When a citizen "is aware of and consciously disregardsa substantial and unjustifiable risk (that results in harms to other) he is said to act with what level of culpability?

Answer:

That is the definition.

Hope it helped.

It is important for attorneys to stay informed about the relevant laws in each jurisdiction where they practice to ensure they can provide competent representation to their clients. d. Yes, because he should have known that the plaintiff's case was not warranted by existing law.

The attorney in this scenario may be subject to sanctions. Despite being aware that the statute of limitations for the plaintiff's cause of action was three months, the attorney mistakenly believed the case was well within the statute of limitations based on his experience in other states.

However, the attorney had a professional responsibility to be knowledgeable about the applicable law in the jurisdiction where the case was filed. Failing to recognize that the statute of limitations had expired and filing a complaint after the deadline demonstrates a lack of due diligence on the attorney's part.

Sanctions in such cases aim to hold attorneys accountable for their professional conduct and maintain the integrity of the legal system. While the attorney may argue that he could have challenged the statute of limitations, his failure to file within the appropriate timeframe could still be deemed a violation of professional standards.

Learn more about: attorneys

brainly.com/question/17215189

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Explanation:

because the gang still are going to need to get money

True. A court can exercise jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries. This concept is known as "in rem jurisdiction," which allows a court to make decisions regarding property within its territorial limits, even if the property owner is not physically present in the jurisdiction.

Yes, a court can exercise jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries. This is known as in rem jurisdiction, where the court has authority over the property itself rather than the people involved in the case. In some cases, a court may also have in personam jurisdiction, which means authority over the individuals involved in the case. However, in rem jurisdiction is particularly relevant in cases involving property disputes or when a person is seeking to claim ownership of a piece of property.

Learn more about rem jurisdiction: https://brainly.com/question/30490907

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects

Explanation:

Trust me

The professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.

A professional lawyer or a legal luminary is a professional or expert who is:

A lawyer can be addressed as:

Thus, the professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.

Learn more about the legal profession at https://brainly.com/question/16040577

#SPJ1

Answer:

These professionals use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law:

.

Explanation:

Edge 2022 Unit Test

Answer:

mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations.

Explanation:

*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆

Answer:According to "https://courses.lumenlearning.com/" "The law of conservation of mass states that mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations"

Explanation:

I hope this helped!

<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>

- Zack Slocum

*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆

Answer: lol im taking ur points scammer

Explanation:

The two federal agencies charged with enforcing consumer laws are the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission. (True).

Step 3: True. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are indeed the two federal agencies charged with enforcing consumer laws. The FTC is responsible for protecting consumers against unfair and deceptive business practices, promoting competition, and ensuring that markets operate efficiently. They enforce a wide range of consumer protection laws and regulations, including those related to advertising, privacy, and fraud. On the other hand, the FCC focuses specifically on telecommunications and media industries, regulating areas such as telemarketing, robocalls, and internet service providers. Both agencies play crucial roles in safeguarding consumer rights and promoting fair practices in the marketplace.

Consumer protection agencies: The FTC and the FCC are key federal agencies in the United States tasked with protecting consumers. They work to ensure fair and competitive markets, protect privacy rights, and enforce laws related to advertising, telecommunications, and media. Their efforts aim to create an environment where consumers can make informed choices, have access to reliable services, and are protected from deceptive or harmful practices. By enforcing consumer laws, these agencies play a vital role in maintaining trust, fairness, and accountability in the marketplace.

Learn more about Trade Commission

brainly.com/question/32240579

#SPJ11

Concerning making a plea bargain as opposed to going to trial:

In the law sphere, a plea bargaining refers to the practice of negotiating an agreement between the prosecution & defense party whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense or to more of the offenses charged in an exchange for more lenient sentencing, recommendations, specific sentence, dismissal of charges etc.

Most often, the supporters of a plea bargaining claim that it speeds court proceedings and guarantees a conviction whereas the opponents plea bargaining believe that it prevents justice from being served.

