What would of happened if Antigone had not buried her brother? Write a paragraph explaining your answer.

The correct answer is (d) Ethos. The appeal that normally deals with an argument's author is referred to as Ethos. Ethos is an appeal to the credibility and trustworthiness of the speaker or writer.

It is based on the audience's perception of the speaker's character, expertise, and authority. Ethos can be established through evidence, credentials, and reputation. By establishing their credibility, speakers can gain the trust and confidence of their audience, making them more receptive to their arguments.

Ethos is often used in persuasive writing or speaking to make the audience more willing to accept the speaker's message.

To learn more about Ethos, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/29789532

#SPJ4

The jouney was burdensome and full of difficulties, testing the restrictions of perseverance and flexibility. Regardless of various deterrents, the unfaltering assurance and steadiness of the explorers moved them forward, eventually prompting win despite everything.

A troublesome jouney alludes to a difficult and requesting experience that includes beating snags, difficulties, or misfortunes. It tends to be a figurative or exacting excursion, including physical, close to home, or mental difficulties that require diligence, strength, and assurance to explore through and arrive at an ideal objective or objective.

Instances of troublesome jouney can incorporate self-awareness and self-disclosure, recuperation from disease or dependence, seeking after a difficult profession way, or setting out on a truly requesting endeavor.

Learn more about journey, from:

brainly.com/question/14486811

#SPJ1

In order to use the evidence effectively for our analysis we can rephrase the content to make it explicit.

As your thesis is something new that you creating and writing, there are fewer chances of an evidence to explicitly be present that matches your thesis exactly. However, there are more chances of you finding a piece of evidence that implicitly supports your thesis.

In such a case, you can rephrase that piece of evidence in such a manner that they go explicitly with your thesis. The better the rephrasing, the more explicit the evidence will look in your thesis.

Although a part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this question:

2) Suppose you are writing an analysis of a literary text. In the text you find a piece of evidence that could support your thesis. However, the evidence supports your thesis implicitly, not explicitly. What must you do in order to use the evidence effectively in your analysis?

Rephrase the implicit evidence so that it becomes explicit.

Search for a more explicit piece of evidence on the same point.

Make an inference to connect the evidence to your thesis.

Do research to find evidence outside your literary text.

To learn more about thesis, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2094985

#SPJ4

Answer:

can you evaluate? don't know where this sentence is coming from and what exactly the question is?

Answer:

C

Explanation:

They're is the abbreviation for "they are"

There - Over THERE, a place, over there

Their - Something you own. Theirs, yours, ours, mine

In Treasure Island, Hands asks about whether a man can come back to life because he is fearful of the consequences of his actions. Hands knows that he will soon die as a result of his betrayal of Captain Smollett and the other crew members, and he is seeking reassurance that he may be able to come back to life in some way.

As for Hands' reasons for living a sinful life, it is suggested throughout the novel that he has had a difficult and troubled past, leading him down a path of crime and dishonesty. His life has likely been filled with hardships and struggles, leading him to make poor choices and engage in immoral behavior. Ultimately, Hands' tragic fate serves as a warning against the dangers of a life of sin and wrongdoing.

To know more about Treasure Island click here:

https://brainly.com/question/4060217

#SPJ11

The reason why Hands ask whether a man can come back to life is this: He did not want to reap the repercussions for his wrong deeds. He also lived a sinful life because he believed that there were no rewards for being good.

In Treasure Island, Hands was a pirate who was happy about defrauding people. He lived a very treacherous and that made close companions like Jim be weary of him.

So, Hands asked about a second life because he did not want to be judged and since he believed that there were no rewards for good seeds, he continued being bad.

Learn more about Hands in Treasure Island here:

https://brainly.com/question/31888180

#SPJ4

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

I believe as so you know what your audience likes what photos or videos you put out also it can show much they like or agree with the post or video to express towards it.It has a impact to show how appreciated or loves the post of video is.

Hope this helped ;)

The central idea of the fragment is that the mistress is not as beautiful as nature.

To identify the central theme of the fragment we must carefully read and understand each of the sentences to adequately infer what is the idea that is related to all the sentences.

The central idea of this fragment is that the mistress does not have the beauty of nature because the author makes a comparison highlighting that the mistress does not resemble the colors of nature.

