Empire Gas Corp. v. American Bakeries Co. is a legal case that involved a dispute between Empire Gas Corp. and American Bakeries Co. over a contract for the supply of gas. The case was heard in the American court system and ultimately decided in favor of Empire Gas Corp.
The case is significant because it established legal precedent around the enforceability of contracts and the obligations of parties in business transactions, particularly when it comes to the supply and delivery of gas. The case is also notable for its impact on the gas industry in America, as it helped to establish clearer guidelines for how gas companies and their customers should conduct business with one another.
Empire Gas Corp. v. American Bakeries Co. refers to a legal case between two companies, Empire Gas Corporation and American Bakeries Company. In this context, "Empire" refers to Empire Gas Corporation, a company involved in the gas industry; "Gas" denotes the primary product or service provided by Empire Gas Corporation; and "American" represents American Bakeries Company, another business entity involved in the case.
The case likely revolves around a dispute or legal issue between these two companies, potentially involving gas supply or services provided by Empire Gas Corporation to American Bakeries Company. To fully understand the specific details and outcome of this case, it would be necessary to research and review the case documents and rulings.
learn more about american bakeries here
https://brainly.com/question/13500582
#SPJ11
Producers and consumers who participate in an economy are referred to by what term?
Answer Key
All answers will be graded following this answer key:
3 marks for the answer structure (Introduction, Body, Conclusion)
3 marks for presenting the legal concept (in this case the concept of offer, acceptance, and consideration)
4 marks for justifying or defending the decision
Tahir filed a civil case in court of first instance at RAK. His dispute with Khalid is worth AED 700,000. You are a judge to the case. Give your judgment and explain the decision.
It would be desirable to get the advice of a qualified legal expert or judge who is knowledgeable with the rules and regulations relevant to the particular jurisdiction in issue for a matter involving a disagreement between Tahir and Khalid over AED 700,000 in the court of first instance at RAK. To reach a well-informed decision, they would be able to evaluate the relevant facts, arguments, evidence, and legislation. A fair and unbiased assessment of the relevant facts and legal principles is crucial since legal issues include many factors.
The legal word for the power given to a legal organization to carry out justice is jurisdiction . In federations like the United States, there are local, state, and federal levels of jurisdiction.
In order to allocate resources to best meet the requirements of society, the executive and legislative branches of government legislation have the authority to use international law, conflict of laws, constitutional law, and other legal frameworks.
Learn more about jurisdiction , from :
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ1
If you live in NJ and Pennsylvania does common in law marriage apply in that situation
Answer:
New Jersey does not recognize common law marriages. In Pennsylvania, a couple may claim to be common law married if there is clear and convincing evidence that the couple exchanged words, in the present tense, for the specific purpose of establishing the legal relationship of husband and wife.
Explanation:
which of the following types of risk exist when a particular threat affects a large number of minor vulnerabilities and the combined affect has a significant impact?
Aggregate, Consolidate, Merged and Summed are the types of risk which exist when a particular threat affects a large number of minor vulnerabilities and the combined affect has a significant impact
Cybersecurity risks are related to the loss of information, data, or information (or control) systems' confidentiality, integrity, or availability and indicate the potential for negative effects on an organization's operations and assets, as well as on people, other organisations, and the country.
There are essentially two types of risk systematic and unsystematic. Systematic risk is the market uncertainty of an investment, which means it represents outside factors that have an impact on all (or many) businesses in a given sector or group. The asset-specific uncertainties that can impact an investment's performance are referred to as unsystematic risk.
To learn more about types of risk visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/5307837
#SPJ4
According to Florida law if you knowingly fail to report a case of child abuse or neglect
Answer:
Third Degree Felony and punishable by up to five years in prison, five years of probation, and a $5,000 fine.
Explanation:
According to Florida law if you knowingly fail to report a case of child abuse or neglect of a child in Florida is considered a felony.
If the abuse or neglect does not cause any bodily damage or motive any disfigurement or incapacity, it is a third-degree felony and the consequences encompass as much as five years of probation or five years in prison, and a fine of up to $5,000.
What is the definition of a felony?
In US law, a felony is typically defined as a crime punishable by means of a term of imprisonment of no longer much less than one year or by the death penalty. Misdemeanors, in comparison, are frequently described as offenses punishable most effective through fines or via quick phrases of imprisonment in local jails.
