trading and securities fraud enforcement act of 1988
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an autonomous regulatory body in the United States of America that oversees and implements the nation's securities laws. The SEC, which was created under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, has a three-part mission: to defend investors, to keep reasonable, orderly, and efficient markets, and to assist capital creation.
The SEC regulates all aspects of the securities industry, including the exchanges on which they are traded, investment advisers, and mutual funds. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regulates the secondary market for securities, which are transactions between buyers and sellers in the securities markets.
It created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to enforce securities regulations and ensure that market participants follow the rules. It also established various investor protections, such as registration requirements for securities exchanges and brokers, as well as disclosure standards for publicly traded firms.
Learn more about Securities Exchange Act https://brainly.com/question/9089676
#SPJ11
Elsa, 26 years of age, was employed as a rigger for Frozen Pty Ltd. While she operated one crane at work, she was struck in the face by a heavy steel chain which slipped out from a machine operated by another crane worker. The blow to her face rendered her unconscious for several minutes. The blow also broke bones in her nose and cheeks. She spent 12 days in hospital, including having cranial surgery to insert plates. From the surgery, she has scarring over her head mostly behind her hairline. She has been left virtually blind in her left eye. She has lost sensation on the left side of her forehead and cheek. She lost her sense of smell and, because of that, most of her sense of taste. She has some degree of memory impairment and some
mood effects. After four months, she had recovered sufficiently to return to her work as a rigger, on light duties. A month later, she was back to working full hours and after another month, she was doing her full pre-injury duties. Nevertheless, she no longer felt comfortable performing those duties and, in any event, was offered new employment in a field she had been pursuing for some years, working as a construction supervisor in a large building company. She took up that employment in November 2015, earning a higher salary than she earned in her previous employment as a rigger. However, Elsa found that although she really enjoyed the new job, her health problems from the original accident at Frozen Pty Ltd worsened while at her new job
which meant that she had to leave. Elsa now wants to sue Frozen Ply Ltd in negligence for injuries sustained from her
original workplace injuries Task: Advise whether Elsa may be successful in a claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence. Discuss the relevance of vicarious liability and any defences which may be raised by Frozen Pty Ltd as part of
your response. Use case references to support your answer.
Elsa may have a viable claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence against Frozen Pty Ltd. The employer has a duty of care towards its employees to provide a safe working environment and take reasonable measures to prevent accidents and injuries.
Vicarious liability may be relevant in this case, as it holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Frozen Pty Ltd may raise defenses to mitigate or avoid liability. One possible defense is contributory negligence, arguing that Elsa's own actions or conduct contributed to the injuries. However, the severity of the injuries and the fact that Elsa was simply performing her job duties as a rigger may weaken this defense.
Case references and further legal analysis would be necessary to fully assess Elsa's chances of success in her claim. Consulting with a legal professional specializing in personal injury law would provide a comprehensive evaluation of the specific circumstances and applicable laws in this jurisdiction to determine the strength of Elsa's case.
Learn more about jurisdiction : brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
1. Compare and contrast the structures, powers, and functions of both houses of Congress and explain how this impacts
the policy-making process.
Answer:
The United States Congress consists of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Here are some key differences between the two houses:
1. **Structure:** The House of Representatives has 435 voting members, each representing a congressional district in their state, with the number of representatives per state based on its population. The Senate, on the other hand, has 100 voting members, with two senators from each state.
2. **Powers:** The House of Representatives has the power to initiate revenue bills, impeach federal officials, and elect the President in the event of an Electoral College tie. The Senate has the power to approve treaties, confirm presidential nominations for federal positions, and hold impeachment trials.
3. **Functions:** Both houses of Congress have the power to pass laws, but the process is different for each. The House of Representatives typically initiates legislation, which must then be passed by the Senate before it can be sent to the President for approval or veto. The Senate has the power to propose amendments to legislation passed by the House, and the two houses must reconcile any differences between their versions of the bill before it can become law.