Note: This question is incomplete because there is some information missing. Here is the complete information:

My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun;

Coral is far more red than her lips' red;

If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun;

If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head from her.

Learn more about central idea in: https://brainly.com/question/8282081

#SPJ1

Answer: the answer is d, the narrator is comparing the mistress to nature in a negative way.

Explanation:

The second sentence of this paragraph should be written as "I often ask my dad, who is an excellent athlete, to play soccer with me."

This is because "who is an excellent athlete" is a nonessential clause that provides additional information about the dad, but is not necessary to the sentence's meaning. Therefore, it should be set off with commas to indicate that it is a parenthetical element. In the context of this paragraph, the author is describing how busy their life is but they still try to make time for their family. They mention several activities they enjoy doing with different members of their family, such as playing soccer with their dad, taking walks, baking desserts, and playing cards with their mom.

To learn more about family click here https://brainly.com/question/14920326

#SPJ11

- Ethical relativism is an instance of moral anti-realism.

- Metaethical relativism pertains to the nature of moral judgments, while normative relativism addresses the content of moral principles.

- According to Rezkalla, tolerance presents moral relativism in an appealing light but undermines its own argument by relying on an objective moral principle.

Ethical relativism is a metaethical position that claims moral judgments are not objectively true or false, but rather depend on individual or cultural perspectives. It argues that there are no universal moral truths that apply to all people at all times. This aligns with moral anti-realism, which denies the existence of objective moral values and holds that moral judgments are subjective and relative to individuals or cultures.

Ethical relativism rejects the idea of a universal moral standard and asserts that moral judgments are contingent upon individual beliefs or cultural norms. It suggests that what is considered morally right or wrong varies from person to person or society to society. This perspective implies that moral judgments are not grounded in any objective reality but are rather subjective and relative.

On the other hand, moral realism, which is the opposite of moral anti-realism, posits that moral truths exist independently of human opinions or cultural practices. Moral realists argue that there are objective moral principles that apply universally and are not contingent upon subjective perspectives.

Metaethical relativism deals with the nature of moral judgments and seeks to answer questions about the objectivity or subjectivity of moral claims. It argues that moral judgments are not universally true or false but are rather dependent on individual or cultural perspectives. On the other hand, normative relativism focuses on the content of moral principles and maintains that different cultures or individuals may have differing moral codes that are equally valid.

According to Rezkalla, tolerance is often presented as a value associated with moral relativism. Tolerance suggests an open-minded and accepting attitude toward diverse moral perspectives. It can be seen as a way to bridge the gap between different cultural or individual moral frameworks and foster peaceful coexistence. Tolerance, in this context, appeals to people because it promotes respect for others' beliefs and encourages dialogue and understanding.

However, moral relativism undermines its own argument when it presents tolerance as its value. Moral relativism asserts that there are no universally valid moral principles, and all moral judgments are subjective. Yet, when it claims tolerance as a value, it implies an objective moral principle that should be universally upheld. This contradiction weakens the argument for moral relativism since it relies on an objective standard, namely, the value of tolerance, while simultaneously rejecting the existence of objective moral truths.

Learn more about Metaethical relativism

brainly.com/question/9260521

#SPJ11

Answer:

Writing to a friend.

Answer: Because that cloth must be on trend

Explanation: Public image is important for most of the people, and you'll denote that when you know how to use things that are trending.

Answer:

The person who's purchasing would be the famous persons' fan.

Explanation:

Just like famous soccer players give away their shirts after matches. (For Example: Ronaldo, Messi, etc.) their fans are eager to take their worn clothing.

Maybe for the memory, maybe for motivation for them to start soccer, etc.

Gatsby's lavish parties are symbolic of the extravagance and opulence that he has become known for. They also reflect his inner desire to be accepted and admired by the upper class of society.

By throwing these parties, Gatsby is trying to show the world, and especially Daisy, that he has become successful and wealthy, and that he can provide for her. They reveal his longing for a lavish lifestyle, and his ambition to be accepted by the wealthy and powerful.