Conclusion: The most serious crimes are labeled as felonies. A felony consists of crimes like homicide, terrorism, cocaine trafficking, and many others.
learn more about homicide here https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ2
pollution affect our lives ?A . effect b.affects c, will affect D. affected
Answer:
the answer is a effect
Explanation:
pollution is very bad for everything
Drag each phrase to the correct location on the diagram.
Compare the different aspects of the Supreme Court by placing the tiles in the correct location.
1. Established in the Constitution
2. Lifetime appointment
3. Highest ranking officer
4. Number is determined by Congress
5. Can be removed through impeachment
6. Highest level of federal judiciary
NOTE: second image with answers shows where i can drag them (can only be one in bubbles, then others in overlapping parts)
Here is the correct placement of the phrases on the diagram (consist of Supreme Court, Associate Justice, and Chief Justice):
Supreme Court:
(1) Established in the Constitution
(4) Number is determined by Congress
(6) Highest level of federal judiciary
Associate Justice:
(2) Lifetime appointment
(5) Can be removed through impeachment
Chief Justice:
(3) Highest ranking officer
The Supreme Court is established in the Constitution and its number is determined by Congress. It represents the highest level of the federal judiciary. The Associate Justices hold lifetime appointments but can be removed through impeachment. The Chief Justice holds the highest ranking position within the Supreme Court.
These aspects highlight the unique characteristics of each role within the Supreme Court system, demonstrating the significance of the court as an institution and the specific responsibilities and authorities entrusted to each position.
Learn more about Chief Justice: https://brainly.com/question/22788746
#SPJ11
when it comes to drinking what is the buddy system?
Corporations may underreport cybercrimes because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence.
A. True
B. False
It is completely appropriate and correct to mention that the corporations may underreport cybercrime, because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.
What is the significance of cybercrime?A cybercrime can be referred to or considered as a form of criminal activity that takes place over the internet using a computer or a network of computers. Such crimes are handled by a completely different department of police authorities.
There have been instances where the plaintiffs have underreported their cybercrime, as they are concerned about the breach of their private data and confidential information.
Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of a cybercrime.
Learn more about cybercrime here:
https://brainly.com/question/28836591
#SPJ12
Which crime is classified as a misdemeanor?
O assault
O burglary
O murder
O speeding
The crime is classified as a misdemeanor is called speeding. Thus the correct option is D.
What is a misdemeanor?Though less harmful than murders, misdemeanors typically carry a greater degree of imprisonment. The penalty for a misdemeanor is a fine, imprisonment, or up to a year in a county or regional jail.
The threat or performance level of such an act, as well as the act of causing physical harm or unintentional contact with a person, may all fall under the legal definition of an assault regardless of the crime's level of seriousness.
Shoplifting, vandalism, drinking in public, and property crimes are examples of common crimes. Certain offenses may fall under the misdemeanor or felony categories, depending on the state.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about misdemeanors, here:
brainly.com/question/20348390
#SPJ7
A state law that violates the U.S. Constitution:
O Can be enforced by that state's government only.
O Can be enforced by the United States Supreme Court only.
o Can be enforced by the federal gchernment only.
Cannot be enforced.
Answer:
Not sure, but this helps! :)
Explanation:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
List 4 differences between the 3 type of documentation.
Difference
1. 2. 3. 4
Note taking, Photographing, Sketching
There are several differences between the three types of documentation: note-taking, photographing, and sketching. Some of these differences include:
Purpose: Note-taking is used to capture and summarize information, while photography is used to record visual information, and sketching is used to depict visual information in a more artistic and expressive way.Format: Notes are typically written down on paper or typed on a computer, while photographs are captured digitally or on film, and sketches are drawn by hand.Detail: Notes tend to be more concise and focused on key points, while photographs capture a wide range of details and provide a more complete representation of an object or scene, and sketches often emphasize certain details or aspects of an object or scene and may include artistic interpretation.Use: Notes are often used as a reference or study aid, while photographs are often used to document or record objects or scenes, and sketches may be used for artistic expression, design, or visualization.Overall, note-taking, photographing, and sketching are different tools that can be used for a variety of purposes, and the choice of which one to use will depend on the specific needs and goals of the documentation.