The differences in structure, powers, and functions of the two houses of Congress can impact the policy-making process in several ways:
1. **Representation:** The House of Representatives is designed to be more representative of the people, with representatives elected directly by the people in their districts. This means that the House may be more responsive to the needs and desires of the people than the Senate, which is composed of two senators per state regardless of population.
2. **Checks and balances:** The different powers held by each house of Congress provide a system of checks and balances that helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. For example, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach federal officials, while the Senate has the power to hold impeachment trials.
3. **Gridlock:** The different processes for passing legislation in each house of Congress can sometimes lead to gridlock and slow down the policy-making process. For example, if the House and Senate cannot agree on a version of a bill, it may not be able to become law.
In summary, the structure, powers, and functions of the two houses of Congress can impact the policy-making process in significant ways. The different representation, powers, and processes of each house can provide checks and balances, prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful, and help ensure that legislation represents the interests of the people. However, the differences can also lead to gridlock and slow down the policy-making process.
How long does it take an asteroid to complete one orbit around the sun if its orbital distance (semimajor axis) from the sun is 4 AU?
An asteroid with a semimajor axis of 4 AU would take approximately 8 years to complete one orbit around the Sun (found using Kepler's Third Law).
The time it takes for an asteroid to complete one orbit around the Sun depends on its distance from the Sun and is described by Kepler's Third Law. The law states that the square of the period of an object's orbit is proportional to the cube of its semimajor axis.
In this case, the asteroid's orbital distance (semimajor axis) from the Sun is 4 astronomical units (AU), which is equivalent to 4 times the average distance between the Earth and the Sun. Using Kepler's Third Law, we can calculate the asteroid's orbital period as follows:
(T^2)/(a^3) = (P^2)/(A^3)
where T is the asteroid's orbital period, a is its semimajor axis, P is the period of Earth's orbit around the Sun (which is approximately 365.25 days), and A is the average distance between the Earth and the Sun (which is approximately 1 AU).
Plugging in the values, we get:
(T^2)/ (4^3) = (365.25^2)/(1^3)
(T^2)/64 = 133,225.06
T^2 = 8,519,364.64
T = √8,519,364.64
T = 2,919.36 days or approximately 8 years.
To know more about Kepler's Third Law, click here: https://brainly.com/question/6867220
#SPJ4
With reference to the relevant provision of law, discuss whether the death penalty is against human rights.
Answer:
The U.S. death penalty system flagrantly violates human rights law. It is often applied in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner without affording vital due process rights. Moreover, methods of execution and death row conditions have been condemned as cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment and even torture.
Explanation:
Does the president have the power to lead the U.S. Armed Forces? Or is that up to the Congress?
Answer:
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors. Commander-in-chief. The president of the United States is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces and as such exercises supreme operational command over all national military forces of the United States.
Mayra offers to sell her home to Hanna for "about $100,000 plus closing costs" Hanna accepts Mayra's offer. Later, a dispute arises over the precise dollar amount
The way a court will resolve this dispute is e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
What makes a binding contract?For a contract to be considered legally binding on the parties, it must comply with the elements of contracts, including:A consideration is a promise of some valuable thing offered by a promissor in exchange for something of value by a promisee.
The rules of consideration ensure that there is a mutual agreement between the promisor and the promisee about its value and also in the eyes of the law.
Thus, in this case, the court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
Learn more about vague considerations in contracts at https://brainly.com/question/17083291
#SPJ1
Question Completion with Answer Options:
Hanna accepts Mayra's offer but later, a dispute arises concerning the precise dollar amount of the purchase price. How will a court resolve this dispute?
a) The court will determine a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.
b) The court will determine that Hanna pays only the figures mentioned in the contract.
c) The court will appoint a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the price to be paid by Hanna.
d) The court will require Hanna to pay the average of her price and Mayra's price.
e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract
if you become the minister of the government of nepal what will you do
Answer:
best answer ever
Explanation:
So, if I am Prime minister of ..... l, I may do the following things, and again, just because a PM says or does something doesn’t mean it happens automatically, you have to deal with individual ministries and civil servants, media, the opposition party, judiciary, and others, It’s not a dictatorship where things get done just by speaking. Anyway, here are a few things.