In addition, Gatsby's parties are a way for him to reach out to people, to demonstrate his generosity and hospitality, and to gain their favor. Furthermore, these parties show Gatsby's determination and ambition to attain his dream of being with Daisy. All in all, Gatsby's lavish parties symbolize his desire for acceptance, his ambition, and his longing for a lavish lifestyle.

know more about ambition here

https://brainly.com/question/30514395#

#SPJ11

Answer:

In conclusion, diversity and immigration are valuable to Americans in many ways. They bring new perspectives, ideas, and cultures that enrich our society and help us grow as a nation. They also contribute to our economy by creating new businesses, jobs, and innovations. Furthermore, diversity and immigration are essential to our national identity as a melting pot of cultures and a beacon of hope for people around the world. As we continue to embrace diversity and welcome immigrants, we can build a stronger, more inclusive, and more prosperous America for all.

Answer:

The bible encourges me to act my best and treat others with kindness. Also putting my trust in the lord and jesus  everyday, to do things in the way of his actions, to treat others the way we want to be treated. His bible, which is showing us the way to live, are everyday messages reminding us to be the best versions of ourselves.

~rere

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

yes

Answer:

Yes, Of Course

Explanation:

Thank You so much.

I'm so grateful

As per the given sentence in the question the word that BEST connects the two sentences would be "Furthermore".

Using "Furthermore" at the beginning of sentence 2 would signal to the reader that the second sentence is a continuation of the previous one, and that the subject of the sentence (he) is still being discussed.

This word creates a logical connection between the two seemingly unrelated ideas in the sentences, showing that the person being described had diverse interests and skills beyond just agriculture.

For such more question on article

https://brainly.com/question/24222248

#SPJ4

The metaphor ""beacon of freedom"" reflect the purpose of inspiring the audience to take action in the upcoming election was that Obamania has been sweeping the nation as the charismatic son of a black Nigerian father and a white Kansas mother appeals to Americans' desire for change and their dissatisfaction with the country's fantasy politics and spin-doctored military campaigns.

Obama first appeared to be a political scene breath of new air, one who would liven up the early primaries before fading from view. At various points in time, we have thought of ourselves as a chosen people, a city on a hill, a democratic powerhouse, and a beacon of freedom.

We display and convey the essence of that character to the outside world and to ourselves through our individual and group behaviours. This character has a history, and that past is strong enough to both help us understand the world and help the world understand us.

Learn more about ''beacon of freedom'':

https://brainly.com/question/16659786

#SPJ4

The complete question is ''How does Senator Obama's use of the metaphor "beacon of freedom" reflect the purpose

of inspiring the audience to take action in the upcoming election? Select all that apply.

The use of the metaphor "beacon of freedom" reinforces the idea that the

United States is regarded as the land of opportunity and hope for a better life.

The use of the metaphor "beacon of freedom" is an appeal to pathos that

invites the audience to show compassion to immigrants in the United States.

The use of the metaphor "beacon of freedom" is a logical appeal that urges the

audience to consider all factors before taking advantage of opportunities.

The use of the metaphor "beacon of freedom" suggests that the opportunities

that the United States offers should not be taken for granted.

The use of the metaphor "beacon of freedom" is an ethical appeal that

reminds the audience of the country's core values and that it needs to be

4 protected.

Answer: A

Explanation:

Sure. Here is a brief essay summarizing the philosophical ideal, or theme, embodied in the poem "Sonnet 73" by William Shakespeare:

The poem "Sonnet 73" by William Shakespeare is a meditation on the passage of time and the inevitability of death. The speaker compares himself to a tree in autumn, whose leaves are falling and whose branches are bare. He sees himself as a "ruined choir," where the "sweet birds" of youth have stopped singing. He knows that he is growing old, and he is aware of his own mortality.

However, the speaker does not despair. He knows that death is a natural part of life, and he accepts it. He says that he "still" loves, even though he knows that he will "leave" his love "ere long." He is grateful for the time that he has had with his love, and he knows that their love will be with him even after he is gone.

The poem "Sonnet 73" embodies the philosophical ideal of acceptance. The speaker accepts the passage of time and the inevitability of death. He does not fight against these things, but he embraces them. He knows that death is a part of life, and he is grateful for the time that he has had.

The poem also embodies the theme of love. The speaker loves his love, and he knows that their love will be with him even after he is gone. He is grateful for the time that he has had with his love, and he knows that their love will sustain him even after he is gone.

The poem "Sonnet 73" is a beautiful and moving meditation on the passage of time, the inevitability of death, and the power of love. It is a poem that will stay with you long after you have finished reading it.

