When did people 18 21 get the right to vote?

The following statement "A town council wants to estimate the proportion of residents who are in favor of a proposal to upgrade the computers in the town library" is False.

A computer is a machine that may be programmed to do arithmetic or logic operations automatically. A programme is the general set of operations that may be performed by a contemporary digital electronic computer. These apps enable your computer to carry out a variety of activities.

A computer system is a theoretically complete computer that comprises all of the essential hardware, operating system, and peripherals. This formula may also be applied to a group of computers that are linked and cooperating. A computer network or cluster of computers. Computers are used to operate a wide range of industrial and consumer equipment.

To know more about Computer here-

https://brainly.com/question/21080395

#SPJ4

In a sex discrimination lawsuit settled in 2010, walmart agreed to pay nearly $12 million. the eeoc alleged that walmart did all of the following except candidates were informed that women were more suitable for jobs filling orders.

Federal laws prohibiting discrimination against job applicants or employees on the basis of their race, colour, religion, sex (including pregnancy and conditions related to it, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, or genetic information are enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

Most businesses with at least 15 workers are subject to EEOC legislation (20 employees in cases of age discrimination). Most employment agencies and labour unions are also covered.

All workplace activities, such as hiring, firing, promotions, harassment, training, pay, and benefits, are subject to the laws.

To know more about sex discrimination lawsuit:

https://brainly.com/question/31944958

#SPJ4

These cases are related to the criminal justice system of United States. The founding's of the supreme court in the form of constitutional arguments is highlighted.

Furman v. Georgia 1972 - The main constitutional question in this case was whether the death penalty was being applied in a way that violated the eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment by being applied in a discriminatory manner. The Supreme Court ruled that all current death penalty laws are unconstitutional after concluding that the death penalty is being used arbitrarily and capriciously.

Gregg v. Georgia 1976 - Whether the death penalty, as modified by the state of Georgia was constitutional was at issue in this case. The Supreme Court ruled that the revised death penalty statute was constitutional and did not contravene the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment because it provided for a segmented trial process with specific aggravating and mitigating factors.

The constitutional question in Coker v. Georgia (1977) was whether the death penalty was an appropriate sentence. The death penalty was deemed to be an excessive punishment for serious crimes by the Supreme Court, and it also violated the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

The main constitutional question in McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) was whether statistical proof of racial bias in the execution of death sentences was sufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove a constitutional violation.

Arizona v. Ring (2002) - In this case, the legal issue was whether the fact based determinations required to impose the death penalty must be made by a jury rather than a judge. The Supreme Court ruled that in order to impose the death penalty, factual findings must be made by a jury, not a judge, in accordance with the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a jury trial.

In 2002 Atkins v. Virginia The Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment was at issue in this case's constitutionality which involved the execution of defendants who had intellectual disabilities. Such executions, according to the Supreme Court, violated the Eighth Amendment and were therefore unconstitutional.

The main constitutional query raised in Roper v. Simmons 2005 was whether the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment applied to defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes. According to the Supreme Court it is unconstitutional to execute defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes.

The legal question in Witherspoon v. Illinois 1968 was whether potential jurors who expressed opposition to the death penalty could be barred from a capital trial. According to the Supreme Court, such jurors cannot be automatically disqualified rather, they can only be disqualified if their stance on the death penalty would prevent them from upholding the law and applying the death penalty when necessary.

Florida v. Hurst (2016) - The Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial was at stake in this case and it was unclear whether Florida's death penalty sentencing policy was constitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that the plan was unconstitutional because it gave a judge the authority to determine the facts necessary to impose the death penalty rather than a jury.

Learn more about supreme court at:

brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ1

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

Candidates carry out election campaigns using different ways and mediums such as open discussion, advertisements, theme music, political rallies, debates, etc.

An election campaign is an organized effort carried out to influence the decision-making process of a particular group about who or what political party to vote for in an election.

The main goal of an election campaign is to persuade voters to vote for the best representative for a position or office.

Some of the ways that candidates campaign for election include:

Election campaigns can be carried out using the media, banners, social media, and other technologies.

The main point is communicating to the people in order to mobilize support for a candidate or political party.

Learn more about election campaigns at brainly.com/question/29783494.

#SPJ1

My overall opinions on music theft on the internet are that it: Causes loss to the musicians and artists. Yes, illegally downloading is equivalent to theft.

Music theft also leads to dramatically lowers music sales, which is detrimental to the music industry; Demotivates the musicians and artists who are already working hard.

The recorded music industry has suffered a dramatic fall in revenue since Napster. Industry groups have stated that piracy is to blame for this drop in sales and that the weakened copyright protection for recorded music will actually lead to a decrease in the amount of new music that is produced on the market.

Most observers agree that technological development has severely diminished the degree of protection that copyright gives since 1999. Much of the research in this field has aimed to document the impact of file sharing on the music industry's earnings. What has happened to the supply of new music in the ten years since file sharing, though, is a different and possibly more significant topic.

To know more about music theft:

https://brainly.com/question/32979793

#SPJ4

Answer:

A counterclaim helps support the writer position in an argumentative essay because The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect, as you write, think about your audience.

Answer:

The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect.

Explanation:

edge 2021

The Texas Constitution creates two top appellate courts: one for civil cases and one for criminal cases. This statement is True.

Learn more about Constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The phase of the trial during which legal counsel summarizes the evidence and arguments made during the trial and explains what inferences should be drawn from the evidence presented is called the "closing arguments" phase.

Closing arguments occur after both sides have presented their evidence and have completed the examination and cross-examination of witnesses. During this phase, each side's legal counsel has an opportunity to address the judge or jury and to summarize the evidence and arguments made during the trial in an attempt to persuade them to reach a particular verdict.

In addition to summarizing the evidence and arguments, closing arguments may also include an analysis of the law and how it applies to the case, as well as any other factors or considerations that may be relevant to the judge or jury's decision. The purpose of closing arguments is to provide a final opportunity for each side to make their case and to convince the judge or jury to rule in their favor.

The phase of the trial during which legal counsel summarizes the evidence and arguments made during the trial and explains what inferences should be drawn from the evidence presented is the closing arguments.

During closing arguments, the lawyer will provide a summary of the evidence presented during the trial and explain how it applies to the relevant law.

They will then provide an argument for why their client's position should be accepted by the court. They may also use analogies and other forms of rhetoric to further explain their points.

To know more about legal counsel click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30061988#

#SPJ11

5 candies can Hannah get in exchange for 55 tickets. Typically, there are three balls in each pinball game, which correspond to your three turns.

An itinerary for a round-trip flight from and back to the place of origin constitutes a dummy air ticket. Unlike a paid return ticket, a dummy ticket is not valid. It isn't a confirmed ticket; rather, it's just a document with the travel itinerary information.

Given

Total Prize tickets = 140

Tickets spend on the bracelet = 85

Tickets for candies that cost 10 each

Required to calculate how much candies get =?

Candies = 140 - 85 =55

Candies = 55 / 10 = 5 full candies Hannah gets.

Thus, Hannah gets 5 candies in exchange for 55 tickets. This cost, which is frequently referred to as "Face Value," is fully retained by the event organizer. Standard tickets make up the vast majority of Ticketmaster's sales.

Learn more about Ticket here:

https://brainly.com/question/14001767

#SPJ2

This scenario is an example of "escalation of commitment" or "sunk cost fallacy." It is the situation where  where an individual or organization continues to invest resources.

The term "escalation of commitment" refers to a situation where an individual or organization continues to invest resources, such as time, money, and effort, into a failing project or course of action despite evidence indicating its lack of success. This commitment escalation often occurs due to the fear of losing previous investments or a belief that future outcomes will improve.

In the given scenario, Jake, the CEO of WinWest Inc., launches a new product that consistently fails in the market. However, he is unwilling to withdraw it because he believes that it will eventually become profitable in the long term. This demonstrates an escalation of commitment because Jake is persisting with the failing product despite negative feedback or evidence.

The underlying rationale behind this behavior can be attributed to the sunk cost fallacy. The sunk cost fallacy occurs when individuals or organizations consider past investments (sunk costs) in a project as a reason to continue investing, even when it no longer makes logical sense. They perceive the investment as irrecoverable and believe that by continuing to invest, they can somehow recoup or justify their previous losses.

In Jake's case, he may feel that withdrawing the product from the market would mean accepting the loss of resources, such as time, money, and effort already invested. By holding onto the belief that the product will eventually become profitable, he falls into the trap of the sunk cost fallacy, leading him to continue investing in a failing venture.

It's important to recognize the sunk cost fallacy and understand that future decisions should be based on the product's current performance, market feedback, and potential for success, rather than past investments that cannot be recovered. Evaluating the situation objectively and making informed decisions based on present circumstances can help avoid the escalation of commitment and mitigate the negative impact on the organization.

To know more about escalation of commitment, click here:https://brainly.com/question/30482641

#SPJ11

The Lisbon Treaty amendments state that the respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, and respect for human rights are some of the shared values upon which the European Union is founded.

which items farther to the right being the least powerful, more truly depicts the legal force behind?

The EU can take action against a state if it violates or threatens to violate these standards. Due to its legal identity, the European Union has its own legal system that is distinct from international law. Moreover, EU legislation affects its Member States laws directly or indirectly and is incorporated into each State's legal framework.

The European Union is a source of law in and of itself. Respect for human dignity, equality, freedom, and solidarity are some of these core principles. The stated objectives of the EU are to uphold the universally held values of liberty, democracy, and the rule of law as well as to defend human rights. Accountability, transparent governance, just laws, and readily available, impartial justice are the four guiding ideas that assist to further define the rule of law.

Learn more about Constitutional Law:

https://brainly.com/question/14398727

#SPJ1

The U.S. Supreme Court majority in the Kelo v. the City of New London case applied the doctrine of "public use" under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which allows for the use of the eminent domain for public purposes.

In the Kelo v. City of New London case, the U.S. Supreme Court majority upheld the use of eminent domain by the City of New London, Connecticut, to take private property for the purpose of economic development. The Court applied the "public use" doctrine under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which provides that private property shall not be taken for public use without compensation.

The Court held that the City's plan to transfer the taken property to private developers for the purpose of economic development constituted a valid public use, as it would benefit the community as a whole by creating jobs, increasing tax revenue, and revitalizing the local economy.

To learn more about economic development, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/19632298

#SPJ4

27

Explanation:

in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa

Answer:

This concept is used by European countries.

Explanation:

The concept of Victimhood adopted by the European countries especially United States of America to invade Afghanistan and control the Asian region. The 9/11 incident is caused by the America itself to get a sympathy vote and a reason just like the incident of pearl harbor to invade Afghanistan to control the region. The main aim of these European countries to control the spreading of communism and not to control the terrorist so this Victimhood helps many countries to get their goals.

The statement "A person who is in possession of a negotiable instrument that is drawn, issued, or indorsed to him or to his order, or to bearer, or in blank is called a(n) holder" is true as it is a true definition of holder.

A "holder" is a person who has a negotiable instrument in their possession that is drawn issued or inscribed to them their order to bearer or in blank. A holder is someone who has the legal right to exercise the privileges and rights attached to a negotiable instrument such as a promissory note a check or a bill of exchange.

The holder may be the initial payee, a subsequent transferee, or a third party who obtains the instrument by endorsement or negotiation. They have the authority to receive payment, transfer the instrument or enforce the terms of it as the holder.

Learn more about negotiable instrument at:

brainly.com/question/3522225

#SPJ4

The provision of a Creole interpreter by the court is an example of due process in the criminal justice system. Due process refers to the legal requirement that the government must respect all legal rights owed to a person.

It is a principle that aims to ensure that every individual receives a fair and just trial. In this case, providing Jean with a Creole interpreter to understand the criminal charges filed against him, his rights, and the opportunity for bail is an example of due process in the criminal justice system.

The criminal justice system is in charge of making sure that perpetrators are prosecuted and that victims receive justice. The system also makes sure that persons who are accused of criminal activity receive fair treatment and all of their legal rights.

For more such questions on criminal justice system

https://brainly.com/question/30465999

#SPJ11

Answer:

I wouldn't 'fix' the bail system. I would terminate it completely. For many obvious reasons. When someone is arrested they arn't arrested for just going about their day, buying smoothies and what not. They've done something. And they shouldn't be granted they're freedom just because someone has enough money to pay for it. I think its wrong.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

Explanation:

“With court fees, with probation and parole restrictions, with low-level warrants, we’re asking them to live in halfway houses and on house arrest, and we’re asking them to negotiate a police force that is entering poor communities of color, not for the purposes of promoting public safety, but to make arrest counts, to line city coffers.” This causes more and more kids to go to prison rather than college.

Answer:

D. Trial Courts

C. Federal Courts

Answer:

D Trail courts and federal courts

Answer:

low

Explanation:

The Americans with Disabilities Act and related federal and state laws prohibit illegal discrimination against people with disabilities.

         The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, also known as the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12101), is a civil rights law that prohibits disability discrimination. It provides Americans with disabilities with similar anti-discrimination protections as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [1], which made discrimination based on race, religion, gender, national origin, and other characteristics illegal, and later sexual orientation. Furthermore, unlike the Civil Rights Act, the ADA requires covered employers to make reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, as well as imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations. [2] The National Council on Disability recommended the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1986, and the first version of the bill was introduced in the House and Senate in 1987.

To learn more about Americans with Disabilities Act:

https://brainly.com/question/2561827

#SPJ4

A) People with disabilities cannot be subjected to unlawful discrimination, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act and associated federal and state legislation.

Disability discrimination is illegal under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, generally known as the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12101). It gives people with disabilities the same anti-discrimination protections as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on sexual orientation and later, race, religion, gender, and other factors.

The ADA also imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations, unlike the Civil Rights Act, and compels eligible companies to provide reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was initially proposed in the House and Senate in 1987 after being recommended for adoption by the National Council on Disability in 1986.

Learn more about the Americans with Disabilities Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/2561827

#SPJ4

Indecent and profane content is prohibited on broadcast TV and radio between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.

Obscene content doesn't have assurance by the Main Revision. For content to be controlled vulgar, it should meet a three-pronged test laid out by the High Court: It should engage a typical individual's lascivious interest; portray or depict sexual direct in a "evidently hostile" way; and, taken all in all, need serious scholarly, imaginative, political or logical worth.

Indecent content sexual or excretory organs or exercises in a manner that is evidently hostile however doesn't meet the three-prong test for vulgarity.

Profane content incorporates "horribly hostile" language that is viewed as a public disturbance.

Factors in deciding how FCC rules apply incorporate the particular idea of the substance, the hour of the day it was communicated and the setting in which the transmission occurred.

to know more about FCC rules click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11356675

#SPJ4

Indecent and profane content is prohibited on broadcast TV and radio between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.

Obscene content doesn't have assurance by the Main Revision. For content to be controlled vulgar, it should meet a three-pronged test laid out by the High Court: It should engage a typical individual's lascivious interest; portray or depict sexual direct in a "evidently hostile" way; and, taken all in all, need serious scholarly, imaginative, political or logical worth.

Indecent content sexual or excretory organs or exercises in a manner that is evidently hostile however doesn't meet the three-prong test for vulgarity.

Profane content incorporates "horribly hostile" language that is viewed as a public disturbance.

Factors in deciding how FCC rules apply incorporate the particular idea of the substance, the hour of the day it was communicated and the setting in which the transmission occurred.

to know more about FCC rules click here:

brainly.com/question/11356675

#SPJ4

There are different kinds of insurance coverage. The two to be discussed here is the Car insurance  and life insurance.

Note that all state has its minimum car insurance requirements and the amount varies. The items taken into consideration are  the amount of coverage one need so as to be legally insured.

Insurance coverage is simply known as the amount of risk or liability that is taken up for a person, firm etc. through the use of insurance services. The types of insurance coverage are auto insurance, life insurance, etc.

Learn more about Insurance coverage from

https://brainly.com/question/2501031

Answer:

After the Civil War, some white southerners used various methods to try to overcome Republican rule, including voter intimidation, violence, and fraud. These methods were part of a larger effort to suppress the political power of African Americans and maintain white supremacy in the South. Other methods included the use of paramilitary groups like the Ku Klux Klan, as well as legal challenges and court cases aimed at limiting the rights of African Americans and other minority groups.

Typically, tariffs are employed to defend home sectors facing hardship from unfair overseas competition and unfair business practices like dumping and foreign government subsidies. Ad valorem taxes and specific tariffs are the two fundamental forms of tariffs.

Governments impose taxes, known as tariffs or duties, on the value of imported goods, including their freight and insurance. Varying countries impose different tariffs on certain products.

These include retaliatory tariffs, compound tariffs, tariff-rate quotas, ad valorem tariffs, and particular tariffs. A particular tariff is a tax that is tacked directly onto a single imported good and is unrelated to the value of that import. Typically, a certain tariff is determined by the volume or number of imported items.

To know more about Tariff here

https://brainly.com/question/26923792

#SPJ4

Steven, a prosecutor, has decided to bring three other felony charges against Brian, in addition to the burglary he was originally arrested for. He is engaging in Horizontal overcharging.

A single defendant is unfairly the target of a "horizontal" overcharging of accusations. Every technical criminal transaction in which he took part may result in a separate accusation being brought against him, or the prosecution could break up a single criminal transaction into several component charges.

In legal parlance, "tacking on" extra charges that the prosecutor is aware he cannot support is known as overcharging. It is used to give the prosecutor more leverage while negotiating a plea deal. All of the charges in cases of horizontal overcharging may be true, yet the defendant cannot be found guilty and sentenced on all of the charges. In order to reduce the number and severity of charges, the defense attorney should begin objecting to the overcharging as soon as they can.

Learn more about Guilty here:

https://brainly.com/question/8193162

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is below.

Explanation:

1. Reduce Taxes: by reducing the rate of taxes, the economic burden on the people will be reduced, thereby changing people's negative notions about me.

2. Creates direct employment: creating direct government employment will be seen as a good effort by the people as President that have their interest at heart, and is ready to eliminate unemployment.

3. Hold open forums and discuss with the people periodically: this will be a good platform for people to ask me about what they need, and getting a direct and positive response from me will definitely change their negative mind about me.

4. Creates enabling environments for businesses to thrive: a good enabling environment for businesses will, in turn, improve the standard of living of the people, thereby people will generally be happy.

5. Elevate economy through inclusive governmental policy: by ensuring every representative of the socio-political group is part of my administration, this will influence people to have a positive mind towards me.