John Johnson was convicted 5 years ago of failure to pay child support, a misdemeanor in his home state. Mr. Johnson would now like to register as an IAR in a neighboring state where that crime is considered a felony. Under the Uniform Securities Act, the Administrator of the neighboring state will: A) disregard that conviction when determining Mr. Johnson's qualifications for registration. B) consider Mr. Johnson to be statutorily disqualified since in this state his crime is a felony. C) consider granting registration to Mr. Johnson, but only if he receives heightened supervision. D) determine Mr. Johnson's status on the basis of the extent to which his child support payments are being paid
The administrator can consider Mr. Johnson to be statutorily disqualified since failing to pay child support in this state is a felony.
Child support ensures that a child receives the same financial advantages as a child whose parents are still married. Child support is meant to assist in covering a child's care expenses. It can pay for things like uniforms, healthcare costs, extracurricular activities, and other things the kid needs frequently. Additionally, it can be used to cover a portion of the rent and utility bills for the house where the child lives. The court may impose a judgement for failing to pay child support. If a person fails to pay child support, the judge may find them in contempt of court, which could lead to an arrest and jail term. You may be able to petition the court for relief if you are unemployed or are having trouble coming up with the child support payments that were ordered by the court.
Learn more about payments here:
https://brainly.com/question/29633915
#SPJ4
career criminal prosecution program in san diego was characterized
The career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized by a high conviction rate and mandatory sentencing.
How the career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized The career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized by a high conviction rate and mandatory sentencing. This program aimed to put career criminals behind bars for as long as possible. San Diego was considered a pioneer in this approach to prosecution during the 1980s and 1990s, according to criminal justice researchers. The program was seen as a more aggressive approach to fighting crime, especially by repeat offenders. It resulted in fewer trials and more plea bargains due to the threat of mandatory sentencing. This approach aimed to deter criminal behavior by imposing lengthy prison terms.
Learn more about prosecution
https://brainly.com/question/29807782
#SPJ11
summarize articles 4-6 of the constitution
Answer:
4) The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
5) Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the process whereby the Constitution, the nation's frame of government, may be altered
6) Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution first says that any debts or engagements that the country was involved in before the Constitution was put into action are still valid.
Explanation:
Read above ^
1. Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a O courtroom drama, courtroom demeanor. courtroom practice. courtroom credibility.
Answer:
Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a courtroom demeanor.
Explanation:
Courtroom demeanor refers to one's professionalism within a court of law. Your courtroom demeanor is an extremely crucial factor to how exactly your witness testimony is perceived by the jury or bench.
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
The 4 principal methods for conducting a moving surveillance on foot are one-officer surveillance; two-officer surveillance; the ABC method; and the progressive or leapfrog method.
What are the principal methods in conducting foot surveillance? Which is the most effective?
The most principal methods that are used to carry out foot surveillance are:
stopping abruptly and looking to the rear,reverse suddenly and change your course,stopping abruptly after turning a corner,make sudden turnswatch reflections over glass.What is known as foot surveillance?This is the term that is used to refer to the monitoring while a person is on foot. Foot surveillance can be carried out with the use of a camera and it would involve two persons or more.
Hence we would say that The most principal methods that are used to carry out foot surveillance are:
stopping abruptly and looking to the rear,reverse suddenly and change your course,stopping abruptly after turning a corner,make sudden turnswatch reflections over glass.Read more on surveillance here:
https://brainly.com/question/11415145
#SPJ1
Question 3 of 10
Which option is an example of a low-risk investment?
A. Stocks
O B. Hedge funds
C. Savings accounts
O D. Mutual funds
Savings account is an example of a low-risk investment.
What is a savings account?A savings account is a bank account at a retail bank. Common features include a limited number of withdrawals, a lack of cheque and linked debit card facilities, limited transfer options, and the inability to be overdrawn.
A savings account is an interest-bearing deposit account held at a bank or other financial institution. Though these accounts typically pay a modest interest rate, their safety and reliability make them a great option for parking cash you want available for short-term needs.
The amount you can withdraw from a savings account is generally unlimited. The interest you earn on a savings account is considered taxable income.
What is a low-risk investment?Risk is something unwanted happening. In finance, it might be the moment of the price of an asset in the opposite direction to what the investor has bet.
Definition of risk is a question of defining the goal of the investment and then the types of risk it involves.
