What were people’s attitudes about global institutions after the war?

Answer: 82

Explanation:

The United States government is member of many international organizations, including the United Nations (UN), World Trade Organization (WTO), World Health Organization (WHO), and International Monetary Fund (IMF), among others.

The United Nations (UN) is an international organization founded in 1945 to promote peace, security, and cooperation among countries. It has 193 member states and its headquarters are in New York City. The UN works on a wide range of issues, including human rights, economic development, environmental sustainability, and international conflict resolution. It is composed of several bodies, including the General Assembly, the Security Council, the International Court of Justice, and the Secretariat. The UN also manages several specialized agencies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Its mission is to facilitate international cooperation and maintain global stability, with the ultimate goal of achieving peace and prosperity for all people.

To learn more about United Nations, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8989420

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Which organizations have the U.S. gov as a member?

The main reason why some Northerners opposed the annexation of Texas was because Texas allowed slavery. The correct option is A.

Texas was a territory that permitted the institution of slavery, which was a divisive issue in the United States at the time. Many Northerners, particularly those who were part of the anti-slavery movement, objected to the expansion of slaveholding territories.

They saw the annexation of Texas as a way to extend slavery's influence and power in the country, which contradicted their beliefs and goals..

Thus, the ideal selection is option A.

Learn more about slavery here:

https://brainly.com/question/9030828

#SPJ6

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, many anthropologists and linguists have become involved in projects documenting and preserving languages with small numbers of native speaker.

Languages with small numbers of native speakers are often referred to as endangered or threatened languages. These languages face the risk of extinction due to various factors such as globalization, language shift, cultural assimilation, and political and social changes.

Anthropologists and linguists recognize the importance of linguistic and cultural diversity and the value of preserving endangered languages. They understand that languages carry unique cultural knowledge, worldviews, and ways of expression that contribute to the richness of human diversity.

The involvement of anthropologists and linguists in projects focused on endangered languages is crucial for raising awareness, promoting language rights, and supporting the efforts of communities to preserve their linguistic and cultural heritage.

For such more question on speaker:

https://brainly.com/question/21553893

#SPJ8

Answer:

yes, no, yes, no,

Explanation:

this was taught in middle school for me.

Answer:

They resented Mexican laws. They were unhappy that official documents were written in Spanish. Slave owners became angry when Mexico outlawed slavery in 1829.

Explanation:

plz mark me brainliest:)  

Answer:

Its A if ur on quizlet, if not look up

Explanation:

Governments have extra powers including quarantine, laws requiring immunization, and regulatory authorities in addition to voluntary activities and services that contribute to public health.

To learn more about government's role in public health refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14370861

#SPJ1

It's crucial to approach dealing with a different culture that is polar on each dimension with an open mind and a willingness to comprehend and accept their viewpoints. Here are some tactics to take into account:  

Answer:

These two historians share ideas on the importance of history, both claiming that it is a vital thing to remember the past. However, they are looking at it from altered perspectives.

Explanation:

The first historian claims that history is the reason for the way we are, in other words, that the past has played a major role in the values we hold and the way that our society functions. For this very reason, we can infer that the historian believed that we should also learn from our mistakes given that our present society right now is still far from perfect. The second historian shares a similar idea, however, puts the focus on the fact that our history wasn't perfect, and that's why we need to shift our attention to making sure our future is. After taking this into account, we can infer that both historians highlight the importance of history, whether that be for the present or the future.

Answer:

The Twenty-second Amendment (Amendment XXII) to the United States Constitution limits the number of times a person is eligible for election to the office of President of the United States to two, and sets additional eligibility conditions for presidents who succeed to the unexpired terms of their predecessors

The amendment prohibits anyone who has been elected president twice from being elected again

When term limits are found in presidential and semi-presidential systems they act as a method of curbing the potential for monopoly, where a leader effectively becomes "president for life". This is intended to protect a republic from becoming a de facto dictatorship.

Then Presidents may become more sincere

C. Ritually sacrificed human beings

Answer:

D

Explanation:

hope this works for you :)

Answer:

A

Explanation:

A picture of a politician mowing the lawn is a plain folks appeal.

The instructions in the picture outline a task to compare two primary sources related to the same historical event. The two sources are a letter and a newspaper article about the Boston Tea Party in 1773.

The letter is written by George Hewes, a participant in the Tea Party, and provides a first-hand account of the event. It describes the actions of the Sons of Liberty in dumping tea into Boston Harbor to protest against the British tax policies.

The letter also mentions the response of the British government and how the colonists prepared themselves for the consequences of their actions.

The newspaper article, on the other hand, is a second-hand account of the event and presents a more critical view of the colonists' actions. It accuses the colonists of committing an act of violence and highlights the damage caused to private property and the economic consequences of the Tea Party.

Comparing the two sources allows for a better understanding of the different perspectives and motivations behind the event. It shows how historical events can be viewed and interpreted differently depending on the source and the biases and agendas of the writers.

By examining primary sources, historians can uncover the complexities of historical events and gain a more nuanced understanding of the past.

To know more about  Boston Tea Party click this link -

brainly.com/question/564952

#SPJ11

Answer:

there is no picture

Explanation:

True, black South Africans favored a Xhosa-language Methodist hymn entitled "Nkosi  Sikelel' iAfrika" (Lord Bless Africa).

The hymn became an essential component of anti-apartheid rallies and an anthem for the movement in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Namibia, with several nations including it as a portion of their national anthem. This hymn was originally written in the Xhosa language by a Methodist missionary named Enoch Sontonga in 1897. The hymn was intended to spread a message of peace and hope in the region. Over the years, it became a rallying cry for anti-apartheid activists and a symbol of unity and strength for black South Africans.

Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika has been embraced as a symbol of African unity and is sung as a closing hymn at several events.

Learn more about anthem

https://brainly.com/question/19161987

#SPJ11

Answer:

To obey the Pope's call to free the Holy city from the infidels and ensure access for pilgrims. St Bernaud of Clairvaux wrote in 1140, Of mighty soldier, oh man of war, you now have something to fight for. If you win it will be glorious. If you die fighting for Jerusalem, you will win a place in heaven.

To be forgiven for past sins. The Pope offered forgiveness for anyone who took part. This was important for knights who had killed many people in battle.

To see the world, have an adventure and prove their bravery.

To get land overseas. This was tempting for a younger son who would not inherit his father's lands.

Serfs, peasants who belonged to their lord, joined the Crusades because the Pope promised them their freedom if they went.

To gain wealth.

Kings encouraged troublesome knights to go on Crusade because it got them out of the country.

In the 1000s, tension increased between Muslims and Christians

The Taking of Jerusalem by the Crusaders

Some historians would argue that whilst the primary motive may have been religious, many Crusaders got side-tracked by their greed and lust for power. This may explain why they slaughtered fellow Christians in Constantinople during the first Crusade and took control of Edessa, which was not on the route to Jerusalem and did not contain any holy sites.

Answer:

economic, cultural, social and political history as well as the history of ideas.

Explanation:

Answer:

Old presidents

What slavery was like

Martin Luther King

Explanation:

The thing that was was important about Isaac Newton's principia was discovery of gravity and laws of planetary motion.

Principia Mathematica w help in the act of exposing the logical underpinnings of mathematics,  which helps to demonstrate that the fundamental ideas and processes of reasoning employed in mathematics may be defined logically.

It should be noted that as the discovery of gravity and the laws governing planetary motion was done, it unleashed the cosmos as ell as the establishment of an approach to research that has since become the de facto standard.

Learn more about Newton's principia at:

https://brainly.com/question/21069082

#SPJ1

Option (b),  This speech directly led to the Lend-Lease Act, which now serves as U.S. policy.

The project was backed by President Roosevelt, who was in favor of American participation in WWII and regarded it as a way to indirectly aid the Allies without involving the nation in a fight that did not yet enjoy broad public support.

The United States provided thirty-eight countries with access to about $50 billion worth of military equipment, supplies, and other commodities between 1941 and 1945 under the Lend-Lease program. The Soviet Union, China, and France received the majority of the sums that were left over. 30 billion or so of the total were given to Britain.

Learn more about the Lend-Lease Act: https://brainly.com/question/1126649

#SPJ1

Answer:

Before the Civil War, the transportation systems of the North and South were different in that the North had a vastly more developed system of railroads.  The South did not need railroads, particularly not railroads that connected many parts of the region.  Its economy depended on getting cotton to seaports, not on getting a variety of goods from each place to each other place

Sum it up in your own words, have an amazing day!

Preserved food remains found in Pompeii include carbonized food, Pompeian wine, and preserved fish and seafood.

The three types of food remains found preserved in Pompeii include:

Carbonized food: Due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, organic materials were carbonized by the intense heat, resulting in the preservation of bread, fruits, vegetables, and grains in their charred form.

Pompeian wine: Amphorae and other containers containing wine were discovered in Pompeii, providing insights into the local wine production and consumption during that time.