Rule of law: Yes, that’s my priority to ensure that Constitution and laws are applied to everybody, rich and poor, politically connected, and others. This will be very difficult in the case of a coalition Govt but it can be done in a majority Govt with strong will and good ministers in various places. What can be done?? Well, we can first start by prosecuting previous cases of violation of rule of law by powerful politicians and others, media can help in that. Giving resources to public prosecutors and hiring good people so that accused are punished. Increasing punishment for things like corruption (It’s just 2 years in Nepal for big corruption) can also help. it must be assured that nobody is above the law and that way, their faith in Govt and democracy will be restored a bit.
Expedite construction projects: We have too many problems in Nepal with slow approval process or red tape regulation and also with procurement and contractors, among others which delays vital projects like building roads, airports, bridges, pipelines for water among others and even if they are built, it’s of less quality because a lot of money is being wasted on commission and there is corruption. I will create a task force of expert people from all relevant backgrounds to suggest ways to expedite construction projects including Hydropower projects, try to find out root problems and how to address them, see if the problems are politicians bureaucrats or private sector, and give me ways. A PM cannot know everything and we need to rely on experts for a solution. One of the biggest problems in Nepal is that politicians here including PM believe only they are real experts and don’t need help from anybody. We need to change that approach.
Electricity generation: This is a must for economic development in Nepal because without electricity there can be no industrialization. As everyone knows, Nepal has a huge potential in hydroelectricity which is renewable but big projects have been delayed for a long time. We need to expedite such big projects but also help the private sector build small hydropower projects in small communities to make them itself-sufficientient. Nepal’s total hydropower generation many says is around 80,000 MW (I am not sure, need to look at that as well) and many in Nepal say, we must build hydropower projects to then immediately sell to India. I think, first, we should make Nepal self-sufficient and then only think about other Countries. Electricity can be used not just for regular stuff but also for industries, we can give thousands of MW to industries in Nepal that will employ millions of good-paying jobs in Nepal, we can use electricity to make Nepal a leader in electric vehicles, and using renewables. We import billions of petroleum from India, if we can only try to reduce it by using electric vehicles, esp in Kathmandu, it will make a difference. Again, these are long-term projects and only a PM cannot do anything, huge amount of cooperation is needed on all sides, from Nepali people to the private sector. Nepal govt can always give incentives like custom-free electric vehicles that are cheap to tax credits for companies among others.
49. China has indicated that it may invade and forcefully unify Taiwan, who is a strong U.S. business partner. U.S. ________ ________over that last several decades has over that last several decades has.
A. Foreign policy
B. Military policy
C. Asia policy
D. Pacific policy
The United States, option (A): foreign policy over the last several decades relations between Taiwan and the United States became unofficial and informal during the Communist Party of China's leadership as "China" in 1979.
What is the relationship between the United States and Taiwan?Despite the fact that the US does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, we have a strong unofficial relationship and a long-term interest in sustaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
A policy of deliberate ambiguity in the United States (US) foreign policy toward Taiwan is necessary to maintain cross-strait relations and, if possible, to protect Taiwan from the People's Republic of China invasion, whereas a policy of comprehensive clarity on Taiwan would likely provoke the People's Republic of China challenges and opposition to the United States (US) legitimacy in East Asia and beyond.
Check out the link below to learn more about US foreign policy;
https://brainly.com/question/19393069
#SPJ1
There are endless consequences of being an "inmate," "prisoner," "convict," etc. Pick what you consider to be the 3 biggest problems for these individuals when they leave incarceration and return to their communities.