There are measurement methods for each type of risk. The most common way to define and quantify risk is to use it as a proxy for measuring risk. Variance is the most common way to describe what risk is. Combining all the risks gives us what the total risk of an investment is.
Hence, option C is the correct answer
To learn more about savings account here,
https://brainly.com/question/1446753
#SPJ2
Answer:For my question it was actually certificates of deposit
Explanation:
a contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of a‹ _____ or a _____.
Answer:
A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of law or a tribunal.:
How do values into all stages of the research process(meaning theory-building process and research I suppose)?
Is the information gathered from criminological research a factor in public crime-control policies?
class CRJU2060: Criminology (Online) 21789
Answer:
The building of theory occurs in two major stages – the descriptive stage and the
normative stage. Within each of these stages, theory builders proceed through three steps. The
the theory-building process iterates through these stages again and again.1
In the past,
management researchers have quite carelessly applied the term theory to research activities that
pertain to only one of these steps. Terms such “utility theory” in economics, and “contingency
theory” in organization design, for example, actually refer only to an individual stage in the
theory-building process in their respective fields. We propose that it is more useful to think of the
term “theory” as a body of understanding that researchers build cumulatively as they work
through each of the three steps in the descriptive and normative stages. In many ways, the term
“theory” might better be framed as a verb, as much as it is a noun – because the body of
understanding is continuously changing as scholars who follow this process work to improve it.
News coverage that is manipulated (managed) by a campaign manager or political consultant to gain media exposure for a political candidate.
Answer:
Managed news coverage refers to the practice of manipulating media coverage for the benefit of a political candidate. This can be done through a variety of tactics, such as planting stories in the media, organizing media events, and working with journalists to shape the way that a candidate or campaign is covered. Managed news coverage can be a powerful tool for political campaigns, as it allows them to control the narrative and present their candidate in a favorable light. However, it can also be controversial, as it can involve manipulating or misleading the public and may be seen as a form of propaganda. It is important for journalists and the public to be aware of the potential for managed news coverage and to be cautious when evaluating media coverage of political candidates.
Terrorism is among the main concerns of any modern public security organization. Research some recent foiled acts of domestic terrorism and discuss the critical-thinking skills that the public security personnel displayed as they countered the attempts. Discuss what public security personnel can do to address the problem of terrorism while keeping in mind the Bill of Rights. Write your response in two or three paragraphs.
PLEASE HELP IN A HURRY!!!! 50 POINTS FOR WHO EVER GETS IT RIGHT!!!
Tamsin is 16 years old and the daughter of Tommy and Teesha. Tamsin falls pregnant and wants to get married to Terrence who is 25 years old and the father of the child.
As a general rule, who must consent to the marriage?
Answer:
As a general rule, Tamsin's parents or legal guardians would need to consent to the marriage since she is under 18 years old and considered a minor. The laws regarding marriage and consent may vary depending on the jurisdiction, so it is important to check the specific laws in the relevant area. In some cases, there may be exceptions or special circumstances that allow minors to marry without parental consent, such as if they have a court order or if they are legally emancipated.
Explanation:
classify the definition or example with the appropriate gas law.
"The pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume at constant temperature." - Boyle's Law"
The total pressure exerted by a mixture of gases is equal to the sum of the pressures exerted by each individual gas." - Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures"
The volume of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature at constant pressure." - Charles's Law"
The rate of effusion of a gas is inversely proportional to the square root of its molar mass." - Graham's Law of Effusion"
The pressure of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas present at constant temperature and volume." - "Avogadro's Law"
Explanation:
This statement describes the relationship between pressure and volume, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Boyle's Law.
The statement refers to the total pressure of a mixture of gases and the individual pressures exerted by each gas. It aligns with Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures.
This statement discusses the relationship between volume and temperature, suggesting a direct proportionality. It relates to Charles's Law.
The statement pertains to the rate of effusion of a gas and its molar mass, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Graham's Law of Effusion.
This statement refers to the relationship between pressure and the number of moles of gas, indicating a direct proportionality. It aligns with Avogadro's Law.