Fish and seafood: Pompeii's proximity to the sea allowed for the preservation of fish and other marine species.

Learn more about Pompeii on:

https://brainly.com/question/13462451

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

epics written by Homer in the 8th century BC. They are considered two of the greatest works of ancient Greek literature, and are still widely read and studied today. The Iliad tells the story of the Trojan War and its aftermath, while The Odyssey tells the story of the Greek hero Odysseus and his journey home after the war. Both epic poems are known for their complex characters, intricate plots, and vivid descriptions of battle and adventure.

Answer:

The prizes, originally endowed with a gift of $500,000 from the newspaper magnate Joseph Pulitzer, are highly esteemed and have been awarded each May since 1917. The awards are made by Columbia University on the recommendation of the Pulitzer Prize Board, composed of judges appointed by the university.

Answer:

shops shutting down or closed for now, large number of deaths, as well as people unable to work, which caused lots of people in-need of money.

Explanation:

The Environmental Counterculture and Women's Rights Movements were two important social movements that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, respectively.

The objectives of these movements were to raise awareness about environmental degradation and to advocate for gender equality and women's rights.

The Environmental Counterculture movement aimed to promote sustainable living and to raise awareness about the negative impact of human activities on the environment. The movement's outcomes included increased public awareness about environmental issues and the development of new technologies and practices that were more sustainable.

Learn more about Women's Rights Movements

https://brainly.com/question/461813

#SPJ4

Answer:

American diplomats were particularly dismayed by the Soviet installation of a pro-communist government in Poland in 1945 due to several reasons:

Ideological Conflict: The United States and the Soviet Union held fundamentally different ideologies and political systems. The Soviet Union was a communist state, while the United States was a capitalist democracy. The establishment of a pro-communist government in Poland represented the expansion of Soviet influence and communism, which clashed with American values and interests.

Broken Promises: During World War II, the Allies, including the United States and the Soviet Union, had agreed to support the principle of self-determination for nations in post-war Europe. The Soviet Union had pledged to allow free and fair elections in Eastern European countries, including Poland. However, despite these assurances, the Soviet Union installed a pro-communist government in Poland, undermining the principles of self-determination and raising concerns about Soviet intentions.

Threat to Eastern Europe: The Soviet takeover of Poland was seen as a part of a broader pattern of Soviet expansionism and the establishment of communist regimes in Eastern Europe. This development raised fears among American diplomats that the Soviet Union was attempting to create a buffer zone of satellite states under its control, effectively limiting the influence of Western democracies and posing a threat to the security and stability of the region.

Geopolitical Concerns: Poland, as a strategically important country in Eastern Europe, held significance for both the Soviet Union and the United States. Its location provided a gateway to Western Europe, and control over Poland could potentially allow the Soviets to exert influence over neighbouring countries. American diplomats recognized the geopolitical implications of Soviet control in Poland and the potential for further Soviet expansion.

Overall, the establishment of a pro-communist government in Poland by the Soviet Union was seen as a direct challenge to American interests, values, and security, contributing to the deep dismay felt by American diplomats at the time.:

hope this helps :)

Answer:

its b trust me

Explanation:

The land bridge known as Beringia disappeared due to warmer temperatures that submerged it for the final time.

The land bridge known as Beringia, which connected present-day Alaska and Siberia, played a significant role in the migration of early humans from Asia to the Americas. Among the options provided, the accurate statement is that warmer temperatures submerged the land bridge for the final time, leading to its disappearance.

During the last Ice Age, large portions of Earth's water were trapped in glaciers, causing global sea levels to drop. This resulted in the emergence of a land bridge between Asia and North America, known as Beringia. This land bridge allowed human migration across the continents.

However, as the Earth's climate gradually warmed, the glaciers melted, causing the sea levels to rise. This rise in sea levels eventually submerged the land bridge, cutting off the connection between Asia and North America. The process of submergence occurred over thousands of years, and the rising waters permanently eliminated the land bridge.

It's important to note that there is no evidence to support the claims that an earthquake, Native Americans, or those on the Asian side destroyed the land bridge. The disappearance of Beringia was primarily due to the natural process of rising sea levels caused by global climate change.

In summary, the land bridge known as Beringia disappeared due to warmer temperatures that caused the sea levels to rise and submerge it for the final time. This gradual process occurred over thousands of years and was a result of natural climate change, not human activity or destruction.

To learn more about Beringia visit:

brainly.com/question/5034498

#SPJ11