Also, a plea bargains are not always easy to recognize. The negotiations that result in a formal agreements are called the explicit plea bargains while the some are called implicit plea bargains because they involve no guarantee of leniency.

Read more about plea bargaining

brainly.com/question/19557127

#SPJ1

Answer:

Civic Responsibilities

Explanation:

A duty (also called an obligation) is something that a citizen is required to do, by law. Examples of duties/obligations are: obeying laws, paying taxes, defending the nation and serving on juries. Rule of Law: Everyone is under the law. To obey the law, you must know the law.

Answer:

Civic Responsibility

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Films that tell stories present a narrative that can be fictional or not, but whose central purpose is to engage and entertain the viewer, as in the film "Karma: What goes around, comes around.

What is the plot of the film?

This Korean film specifically was released in 2020, being the horror genre and tells the story of a teacher who finds her deceased father's diary, in the house where she lived in her childhood, and from there discovers secrets and mysteries involving such deaths. .

Therefore, cinematographic works aim to lead to emotion, reflection, personal expression, engagement and entertainment, being the analysis of what a good film is to be personal and based on the perspective of the spectator.

Answer:

2

Explanation:

President Rutherford B. Hayes signed a bill allowing female attorneys to argue cases before the supreme court

President Rutherford B. Hayes was unable to establish a Civil Service Commission due to opposition from several members of his own party. In February 1879, he approved a law permitting female attorneys to present arguments before the US Supreme Court. Belva Lockwood appeared in Kaiser v. Stickney, 102 U.S. 176 in November 1880 to become the first woman to argue before the Supreme Court (1880). Although Sandra Day O'Connor will always be remembered as the country's first female Supreme Court justice, her influence extends well beyond that. O'Connor was born on March 26, 1930, in El Paso, Texas. She was raised on the Lazy B, an Arizona ranch owned by her family.

Know more about President Rutherford B. Hayes at: https://brainly.com/question/28243297

#SPJ4

The issue at the organizational and unit levels that nurse-leaders are being directed to address is High turnover rates by staff nurses. The correct option is D.

The high staff nurse turnover rates, which can have a significant impact on patient care quality, organizational costs, and workforce stability, are a challenge for nurse leaders to address. They must come up with plans to increase nurse job satisfaction deal with issues that lead to burnout, offer assistance and resources for career advancement and cultivate an environment that encourages retention.

Nurse leaders can contribute to the stability and efficiency of the nursing workforce, improving patient outcomes and fostering organizational success by focusing on lowering turnover rates.

Learn more about workforce stability at:

brainly.com/question/32314029

#SPJ4

Government and elected officials frequently seek public input to better understand what different groups value. The correct answer is d.

The people give the government this power in a democracy. They accomplish this through elections in which they vote for and elect specific individuals. These individuals, once elected, form the government. In a democracy, the government must explain and defend its actions to the people.

In a representative democracy, citizens elect or select elected officials who represent them in the legislative process. These elected officials, known as electors, propose and approve laws based on the interests of the public they represent.

Learn more about government, here:

https://brainly.com/question/4160287

#SPJ1

Even After Marriage Contract will be valid and that contract for diving assets is known as prenuptial agreement

A prenuptial agreement catalogues each person's property, assets and debts, and specifies each person's rights to that property if the marriage dissolves or if someone dies. While prenups are best known for dividing assets at divorce, they can also be used as a type of will.

A prenuptial agreement isn't just for wealthy people, though it's often used to protect a person’s wealth from a partner if there is a divorce. Those who are just starting their careers might also execute a prenup; it can help clarify financial and property issues, including debt repayment, should the union end. That can help make a divorce process less expensive and less painful for both parties.

What is a prenup?

A prenup contract may include:

To learn more about prenup visit here ; https://brainly.com/question/26030510?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

Answer:

i think its c

Explanation:

An example of "wrongful dismissal" at Gidgits Galore is when an office manager directs an employee to perform a job that allegedly violates safety laws. Employees have right to say that they cannot wait, or not wearing safety equipment. You cannot refuse or be fired for refusing.

Please note that the term discriminatory treatment means willful discrimination in the workplace.

An example of a "retaliatory dismissal" at Gidgits Galore involved an employee reporting to a company director that he facilitated workplace bribery, the employer learning about the bribery sandals, confronting the director, and the director firing him.

An example of “"disparate impact” at Gidgits Galore is ordering all employees to participate in a specific task and using the results of that task to disqualify some employees from a particular minority. It is to lay off in equilibrium.

An example of "bona fide occupational quality" at Gidgits Galore is when directors, supervisors and other employees of a company are required to join a union within the company in order to become members of that union. Examples are the National Institutes of Management, Accounting and Accounting. Allows you to meet professional obligations or requirements.

To learn more about disparate treatment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29892009

#SPJ4

Answer: "Poor writing affects the prosecution of cases and reflects poorly on both the individual officer and on the department".

Explanation:

Answer:

Its important to know how to write as those because gramar is everything and these job placement are very straightforward and strategic.

Explanation:

Up

One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.

Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.

Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.

The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.

Learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/26318342

#SPJ9

Discretionary decision making occurs in the criminal courts because the criminal justice system is complex and there are often multiple options for how to proceed in a case.

Prosecutors, in particular, have a great deal of discretion in deciding how to handle a case. This allows them to take into account factors such as the severity of the crime, the strength of the evidence, and the resources available.

Making discretionary decisions means making decisions based on logic and judgment rather than pre-determined criteria.

It is common for the source of authority to provide criteria in relation to the decision when the authority for making a decision comes from legislation or an internal procedure.

The words "shall" or "must" usually imply that the decision maker must make a specific decision if certain criteria are met, whereas the words "may" or "should" give the decision maker more leeway in weighing various factors.

Read more about discretionary decision making

brainly.com/question/29509213

#SPJ1

Answer:

Democratization, or democratisation, is the transition to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction.

Two kinds of statutes under workers' compensation are Compulsory Coverage Statutes and Benefit Statutes. Workers' compensation is insurance that provides wage replacement and medical benefits to injured employees in exchange for a mandatory waiver of the employee's right to sue their employer for negligence.

Compulsory Coverage Statutes require employers to provide workers' compensation coverage. The rules and regulations for compulsory coverage vary by state, but they generally mandate that employers either purchase workers' compensation insurance or self-insure to cover potential claims. Compulsory coverage statutes ensure that employees receive adequate protection and benefits in the event of work-related injuries or illnesses.

Benefit Statutes outline the benefits available to employees suffering work-related injuries or illnesses. Benefit statutes determine the types of benefits employees are eligible for, such as medical care, temporary and permanent disability benefits, vocational rehabilitation, and death benefits for dependents in case of a work-related fatality. These statutes also establish the duration and amount of benefits employees can receive, ensuring fair compensation for injured workers.

In summary, compulsory coverage statutes require employers to provide workers' compensation, while benefit statutes define the specific benefits and compensation available to injured employees.

To learn more about workers' compensation, visit: https://brainly.com/question/30193608

#SPJ11

Yes, Jeffrey is entitled to receive an accounting of the principal and income of the trust. As the trustee of the trust, Jeffrey has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiary, which includes providing an accounting of the trust assets.

The Uniform Trust Code (UTC) sets forth the requirements for a trustee to provide an accounting to a beneficiary. Under the UTC, a trustee must provide an accounting to a beneficiary at least once every three years, and more often if requested by the beneficiary. The accounting must include a list of all trust assets, as well as all income and expenses that have been paid from the trust.

In this case, Jeffrey requested an accounting from his father in 2007 and did not receive one by 2008. He is therefore entitled to file suit for an accounting. If the court finds that Jeffrey is entitled to an accounting, it could order the trustee to provide an accounting within a certain timeframe.

The court could also order the trustee to pay damages to Jeffrey for any losses that he has incurred as a result of the trustee's failure to provide an accounting.

Here are some of the things that a court could do in order to obtain the accounting:

For such more question on trust:

https://brainly.com/question/31851153

#SPJ8