Answers
Related Questions
When a product fails to perform as warranted, this is called a) contractual liability. O b) product malfunction. c) malicious manufacture. d) breach of warranty
Answers
I think it's d because an example of breach of warranty is: A salesman tells you that a washing machine makes no noise, but when you buy it, you find that it makes a lot of noise.
Hope this helps! Please give brainlist
Administrative law consists of the rules, orders, and decisions of the president. true or false
Answers
Answer: True
Explanation: Administrative law- Consists of the rules, orders, and decisions of administrative agencies. Dominant element in the regulatory environment of business.Administrative agency- A federal, state, or local government agency established to perform a specific function.Federal Agencies-At the national level, the cabinet departments of the executive branch include numerous executive agencies. Food and drug administration is an example is an agency within the US department of Health and Human services, theseexecutive agencies are subject to the authority of the president, who has the power to appoint and remove their officers.
after meeting all regulatory requirements of the federal and state governments and the fed, a bank may then begin operations and ____.
Answers
After meeting all regulatory requirements of the federal and state governments and the fed, a bank may then begin operations and business.
a government is a machine or group of people governing an organized network, generally a nation. in the case of its broad associative definition, authorities commonly consists of legislature, government, and judiciary. authorities is a means by using which organizational regulations are enforced, as well as a mechanism for figuring out policy. In many countries, the authorities has a sort of charter, a announcement of its governing ideas and philosophy. whilst all kinds of groups have governance, the time period government is regularly used greater in particular to refer to the about 200 unbiased countrywide governments and subsidiary companies.
Learn more about governments here
https://brainly.com/question/25192887
#SPJ4
Question 5 of
When you drive in the city, there is a lot going on. Which of the following a driver must do?
Answers
Answer:
The driver should focus on his driving, or there is a change of a car accident.
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND THANKS
Income tax - 20%
Property tax - 2%
Sales Tax - 8%
Frank Ramos
Occupation - Dentist
Annual Salary - $78,000
Recently purchased $500 tablet for his sons birthday, a 10$ collar for his dog and 20$ pizza buffet lunch for his family
owns a $240,000 home
What are Franks property taxes for this year?
Answers
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
The outside wall of the Town Court has a mural of the American flag, Twin Towers, and screeching bald eagle painted on it by members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. One night, Russ Toleum spray paints a message over every aspect of the mural. The message is, “Canada – like America but Better, Eh.” The security cameras on the property clearly pick up Russ’s face and he is charged with defacing public property. Russ claims he was merely adding to the mural that was already there and that his right to free speech has been violated. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court.
Answers
Answer:
It is a crime to deface public property, because it isn't yours personally. How would Russ like it if someone spray painted something offensive on his car? They were just expressing free speech! "Free Speech" Is not an excuse to commit a crime, Free Speech is just the liberty of saying what you want whether it's controversial or not.
Explanation:
Charles offered to shovel snow from Wilma’s driveway after she sprained her ankle late in January. For the remainder of January and throughout February, true to his word, Charles shoveled her driveway approximately 5 times. On March 1, when Wilma’s ankle had sufficiently healed and she was able to look after her driveway again, Wilma told Charles how thankful she was for his efforts and that she would give him $20 for each time he shoveled her driveway (or a total of $100). Charles accepted Wilma's offer, but later Wilma refused to pay the money. Can Charles force Wilma to pay?
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
yes, Charles can force Wilma to pay because she promised him to pay him cause she was thankful of him shoveling.In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
Ignoring the actions and behaviors of a potential harasser is an
effective method for preventing future harassment.
True
False
Answers
A flashlight with a rechargeable battery promises to work for 24 straight hours on a full charge. This guarantee of performance is considered a:
A.
warranty of merchantability
B.
express warranty
C.
implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
D.
warranty contract
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation: don't have one
Explain the statement, "If we didn't
have government, we'd invent it" and
support your explanation with
evidence.
Answers
In Texas, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when _______________
Answers
In Texas, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when you are caught speeding in a work zone.
What is Work Zone?An region of a trafficway containing construction, maintenance, or utility work is known as a work zone. Signs, channeling systems, barriers, pavement markers, and/or work vehicles are frequently used to designate a work zone.
The standard fine is doubled if you are caught speeding in a construction zone. If there are any construction employees present, the penalties may be as high as $1,000. A $200 fine is assessed for driving in a construction zone. A speeding violation in a construction zone can result in fines of more than $2,000 in some cases.