In your own words, explain how beef prices could come down. (10 points)
The prices of beef will fall down when consumers purchase other things like fish, pork, etc.
How to illustrate the information?It should be noted that there is a common term in Economics that implies that the price of a particular good will increase when there's more demand for the product. On the other hand, there'll be a reduction in the price when the quantity that's demanded by the consumers increase.
In this case, due to the fact the beef is almost sought after in every household, there'll always be an increase in the price of the good. Therefore, in such a situation, it's important for consumers to consume other products that can serve the same purpose. It should be noted that the examples of such products are fishes, pork, etc.
This will help in reducing the price. Also, an increase in the number of cows can also help to reduce the price. When there's more supply, there'll be a reduction in the price.
Learn more about price on:
brainly.com/question/1153322
#SPJ1
a rational theory of a crime is based on a) inductive reasoning b) deductive reasoning c) analogical reasoning d) syllogistic reasoning
The rational theory of a crime is based on: b) deductive reasoning. So, option b is correct.
Deductive reasoning is a logical process where specific conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises. In the context of a rational theory of a crime, deductive reasoning is used to examine the motivations, decision-making process, and thought patterns of individuals who engage in criminal behavior. It involves starting with general principles or assumptions about human behavior and applying them to a specific situation to draw conclusions about the individual's reasoning behind committing the crime.
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, while analogical reasoning involves making comparisons between similar situations or cases. Syllogistic reasoning refers to a form of deductive reasoning that involves drawing specific conclusions from two or more premises. However, in the context of a rational theory of crime, deductive reasoning is the primary mode of reasoning used to understand the underlying motivations and reasoning behind criminal acts. So, option b is correct.
To learn more about deductive reasoning, here:
https://brainly.com/question/7284582
#SPJ11
Choose which law enforcement official typically performs the service of overseeing the behavior
and improvement of the offender.
What’s the answer?
Answer:
Probation officer
Explanation:
The use of alcohol can cause____
Answer:
sugar diebetis
Explanation:
As we can say alcohol contain a lot of C6,H12,O6
Identify the sections of the Fair Work Act that provide the FWC with their ‘bullying jurisdiction’ - specifically the sections dealing with ‘worker’ and understand what is meant by a ‘constitutionally covered business’.
Identify the ‘eligibility’ requirements to make a claim.
Explain some of the ‘defences’ available to a respondent in a bullying claim.
What are the remedies available in this FW Act jurisdiction?
Under the Fair Work Act 2009, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) is granted jurisdiction over bullying cases through specific sections. The correct answers are:
1. The sections of the Fair Work Act that provide the FWC with their 'bullying jurisdiction' are 789FD, 789FC, and 789FE.
2. A 'constitutionally covered business' refers to organizations within the constitutional powers of the Australian government for industrial relations regulation.
3. The eligibility requirements to make a bullying claim include being covered by the Act and experiencing bullying conduct at work.
4. Some defenses available to a respondent in a bullying claim include reasonable management action, reasonable disciplinary action, and reasonable exercise of lawful authority.
5. Remedies available in the FW Act jurisdiction for bullying cases include orders to stop bullying behavior, implementing preventive measures, providing training, and recommending compensation for the affected worker.
Section 789FD defines bullying at work, while section 789FC clarifies the meaning of a "worker" within the Act. Section 789FE outlines the concept of a "constitutionally covered business," referring to organizations falling within the constitutional powers of the Australian government for industrial relations regulation. To make a bullying claim, the worker must meet eligibility requirements such as being covered by the Act and experiencing bullying conduct at work.
Respondents in bullying claims can assert defenses such as reasonable management action, reasonable disciplinary action, or reasonable exercise of lawful authority. If a bullying claim is substantiated, the FWC can impose remedies, including orders to stop bullying behavior, implementing preventive measures, provide training, and recommending compensation for the affected worker.
For more details regarding Fair Work Commission, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1346625
#SPJ4
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1