Here are some specific examples from the poem that support the idea that the speaker is accepting of the passage of time and the inevitability of death:

"That time of year thou mayst in me behold / When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang / Upon those boughs which shake against the cold, / Bare ruined choirs, where late the sweet birds sang."

"In me thou see'st the twilight of such day / As after sunset fadeth in the west, / Which by and by black night doth take away, / Death's second self, that seals up all in rest."

"In me thou see'st the glowing of such fire / That on the ashes of his youth doth lie, / As the deathbed whereon it must expire, / Consumed with that which it was nourished by."

These lines show that the speaker is aware of the passage of time and the inevitability of death. He sees himself as a tree in autumn, whose leaves are falling and whose branches are bare. He knows that he is growing old, and he is aware of his own mortality.

However, the speaker does not despair. He knows that death is a natural part of life, and he accepts it. He says that he "still" loves, even though he knows that he will "leave" his love "ere long." He is grateful for the time that he has had with his love, and he knows that their love will be with him even after he is gone.

The poem "Sonnet 73" is a beautiful and moving meditation on the passage of time, the inevitability of death, and the power of love. It is a poem that will stay with you long after you have finished reading it.

Divesting from fossil fuels is a complex process that could lead to several difficulties for organizations. However, these risks may be outweighed by the benefits of transitioning to a more sustainable investment portfolio and reducing the impact of climate change.

When organizations divest from fossil fuels, they may face several difficulties that could impact their operations and financial performance.

Firstly, divesting from fossil fuels can be a complex process that requires significant planning and resources. This could include researching alternative investment opportunities, developing divestment strategies, and managing the transition to new investments.
Secondly, divesting from fossil fuels could lead to a loss of revenue and profitability, especially if the organization has significant investments in the fossil fuel industry.

This could impact shareholder returns and make it challenging to maintain financial stability in the short term.
Thirdly, divestment could also result in reputational risks, particularly if the organization is seen as not doing enough to address climate change.

This could impact the organization's relationship with stakeholders, including customers, employees, and investors.
Finally, divesting from fossil fuels could also result in regulatory risks, as governments and regulators may impose stricter regulations on the fossil fuel industry, which could impact the organization's financial performance.
In summary, divesting from fossil fuels is a complex process that could lead to several difficulties for organizations.

However, these risks may be outweighed by the benefits of transitioning to a more sustainable investment portfolio and reducing the impact of climate change.

For more such questions on fossil fuels

https://brainly.com/question/79954

#SPJ11

Answer:

Should be A

Explanation:

They are stating that no GOV has followed said action. They are not providing proper evidence or proof so it cannot be a statistic.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Need to get or have the logical reasoning for sth

Answer:

The tone of the author in, How Lift-Offs Lift Our Spirits is passionate.

Explanation:

‘How Lift-Offs Lift Our Spirits’ is an article written by Miranda Sharon where she discusses about the America’s space program and her thoughts regarding space exploration.

If we look at the excerpt provided, we will get to known that the author uses a passionate tone. Although the very first line of the article is saddening, but as the article moves forward we get to known the author’s passion for space program. She have said so many things which shows her passionate tone. For example, when author mentioned about the average American hearts, she was referring the importance of space in the hearts of people. The words ‘desires’, ‘excitement of new discoveries’, ‘inspiration for our souls’ indicates the author’s enthusiastic feelings towards space.

It is important to include a clear and concise summary of the main ideas and themes of the story in a summary of the story.

When summarizing the story, make sure to include key details such as the protagonist, the main conflict, and the resolution. Additionally, make sure to include any important symbols or motifs that are found in the story, as well as any key themes or messages that the author is trying to convey.

Franklin Checker is a tool developed by the Franklin Institute to help people understand the implications of their decisions and actions. It is designed to help people identify and evaluate possible consequences that they might not have considered. It was created by Benjamin Franklin, who believed that people should take the time to think through their actions before they take them.

Learn more about Franklin Checker:

https://brainly.com/question/14503458

#SPJ4

Answer:

They haven't built a house.

Answer:

the other person was right im just ansewering so u can mark them brainliest !! <3

Explanation:

Roger won first place. This made him very happy because he worked really hard on his project.

; )

Answer:

This leaves the task to Max alone. Therefore, Kevin's gift to Max is a blank book in which he can write down all of the adventures Max and Kevin had together.

Explanation: