A dying declaration can be admissible under 804(b)(2) if it concerns the cause or circumstances of the declarant's impending death and was made under a belief of certain and impending death.
Rule 804(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows the admission of a statement made by a declarant, who is now unavailable, if the statement was made under a belief of certain and impending death and concerns the cause or circumstances of the declarant's impending death.
The rationale for admitting such statements is that a person in this situation is unlikely to lie and has no motive to do so.
However, the statement must be trustworthy and reliable, and the prosecution must prove the unavailability of the declarant, as well as the declarant's belief of impending death, before the statement can be admitted. The statement must also be relevant to the case, and its probative value must outweigh any prejudice to the defendant.
For more questions like Statements click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/13131936
#SPJ11
does the maryland court have personal jurisdiction over the florida defendant? did defendant banks act ethically in this case?
No,the maryland court doesn't have personal jurisdiction over the florida defendant.
Late court choices on site contacts with Maryland appear to show that having a site alone isn't sufficient. Music Producer Property, LLC v. Sarro, US Locale Court (MD) 2010.
Indeed, even without an actual area, or explicit work site in the Province of Maryland, your business might be dependent upon the purview of Maryland courts. Assuming your organization promotes that it carries on with work all through the US or distinguishes clients with areas in Maryland (regardless of whether you worked for the client as a subcontractor to a bigger organization), you might wind up dependent upon Maryland ward.
On the off chance that there is a sprinkle of connection with Maryland, your organization might wind up liable to its locale. "A court might practice individual ward concerning any reason for activity over an individual domiciled in, presented with process in, coordinated under the laws of, or who keeps up with his chief business environment in the State." Courts and Legal Procedures Article of the Maryland Explained Code, § 6-102(a).
To know more about maryland ,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/1089961
#SPJ4
Can somebody help me
2. Agency theory examines the relationship between the owners of
the firm and the managers of the firm. TRUE / FALSE
To the statement that "Agency theory examines the relationship between the owners of the firm and the managers of the firm. TRUE / FALSE" is TRUE.
What is Agency Theory?Agency theory is defined as a theory that examines the relationship between the principals (shareholders/owners) and their agents (management) who have been granted the authority to act on behalf of the principals. The theory is concerned with the ways in which these parties design compensation packages and contracts to ensure that the objectives of the principals and agents are aligned.The term "agency" refers to the connection that exists between two people when one person consents to act on behalf of another. In a corporation, the management of the firm is the agent, and the shareholders are the principal.In conclusion, the Agency theory examines the relationship between the owners of the firm and the managers of the firm. This is a true statement, as it is concerned with how principals and agents establish contracts and compensation packages to ensure their goals are aligned. this theory explains the relationship between management and shareholders, as well as how the management is given the authority to act on behalf of shareholders.
To Know More about management visit:
brainly.com/question/32216947
#SPJ11
give me one word that can describe a diplomat.
Answer:
fancy
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
Which of the following stages in the criminal trial process winds up the trial proceedings?
opening statement
cross-examination
closing argument
direct examination
Answer:
option c
Explanation:
closing argument
Which of the following best illustrates an application of Newton’s First Law (also called the Law of Inertia)? A A passenger not wearing a seatbelt is ejected from an automobile during a severe crash. B Dinner plates remain on a table when a slick tablecloth is pulled out from underneath them. C An ice hockey puck continues sliding across the relatively frictionless ice until it comes into contact with a wall or a player’s stick. D All of these are examples of Newton's First Law.
Answer:
D. All of the Above
Explanation: Newton’s first law is “An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force” So if a pencil is rolling on a table and you stop it with you hand instead of letting it roll of the table in this case, the pencil is the object in motion and you are the unbalanced force.
Newton's first law described the relationship between the motion of object and the respective forced that acting on it.
Newton’s First Law
Correct option is D.
Under Newton's first law if the body of person keep constant for long period of time, it will automatically remain at rest.A dinner plate remain on a table for a long period of time at the time of slick tablecloth is pulled, then the plate object in motion and we are in the Unbalanced force.Therefore, correct option is D.
Learn more about Newton's First Law, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11677209
rite
levelopment? W
What sorts of changes have
been observing in your society
comparison to the last three yea
Prepare a short note based on it.
art Making Activity
Answer:
More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs.
Explanation:
More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs are the changes have been observing in the society as comparison to the last three years. Technology such as transportation, devices, medical and other industrial instruments and media devices are more advanced as compared to previous years. Due to these devices, people depend more on technology which is a source of easiness as well as causes adverse effect on health of people.
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Which of the following is true about police use of force against citizens?
Most of the injuries citizens receive as a result of use of force are quite serious
Less than lethal weapons are used in most incidents
Most police-citizen encounters do not include force
The majority of use of force by police is improper
O At least half of all arrests involve use of force
Answer:
Most police-citizen encounters do not include force.
Force is only used in certain situations.
A dead body of an elderly gentleman was discovered in an abandoned building. Blowfly pupae were found on the body. A missing person’s report was filed for an elderly gentleman who had wandered away from home just two days before. The body found was similar in age, height, and weight to the missing person. Could this possibly be the same person as the person described in the missing person’s report? Explain your answer.
Answer:
It is possible although unlikely due to the fact that blowfly pupae were already found on the body. Pupae generally set in around 18-24 days after death. Possible if there were factors present that increased the rate of decomp drastically
According to the case, the evidence of pupa was he found in the 8 to 12 days. It was the search of the record on the police station of the missing person report.
What is report?The term report on the police station on the missing, abusing, and violent and the other cases was the report. It was the formal report on the address the case on the police station. It was at least 24 hours in the day to register the report.
According to the case, pupa was at least 8 to 12 days as the found on the missing person dead body search on location and the inquiry. It was the evidence on the police station as lat two days of the report on the missing person. But, based on arthropod evidence, the man in the derelict building could not be the same man who was described missing.
As a result, the conclusion of the case are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on report, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14969693
#SPJ3
A conditional can be true even if it’s consequent is false
True or False?
A conditional can be true even if it’s consequent is false
True or False?
✏️AnswerFalseIf you sue someone and lose, you can Multiple Choice O sue them again O file in the appelate court O do nothing more O sue in the Supreme Court
Answer:
File in the appellate court
Explanation:
If you lose in a circuit court, the next step is to take the case (or file) with an appellate court
a husband from state a filed a divorce action against his wife, a citizen of state b, in state a federal court. the husband asked the court to divide the marital estate valued at $2,755,000. the couple lived in state b at all times during the marriage. the wife had never been to state a before the lawsuit was filed. the wife answered the husband's complaint without asserting any affirmative defenses or filing any additional motions. two years into the lawsuit, after discovery had been completed and four days before trial, the wife filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the husband's claims.
If a husband from State A files a divorce action against his wife from State B, in State A federal court: C: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.
May the court grant the wife's motion to dismiss?In this scenario, the wife is arguing that the court in State A does not have the authority or jurisdiction to hear the divorce case and divide the marital estate.
The motion to dismiss is being filed after two years into the lawsuit and just before the trial, which may indicate that the wife is trying to challenge the jurisdiction of the court at a late stage in the proceedings.
The outcome of this motion will depend on the specific laws and regulations of State A and the facts of the case. If the court agrees with the wife, it may dismiss the case, meaning the husband will have to file the divorce action in a court in State B. If the court denies the motion, it will proceed with hearing the case and dividing the marital estate.
Therefore the correct option is C.
Learn more about legal case here:https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
A husband from State A files a divorce action against his wife from State B, in State A federal court. In the action, the husband asks the court to divide the marital estate valued at $2,755,000. The couple lived in State B at all times during the marriage. The wife had never been to State A before the lawsuit was filed. The wife answered the husband's complaint, asserting no affirmative defenses and filing no motions. Two years into the lawsuit - after discovery had been completed, and 4 days before trial - the wife filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacks subjectmatter jurisdiction over the husband's claims. May the court grant the wife's motion to dismiss?
A: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks personal jurisdiction.
B: No; the court may not grant the wife's motion, because she waived any affirmative defense by failing to raise it in her answer to her husband's complaint.
C: Yes; the court may grant the wife's motion, on the ground that the district court in State A lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.
D: No; the court may not grant the wife's motion, because her motion to dismiss was not timely.
finish the lyrics
Cause you make my ____ quake
A. earth
B. Earf
C. oats
D. heart
Answer:
A Earth?
Explanation:
'Cause you make my earth quake
Oh, you make my earth quake
Riding around, you tell me something, baby, and it's making my heart break
'Cause you make my earth quake
Oh, you make my earth quake (earth quake, yeah)
Riding around, your love is shakin' me up and it's making my heart break (you already know)
jose sued an auto manufacturer exclusively for strict product liability when a defect in his purchased automobile's electrical lines caused a fire, leading to a total loss of the vehicle. jose did not suffer any personal injuries as a result of the incident. the auto manufacturer defended the claim of strict product liability on the basis that there were no personal injuries and the defect in the product only resulted in economic loss to jose. how does jose's claim stand up to the manufacturer's defense? a.) jose is likely to lose, because economic loss relating only to the product itself, as opposed to personal injuries, is not typically recoverable under strict product liability. b.) jose is likely to win, because economic loss is recoverable under strict product liability if a product is defective. c.) jose is likely to lose, unless he can provide a reasonable alternative design to the product that would have prevented the fire. d.) jose is likely to win, because there is no indication that he was aware of the defect in the automobile's electrical lines and elected to drive it anyway.
Jose is likely to lose, because economic loss relating only to the product itself, as opposed to personal injuries, is not typically recoverable under strict product liability.
What is economic loss?Economic loss refers to a term used to describe situations in which an economic loss money. The term includes economical loss that are typically shown on balance sheets or other financial statements. Total economic impact consisting of direct economic loss and indirect economic loss. Direct economic loss: The monetary value of total or partial destruction of property existing in the affected area. Direct economic loss is roughly equivalent to physical liability. Economic liability is generally defined as the difference in monetary value of an asset or cash flow stream at a particular point in time compared to the value of the same asset in the absence of the accused party's act or negligence causing the decrease in value.To learn more about economic loss from the given link :
https://brainly.com/question/28462441
#SPJ4
How is the method of choosing senators today different from the method described in the excerpt?
The framers believed that in electing senators, state legislatures would cement their tie with the national
government, which would increase the chances for ratifying the Constitution. They also expected that senators
elected by state legislatures would be able to concentrate on the business at hand without pressure from the
populace.
answer choices
A
Senators are directly elected by the citizens.
B
Senators must campaign for endorsement from state representatives.
C
Senators are appointed by the governor of the state.
D
Senators must be approved through the electoral college system.
Answer: Senators are appointed by the governor of the state.
Explanation: I think the answer is correct.
Hope that Helps!
Which amendment set the tone for the Bill of Rights, and what is the amendment's
purpose?
Answer:
The First Amendment sets the tone for the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment begins with the statement "Congress shall pass no law...The purpose is so" The first eclairs the government cannot take away our rights
Elaborate the functions of the three-tiered federal court system.
Answer:
The U.S. has a three-tiered structure of courts. The first one or the first level is trial courts. There is the Supreme Court on the second level, and the third level is the federal court. Trial courts or the federal courts look into the state matters dealing with the general public, the Supreme Court, on the other hand, is the highest court of the country, and the federal court is the court to hear the matters of the constitution.
Explanation:
District Courts and Circuit Courts
District courts are the primary or level 1 of the federal court system; the purpose of the district court is to settle the disputes of different states. Also, it is the first place of appeal. They function to deal with civil and criminal cases.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is the only institution where the cases can be challenged after being heard in the circuit courts and district courts. There is only one Supreme Court, and it is of the highest order. The Supreme Court can decide on all the matters concerning civil or state.
Federal Court
Federal court works for the matters of the state. Federal courts take into account only the matters concerning the legislature and high officials. They help the state to deal with the matters of the legislation separately.
-Hope this helps <3
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Which of the following is not a consideration when judging whether a method of criminal punishment of prison discipline is cruel and unusual?O Deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, education, and treatment of the offenders rather than on rehabilitationO Mandatory Minimum SentencesO General, specific, transferred, constructiveO Prevailing social values, Penological Purpose, Human Dignity
Which of the following constitutional clauses was most relevant in the Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade (1973) ? A Commerce clause. B Free exercise clause
c. Due Process Clause
The due process of law constitutional clauses was most relevant in the Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade (1973).
The correct option is c.
In the case of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (7-2) on January 22, 1973, that overly strict state restrictions on abortion are unconstitutional. The Court found that a set of Texas laws that criminalized abortion in most cases violated a woman's constitutional right to privacy, which it found to be implicit in the liberty guarantee of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law").
The majority opinion was written by Justice Harry A. Blackmun. The Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade in 2022. The correct option is c. due process of law.
Learn more about due process of law at:
brainly.com/question/11591373
#SPJ4
What are the components of the National Incident Management System?
NIMS Components of the National Incident Management System .The concepts of accountability, such as check-in/check-out, incident action planning, unity of command, individual accountability .
NIMS provides a set of standardized organizational structures (ICS, Interagency Coordination System, Public Information System, etc.) as well as processes, procedures to improve interoperability between different jurisdictions and disciplines. , and provide system requirements.
The core of NIMS' systematic method to responding to incidents is made up of six linked components. The order is as follows: 1) Command and Management; 2) Readiness; 3) Resource Management; 4) Communications and Information Management; 5) Supporting Technologies; and 6) Ongoing Management and Maintenance.
To know more about NIMS visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29811511
#SPJ4
describe the effects of the 13th 14th and 15th amendments, including the purpose and unintended consequences or challenges with enforcement of those amendments
Answer: The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, known collectively as the Civil War Amendments, were designed to ensure equality for recently emancipated slaves.
An intentional or unintentional concealment entitles the affected party to which of the following?
A Rescission of a contract.
B Estoppel.
C Waiver of concealed conditions.
D Subrogation of a contract.
An intentional or unintentional concealment entitles the affected party to "B. Estoppel.
Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents a person from asserting something contrary to what is implied by a previous action or statement of that person, or by a previous related action or statement of another person. Estoppel is frequently used in litigation and can be utilized as a defense or an affirmative claim.
When there is concealment, it's the result of an action or statement of one party, and the affected party relies on that statement or action, believing that it is true. Then, the affected party cannot assert something that contradicts what was said or done earlier. That would be unconscionable. Therefore, estoppel is the best answer. It's worth noting that estoppel is used as a defense in cases like contract law, and its applicability.Correct option is (b).
To know more about Estoppel, visit:-
brainly.com/question/31870117
#SPJ11
Tandem mass spectrometry combines the use of a gas spectrometer and a _____.light spectrometry
light spectrometry
mass spectrometry
component spectrometry
magnetic spectrometry
Tandem mass spectrometry is the use of a gas spectrometer in conjunction with a d) mass spectrometry.
Tandem mass spectrometry, commonly known as MS/MS or MS2, is an instrumental analysis technique in which two or more mass analyzers are linked together utilizing an additional reaction step to boost their ability to examine chemical samples. The examination of biomolecules such as proteins and peptides is a common use of tandem MS.
A given sample's molecules are ionized, and the first spectrometer (named MS1) separates these ions based on their mass-to-charge ratio (commonly expressed as m/z or m/Q).
Ions with a specific m/z ratio are chosen from MS1 and subsequently broken into smaller fragment ions, for example, through collision-induced dissociation, ion-molecule interaction, or photodissociation.
To know more about tandem mass spectrometry:
https://brainly.com/question/11311173
#SPJ1
Correct question:
Tandem mass spectrometry combines the use of a gas spectrometer and a _____.
a) component spectrometry
b) magnetic spectrometry
c) light spectrometry
d) mass spectrometry
PLEASE HELP ANSWER!!! AND DONT LINK WITH A FILE
TABLE 3 Record your answers
Long Bone
Bone Length
Height if Female
Height if Male
Humerus
30. 0 cm
158. 77
164. 8
Tibia
43. 8 cm
188. 55
187. 926
Ulna
23. 7 cm
158. 959
164. 662
Femur 1
58. 4 cm
198. 378
201. 018
Femur 2
52. 8 cm
184. 546
188. 026
Based on your height calculations, could some of these bones have belonged to the same person? Which ones? Keep in mind that the measurements are approximate.
Of the eight bones found, which do you think probably belonged to a man? Which likely belonged to a woman? Which aren’t you sure about? Can you tell anything about the victims’ age? Explain your answers. (three to five sentences).
How many individuals (male and/or female) do you think were present? Do the scatter patterns support your theory? (one to two sentences)
Do the bones show animal activity? How can you tell? (one to two sentences)
Do the bones show evidence of time, cause, or manner of death? Explain. (three to five sentences)
The local police have provided you with some missing persons reports. Look at the information for each missing person and compare it to your findings. Could the bones belong to any of these missing persons? If so, which ones, and why? Keep in mind that 1 inch = 2. 54 cm. (2-3 sentences)
Answer: bone lenght height if female humerus
Explanation: i pick tht because femals has short bones.
In 2020, Blake incurs $270,000 of mining exploration expenditures and deducts the entire amount for regular income tax purposes. Which of the following statements is correct?
a. For AMT purposes, Blake will have a positive adjustment of $243,000 in 2020.
b. Blake will have a negative AMT adjustment of $27,000 in 2024.
c. Over a 10-year period, positive and negative adjustments for mining exploration expenditures will net to zero.
d. "For AMT purposes, Blake will have a positive adjustment of $243,000 in 2020", "Blake will have a negative AMT adjustment of $27,000 in 2024" and "Over a 10-year period, positive and negative adjustments for mining exploration expenditures will net to zero" are correct.
Over a 10-year period, positive and negative adjustments for mining exploration expenditures will net to zero.
The correct statement is that over a 10-year period, positive and negative adjustments for mining exploration expenditures will net to zero. This means that the positive adjustments made in some years will be offset by negative adjustments in other years, resulting in a net zero impact on the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).
When a taxpayer incurs mining exploration expenditures, the regular income tax rules allow for the deduction of the entire amount in the year it is incurred. However, for AMT purposes, there are specific rules that govern the treatment of such expenses.
In the given scenario, Blake incurs $270,000 of mining exploration expenditures in 2020 and deducts the entire amount for regular income tax purposes. For AMT purposes, there will be a positive adjustment of 75% of the deduction, which amounts to $202,500 (75% of $270,000).
Based on the given options, statement (c) is correct because over a 10-year period, positive adjustments of $202,500 in some years will be offset by negative adjustments in other years, resulting in a net zero impact on the AMT.
The correct statement is that over a 10-year period, positive and negative adjustments for mining exploration expenditures will net to zero for AMT purposes. This means that the positive adjustments made in some years will be offset by negative adjustments in other years, ensuring that there is no long-term AMT impact from mining exploration expenditures.
To know more about expenditures ,visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29794698
#SPJ11
Laws of conservation of mass
Answer:
mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations.
Explanation:
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer:According to "https://courses.lumenlearning.com/" "The law of conservation of mass states that mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations"
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
A certiorari pool describes the
a.method used to appoint the chief justice.
b.nickname for the water fountain in the courtyard of the Supreme Court building.
c.computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court selects its cases each year.
d.practice by which Supreme Court law clerks work together to evaluate each petition.
Certiorari pool refers to the computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court of the United States selects the cases it will hear each year. Therefore the correct option is option C.
The certiorari pool is made up of legal clerks from each of the justices who screen the thousands of petitions filed each term and recommend which matters should be heard by the Court. The use of the certiorari pool has been criticised for lowering the number of cases heard by the Court and limiting the variety of problems presented for consideration.
The certiorari pool is a procedure utilised by the United States Supreme Court to help manage the huge number of certiorari petitions (requests for the Court to review a lower court decision) that are filed each year.
For such more question on Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
What is the best way to achieve good governance? Elaborate your answer.
Governance is the process by which corporations establish their rules and policies and implement and monitor them. Good governance has a variety of important characteristics, and it can mean different things to different people.
ParticipationConsensus orientedAccountabilityTransparencyResponsiveEffective and efficientEquitable and inclusiveFollows the rule of lawStrategic vision