Therefore, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when an any work is in progress or construction workers are present.
To learn more about Work Zone, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3909716
#SPJ2
the person who acquires real property under the terms of a will is known as a
Answers
Answer:
Devisee
Explanation:
Devisee is the term associated to the individual who is left with the real estate property according to the terms of the bill. A devisee may or may not be related with the decedent. It is because of the presence of devisee in the will of the decedent that the devisee receives the property and becomes the owner of it. In the case where the property is left with with the devisee becomes the owner.
some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches. given this development, what law gave the states the legal framework to do this? what additional law closed a potential loophole in interstate banking? what law changed these restrictions?
Answers
The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.
Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?
After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.
What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?
Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Learn more about banking here:
https://brainly.com/question/25642105
#SPJ4
which one of the following statements regarding the right to freedom of association is correct?
1)An employer may give an employee a bonus as exchange for him or her not exercising the right to freedom of association.
2)Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unioun.
3)The right of workers to freedom of association is only protected in terms of the constitution.
4)Close shop agreement are unconstitutional as the infringe workers right to freedom of association.
Answers
Answer:
The correct answer is 2. Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unions.
Explanation:
The freedom of association is a fundamental right for groups of people, which has been formulated in various places. This fundamental right is sometimes used in conjunction with the freedom of assembly.
With the emergence of the new, large and important class in the form of industrial workers, there was a greater awareness of the essence of freedom, which was reflected in freedom of speech, freedom of the press and thus freedom of association. At that time it was about the principle that workers and other citizens can unite in a group (trade unions, political parties) that promote the interests of this group of people. Freedom of association is a logical feature of a liberal vision because it represents the ultimate means of exerting (political) pressure on government and society. Without this right one would not have been able to participate in the governance of a country or company. That is why this right became essential for the formation of a democratic, liberal state.
A borrower questions the amount of the notary fee appearing on the settlement the notary agent should do what next?
Answers
Answer:
The Notary Signing Agent should: Recommend that the borrower contact the lender's representative before signing the documents.
How do the definitions of Permissiveness, Prohibition and Regulation relate to the 2018 changes to Canadian Law and Cannabis?
Answers
The changes to Canadian Law related to cannabis can be classified as a combination of permissiveness, prohibition, and regulation.
Permissiveness is seen in the decision to legalize recreational cannabis use and production across the country. Prohibition is seen in the regulations that limit the age of those allowed to consume cannabis, the amount of cannabis able to be carried in public, and the public places it is forbidden to consume or produce.
Regulation is seen in the federal and provincial frameworks that control the production, distribution, sale, and consumption of cannabis; such as age and quantity limitations, taxation, and packaging protocols. This combination of regulatory structures serves to protect the public health while simultaneously allowing access to a previously unavailable market.
To know more about Canadian Law , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30537159
#SPJ4
Joe was a respiratory therapist in a nursing home. He controlled the ventilation equipment that kept some of his patients breathing. One day, to show the importance of his job to his girlfriend, Joe, without permission or warning, completely cut off the ventilator support to a severely ill patient. Within a few moments, the patient began to gasp for air and nearly lost consciousness before a nurse ordered Joe to restore the ventilator’s function.
Did Joe violate civil law or criminal law or both?
Answers
what kind of court case uses the "preponderance of the evidence" standard?
Answers
In almost all the civil cases, the court uses the “preponderance of the evidence” standard.
In civil cases, the preponderance of the evidence is a standard of proof or standard of evidence. Cases involving civil trials often include non-criminal issues, it provides a preponderance of the evidence in a civil case.
Preponderance of the evidence is the accepted standard of proof in civil tort lawsuits. When there is a preponderance of the evidence, the defendant is most likely to be held legally accountable for the plaintiff's injuries.
The standard of proof used in the majority of civil disputes, according to which the party with the burden of proof must submit evidence that is more reliable and persuasive than that offered by the other party, or that demonstrates that the claimed fact is more likely than not.
Therefore, The court applies the “preponderance of the evidence” test in practically all civil cases.
Learn more about the civil cases, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4085935
#SPJ4
True or False.
1. In a typical day, police officers cover muc
private security officers.