To know more about Boyle's Law, click here https://brainly.com/question/30367133
#SPJ11
Joe wants to take a position contrary to the IRS position on his tax return. You are Joe's accountant. What should you do when preparing Joe's federal tax return under the following scenarios assuming that Joe is willing to take the position and understands the potential consequences:
- You have substantial authority for the position - take the position and do not need to disclose - You have realistic possibility - take the position, but disclose - You have reasonable basis - take the position, but disclose
If Joe, who wants to take a position contrary to the IRS position on his tax return, is your client, you are required to advise Joe on the best course of action to take when preparing his federal tax return under the following scenarios:
If you have substantial authority for the position - you can take the position and do not need to disclose, as you can rely on the law and regulations to support Joe's position, and you should have a high level of confidence in the position. Your client will not be subjected to a penalty in this case, provided he discloses his position in the return, attaches a statement detailing the legal and factual grounds for the position, and gives Joe's name and other information as specified in the regulations .
It indicates that you've examined the position's legal and factual basis and have concluded that there's more than a minimal probability that it'll be supported, but you don't have the same level of confidence that you would have with a substantial authority. Joe must disclose his position in this case, provide a declaration stating the legal and factual basis for his position, and give Joe's name and other relevant information as specified in the regulations.
Learn more about tax return here:https://brainly.com/question/19577427
#SPJ11
Consider the case of Everfresh Market Virginia (Pty) Ltd v Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd 2012 (1) SA 256 (CC). Did the decision in this case have a significant impact on the role of the principle of good faith in South African contract law? Explain your answer.
Yes, the decision in Everfresh Market Vir. ginia (Pty) Ltd v Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd 2012 (1) SA 256 (CC) had a significant impact on the role of the principle of good faith in South African contract law.
What is the explanation for the above response?Yes, the decision in Everfresh Market Virginia (Pty) Ltd v Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd 2012 (1) SA 256 (CC) had a significant impact on the role of the principle of good faith in South African contract law.
The case established that parties to a contract have a duty to perform their obligations in good faith, which includes an obligation to not act in a manner that undermines the other party's legitimate interests. This duty extends beyond the express terms of the contract and requires parties to act honestly, reasonably, and in a manner that promotes the values of the Constitution.
The case has since been cited and applied in subsequent cases, demonstrating its enduring impact on South African contract law.
Learn more about principle of good faith at:
https://brainly.com/question/30023667
#SPJ1
Vì sao nói tác phẩm báo chí là một chỉnh thể? Nhận thức tính chỉnh thể của tác phẩm báo chí có thể giúp ích gì cho nhà báo và công chúng trong quá trình sáng tạo và tiếp nhận báo chí?
Answer:
em cũng muốn hỏi
Explanation:
which kind of judicial decision-making acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent?
The correct answer is judicial activism that acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent.
According to the legal theory of "judicial activism," courts can and must consider societal effects in addition to the law that applies when making decisions. It is occasionally used in defiance of court restraint.
It refers to a judge deviating from precedent and relying more heavily on their own convictions while rendering decisions. Politicians disagree on both the overall concept of judicial activism and specific activist judgements.
Additionally, they contend that the judiciary invalidates the actions of both elected and unelected officials, including sometimes legislative acts that reflect the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time of passage rather than necessarily the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time the legislation is invalidated.
To find similar questions related with 'judicial activism'
visit- https://brainly.com/question/509532
#SPJ4
Nico and oscar form a contract under which oscar is to perform gardening services for nico for one year. For six months, oscar performs the services, and nico pays him. Nico’s mother, madison, becomes ill and is unable to care for her garden. The three agree that oscar will no longer care for nico’s garden but instead will care for madison’s garden for the remainder of the year. The new contract.
Oscar performs the services, and nico pays him,The three agree that oscar will no longer care for nico’s garden but instead will care for madison’s garden for the remainder of the year The new contract is a novation.
The mutual rights and obligations of the parties to a contract are established, clarified, and governed by law. A contract usually entails the transfer of products, services, cash, or a promise to transfer any of those things at a later time.
The three most typical forms of contracts are: contracts with set prices. Cost-plus contracts Time and material agreements. A more effective way to determine if specific numbers are polynomial roots is by the remainder theorem. When using other polynomial tests, such as the rational roots test, this theorem can improve efficiency. Not all division issues have a whole number solution. When you divide by the number of remainders, the closest multiple that is less than the dividend is returned, and the residual is then added.
Learn more about contract here :
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4