Answers
Answer:
Answer is false
Explanation:
As video games have become more advanced, some of the games have also increased in violence. While the games are rated, many of the advertisements for the games are targeted for a market who are not supposed to buy them under the rating system. Discuss the ethical issues in these marketing strategies. Thoroughly analyze this issue under one of the ethical models contained in Chapter 2, Section 2-4.
Answers
One ethical model that can be applied to analyze the issue of marketing violent video games to an inappropriate target audience is the Utilitarian ethical framework.
Utilitarianism focuses on maximizing overall happiness or utility for the greatest number of people.
In the context of marketing violent video games, there are several ethical concerns that can be examined using the Utilitarian perspective:
1. Potential Harm to Minors: Marketing violent video games to a target audience that is not supposed to purchase them under the rating system raises ethical concerns about the potential harm caused to minors. Exposure to violent content at a young age can have negative effects on their psychological well-being and behavior.
From a Utilitarian standpoint, this raises the question of whether the potential enjoyment and satisfaction of adult consumers outweigh the potential harm caused to minors.
2. Informed Decision-Making: Effective marketing techniques can influence consumer choices and shape their preferences. If advertisements for violent video games are intentionally designed to target an audience that is not mature enough to handle or understand the content,
it raises concerns about whether the consumers are able to make informed decisions. From a Utilitarian perspective, this undermines the principle of maximizing overall happiness by potentially leading individuals to make choices that are not in their best interest.
3. Social Implications: Violent video games have been a subject of debate regarding their impact on society, including concerns about desensitization to violence and potential for increased aggression. If marketing strategies contribute to the wider accessibility and exposure of violent content to inappropriate age groups, it can exacerbate these societal issues. From a Utilitarian standpoint, the ethical question becomes whether the potential satisfaction and enjoyment of adult consumers outweigh the potential negative impact on society as a whole.
In analyzing these issues under Utilitarianism, one would consider the overall balance of happiness and well-being. In this case, the potential harm caused to minors and the negative societal implications of marketing violent video games to an inappropriate target audience could outweigh the enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by adult consumers. Therefore, from a Utilitarian perspective, there may be ethical concerns with marketing strategies that disregard age restrictions and target an audience not meant to purchase such games.
Ultimately, ethical decisions regarding marketing strategies for violent video games should consider the potential consequences on various shareholders, including minors, adult consumers, and society as a whole, while aiming to maximize overall happiness and well-being.
Learn more about shareholder here: brainly.com/question/32134220
#SPJ11
Describe the parts of the medieval court system which are still used in our american court system today.
Answers
The American legal system still uses a judge and jury, two components of the medieval court system.
The federal and state branches of the American judiciary are set up differently. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the Republic, with input from the Federal Senate and the National Bar Association, rather than elected, which is how they are chosen in most states. The concept of judges has been around since the Middle Ages.
A judge-led jury in the US is also used to present civil and criminal cases to potential jurors. Additionally, since the Middle Ages, this trait has been prevalent.
The judge serves as the law's ultimate arbiter. It is the judge's responsibility to state the law in a positive manner. When it comes to the presentation of evidence by counsel during a trial, the judge acts as an impartial "umpire." Additionally, the judge must decide on admissibility and instruct the jury on how to apply the law. The judge is also responsible for maintaining discipline in the courtroom. On rare occasions, the judge may also serve as the fact-finder if all parties agree. A "bench trial" is what this is. With the Senate's "advice and consent," the President appoints judges to federal courts. The electorate chooses a large number of state court judges.In most trials, the facts are decided by the jury, a group of local citizens. The jury will receive legal instructions from the judge, and in order to reach a verdict, the members will evaluate the facts as they see them in the context of the legal guidelines.Learn more about Jury, here
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ4
Should states have the autonomy to decide whether they teach about CRT or is this topic so important/central to the principles of justice in the U.S. that states should not have a choice in the matter and it should be mandated curriculum by the Federal Government, similar to Math and English?
Is CRT too divisive, and does it sensationalize the ideas and importance of race in our society such that any benefit that may be derived from its use is outweighed by the harm it causes to students?
Answers
Answer:
CRT is a topic that is central to the principles of justice in the United States, and it is important for students to understand the role that race has played in shaping our society and institutions. Therefore, it could be argued that CRT should be mandated as part of the curriculum by the federal government, similar to math and English.
As for the second question, the use of CRT in the classroom can be controversial, and some people believe that it is too divisive and sensationalizes the importance of race in our society. However, it is important to recognize that racism and its effects are real, and it is crucial for students to understand the ways in which race has influenced history and society. While there may be some harm caused by discussing difficult and uncomfortable topics, the benefits of teaching CRT far outweigh the potential harm, as it can help students become more informed and empathetic citizens.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate regarding CRT, it is ultimately important for students to have a comprehensive understanding of race and its impact on society. Therefore, it may be necessary for the federal government to mandate the teaching of CRT in schools, while also ensuring that it is taught in a way that promotes empathy, understanding, and critical thinking.
Explanation:
how science prevail over common sense?
Answers
Answer:
The difference between common sense and science. Plainly stated common sense is information gathered from everyday knowledge and science is thorough research on a particular subject with concluded facts.
The reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it,
Basically, a common sense means a conventional intelligence that people gathered from everyday situations, events etc.
Science mean a knowledge about our world based on facts learned through numerous experiments, observation etc.
In conclusion, the reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it.
Read more about Science
brainly.com/question/17216882
Taxpayers may look at Committee Reports to determine the intent of Congress. True False
Answers
It is true that Taxpayers may look at Committee Reports to determine the intent of Congress.
There are 435 elected members of the House of Representatives, who are distributed among the 50 states in proportion to their populations. The District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and four additional American territories are represented by the six non-voting members who make up the body. The Speaker of the House, who is chosen by the Representatives, serves as the chamber's presiding authority. He or she comes third in the presidential succession.
Members of the House must be 25 years old, citizens of the United States for at least seven years, and residents of the state (though not necessarily the district) they represent. They are elected every two years.
To know more about Congress:
https://brainly.com/question/14329031
#SPJ4
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Answers
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
Every time you prepare to drive, before you start the engine of your parked vehicle you must make sure the vehicle is in Park or Neutral gear. High gear. Low gear.
Answers
Before starting the engine of a parked vehicle, it is important to make sure that the vehicle is in either Park or Neutral gear.
When preparing to drive, it is important to ensure that the vehicle is in either Park or Neutral gear before starting the engine. This is because starting the engine in any other gear can cause the car to move unexpectedly, potentially leading to an accident.
Park is the ideal gear for automatic transmission vehicles, as it locks the transmission and prevents the wheels from moving. In manual transmission vehicles, Neutral is the safest gear to start the engine in, as it disconnects the engine from the wheels. It is important to always follow this step to ensure a safe driving experience.
Learn more about Neutral gear: https://brainly.com/question/31927758
#SPJ11
Which of the following is true of an Authoritarian government?
Answers
Answer:
you need to put the options
Explanation:
police suspected that a man was engaged in large-scale drug distribution. while the man was away, an officer entered his apartment without a warrant to see if he could find evidence of drug dealing. inside the man's apartment, the officer discovered a ledger that appeared to contain records of drug transactions. written inside the ledger was the name of a prominent local businessman. the officer then located and questioned the businessman, who admitted that he had bought drugs from the man on numerous occasions. the businessman arranged for the man and the officer to run into each other at a local nightclub. the officer asked the man how he and the businessmen knew each other, and the man, unaware of the officer's identity, informed the officer that he sold the businessman drugs and bragged that he had hundreds of customers. based solely on the officer's testimony, which reflected the above events, the grand jury returned an indictment against the man for drug distribution. if the man's attorney files a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the man's constitutional rights were violated, should the court grant the motion?
Answers
Based on the given scenario, it is highly likely that the court would grant the motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the man's constitutional rights were violated.
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. In this case, the officer entered the man's apartment without a warrant while the man was away. This action is a clear violation of the man's Fourth Amendment rights, as there were no exigent circumstances or legal justification for the warrantless entry.
Additionally, the officer's subsequent questioning of the businessman, arranging a meeting between the man and the officer, and eliciting incriminating statements from the man without informing him of his Miranda rights raise concerns about violations of the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
The evidence obtained as a result of these constitutional violations, namely the discovery of the ledger and the incriminating statements made by the man, would likely be considered fruit of the poisonous tree and inadmissible in court. Therefore, the man's attorney would have a strong basis for filing a motion to dismiss the indictment, asserting that the man's constitutional rights were violated during the investigation.
For more question on constitutional rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8562924
#SPJ8